Abstract
Bax is a member of the Bcl-2 family that, together with Bak, is required for permeabilisation of the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM). Bax differs from Bak in that it is predominantly cytosolic in healthy cells and only associates with the OMM after an apoptotic signal. How Bax is targeted to the OMM is still a matter of debate, with both a C-terminal tail anchor and an N-terminal pre-sequence being implicated. We now show definitively that Bax does not contain an N-terminal import sequence, but does have a C-terminal anchor. The isolated N terminus of Bax cannot target a heterologous protein to the OMM, whereas the C terminus can. Furthermore, if the C terminus is blocked, Bax fails to target to mitochondria upon receipt of an apoptotic stimulus. Zebra fish Bax, which shows a high degree of amino-acid homology with mammalian Bax within the C terminus, but not in the N terminus, can rescue the defective cell-death phenotype of Bax/Bak-deficient cells. Interestingly, we find that Bax mutants, which themselves cannot target mitochondria or induce apoptosis, are recruited to clusters of activated wild-type Bax on the OMM of apoptotic cells. This appears to be an amplification of Bax activation during cell death that is independent of the normal tail anchor-mediated targeting.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
The Bcl-2 family of proteins are important regulators of the intrinsic pathway of apoptosis.1 The major site of action of these proteins is the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM), where they regulate release of factors, including cytochrome c and second mitochondrial activator of caspases (Smac)/Diablo, from the intermembrane space to the cytosol, initiating caspase activation. Bax and Bak, pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins, show a high degree of sequence similarity and are absolutely required for cells to permeabilise the OMM.2 Given this similarity, it is surprising that Bax and Bak show a significant difference in their regulation. Bak is permanently on the OMM, whereas Bax is predominantly an inactive monomer in the cytosol of healthy cells.3, 4 Upon receipt of an apoptotic signal, Bax translocates to the mitochondria where it is thought to oligomerise into an active transmembrane pore.5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Most mitochondrial proteins are post-translationally targeted to their destination.11 This targeting is a complex process, each protein having an addressing signal to specifically reach the intended mitochondrial compartment. Most proteins imported into mitochondria contain an N-terminal pre-sequence that is recognised by components of the general import pore (GIP), consisting of the translocase outer membane (TOM) and translocase inner membrane (TIM) complexes.11 These span the OMM and inner mitochondrial membrane respectively. N-terminal pre-sequences contain an amphipathic α-helix, but the exact sequence, surrounding amino acids, and whether it is cleaved, determine the mitochondrial compartment to which the protein is delivered.
Another class of targeting signal is the C-terminal tail anchor.12 A common feature of tail-anchored proteins is a moderately hydrophobic transmembrane domain (TMD), flanked on both sides by basic amino acids.13, 14 The Bcl-2 proteins Bak, Bcl2, Bcl-XL, Bcl-w and Mcl-1 have C-terminal sequences meeting these criteria.15 Bax has a hydrophobic tail that is flanked only at its C terminus by basic amino acids.16 Nonetheless, Bax targets to the OMM, possibly suggesting that other regions determine its mitochondrial localisation. Recently, it was suggested that the Bax C terminus is not a tail anchor, but that its N terminus contains a targeting sequence for the TOM complex.17, 18, 19, 20, 21 In contrast, other reports suggest that a C-terminal anchor is required for Bax translocation during apoptosis.22, 23, 24
Owing to the conflicting evidence for the roles of its N and C termini in Bax function, we have examined the relative contributions of each as a mitochondrial targeting sequence. We show that Bax targeting to mitochondria occurs in two distinct phases. The first occurs exclusively through a C-terminal tail anchor, and is an obligate step for Bax-dependent apoptosis. During OMM permeabilisation, a second wave of Bax recruitment to mitochondria occurs, which is tail anchor-independent. This second wave requires activated Bax or Bak to be present on the OMM, and may represent amplification of apoptotic-pore formation. Distinguishing between these two phases is important to understand how Bax translocation is regulated.
Results
Blocking the C terminus of Bax abrogates its pro-apoptotic function by preventing its recruitment to mitochondria
A number of publications have reported that, unlike other multi-domain Bcl-2 proteins, Bax targeting to the OMM is determined not by a C-terminal anchor sequence but rather by an N-terminal import sequence.17, 18, 19, 20, 21 To directly test this, we generated constructs to express Bax tagged at either the N or the C terminus with yellow fluorescent protein/green fluorescent protein (YFP/GFP). Our reasoning was that if either was required for membrane targeting, the addition of GFP would abrogate that function.
