Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Clinical nutrition, enteral and parenteral nutrition

Preoperative immunonutrition in patients at nutritional risk: results of a double-blinded randomized clinical trial

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

To evaluate the impact of preoperative immunonutrition (IN) on postoperative morbidity in patients at risk of malnutrition undergoing major gastrointestinal (GI) surgery.

Subjects/Methods:

The combination of malnutrition and major GI surgery entails high morbidity. The Nutritional Risk Score (NRS) reliably identifies patients who need preoperative nutrition; the optimal nutritional formula for these patients still needs to be defined. In all, 152 patients with a NRS3 and undergoing elective major GI surgery were randomized between IN or isocaloric-isonitrogenous nutrition (ICN) given for 5 days preoperatively. Patients and caregivers were blinded for the allocated intervention. Thirty days complication rate was the primary endpoint. Infections, length of hospital stay and compliance were considered as secondary outcomes.

Results:

Overall, 145 patients were available for analysis; the 73 patients in the IN group matched well with the 72 ICN patients with regards to patient's and surgical characteristics. In all, 39 IN and 33 ICN patients experienced a total of 48 and 50 postoperative complications, respectively (P=0.723). Both groups did not differ significantly concerning infectious (13 vs 9) complications. Independent risk factors for overall complications were malignant disease (odds ratio (OR)=4.304; confidence interval (CI) 1.317–14.002) and operative time (OR=1.004; CI 1.000–1.008).

Conclusion:

In patients at nutritional risk, complications, infections and hospital stay after major GI surgery were comparable regardless of preoperative supplementation with IN or ICN.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J, Cox PB, Hendry PO, Spies C et alConsensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 961–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW . Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K et alEnhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 2005; 24: 466–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bozzetti F, Gianotti L, Braga M, Di Carlo V, Mariani L et alPostoperative complications in gastrointestinal cancer patients: the joint role of the nutritional status and the nutritional support. Clin Nutr 2007; 26: 698–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schiesser M, Muller S, Kirchhoff P, Breitenstein S, Schäfer M, Clavien PA et alAssessment of a novel screening score for nutritional risk in predicting complications in gastro-intestinal surgery. Clin Nutr 2008; 27: 565–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sorensen J, Kondrup J, Prokopowicz J, Schiesser M, Krähenbühl L, Meier R et alEuroOOPS: an international, multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome. Clin Nutr 2008; 27: 340–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M . Educational and Clinical Practice Committee, European Society of Parenteral and Enteral ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 2003; 22: 415–421.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z . Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr 2003; 22: 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. ASPEN Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines Task Force Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002; 26 (1 Suppl), 1SA–138SA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mariette C, Alves A, Benoist S, Bretagnol F, Mabrut JY, Slim K et al[Perioperative care in digestive surgery. Guidelines for the French society of digestive surgery (SFCD)]. Ann Chir 2005; 130: 108–124.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stratton RJ, Elia M . Who benefits from nutritional support: what is the evidence? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 19: 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P et alESPEN Guidelines on Enteral Nutrition: Surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr 2006; 25: 224–244.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gianotti L, Braga M, Nespoli L, Radaelli G, Beneduce A, Di Carlo V et alA randomized controlled trial of preoperative oral supplementation with a specialized diet in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Gastroenterology 2002; 122: 1763–1770.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cerantola Y, Hubner M, Grass F, Demartines N, Schäfer M . Immunonutrition in gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 2010; 98: 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N . Zurich Fast Track Study Group A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 2009; 136: 842–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA . Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Russell JA . Management of sepsis. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1699–1713.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. de Groot V, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM . How to measure comorbidity. a critical review of available methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56: 221–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Waitzberg DL, Saito H, Plank LD, Jamieson GG, Jagannath P, Hwang TL et alPostsurgical infections are reduced with specialized nutrition support. World J Surg 2006; 30: 1592–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D . CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol 63: 834–840.

