Abstract
Thirty patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) were randomly selected to participate in this study which evaluated the inter rater reliability of the original and of the modified Ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity in the lower limbs. A doctor and a physiotherapist rated the muscle tone of hip adductors, hip extensors, hip flexors and ankle plantarflexors according to the original and to the modified Ashworth scale. The results were analyzed using a Cohen's Kappa statistical test and showed varying levels of reliability for different muscle groups and limbs. Kappa values ranged between 0.21 and 0.61 (mean 0.37). The original scale was slightly more reliable than was the modified scale. However, this difference was not significant (P>0.05), and was not consistent between the two limbs and between different muscle groups. It was concluded that the Ashworth scale is of limited use in the assessment of spasticity in the lower limb of patients with SCI. Further work is required to establish a standardised speed of muscle stretching during the test, or to find more appropriate grades and descriptions of spasticity for this patient group. The effects of training of the raters in the use of the scales also warrants further investigation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Lance J W . Pathophysiology of spasticity and clinical experience with baclofen. In: Feldman RG, Young RR and Koella WP (ed). Spasticity: Disordered Motor Control. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago: 1980, pp 185–220.
Katz R T, Rymer W Z . Spastic hypertonia: mechanisms and measurement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989; 70: 144–155.
Pierrot-Deseilligny E . Pathophysiology of spasticity. Triangle 1985; 22: 165–174.
Dimitrijevic M R . Spasticity. In: Swash M and Kennard C (eds). Scientific Basis of Clinical Neurology. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1985.
Rushworth G . Some pathophysiological aspects of spasticity and the search for rational and successful therapy. Int Rehab Med 1980; 2: 23–26.
Lance J W, Burke D . Mechanisms of spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1974; 55: 332–337.
Burke D . Mechanisms underlying the tendon jerk and H-reflex. In: Delwaide PJ and Yound RR (eds). Clinical Neurophysiology in Spasticity. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985: chapter 5.
Kidd G, Lawes N, Musa I . Understanding neuromuscular plasticity. Edward Arnold, London: 1992, p 99.
Pederson E . Clinical aspects of spasticity and measurement of spasticity. In: Thomas C (ed). Spasticity: Mechanisms, Measurement and Management. American Lecture Series: 1969; 752: 36–54.
Jones E W et al. Comments on the design of an instrument to measure spasticity in the arm – SAM. Engineering in Medicine 1982; 11: 47–50.
Bodin P G, Morris M E . Interrater reliability of the modified Ashworth scale for wrist flexor spasticity following stroke. Proceedings Book II, World Federation of Physical Therapy, 11th Congress, London, 1991, pp 505–507.
Leslie G C, Muir C, Part N J, Roberts R C . A comparison of the assessment of spasticity by the Wartenberg pendulum test and the Ashworth grading scale in patients with multiple sclerosis. Clinical Rehabilitation 1992; 6: 41–48.
Haas B M . Measuring spasticity: A survey of current practice among health care professionals. British Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 1994; 1: 90–95.
Katz R T, Rovai G P, Brait C, Rymer Z . Objective quantification of spastic hypertonia: Correlation with clinical findings. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1992; 73: 339–347.
Chan A, Hugos C, Morrison S, Theriot K . Balance and spasticity: What we know and what we believe. J Neuro Rehab 1994; 8: 119–130.
Bajd T, Vodovnik L . Pendulum testing for spasticity. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 1994; 6: 9–16.
Bajd T and Bowman B . Testing and modelling of spasticity. Journal of Biomedical Engineering 1982; 4: 91–96.
Bohannon R W . Variability and reliability of the pendulum test for spasticity using a Cybex II isokinetic dynamometer. Physical Therapy 1987; 67: 659–661.
Firoozbakhsh K K, Kunkel C F, Scemin A M E, Moneim M S . Isokinetic dynamometric technique for spasticity assessment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 72: 379–385.
WHO. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. World Health Organisation, Geneva: 1980, p47.
Wade D T . Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1992, p 17.
Sloan R L et al. Inter-rater reliability of the modified Ashworth scale for spasticity in hemiplegic patients. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 1992; 15: 158–161.
Lee K C, Carson L, Kinnin E, Patterson V . The Ashworth scale: a reliable and reproducible method of measuring spasticity. J Neur Rehab 1989; 3:205–209.
Brar S P et al. Evaluation of treatment protocols on minimal to moderate spasticity in Multiple Sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 186–189.
Ashworth B . Preliminary trial of carisoprodol in Multiple Sclerosis. Practitioner 1964; 192: 540–542.
Bohannon R W, Smith M B . Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy 1987; 67: 206–207.
Cohen J . A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1960; 20: 37–46.
Siegel S, Castellan N J . Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988, pp 285–290.
Fleiss J L . The measurement of inter rater agreement. In. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. John Wiley, New York, 1981, pp 147–150.
Nuyens G et al. Inter-rater reliability of the Ashworth scale in multiple sclerosis. Clinical Rehabilitation 1994; 8: 286–292.
Noth J . Trends in the pharmacophysiology and pharmacotherapy of spasticity. J Neurol 1991; 238: 131–139.
Frankel H L et al. The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries to the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 1969; 7: 179–192.
Haas B M, Crow J L . Towards a clinical measurement of spasticity. Physiotherapy 1995; 81: 474–480.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haas, B., Bergström, E., Jamous, A. et al. The inter rater reliability of the original and of the modified Ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 34, 560–564 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.100
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.100
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
The effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy in acute traumatic spinal cord injury on motor and sensory function within 6 months post-injury: a study protocol for a two-arm three-stage adaptive, prospective, multi-center, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial
Trials (2022)
-
Spasticity distribution and severity in individuals with HTLV-1-associated myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis
Journal of NeuroVirology (2021)
-
Comparison of the efficacy of intramuscular botulinum toxin type-A injection into the pectoralis major and the teres major muscles and suprascapular nerve block for hemiplegic shoulder pain: a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
Neurological Sciences (2020)
-
Use of ultrasound shear wave to measure muscle stiffness in children with cerebral palsy
Journal of Ultrasound (2018)
-
Opposite, bidirectional shifts in excitation and inhibition in specific types of dorsal horn interneurons are associated with spasticity and pain post-SCI
Scientific Reports (2017)