Abstract
For cartilage reconstruction, it is still difficult to obtain a sufficient volume of cartilage and to maintain its functional phenotype for a long period. Utilizing tissue stem cells is one approach to overcome such difficulties. We show here the presence of cartilage progenitor cells in the ear perichondrium of adult rabbits by 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine labeling, clonogenicity, and differentiation analyses. Long-term label-retaining cells were demonstrated in the perichondrium. Cells from the perichondrium, that is, perichondrocytes were mechanically isolated using a raspatory and maintained in D-MEM/F-12 medium with 10% FCS. They proliferated more vigorously than chondrocytes from the cartilage. Perichondrocytes could differentiate into adipocytes as well as osteocytes in differentiation induction medium. For cartilage reconstruction in vivo, perichondrocytes were seeded on collagen sponge scaffolds and implanted in nude mice. After 4 weeks, the composites with perichondrocytes generated the same weight of cartilaginous tissue as those with chondrocytes. They produced glycosaminoglycan and type II collagen as shown by RT-PCR and immunohistochemical examination. On the contrary, rabbit bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells used as control could regenerate significantly smaller cartilage than perichondrocytes in the implant study. Based on these findings, we propose that the perichondrium containing tissue progenitor cells is one of the potential candidates for use in reconstructing cartilage and new therapeutic modalities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Main
Although many researchers have attempted to regenerate articular cartilage, it is still difficult to maintain the quality for a long time because of environmental factors such as weight-bearing and friction. Meanwhile, cartilage taken from the nasal septum, the external ear or the rib has been used for supporting framework for microtia or augmentation of soft tissue to treat deformities of the face. However, the amount of cartilage that can be excised from the donor sites is limited. Tissue engineering uses organ-specific cells for seeding a scaffold ex vivo. This is thought to be a reasonable approach for preparing large quantities of tissues starting from a small tissue sample, because the tissue samples are of autologous origin and they can be obtained without causing substantial deformity or dysfunction.
Continuously self-renewing tissues such as skin, colon, and intestine are successively restored by stem cells. Stem cells have thus far been used for tissue engineering of several tissues, for example, mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow for blood vessels,1 bone,2 dentin,3 heart muscle,4 liver,5 and skeletal muscle,6 epidermal stem cells from epidermis for skin,7 pancreatic ductal stem cells from pancreatic tissue for pancreas,8 adipo-stromal cells from fat tissue for bone,9 and limbal epithelial stem cells from cornea for cornea,10 and embryonic stem cells for nervous tissue.11
For cartilage reconstruction, it had been thought that mesenchymal stem cells12, 13 would be a possible cell source, but the rate of yield of chondrocytes and extracellular matrix was not sufficient to support three-dimensional auricular scaffolds.14 Furthermore, cartilage reconstruction with ear cartilage has difficulties for practical use. Therefore, we focused on the perichondrium of the ear as a source of cells for auricular cartilage reconstruction. In addition, aiming at future clinical use, we chose the adult ear as a source of cells.
By 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling, clonogenicity assays, and differentiation studies of the perichondrium-derived cells, the presence of tissue progenitor cells in the adult ear perichondrium was first demonstrated in the present study. The perichondrium was mechanically separated from the ear cartilage, and the cells were obtained from the perichondrium and cartilage. The perichondrocytes, expressing cartilage marker genes, were implanted into a subcutaneous space in nude mice with a collagen sponge. We also performed a head-to-head comparison of perichondrocytes with mesenchymal stem cells from rabbit bone marrow about the potency of cartilage reconstruction in vivo. Based on detailed evaluations of the implants, we demonstrated that cultured perichondrocytes could be used for cartilage reconstruction in vivo.
Materials and methods
Animals and Operations
Animals were maintained from the Institute of Laboratory Animals, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University. The number of animals used in this study was kept to a minimum, and all possible efforts to reduce their suffering were made in compliance with protocols established by the Animal Research Committee of Kyoto University.
BrdU Labeling and Detection
BrdU pulse-chase experiments were performed as described.15 Two 4-week-old rabbits were injected daily subcutaneously with 50 mg/kg/day BrdU (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA) for 5 days. The rabbits were killed after 4 weeks. Tissue sections were immersed in 3% hydrogen peroxide (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd, Osaka, Japan) for 10 min, digested with 0.2% trypsin (Kamiya Biomedical Company, Seattle, WA, USA) for 10 min, and denatured for 30 min with denaturing solution (Kamiya Biomedical Company, Seattle, WA, USA). After blocking in blocking solution (Kamiya Biomedical Company, Seattle, WA, USA) for 10 min, sections were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with anti-BrdU antibody (Kamiya Biomedical Company, Seattle, WA, USA). Color was developed by incubation with streptavidin-HRP conjugate (Kamiya Biomedical Company, Seattle, WA, USA) for 10 min and DAB (Kamiya Biomedical Company, Seattle, WA, USA) for 10 min. Hematoxylin was used for counterstaining.
