Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Donor Safety

Hematopoietic stem cell donation: psychological perspectives of pediatric sibling donors and their parents

Bone Marrow Transplantation volume 50, pages 1337–1342 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is widely used for treatment of various life-threatening pediatric diseases. It is an intensive process that psychologically affects the whole family. Pediatric donors represent a very unique, underreported, group. The aim of this study is to investigate the sibling donors’ and their parents’ perspective on the donation process. The cohort included 36 sibling donors and 50 parents of pediatric patients who underwent allogeneic SCT between 1995 and 2010 and were alive at the time of the study. Mean age at donation was 14.78±8.350 years in donors’ group and 8.22±4.639 years in parents’ group. Data were collected by anonymous questionnaires. Three psychological dimensions were analyzed: donors’ personal perspective; donor–recipient interpersonal relationship and the influence of the donation on the family unit. Results showed that the donors experienced a wide range of complex emotional responses, positive and negative, whereas the parents’ responses were mainly positive and less complex. This study presents both the sibling donor’s and parents’ perspective, giving a more complete picture of the donation process within the family. The effects of this intense experience of SCT has a long-term impact on the whole family, indicating the need for follow-up and psychosocial support.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Aljurf M, Pasquini MC, Bouzas LF, Yoshimi A et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a global perspective. JAMA 2010; 303: 1617–1624.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Peters C, Gaspar HB, Cesaro S, Dreger P et al. Hematopoietic SCT in Europe: data and trends in 2012 with special consideration of pediatric transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2014; 49: 744–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Bader P, Bonini C, Cesaro S, Dreger P et al. Hematopoietic SCT in Europe 2013: recent trends in the use of alternative donors showing more haploidentical donors but fewer cord blood transplants. Bone Marrow Transplant 2015; 50: 476–482.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pentz RD, Alderfer MA, Pelletier W, Stegenga K, Haight AE, Hendershot KA et al. Unmet needs of siblings of pediatric stem cell transplant recipients. Pediatrics 2014; 133: e1156–e1162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McDonald FE, Patterson P, White KJ, Butow P, Bell ML . Predictors of unmet needs and psychological distress in adolescent and young adult siblings of people diagnosed with cancer. Psychooncology 2015; 24: 333–340.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamama R, Ronen T, Feigin R . Self-control anxiety, and loneliness in siblings of children with cancer. Soc Work Health Care 2000; 31: 63–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Houtzager BA, Oort FJ, Hoekstra-Weebers JE, Caron HN, Grootenhuis MA, Last BF . Coping and family functioning predict longitudinal psychological adaptation of siblings of childhood cancer patients. J Pediatr Psychol 2004; 29: 591–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Munzenberger N, Fortanier C, Macquart-Moulin G, Faucher C, Novakovitch G, Maraninchi D et al. Psychosocial aspects of haematopoietic stem cell donation for allogeneic transplantation: how family donors cope with this experience. Psychooncology 1999; 8: 55–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Williams S, Green R, Morrison A, Watson D, Buchanan S . The psychosocial aspects of donating blood stem cells: the sibling donor perspective. J Clin Apher 2003; 18: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pulsipher MA, Nagler A, Iannone R, Nelson RM . Weighing the risks of G-CSF administration, leukopheresis, and standard marrow harvest: ethical and safety considerations for normal pediatric hematopoietic cell donors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006; 46: 422–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pentz RD, Haight AE, Noll RB, Barfield R, Pelletier W, Davies S et al. The ethical justification for minor sibling bone marrow donation: a case study. Oncologist 2008; 13: 148–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Bioethics. Children as hematopoietic stem cell donors. Pediatrics 2010; 125: 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bendorf A, Kerridge IH . Ethical issues in bone marrow transplantation in children. J Paediatr Child Health 2011; 47: 614–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Styczynski J, Balduzzi A, Gil L, Labopin M, Hamladji RM, Marktel S et al. Risk of complications during hematopoietic stem cell collection in pediatric sibling donors: a prospective European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Pediatric Diseases Working Party study. Blood 2012; 119: 2935–2942.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pulsipher MA, Levine JE, Hayashi RJ, Chan KW, Anderson P, Duerst R et al. Safety and efficacy of allogeneic PBSC collection in normal pediatric donors: the pediatric blood and marrow transplant consortium experience (PBMTC) 1996-2003. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35: 361–367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiener LS, Steffen-Smith E, Battles HB, Wayne A, Love CP, Fry T . Sibling stem cell donor experiences at a single institution. Psychooncology 2008; 17: 304–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Packman W, Gong K, VanZutphen K, Shaffer T, Crittenden M . Psychosocial adjustment of adolescent siblings of hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs 2004; 21: 233–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wilkins KL, Woodgate RL . Supporting siblings through the pediatric bone marrow transplant trajectory: perspectives of siblings of bone marrow transplant recipients. Cancer Nurs 2007; 30: E29–E34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Packman W . Psychosocial impact of pediatric BMT on siblings. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 24: 701–706.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bauk K, D'Auria JP, Andrews A, Presler CM . The pediatric sibling donor experience in hematopoietic stem cell transplant: an integrative review of the literature. J Pediatr Nurs 2013; 28: 235–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bowen M. The use of family theory in clinical practice In: Family Theory in Clinical Practice. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc., 2004 pp 151–155.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Packman W, Weber S, Wallace J, Bugescu N . Psychological effects of hematopoietic SCT on pediatric patients, siblings and parents: a review. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 45: 1134–1146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pillay B, Lee SJ, Katona L, De Bono S, Warren N, Fletcher J et al. The psychosocial impact of haematopoietic SCT on sibling donors. Bone Marrow Transplant 2012; 47: 1361–1365.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. MacLeod KD, Whitsett SF, Mash EJ, Pelletier W . Pediatric sibling donors of successful and unsuccessful hematopoietic stem cell transplants (HSCT): a qualitative study of their psychosocial experience. J Pediatr Psychol 2003; 28: 223–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Packman C, Crittenden MR, Rieger Fischer JB, Schaeffer E, Bongar B, Cowan MJ . Siblings' perceptions of the bone marrow transplantation process. J Psychosoc Oncol 1997; 15: 81–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pentz RD, Pelletier W, Alderfer MA, Stegenga K, Fairclough DL, Hinds PS . Shared decision-making in pediatric allogeneic blood and marrow transplantation: what if there is no decision to make? Oncologist 2012; 17: 881–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. A Toren and B Bielorai: These two authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology and BMT, Edmond and Lily Safra Children Hospital, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Ramat Gan, Israel

    D Hutt, M Nehari, D Munitz-Shenkar, A Toren & B Bielorai

  2. Social Sciences Faculty, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    Y Alkalay

  3. Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel

    A Toren & B Bielorai

Authors
  1. D Hutt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M Nehari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D Munitz-Shenkar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Y Alkalay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. A Toren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. B Bielorai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D Hutt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hutt, D., Nehari, M., Munitz-Shenkar, D. et al. Hematopoietic stem cell donation: psychological perspectives of pediatric sibling donors and their parents. Bone Marrow Transplant 50, 1337–1342 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2015.152

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2015.152

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links