We asked if YFP-Bax or Bax-GFP restored sensitivity of Bax/Bak double-knockout fibroblasts (DKO cells) to staurosporine. YFP-Bax, Bax-GFP or YFP alone were transiently expressed in DKO cells, which were then treated with staurosporine for various times (Figure 1a). There was no significant apoptosis in any of the cells prior to staurosporine treatment. Following staurosporine treatment, YFP-Bax-expressing cells showed significant apoptosis after 30 min. Neither YFP alone nor Bax-GFP significantly increased the sensitivity of DKO cells to staurosporine. When we examined the subcellular distribution of YFP, YFP-Bax and Bax-GFP, we observed that all were diffuse throughout the cytoplasm of untreated cells (Figure 1b). Following treatment with staurosporine, only YFP-Bax showed a punctate distribution associated with a mitochondrial marker (mitochondrial heat shock protein 70, mtHsp70).
We next examined the distribution of YFP-Bax and Bax-GFP during anoikis in epithelial cells. Anoikis allows a temporal analysis of Bax recruitment and its subsequent activation.9, 24 YFP-Bax, Bax-GFP or YFP alone was transiently expressed in FSK-7 mammary epithelial cells, which were detached from extracellular matrix (ECM) for 30 min or 4 h (Figure 2a). In adherent cells, all three proteins were distributed throughout the cytoplasm. As we have previously shown, YFP-Bax redistributed to mitochondria within 30 min following loss of ECM contact, whereas YFP and Bax-GFP remained cytosolic. Interestingly, we observed that after 4 h of detachment, Bax-GFP demonstrated a punctate distribution similar to YFP-Bax, but only in those epithelial cells that had apoptotic nuclei. YFP remained cytosolic in apoptotic cells. To ascertain if Bax-GFP had any pro-apoptotic function in FSK-7 cells, we quantified apoptosis at various times following loss of ECM attachment (Figure 2b). As previously demonstrated, overexpression of YFP-Bax sensitised epithelial cells to anoikis. However, Bax-GFP expression did not sensitise FSK-7 cells to anoikis. Similar levels of expression for Bax-GFP and YFP-Bax were seen by immunoblotting (Figure 2b). Substituting proline 168 to alanine (P168A) in the C terminus of Bax prevents it targeting to the OMM and abrogates its apoptotic activity.23, 24 We asked if Bax-P168A could also redistribute to mitochondria in dead epithelial cells. FSK-7 cells expressing YFP, YFP-Bax, Bax-GFP or YFP-BaxP168A were detached from ECM for 4 h. A punctate distribution was observed for all the Bax constructs in cells with apoptotic nuclei (Figure 2c). As FSK-7 cells express endogenous Bax, it was possible that the recruitment of Bax-GFP and YFP-BaxP168A seen was dependent upon functional Bax being present.
Together, these data suggest that for Bax to promote apoptosis, an exposed C terminus is required. However, although Bax-GFP does not appear to possess any apoptotic activity, it can redistribute to mitochondria following epithelial cell death.
The N terminus of Bax does not contain a mitochondrial targeting sequence
We designed a number of YFP/GFP constructs to directly test if the N or C termini of Bax contained mitochondrial-addressing sequences (Figure 3a). As a control, a known N-terminal mitochondrial import sequence from apoptosis-inducing factor was fused to GFP (AIFMLS-GFP).25 For a C-terminal anchor, we used a previously described construct, YFP-XT, consisting of YFP fused to the C-terminal tail anchor of Bcl-XL.9 When transiently expressed in FSK-7 cells, both AIFMLS-GFP and YFP-XT co-localised with mtHsp70, whereas GFP alone was cytosolic (Figure 3b). The construct consisting of the putative Bax tail anchor, YFP-BaxBH2TMD, co-localised perfectly with mtHsp70. In contrast, BaxNT/α1-GFP, containing the suggested N-terminal signal sequence, was distributed throughout the cytosol. YFP-BaxΔTMD, with the tail anchor deleted, formed large aggregates that did not associate with mitochondria. YFP-BaxBH1/2TMD, which contains not only the tail anchor but also the central hydrophobic α5-helix, formed aggregates that resembled the clusters of Bax found associated with mitochondria in apoptotic cells.
We also examined the distribution of these deletion mutants by biochemical fractionation (Figure 3c). Cells expressing the indicated constructs were separated into soluble and heavy membrane fractions, and analysed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted for GFP, apopotic protease-activating factor 1 (APAF-1) (cytosolic marker) and mtHsp70. All the constructs that co-localised with mtHsp70 by fluorescence were found in the membrane fraction. Both YFP alone and BaxNT/α1-GFP were exclusively cytosolic. YFP-Bax was distributed between both fractions. The two constructs that formed aggregates (YFP-BaxΔTMD and YFP-BaxBH1/2TMD) were detected in the heavy membrane fraction, indicating that biochemical fractionation alone is insufficient to determine if a protein targets to mitochondria. To determine if the Bax constructs inserted into the membrane, heavy membrane fractions were extracted in carbonate buffer (Figure 3d). The cytosolic (supernatant) along with the carbonate-sensitive and carbonate-resistant membrane fractions was immunoblotted. All the YFP-Bax constructs that were associated with the membrane fraction in FSK-7 cells were resistant to carbonate extraction.