Cell Culture
The perichondrium and the cartilage were harvested from proximal regions in both ears of two 4-week-old male Japanese white rabbits. The perichondrium and the cartilage were collected separately using a dental raspatory and weighed.
Tissues were washed in phosphate-buffered saline without magnesium and calcium ions, pH 7.4 (PBS (−), Takara Bio Inc., Otsu, Japan) containing 0.10% ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) and finely minced with scissors in 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) in D-MEM/F-12 medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA). Then they were digested with 0.25% collagenase-type I (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA)/D-MEM/F-12 medium with shaking at 37°C for 2 h. After passage through a 100 μm nylon mesh (Cell Strainer, BD Falcon, Bedford, MA, USA), cells were washed twice with D-MEM/F-12 medium with 10% FCS. The cell numbers were counted with a hemocytometer and viability was determined by the trypan blue exclusion test.
Clonogenicity assay
To analyze the clonogenicity of cells from the perichondrium and the cartilage, cells were seeded at a density of 60 cells/plate (10 cm diameter).16 They were cultured in D-MEM/F-12 medium with 10% FCS, 10 000 U/ml of penicillin G sodium, 10 000 μg/ml of streptomycin sulfate, 25 μg/ml amphotericin B (Antibiotic-Antimycotic, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) under an atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37°C. The culture medium was replaced every 7 days. The size and number of colonies were quantified after 4 weeks by staining with Giemsa.
Cell growth in vitro
To study the proliferation rate of perichondrocytes and chondrocytes, cells were seeded at a density of 1200 cells/cm2 in 75 cm2 culture flasks (Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and subsequently passaged in D-MEM/F-12 medium with 10% FCS and antibiotic and antimicotic reagents. The culture medium was replaced every 3 days. Cells were trypsinized with 0.25% (w/v) trypsin for 5 min at subconfluency, and they were counted and seeded at the same density as above (approximately a 1:50 dilution).
Adipogenic and Osteogenic Differentiation
For adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of perichondrocytes and chondrocytes, cells were seeded at a density of 2400 cells/cm2 in a 12-well culture plate with cover glasses or in a six-well culture plate, and cultured in D-MEM/F-12 medium with 10% FCS. The culture medium was replaced every 3 days until confluency.17, 18
For adipogenic differentiation, confluent cells were stimulated for 2 weeks in adipogenic induction medium containing h-insulin, L-glutamine, MCGS, dexamethasone, indomethacin, and 3-isobutyl-methyl-xanthine (hMSC Adipogenic Induction SingleQuots®, Cambrex, Walkersville, MD, USA). Cells in a 12-well plate were fixed with 4% phosphate buffered paraformaldehyde for 10 min, stained with oil red O solution (0.3% w/v) for 10 min at room temperature, rinsed with distilled water, and photographed with a digital camera (DXM 1200, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
For osteogenic differentiation, confluent cells were stimulated for 3 weeks in osteogenic induction medium containing dexamethasone, L-glutamine, ascorbate, MCGS, and β-glycerophosphate (hMSC Osteogenic SingleQuots®, Cambrex, Walkersville, MD, USA). Cells in a 12-well plate were detected about alkaline phosphatase expression using an alkaline phosphatase staining kit (Muto Pure Chemicals, Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Cells in a six-well plate were used for RT-PCR.
Isolation and Culture of Mesenchymal Stem Cells from Bone Marrow
MSCs were isolated according to the methods described previously19, 20 with minor modifications. Tibias were dissected from two 4-week-old male Japanese white rabbits. A hole of 2 mm in diameter was created with a drill and bone marrow was aspirated with 5 ml of D-MEM (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) by an 18-gauge needle and syringe. Collected bone marrow tissues were dissociated by triturating with a pipette, and then filtered through a 100 μm nylon mesh. The suspension was centrifuged at 800 rpm for 5 min. The pellet of marrow cells were suspended with 10 ml of D-MEM and cultured in D-MEM with 15% FCS and antibiotic and antimicotic reagents. After 4 days, the nonadherent cells were removed by replacing the medium. Cells were trypsinized with 0.25% (w/v) trypsin for 5 min at subconfluency, and they were seeded at a density of 6000/cm2 and allowed to grow.
