Of all the hallmark biological features of cancer, drug resistance stands out as the harbinger of bad news for patients and oncologists alike. Cancer cells can employ several adaptive mechanisms for evading chemotherapeutic assault (Redmond et al, 2008) (Table 1). Prominent among these is mutation of the gene(s) encoding the drug targets. Unambiguous and consistent evidence for this route to escape has been provided in the recent era of therapy with small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (Gorre et al, 2001; Kosaka et al, 2006). Despite the extraordinary success of imatinib for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), many patients, particularly with more advanced disease, relapse with imatinib-resistant ABL1 mutations (Gorre et al, 2001; Branford et al, 2002; Shah et al, 2002). More than 50 distinct mutations have been described, all impairing drug binding to the ABL1 kinase domain active site (Schindler et al, 2000; Shah et al, 2002). Although such mutations have the appearance of being adaptively acquired in response to therapy, this is not the underlying mechanism. As in any Darwinian evolutionary system of natural selection, for example, speciation in ecosystems, antibiotic resistance in bacteria (Lambert et al, 2011), mutations accrue in a stochastic or random manner with respect to the functions encoded by the mutant gene. A vast majority of them are destined to remain neutral in impact and will be present in usually undetectable, small subclones. The probability of a specific drug-resistant mutation arising will be a function of the intrinsic mutability of that locus and the number of proliferative ‘at-risk’ cycles in self-renewing cancer stem cells – the necessary repository of selectable mutations (Greaves, 2013). In addition, and critically, if the cancer has acquired genetic instability, this will greatly accelerate the rate of mutation accrual. This probability of an ABL1 kinase mutation being present at diagnosis of CML has been calculated, albeit making assumptions about the above parameters, the numbers for which that will have wide confidence limits. These analyses suggested that ∼10–100% of patients with CML will have ABL1 kinase mutations on board before instigation of TKI therapy, depending upon stage of disease (Michor et al, 2005). The BCR–ABL1 kinase activity has been associated with ROS (Nieborowska-Skorska et al, 2012) and increased genetic instability or mutation frequency (Salloukh and Laneuville, 2000), and this may accelerate the rate of acquisition of ABL1 kinase mutations as well as other ‘driver’ or oncogene mutations that promote the acute or blast crisis phase of disease.
The emergence of TKI-resistant mutants, in relapse, is then the consequence of the positive selective pressure provided by the specific drugs: the rare and covert mutant clone now finds itself as a beneficiary of therapy with an enormous competitive advantage in terms of ecosystem space and resources, whereas its clonal relatives are decimated. Evidence for this sequence of events comes from the finding of low-level, drug-resistant mutations in both CML (Roche-Lestienne et al, 2002) and BCR–ABL1-positive ALL (Pfeifer et al, 2007), T-ALL (Meyer et al, 2013) or colorectal cancer (Diaz et al, 2012) before the exposure to the drugs that subsequently elicited their clonal dominance.
This much follows simple and predictable evolutionary paths. But what happens to such emergent drug-resistant clones if the therapy is then switched to a drug to which they are sensitive? The expectation is that, following de-selection, they would dramatically decline to very low levels or become extinct – depending upon the efficacy of the new drug or drug regime.
In this issue, Parker et al (2013) provide some intriguing insight into the oscillating fate of ABL1 kinase mutations. Five patients with imatinib-resistant CML were serially followed throughout switches in therapy that involved other ABL1 kinase inhibitors (dasatinib, nilotinib) or bone marrow transplantation. Although the details vary with the different patients, in principle the data illustrate that the imatinib-resistant mutant clone that predominates in initial recurrence of disease declines to undetectable levels when de-selected but can reappear when the therapy, for one reason or another, is changed again (Figure 1). The authors consider the probability that the recurrent mutant is a second, independent version of the same initial mutation but plausibly argue that this is unlikely. The result begs two questions. First, is it surprising that the mutant clone lingers on in a covert manner with its latent malignancy de-selected? The answer must be no. The new AML1 kinase inhibitor or alternative therapy may fail to eliminate all CML cells irrespective of their ABL1 kinase mutant status; plus quiescent CML stem cells, mutant or not, appear to be remarkably resistant to ABL1 kinase inhibition (Jiang et al, 2007). Hanfstein et al (2011) previously reported oscillating selection, de-selection (but regularly detectable) and re-selection in patients in whom TKIs were alternated with other chemotherapies. What is more surprising is that the de-selected clone should return to dominance in the absence of the specific drug that elicited its emergence in the first place. One possible explanation for this is that the mutant clone may have been less sensitive to the second-line TKI (O'Hare et al, 2005) and hence at a clonal level retained competitive advantage. Another is that some ABL1 kinase mutants ironically have more potent oncogenic activity (Shah et al, 2007) and this gives them the edge. Whatever the biological explanation, a clear practical inference from the observation of Parker et al (2013) is that sensitive molecular screening for residual, specific drug-resistant mutations would be informative and help dictate choice of therapy – for CML and any cancer where a limited range of resistance genotypes can emerge in response to highly targeted therapy. This would be relatively straightforward for blood-borne leukaemia cells but more demanding for solid tumours where biopsies are likely to be a biased sample of a cancer with topographical segregation of subclones (Gerlinger et al, 2012; Greaves and Maley, 2012). However, there are potential solutions to this dilemma. If a limited range of mutations are normally positively selected by therapy, then these might be detectable, before therapy, by sensitive screens of DNA fragments in plasma (Murtaza et al, 2013). Alternative generic measures of clonal diversity may provide a practical surrogate for the probability than any drug-resistant mutants exist (Mroz et al, 2013).