Together, these data indicate that the C terminus of Bax is necessary and sufficient for mitochondrial targeting. In contrast, our data indicate that the N terminus of Bax does not contain a mitochondrial targeting sequence.
Zebrafish Bax targets to mitochondria in mammalian cells despite a divergent N-terminal sequence
Regions of sequence conservation between protein homologues from distant species can highlight functional domains. The zebrafish genome contains homologues of most Bcl-2 family proteins.26 We noted that zebrafish Bax (zfBax) showed localised regions of sequence identity with mammalian Bax (Figure 4a). In particular, zfBax showed strong sequence identity at the C terminus, but not at the N terminus. Given the similarity in the C termini, we asked if zfBax could function in mammalian cells.
YFP-zfBax, YFP-Bax or YFP were expressed transiently in DKO MEFs. These were treated with either DMSO or staurosporine. YFP-zfBax was cytosolic in DMSO-treated cells but became punctate following treatment with staurosporine, and was indistinguishable from murine YFP-Bax (Figure 4b). Furthermore, zfBax rescued the apoptosis defect in the DKO cells, shown by the apoptotic nuclei in the cells following staurosporine treatment (Figure 4b), and the presence of activated caspase-3 (Figure 4c).
Given the sequence similarity with mammalian Bax, we asked if the C terminus of zfBax was a mitochondrial anchor sequence. The TMD and the BH2/TMD sequence of zfBax were expressed as YFP fusions in DKO MEFs, as well as the equivalent mouse sequences. Cells were immunostained for mtHsp70 (Figure 4d). The subcellular distribution of the zfBax C terminus was indistinguishable from the mouse constructs, showing constitutive co-localisation with mitochondria. These data support the hypothesis that Bax from distant vertebrate species contains a conserved C-terminal tail anchor. We also expressed YFP-BaxBH2TMD containing the P168A mutation shown to block the association of full-length Bax with mitochondria. In agreement with previous data that indicated that this proline lies outside the tail anchor, YFP-BaxBH2TMDP168A constitutively localised to the OMM.
The Bax C-terminal anchor forms complexes following translocation to mitochondria
To determine if Bax oligomerisation had a role in mitochondrial targeting, we used two-dimensional blue native polyacrylamide electrophoresis (2D BN-PAGE). The 2D BN-PAGE analysis of endogenous Bax indicated that in adherent cells, the cytosolic protein was exclusively monomeric (Figure 5a). Following detachment, mitochondrial Bax was found in a high molecular-weight complex of approximately 200 kDa. YFP-Bax was found in high molecular-weight complexes identical in size to endogenous Bax (Figure 5b). YFP alone analysed by BN-PAGE was monomeric.
C-terminal anchor proteins may be targeted to mitochondria and the ER through interactions with chaperone proteins or receptors,12 and may also oligomerise within the membrane.27 To ask if the tail anchor of Bax interacted with chaperones, we examined the native molecular weights of the Bax C-terminal YFP fusions. YFP-XT, YFP-BaxTMD, YFP-BaxBH2TMD and YFP-zfBaxBH2TMD were expressed in 293T cells; mitochondria isolated and analysed by BN-PAGE. Intriguingly, the YFP-Bax tail anchor constructs also appeared to associate with high molecular-weight complexes on mitochondria, as did YFP-XT. YFP-BaxBH2TMDP168A migrated in an identical manner as the other BaxBH2TMD constructs. Thus, proline 168 does not itself constitute part of the tail anchor and can only regulate its function in the context of full-length Bax. These data indicate that the minimal tail anchor sequences of Bax and Bcl-XL may interact with other proteins on mitochondria. Indeed, Bcl-XL has been shown to form dimers, both with itself and with Bax, via its C-terminal domain.28
Tail anchor-independent amplification of Bax targeting to mitochondria
Bax forms large aggregates on mitochondria during apoptosis.29 Mutants of Bax that cannot target to mitochondria or initiate apoptosis in DKO cells were still recruited to these clusters on the OMM in FSK-7 cells, which express endogenous Bax and Bak. We hypothesised that targeting of non-functional Bax mutants to mitochondria was due to endogenous Bax on the OMM. To test this, we expressed in DKO cells YFP-Bax, Bax-GFP, YFP-BaxP13A, YFP-BaxP168A or the double-mutant YFP-BaxP13/168A. We have shown the proline 13-to-alanine substitution to accelerate Bax-dependent mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilisation (MOMP) following mitochondrial translocation. However, Cartron et al.17, 19 have suggested that the same mutation exposes the proposed N-terminal targeting sequence, resulting in constitutive mitochondrial association. Cells were treated with either DMSO or staurosporine for 2 h (Figure 6a). As previously reported, both YFP-Bax and YFP-BaxP13A induced apoptosis and formed punctate clusters in DKO cells.24 YFP-BaxP168A and Bax-GFP remained cytosolic following staurosporine treatment. Some DKO cells do undergo apoptosis (approximately 5%), presumably through a mitochondrial-independent mechanism. Even in those DKO cells with apoptotic nuclei, YFP-BaxP168A remained cytosolic (Figure 6b). In agreement with our previous findings, YFP-BaxP13/168A also remained cytosolic (Figure 6a).
