Abstract
Purpose: To assess the inter-observer agreement of the measurement of optic disc dimensions by two observers using a modified 60 dioptre (D) fundus examination lens.
Method: The vertical disc and cup diameters of 29 eyes were measured by two independent observers using a 60 D lens modified by incorporation of a 0.1 millimetre scale graticule. The vertical cup/disc ratio was calculated. Inter-observer agreement was assessed by calculation of the inter-observer differences and by the weighted kappa statistic.
Results: The two observers showed good agreement for the measurement of disc diameter (mean difference -0.04; range -0.04, 0.2) and for cup diameter (mean difference -0.03; range 0.3, 0.2). Closer agreement for the vertical cup/disc ratio was achieved (mean kappa 0.96; 95% confidence limits 0.90, 1.0). The 95% confidence limit for the mean inter-observer difference in cup/disc ratio was 0.11, suggesting that a change of >0.1 in the assessment of the cup/disc ratio by this technique is significant at the 5% level.
Conclusion: High inter-observer agreement of optic disc measurement can be achieved with this technique. The method has the potential to improve the clinical evaluation of the optic disc and the precision and accuracy of the clinical measurement of other fundal structures.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Armaly MF, Sayegh RE . The cup/disc ratio: the findings of tonography and tonometry in the normal eye. Arch Ophthalmol 1969;82:191–6.
Kahn HA, Leibowitz H, Ganley JP, Kini M, Colton T, Nickerson R, Dawber TR . Standardising diagnostic procedures. Am J Ophthalmol 1975;79:768–75.
Abrams LS, Scott IU, Spaeth G, Quigley HA, Varma R . Agreement among optometrists, ophthalmologists and residents in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1662–7.
Lichter PR . Variability of expert observers in evaluating the optic disc. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1976;74:532–72.
Varma R, Steinmann WC, Scott IU . Expert agreement in evaluating the optic disc for glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1992;99:215–21.
Cooper RL, Adler VA, Constable IJ . Measurement vs judgement of cup:disc ratios: statistical evaluation of intra-observer and inter-observer error. Glaucoma 1982;4:169–76.
Caprioli J, Klingbeil U, Sears M, Pope B . Reproducibility of optic disc measurements with computerised analysis of stereoscopic video images. Arch Ophthalmol 1986;104:1035–9.
Shields MB, Martone JF, Shelton AR, Ollie AR, MacMillan J . Reproducibility of topographic measurements with the optic nerve head analyser. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;104:581–6.
Montgomery DMI . Measurement of optic disc and neuroretinal rim areas in normal and glaucomatous eyes: a new clinical method. Ophthalmology 1991;98:50–9.
Mikelberg FS, Wijsman K, Schulzer M . Reproducibility of topographic parameters obtained with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph. J Glaucoma 1993;2:101–3.
Spencer AF, Sadiq SA, Pawson P, Vernon SA . Vertical optic disc diameter: discrepancy between planimetric and SLO measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995;36:796–803.
Mikelberg FS, Parfitt CM, Swindale NV, Graham SL, Drance SM, Gosine R . Ability of the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph to detect early glaucomatous visual field loss. J Glaucoma 1995;4:242–7.
O'Connor DJ, Zeyen T, Caprioli J . Comparison of methods to detect glaucomatous optic nerve damage. Ophthalmology 1993;100:1498–503.
Bland JM, Altman DG . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;I:307–10.
Zadnik K, Mutti DO, Adams AJ . The repeatability of measurements of the ocular components. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:2325–33.
Fleiss JL . Statistical methods for rates and proportions. New York: Wiley, 1981:212–35.
Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Miller NR, Sommer A . Intra-observer and inter-observer agreement in measurement in optic disc characteristics. Ophthalmology 1988;95:350–6.
Montgomery DMI . Clinical disc biometry in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1993;100:52–6.
Zadnik K, Mutti DO . Statistical analysis for method comparison data. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:582–3.
Jonas JB, Gusek GC, Naumann GOH . Optic disc morphometry in chronic primary open angle glaucoma. I. Morphometric intrapapillary characteristics. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988;226:522–30.
Varma R, Steinmann WC, Spaeth GL, Wilson RP . Variability in digital analysis of optic disc topography. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1988;226:435–42.
Mikelberg FS, Douglas GR, Schulzer M, Cornsweet TN, Wijsman K . Reliability of optic disc topographic measurements recorded with a video-ophthalmolo-graph. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;98:98–102.
Klein BEK, Magli YL, Richie KA, Moss SE, Meuer SM, Klein R . Quantitation of optic disc cupping. Ophthalmology 1985;92:1654–6.
Montgomery DMI . Measurement of optic disc and neuroretinal rim areas in normal and glaucomatous eyes: a new clinical method. Ophthalmology 1991;98:50–9.
Ruben S . Estimation of optic disc size using indirect biomicroscopy. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:363–4.
Spencer AF, Vernon SA . Optic disc measurement: a comparison of indirect ophthalmoscopic methods. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:910–5.
Montgomery DMI . Clinical disc biometry in early glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1993;100:52–6.
Barr DB . Estimation of optic disc size [letter]. Br J Ophthalmol 1995;79:298–9.
Jonas JB, Papastathopoulos K . Ophthalmoscopic measurement of the optic disc. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1102–6.
Elkington JR, Frank HJ . Clinical optics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific, 1991.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haslett, R., Batterbury, M., Cuypers, M. et al. Inter-observer agreement in clinical optic disc measurement using a modified 60 D lens. Eye 11, 692–697 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.179
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1997.179
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Magnification-corrected indirect biomicroscopy of the optic nerve head
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology (2005)