Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Body composition, energy expenditure and physical activity

Comparing single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis against deuterium dilution to assess total body water

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

In this study, we aimed to validate the accuracy of single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (SF-BIA) at 50 kHz to assess total body water (TBW) against the reference technique deuterium dilution (D2O) and to explore if the simple clinical parameters extracellular fluid (ECF) composition and body shape explain individual differences between D2O and SF-BIA ( Diff BIA - D 2 O ).

Subjects/Methods:

We assessed TBW with D2O and SF-BIA in 26 women and 26 men without known disease or anomalous body shapes. In addition, we measured body shape with anthropometry and ECF composition (osmolality, albumin, glucose, urea, creatinine, sodium and potassium).

Results:

On group average, SF-BIA to predict TBW agreed well with D2O (SF-BIA, 39.8±10.1 l; D2O, 40.4±10.2 l; and Diff BIA D 2 O −0.7 l). In four individuals (‘outliers’; 15% of the study population), Diff BIA D 2 O was high (−6.8 to +3.8 l). Diff BIA D 2 O was associated with individual variations in body shape rather than ECF composition. Using gender-specific analysis, we found that individual variability of waist circumference in men and arm length in women significantly contributed to Diff BIA D 2 O . When removing the four ‘outliers’, these associations were lost.

Conclusions:

In the majority of our sample, BIA agreed well with D2O. Adjusting for individual variability in body shape by anthropometrical assessment could possibly improve the accuracy of SF-BIA for individuals who deviate from mean values with respect to body shape. However, further studies with higher subject numbers are needed to confirm our findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boschmann M, Steiniger J, Hille U, Tank J, Adams F, Sharma AM et al. Water-induced thermogenesis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003; 88: 6015–6019.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gomez JM et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis—part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr 2004; 23: 1226–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sun SS, Chumlea WC, Heymsfield SB, Lukaski HC, Schoeller D, Friedl K et al. Development of bioelectrical impedance analysis prediction equations for body composition with the use of a multicomponent model for use in epidemiologic surveys. Am J Clin Nutr 2003; 77: 331–340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Westerterp KR . Body composition, water turnover and energy turnover assessment with labelled water. Proc Nutr Soc 1999; 58: 945–951.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bland JM . Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 1986; 8: 307–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berneis K, Keller U . Bioelectrical impedance analysis during acute changes of extracellular osmolality in man. Clin Nutr 2000; 19: 361–366.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Haas V, Engeli S, Hofmann T, Riedl A, Haufe S, Kast P et al. Variations in truncal body circumferences affect fat mass quantification with bioimpedance analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2012; 66: 196–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lukaski H United States Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Research Service 1997. Version 23.08.2011 (Internet: http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/publications/publications.htm?seq_no_115=85478 (accessed 24 August 2011).

  9. Fuller NJ, Elia M . Potential use of bioelectrical impedance of the ‘whole body’ and of body segments for the assessment of body composition: comparison with densitometry and anthropometry. Eur J Clin Nutr 1989; 43: 779–791.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Toselli S . Estimation of body composition from bioelectrical impedance of body segments. Int J Anthropol 1999; 14: 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu F, Kuhlmann MK, Kaysen GA, Sarkar S, Kaitwatcharachai C, Khilnani R et al. Segment-specific resistivity improves body fluid volume estimates from bioimpedance spectroscopy in hemodialysis patients. J Appl Physiol 2006; 100: 717–724.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was funded by Medi-Cal Healthcare GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany and the German Obesity Network of Competence (Collaborative Project ADIPOSETARGET, 01GI0830, German Ministry of Research and Education).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V Haas.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haas, V., Schütz, T., Engeli, S. et al. Comparing single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis against deuterium dilution to assess total body water. Eur J Clin Nutr 66, 994–997 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.96

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.96

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links