Abstract
Bone and cartilage are being generated de novo through concerted actions of a plethora of signals. These act on stem cells (SCs) recruited for lineage-specific differentiation, with cellular phenotypes representing various functions throughout their life span. The signals are rendered by hormones and growth factors (GFs) and mechanical forces ensuring proper modelling and remodelling of bone and cartilage, due to indigenous and programmed metabolism in SCs, osteoblasts, chondrocytes, as well as osteoclasts and other cell types (eg T helper cells).
This review focuses on the concerted action of such signals, as well as the regulatory and/or stabilizing control circuits rendered by a class of small RNAs, designated microRNAs. The impact on cell functions evoked by transcription factors (TFs) via various signalling molecules, also encompassing mechanical stimulation, will be discussed featuring microRNAs as important members of an integrative system. The present approach to cell differentiation in vitro may vastly influence cell engineering for in vivo tissue repair.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Many review articles describe in detail the differentiation of osteoblasts1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and chondrocytes8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 from stem cells (SCs) following hormone and growth factor (GF) exposure, as well as mechanical stimulation, both converging towards gene regulation by transcription factors (TFs), co-activators, associated proteins and repressor molecules. However, it seems that it is still difficult to arrive at a consensus as to which parameters are more important to predict/measure true functional features needed for osteoblasts or chondrocytes to function as proper cells maintaining bone or cartilage in a 3D-structure in vivo, rendering them able to withstand challenge from immobilization, overuse and/or inflammatory processes. This paper will focus on the role of microRNA in the present enigmatic issue.
Current status of cell engineering (replacement therapy) of bone and cartilage
The necessity for an approach in order to establish interdisciplinary therapeutic strategies for the treatment of bone defects has been addressed by scientists for many years. This awareness is apparent from the multitude of approaches taken (eg GF-based therapy, gene therapy, SC-based therapy, scaffold-based therapy) to engineer tissues, integrating contributions from many medical and technical disciplines, eg immunology, biomechanics and material science14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20. The ultimate goal will be to use test-engineered cells on scaffolds in vitro and in vivo to assess the ideal, site- and environmentally adaptable phenotype and resilience of the engineered osteoblastic cells.
The use of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) for cartilaginous cell therapy and regeneration comprises at least two approaches. The first pertains to ex vivo cartilage tissue engineering, in which a replacement tissue is constructed in vitro using MSCs combined with scaffolds under appropriate environmental stimuli. The second is in vivo cartilage regeneration via MSC-based therapy using its anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects21, 22, 23, 24, 25. MSCs are expanded and injected locally into the affected joint, but can also be applied systemically. Due to their potential regenerative trophic role, they may influence the articular micro-environment and aid in the regeneration of the cartilage. However, there is no consensus as to the optimal cues for cartilage formation in vitro, be it the proper MSC source, the make of bioactive scaffolds, environmental factors for differentiation of MSCs, in vitro characteristics predictive for in vivo functioning and site-related adaptation, long term chondrocyte stabilization etc.
Importance of the osteo-chondro transition area
The process of endochondral ossification, from loose mesenchyme to initial osteoblast differentiation, entails intermediate chondrocyte differentiation. The loose mesenchymal progenitor cells proliferate and organize into the condensed mesenchyme comprised of osteo-chondral progenitor cells10. The cells of the condensed mesenchyme differentiate into chondrocytes, and the cells at the centre of the condensation stop proliferating and become hypertrophic10, 26, 27. Perichondral cells adjacent to the hypertrophic chondrocytes differentiate into osteoblasts and form the bone collar, as the invasion of blood vessels begins along with continued osteoblast differentiation10, 28, 29.
Whether or not the endochondral ossification potential is necessary to maintain in engineered chondrocytes, it may be worth while preserving the potential to vascularise, since several attempts to replace chondrocytes have failed, due to a lack of vascularization in vivo, thus stimulating the shedding of cartilage containing dead chondrocytes29, 30, 31. Furthermore, it may well be necessary to produce a fraction of chondrocytes of the hypertrophic type, since they have been shown to be involved in both cartilage and bone remodelling by secreting MMPs, ADAMs, and RANK-L 10, 32, 33.
Signalling systems in developing osteoblasts and chondrocytes
The osteoblast
The differentiation of MSCs towards osteoblasts undergoes several phases including osteoprogenitor cells, their differentiation into pre-osteoblasts and mature osteoblasts. The latter are transformed into osteocytes, which may constitute the mechano-sensing lattice and nervous system junction connecting bone to the outer “environment”2, 5, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, or they are subjected to apoptosis (Figure 1). A concerted action of both positive and negative regulatory factors determines the developing phenotype of the osteoblastic cells, including the processes of bone modelling and remodelling. This involves the concerted action of secreted RANK-L and OPG, acting on osteoclastic cells2, 4, 5, 6, 41, 42. Major functional features of the osteoblast pertain to sequential synthesis and deposition of matrix proteins and enzymes necessary to complete these processes. Finally, the transition of osteoblasts to osteocytes are also modulated by several factors (Figure 1), yielding a complete and versatile cellular system, being able to adapt to various physiological conditions, when necessary2, 5, 43.
The osteoblast commitment, differentiation and various functions are governed by several TFs, resulting in expression of phenotypic genes responsible for the acquisition of the plasticity of the osteoblastic phenotype2, 3. Runx2 and Runx3 are present in osteoblastic lineage cells. Runx2 controls bone formation during both skeletal development and post-natal life. Expression of Runx2 is both necessary and sufficient for MSC differentiation towards the osteoblastic lineage3, 4, 6, 44. The Runx regulatory element can be found in the promoter of all major genes controlling their expression, including collagen Iα1, osteopontin, BSP and osteocalcin. Runx2 can be phosphorylated and activated by the MAPK cascade by the activation of α2β1-integrins on the osteoblast surface2, 45, 46. Finally, Runx2 has been found to negatively control osteoblast proliferation by acting on p85 PIK3 and GADD45β, the latter known to be associated with cell cycle G2-M arrest47. However, Runx2 is not essential for the maintenance of the expression of major bone matrix protein genes in the mature osteoblast, since over-expression of Runx2 yields osteopenia, due to a reduced number of osteoblasts and an increased number of osteoclasts48, 49. Runx2, being considered a crucial factor in osteoblast recruitment and differentiation, is tightly controlled by other TFs, protein-DNA or protein-protein interactions. In early pre-osteoblast development, the factors Hoxa2 and Satb2 regulate Runx2 activity50. Some complex mechanisms involving factors like Stat1, Sox9, Sox8, Aj18, MEF, Nrf2, and YAP repress Runx2 expression2, 51, 52, 53, 54, while most of the published literature describes factors (Rb, TAZ, HoxA10, BAPX-1, Smad1&5, CEBP/β&δ, and Menin) actively enhancing the function of Runx22, 55, 56, 57, 58. Runx2 protein degradation may be accelerated by Smurf1, however this loss of Runx2 may be counteracted by factors like YAP, TAZ, and WWP1-Schnurri2, 59. A compilation of factors known to affect Runx2 regulation is shown in Figure 2A–2C. Of the ones depicted, some deserve further comments.
Osterix (or SP7), a zink-finger TF, acts down-stream of Runx2 and complexes with NFATc1. In turn, this co-activation stimulates the Wnt-pathway, which is considered very important for bone formation, being predictive of bone mass60, 61, 62. Wnt-protein interaction with Frizzled and LRP5/6 co-receptors enhances β-catenin phosphorylation, nuclear accumulation and enhanced gene expression promoted by the LEF/TCF1 TFs. Wnt-mediated signalling (by Wnt10b) also activates Runx2, osterix, and Dlx5 expression2, 6, 41, 63, 64.
Cyclic AMP, a long “forgotten” second messenger in this field, also appears to be involved in bone formation. ATF4 (or CREB type 2) interacts with Runx2 to stimulate osteocalcin expression, while also enhancing the amino acid transport into osteoblasts. The latter system stimulates protein synthesis in bone65, 66, where essential amino acid loading seems to be very important for maximizing peak bone mass67, 68. Some homeo-box proteins, like Msx1&2, Dlx5&6 play a role in osteoblast differentiation. Msx2 inhibits Runx2-mediated differentiation, while Dlx5 activates the expression of Runx269, 70, 71, 72. Furthermore, some helix-loop-helix proteins, like Id and Twist are appearing during osteoblast proliferation, of which Twist controls Runx2 expression73, 74. PPARγ2 may interact with Runx2 to induce adipocyte differentiation2, 75. PPARγ2-agonists, which are used to enhance insulin secretion and restore insulin sensitivity in diabetic patients, may thus disfavour bone mass maintenance. Other TFs involved in adipocyte differentiation are the C/EBPs, which may also down-regulate the effect of Runx2 on MSC-acquisition of the osteoblast phenotype76, 77.
In general, several hormones and growth factors (GFs) are involved in osteoblast differentiation, and of those, PTH, oestrogen, glucocorticoids, PGE2, calcitriol, BMP-2, TGFβ, FGF-2, and IGF-1 impinge on signalling cascades converging towards mechanisms of action involving the TFs mentioned above, along with nuclear co-modulators and associated proteins1, 2, 14, 15, 21, 35, 39, 78, 79. Certain of these GFs have served as standards in the differentiation of MSCs towards osteoblastic cells for cellular therapy. Some of these signalling systems will be outlined in a later paragraph.
The chondrocyte
Formation of cartilage is initiated by the differentiation of MSCs into chondrocytes, which proceed through chondroprogenitor cells with final terminal differentiation of chondrocytes, vascular invasion and cartilage matrix calcification, and finally ossification8, 10, 11, 80, 81. Many signals appear to be stimulatory, however, some are also inhibitory of this process (Figure 3). The chondrocytes synthesize many matrix products, enzymes to degrade them, as well as RANK-L. Stimulation of osteoclasts is confined to hypertrophic chondrocytes, sharing many phenotypical features with the osteoblast9, 10, 12, 13, 32.
