Sir,

We read with interest the recently published article by Wai Ch’ng et al entitled ‘Anterior vitreous displacement of the intravitreal dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex)’1 and wish to share our similar experience in a pseudophakic patient in whom the eye was filled with silicone oil.

Case report

A pseudophakic, 53-year-old Caucasian female required a three-port pars plana vitrectomy with silicone oil tamponade for a recurrent retinal detachment complicated with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. She was a participant in a prospective randomised controlled clinical trial (EudraCT No: 2011-004498-96) and received the study treatment, the slow-release dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) at the end of the procedure. This was injected through a superior sclerostomy into the oil-filled eye before port closure as per study protocol.2

At the first-day postoperative visit, slit lamp examination revealed the steroid implant trapped behind the posterior chamber intraocular lens/bag complex and anterior to the silicone oil bubble. The implant position was unchanged at a routine 10-day postoperative visit (Figure 1), at which point the patient had described noticing a vertical line in her pupil for 5 days. The implant was confirmed to have spontaneously dislocated inferiorly to the vitreous base at 1 month post injection, after the patient had reported its disappearance from the pupillary axis 10 days earlier. No adverse effect was noted. The patient had a routine removal of oil procedure 4 months postoperatively and was subsequently discharged from the vitreoretinal service with an attached retina at 12 months.

Figure 1
figure 1

Day 10 post retinal detachment repair; (a) sustained-release dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex, Allergan Inc.) trapped posterior to PCIOL/bag complex and anterior to oil bubble. (b) Retro-illuminated slit-lamp image. Patient noted a ‘white line in pupil for 5 days’. Spontaneous dislocation of Ozurdex to vitreous base occurred 1 week later.

Comment

The slow-release dexamethasone implant (Ozurdex) is indicated for the treatment of adult patients with macular oedema following retinal vein occlusion, and for posterior non-infectious uveitis.3, 4 It has been used off-label to treat macular oedema in vitrectomised eyes of diabetics5 and in the oil-filled eye of a patient with ankylosing spondylitis.6 Its future use is expected to expand and its behaviour in different vitreous cavity environments remains under assessment.

Our case, and that reported by Wai Ch’ng et al, both highlight a potentially alarming, yet harmless postoperative appearance in eyes treated with a dexamethasone implant. Clearly, the mechanism suggested in the latter (retention within the anterior hyaloid fossa) could not explain the implant position in our vitrectomised oil-filled eye. It is more likely that a combination of the oil buoyancy force and a possible weak adhesion between the implant surface and posterior lens capsule resulted in its transient anomalous position.

Irrespective of the differing proposed mechanisms, both cases may serve to reassure clinicians that a retrolenticular trapped dexamethasone implant in the early post-injection period appears to be an innocuous finding.