References
Anderson K, Lutz C, van Delft FW, Bateman CM, Guo Y, Colman SM, Kempski H, Moorman AV, Titley I, Swansbury J, Kearney L, Enver T, Greaves M (2011) Genetic variegation of clonal architecture and propagating cells in leukaemia. Nature 469: 356–361.
Branford S, Rudzki Z, Walsh S, Grigg A, Arthur C, Taylor K, Herrmann R, Lynch KP, Hughes TP (2002) High frequency of point mutations clustered within the adenosine triphosphate-binding region of BCR/ABL in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia or Ph-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia who develop imatinib (STI571) resistance. Blood 99: 3472–3475.
Diaz LA Jr, Williams RT, Wu J, Kinde I, Hecht JR, Berlin J, Allen B, Bozic I, Reiter JG, Nowak MA, Kinzler KW, Oliner KS, Vogelstein B (2012) The molecular evolution of acquired resistance to targeted EGFR blockade in colorectal cancers. Nature 486: 537–540.
Engelman JA, Zejnullahu K, Mitsudomi T, Song Y, Hyland C, Oh Park J, Lindeman N, Gale C-M, Zhao X, Christensen J, Kosaka T, Holmes AJ, Rogers AM, Cappuzzo F, Mok T, Lee C, Johnson BE, Cantley LC, Jänne PA (2007) MET amplification leads to gefitinib resistance in lung cancer by activating ERBB3 signaling. Science 316: 1039–1043.
Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, Larkin J, Endesfelder D, Gronroos E, Martinez P, Matthews N, Stewart A, Tarpet P, Varela I, Phillimore B, Begum S, McDonald NQ, Butler A, Jones D, Raine K, Latimer C, Santos CR, Nohadani M, Eklund AC, Spencer-Dene B, Clark G, Pickering L, Stamp G, Gore M, Szallasi Z, Downward J, Futreal PA, Swanton C (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N Engl J Med 366: 883–392.
Gorre ME, Mohammed M, Ellwood K, Hsu N, Paquette R, Rao PN, Sawyers CL (2001) Clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy caused by BCR-ABL gene mutation or amplification. Science 293: 876–880.
Greaves M (2013) Cancer stem cells as ‘units of selection’. Evol Appl 6: 102–108.
Greaves M, Maley CC (2012) Clonal evolution in cancer. Nature 481: 306–313.
Hanfstein B, Müller MC, Kreil S, Ernst T, Schenk T, Lorentz C, Schwindel U, Leitner A, Hehlmann R, Hochhaus A (2011) Dynamics of mutant BCR-ABL-positive clones after cessation of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. Haematologica 96: 360–366.
Jiang X, Zhao Y, Smith C, Gasparetto M, Turhan A, Eaves A, Eaves C (2007) Chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells possess multiple unique features of resistance to BCR-ABL targeted therapies. Leukemia 21: 926–935.
Kosaka T, Yatabe Y, Endoh H, Yoshida K, Hida T, Tsuboi M, Tada H, Kuwano H, Mitsudomi T (2006) Analysis of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer and acquired resistance to gefitinib. Clin Cancer Res 12: 5764–5769.
Lambert G, Estévez-Salmeron L, Oh S, Liao D, Emerson BM, Tlsty TD, Austin RH (2011) An analogy between the evolution of drug resistance in bacterial communities and malignant tissues. Nat Rev Cancer 11: 375–382.
Meyer JA, Wang J, Hogan LE, Yang JJ, Dandekar S, Patel JP, Tang Z, Zumbo P, Li S, Zavadil J, Levine RL, Cardozo T, Hunger SP, Raetz EA, Evans WE, Morrison DJ, Mason CE, Carroll WL (2013) Relapse-specific mutations in NT5C2 in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Nat Genet 45: 290–294.
Michor F, Hughes TP, Iwasa Y, Branford S, Shah NP, Sawyers CL, Nowak MA (2005) Dynamics of chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nature 435: 1267–1270.
Mroz EA, Tward AD, Pickering CR, Myers JN, Ferris RL, Rocco JW (2013) High intratumor genetic heterogeneity is related to worse outcome in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 119 (16): 3034–3042.
Murtaza M, Dawson S-J, Tsui DWY, Gale D, Forshew T, Piskorz AM, Parkinson C, Chin S-F, Kinsbury Z, Wong ASC, Marass F, Humphray S, Hadfield J, Bentley D, Chin TM, Brenton JD, Caldas C, Rosenfeld N (2013) Non-invasive analysis of acquired resistance to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA. Nature 497: 108–112.