Skeletal elements are prefigured in mesenchymal condensations, and common precursor mesenchymal cells divide into chondrogenic and myogenic lineages. The cartilaginous nodules appear in the middle of the blastema, and simultaneously, cells at the periphery become flattened and elongated to form the perichondrium. The differentiated chondrocytes can then proliferate to undergo the complex process of hypertrophic maturation10, 82, 83. The initiation of condensation is associated with increased hyaluronidase activity and the appearance of cell adhesion molecules, neural cadherin and neural adhesion molecules (N-CAM). TGFβ, which is among the earliest signals in chondrogenic condensation, stimulates synthesis of fibronectin, which in turn regulates N-CAM10, 84, 85. A current view is that a series of patterning systems functions sequentially over time. FGF, hedgehog, BMPs and the Wnt-pathways coordinate signalling through three axes to secure correct patterning along the dorso-ventral and the anterior-posterior axes86, 87. Important signalling molecules in this respect are Wnt2A, Wnt2C, Wnt3A, Wnt7A, FGF-10, and FGF-8. The FGFs induce Wnts, which act through the β-catenin pathway in osteoblasts, while mainly through JUNC and PKC signalling in chondrocytes88, 89. These early events involve homeobox transcription factors (TFs) like HoxA, HoxD (especially HoxD11&13) and Gli382, 87, 90, 91, 92 in a sequential manner. Apart from initiating chondrocyte differentiation, the BMPs (eg type 2, 4, and 7) co-ordinately induce chondrocyte hypertrophy in concert with BMP receptors and BMP antagonists, like chordin and noggin87, 93, 94.
The chondrocyte differentiation process is characterized by deposition of a cartilage matrix consisting of collagens II, IX and X and aggrecan, regulated by a family of SOX-proteins, namely the transcription factors Sox9, L-Sox5, and Sox685, 95, 96. The expression of SOX-proteins is dependent on BMP-signalling via BMPR1A&B, which are actively expressed in condensating chondrocytes97, 98. Runx2 expression also appears in all chondrocytes undergoing terminal differentiation, and BMP-induced signalling involves the canonical SMAD pathway, including the Runx2-activating Smads1, 5&899, 100.
Throughout chondrogenesis, BMPs and FGFs determine the rate of proliferation, thereby adjusting the pace of differentiation101. Proliferation of chondrocytes in the growth plate is regulated by FGFs through signalling converging towards the cyclin D1 gene. This effect is balanced through FGFR3, which inhibits proliferation by Stat1-mediated transcription of the cell cycle inhibitor p21102, 103. The proliferation in the lower proliferative and pre-hypertrophic zones is controlled by negative feed-back loops involving PTHrP and Ihh. PTHrP acts through PKA- and PKC-mediated signalling, while Ihh employs a set of Gli transcription factor (Gli1-3) to modulate proliferation, in order to balance the number of chondrocytes being recruited to the hypertrophic stage92, 104, 105.
Hypertrophic chondrocytes express collagen X, ALP, positively regulated by Runx2, which interacts with Smad126, 27. Runx2 is also instrumental in the synthesis and secretion of MMP-13 (acting synergistically with MMP-9), thus initiating cartilage matrix remodelling and ensuring angiogenesis, which is necessary for the replacement of cartilage by bone10, 28, 98, 106. One signal responsible for angiogenesis is VEGF through receptors like Flk, Npn1, and Npn2. Runx2 is also acting in concert with AP-1 family members during cytokine- and PTHrP-induced MMP-13 expression in both chondrocytes and osteoblasts28, 106, 107. In the hypertrophic chondrocyte, one may find many of the features of osteoblasts including a complex Runx2 regulated system (Figure 3).
Mechano-stimulation
Mechano-stimulation is important for the net building of bone mass and cartilage on a long term basis39, 40, 108, 109, 110. The loads which arise from functional activity generate deformation in bone and cartilage tissue through pressure in the intramedullary cavity and within cortices, transient pressure waves, shear forces through canaliculi and even dynamic electric fields as interstitial fluid flows past charged bone crystals111. During vigorous activities, peak strain magnitude measured in the load-bearing regions of the skeleton of adult species are ranging from 2000 to 3500 micro-strain (μɛ)=2000×1/1 000 000 change in cell length/diameter 112.
These mechanical forces render cells in the bone modelling mode. The remodelling and disuse modalities lie below this threshold and yield either zero net bone production or bone loss. It has been shown that both immobilization and overuse will lead to loss of both tissue types39, 40, 109, 110. Many cell types display different, but measurable elasticity in cell cultures (eg chondrocytes=0.5−8 kpA, depending on where it is situated (endothelial or articular) and osteoblasts=1−2 kpA) indicating that there are certain forces needed to observe a certain indentation in the cells depending on the matrix and orientation of the cells within it113. However, these shape alterations are conveyed by external devices (like matrix proteins) and picked up by mechano-receptors linked to the same signalling systems known to regulate cell differentiation and induction of functional characteristics111. But pressure may have different effects than strain: chondrocytes subjected to cyclical tension caused an increase in MMP-13 and decreased TIMP-1, while cyclical hydrostatic pressure increased TIMP-1 and decreased MMP-13. Normally, cyclical exposure of cells to pressure or strain may be essentially anabolic, while chronic exposure might lead to loss of both bone and cartilage, even when the level of micro-strain applied is intermediary or low114.
In the present paragraph, we focus on the signalling systems picking up the mechanical stimuli reaching bone and cartilaginous tissues. In osteoblasts, both shear and strain forces have, since long been known to be implicated in modulating proliferation115, 116, differentiation (via Runx2, osterix, β-catenin)116, 117, bone remodelling (via RANK-L osteoprotegerin=OPG)111, 118, 119, cytokine secretion (via PGE2, NO)119, 120, 121 and activation of genes related to secretion of matrix proteins (like osteopontin, collagenase-3)122, 123. Apparently, several signalling systems are involved in the mechano-stimulation of osteoblasts and chondrocytes, many of which are common to those used by hormones and GFs111. MAPK is activated by stretch and shear forces in many cell types, including osteoblasts, stromal cells and osteocytes, as well as chondrocytes and alveoblasts. Stromal cells exposed to mechanical forces secrete RANK-L, which stimulates osteoclastogenesis, however, mature osteoclasts seem to be responding to increased mechano-stimulation by enhancing their bone resorbing potential118, 124, 125. Vascular cells and stromal cells in bone release NO (a second messenger activating a soluble guanylate cyclase), which may reach many adjacent cells through its rapid diffusion and high lipid penetrability119, 126.
Candidate mechano-receptors are ion channels, integrins and integrin-associated proteins, connexins and other membrane based structures111, 127, 128, 129. The ion channels involved are mechano-sensitive channels susceptive to gadolinium chloride and nifedipine, respectively111, and the former drug reduced mechanically elevated PGI2 and NO synthesis130. The β1-integrin binds ligands like collagens I & III and fibronectin131, and fluid flow has been shown to activate MAPK via β1-integrin. In osteoblasts, steady fluid forces up-regulate β1-integrin expression and activate αvβ3, which co-localizes with src132, 133, 134. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) seems to be critical for integrin clustering, while also being a signalling molecule, which is subjected to auto-phosphorylation135, 136. Thereafter, FAK contributes to MAPK activation via interaction with c-src, Grb2, and Ras136, 137, 138. FAK activation also increases the activity of PLCγ1, which is involved in Ca2+-fluxes, since fluid force elicited Ca2+-mobilization requires PLC-mediated IP3-release111. Shear stress has been shown to increase the expression of connexins, making cells more communicative through gap junctions111. These channels are often located to dendritic processes, and osteocytes have been shown to increase PGE2 (an anabolic bone factor), when mechanically stimulated111, 129, 139. Membrane structures, like lipid rafts, have also been shown to integrate mechano-stimulation, conveying the signal to the cell interior140, 141. Mechanical forces translocate signalling molecules to the cavaolae, involving activation of signalling molecules like MAPKs, such as ERK1/2, small GTPases, GEFs, RhoA, and Rac1142, 143.
In general, mechano-stimulation will activate many of the same signalling systems like, for example, VEGF-mediated MAPK-enhancement and cAMP/cGMP- and DAG/IP3-mediated signalling118, 144, 145, 146(Figure 4). In osteoblasts, mechano-stimulation increases both cAMP and IP3 levels. Cyclic AMP may be stimulated by PGE2-release, however, many G-proteins like Gαq and Gβγ may activate GTP-ases like Ras and Rho GTP-ases. The PGE2-mediated cAMP increase leads to enhancement of connexin-43 expression through CREBP-activation111, 139, 145, 146, 147. Calcium spikes in osteoblasts can be obtained from mechano-sensitive ion channels, but also from IP3-stimulated opening of calcisomes, leading to increased COX2 activity and c-fos activation148. MAPK is involved through stimulation of the cascade ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, BMK-1, and JNK. Following the up-regulation of MAPKs activities is a down-regulation of RANK-L secretion and an increase in the expression of eNOS. As a result, eNOS-induced NO-synthesis ensues, which eventually leads to reduced RANK-L expression through activation of the guanylate cyclase, yielding the cells low in RANK-L/OPG-ratio111, 119, 126, 149.
In terms of cell engineering, one may ask the following questions: which type and application schedule of mechanical forces are producing the better osteoblasts and chondrocytes for cell replacements? Which are the major mechano-transducing molecules in these cells? And which of the signalling pathways are more prone to the detrimental effect of senescence and disease?