Next, we co-expressed each of Bax-GFP, YFP-Bax, YFP-BaxP13A, YFP-BaxP168A or YFP-BaxP13/168A along with monomeric red fluorescent protein-Bax (mRFP-Bax) wild type (WT). mRFP-BaxWT restored DKO sensitivity to apoptosis in an identical manner to YFP-Bax (data not shown). Cells were treated with DMSO or staurosporine for 4 h and the distribution of YFP and mRFP compared (Figure 6c). In DMSO-treated cells, the YFP-Bax mutants and mRFPBaxWT were all cytosolic. Staurosporine treatment in DKO cells resulted in recruitment of Bax-GFP, YFP-BaxP168A and YFP-BaxP13/168A to mitochondria in cells expressing mRFP-BaxWT. As in FSK-7 cells undergoing anoikis, recruitment of either of the P168A Bax mutants was observed only in cells that had apoptotic nuclei. We repeated the experiment with mRFP-BaxP168A co-expressed with either GFP-Bak or YFP-Bax containing a non-functional BH3 domain (YFP-BaxBH3mut, L63E/G67E). YFP-BaxBH3mut constitutively targets to mitochondria, but cannot induce cytochrome c release (our unpublished data). Following staurosporine treatment, GFP-Bak recruited mRFPBaxP168A, whereas YFP-BaxBH3mut did not (Figure 6d).
Finally, we asked if the recruitment of non-functional Bax was downstream of caspase activation. DKO cells co-expressing Bax-GFP and mRFP-BaxWT were treated with DMSO or staurosporine, in the presence or absence of zVAD-fmk. Bax-GFP was recruited to mitochondria in mRFP-Bax-expressing cells even if caspase activity had been inhibited (Figure 6e).
Together, these data indicate that Bax mutants that are defective for mitochondrial targeting are still recruited to mitochondrial clusters during apoptosis.
Discussion
Bax translocation during apoptosis is essentially a problem of mitochondrial targeting. Most mitochondrial proteins are translated in the cytosol and imported into the correct mitochondrial compartment via a number of mechanisms.11, 12 The mechanism utilised by Bax remains controversial, with conflicting data indicating an N-terminal pre-sequence or a C-terminal tail anchor. In this paper, we show that Bax is initially targeted to the OMM by a C-terminal tail anchor, and exclude an N-terminal pre-sequence. Tail anchor-mediated targeting of Bax is essential for its function. Subsequently, Bax aggregates form through recruitment and activation of further Bax molecules from the cytosol, which does not require a functional tail anchor. Instead, this second wave requires functional, multi-domain pro-apoptotic proteins on the OMM. Bax and Bak were both capable of recruiting cytosolic Bax during this second wave of targeting.
Most multi-domain Bcl-2 proteins have functional tail anchor sequences;15 however, Tremblais et al. have claimed that Bax does not.20 By replacing the tail anchor sequence of Bcl-XL with the C-terminal 20 amino acids of Bax, they showed that the resulting chimera did not target mitochondria. A crucial point for tail anchor function is the amount of sequence N-terminal to the TMD.14 Although Bax does not have basic residues in that position, this flanking sequence is still important. Schinzel et al.23 indicated that a minimum 23 amino acids of the Bax C terminus is required to target a heterologous protein to mitochondria. When they expressed either a 22- or 21-amino acid GFP-BaxTMD chimeras, the protein remained cytosolic. We show that not only can the C terminus of Bax target YFP to mitochondria, but also can it form protein complexes on the OMM similar in size to those containing full-length Bax.