Differentiation Studies of MSCs In Vitro
For chondrogenic differentiation, pellet cultures were performed.17 MSCs (2.0 × 105) were spun down at 500 rpm in 15-ml polypropylene centrifuge tubes (Corning Incorporated, Corning, NY, USA), and cultured with chondrogenic induction medium containing dexamethasone, ascorbate, ITS+supplement, penicillin/streptomycin, sodium pyruvate, proline, and L-glutamine (hMSC Chondrogenic SingleQuots®, Cambrex, Walkersville, MD, USA) with 10 ng/ml transforming growth factor-β3 (TGF-β3) (Sigma-Aldrich Inc., Saint Louis, MO, USA). The culture medium was replaced every 3 days, and bottom of each tube was flicked to ensure that the pellets were free-floating after replacing the medium. After 3 weeks of culture, pellets were fixed with 10% phosphate-buffered formalin for 24 h at 4°C. Fixed tissue was embedded in paraffin, sliced into 7.0 μm sections, and stained with toluidine blue (pH 2.5) or Elastica van Gieson. Adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation studies of MSCs were performed as described in perichondrocytes and chondrocytes differentiation studies.
Preparation of Scaffolds and Assembly of the Cell-Scaffold Composites
Collagen sponge was synthesized as previously reported.21 The thickness of the sheet was adjusted to 2 mm, and the average pore size was 90 μm. Collagen sponge was cut into round disks with 12 mm diameter.
For assembly of the MSC-scaffold composites (MSCSCs),22, 23, 24 2.3 × 106 cells were seeded on collagen scaffolds (1.0 × 107 cells/cm3) and they were stimulated in chondrogenic induction medium replaced every day for 2 weeks before implantation. In reconstruction study using the convex perichondrocyte-scaffold composites (PCSCs (conv.)), the concave perichondrocyte-scaffold composites (PCSCs (conc.)), and the chondrocyte-scaffold composites (CSCs), they were made by seeding with 6.0 × 106 cells on collagen scaffolds, and followed by incubation for 24 h. The PCSCs with 2.3 × 106 cells were also made for comparison study with the MSCSCs.
They were then implanted into a subcutaneous pocket, made by blunt dissection on both sides of the midline incision at the dorsum of nude mice. The wound was closed in layers with 5-0 nylon-interrupted sutures.
Histochemical and Immunohistochemical Analyses
The MSCSCs, the PCSCs, and the CSCs were excised for histological analysis 4 weeks after implantation. All specimens were rinsed in PBS (−), and fixed with 10% phosphate-buffered formalin for 24 h at 4°C. Fixed tissue was embedded in paraffin, sliced into 7.0 μm sections, and stained with toluidine blue (pH 2.5) or Elastica van Gieson.
Immunohistochemical staining: Frozen sections were washed three times with PBS (−). After treatment with SaGlyPBS (0.005% saponin, 50 mM glycine in PBS) containing 20% BlockAce (Dainippon, Tokyo, Japan) for 30 min, sections were incubated with anti-hCL (II) antibody (Daiichi Fine Chemicals, Takaoka, Japan) diluted 1:1000 in 5% BlockAce for 30 min at 4°C. This antibody can react with human, rat, and rabbit type II collagen. After washing three times with SaGlyPBS, the sections were incubated for 12 h at 4°C with Alexa Fluor® 546 fragment-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) diluted 1:1000 in SaGlyPBS containing 5% BlockAce. TO-PRO3 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA) was used for nuclear staining by adding it to the secondary antibody solutions. After washing, sections were observed by confocal microscopy (MRC 1024, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
Alizarin Red S (Junsei Chemical Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) staining was used to examine calcification after fixing specimens with 10% phosphate-buffered formalin for 24 h at 4°C and soaking in 3% KOH solution for 1 week.
Isolation of Total RNAs and RT-PCR
Total RNAs were isolated from cultured perichondrocytes, chondrocytes, and dermal fibroblasts using an RNeasy® Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Total RNAs were isolated from the perichondrium and the cartilage excised from 4-week-old rabbits, and from PCSCs and CSCs using Trizol® Reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA) and was purified with an RNeasy® Mini Kit. Using an Advantage RT-for-PCR Kit (BD Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA), cDNA was synthesized with 1.0 μg of total RNAs in 100 μl of solution. Aliquots (one-tenth) of the cDNA products were used for PCR with Taq DNA polymerase (Toyobo Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan) in a PCR System 9700 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Primers for rabbit type I collagen, type II collagen, type X collagen, aggrecan, osteopontin and GAPDH were as follows: type I collagen,25 sense primer (5′-GAGGAATTTCCGTGCCTGGC-3′) and antisense primer (5′-AGCTGTTCCGGGCAATCCTC-3′); type II collagen (GenBank™ accession no. S83370) (323 bp), sense primer (5′-GCACCCATGGACATTGGAGG-3′) and antisense primer (5′-AGCCCCGCACGGTCTTGCTT-3′); type X collagen (GenBank™ accession no. AF247705) (313 bp), sense primer (5′-AGCCAGGGTTGCCAGGACC-3′) and antisense primer (5′-CCAGGAGCACCATATCCTGT-3′); aggrecan (GenBank™ accession no. L38480) (313 bp), sense primer (5′-GAGGAGATGGAGGGTGAGGTCTTT-3′) and antisense primer (5′-CTTCGCCTGTGTAGCAGATG-3′); osteopontin (GenBank™ accession no. D16544) (249 bp), sense primer (5′-GCTCAGCACCTGAATGTACC-3′) and antisense primer (5′-CTTCGGCTCGATGGCTAGC-3′); GAPDH (GenBank™ accession no. L23961) (293 bp), sense primer (5′-TCACCATCTTCCAGGAGCGA-3′) and antisense primer (5′-CACAATGCCGAAGTGGTCGT-3′). PCR condition was 94°C, 30 s; 58°C, 30 s; 72°C, 30 s, followed by 72°C, 5 min. The cycle of PCR reactions was 35 for type I collagen, 30 for type II collagen, type X collagen, and aggrecan, 25 for osteopontin, and 22 for GAPDH. Products of RT-PCR were separated by electrophoresis on agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide and photographed.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test to examine differences between two groups. Values of P<0.01 were considered to be statistically significant. All values are presented as mean±s.e.