The Wnt- and Notch-pathway of signalling
The Wnt-pathway along with the Notch-pathway of signalling2, 20, 41, 150, 151, 152, may serve as switch types of regulators in bone, as well as cartilage remodelling, since they are involved in the stabilization of recruitment of SCs to the different cellular species, as well as the acquisition of precise phenotypic features. The increase of ROS with age antagonizes the skeletal effects of Wnt/β-catenin by diverting β-catenin from TCF- to FoxO-mediated transcription. Activation of FoxO-mediated transcription by ROS via JNK is deemed to lead to the processes of senescence. The adapter protein p66shc is activated by increased intracellular ROS and also generates ROS in the mitochondria. The Wnt/β-catenin signalling cascade is, on the other hand, related to bone remodelling and/or modelling. Activation of the LRP5/6-fz receptor complex by Wnts leads to inactivation of GSK-3β, which prevents the proteosomal degradation of β-catenin and, thereby promotes its accumulation in the cytoplasm. Upon its translocation into the nucleus, β-catenin associates with the TCF/LEF family of transcription factors and regulates the expression of Wnt target genes. With increasing age, increased ROS production diverts the limited pool of β-catenin from TCF/LEF to Foxo-mediated transcription, thus tilting the balance. This shift of the balance may be responsible for the conversion of the beneficial effects of Wnt/β-catenin on bone (ie enhanced osteoblastogenesis, and reduced apoptosis of osteoblasts, as well as diminished osteoclastogenesis). FoxO-mediated signalling increases transcription of the superoxide dismutase gene, as well as the genes for catalase and Gadd45, while β-catenin/TCF/LEF enhance the levels of Axin2, OPG, and ALP, of which Axin (along with APC) ensures binding to β-catenin/TCF/LEF. Thereby, the Wnts will ensure transcription of genes leading to bone accrual, also overcoming the problem of diminished osteoblast differentiation and maintenance of bone tissue due to the onset of senescence39, 151 .
The Notch-signalling mechanism leads to suppressed osteoblast differentiation. Direct interaction of Notch with its ligands, Delta or Jagged, leads to the cleavage, release, and nuclear translocation of its intracellular domain (NICD). In the nucleus, NICD forms a complex with CSL proteins and masterminds the regulation of gene transcription. This complex or the product of the NICD target gene, Hey1, binds to Runx-2 to inhibit osteoblastogenesis. NICD also inhibits Wnt signalling mediated by β-catenin and, either directly or through its interactions with FoxO1, has the potential to inhibit NFATc1 signalling. The down-regulation of NFATc1 eventually leads to the inhibition of osteoblastogenesis. In addition, the abundance of RANK-L is decreased by Notch signalling, whereas that of OPG is increased, which leads to impaired osteoclastogenesis. Hence, the Notch pathway interferes with the Wnt-pathway by inhibiting its effect on osteoblastogenesis. However, the direction of the overall switch mechanism (between the anabolic and catabolic stages) depends on the levels of FoxO1, Runx2, APC/axin, β-catenin, as well as other factors151, 152.
The Wnt/β-catenin pathway in osteocytes (as well as osteoblasts and to a certain extent chondrocytes) responds to mechanical loading39, 111. Mechanical load applied to bone is perceived mostly by the osteocyte through an unknown mechanism, although induced fluid flow through the lacunar-canalicular system may be a critical component. Perception of load (strain) triggers a number of intracellular responses including the release of PGE2 through a poorly understood mechanism into the lacunar-canalicular fluid, where it can act in an autocrine and/or paracrine fashion. In this, connexin-43 hemi-channels (Cx43HC), PGE2 and integrin proteins appear to be involved. Binding of PGE2 to its EP2 and/or EP4 receptor, leads to a downstream inhibition of GSK-3β, (likely mediated by Akt) and the intracellular accumulation of free β-catenin, but integrin stimulation can also lead to Akt activation and GSK-3β inhibition39, 41. New evidence suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum may participate in the nuclear translocation of β-catenin, which leads to changes in the expression of a number of key target genes. One of the apparent consequences is the reduction in sclerostin and Dkk1 (Wnt inhibitors), with ensuing increased expression of Wnt. The net result of these changes is to create a permissive environment for the binding of Wnt to Lrp5-Fz and an amplification of the load-related signalling151, 152.
Micro-RNA as phenotype controllers
Scrutinizing the above mentioned mechanisms responsible for pre-commitment of either osteoblasts or chondrocytes and the many factors responsible for the sequential acquisition of phenotypic characteristics, it seems mandatory to look for ways the cells may control the developmental processes and secure minimal or non-existent de-differentiation or trans-differentiation between them. Such a system may be constituted by a species of small RNAs, designated microRNAs153, 154, 155.
MicroRNAs are small RNAs, 21–25 nt in length, encoded in the genome, and exert important regulatory roles156, 157, 158. Most of the microRNAs more or less perfectly match the sequence of mRNAs and result in their degradation. These small RNAs reside within the introns of other genes or, more commonly, they can be located outside genes. They may be found in polycistronic clusters or exist individually159, 160. Hence, some may be regulated in parallel with other genes and some may not. However, most microRNAs are transcribed by polymerase II from flanking promoters and contain caps. Firstly, a pre-miRNA is processed into a stem-loop structure (60−80 nt) by the RNA endonuclease Drosha. These pre-miRNAs are exported into the cytoplasm, where the hair-pin is cleaved by Dicer, releasing a miRNA duplex. The two strands separate and release one 21−25 nt mature microRNA. This microRNA is incorporated into a protein complex (RISC), which interacts with its target mRNA by base-pairing, preferentially in its 3'UTR159, 160. MicroRNAs act through two mechanisms; mRNA cleavage or translational repression of mRNA without cleavage. However, most animal microRNAs suppress gene expression by repressing protein translation (Figure 5A) and/or enhance mRNA degradation161. Presently, more than 1200 microRNAs encoded by the human genome have been published. Furthermore, genomic sequences of putative micro-RNAs have been reported.
Each microRNA species may target hundreds of mRNAs and some targets are combinatorially affected by multiple microRNAs. In this context, it should be noted that the wiring of most microRNA target pairs depends on minimally complementary “seed” matches that are experimentally insufficient to confer overt repression. Hence, it should be expected that focussing on single species of microRNAs in loss-of and/or gain-of experiments may not yield significant findings, while a group or cluster approach may do so157, 158, 162. However, the latter approach is both tedious and costly to perform.
The role of microRNAs in gene regulation may be regarded as feed-forward loops to safeguard the complete repression of certain gene transcripts related to a given cell phenotype153, 154, 155, with reference to the cell cycle (“beyond the point of no return”). In a coherent model, TFs repress transcription of a certain target gene, while also stimulating the expression of microRNA(s) responsible for nullifying the translation of “leaking” mRNAs of the same target gene (coherent FFL). Alternatively, the TFs may enhance the expression of a certain target gene, while also inhibiting the expression of microRNA(s) repressing the same target gene (coherent FFL). This gives the opposite result, ie a continuous exposure of the cellular environment to the gene product in question. A third variant (incoherent FFL) is that a set of TFs augment the transcription of a certain target gene, while simultaneously inhibit the expression of microRNA(s) repressing the same target gene. This arrangement yields an unstable, or a transition state for the expression of the target gene in question. This mental modelling exercise for elucidation of the action of microRNAs may be extended to include co-activators of TFs, associated proteins, and repressors (Figure 5B).
Hence, clusters or small families of microRNAs may appear important to identify and follow through the entire differentiation process to be able to identify the minimal group of microRNAs to ensure proper differentiation from stem cells (SCs) or parent cells157, 158, 163. It is therefore not straightforward to assert that a microRNA species exerts a static role in terms of gene translation control. The impact of microRNAs may be classified in several ways in terms of targets, level of target repression and time-course of their presence in a certain cell phenotype153, 154, 155. One model of microRNA classification action depends on whether their major effect is mediated through one or a few targets or through many targets (tens or hundreds). All known genetic switches concern cases of one or a few important microRNA targets, although it is theoretically possible for one microRNA to have many genetically important targets. In a setting, in which hundreds of targets are simultaneously repressed by a given microRNA, it may be that one of the individual regulatory events is particularly important, but that the system collapses when all the regulatory links are broken. In such a setting, a microRNA might serve as a global enforcer of a cell or organ identity154.
Nevertheless, the microRNA system may represent the controlling “switch” in the transition state between two different cellular phenotypes, eg the transition of MSCs into osteoblasts or chondrocytes. A further consequence of this concept is that, in the transition phase between phenotypes, there is a co-expression between certain microRNAs and their target genes, while before and after, there is an inverse relationship between microRNAs and their target genes.
Some mammalian microRNA species appear to be ubiquitously expressed, but most have been found to exhibit developmentally regulated expression patterns in a variety of normal and cancer cells and tissues159, 164, 165, 166, as delineated in the above described conceptual model systems. Many microRNAs are specifically expressed during embryonic stem cell (ESC) differentiation and embryogenesis, as well as during brain development, neuronal differentiation and differentiation of haematopoietic lineages167, 168, 169, 170, 171, 172, 173, 174, 175, 176. Most of these microRNAs are more or less unique to hESCs, however, some might also be present at a lower amount (cfr the incoherent pathway of regulation). This indicates that most hESC microRNAs are subject to a regulation of the type 1 coherent FFL, indicating that one might look amongst genes that will be switched on during differentiation to incorporate them into such FFLs.
In this review, however, we will only concentrate on microRNAs reported to exist in MSCs and which microRNAs have been shown to exert important functions in osteoblasts/osteocytes and chondrocytes. The following microRNA species have been found to exist in hESCs: miRNAs Let-7a, 15b, 16, 17, 18ab, 19b, 20, 21, 29a, 92, 93, 106a, 127, 130b, 134, 143, 154, 200c, 222, 290, 291, 292, 293, 294, 295, 296, 302abcd, 367, 368, 371, 372, 373, 494168, 169, 170, 171. Many of these microRNAs have been demonstrated to be involved in cancer development159, 165, 166, however, most of them are definitively involved in the regulation of gene-related pathways being important for self-renewal167, 177, 178, 179, 180. Among the genes highly expressed in different hESC lines and tissues, were TFs like Oct3/4, FoxD3, Sox2, and a DNA methyl-transferase DNMT3B. In addition, genes involved in the Wnt/β-catenin signalling pathway, such as Frizzled 7, Frizzled 8, and Tcf3 were also highly expressed. Furthermore, also all 4 variants of the FGF family were expressed in hESCs177, 178, 179, 180. Finally, it was also shown that, in six different hESC lines, the genes for Oct3/4, Nanog, GTCM-1, connexin 43/GJA1, TDGF1 and Galanin were highly expressed167, 177, 178, 179, 180. A cross-comparison of the gene lists generated by these efforts shows that Oct3/4, Nanog, Sox2, Rex1, DNMT3B, Lin28, TDGF1, and GDF3 are commonly expressed in all hESCs.
