Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Body composition, energy expenditure and physical activity

Interpreting common hydration biomarkers on the basis of solute and water excretion

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

This investigation evaluated 12 hydration biomarkers, to determine which represent 24-h whole-body water balance (that is, measured as water retention or clearance (WR-C) by the kidneys).

Subjects/Methods:

Healthy males (n=59; body mass, 75.1±7.9 kg; height, 178±6 cm; age, 22±3 years; body mass index, 23.9±2.4 kg/m2) met with a registered dietitian each morning (days 1–11) to optimize completeness and accuracy of food and fluid records, then went about ordinary daily activities. These men visited the laboratory for blood samples and collected all urine produced on days 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12. The reference standard (WR-C) was calculated using 24-h urine volume, 24-h urine osmolality, and serum osmolality (single morning venous sample).

Results:

Statistical regression analyses indicated that, among the 12 hydration biomarkers, only 24-h urine osmolality (r2=0.60, P<0.0001) and 24-h urine specific gravity (r2=0.52, P<0.0001) strongly predicted WR-C. The 24-h fluid intake, 24-h body mass change, 24-h urine color and 24-h urine volume were weak (P>0.05) predictors of WR-C, similar to serum osmolality and other single measurements (range of r2 values, 0.19–0.0001).

Conclusions:

These observations of healthy, active young men demonstrate that WR-C is strongly related to the 24-h concentration of urine, which in turn reflects the excretion of total solids in the diet. Although morning urine assessments provided information about a single time point, 24-h urine osmolality and 24-h urine specific gravity were the best predictors of 24-h body water balance.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ganio MS, Armstrong LE, Casa DJ, McDermott BP, Lee EC, Yamamoto LM et al. Mild dehydration impairs cognitive performance and mood of men. Brit J Nutr 2011; 106: 1535–1543.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Armstrong LE, Ganio MS, Casa DJ, Lee EC, McDermott BP, Klau JF et al. Mild dehydration affects mood in healthy young women. J Nutr 2012; 142: 382–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Armstrong LE . Assessing hydration status: the elusive gold standard. J Am Coll Nutr 2007; 26: 575S–584S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Opplinger RA, Bartok C . Hydration testing of athletes. Sports Med 2002; 32: 959–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shirreffs S, Maughan R . Urine osmolality and conductivity as indices of hydration status in athletes in the heat. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 1598–1602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shore AC, Markandu ND, Sagnella GA, Singer DR, Forsling ML, Buckley MG et al. Endocrine and renal response to water loading and water restriction in normal man. Clin Sci 1988; 75: 171–177.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Casa DJ, Armstrong LE, Hillman SK, Montain SJ, Reiff RV, Rich BS et al. National athletic trainers’ association position statement: fluid replacement for athletes. J Ath Train 2000; 35: 212–224.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kavouras S . Assessing hydration status. Cur Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2000; 5: 519–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manz F, Wentz A, Sichert-Hellert W . The most essential nutrient: defining the adequate intake of water. J Pediatr 2002; 141: 587–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheuvront SN, Sawka MN . Hydration assessment of athletes. In: Sports Sci Exchange. Gatorade Sports Science Institute: Barrington, IL, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Armstrong LE, Pumerantz AC, Roti MW, Judelson DA, Watson G, Dias JC et al. Fluid, electrolyte, and renal indices of hydration during 11 days of controlled caffeine consumption. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2005; 15: 252–265.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Armstrong LE, Pumerantz AC, Fiala KA, Roti MW, Kavouras SA, Casa DJ et al. Human hydration indices: acute and longitudinal reference values. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2010; 20: 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Armstrong LE, Johnson EC, Munoz CX, Swokla B, Le Bellego L, Jimenez L et al. Hydration biomarkers and dietary fluid consumption of women. J Acad Nutr Diet 2012; 112: 1056–1061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Armstrong LE, Maresh CM, Castellani J, Bergeron M, Kenefick RW, LaGasse KE et al. Urinary indices of hydration status. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 1994; 4: 265–279.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Elorza MA, Garcia A, Fuster A, Muller A . Evaluation of the Auto-Stat 601" Automatic Osmometer and Its Comparison with the Digimatic-Advanced 3DII Manual Osmometer. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1993; 31: 245–249.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ganong WF . Regulation of extracellular fluid composition and volume. In: Review of Medical Physiology 19th edn. Appleton & Lange Co: Stamford, CT, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Guyton AC, Hall JE . Regulation of extracellular fluid osmolarity and sodium concentration. In: Textbook of Medical Physiology 9th edn. W.B. Saunders Co: Philadelphia, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kratz A, Ferraro M, Sluss PM, Lewandrowski KB . Case records of the Massachusetts General Hospital. Weekly clinicopathological exercises. Laboratory reference values. New Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1548–1563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Greenleaf JE . Problem. Thirst, drinking behavior, and involuntary dehydration. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24: 645–656.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tack I . Effects of water consumption on kidney function and excretion. Nutr Today 2010; 45 (Supplement 6), S1–S4.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strippoli GFM, Craig JC, Rochtchina E, Flood VM, Wang JJ, Mitchell P . Fluid and nutrient intake and risk of chronic kidney disease. Nephrology 2011; 16: 326–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sawka MN, Burke LM, Eichner ER, Maughan RJ, Montain SJ, Stachenfeld NS . American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and fluid replacement. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 377–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Manz F, Wentz A . 24-h hydration status: parameters, epidemiology and recommendations. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003; 57 (Suppl 2), S10–S18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences. Dietary reference intakes: water, potassium, sodium, chloride, and sulfate. National Academy Press: Washington, D.C., 2004.

  25. de Castro JM . The relationship of spontaneous macronutrient and sodium intake with fluid ingestion and thirst in humans. Physiol Behav 1991; 49: 513–519.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bossingham MJ, Carnell NS, Campbell W . Water balance, hydration status, and fat-free mass hydration in younger and older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; 81: 1342–1350.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. European Food Safety Authority. Scientific opinion on dietary reference values for water. EFSA J 2010; 8: 1459–1469.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Perrier E, Klein A, Poupin M, Pascale R, LeBellego L, Armstrong L et al. Hydration biomarkers in free-living adults with different levels of habitual fluid consumption. Brit J Nutr 2012; 31: 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Perucca J, Bouby N, Valeix P, Bankir L . Sex differences in urine concentration across differing ages, sodium intake, and level of kidney disease. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2007; 292: R700–R705.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded, in part, by the International Life Sciences Institute North America (ILSI NA), Washington, DC.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L E Armstrong.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Professor Armstrong has received compensation as a consultant to ILSI NA and to Danone Research, Palaiseau France; he serves as a Scientific Advisory Board and Expert Working Group member for the Hydration for Health Initiative of Danone Research. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Armstrong, L., Johnson, E., McKenzie, A. et al. Interpreting common hydration biomarkers on the basis of solute and water excretion. Eur J Clin Nutr 67, 249–253 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.214

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.214

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links