Results
Identification of Long-Term Label-Retaining Cells (LRCs)
To identify tissue progenitor cells in the adult ear, we first tried to demonstrate the presence of LRCs, which are known to include stem cells.15 To label the slow-cycling stem cells, BrdU was injected subcutaneously into 4-week-old rabbits for 5 consecutive days. After a 4-week chase period, BrdU was immunohistochemically probed with monoclonal antibody (Figure 1). LRCs were found in the nuclei of the cells at the junction between the cambium and fibrous layer of the perichondrium, but no label remained in the nuclei within the cartilage. Approximate 0.4% of the cells within the cambium layer of the concave perichondrium were positive for BrdU in the rabbits.
Separation of the Perichondrium from the Cartilage
The proximal region of the rabbit ear was examined histologically (Figure 2a and b). The perichondrium consists of two layers, the outer fibrous layer and the inner cambium layer (Figure 2b). After skin, fat, and muscle were removed (Figure 2c), the perichondrium was mechanically separated from the cartilage with a small dental raspatory (Figure 2d and e). The whole perichondrium was used as a source of perichondrocytes.26 The perichondrium and the cartilage were dissected into small pieces and digested with 0.25% collagenase. In a representative experiment using two rabbits, we were able to prepare 3.4 × 104 cells from 0.19 g of the convex perichondrium, 5.0 × 103 cells from 0.21 g of the concave perichondrium, and 1.4 × 105 cells from 0.51 g of the cartilage. It was difficult to prepare a large amount of the perichondrium from the cartilage on the concave side, because the perichondrium is connected to the cartilage with a tightly packed, thicker fibrous layer on this side (Figure 2b).
Clonogenicity Assay
We analyzed the clonogenicity using freshly isolated cells from the perichondrium and the cartilage to assess the proliferation potency of single cells.16 Cells were maintained in monolayer cultures in D-MEM/F-12 medium with 10% FCS. At 4 weeks after seeding 60 cells on a plastic dish, colonies formed by cells from the perichondrium and the cartilage were stained and counted (Figure 3a and b). Cells (35%) from the convex perichondrium and 20% of cells from the concave perichondrium generated colonies with 14–21 mm diameter. In contrast, only 8.5% of cells from the cartilage made colonies with 14–21 mm diameter. A certain population of cells from the convex perichondrium (4.8%) and from the concave perichondrium (1.6%) formed colonies larger than 21 mm in diameter, but cells from the cartilage did not. These findings suggest that cells in the perichondrium proliferate more vigorously than those in the cartilage.
Differentiation of Cells into Adipocytes and Osteocytes
To examine the pluripotency of cells from the perichondrium, differentiation studies were performed. To induce adipogenic differentiation, monolayers of confluent perichondrocytes and chondrocytes were treated with adipogenic induction medium (Figure 3c). A change in shape from polygonal to oval was detected 3 days after stimulation. The stratification of cells advanced and lipid-rich vacuoles within cells increased during the following 11 days. Lipid-rich vacuoles within both type of cells were stained with oil red O (Figure 3c).