Another argument put forward for the absence of a tail anchor in Bax was that deletion of the C-terminal 22 amino acids did not block recruitment to mitochondria during apoptosis.19 This can be explained by the amplification of Bax activation we report. Functional Bax or Bak on mitochondria can drive further Bax recruitment from the cytosol using a mechanism separate from the initial tail anchor-dependent targeting. Amplification occurs either during or after MOMP, as we observed punctate Bax-GFP and YFP-BaxP168A only in cells with apoptotic nuclei. Amplification of Bax and Bak activation has previously been shown in vitro.30, 31 Activated Bax on liposomes induced further activation and recruitment of soluble Bax. Taking these studies together, the data suggest that once activation of mitochondrial Bax or Bak has exceeded a certain threshold, it induces a chain reaction of further Bax activation that may irreversibly drive MOMP.
It has been proposed that Bax possesses an N-terminal signal sequence.18 These sequences target proteins to mitochondria via the TOM/TIM GIP. The proposed import sequence does not reside at the extreme N terminus of Bax, but becomes exposed if the first 20 amino acids are removed. In most cases, proteolysis of Bax does not occur during translocation to mitochondria. Also, if the targeting sequence were contained within the N terminus, Bax-GFP might be expected to restore sensitivity to staurosporine of DKO cells. Bax-GFP was unable to rescue apoptosis in DKO cells, while YFP-Bax did, suggesting that a native C terminus is essential, whereas an exposed N terminus is not. Neither the N terminus of mammalian Bax nor that of zfBax is predicted to contain a mitochondrial import sequence when analysed by MitoProt (unpublished observations). Furthermore, the N terminus of Bax had no ability at all to target GFP to mitochondria. Thus, our data do not support the presence of an N-terminal import sequence.
Tail-anchored proteins differ from N-terminal-directed membrane proteins in that targeting must occur following detachment from the ribosome. This post-translational insertion has been shown to require chaperone proteins to mask the hydrophobic TMD in the cytosol.32, 33 Unlike the most known tail-anchored proteins, Bax is not constitutively targeted to the OMM, instead translocating in response to apoptotic stimuli. The solution structure of monomeric Bax indicates that α-helix 9, the TMD of the tail anchor, lies hidden within a hydrophobic groove on the protein surface. Thus, Bax may function as its own chaperone. Youle and co-workers22 found that different mutations within the C-terminal α-helix could either inhibit Bax targeting or induce it. Furthermore, mutating proline 168, immediately upstream of the tail anchor, prevented Bax translocation during both staurosporine-induced cell death and anoikis and abolished its apoptotic activity.23, 24 A model developed with mitochondrial targeting of Bax occurring when an activated BH3-only protein, such as tBid, induced reorientation of the tail anchor from the surface groove, with proline 168 at the hinge, exposing it. However, the NMR structure indicates that the energy required to release the hydrophobic tail into an aqueous environment is too great to be explained by the proposed Bax/tBid BH3–domain interaction.34 Another scenario is that the tail anchor unfolds when in close proximity to a lipid bilayer. Thus, Bax targeting may occur prior to TMD reorientation, and may require mitochondrial receptors. Mitochondrial proteins are required for Bax to oligomerise in mitochondria, but not in synthetic liposomes,35, 36 and two recent reports identify interactions between Bax and TOM proteins.21, 37 A study utilising mitochondria from yeast that were either treated with proteases to remove the GIP or derived from mutants for various TOM proteins indicated that a functional GIP was not required for Bax-dependent MOMP.38 However, another study using similar yeast mutants came to the opposite conclusion, and loss of functional Tom40 or Tom22 inhibited Bax-induced cytochrome c release.37 A role for TOM proteins does not exclude a C-terminal anchor, as an amphipathic helix at either end can direct a protein to the GIP receptors. Hmi1p, a DNA helicase, has a C-terminal sequence that directs it into the mitochondrial matrix via the GIP. It remains to be seen if Bax is targeted via a receptor, but a recent study examining a variety of mitochondrial tail anchor proteins concluded that they utilised a common mechanism.39 Bax targeting does not differ fundamentally from other tail anchor proteins. How the Bax tail anchor is activated following an apoptotic signal, however, remains the central question in the regulation of this protein.
Materials and Methods
Cells
Fsk-7 mouse mammary epithelial cells were cultured as previously described.9, 24 SV40-transformed bax−/− /bak−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts (DKO MEFs) were kindly provided by Nika Danial (Dana Faber, Boston) and were grown as described.2 Human embryonic kidney 293T cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% fetal bovine serum.
Plasmids and transfections
YFP-Bax and mRFP-Bax have been previously described.9, 24 Bax deletion mutants were generated using PCR amplification with Pfu polymerase (Promega) and were ligated into pEYFP-C1 or pEGFP-N1. All mutations were confirmed by sequencing. Cells were plated onto coverslips or 60-mm dishes at 80% confluence and transfected as previously described.9 After 24 h, cells were harvested for either immunoblotting, anoikis assays or immunofluorescence.
