Introduction

Glaucoma is a term covering a heterogeneous group of conditions that have in common an irreversible and usually progressive optic neuropathy resulting in distinctive patterns of visual field loss. Around 2% of the population have POAG beyond the age of 40 years, rising to around 4% at the age of 80 years.1 In the context of the ageing population, the prevalence of glaucoma will rise and become an even greater health problem. It is estimated that up to 35% of the retinal ganglion cells have already been lost before the visual field defects can be detected by perimetry, and subjective awareness of field loss usually occurs later still.2 Therefore, only after the eye has already suffered significant and permanent damage is a patient likely to be commenced on treatment. In developed countries, fewer than 50% of those with glaucoma are aware of their disease.3 There is currently no available screening method that detects glaucoma before permanent damage having occurred.

In the United Kingdom, the annual cost associated with blindness because of glaucoma probably exceeds £100 million.1 The real impact of the disease is almost certainly greater, as visual field loss can have a profound impact on the quality of life of the affected patient, such as loss of driving licence, even when visual acuity is relatively unaffected. In addition, treatments given for glaucoma, whether surgical or medical, can further reduce the patient's quality of life. On an individual basis, the lifestyle changes necessary when suffering from this chronic disease and the functional limitations resulting from loss of vision are immense. This loss of vision may be postponed or prevented by early diagnosis and appropriate treatment. However, with the current methods, early diagnosis still represents permanent visual loss. Once glaucoma is diagnosed, the patient has to be followed up by an ophthalmologist for the rest of his/her life. At present, between a quarter and a third of all patients attending ophthalmology clinics have glaucoma. This proportion, and the absolute number of patients, is set to increase as the population ages. First-degree relatives of individuals affected with glaucoma have up to an eightfold increased risk of developing glaucoma compared with the general population.4 First-degree relatives are, therefore, encouraged to have regular eye examinations, although only a fraction of these patients will ever develop glaucoma.

A major step forward in the understanding of POAG was the discovery that dominant mutations in the myocilin gene (MYOC; accession identifier NM_000261) are responsible for this condition in up to 4% of cases.5, 6 Over 70 mutations have subsequently been identified by numerous other groups;7, 8, 9, 10 however, this is a small fraction of the total number of patients affected with POAG. The extremely high prevalence of POAG in the general population means that this represents several tens of thousands of patients in the United Kingdom. The myocilin gene encodes the trabecular meshwork-induced glucocorticoid response (TIGR) protein and is expressed in the ciliary body, a tissue responsible for regulating aqueous humour secretion and intraocular pressure (IOP).11

As MYOC mutations are dominant and highly penetrant, there will, therefore, be a further cohort of first-degree relatives carrying high-risk MYOC alleles. Screening for MYOC mutations represents an opportunity to improve glaucoma management. It would allow patients known to carry MYOC mutations to be monitored closely in glaucoma clinics and to have treatment instituted at an earlier stage, thus preserving vision. This has already been shown to be effective in a small family study.12 As myocilin glaucoma is a dominant disease, family members of the index case could also be monitored and complications of glaucoma could be avoided, whereas family members who are negative for an MYOC mutation could be released from the follow-up. Currently, in ophthalmic practice in the United Kingdom, relatives of patients with POAG are screened in ophthalmic clinics or by opticians in the community. In either case, this can be costly for either the National Health Service (NHS) or for the patients themselves. Tailored screening is likely to provide financial savings in both cases by focussing resources on the highest risk groups. Furthermore, identifying groups with significantly greater risk of developing glaucoma may provide the stimulus for the development of less widely used screening modalities. Therefore, MYOC mutation screening would not significantly increase glaucoma services workloads, but rather concentrate resources on patients most at risk of developing myocilin glaucoma. Myocilin is an attractive gene to screen as the majority of mutations (93%) are concentrated in one exon, namely exon 3 (http://www.myocilin.com/variants.php), where the commonest mutation is 90% penetrant.12 MYOC screening fulfils the Wilson–Jungner criteria for appraising the validity of a screening programme.13 We evaluated how feasible it was to conduct myocilin glaucoma screening in a regional glaucoma service.

Materials and methods

Ethical approval for the collection of patient information and blood samples was provided by the Southampton and South West Hampshire Local Research Ethics Committee (05/Q1702/8) and Cohort Recruitment commenced in August 2005. The majority of study participants presented as outpatients at Southampton University Hospital Eye Unit, although ethical approval has recently been extended such that on-going recruitment can include patients presenting at smaller satellite glaucoma clinics within the region. Each patient was examined by an experienced glaucoma specialist. Diagnoses were made on the basis of characteristic visual field loss/glaucomatous optic disc damage/increased IOP. Patients presenting with narrow-angle, developmental or secondary glaucoma or any other known abnormalities of the anterior segment were excluded. Patients with unambiguous glaucoma, but normal tension were included in sample collection later. Furthermore, to select for patients with typical POAG or normal-tension glaucoma (NTG), only patients diagnosed over the age of 40 years were included. Both conditions are rare before this age.