To induce osteogenic differentiation, confluent perichondrocytes and chondrocytes were treated with osteogenic induction medium (Figure 3d). Cells formed aggregates or nodules that were strongly positive for alkaline phosphatase 3 weeks after stimulation, but cells under unstimulated conditions were only weakly stained (Figure 3d). Total RNAs were collected from cells 3 weeks after stimulation. RT-PCR was performed for osteopontin, type I collagen and type X collagen (Figure 3d). Type X collagen is specific for hypertrophic chondrocytes and is not expressed in osteogenic regions. With osteogenic differentiation, type I collagen and osteopontin were upregulated, but type X collagen were drastically downregulated. It is concluded that increase of alkaline phosphatase after induction is not a result of hypertrophic chondrocytes differentiation of these cells. These results indicated that cells from the perichondrium and the cartilage had pluripotency to differentiate into adipocytes as well as into osteocytes. Existence of LRCs in the perichondrium, strong clonogenicity, and pluripotency of perichondrocytes suggest that there are tissue progenitor cells in the perichondrium of the rabbit ear.
Characterization of Cultured Perichondrocytes and Chondrocytes
Cells isolated from the perichondrium and the cartilage, that is, perichondrocytes and chondrocytes, respectively, were maintained in D-MEM/F-12 medium with 10% FCS. Under these conditions, the convex and concave perichondrocytes were similar in cell shape, but they were different from chondrocytes with polygonal shape (Figure 4a). The rate of proliferation of perichondrocytes and chondrocytes was analyzed. Perichondrocytes proliferated more rapidly than chondrocytes from the beginning of the primary culture (Figure 4b). The proliferation of chondrocytes gradually became slower and the cells stopped growing after 31 days (five passages). In contrast, perichondrocytes continued to grow at the same rate for more than 8 months (35 passages).
Total RNAs were collected from cells at different passages and RT-PCR was performed (Figure 4c). Cultured perichondrocytes and chondrocytes expressed the type II collagen and aggrecan genes until the third passage. Cultured dermal fibroblasts with a similar cell shape (data not shown) did not express either type II collagen or aggrecan, indicating that the cultured perichondrocytes established by the mechanical separation were different cell populations from dermal fibroblasts. After the fifth passage, only perichondrocytes were used for RT-PCR assays, because chondrocytes stopped growing by the fifth passage. In perichondrocytes, there was type II collagen gene expression until the third passage. Aggrecan gene expression was observed until the tenth passage but was drastically reduced after the fifth passage. At the seventh passage, perichondrocytes expressed a very low level of type X collagen, an early marker of calcification.
These findings showed that cultured perichondrocytes proliferated and had the capacity for production of cartilage-specific molecules even in D-MEM/F-12 medium with 10% FCS. However, type II collagen expression continued until only the third passage, suggesting that perichondrocytes should be used for cartilage reconstruction within the first few passages.
Cartilage Reconstruction with Collagen Sponge In Vivo
To study cartilage reconstruction in vivo, we utilized the collagen sponge scaffold system. For comparison study, we chose rabbit mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from bone marrow. MSCs were isolated from rabbit bone marrow.19, 20 First, pluripotency of these cells was confirmed by adipogenic, osteogenic, and chondrogenic induction study in vitro as described in materials and methods (data not shown). Then, we analyzed potency of cartilage reconstruction of perichondrocytes and MSCs from bone marrow. The MSC-scaffold composites (MSCSCs) seeded with 2.3 × 106 cells at second passage were stimulated in chondrogenic induction medium for 2 weeks in vitro, followed by implantation into a subcutaneous space in the dorsum of nude mice (n=6). The convex perichondrocyte-scaffold composites (PCSCs (conv.)) seeded with 2.3 × 106 cells at second passage were incubated for 24 h before implantation (n=6). 4 weeks after implantation, the MSCSCs were significantly smaller than the PCSCs (conv.) (Figure 5a). The weights of the PCSCs (conv.) and the MSCSCs were 98.5±12.0 and 8.90±2.90 mg, respectively. These results indicated that perichondrocytes are superior to MSCs for cartilage reconstruction in vivo. We examined the potency of cartilage reconstruction using convex perichondrocytes at different passage numbers. The PCSCs (conv.) seeded with 6.0 × 106 cells at the third (n=6), fifth (n=6), and tenth (n=6) passage were implanted into a subcutaneous space in the dorsum of nude mice. At 4 weeks after implantation, the PCSCs (conv.) seeded with the fifth- and tenth-passage cells were significantly smaller than those seeded with third-passage cells (Figure 5b). The weights of the PCSCs (conv.) seeded with the third-, fifth-, and tenth-passage cells were 139±24.1, 46.5±20.2, and 39.1±7.9 mg, respectively (Figure 5b). The PCSCs (conv.) seeded with the third-passage cells showed sulfated glycosaminoglycan deposits around the cells by toluidine blue staining (pH 2.5), but those with the fifth- and the tenth-passage cells did not show such signals (data not shown). Therefore, 6.0 × 106 convex and concave perichondrocytes and chondrocytes at the second passage were seeded on collagen sponge scaffolds. At 4 weeks after implantation, composites of these three groups showed indistinguishable appearance (Figure 5c). The weights of the PCSCs (conv.), the concave perichondrocyte-scaffold composites (PCSCs (conc.)) and the chondrocyte-scaffold composites (CSCs) were not different, 137±15.4, 133±18.3, and 140±42.8 mg, respectively (Figure 5c). Histological and immunohistochemical examinations were performed (Figure 5d). Neither the PCSCs nor the CSCs had distinguishable signals of sulfated glycosaminoglycan around the cells by toluidine blue staining (pH 2.5). Elastica van Gieson staining gave rise to clear signals of collagenous components in all groups. Immunohistochemical staining showed that the level of type II collagen was similar in the PCSCs and the CSCs. Calcification did not occur in either the PCSCs or the CSCs, as shown by the lack of signal with Alizarin Red S staining (Figure 5e).