When it comes to haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), a cross-comparison among efforts to demonstrate components evolutionally conserved and developmentally prominent regulated pathways, the following list emerged: Wnt pathway (Lef1, Tcf4, Dsh), the TGFβ super-family (BMP4, Activin C, serine, and threonine kinases NIK and Ski), the Sonic hedgehog (Shh) pathway (Smoothened, SMO), the Notch family (Notch 1 and Manic Fringe), members of the homeobox regulatory cascade (Hoxa9, Meis-1, TGIF, and Enx-1) and Bmi-1167, 177, 178, 179, 180.
Using different search engines available (MirnaViewer, Sanger, PicTar, and others) for some of the human MSCs deemed necessary for self-renewal, it is possible (according to the concept of coherent FFLs) to arrive at some predicted microRNAs responsible for the arrest of the stem cell phenotype, ie the identification of microRNAs putatively important for the onset of differentiation. The following result was achieved for the “disappearance” of the first member of the different gene families, ie Lef1, BMP4, NIK, SMO, Notch1, and Hoxa9 (Table 1).
If one compares the cluster of predicted microRNAs affecting the expression of the above mentioned genes responsible for stem cell renewal with published lists of microRNAs being associated with hESCs, one will notice that Lef1 may be heavily affected by the observed microRNAs 93, the 302-series and the 367–374 series; NIK expression may be blocked by a cluster of microRNAs consisting of 17-5p, 19, 93, 106a, 130b, 301, the 302-series, and the 367–374 series; and Hoxa9 might be down-regulated by microRNAs 19b, 26ab, and 301. Interestingly, one paper recently published in silico and in vivo studies corroborating these speculations181.
This yields 3 out of 6 genes, which may be affected directly by known microRNAs expressed in hESCs, and thus, these microRNAs may serve the purpose of “priming” the mRNAs for repression until some crucial, other microRNAs come along. These could be up-regulated during differentiation processes and may be found within the group consisting of, amongst others: Lef1 (microRNAs 22, 24, 34a, 145, 149); NIK (microRNAs 20, 211, 214, 326, 331, 345); Hoxa9 (microRNAs 128, 139, 147, 196, 205). Indeed, many of the microRNAs listed immediately above, like microRNAs 17-5p, 22, 24, 34ac, 125ab, 128b, 149, 193, 326, and 337 actually are putative targets of most of the transcription factors which are listed in Figure 3. Hence, many switch microRNAs suppressing osteoblast differentiation may be found amongst these microRNA species.
However, only a few articles published over the past 3 years have dealt with microRNA expression and function in osteoblasts and chondrocytes182, 183, 184, 185, 186. Some interesting findings deserve mentioning. Mir-125b has been shown to down-regulate osteoblastic cell differentiation, by down-regulating cell proliferation, where it targets VDR and possibly also ErbB2 and osterix184, 186. BMP2-induced osteoblast differentiation involves mir-135 and mir-133, which target Smad5, a mediator of the BMP-2 signalling, as well as Runx2. Several other microRNAs are also mentioned (miRNAs 9, 17, 27, 29, 30, 96, 106, 133, 138, 181, 182, 320, and 326)183. Recently, mir-29b has been shown to contribute to the positive regulation of osteoblast differentiation185, targeting inhibitors of osteoblastogenesis, like the transcripts and/or proteins encoded by the HDAC4, TGFβ3, ACVR2A, CTNNBIP1, and DUSP genes. Furthermore, silicate-based synthetic bone up-regulated miRNAs 26a, 30b, and 92, while reduced miRNAs 337, 377, 25, 200b, 129, 373, 133b, and 489, while finally, bone prosthesis material (Anatase®) appear to exert biological effects on bone cells, since miRNAs 1, 34c and 210 exhibit a significant up-regulation, while miRNAs 17-5p, 22, 23, 24, 93, 130, and 377 are diminished187, 188, 189, 190. In chondrocytes from growth plates, 30 microRNAs were preferentially expressed, however, these were scarcely expressed in osteoblastic cells (ie miRNAs 1, 10, 22, 122, 127, 134, 196, 202, 206, 299, 300, 322, 329, 362, 376, 377, 380, 381, 409, 410, 431, 433, 434, 495, 496, and 500)182. Interestingly, some of these microRNAs were virtually absent in osteoblasts (ie miRNAs 196, 202, 380, 434, 496, and 500). It should also be mentioned that miRNA 140 has been demonstrated to target histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) in chondrocytes, apparently allowing an increase of Runx2 functioning during the phase of hypertrophia and endochondral ossification191. Finally, it was reported that mir-199b, a BMP-2 responsive microRNA, regulates chondrogenesis in a time-dependent fashion via direct targeting the Smad1 transcript192.
At the moment, no other microRNAs than mir-125b, mir-133b, and mir-135a distinguish themselves due to experimentally proven effects and target-analysis, as one singular microRNA, to play the role as a switch between osteoblast and chondrocyte commitment and/or phenotype acquisition and stability. When searching through lists of genes important for early phase chondrogenesis derived from the literature10 and/or the GenoStem array193, miRNAs 125b, 133b and 135a appear (to a major extent) to leave such genes unperturbed. Mir-125b is expressed in very large quantities in chondrocytes194, so is also the case for mir-135b, while mir-133a seems to much less abundant. Hence, these microRNA species may either introduce a collapse of the system maintaining all the important cellular functions constituting the chondrocytic phenotype, or also serve as a switch away from osteoblastic development (ie pre-commitment). Mir-135a targets BMPR1a, BMPR2, Jak2, Msx2, Smad5, and Stat6, while mir-133b targets Runx2, FGFR1, and TCF7183, signifying that they possess powerful abilities to knock down osteoblastogenesis in their own right. Mir-125b, which overtly hampers the expression of genes responsible for perpetuating the cell cycle184, 186, may be more ubiquitous in its nature, and thus affect many more cell types than osteoblasts and chondrocytes.
However, according to the newly proposed concept of transcription factor (TF) and microRNA interactions156, where TF-TF and microRNA-microRNA regulatory loops are favoured over TF-microRNA loops, one may speculate whether or not clusters of microRNAs targeting a certain set of TF transcripts may play a more important role than regulatory loops consisting of only two elements. Hence, we performed a literature search for TFs important for osteoblastogenesis (Figure 2C) and an in silico analysis for putative microRNAs targeting two or more of 14 transcriptional modulators selected (APC2, Runx2, RNF11, TAZ, Osterix, SP3, Satb2, VDR, ATF4, Dlx5, ETS1, NFATc1, HES1, and LEF1). From a list of putative microRNAs, we selected six (miRNAs 16, 24, 125b, 149, 328, and 339) for further analysis. It appeared that these microRNAs were virtually non-existent in differentiating osteoblasts, while abundantly expressed both in MSCs and differentiating chondrocytes182. Their putative targets were also confirmed using double luciferase-containing psiCHECK2 vector constructs with different 3'UTR sequences 194. Interestingly, the 14 transcriptional modulators seem to be part of a cluster of genes (located by the search engine Ingenuity) inter-connected to TNFα and to p38 MAPK (Figure 6A). When searching for inter-connections between the transcriptional modulators and other proteins (using the PINA search engine), 25 gene products emerge, of which 23 are transcriptional modulators, one is a protein kinase C type (PRKCA), and one is a histone acetyl transferase (EP300) (Figure 6B). Hence, it is quite clear that the transcriptional modulators chosen as targets for osteoblastogenesis are heavily involved in complex transcriptional processes. Targeting the chosen microRNA species with specific antago-miRNAs did block the TGFβ3- and BMP-2 induced differentiation of MSCs towards chondrocytes. The subject microRNA species act synergistically and apparently serve as “switches” between the osteoblastic and the chondrocytic phenotypes194. This is in line with the concept that one microRNA species may reduce the “activity” of a given mRNA by at most 50%, and that more microRNA species, acting synergistically, may reduce the EC50 from some 200−250 pmol/L for one microRNA acting alone, down to almost zero, when more than 6−7 work together195. Interestingly, these microRNAs (miRNAs 16, 24, 125b, 149, 328, and 339) appear to be both necessary and sufficient to fully modulate in vitro dexamethasone-induced osteoblastogenesis, but only partly for TGFβ-induced chondrogenesis using human MSCs194 during a differentiation period of 21 days.
Finally, it should be mentioned that cells are able to shed micro-vesicles (exosomes) containing many types of signalling molecules, as well as microRNA species, which may be taken up into adjacent cells of different phenotypes196, 197. This phenomenon adds to the complexity of microRNA and TF interactions in tissues containing multiple cell types. For example, activated immune cells (ie Th-1>Th-2=Th-17 cells) appear to express very high levels of mir-24, mir-34a, and mir-296, which putatively target the transcriptional modulators APC2, ETS1, LEF1, Satb2, VDR, and Sox9. The subject microRNA species may thus serve as a “switch” tilt the chondrocyte and/or MSC phenotypes towards the osteoblast phenotype, as seen in hypertrophic and senescent articular chondrocytes194, 198. Other microRNAs (like mir-16 and mir-125b) known to be highly expressed in chondrocytes also appear much more abundantly in blood from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)194, 199. It is therefore possible to use various microRNA species as diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers196, 197 for both severity and/or drug responsiveness in inflammatory processes leading to destruction of bone and cartilage due to rheumatoid conditions.