Cell fractionation and sodium carbonate extraction
Cells were grown on 100-mm plates until ∼80% confluent and then transfected with 3.0 μg plasmid using Lipofectamine Plus (Invitrogen) as described by the manufacturer. Eighteen hours post-transfection, cells were treated with staurosporine (10 μM) or vehicle alone (DMSO) for 2–4 h and were then subfractionated. Adherent cells were scraped into hypotonic lysis buffer (10 mM Tris Cl, pH 7.5, 10 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2) containing protease inhibitors and allowed to swell on ice for 10 min prior to homogenising with a glass dounce homogeniser. MS buffer (2.5 × ; 525 mM mannitol, 175 mM sucrose, 12.5 mM Tris Cl (pH 7.5), 2.5 mM EDTA) was added to 1 × . The homogenates were centrifuged at 1300 × g for 10 min at 4 °C to pellet nuclei and unbroken cells. The supernatant was centrifuged as before and the subsequent supernatant at 17 000 × g (S17) for 15 min at 4 °C to obtain the mitochondrial pellet (P17). The S17 was centrifuged at 100 000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C to produce the cytosolic fraction. The P17 fraction was then washed once with 1 × MS buffer and then solubilised in 0.1 M Na2CO3 for 30 min on ice. After centrifugation at 100 000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, the supernatant (alkali-soluble fraction) was titrated to neutral pH with HCl. The pellet (alkali-resistant fraction) was solubilised in SDS sample buffer. The presence of YFP-tagged proteins was detected by immunoblotting for GFP.
Blue native-PAGE
Blue native-PAGE was carried out essentially as described by Brookes et al.40 Crude mitochondrial fractions were prepared and membrane proteins extracted in 1% CHAPS, 10% glycerol, 0.5 M aminocaproic acid in 50 mM Bis/Tris, pH 7.0. The first-dimension BN-PAGE was then resolved in the second dimension by conventional SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted.
Antibodies and immunoblotting
Protein from subcellular fractions, transfections, and sodium carbonate extractions were resolved on 12% SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose and then subjected to immunoblotting. Polyclonal anti-Bax NT (06–499) was from Upstate Biotechnology. Antiactive caspase-3 was from R&D systems. Polyclonal anti-GFP (A11122) was from Molecular Probes. Monoclonal mtHsp 70 (MA3-028) was from Affinity Bioreagents. Anti-APAF-1 (AAP-300) was from Stressgen. Following primary antibody incubation, detection was performed using peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (Jackson ImmunoResearch) and chemiluminesence (Pierce).
Immunofluorescence and imaging
Anoikis was induced in FSK-7 cells by trypsinising them and plating them onto dishes coated with poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate in complete growth media. To image-detached FSK-7 cells, they were cytospun onto polysine slides as previously described.9 Apoptosis was induced in DKO MEFs via treatment with 10 μM staurosporine (Calbiochem) in DMSO for the time indicated. Cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde in PBS and permeabilised with 0.5% Triton X-100/PBS. Primary antibodies were incubated in PBS/0.1% Triton X-100/0.1% horse serum (1 h, 37 °C). Following washing in PBS, secondary goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit Cy5, Cy2 or RhodamineRx conjugates were incubated in above buffer (30 min, 37 °C). Where indicated, nuclei were stained with 1 μg/ml Hoechst 33258. Images were collected on an Olympus microscope, equipped with a Deltavision imaging system, using a × 100 PLAN-APO 1.4NA objective. Images were processed by constrained iterative deconvolution using softWoRx™ (Applied Precision). Apoptosis was quantified by assessing nuclear morphology in transfected cells using an Axioplan2 microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging Inc.). Transfected cells were identified by YFP or mRFP fluorescence, and nuclear morphology assessed following staining with Hoechst. For each time point, approximately 300 cells were counted, and each experiment was performed in triplicate. Time course apoptosis assays were analysed with two-way ANOVA with Bonferronis post-test to obtain P-values, using Prism 4 software (GraphPad).
Abbreviations
- APAF-1:
-
apopotic protease-activating factor 1
- BN-PAGE:
-
blue native polyacrylamide electrophoresis
- DKO:
-
double-knockout
- ECM:
-
extracellular matrix
- GFP:
-
green fluorescent protein
- GIP:
-
general import pore
- MOMP:
-
mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilisation
- mRFP:
-
monomeric red fluorescent protein
- mtHsp70:
-
mitochondrial heat shock protein 70
- OMM:
-
outer mitochondrial membrane
- poly-HEMA:
-
poly-2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate
- SMAC:
-
second mitochondrial activator of caspases
- TIM:
-
translocase inner membrane
- TMD:
-
transmembrane domain
- TOM:
-
translocase outer membane
- YFP:
-
yellow fluorescent protein
- zVADfmk:
-
benzyloxycarbonyl-Val-Ala-Asp-fluoromethane
References
Cory S, Adams JM . The Bcl2 family: regulators of the cellular life-or-death switch. Nat Rev Cancer 2002; 2: 647–656.