These results indicated that not only the CSCs but also the PCSCs could produce sulfated glycosaminoglycan and collagenous components and maintain a noncalcificated phenotype in the reconstructed cartilage.
To examine whether the PCSCs implanted in nude mice produce cartilage-specific molecules, RT-PCR was performed using the PCSCs and the CSCs at 4 weeks after implantation. The convex perichondrium and the cartilage were also excised from the rabbit ear and their RNAs were extracted. RT-PCR showed type II collagen and aggrecan gene expression in the PCSCs and the CSCs, which were detected in the tissue of the ear perichondrium and cartilage (Figure 5f). Type X collagen gene expression, which is specific for hypertrophic chondrocytes, was detected only in the CSCs, not in the PCSCs or in the tissue of the ear cartilage. The RT-PCR results suggested that the PCSCs would be more useful for cartilage reconstruction than the CSCs, because the CSCs might induce undesirable hypertrophic chondrocytes. These results showed that the cultured second-passage perichondrocytes had the capacity for cartilage reconstruction in vivo.
Discussion
A major problem of cartilage reconstruction is failure of the maintenance of the implant because of its invariable absorption. The long-term success of a skin graft depends on suitable supplementation of stem cells in the graft. Similarly, for successful cartilage reconstruction, it will likely be necessary to use a sufficient number of self-renewing stem cells.27 Stem cells have the ability to self-renew as well as to generate more-differentiated progeny, and many recent studies have indicated that most adult tissues contain stem cells. These adult stem cells are usually involved in homeostatic processes but are rapidly recruited to repair injured tissues.
In this study, the existence of LRCs was demonstrated in the perichondrium of the adult ear cartilage for the first time. LRCs are subpopulations of cells characterized by having a longer cell cycle than transient amplifying cells. They have been identified in the bulge region of hair follicles as stem cells. Following several cycles of division, the transient amplifying cells withdraw from the cell cycle and execute a terminal differentiation program.28 Adult stem/progenitor cells from various tissues, such as articular cartilage,29 epidermal keratinocytes,16 and mammary glands,30 are capable of proliferating vigorously after stimulation, shown by colony forming capacity. In this study, it is shown that more cells from the perichondrium could form large colonies than cells from the cartilage. Furthermore, perichondrocytes could differentiate into adipocytes and osteocytes in vitro and also into cartilage in vivo. Taken these data together, cartilage progenitor cells have been identified in the perichondrium of the adult ear for the first time.
Mesenchymal stem cells in the perichondrium of the hyaline cartilage of fetal limbs have been shown to be pluripotent.31 However, for practical cartilage reconstruction, it is important to obtain cells from autologous cartilaginous tissues, not from allogenic grafts such as fetal tissues.
It was reported that chondrocytes from the articular cartilage of shoulder joints were implanted in nude mice with poly (L-lactide-ɛ-caprolactone) scaffolds, in which the cartilage was successfully reconstructed and kept its shape for over 10 months.32 The cell population used in that study may have contained cells corresponding to those from the cambium layer of the perichondrium at the auricular cartilage used in the present study, because it seems to be difficult to maintain the regenerated tissue for a long time without stem cells.
In the present study, we showed that the perichondrocytes from the ear perichondrium are useful for regenerating cartilage. Perichondrocytes have been demonstrated to be superior to mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow in this type of application in vivo. The perichondrocytes can be prepared without removing the ear cartilage itself, resulting in preservation of the shape of the donor site. Furthermore, the ear is the easiest site from which to obtain the perichondrium in clinical cases.
Shieh et al14 claimed that cartilage was preferable as donor tissue, because the auricular perichondrium might be influenced by various factors, such as donor age or culture conditions, so the reproducibility of cartilage reconstruction and rate of yield of the new cartilage were inconsistent.
In our study, cultured perichondrocytes suddenly stopped producing type II collagen after only the third passage (Figure 4c), and lost the ability to generate cartilage (Figure 5a). However, van Osch et al33 reported that the young auricular perichondrium produced more sulfated glycosaminoglycan when cultured in serum-free medium in combination with insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and TGF-β2. Therefore, they claimed perichondrium became a useful source of cells for tissue engineering of cartilage.
