Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Clinical Trials

Phase-2 trial of an intensified conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for poor-risk leukemia

Abstract

Patients with poor-risk leukemia have a high relapse rate despite allogeneic transplant. We report on the phase-2 trial of an intensified allogeneic transplant regimen whose aim was tolerable toxicity and durable remission. Study patients (n=30) had unfavorable first remission cytogenetics, progression from myelodysplasia or active disease due to induction failure or relapse. Conditioning was i.v. BU, targeted to a first-dose plasma area under the curve (AUC) of 700–900 μM min, VP-16 at 30 mg/kg of adjusted ideal body weight and fractionated TBI (FTBI) at 1200 cGy in 10 fractions. GVHD prophylaxis was CsA and mycophenolate mofetil. Regimen-related toxicities (Bearman) included grade II mucositis in 29 patients (97%) and grade III in one patient, grade II–III sinusoidal obstructive syndrome in 2 patients (7%), and grade 2–3 (CTC) skin toxicity in 8 patients (27%). The 30- and 100-day TRMs were 0 and 7% respectively. The median follow-up was 83.7 months (60.7–96.4) for surviving patients. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival was 40% for all patients. Cumulative 5-year relapse incidence (RI) was 23% and TRM was 37%. We have shown promising OS and RI in these poor-risk patients, who typically have few curative options.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Blume KG, Kopecky KJ, Henslee-Downey JP, Forman SJ, Stiff PJ, LeMaistre CF et al. A prospective randomized comparison of total body irradiation-etoposide versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide as preparatory regimens for bone marrow transplantation in patients with leukemia who were not in first remission: a Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood 1993; 81: 2187–2193.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giralt SA, LeMaistre CF, Vriesendorp HM, Andersson BS, Dimopoulos M, Gajewski J et al. Etoposide, cyclophosphamide, total-body irradiation, and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1923–1930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hirabayashi N, Goto S, Ishii M, Yuge M, Mitsuma A, Noda N . Busulfan, cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation as conditioning for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute and chronic myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21: 1079–1083.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lynch MH, Petersen FB, Appelbaum FR, Bensinger WI, Clift RA, Storb R et al. Phase II study of busulfan, cyclophosphamide and fractionated total body irradiation as a preparatory regimen for allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in patients with advanced myeloid malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 59–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mengarelli A, Iori A, Guglielmi C, Romano A, Cerretti R, Torromeo C et al. Standard versus alternative myeloablative conditioning regimens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for high-risk acute leukemia. Haematologica 2002; 87: 52–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang TT, Gulati SC, Chou TC, Vega R, Gandola L, Ibrahim SM et al. Synergistic effect of 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide and etoposide on a human promyelocytic leukemia cell line (HL-60) demonstrated by computer analysis. Cancer Res 1985; 45: 2434–2439.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stein A, O’Donnell MR, Parker P, Snyder DS, Nademanee A, Krishnan A et al. Phase I-II study of escalating doses of busulfan (BU) in combination with fractioned total body irradiation (FTBI) and etoposide (VP-16) as a preparative regimen for allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) for patients with advanced leukemias. Blood (ASH Meeting Abstracts) 1998; 92: Abstract # 517.