Concluding remarks
Many qualities may be deemed necessary for engineered cells to exhibit, some of which are: in vitro functionality, ability to interact with the local environment in vivo, ability to arrange themselves in a real-time 3D-structure, self-correction of phenotype according to their position and exposure of O2, nutrients, hormonal and GF gradients, and phenotype resilience. The latter characteristic is construed as the ability to withstand wide variations in mechano-stimulation, short- and long-term alterations in access to certain nutritional elements, as well as robustness to counteract local inflammatory processes. Probably, the understanding of the links between important signalling and especially TFs and microRNAs involved in regulatory loops evolving throughout the life-span of osteo-chondral cells, will enable the cells to acquire the above mentioned qualities for a successful cell replacement therapy.
In this respect, a successful approach to obtain engineered cells for replacement of bone and cartilage maybe target a set of microRNAs using pre-miRNAs and/or antago-miRNAs and siRNA modulating selected TFs into polycistronic vector constructs to ensure acquisition of proper characteristics of engineered osteoblasts or chondrocytes. One may also exploit the fact that cells may communicate with each other through micro-vesicles (exosomes) containing microRNAs, thus enabling the subject cells to withstand alteration of phenotype, when being confined to a multi-cellular micro-environment (eg in an inflamed joint invaded by immune cells like Th-cells). MicroRNAs from immune cell signatures or osteoblast/chondrocyte signatures may therefore serve as biomarkers to characterize the severity of inflammatory processes in bone and cartilage and/or their responsiveness to drug therapy.
References
Gordeladze JO, Drevon CA, Syversen U, Reseland JE . Leptin stimulates human osteoblastic cell proliferation, de novo collagen synthesis, and mineralization: Impact on differentiation markers, apoptosis, and osteoclastic signaling. J Cell Biochem 2002; 85: 825–36.
Marie PJ . Transcription factors controlling osteoblastogenesis. Arch Biochem Biophys 2008; 473: 98–105.
Lian JB, Javed A, Zaidi SK, Lengner C, Montecino M, van Wijnen AJ, et al. Regulatory controls for osteoblast growth and differentiation: role of Runx/Cbfa/AML factors. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr 2004; 14: 1–41.
Westendorf JJ, Kahler RA, Schroeder TM . Wnt signaling in osteoblasts and bone diseases. Gene 2004; 341: 19–39.
Komori T . Regulation of osteoblast differentiation by transcription factors. J Cell Biochem 2006; 99: 1233–9.
Krishnan V, Bryant HU, Macdougald OA . Regulation of bone mass by Wnt signaling. J Clin Invest 2006; 116: 1202–9.
Ryoo HM, Lee MH, Kim YJ . Critical molecular switches involved in BMP-2-induced osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells. Gene 2006; 366: 51–7.
Chun JS, Oh H, Yang S, Park M . Wnt signaling in cartilage development and degeneration. BMB Rep 2008, 41: 485–94.
Gaissmaier C, Koh JL, Weise K . Growth and differentiation factors for cartilage healing and repair. Injury 2008; 39 Suppl 1: S88–96.
Goldring MB, Tsuchimochi K, Ijiri K . The control of chondrogenesis. J Cell Biochem 2006; 97: 33–44.
Karlsson C, Lindahl A . Chapter 3 notch signaling in chondrogenesis. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 2009; 275: 65–88.
Karsenty G . Transcriptional control of skeletogenesis. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2008; 9: 183–96.
Miljkovic ND, Cooper GM, Marra KG . Chondrogenesis, bone morphogenetic protein-4 and mesenchymal stem cells. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16: 1121–30.
Drosse I, Volkmer E, Capanna R, De Biase P, Mutschler W, Schieker M . Tissue engineering for bone defect healing: an update on a multi-component approach. Injury 2008; 39 Suppl 2: S9–20.
Axelrad TW, Kakar S, Einhorn TA . New technologies for the enhancement of skeletal repair. Injury 2007; 38 Suppl 1: S49–62.
Liu W, Cui L, Cao Y . Bone reconstruction with bone marrow stromal cells. Methods Enzymol 2006; 420: 362–80.
Matsumoto T, Kuroda R, Mifune Y, Kawamoto A, Shoji T, Miwa M, et al. Circulating endothelial/skeletal progenitor cells for bone regeneration and healing. Bone 2008; 43: 434–9.
Cancedda R, Giannoni P, Mastrogiacomo M . A tissue engineering approach to bone repair in large animal models and in clinical practice. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 4240–50.
Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, Pearce SG . Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: a review. Eur Cell Mater 2007; 13: 1–10.
Khosla S, Westendorf JJ, Oursler MJ . Building bone to reverse osteoporosis and repair fractures. J Clin Invest 2008; 118: 421–8.
Lee SH, Shin H . Matrices and scaffolds for delivery of bioactive molecules in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007; 59: 339–59.
El Tamer MK, Reis RL . Progenitor and stem cells for bone and cartilage regeneration. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2009; 3: 327–37.
Getgood A, Brooks R, Fortier L, Rushton N . Articular cartilage tissue engineering: today's research, tomorrow's practice? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91: 565–76.
Rada T, Reis RL, Gomes ME . Adipose tissue-derived stem cells and their application in bone and cartilage tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2009 Jan 28. [Epub ahead of print].
Vinatier C, Mrugala D, Jorgensen C, Guicheux J, Noel D . Cartilage engineering: a crucial combination of cells, biomaterials and biofactors. Trends Biotechnol 2009; 27: 307–14.
Kim IS, Otto F, Zabel B, Mundlos S . Regulation of chondrocyte differentiation by Cbfa1. Mech Dev 1999; 80: 159–70.
Takeda S, Bonnamy JP, Owen MJ, Ducy P, Karsenty G . Continuous expression of Cbfa1 in nonhypertrophic chondrocytes uncovers its ability to induce hypertrophic chondrocyte differentiation and partially rescues Cbfa1-deficient mice. Genes Dev 2001; 15: 467–81.
Colnot C . Cellular and molecular interactions regulating skeletogenesis. J Cell Biochem 2005; 95: 688–97.
Pelttari K, Winter A, Steck E, Goetzke K, Hennig T, Ochs BG, et al. Premature induction of hypertrophy during in vitro chondrogenesis of human mesenchymal stem cells correlates with calcification and vascular invasion after ectopic transplantation in SCID mice. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 54: 3254–66.
Stringer B, Waddington R, Sloan A, Phillips I, Telford G, Hughes D, et al. Bespoke human hypertrophic chondrocytic cell lines provide the osteoinductive signals required for vascularized bone formation. Tissue Eng 2007; 13: 133–45.
Tao J, Sun Y, Wang QG, Liu CW . Induced endothelial cells enhance osteogenesis and vascularization of mesenchymal stem cells. Cells Tissues Organs 2009 May 6. [Epub ahead of print].
Mackie EJ, Ahmed YA, Tatarczuch L, Chen KS, Mirams M . Endochondral ossification: how cartilage is converted into bone in the developing skeleton. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2008; 40: 46–62.
Usui M, Xing L, Drissi H, Zuscik M, O'Keefe R, Chen D, et al. Murine and chicken chondrocytes regulate osteoclastogenesis by producing RANKL in response to BMP2. J Bone Miner Res 2008; 23: 314–25.
Gordeladze JO, Reseland JE, Drevon CA . Pharmacological interference with transcriptional control of osteoblasts: a possible role for leptin and fatty acids in maintaining bone strength and body lean mass. Curr Pharm Des 2001; 7: 275–90.
Reseland JE, Syversen U, Bakke I, Qvigstad G, Eide LG, Hjertner O, et al. Leptin is expressed in and secreted from primary cultures of human osteoblasts and promotes bone mineralization. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 1426–33.
Takeda S, Elefteriou F, Levasseur R, Liu X, Zhao L, Parker KL, et al. Leptin regulates bone formation via the sympathetic nervous system. Cell 2002; 111: 305–17.
Guidobono F, Pagani F, Sibilia V, Netti C, Lattuada N, Rapetti D, et al. Different skeletal regional response to continuous brain infusion of leptin in the rat. Peptides 2006; 27: 1426–33.
Pogoda P, Egermann M, Schnell JC, Priemel M, Schilling AF, Alini M, et al. Leptin inhibits bone formation not only in rodents, but also in sheep. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21: 1591–9.
Robling AG, Castillo AB, Turner CH . Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2006; 8: 455–98.
Janmey PA, McCulloch CA . Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2007; 9: 1–34.
Glass DA 2nd, Karsenty G. Molecular bases of the regulation of bone remodeling by the canonical Wnt signaling pathway. Curr Top Dev Biol 2006; 73: 43–84.
Glass DA 2nd, Karsenty G. In vivo analysis of Wnt signaling in bone. Endocrinology 2007; 148: 2630–4.
Bonewald LF, Johnson ML . Osteocytes, mechanosensing and Wnt signaling. Bone 2008; 42: 606–15.
Lian JB, Stein GS . Runx2/Cbfa1: a multifunctional regulator of bone formation. Curr Pharm Des 2003; 9: 2677–85.
Xiao G, Jiang D, Thomas P, Benson MD, Guan K, Karsenty G, et al. MAPK pathways activate and phosphorylate the osteoblast-specific transcription factor, Cbfa1. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 4453–9.
Pratap J, Galindo M, Zaidi SK, Vradii D, Bhat BM, Robinson JA, et al. Cell growth regulatory role of Runx2 during proliferative expansion of preosteoblasts. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 5357–62.
Fujita T, Azuma Y, Fukuyama R, Hattori Y, Yoshida C, Koida M, et al. Runx2 induces osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation and enhances their migration by coupling with PI3K-Akt signaling. J Cell Biol 2004; 166: 85–95.
Liu W, Toyosawa S, Furuichi T, Kanatani N, Yoshida C, Liu Y, et al. Overexpression of Cbfa1 in osteoblasts inhibits osteoblast maturation and causes osteopenia with multiple fractures. J Cell Biol 2001; 155: 157–66.
Maruyama Z, Yoshida CA, Furuichi T, Amizuka N, Ito M, Fukuyama R, et al. Runx2 determines bone maturity and turnover rate in postnatal bone development and is involved in bone loss in estrogen deficiency. Dev Dyn 2007; 236: 1876–90.