  21. Braga M, Gianotti L, Nespoli L, Radaelli G, Di Carlo V . Nutritional approach in malnourished surgical patients: a prospective randomized study. Arch Surg 2002; 137: 174–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Carlo V, Gianotti L, Balzano G, Zerbi A, Braga M . Complications of pancreatic surgery and the role of perioperative nutrition. Dig Surg 1999; 16: 320–326.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gunerhan Y, Koksal N, Sahin UY, Uzun MA, Ekşioglu-Demiralp E . Effect of preoperative immunonutrition and other nutrition models on cellular immune parameters. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 467–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Klek S, Kulig J, Sierzega M, Szczepanek K, Szybiński P, Scislo L et alStandard and immunomodulating enteral nutrition in patients after extended gastrointestinal surgery-a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Nutr 2008; 27: 504–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klek S, Kulig J, Sierzega M, Szybinski P, Szczepanek K, Kubisz A et alThe impact of immunostimulating nutrition on infectious complications after upper gastrointestinal surgery: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial. Ann Surg 2008; 248: 212–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Okamoto Y, Okano K, Izuishi K, Usuki H, Wakabayashi H, Suzuki Y et alAttenuation of the systemic inflammatory response and infectious complications after gastrectomy with preoperative oral arginine and omega-3 fatty acids supplemented immunonutrition. World J Surg 2009; 33: 1815–1821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Satinsky I, Mittak M, Foltys A, Kretek J, Dostalík J . [Comparison various types of artificial nutrition on postoperative complications after major surgery]. Rozhl Chir 2005; 84: 134–141.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Senkal M, Mumme A, Eickhoff U, Geier B, Späth G, Wulfert D et alEarly postoperative enteral immunonutrition: clinical outcome and cost-comparison analysis in surgical patients. Crit Care Med 1997; 25: 1489–1496.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu J, Zhong Y, Jing D, Wu Z . Preoperative enteral immunonutrition improves postoperative outcome in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. World J Surg 2006; 30: 1284–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schindler K, Pernicka E, Laviano A, Howard P, Schütz T, Bauer P et alHow nutritional risk is assessed and managed in European hospitals: a survey of 21 007 patients findings from the 2007-2008 cross-sectional nutritionDay survey. Clin Nutr 2010; 29: 552–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Levy RJ, Deutschman CS . Cytochrome c oxidase dysfunction in sepsis. Crit Care Med 2007; 35 (9 Suppl), S468–S475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stratton RJ, Elia M . Encouraging appropriate, evidence-based use of oral nutritional supplements. Proc Nutr Soc 2010; 69: 477–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hiesmayr M, Schindler K, Pernicka E, Schuh C, Schoeniger-Hekele A, Bauer P et alDecreased food intake is a risk factor for mortality in hospitalised patients: the NutritionDay survey 2006. Clin Nutr 2009; 28: 484–491.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Grass F, Cerantola Y, Schafer M, Müller S, Demartines N, Hübner M et alPerioperative nutrition is still a surgical orphan: results of a Swiss-Austrian survey. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011; 65: 642–647.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Calder PC . Immunonutrition in surgical and critically ill patients. Br J Nutr 2007; 98 (Suppl 1), S133–S139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jones NE, Heyland DK . Pharmaconutrition: a new emerging paradigm. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2008; 24: 215–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Zheng Y, Li F, Qi B, Luo B, Sun H, Liu S et alApplication of perioperative immunonutrition for gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 2007; 16 (Suppl 1), 253–257.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Braga M, Gianotti L, Vignali A, Carlo VD . Preoperative oral arginine and n-3 fatty acid supplementation improves the immunometabolic host response and outcome after colorectal resection for cancer. Surgery 2002; 132: 805–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Sven Müller and Michel Roulet participated in the study design. Giustina Mariotti was the departmental study nurse responsible for data collection and management. Finally, we acknowledge all surgical residents, staff surgeons and nutritionists who were implicated in patients’ recruitment and follow-up. This study was supported by a research grant from Novartis Consumer Health Schweiz AG (Protocol SC-IMP.O-07-06–CH).

Disclaimer

During the study period, the nutrition branch of Novartis was incorporated into Nestlé Nutrition. The investigators had full control of the data and performed statistical analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N Demartines.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on European Journal of Clinical Nutrition website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hübner, M., Cerantola, Y., Grass, F. et al. Preoperative immunonutrition in patients at nutritional risk: results of a double-blinded randomized clinical trial. Eur J Clin Nutr 66, 850–855 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.53

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.53

Keywords

Search

Quick links