It is known that cultured chondrocytes, probably containing perichondrocytes, gradually lose the activity to produce cartilage specific molecules after several passages. Redifferentiation of dedifferentiated chondrocytes has been attempted by the addition of various cytokines, such as insulin,34 triiodothyronine,35 bone morphogenetic protein-2,36 IGF-1,37 TGF-β1,38 epidermal growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor-bb, and fibroblast growth factor-2. However, the effects of these cytokines have not been elucidated by in vivo study. Perichondrocytes at the 13th passage were cultured with the combination of 10 ng/ml TGF-β1 and 10 ng/ml IGF-1 or with that of 10 ng/ml TGF-β339 and 10 ng/ml IGF-1. However, only aggrecan mRNA was induced, but type II collagen was not (data not shown). Thus, the optimal combination of cytokines for redifferentiation of dedifferentiated perichondrocytes is now under investigation. In the future, we will need to determine the culture conditions to maintaining the phenotype of perichondrocytes during further passages in order to reconstruct larger cartilage.
As we examined the composites 1 month after implantation in this study, it could not be determined whether perichondrocytes are able to maintain the cartilaginous phenotype for a longer period, for example, for several years in vivo. As this is an indispensable requirement for clinical therapy, we are now preparing human perichondrocytes from a patient with microtia for cartilage reconstruction with at least 1-year incubation in vivo. Although the culture conditions, requirement for growth factors, and kinds of scaffold materials must still be optimized, perichondrocytes from the adult ear showed much promise for cartilage reconstruction.
References
Kocher AA, Schuster MD, Szabolcs MJ, et al. Neovascularization of ischemic myocardium by human bone-marrow-derived angioblasts prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reduces remodeling and improves cardiac function. Nature Med 2001;7:430–436.
Petite H, Viateau V, Bensaïd W, et al. Tissue-engineered bone regeneration. Nature Biotechnol 2000;18:959–963.
Gronthos S, Mankani M, Brahim J, et al. Postnatal human dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97:13625–13630.
Jackson KA, Majka SM, Wang H, et al. Regeneration of ischemic cardiac muscle and vascular endothelium by adult stem cells. J Clin Invest 2001;107:1395–1402.
Lagasse E, Connors H, Al-Dhalimy M, et al. Purified hematopoietic stem cells can differentiate into hepatocytes in vivo. Nature Med 2000;6:1229–1234.
Ferrari G, Angelis GC, Coletta M, et al. Muscle regeneration by bone marrow-derived myogenic progenitors. Science 1998;279:1528–1530.
Ruszczak Z, Schwartz RA . Modern aspects of wound healing: an update. Dermatol Surg 2000;26:219–229.
Ramiya VK, Maraist M, Arfors KE, et al. Reversal of insulin-dependent diabetes using islets generated in vitro from pancreatic stem cells. Nature Med 2000;6:278–282.
Yasuda K, Inoue S, Tabata Y . Influence of culture method on the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human adipo-stromal cells in nonwoven fabrics. Tissue Eng 2004;10:1587–1596.
Tsai RJ, Li L, Chen J . Reconstruction of damaged corneas by transplantation of autologous limbal epithelial cells. N Engl J Med 2000;343:86–93.
Bjorklund A . Cell replacement strategies for neurodegenerative disorders. Novartis Fund Symp 2000;231:7–15.
Berry L, Grant ME, McClure J, et al. Bone-marrow-derived chondrogenesis in vitro. J Cell Sci 1992;101:333–342.
Johnstone B, Yoo JU . Autologous mesenchymal progenitor cells in articular cartilage repair. Clin Orthop 1999;367s:156–162.
Shieh S, Terada S, Vacanti JP . Tissue engineering auricular reconstruction: in vitro and in vivo studies. Biomaterials 2004;25:1545–1557.
Taylor G, Lehrer MS, Jensen PJ, et al. Involvement of follicular stem cells in forming not only the follicle but also the epidermis. Cell 2000;102:451–461.
Morris RJ, Liu Y, Marles L, et al. Capturing and profiling adult hair follicle stem cells. Nature Biotechnol 2004;22:411–417.
Gawronska-Kozak B . Regeneration in the ears of immunodeficient mice: identification and lineage analysis of mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng 2004;10:1251–1265.
Sabatini F, Petecchia L, Tavian M, et al. Human bronchial fibroblasts exhibit a mesenchymal stem cell phenotype and multilineage differentiating potentialities. Lab Invest 2005;85:962–971.
Wakitani S, Goto T, Pineda SJ, et al. Mesenchymal cell-based repair of large, full-thickness defects of articular cartilage. J Bone Joint Surg 1994;76-A:579–592.