Wei MC, Zong WX, Cheng EH, Lindsten T, Panoutsakopoulou V, Ross AJ et al. Proapoptotic BAX and BAK: a requisite gateway to mitochondrial dysfunction and death. Science 2001; 292: 727–730.
Gilmore AP, Metcalfe AM, Romer LH, Streuli CH . Integrin-mediated survival signals regulate the apoptotic function of Bax through its conformation and subcellular localization. J Cell Biol 2000; 149: 431–445.
Goping IS, Gross A, Lavoie JN, Nguyen M, Jemmerson R, Roth K et al. Regulated targeting of BAX to mitochondria. J Cell Biol 1998; 143: 207–215.
Antonsson B, Montessuit S, Sanchez B, Martinou JC . Bax is present as a high molecular weight oligomer/complex in the mitochondrial membrane of apoptotic cells. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 11615–11623.
Desagher S, Osen Sand A, Nichols A, Eskes R, Montessuit S, Lauper S et al. Bid-induced conformational change of Bax is responsible for mitochondrial cytochrome c release during apoptosis. J Cell Biol 1999; 144: 891–901.
Eskes R, Desagher S, Antonsson B, Martinou JC . Bid induces the oligomerization and insertion of Bax into the outer mitochondrial membrane. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20: 929–935.
Hsu YT, Wolter KG, Youle RJ . Cytosol-to-membrane redistribution of Bax and Bcl-X(L) during apoptosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997; 94: 3668–3672.
Valentijn AJ, Metcalfe AD, Kott J, Streuli CH, Gilmore AP . Spatial and temporal changes in Bax subcellular localization during anoikis. J Cell Biol 2003; 162: 599–612.
Wolter KG, Hsu YT, Smith CL, Nechushtan A, Xi XG, Youle RJ . Movement of Bax from the cytosol to mitochondria during apoptosis. J Cell Biol 1997; 139: 1281–1292.
Pfanner N, Geissler A . Versatility of the mitochondrial protein import machinery. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001; 2: 339–349.
Borgese N, Brambillasca S, Colombo S . How tails guide tail-anchored proteins to their destinations. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2007; 19: 368–375.
Horie C, Suzuki H, Sakaguchi M, Mihara K . Characterization of signal that directs C-tail-anchored proteins to mammalian mitochondrial outer membrane. Mol Biol Cell 2002; 13: 1615–1625.
Kaufmann T, Schlipf S, Sanz J, Neubert K, Stein R, Borner C . Characterization of the signal that directs Bcl-x(L), but not Bcl-2, to the mitochondrial outer membrane. J Cell Biol 2003; 160: 53–64.
Schinzel A, Kaufmann T, Borner C . Bcl-2 family members: intracellular targeting, membrane-insertion, and changes in subcellular localization. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004; 1644: 95–105.
Oltvai ZN, Milliman CL, Korsmeyer SJ . Bcl-2 heterodimerizes in vivo with a conserved homolog, Bax, that accelerates programmed cell death. Cell 1993; 74: 609–619.
Cartron PF, Arokium H, Oliver L, Meflah K, Manon S, Vallette FM . Distinct domains control the addressing and the insertion of Bax into mitochondria. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 10587–10598.
Cartron PF, Priault M, Oliver L, Meflah K, Manon S, Vallette FM . The N-terminal end of Bax contains a mitochondrial-targeting signal. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 11633–11641.
Cartron PF, Moreau C, Oliver L, Mayat E, Meflah K, Vallette FM . Involvement of the N-terminus of Bax in its intracellular localization and function. FEBS Lett 2002; 512: 95–100.
Tremblais K, Oliver L, Juin P, Le Cabellec TM, Meflah K, Vallette FM . The C-terminus of bax is not a membrane addressing/anchoring signal. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999; 260: 582–591.
Bellot G, Cartron PF, Er E, Oliver L, Juin P, Armstrong LC et al. TOM22, a core component of the mitochondria outer membrane protein translocation pore, is a mitochondrial receptor for the proapoptotic protein Bax. Cell Death Differ 2007; 14: 785–794.
Nechushtan A, Smith CL, Hsu YT, Youle RJ . Conformation of the Bax C-terminus regulates subcellular location and cell death. EMBO J 1999; 18: 2330–2341.
Schinzel A, Kaufmann T, Schuler M, Martinalbo J, Grubb D, Borner C . Conformational control of Bax localization and apoptotic activity by Pro168. J Cell Biol 2004; 164: 1021–1032.
