Abstract
Population viability analysis (PVA) is widely applied in conservation biology to predict extinction risks for threatened species and to compare alternative options for their mangement1,2,3,4. It can also be used as a basis for listing species as endangered under World Conservation Union criteria5. However, there is considerable scepticism regarding the predictive accuracy of PVA, mainly because of a lack of validation in real systems2,6,7,8. Here we conducted a retrospective test of PVA based on 21 long-term ecological studies—the first comprehensive and replicated evaluation of the predictive powers of PVA. Parameters were estimated from the first half of each data set and the second half was used to evaluate the performance of the model. Contrary to recent criticisms, we found that PVA predictions were surprisingly accurate. The risk of population decline closely matched observed outcomes, there was no significant bias, and population size projections did not differ significantly from reality. Furthermore, the predictions of the five PVA software packages were highly concordant. We conclude that PVA is a valid and sufficiently accurate tool for categorizing and managing endangered species.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boyce, M. S. Population viability analysis. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 481–506 (1992).
Beissinger, S. R. & Westphal, M. I. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 62, 821–841 (1998).
Groom, M. J. & Pascual, M. A. in Conservation Biology (eds Fiedler, P. L. & Kareiva, P. M.) 4–27 (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1998).
Norton, T. W. (ed.) Special issue: applications of population viability analysis to biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 73, 91– 176 (1995).
International Union for the Conservation of Nature. IUCN Red List Categories (Gland, Switzerland, 1994).
Caughley, G. Directions in conservation biology. J. Anim. Ecol. 63, 215–244 (1994).
Taylor, B. L. The reliability of using population viability analysis for risk classification of species. Conserv. Biol. 9, 551– 558 (1995).
Ludwig, D. Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction? Ecology 80, 298–310 ( 1999).
Possingham, H. P., Lindenmayer, D. B. & Norton, T. W. A framework for the improvement of threatened species based on population viability analysis (PVA). Pac. Conserv. Biol. 1, 38–45 (1993 ).
Ralls, K. & Taylor, B. L. in The Ecological Basis of Conservation: Heterogeneity, Ecosystems, and Biodiversity (eds Pickett, S. B. A., Ostfeld, R. S., Shachak, M. & Likens, G. E.) 228– 235 (Chapman & Hall, New York, 1997).
Talbot, J. Land and Environment Court of New South Wales: Record of Hearing #10151 of 1994 (Court Report, Sydney, 1994).
Soulé, M. E. & Kohm, K. A. Research Priorities for Conservation Biology (Island, Washington DC, 1989 ).
Brook, B. W., Lim, L., Harden, R. & Frankham, R. Does population viability analysis software predict the behaviour of real populations? A retrospective study on the Lord Howe Island woodhen Tricholimnas sylvestris (Sclater). Biol. Conserv. 82, 119– 128 (1997).
Brook, B. W., Cannon, J. R., Lacy, R. C., Mirande, C. & Frankham, R. A comparison of the population viability analysis packages GAPPS, INMAT, RAMAS and VORTEX for the Whooping crane (Grus americana). Anim. Conserv. 2, 23–31 (1999).
Wigley, T. M. L. Climate change: a successful prediction? Nature 376 , 463–464 (1995).
Ramanathan, R. Introductory Econometrics with Applications 2nd edn (Dryden, Fort Worth, 1995).
Oreskes, N., Shrader-Frenchette, K. & Belitz, K. Verification, validation, and the confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263, 641–646 (1994).
Wahlberg, N., Moilanen, A. & Hanski, I. Predicting the occurrence of endangered species in fragmented landscapes. Science 273, 1536– 1538 (1996).
Huggard, D. J. A linear programming model of herbivore foraging: imprecise, yet successful? Oecologia 100, 470–474 (1994).
Belovsky, G. E. How good must models and data be in ecology? Oecologia 100, 475–480 (1994).
Ginzburg, L. R., Slobodkin, L. B., Johnson, K. & Bindman, A. G. Quasiextinction probabilities as a measure of impact on population growth. Risk Anal. 2, 171–182 (1982).
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. Biometry 4th edn (Freeman, New York, 1995).
Akçakaya, H. R., Burgman, M. A. & Ginzburg, L. R. Applied Population Ecology 2nd edn (Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, 1999).
Grenfell, B. T., Price, O. F., Albon, S. D. & Clutton-Brock, T. H. Overcompensation and population cycles in an ungulate. Nature 355, 823–826 (1992).
Burgman, M. A., Ferson, S. & Akçakaya, H. R. Risk Assessment in Conservation Biology (Chapman & Hall, London, 1993).
Zeckhauser, R. J. & Viscusi, W. K. Risk within reason. Science 248, 559– 564 (1990).
Mills, L. S. et al. Factors leading to different viability predictions for a grizzly bear data set. Conserv. Biol. 10, 863– 873 (1996).
Reynolds, M. R., Burkhart, H. E. & Daniels, R. F. Procedures for statistical validation of stochastic simulation models. Forest Sci. 27, 349– 364 (1981).
Arnqvist, G. & Wooster, D. Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 236–240 (1995).
Acknowledgements
We thank K. Armitage, M. Boyce, J. Cannon, C. Catterall, T. Clutton-Brock, M. Curry, B. Grenfell, R. Harden, J. Kikkawa, M. Lynch, C. Mirande, R. Peterson, C. Schwartz, P. Smith, J. Vucetich and the Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team for supplying data, and S. Andelman, J. Ballou, J. Bull, S. Ferson, I. Hanski, R. Harris, J. Kikkawa, R. Lacy, H. McCallum, M. McCarthy, S. Mills, P. Miller, S. Pimm, H. Regan and M. Soulé for comments on the manuscript. This study was funded by Australian Research Council and Macquarie University grants.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brook, B., O'Grady, J., Chapman, A. et al. Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404, 385–387 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1038/35006050
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/35006050
This article is cited by
-
Population viability analysis and management recommendations for two huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) (Molina, 1782) populations in Chile
Mammalian Biology (2024)
-
Estimation of the present status of the species based on the theoretical bounds of environmental noise intensity: An illustration through a big abundance data and simulation
Theoretical Ecology (2022)
-
Investigating local population dynamics of bottlenose dolphins in the northern Bahamas and the impact of hurricanes on survival
Mammalian Biology (2022)
-
Can we reestablish a self-sustaining population? A case study on reintroduced Crested Ibis with population viability analysis
Avian Research (2021)
-
Slow life history leaves endangered snake vulnerable to illegal collecting
Scientific Reports (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.