Even though the deployment of solar radiation for surgery1,2,3 must be restricted to clear-sky periods in sun-belt climates, its appeal lies in its potentially low cost compared with conventional laser fibre-optic treatments4. Here we show that interstitial fibre-optic solar surgery can be used effectively to kill tissue in live animals, with highly concentrated sunlight producing the same rapid, localized and extensive damage that is achieved in laser surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first time that intense incoherent light has been applied successfully in an interstitial medical procedure to kill a sizeable and prescribed extent of organ tissue photothermally.
The key factor in most photothermal fibre-optic surgery is not the coherence or monochromaticity of the light, but attaining sufficiently high power density. Solar radiation is particularly effective because its average optical-penetration depth is of the order of millimetres; also, it does not preclude the realization of ultra-high power densities in concentrators3.
Our prototype solar fibre-optic concentrator decouples the collection and delivery of high-density photon flux. A compact outdoor optical system transports several watts of solar radiation into the operating theatre through a flexible, high-transmissivity optical fibre of numerical aperture 0.66 and up to 20 m in length, at a power density commensurate with that of lasers used for surgery (of the order of several watts per mm2)1,3,5. Ex vivo experiments on chicken breasts and livers indicate that a similar type, rate and extent of tissue transformation can be achieved by solar and laser surgery2,3.
This comparable performance of solar and laser fibre-optic surgery stems from their equivalent optical and biophysical properties. The advantages of solar surgery over radiofrequency ablation, cryoablation and electrocautery are therefore the same as those for laser surgery in comparison with these techniques6. However, an advantage of solar compared with laser surgery, apart from cost, is that it does not carry the risk of eye injury to the operating team because concentrated light is delivered over a large angular range1.
For these pilot clinical trials on live animals, our aim was to necrose (by means of coagulation and ablation) a roughly hemispherical liver lesion of about 1 cm3 volume (which corresponds to the size of an average tumour in rats), within a period of 100 s or so, by delivering 2–3 watts of highly concentrated solar radiation.
A general anaesthetic was administered to two healthy 200-g female rats. The liver was exposed to view by scalpel incision on the animal's underside. Solar radiation — whose power was measured as 2.0–2.5 watts — was injected into the upper region of the liver from the distal tip of an optical fibre of 1.0 mm diameter (Fig. 1a). Each animal was irradiated twice, in two separate sections of its liver, for periods ranging from 40 to 180 s. The diameter of the resulting lesion was measured as about 12 mm immediately after the irradiation procedure.
The rats were revived and continued to function without complication. They were killed 24 and 72 h later, respectively. Their liver pathology was investigated immediately with a specific stain for active NADH-dependent enzymes, which therefore identifies living tissue (Fig. 1b), and with haematoxylin-and-eosin stain, which stains both living and dead cells (Fig. 1c). The NADH-enzymatic stain therefore provides superior delineation of the necrosed region of each liver.
Longitudinal and transverse cuts revealed that necrosis was roughly hemispherical and symmetric. The lesion size after 24 h (about 1 cm3) was almost twice that recorded photographically at surgery, but did not increase after 72 h. These findings are consistent with lesion sizes recorded after liver surgery by laser, which increase progressively and markedly for about 24 h after treatment7.
Our results indicate that the efficacy of interstitial fibre-optic solar surgery — that is, the lesion volume per unit of injected light energy — is up to 5 mm3 per joule, which is comparable to that of laser surgery when used in similar procedures.
References
Feuermann, D. & Gordon, J. M. Opt. Eng. 37, 2760–2767 (1998).
Gordon, J. M., Feuermann, D. & Huleihil, M. Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2653–2655 (2002).
Gordon, J. M., Feuermann, D., Huleihil, M., Mizrahi, S. & Shaco-Levy, R. J. Appl. Phys. 93, 4843–4851 (2003).
Katzir, A. Lasers and Optical Fibers in Medicine (Academic, San Diego, 1993).
Feuermann, D., Gordon, J. M. & Huleihil, M. Solar Energy 72, 459–472 (2002).
De Sanctis, J. T., Goldberg, S. N. & Mueller, P. R. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 21, 273–296 (1998).
Fujitomi, Y. et al. Lasers Surg. Med. 24, 14–23 (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Additional information
brief communications is intended to provide a forum for brief, topical reports of general scientific interest and for technical discussion of recently published material of particular interest to non-specialist readers (communications arising). Priority will be given to contributions that have fewer than 500 words, 10 references and only one figure. Detailed guidelines are available on Nature's website (http://www.nature.com/nature).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gordon, J., Feuermann, D., Huleihil, M. et al. Surgery by sunlight on live animals. Nature 424, 510 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/424510a
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/424510a
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.