De Smaele et al. reply

However, caution is needed in drawing inferences from these provocative findings about the role of Gadd45β in the cell. Under the conditions used by Amanullah et al., knockout mutation of any of the NF-κB targets identified so far5,6 — including those of the putative JNK inhibitor XIAP (ref. 7) and of NF-κB/RelA itself8 (our unpublished observations) — would not have affected TNF-α-induced killing. This is because cytokine treatment of fibroblasts was far too short and was performed in the absence of low doses of cycloheximide (about 0.1 μg ml−1; ref. 1) , which is needed to downregulate functionally redundant factors.

Our antisense experiments1 indicate that in certain cells, such as lymphoid cell lines, downregulation of gadd45β leads to exaggerated JNK signalling and apoptosis in response to TNF-α. It is likely that the pro-survival programme that is activated by NF-κB depends on tissue-specific elements5,6, so the relevance of Gadd45β to this protective activity of NF-κB might be more marked in certain cell types. As the analysis of Amanullah et al. is limited to the fibroblastoid lineage, it might not be appropriate to generalize conclusions about the effects of Gadd45β on the JNK pathway and apoptosis to other cell types. We agree with Amanullah et al. that further investigation is needed to define the precise contribution of this factor and of other targets to the anti-apoptotic function of NF-κB.