Dobreva G, Chahrour M, Dautzenberg M, Chirivella L, Kanzler B, Farinas I, et al. SATB2 is a multifunctional determinant of craniofacial patterning and osteoblast differentiation. Cell 2006; 125: 971–86.
Schmidt K, Schinke T, Haberland M, Priemel M, Schilling AF, Mueldner C, et al. The high mobility group transcription factor Sox8 is a negative regulator of osteoblast differentiation. J Cell Biol 2005; 168: 899–910.
Hinoi E, Fujimori S, Wang L, Hojo H, Uno K, Yoneda Y . Nrf2 negatively regulates osteoblast differentiation via interfering with Runx2-dependent transcriptional activation. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 18015–24.
Zhou G, Zheng Q, Engin F, Munivez E, Chen Y, Sebald E, et al. Dominance of SOX9 function over RUNX2 during skeletogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103: 19004–9.
Kim YJ, Kim BG, Lee SJ, Lee HK, Lee SH, Ryoo HM, et al. The suppressive effect of myeloid Elf-1-like factor (MEF) in osteogenic differentiation. J Cell Physiol 2007; 211: 253–60.
Hong JH, Hwang ES, McManus MT, Amsterdam A, Tian Y, Kalmukova R, et al. TAZ, a transcriptional modulator of mesenchymal stem cell differentiation. Science 2005; 309: 1074–8.
Westendorf JJ . Transcriptional co-repressors of Runx2. J Cell Biochem 2006; 98: 54–64.
Hassan MQ, Tare R, Lee SH, Mandeville M, Weiner B, Montecino M, et al. HOXA10 controls osteoblastogenesis by directly activating bone regulatory and phenotypic genes. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27: 3337–52.
Luan Y, Yu XP, Xu K, Ding B, Yu J, Huang Y, et al. The retinoblastoma protein is an essential mediator of osteogenesis that links the p204 protein to the Cbfa1 transcription factor thereby increasing its activity. J Biol Chem 2007; 282: 16860–70.
Jones DC, Wein MN, Oukka M, Hofstaetter JG, Glimcher MJ, Glimcher LH . Regulation of adult bone mass by the zinc finger adapter protein Schnurri-3. Science 2006; 312: 1223–7.
Celil AB, Hollinger JO, Campbell PG . Osx transcriptional regulation is mediated by additional pathways to BMP2/Smad signaling. J Cell Biochem 2005; 95: 518–28.
Koga T, Matsui Y, Asagiri M, Kodama T, de Crombrugghe B, Nakashima K, et al. NFAT and Osterix cooperatively regulate bone formation. Nat Med 2005; 11: 880–5.
Winslow MM, Pan M, Starbuck M, Gallo EM, Deng L, Karsenty G, et al. Calcineurin/NFAT signaling in osteoblasts regulates bone mass. Dev Cell 2006; 10: 771–82.
Day TF, Guo X, Garrett-Beal L, Yang Y . Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in mesenchymal progenitors controls osteoblast and chondrocyte differentiation during vertebrate skeletogenesis. Dev Cell 2005; 8: 739–50.
Gaur T, Lengner CJ, Hovhannisyan H, Bhat RA, Bodine PV, Komm BS, et al. Canonical WNT signaling promotes osteogenesis by directly stimulating Runx2 gene expression. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 33132–40.
Yang X, Karsenty G . ATF4, the osteoblast accumulation of which is determined post-translationally, can induce osteoblast-specific gene expression in non-osteoblastic cells. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 47109–14.
Xiao G, Jiang D, Ge C, Zhao Z, Lai Y, Boules H, et al. Cooperative interactions between activating transcription factor 4 and Runx2/Cbfa1 stimulate osteoblast-specific osteocalcin gene expression. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 30689–96.
Ammann P, Bonjour JP, Rizzoli R . Essential amino acid supplements increase muscle weight, bone mass and bone strength in adult osteoporotic rats. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2000; 1: 43–4.
Ammann P, Laib A, Bonjour JP, Meyer JM, Ruegsegger P, Rizzoli R . Dietary essential amino acid supplements increase bone strength by influencing bone mass and bone microarchitecture in ovariectomized adult rats fed an isocaloric low-protein diet. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 1264–72.
Hassan MQ, Javed A, Morasso MI, Karlin J, Montecino M, van Wijnen AJ, et al. Dlx3 transcriptional regulation of osteoblast differentiation: temporal recruitment of Msx2, Dlx3, and Dlx5 homeodomain proteins to chromatin of the osteocalcin gene. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24: 9248–61.
Lee MH, Kim YJ, Yoon WJ, Kim JI, Kim BG, Hwang YS, et al. Dlx5 specifically regulates Runx2 type II expression by binding to homeodomain-response elements in the Runx2 distal promoter. J Biol Chem 2005; 280: 35579–87.
Levi G, Mantero S, Barbieri O, Cantatore D, Paleari L, Beverdam A, et al. Msx1 and Dlx5 act independently in development of craniofacial skeleton, but converge on the regulation of Bmp signaling in palate formation. Mech Dev 2006; 123: 3–16.
Holleville N, Mateos S, Bontoux M, Bollerot K, Monsoro-Burq AH . Dlx5 drives Runx2 expression and osteogenic differentiation in developing cranial suture mesenchyme. Dev Biol 2007; 304: 860–74.
Bialek P, Kern B, Yang X, Schrock M, Sosic D, Hong N, et al. A twist code determines the onset of osteoblast differentiation. Dev Cell 2004; 6: 423–35.
Guenou H, Kaabeche K, Dufour C, Miraoui H, Marie PJ . Down-regulation of ubiquitin ligase Cbl induced by twist haploinsufficiency in Saethre-Chotzen syndrome results in increased PI3K/Akt signaling and osteoblast proliferation. Am J Pathol 2006; 169: 1303–11.
Lecka-Czernik B, Gubrij I, Moerman EJ, Kajkenova O, Lipschitz DA, Manolagas SC, et al. Inhibition of Osf2/Cbfa1 expression and terminal osteoblast differentiation by PPARgamma2. J Cell Biochem 1999; 74: 357–71.
McCarthy TL, Ji C, Centrella M . Links among growth factors, hormones, and nuclear factors with essential roles in bone formation. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2000; 11: 409–22.
Gutierrez S, Javed A, Tennant DK, van Rees M, Montecino M, Stein GS, et al. CCAAT/enhancer-binding proteins (C/EBP) beta and delta activate osteocalcin gene transcription and synergize with Runx2 at the C/EBP element to regulate bone-specific expression. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 1316–23.
Reseland JE, Gordeladze JO . Role of leptin in bone growth: central player or peripheral supporter? FEBS Lett 2002; 528: 40–2.
Gordeladze JO, Reseland JE . A unified model for the action of leptin on bone turnover. J Cell Biochem 2003; 88: 706–12.
Hao J, Varshney RR, Wang DA . TGF-beta3: A promising growth factor in engineered organogenesis. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2008; 8: 1485–93.
Wescoe KE, Schugar RC, Chu CR, Deasy BM . The role of the biochemical and biophysical environment in chondrogenic stem cell differentiation assays and cartilage tissue engineering. Cell Biochem Biophys 2008; 52: 85–102.
Hall BK, Miyake T . All for one and one for all: condensations and the initiation of skeletal development. Bioessays 2000; 22: 138–47.
Tuan RS . Biology of developmental and regenerative skeletogenesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004: S105–117.
DeLise AM, Fischer L, Tuan RS . Cellular interactions and signaling in cartilage development. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000; 8: 309–34.
Olsen BR, Reginato AM, Wang W . Bone development. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2000; 16: 191–20.
Tickle C . Molecular basis of vertebrate limb patterning. Am J Med Genet 2002; 112: 250–5.
Tickle C . Patterning systems-from one end of the limb to the other. Dev Cell 2003; 4: 449–58.
Niswander L . Pattern formation: old models out on a limb. Nat Rev Genet 2003; 4: 133–43.
Tickle C, Munsterberg A . Vertebrate limb development — the early stages in chick and mouse. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2001; 11: 476–81.
Barna M, Pandolfi PP, Niswander L . Gli3 and Plzf cooperate in proximal limb patterning at early stages of limb development. Nature 2005; 436: 277–81.
Kmita M, Tarchini B, Zakany J, Logan M, Tabin CJ, Duboule D . Early developmental arrest of mammalian limbs lacking HoxA/HoxD gene function. Nature 2005; 435: 1113–6.
Djouad F, Delorme B, Maurice M, Bony C, Apparailly F, Louis-Plence P, et al. Microenvironmental changes during differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells towards chondrocytes. Arthritis Res Ther 2007; 9: R33.
Niswander L . Interplay between the molecular signals that control vertebrate limb development. Int J Dev Biol 2002; 46: 877–81.
Pizette S, Niswander L . BMPs are required at two steps of limb chondrogenesis: formation of prechondrogenic condensations and their differentiation into chondrocytes. Dev Biol 2000; 219: 237–49.
Lefebvre V, Behringer RR, de Crombrugghe B . L-Sox5, Sox6 and Sox9 control essential steps of the chondrocyte differentiation pathway. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001; 9 Suppl A: S69–75.
Lefebvre V, Li P, de Crombrugghe B . A new long form of Sox5 (L-Sox5), Sox6 and Sox9 are coexpressed in chondrogenesis and cooperatively activate the type II collagen gene. Embo J 1998; 17: 5718–33.
Yoon BS, Ovchinnikov DA, Yoshii I, Mishina Y, Behringer RR, Lyons KM . Bmpr1a and Bmpr1b have overlapping functions and are essential for chondrogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 5062–7.
Komori T, Yagi H, Nomura S, Yamaguchi A, Sasaki K, Deguchi K, et al. Targeted disruption of Cbfa1 results in a complete lack of bone formation owing to maturational arrest of osteoblasts. Cell 1997; 89: 755–64.
Derynck R, Zhang YE . Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways in TGF-beta family signalling. Nature 2003; 425: 577–84.
Wan M, Cao X . BMP signaling in skeletal development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005; 328: 651–7.