Nieborowska-Skorska M, Kopinski PK, Ray R, Hoser G, Ngaba D, Flis S, Cramer K, Reddy MM, Koptyra M, Penserga T, Glodkowska-Mrowka E, Bolton E, Holyoake TL, Eaves CJ, Cerny-Reiterer S, Valent P, Hochhaus A, Hughes TP, van der Kuip H, Sattler M, Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W, Richardson C, Dorrance A, Stoklosa T, Williams DA, Skorski T (2012) Rac2-MRC-clll-generated ROS cause genomic instability in chronic myeloid leukemia stem cells and primitive progenitors. Blood 119: 4253–4263.
O'Hare T, Walters DK, Stoffregen EP, Jia T, Manley PW, Mestan J, Cowan-Jacob SW, Lee FY, Heinrich MC, Deininger MWN, Druker BJ (2005) In vitro activity of Bcr-Abl inhibitors AMN107 and BMS-354825 against clinically relevant imatinib-resistant Abl kinase domain mutants. Cancer Res 65: 4500–4505.
Parker WT, Yeoman AL, Jamison BA, Yeung DT, Scott HS, Hughes TP, Branford S (2013) BCR-ABL1 kinase domain mutations may persist at very low levels for many years and lead to subsequent TKI resistance. Br J Cancer 109, e-pub ahead of print 25 June 2013; doi:10.1038/bjc.2013.318.
Pfeifer H, Wassmann B, Pavlova A, Wunderle L, Oldenburg J, Binckebanck A, Lange T, Hochhaus A, Wystub S, Brück P, Hoelzer D, Ottmann OG (2007) Kinase domain mutations of BCR-ABL frequently precede imatinib-based therapy and give rise to relapse in patients with de novo Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL). Blood 110: 727–734.
Prahallad A, Sun C, Huang S, Di Nicolantonio F, Salazar R, Zecchin D, Beijersbergen RL, Bardelli A, Bernards R (2012) Unresponsiveness of colon cancer to BRAF(V600E) inhibition through feedback activation of EGFR. Nature 483: 100–103.
Redmond KM, Wilson TR, Johnston PG, Longley DB (2008) Resistance mechanisms to cancer chemotherapy. Front Biosci 13: 5138–5154.
Roche-Lestienne C, Soenen-Cornu V, Grardel-Duflos N, Laï J-L, Philippe N, Facon T, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C (2002) Several types of mutations of the Abl gene can be found in chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant to STI571, and they can pre-exist to the onset of treatment. Blood 100: 1014–1018.
Saito Y, Uchida N, Tanaka S, Suzuki N, Tomizawa-Murasawa M, Sone A, Najima Y, Takagi S, Aoki Y, Wake A, Taniguchi S, Shultz LD, Ishikawa F (2010) Induction of cell cycle entry eliminates human leukemia stem cells in a mouse model of AML. Nat Biotech 28: 275–280.
Salloukh HF, Laneuville P (2000) Increase in mutant frequencies in mice expressing the BCR-ABL activated tyrosine kinase. Leukemia 14: 1401–1404.
Schindler T, Bornmann W, Pellicena P, Miller WT, Clarkson B, Kuriyan J (2000) Structural mechanism for STI-571 inhibition of abelson tyrosine kinase. Science 289: 1938–1942.
Shah NP, Nicoll JM, Nagar B, Gorre ME, Paquette RL, Kuriyan J, Sawyers CL (2002) Multiple BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations confer polyclonal resistance to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib (STI571) in chronic phase and blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 2: 117–125.
Shah NP, Skaggs BJ, Branford S, Hughes TP, Nicoll JM, Paquette RL, Sawyers CL (2007) Sequential ABL kinase inhibitor therapy selects for compound drug-resistant BCR-ABL mutations with altered oncogenic potency. J Clin Invest 117: 2562–2569.
Sharma SV, Lee DY, Li B, Quinlan MP, Takahashi F, Maheswaran S, McDermott U, Azizian N, Zou L, Fischbach MA, Wong K-K, Brandstetter K, Wittner B, Ramaswamy S, Classon M, Settleman J (2010) A chromatin-mediated reversible drug-tolerant state in cancer cell subpopulations. Cell 141: 69–80.
Wilson TR, Fridlyand J, Yan Y, Penuel E, Burton L, Chan E, Peng J, Lin E, Wang Y, Sosman J, Ribas A, Li J, Moffat J, Sutherlin DP, Koeppen H, Merchant M, Neve R, Settleman J (2012) Widespread potential for growth-factor-driven resistance to anticancer kinase inhibitors. Nature 487: 505–509.
Workman P, Clarke PA (2011) Resisting targeted therapy: fifty ways to leave your EGFR. Cancer Cell 19: 437–440.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Greaves, M. Return of the malingering mutants. Br J Cancer 109, 1391–1393 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.490
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.490