Upton JP, Valentijn AJ, Zhang L, Gilmore AP . The N-terminal conformation of Bax regulates cell commitment to apoptosis. Cell Death Differ 2007; 14: 932–942.
Susin SA, Lorenzo HK, Zamzami N, Marzo I, Snow BE, Brothers GM et al. Molecular characterization of mitochondrial apoptosis-inducing factor. Nature 1999; 397: 441–446.
Kratz E, Eimon PM, Mukhyala K, Stern H, Zha J, Strasser A et al. Functional characterization of the Bcl-2 gene family in the zebrafish. Cell Death Differ 2006; 13: 1631–1640.
Millar DG, Shore GC . Mitochondrial Mas70p signal anchor sequence. Mutations in the transmembrane domain that disrupt dimerization but not targeting or membrane insertion. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 12229–12232.
Jeong SY, Gaume B, Lee YJ, Hsu YT, Ryu SW, Yoon SH et al. Bcl-x(L) sequesters its C-terminal membrane anchor in soluble, cytosolic homodimers. EMBO J 2004; 23: 2146–2155.
Nechushtan A, Smith CL, Lamensdorf I, Yoon SH, Youle RJ . Bax and Bak coalesce into novel mitochondria-associated clusters during apoptosis. J Cell Biol 2001; 153: 1265–1276.
Ruffolo SC, Shore GC . BCL-2 selectively interacts with the BID-induced open conformer of BAK, inhibiting BAK auto-oligomerization. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 25039–25045.
Tan C, Dlugosz PJ, Peng J, Zhang Z, Lapolla SM, Plafker SM et al. Auto-activation of the apoptosis protein Bax increases mitochondrial membrane permeability and is inhibited by Bcl-2. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 14764–14775.
Abell BM, Rabu C, Leznicki P, Young JC, High S . Post-translational integration of tail-anchored proteins is facilitated by defined molecular chaperones. J Cell Sci 2007; 120: 1743–1751.
Stefanovic S, Hegde RS . Identification of a targeting factor for posttranslational membrane protein insertion into the ER. Cell 2007; 128: 1147–1159.
Suzuki M, Youle RJ, Tjandra N . Structure of Bax: coregulation of dimer formation and intracellular localization. Cell 2000; 103: 645–654.
Kuwana T, Mackey MR, Perkins G, Ellisman MH, Latterich M, Schneiter R et al. Bid, Bax, and lipids cooperate to form supramolecular openings in the outer mitochondrial membrane. Cell 2002; 111: 331–342.
Roucou X, Montessuit S, Antonsson B, Martinou JC . Bax oligomerization in mitochondrial membranes requires tBid (caspase-8-cleaved Bid) and a mitochondrial protein. Biochem J 2002; 368: 915–921.
Ott M, Norberg E, Walter KM, Schreiner P, Kemper C, Rapaport D et al. The mitochondrial TOM complex is required for tBid/Bax-induced cytochrome c release. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 27633–27639.
Sanjuan Szklarz LK, Kozjak-Pavlovic V, Vogtle FN, Chacinska A, Milenkovic D, Vogel S et al. Preprotein transport machineries of yeast mitochondrial outer membrane are not required for Bax-induced release of intermembrane space proteins. J Mol Biol 2007; 368: 44–54.
Setoguchi K, Otera H, Mihara K . Cytosolic factor- and TOM-independent import of C-tail-anchored mitochondrial outer membrane proteins. EMBO J 2006; 25: 5635–5647.
Brookes PS, Pinner A, Ramachandran A, Coward L, Barnes S, Kim H et al. High throughput two-dimensional blue-native electrophoresis: a tool for functional proteomics of mitochondria and signaling complexes. Proteomics 2002; 2: 969–977.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust. J-P U was supported by a studentship from the BBSRC. We thank Fiona Foster and Thomas Owens for comments on the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Edited by L Scorrano
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Valentijn, A., Upton, JP., Bates, N. et al. Bax targeting to mitochondria occurs via both tail anchor-dependent and -independent mechanisms. Cell Death Differ 15, 1243–1254 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2008.39
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2008.39
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
BAX-Depleted Retinal Ganglion Cells Survive and Become Quiescent Following Optic Nerve Damage
Molecular Neurobiology (2020)
-
Completion of BAX recruitment correlates with mitochondrial fission during apoptosis
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Topology of active, membrane-embedded Bax in the context of a toroidal pore
Cell Death & Differentiation (2018)
-
Bax retrotranslocation potentiates Bcl-xL’s antiapoptotic activity and is essential for switch-like transitions between MOMP competency and resistance
Cell Death & Disease (2018)
-
Bax targets mitochondria by distinct mechanisms before or during apoptotic cell death: a requirement for VDAC2 or Bak for efficient Bax apoptotic function
Cell Death & Differentiation (2014)