Azizi SA, Stokes D, Augelli BJ, et al. Engraftment and migration of human bone marrow stromal cells implanted in the brains of albino rats-similarities to astrocyte grafts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:3908–3913.
Kim BM, Suzuki S, Nishimura Y, et al. Cellular artificial skin substitute produced by short period simultaneous culture of fibroblasts and keratinocytes. Br J Plast Surg 1999;52:573–578.
Pang Y, Cui P, Chen W, et al. Quantitative study of tissue-engineered cartilage with human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2005;7:7–11.
Cho JH, Kim S, Park KD, et al. Chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells using a thermosensitive poly (N-isopropylacrylamide) and water-soluble chitosan copolymer. Biomaterials 2004;25:5743–5751.
Aung T, Miyoshi H, Tun T, et al. Chondroinduction of mouse mesenchymal stem cells in three-dimensional highly porous matrix scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;61:75–82.
Morone MA, Boden SD, Hair G, et al. Gene expression during autograft lumbar spine fusion and the effect of bone morphogenetic protein 2. Clin Orthop 1998;351:252–265.
Ishikawa K, Isshiki N . Experimental study on chondrogenesis by the perichondrium. J Jpn P R S 1988;8:419–434.
Bianco P, Robey PG . Stem cells in tissue engineering. Nature 2001;414:118–121.
Potten CS, Schofield R, Lajtha LG . A comparison of cell replacement in bone marrow, testis and three regions of surface epithelium. Biochim Biophys Acta 1979;560:281–299.
Dowthwaite GP, Bishop JC, Redman SN, et al. The surface of articular cartilage contains a progenitor cell population. J Cell Sci 2004;117:889–897.
Dontu G, Abdallah WM, Foley JM, et al. In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes Dev 2003;17:1253–1270.
Arai F, Ohneda O, Miyamoto T, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells in perichondrium express activated leukocyte cell adhesion molecule and participate in bone marrow formation. J Exp Med 2002;195:1549–1563.
Isogai N, Asamura S, Higashi T, et al. Tissue engineering of an auricular cartilage model utilizing cultured chondrocyte-poly (L-lactide-ɛ-caprolactone) scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2004;10:673–687.
van Osch GJ, van der Veen SW, Burger EH, et al. Chondrogenic potential of in vitro multiplied rabbit perichondrium cells cultured in alginate beads in defined medium. Tissue Eng 2000;6:321–330.
Kato Y, Gospodarowicz D . Growth requirements of low-density rabbit costal chondrocyte cultures maintained in serum-free medium. J Cell Physiol 1984;120:354–363.
Glade MJ, Kanwar YS, Stern PH . Insulin and thyroid hormones stimulate matrix metabolism in primary cultures of articular chondrocytes from young rabbits independently and in combination. Connect Tissue Res 1994;31:37–44.
Martin I, Suetterlin R, Baschong W, et al. Enhanced cartilage tissue engineering by sequential exposure of chondrocytes to FGF-2 during 2D expansion and BMP-2 during 3D cultivation. J Cell Biochem 2001;83:121–128.
van Osch GJ, van der Veen SW, Verwoerd-Verhoef HL . In vitro redifferentiation of culture-expanded rabbit and human auricular chondrocytes for cartilage reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:433–440.
Jacob M, Démarteau O, Schäfer D, et al. Specific growth factors during the expansion and redifferentiation of adult human articular chondrocytes enhance chondrogenesis and cartilaginous tissue formation in vitro. J Cell Biochem 2001;81:368–377.
Lee JW, Kim YH, Kim S, et al. Chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells and its clinical applications. Yonsei Med J 2004;45s:41–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Togo, T., Utani, A., Naitoh, M. et al. Identification of cartilage progenitor cells in the adult ear perichondrium: utilization for cartilage reconstruction. Lab Invest 86, 445–457 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700409
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700409
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Intra-articular delivery of extracellular vesicles secreted by chondrogenic progenitor cells from MRL/MpJ superhealer mice enhances articular cartilage repair in a mouse injury model
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2020)
-
A Novel Approach to Septal Perforation Repair: Septal Cartilage Cells Induce Chondrogenesis of hASCs In Vitro
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2019)
-
Angiogenesis after administration of basic fibroblast growth factor induces proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in elastic perichondrium in an in vivo model: mini review of three sequential republication-abridged reports
Cellular & Molecular Biology Letters (2018)
-
Combining regenerative medicine strategies to provide durable reconstructive options: auricular cartilage tissue engineering
Stem Cell Research & Therapy (2016)
-
Chondrogenic cells respond to partial-thickness defects of articular cartilage in adult rats: an in vivo study
Journal of Molecular Histology (2016)