Intra ocular pressure (IOP) data were taken at various time points and the maximum values for each eye (maxIOP) recorded for all recruits to allow stratification by disease subset during later analyses. Specialists also completed a patient information sheet for each participant detailing phenotypic and covariate data. This included date of diagnosis, treatment for hypertension, use of eye drops, incidence of myopia (any myopic correction) before 40 years of age, family history, ethnicity, and ocular surgery history. Participants were also asked about symptoms of Raynaud's syndrome. Ocular-specific data collected for each eye include IOP, vertical cup/disc ratio, presence of visual field defect, and corneal thickness. Quantitative data on the number of eye drops used, earlier trabeculectomy surgery, and history of optic disc haemorrhages were also collected.

DNA was extracted according to the standard methods,14 dissolved in TE buffer, and stored at −20 °C. DNA concentrations were measured using a NanoDrop 1000 spectrophotometer and normalised to 10 ng/μl. In all, 15 μl of DNA from 316 samples were plated into 4 × 96-well plates and dispatched on ice to the Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory in Salisbury for MYOC gene screening. Also included on these plates were six duplicate samples and seven positive control samples, that is, individuals previously identified to carry MYOC gene mutations. These positive controls were provided by collaborators and did not form part of our cohort. The diagnostic technician was blind as to which wells contained the diagnostic controls.

Point mutation analysis of the myocilin gene was carried out using transgenomic wave dHPLC analysis of six PCR fragments, which cover the entire coding sequence of the gene and include two overlapping fragments for exon 1, one for exon 2, and three overlapping fragments for exon 3 (primer sequences and dHPLC conditions available on request). Any abnormal dHPLC results (suggestive of polymorphisms) were then followed up by direct sequencing of the relevant fragment using BigDye version 1.1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, USA, www.appliedbiosystems.com).

Statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA).

Results

Summary statistics are presented on a total of 316 unrelated Caucasian patients for whom DNA was available for study in Tables 1a and b. The age range of the cohort was 40–98 years; mean age was 75 years, and median age was 77 years.

Table 1 Summary statistics of nominal (A) and quantitative (B) collected for 316 glaucoma patients

There was no significant gender difference in the sample (n=165 men and 151 women; P=0.43). The mean IOP and cup/disc ratio measurements were 26.27 and 0.74 mmHg, respectively, although this did include 48 patients diagnosed with NTG. A positive family history was reported by 45.5% of the patients. A correlation matrix (Table 2), examining key diagnostic variables for high-tension and NTG groups separately, shows that cup/disc ratio and visual field loss are highly correlated. This correlation coefficient is very similar for both NTG and high-tension glaucoma, but the significance of this finding is most apparent in the larger sample of high-tension POAG patients. Within both the NTG and high-tension groups, patients tend to be diagnosed at an earlier age where there is a positive family history, but the strength of the significance is greater in the larger high-tension group (P=2.04 × 10–5). An earlier age of diagnosis is also observed in patients designated myopic before the age of 40 years (P=1.37 × 10–4). However, we cannot distinguish whether this is due to some ‘double-hit’ effect of having myopia and a predisposition for developing glaucoma or whether the younger age of diagnosis is simply due to an ascertainment bias introduced by regular optical checks in patients with myopia. Patients diagnosed at a later age tend to have more extensive visual field loss (P=0.008). We speculate that as those with a positive family history are diagnosed at a younger age, this is likely to explain our observation that they have less extensive visual field loss (P=0.005).

Table 2 Correlation matrix of key diagnostic variables for POAG (upper right diagonal) and NTG (lower left diagonal)

Mutation analysis correctly identified all seven diagnostic controls. All duplicate samples showed concordant results for the mutation screen. Of the 316 samples in our cohort, five patients carried the p.Q368x and one patient carried the p.T293K non-synonymous disease-causing mutations, both of which have been reported earlier in the MYOC gene (Table 3; http://www.myocilin.com/variants.php). One additional patient was shown to carry a novel point mutation causing a substitution of arginine for cysteine (Cys) at codon 296 (p.R296C) of the myocilin protein, and this unfavourable substitution was assumed to be disease causing because of the likely effect on the secondary structure of the protein. This mutation was not observed in any of the 630 chromosomes examined from the other 315 patients in our cohort. We observed no disease-causing mutations within exons 1 or 2 of the gene, although many neutral polymorphisms were detected across all three exons of the gene, all of which had been reported earlier (http://www.myocilin.com/variants.php). None of the seven patients had been previously aware of their MYOC mutation status and only four of these seven had indicated a family history of glaucoma. Interestingly, two of the seven patients had a clinical diagnosis of NTG. All four patients reporting a positive family history were carriers of the p.Q368X mutation.