Minina E, Kreschel C, Naski MC, Ornitz DM, Vortkamp A . Interaction of FGF, Ihh/Pthlh, and BMP signaling integrates chondrocyte proliferation and hypertrophic differentiation. Dev Cell 2002; 3: 439–49.
Beier F . Cell-cycle control and the cartilage growth plate. J Cell Physiol 2005; 202: 1–8.
Sahni M, Ambrosetti DC, Mansukhani A, Gertner R, Levy D, Basilico C . FGF signaling inhibits chondrocyte proliferation and regulates bone development through the STAT-1 pathway. Genes Dev 1999; 13: 1361–6.
McMahon AP, Ingham PW, Tabin CJ . Developmental roles and clinical significance of hedgehog signaling. Curr Top Dev Biol 2003; 53: 1–114.
Tyurina OV, Guner B, Popova E, Feng J, Schier AF, Kohtz JD, et al. Zebrafish Gli3 functions as both an activator and a repressor in Hedgehog signaling. Dev Biol 2005; 277: 537–56.
Ortega N, Behonick DJ, Werb Z . Matrix remodeling during endochondral ossification. Trends Cell Biol 2004; 14: 86–93.
Vu TH, Shipley JM, Bergers G, Berger JE, Helms JA, Hanahan D, et al. MMP-9/gelatinase B is a key regulator of growth plate angiogenesis and apoptosis of hypertrophic chondrocytes. Cell 1998; 93: 411–22.
Hernandez CJ, Keaveny TM . A biomechanical perspective on bone quality. Bone 2006, 39: 1173–81.
Martin RB . The importance of mechanical loading in bone biology and medicine. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2007; 7: 48–53.
Skerry TM . The response of bone to mechanical loading and disuse: fundamental principles and influences on osteoblast/osteocyte homeostasis. Arch Biochem Biophys 2008; 473: 117–23.
Rubin J, Rubin C, Jacobs CR . Molecular pathways mediating mechanical signaling in bone. Gene 2006; 367: 1–16.
Rubin CT, Lanyon LE . Dynamic strain similarity in vertebrates; an alternative to allometric limb bone scaling. J Theor Biol 1984; 107: 321–7.
Weinbaum S, Cowin SC, Zeng Y . A model for the excitation of osteocytes by mechanical loading-induced bone fluid shear stresses. J Biomech 1994; 27: 339–60.
Mizuno S . A novel method for assessing effects of hydrostatic fluid pressure on intracellular calcium: a study with bovine articular chondrocytes. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2005; 288: C329–337.
Boutahar N, Guignandon A, Vico L, Lafage-Proust MH . Mechanical strain on osteoblasts activates autophosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase and proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 tyrosine sites involved in ERK activation. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 30588–99.
Li YJ, Batra NN, You L, Meier SC, Coe IA, Yellowley CE, et al. Oscillatory fluid flow affects human marrow stromal cell proliferation and differentiation. J Orthop Res 2004; 22: 1283–9.
Norvell SM, Alvarez M, Bidwell JP, Pavalko FM . Fluid shear stress induces beta-catenin signaling in osteoblasts. Calcif Tissue Int 2004; 75: 396–404.
Rubin J, Murphy TC, Fan X, Goldschmidt M, Taylor WR . Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase is involved in mechanical strain inhibition of RANKL expression in bone stromal cells. J Bone Miner Res 2002; 17: 1452–60.
Rubin J, Murphy TC, Zhu L, Roy E, Nanes MS, Fan X . Mechanical strain differentially regulates endothelial nitric-oxide synthase and receptor activator of nuclear kappa B ligand expression via ERK1/2 MAPK. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 34018–25.
McAllister TN, Frangos JA . Steady and transient fluid shear stress stimulate NO release in osteoblasts through distinct biochemical pathways. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 930–6.
Zaman G, Pitsillides AA, Rawlinson SC, Suswillo RF, Mosley JR, Cheng MZ, et al. Mechanical strain stimulates nitric oxide production by rapid activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in osteocytes. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1123–31.
Toma CD, Ashkar S, Gray ML, Schaffer JL, Gerstenfeld LC . Signal transduction of mechanical stimuli is dependent on microfilament integrity: identification of osteopontin as a mechanically induced gene in osteoblasts. J Bone Miner Res 1997; 12: 1626–36.
Yang CM, Chien CS, Yao CC, Hsiao LD, Huang YC, Wu CB . Mechanical strain induces collagenase-3 (MMP-13) expression in MC3T3-E1 osteoblastic cells. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 22158–65.
Wiltink A, Nijweide PJ, Scheenen WJ, Ypey DL, Van Duijn B . Cell membrane stretch in osteoclasts triggers a self-reinforcing Ca2+ entry pathway. Pflugers Arch 1995; 429: 663–71.
Rubin J, Fan X, Biskobing DM, Taylor WR, Rubin CT . Osteoclastogenesis is repressed by mechanical strain in an in vitro model. J Orthop Res 1999; 17: 639–45.
Fan X, Roy E, Zhu L, Murphy TC, Ackert-Bicknell C, Hart CM, et al. Nitric oxide regulates receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand and osteoprotegerin expression in bone marrow stromal cells. Endocrinology 2004; 145: 751–9.
Yellowley CE, Li Z, Zhou Z, Jacobs CR, Donahue HJ . Functional gap junctions between osteocytic and osteoblastic cells. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 209–17.
Ryder KD, Duncan RL . Parathyroid hormone enhances fluid shear-induced [Ca2+]i signaling in osteoblastic cells through activation of mechanosensitive and voltage-sensitive Ca2+ channels. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 240–8.
Katsumi A, Orr AW, Tzima E, Schwartz MA . Integrins in mechanotransduction. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 12001–4.
Rawlinson SC, Pitsillides AA, Lanyon LE . Involvement of different ion channels in osteoblasts' and osteocytes' early responses to mechanical strain. Bone 1996; 19: 609–14.
Liu S, Calderwood DA, Ginsberg MH . Integrin cytoplasmic domain-binding proteins. J Cell Sci 2000; 113 (Pt 20): 3563–71.
Ishida T, Peterson TE, Kovach NL, Berk BC . MAP kinase activation by flow in endothelial cells. Role of beta 1 integrins and tyrosine kinases. Circ Res 1996; 79: 310–6.
Weyts FA, Li YS, van Leeuwen J, Weinans H, Chien S . ERK activation and alpha v beta 3 integrin signaling through Shc recruitment in response to mechanical stimulation in human osteoblasts. J Cell Biochem 2002; 87: 85–92.
Kapur S, Baylink DJ, Lau KH . Fluid flow shear stress stimulates human osteoblast proliferation and differentiation through multiple interacting and competing signal transduction pathways. Bone 2003; 32: 241–51.
Schaller MD . The focal adhesion kinase. J Endocrinol 1996; 150: 1–7.
Schlaepfer DD, Hauck CR, Sieg DJ . Signaling through focal adhesion kinase. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1999; 71: 435–78.
Schlaepfer DD, Broome MA, Hunter T . Fibronectin-stimulated signaling from a focal adhesion kinase-c-Src complex: involvement of the Grb2, p130cas, and Nck adaptor proteins. Mol Cell Biol 1997; 17: 1702–13.
Schlaepfer DD, Jones KC, Hunter T . Multiple Grb2-mediated integrin-stimulated signaling pathways to ERK2/mitogen-activated protein kinase: summation of both c-Src- and focal adhesion kinase-initiated tyrosine phosphorylation events. Mol Cell Biol 1998; 18: 2571–85.
Cherian PP, Siller-Jackson AJ, Gu S, Wang X, Bonewald LF, Sprague E, et al. Mechanical strain opens connexin 43 hemichannels in osteocytes: a novel mechanism for the release of prostaglandin. Mol Biol Cell 2005; 16: 3100–6.
Anderson RG . The caveolae membrane system. Annu Rev Biochem 1998; 67: 199–225.
Okamoto T, Schlegel A, Scherer PE, Lisanti MP . Caveolins, a family of scaffolding proteins for organizing “preassembled signaling complexes” at the plasma membrane. J Biol Chem 1998; 273: 5419–22.
Kawamura S, Miyamoto S, Brown JH . Initiation and transduction of stretch-induced RhoA and Rac1 activation through caveolae: cytoskeletal regulation of ERK translocation. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 31111–7.
Zeidan A, Broman J, Hellstrand P, Sward K . Cholesterol dependence of vascular ERK1/2 activation and growth in response to stretch: role of endothelin-1. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003; 23: 1528–34.
Lavandero S, Cartagena G, Guarda E, Corbalan R, Godoy I, Sapag-Hagar M, et al. Changes in cyclic AMP dependent protein kinase and active stiffness in the rat volume overload model of heart hypertrophy. Cardiovasc Res 1993; 27: 1634–8.
Jalali S, Li YS, Sotoudeh M, Yuan S, Li S, Chien S, et al. Shear stress activates p60src-Ras-MAPK signaling pathways in vascular endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1998; 18: 227–34.
Gudi S, Huvar I, White CR, McKnight NL, Dusserre N, Boss GR, et al. Rapid activation of Ras by fluid flow is mediated by Galpha(q) and Gbetagamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins in human endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003; 23: 994–1000.
Li S, Chen BP, Azuma N, Hu YL, Wu SZ, Sumpio BE, et al. Distinct roles for the small GTPases Cdc42 and Rho in endothelial responses to shear stress. J Clin Invest 1999; 103: 1141–50.
Chen NX, Ryder KD, Pavalko FM, Turner CH, Burr DB, Qiu J, et al. Ca2+ regulates fluid shear-induced cytoskeletal reorganization and gene expression in osteoblasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2000; 278: C989–97.
Yan C, Takahashi M, Okuda M, Lee JD, Berk BC . Fluid shear stress stimulates big mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 (BMK1) activity in endothelial cells. Dependence on tyrosine kinases and intracellular calcium. J Biol Chem 1999; 274: 143–50.
Raisz LG . Pathogenesis of osteoporosis: concepts, conflicts, and prospects. J Clin Invest 2005; 115: 3318–25.
