Sir,
We have undertaken a case review using the Bispectral index monitoring (BIS, Covidien—Medtronic, Boulder, CO, USA) in vitrectomy surgery under local anaesthesia, and would suggest that it may have a role in improving surgeon satisfaction and reducing intraoperative movements.
The BIS considers the EEG and EMG data, monitoring parameters of the waveforms to provide a final score that may be used to assist with titrating sedation. The exact level to target in the operating room is still unknown, with Kelley suggesting that for moderate sedation, a BIS of 80 is appropriate with a broader range extending from 70–100 also provided.1
Case series
We present a case series of 54 patients undergoing a vitrectomy for retinal detachment, macular hole repair or epiretinal membrane peel, who were followed prospectively by a single surgeon and anaesthetist. A predominance of peribulbar blocks with 1% ropivicaine and 150 IU hyaluronidase and an average of 50 μg of intravenous fentanyl and propofol titrated for the patient’s comfort were used. Intraoperative target-controlled infusion of propofol was programmed to a serum level utilising the patient’s age and weight. Adjustments to the infusion were made by the anaesthetist based on BIS and clinical parameters collectively.
A mean surgeon satisfaction of 8.8 (95% CI 8.3–9.3), was recorded with a peak at a mean BIS level of 80–85 and 85–90. See Figure 1. This was recorded immediately after the surgery had been completed, and was measured using a 10 cm linear scale to allow for a continuous variable.
Optimal outcomes in vitrectomies are dependant on a low number of intraoperative movements. In our series there were 0.7 obtrusive movements (95% CI 0.4–1.0) and 0.4 non-obtrusive movements (95% CI 0.2–0.6) per operation. Of the 4378 minutes of collected data, a total of 63 (1.4% per min) intraoperative movements were recorded. The BIS level between 80–85 had the lowest number of movements (0.86% per min, n=1044) and increased as the BIS became closer to 95–100 (2.1% per min n=139) and<60 (7.3% per min n=55). See Figure 2.
There were no cases of patient mortality or significant morbidity throughout the case series. Thirteen complaints by eight patients (for example, nasal pruritis) were amended with simple interventions.
Comment
In practice, ophthalmic anaesthesia techniques are varied.2 Local anaesthesia is preferred in ophthalmic surgery, with general anaesthesia utilised in prolonged or difficult cases and when local anaesthesia is contraindicated.3 With monitored anaesthetic care, it provides improved cardiovascular and respiratory stability intraoperatively, a good recovery and high patient satisfaction.4
With vitrectomy surgery including peeling procedures, and the duration of surgery being considerably longer than cataract surgery, a stable level of sedation and a need for minimal movements is increasingly important. The BIS may assist the anaesthetist with titrating the sedation when used collaboratively with other clinical indicators. If the patient is moving, with a low BIS score, there may be a role to reduce the sedation and vice versa. This may also help to reduce over-sedation of patients.
This review found that when using BIS monitoring, a level between 80–85, had the highest level of surgeon satisfaction and the lowest number of movements. It provides a tighter target window for monitored anaesthetic care with local anaesthetic block.
References
Kelley SD . Monitoring consciousness using the Bispectral Index (BIS) during anesthesia: a Pocket Guide for Clinicians. Second edition. Covidien. Available at: http://www.covidien.com/imageServer.aspx/doc252087.pdf?contentID=77508&contenttype=application/pdf. (accessed on 15 December 2016).
Thampy R, Hariprasad M, Saha B . Local anaesthesia for ophthamic surgery: a multicentre survey of current practice amongst anaesthetists in the North West. Anaesthesia 2007; 62 (1): 101.
Kumar CM, Eke T, Dodds C, Deane JS, El-Hindy N, Johnston RL et al. Local anaesthesia for ophthalmic surgery—new guidelines from the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Royal College of Ophthalmologists. Eye 2012; 26: 897–898.
Höhener D, Blumenthal S, Borgeat A . Sedation and regional anaesthesia in the adult patient. Br J Anaesth 2008; 100 (1): 8–16.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Porter, A., Lee, L. & Bradshaw, C. Bispectral index monitoring in vitrectomy surgery under local anaesthetic block with sedation: a single surgeon, single anaesthetist review. Eye 31, 1115–1116 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.45
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2017.45