Table 3 Seven cases carrying a disease-causing MYOC mutation.

Some reports have suggested glaucoma patients carrying MYOC disease-causing mutations present at an earlier age and/or with IOP greater than that in non-MYOC glaucoma.15 We examined IOP and age at onset in these seven patients compared with the rest of the sample, and found no evidence for a younger age at onset (P=0.21) or significantly higher IOP (P=0.81). However, this may not be surprising given five of our patients carried the p.Q368X mutation that one study identified as not conferring such a predisposition to early onset or unusually high IOP.16

Discussion

This study highlights the feasibility of detecting myocilin glaucoma mutations in a regional NHS glaucoma service. In this clinic, a prevalence rate of 2.2% was detected. If the age of inclusion of patients had been widened, for example, to include juvenile glaucoma, the prevalence is likely to have been higher. Positive control DNA used for this work was ascertained through previous diagnostic assay.

Dominant mutations in the myocilin gene represent the primary genetic cause for POAG identified to date and are responsible for up to 4% of cases in populations studied thus far. Using dHPLC analysis followed by direct sequencing, we have screened the entire coding region of this gene in our novel cohort and identified seven patients carrying disease-causing mutations. None of these patients had been previously aware of their MYOC gene mutation status and those who had indicated a preference to be informed of any clinically significant results (on their study consent forms) have subsequently been advised. As a direct result of this new information, a number of non-symptomatic relatives of these patients have now presented for myocilin screening.

Importantly, following on from the validation of this assay in this study, the Wessex Regional Genetics Laboratory now offers this test as part of the NHS, thus making this service available to clinicians throughout the United Kingdom. The cost to the NHS for each sample is approximately £1 per PCR fragment per patient (excluding cost of staff and overheads). Any relatives identified as carriers of a disease-causing MYOC mutation can be closely monitored for signs of glaucoma. Very early detection and treatment instigation may significantly ameliorate vision loss in these individuals. Furthermore, by identifying first-degree relatives without MYOC mutations, these patients may be released from the traditional intensive screening programmes. This would offer significant savings to both patients and the NHS.

Earlier studies of unrelated glaucoma patients observed approximately 2–4% frequency of myocilin mutations in unrelated glaucoma patients from various ethnic groups17 (ie, 4.3% in patients from Iowa, USA; 2.6 % in African Americans from New York ; 2.8% in Japanese patients; 3.0% in Canadian patients; and 2.8% in Australian patients). Our screen identifies an overall prevalence of 2.2% in Caucasian POAG /NTG patients ascertained through ophthalmic clinics in Southern England. Similar to other studies, the disease-causing mutations detected in this population tended to occur in exon 3. One observed mutation has not been reported earlier (R296C) and may represent a population-specific variant. The introduction of a Cys residue by this variant is likely to represent a pathogenic mutation. Relative to other amino acids in proteins, Cys residues are often functionally important. They play important roles in a variety of functions, including metal binding and formation of disulphide bonds that alter protein structure.18 For these reasons, mutations causing the appearance or loss of this residue are often pathogenic. Furthermore, the 296 location within the myocilin gene shows significant evolutionary conservation (UniProt database http://www.uniprot.org/) through to the Zebrafish species Danio rerio (data not presented). This also suggests an important role for the wild-type arginine residue in this position.

Typically, both POAG and NTG occur after the age of 40 years. For this reason, patients who were diagnosed with either condition before this age were excluded from this study. Therefore, genetic mutations, which tend to cause early onset or childhood glaucoma (neither of which are the primary focus of this study) have been selected against to identify mutations causing ‘typical’ POAG/NTG.

Diagnosis of glaucoma can be extremely complex and identification of the precise age at which glaucomatous disease started can be extremely difficult. We have validated a genetic test for myocilin glaucoma, which is now available in the NHS in an accredited NHS Regional Genetics Laboratory. Now, it provides NHS clinicians with another tool to identify patients (and their family members) suffering from myocilin glaucoma. This should permit earlier diagnosis and consequently reduce the late stage complications of glaucoma.