  8. Nguyen L, Leger F, Lennon S, Puozzo C . Intravenous busulfan in adults prior to haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a population pharmacokinetic study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2006; 57: 191–198.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kroger N, Zabelina T, Sonnenberg S, Kruger W, Renges H, Stute N et al. Dose-dependent effect of etoposide in combination with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide as conditioning for stem cell transplantation in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 26: 711–716.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Leith CP, Kopecky KJ, Godwin J, McConnell T, Slovak ML, Chen IM et al. Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: assessment of multidrug resistance (MDR1) and cytogenetics distinguishes biologic subgroups with remarkably distinct responses to standard chemotherapy. A Southwest Oncology Group study. Blood 1997; 89: 3323–3329.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pullarkat V, Slovak ML, Kopecky KJ, Forman SJ, Appelbaum FR . Impact of cytogenetics on the outcome of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Southwest Oncology Group 9400 study. Blood 2008; 111: 2563–2572.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Vardiman JW, Harris NL, Brunning RD . The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of the myeloid neoplasms. Blood 2002; 100: 2292–2302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parimon T, Au DH, Martin PJ, Chien JW . A risk score for mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Ann Intern Med 2006; 144: 407–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chen TL, Grochow LB, Hurowitz LA, Brundrett RB . Determination of busulfan in human plasma by gas chromatography with electron-capture detection. J Chromatogr 1988; 425: 303–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Breslow NE, Day NE . Statistical methods in cancer research: volume II, the design and analysis of cohort studies. IARC Sci Publ 1987; 82: 1–406.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prentice RL, Kalbfleisch JD, Peterson Jr AV, Flournoy N, Farewell VT, Breslow NE . The analysis of failure times in the presence of competing risks. Biometrics 1978; 34: 541–554.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gray RJ . A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 1988; 16: 1140–1154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cox DR . Regression models and life tables. J R Stat Soc 1972; B34: 187–220.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fine JP, Gray RJ . A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Stat Assoc 1999; 94: 496–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bearman SI, Appelbaum FR, Buckner CD, Petersen FB, Fisher LD, Clift RA et al. Regimen-related toxicity in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. J Clin Oncol 1988; 6: 1562–1568.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Linker CA, Ries CA, Damon LE, Rugo HS, Wolf JL . Autologous bone marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia using busulfan plus etoposide as a preparative regimen. Blood 1993; 81: 311–318.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation 1974; 18: 295–304.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Shulman HM, Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, McDonald GB, Striker GE, Sale GE et al. Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man. A long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients. Am J Med 1980; 69: 204–217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sullivan KM, Shulman HM, Storb R, Weiden PL, Witherspoon RP, McDonald GB et al. Chronic graft-versus-host disease in 52 patients: adverse natural course and successful treatment with combination immunosuppression. Blood 1981; 57: 267–276.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Copelan EA, Bechtel TP, Avalos BR, Elder PJ, Ezzone SA, Scholl MD et al. Busulfan levels are influenced by prior treatment and are associated with hepatic veno-occlusive disease and early mortality but not with delayed complications following marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 27: 1121–1124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Dean R, Rybicki LA, Sobecks RM, Copelan E, Kalaycio M, Andresen S et al. Comparison of cyclosporine and methotrexate with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil for GVHD prophylaxis in myeloablative allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Blood (ASH Meeting Abstracts) 2008; 112: Ab 2240.

  27. Cutler C, Li S, Ho VT, Koreth J, Alyea E, Soiffer RJ et al. Extended follow-up of methotrexate-free immunosuppression using sirolimus and tacrolimus in related and unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Blood 2007; 109: 3108–3114.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakamura R, Palmer J, Parker P, Stein A, Stiller T, Pullarkat V et al. Improved outcome after reduced intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome using tacroliums/siroliums-based GVHD prophylaxis. Blood (ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts) 2009; 114: 2771.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Snyder DS, Palmer J, Gaal K, Stein AS, Pullarkat V, Sahebi F et al. Improved outcomes using tacrolimus/sirolimus for graft versus host disease prophylaxis with a reduced intensity conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant as treatment of myelofibrosis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 16: 281–286.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Spielberger R, Stiff P, Bensinger W, Gentile T, Weisdorf D, Kewalramani T et al. Palifermin for oral mucositis after intensive therapy for hematologic cancers. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 2590–2598.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wong JY, Rosenthal J, Liu A, Schultheiss T, Forman S, Somlo G . Image-guided total-marrow irradiation using helical tomotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma and acute leukemia undergoing hematopoietic cell transplantation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 73: 273–279.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by grants from the National Institute of Health, CA30206 and CA33572. We would like to acknowledge the dedicated nurses of the City of Hope Bone Marrow Unit for excellent care of our patients and support of medical research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A S Stein.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stein, A., O'Donnell, M., Synold, T. et al. Phase-2 trial of an intensified conditioning regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant for poor-risk leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 46, 1256–1262 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2010.295

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2010.295

Keywords

Search

Quick links