Manolagas SC, Almeida M . Gone with the Wnts: beta-catenin, T-cell factor, forkhead box O, and oxidative stress in age-dependent diseases of bone, lipid, and glucose metabolism. Mol Endocrinol 2007; 21: 2605–14.
Canalis E . Notch signaling in osteoblasts. Sci Signal 2008, 1: pe17.
Hornstein E, Shomron N . Canalization of development by microRNAs. Nat Genet 2006; 38 Suppl: S20–24.
Flynt AS, Lai EC . Biological principles of microRNA-mediated regulation: shared themes amid diversity. Nat Rev Genet 2008; 9: 831–42.
Hobert O . Gene regulation by transcription factors and microRNAs. Science 2008; 319: 1785–6.
Zhou Y, Ferguson J, Chang JT, Kluger Y . Inter- and intra-combinatorial regulation by transcription factors and microRNAs. BMC Genomics 2007; 8: 396.
Aguda BD, Kim Y, Piper-Hunter MG, Friedman A, Marsh CB . MicroRNA regulation of a cancer network: consequences of the feedback loops involving miR-17-92, E2F, and Myc. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 19678–83.
Brosh R, Shalgi R, Liran A, Landan G, Korotayev K, Nguyen GH, et al. p53-Repressed miRNAs are involved with E2F in a feed-forward loop promoting proliferation. Mol Syst Biol 2008; 4: 229.
Tong AW, Nemunaitis J . Modulation of miRNA activity in human cancer: a new paradigm for cancer gene therapy? Cancer Gene Ther 2008; 15: 341–55.
Carthew RW, Sontheimer EJ . Origins and mechanisms of miRNAs and siRNAs. Cell 2009; 136: 642–55.
Baek D, Villen J, Shin C, Camargo FD, Gygi SP, Bartel DP . The impact of microRNAs on protein output. Nature 2008; 455: 64–71.
Ozsolak F, Poling LL, Wang Z, Liu H, Liu XS, Roeder RG, et al. Chromatin structure analyses identify miRNA promoters. Genes Dev 2008; 22: 3172–83.
Saumet A, Vetter G, Bouttier M, Portales-Casamar E, Wasserman WW, Maurin T, et al. Transcriptional repression of microRNA genes by PML-RARA increases expression of key cancer proteins in acute promyelocytic leukemia. Blood 2009; 113: 412–21.
Liang Y, Ridzon D, Wong L, Chen C . Characterization of microRNA expression profiles in normal human tissues. BMC Genomics 2007; 8: 166.
Yu J, Wang F, Yang GH, Wang FL, Ma YN, Du ZW, et al. Human microRNA clusters. Genomic organization and expression profile in leukemia cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2006; 349: 59–68.
Rosenfeld N, Aharonov R, Meiri E, Rosenwald S, Spector Y, Zepeniuk M, et al. MicroRNAs accurately identify cancer tissue origin. Nat Biotechnol 2008; 26: 462–9.
Masui S, Nakatake Y, Toyooka Y, Shimosato D, Yagi R, Takahashi K, et al. Pluripotency governed by Sox2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 2007; 9: 625–35.
Lakshmipathy U, Hart RP . Concise review: MicroRNA expression in multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. Stem Cells 2008; 26: 356–63.
Lakshmipathy U, Love B, Goff LA, Jornsten R, Graichen R, Hart RP, et al. MicroRNA expression pattern of undifferentiated and differentiated human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2007; 16: 1003–16.
Tang F, Hajkova P, Barton SC, Lao K, Surani MA . MicroRNA expression profiling of single whole embryonic stem cells. Nucleic Acids Res 2006; 34: e9.
Suh MR, Lee Y, Kim JY, Kim SK, Moon SH, Lee JY, et al. Human embryonic stem cells express a unique set of microRNAs. Dev Biol 2004; 270: 488–98.
Gangaraju VK, Lin H . MicroRNAs: key regulators of stem cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10: 116–25.
Houbaviy HB, Murray MF, Sharp PA . Embryonic stem cell-specific MicroRNAs. Dev Cell 2003; 5: 351–8.
Do JT, Scholer HR . Regulatory circuits underlying pluripotency and reprogramming. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2009; 30: 296–302.
Miska EA, Alvarez-Saavedra E, Townsend M, Yoshii A, Sestan N, Rakic P, et al. Microarray analysis of microRNA expression in the developing mammalian brain. Genome Biol 2004; 5: R68.
Shi Y, Sun G, Zhao C, Stewart R . Neural stem cell self-renewal. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2008; 65: 43–53.
Rao M . Conserved and divergent paths that regulate self-renewal in mouse and human embryonic stem cells. Dev Biol 2004; 275: 269–86.
Zhan M . Genomic studies to explore self-renewal and differentiation properties of embryonic stem cells. Front Biosci 2008; 13: 276–83.
Yang M, Li Y, Padgett RW . MicroRNAs: Small regulators with a big impact. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2005; 16: 387–93.
Ma L, Sun B, Hood L, Tian Q . Molecular profiling of stem cells. Clin Chim Acta 2007; 378: 24–32.
Kim KS, Kim JS, Lee MR, Jeong HS, Kim J . A study of microRNAs in silico and in vivo: emerging regulators of embryonic stem cells. Febs J 2009; 276: 2140–9.
Kobayashi T, Lu J, Cobb BS, Rodda SJ, McMahon AP, Schipani E, et al. Dicer-dependent pathways regulate chondrocyte proliferation and differentiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105: 1949–54.
Li Z, Hassan MQ, Volinia S, van Wijnen AJ, Stein JL, Croce CM, et al. A microRNA signature for a BMP2-induced osteoblast lineage commitment program. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105: 13906–11.
Mizuno Y, Yagi K, Tokuzawa Y, Kanesaki-Yatsuka Y, Suda T, Katagiri T, et al. miR-125b inhibits osteoblastic differentiation by down-regulation of cell proliferation. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008; 368: 267–72.
Li Z, Hassan MQ, Jafferji M, Garzon R, Croce CM, van Wijnen AJ, et al. Biological functions of miR-29b contribute to positive regulation of osteoblast differentiation. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 15676–84.
Mohri T, Nakajima M, Takagi S, Komagata S, Yokoi T . MicroRNA regulates human vitamin D receptor. Int J Cancer 2009; 125: 1328–33.
Palmieri A, Brunelli G, Guerzoni L, Lo Muzio L, Scarano A, Rubini C, et al. Comparison between titanium and anatase miRNAs regulation. Nanomedicine 2007; 3: 138–43.
Palmieri A, Pezzetti F, Brunelli G, Arlotti M, Lo Muzio L, Scarano A, et al. Anatase nanosurface regulates microRNAs. J Craniofac Surg 2008; 19: 328–33.
Palmieri A, Pezzetti F, Brunelli G, Zollino I, Scapoli L, Martinelli M, et al. Differences in osteoblast miRNA induced by cell binding domain of collagen and silicate-based synthetic bone. J Biomed Sci 2007; 14: 777–82.
Annalisa P, Furio P, Ilaria Z, Anna A, Luca S, Marcella M, et al. Anorganic bovine bone and a silicate-based synthetic bone activate different microRNAs. J Oral Sci 2008; 50: 301–7.
Tuddenham L, Wheeler G, Ntounia-Fousara S, Waters J, Hajihosseini MK, Clark I, et al. The cartilage specific microRNA-140 targets histone deacetylase 4 in mouse cells. FEBS Lett 2006; 580: 4214–7.
Lin EA, Kong L, Bai XH, Luan Y, Liu CJ . miR-199a, a bone morphogenic protein 2-responsive MicroRNA, regulates chondrogenesis via direct targeting to Smad1. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 11326–35.
Jorgensen C . Tissue engineering through mesenchymal stem cells: role of the genostem consortium. Regen Med 2006; 1: 493–6.
Gordeladze J, Djouad F, Richard-Duroux I, Bony C, Yssel H, Nuber U, Courties G, et al. Strategy to identify a microrna signature of chondrocytes as a marker for differentiation from mesenchymal stem cells. Genes & Development 2009; in press.
Ivanovska I, Cleary MA . Combinatorial microRNAs: working together to make a difference. Cell Cycle 2008; 7: 3137–42.
Simpson RJ, Jensen SS, Lim JW . Proteomic profiling of exosomes: current perspectives. Proteomics 2008; 8: 4083–99.
Yuan A, Farber EL, Rapoport AL, Tejada D, Deniskin R, Akhmedov NB, et al. Transfer of microRNAs by embryonic stem cell microvesicles. PLoS ONE 2009; 4: e4722.
Gordeladze JO, Pene J, Ghannam S, Jorgensen C, Yssel H . MicroRNAs are implicated in the acquisition of phenotype characteristics (plasticity) of activated human Th cells. J Immunol 2009; in press.
Duroux-Richard I, Fabre S, Pers YM, Courties G, Presumay J, Khoury M, et al. MicroRNA-125b over-expression in sera predicts rituximab responsiveness in rheumatoid arthritis. PlosOne 2009; in press.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by: EU FP6 integrated project “Genostem Adult mesenchymal stem cells engineering for connective tissue disorders”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gordeladze, J., Djouad, F., Brondello, JM. et al. Concerted stimuli regulating osteo-chondral differentiation from stem cells: phenotype acquisition regulated by microRNAs. Acta Pharmacol Sin 30, 1369–1384 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2009.143
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2009.143
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Mechanical loading of the intervertebral disc: from the macroscopic to the cellular level
European Spine Journal (2014)
-
Pro-Chondrogenic Effect of miR-221 and Slug Depletion in Human MSCs
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports (2014)
-
MicroRNAs miR-26a, miR-26b, and miR-29b accelerate osteogenic differentiation of unrestricted somatic stem cells from human cord blood
BMC Genomics (2013)
-
MicroRNA control of bone formation and homeostasis
Nature Reviews Endocrinology (2012)
-
Time-Dependent Processes in Stem Cell-Based Tissue Engineering of Articular Cartilage
Stem Cell Reviews and Reports (2012)