Key Points
-
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy are first-line treatment options for upper urinary tract calculi
-
The role of open stone surgery has essentially been eliminated by noninvasive and minimally invasive alternative treatment options
-
Open stone surgery should only be considered for complex cases, as a salvage treatment option, or when access to modern-day technology is limited
-
Laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques are able to replicate the goals of open surgery with reduced potential morbidity and should be offered for indicated cases
-
Although overall literature regarding laparoscopic approaches is lacking, favourable evidence exists supporting laparoscopic pyelolithotomy and ureterolithotomy for solitary large stones
-
Combining treatment approaches is often the best way to achieve maximal stone clearance and optimal outcomes
Abstract
Treatment options for kidney stones and ureteral stones have evolved considerably over the past several decades, to the point where almost any stone can now be considered for treatment with a noninvasive or a minimally invasive approach including shock wave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. The safety and morbidity associated with these techniques are favourable relative to traditional open surgical approaches to stone removal. However, they also require unique skillsets, access to instrumentation and relatively high maintenance costs, potentially limiting their use on a global scale. Coincident with the emergence of endourology have been considerable improvements in laparoscopic surgical techniques to the point that nearly any open surgery can be performed in a minimally invasive laparoscopic fashion. Such approaches, including those with robotic assistance, have potential application for the treatment of upper urinary tract stones, particularly in complex senarios as well as in areas where access to endourological instruments might be limited.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hippocrates. The genuine works of Hippocrates [Greek] (Wood's Library of Standard Medical Authors, 1879–1886).
Herr, H. W. 'Cutting for the stone': the ancient art of lithotomy. BJU Int. 101, 1214–1216 (2008).
Simforoosh, N. & Aminsharifi, A. Laparoscopic management in stone disease. Curr. Opin. Urol. 23, 169–174 (2013).
Chaussy, C., Brendel, W. & Schmiedt, E. Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet 2, 1265–1268 (1980).
Lingeman, J. E., Matlaga, B. R. & Evan, A. P. in Campbell–Walsh Urology 9th edn Ch. 44 (eds Wein, A. J., Kavoussi. L. R., Novick, A, C., Partin, A. W. & Peters, C. A.) (Saunders, 2007).
Aboumarzouk, O. M. et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus ureteroscopic management for ureteric calculi. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006029.pub3 (2011).
Turney, B. W. et al. Trends in urological stone disease. BJU Int. 109, 1082–1087 (2012).
Bhojani, N. & Lingeman, J. E. Shockwave lithotripsy—new concepts and optimizing treatment parameters. Urol. Clin. North Am. 40, 59–66 (2013).
Scales, C. D. Jr. Practice patterns in the management of urinary lithiasis. Curr. Urol. Rep. 14, 154–157 (2013).
Lyon, E. S., Kyker, J. S. & Schoenberg, H. W. Transurethral ureteroscopy in women: a ready addition to the urological armamentarium. J. Urol. 119, 35–36 (1978).
Hyams, E. S. et al. A Prospective, Multi-Institutional Study of Flexible Ureteroscopy for Proximal Ureteral Stones <2 cm. J. Urol. 193, 165–169 (2014).
Takazawa, R., Kitayama, S. & Tsujii, T. Appropriate kidney stone size for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: When to switch to a percutaneous approach. World J. Nephrol. 4, 111–117 (2015).
Cohen, J., Cohen, S. & Grasso, M. Ureteropyeloscopic treatment of large, complex intrarenal and proximal ureteral calculi. BJU Int. 111, E127–E131 (2013).
Riley, J. M., Stearman, L. & Troxel, S. Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. J. Endourol. 23, 1395–1398 (2009).
Hyams, E. S. et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy and holmium laser lithotripsy for the management of renal stone burdens that measure 2 to 3 cm: a multi-institutional experience. J. Endourol. 24, 1583–1588 (2010).
Tiselius, H. G. et al. Guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur. Urol. 40, 362–371 (2001).
Preminger, G. M. et al. Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J. Urol. 173, 1991–2000 (2005).
Albala, D. M. et al. Lower pole I: a prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis-initial results. J. Urol. 166, 2072–2080 (2001).
Soucy, F. et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for staghorn calculi: a single center's experience over 15 years. J. Endourol. 23, 1669–1673 (2009).
Bayar, G. et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open ureterolithotomy in impacted and very large ureteral stones. Urol. J. 11, 1423–1428 (2014).
Kerbl, K. et al. Current management of urolithiasis: progress or regress? J. Endourol. 16, 281–288 (2002).
Humphreys, M. R. The emerging role of robotics and laparoscopy in stone disease. Urol. Clin. North Am. 40, 115–128 (2013).
Gaur, D. D. et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy. J. Urol. 151, 927–929 (1994).
Nambirajan, T. et al. Role of laparoscopy in management of renal stones: single-center experience and review of literature. J. Endourol. 19, 353–399 (2005).
Hemal, A. K. et al. Evaluation of laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery in urinary stone disease. J. Endourol. 15, 701–705 (2001).
Li, S. et al. Randomized controlled trial comparing retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for the treatment of large renal pelvic calculi: a pilot study. J. Endourol. 28, 946–950 (2014).
Al-Hunayan, A. et al. Management of solitary renal pelvic stone: laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J. Endourol. 25, 975–978 (2011).
Basiri, A. et al. Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with renal pelvic stones: a randomized clinical trial. Urol. J. 11, 1932–1937 (2014).
Wang, X. et al. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy compared to percutaneous nephrolithotomy as surgical management for large renal pelvic calculi: a meta-analysis. J. Urol. 190, 888–893 (2013).
Salvado, J. A. et al. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy: optimizing surgical technique. J. Endourol. 23, 575–578 (2009).
Borges, R. et al. Coagulum pyelolithotomy “revisited” by laparoscopy: technique modification. Urology 79, 1412.e5–1412.e8 (2012).
Nouralizadeh, A. et al. Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy for management of staghorn renal calculi. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 22, 61–65 (2012).
Stein, R. J. et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy: technique and outcomes. J. Endourol. 22, 1251–1255 (2008).
Srivastava, A. et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy—is it an effective mode of treatment? Urol. Int. 80, 306–309 (2008).
Ramakumar, S. et al. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with concomitant pyelolithotomy. J. Urol. 167, 1378–1380 (2002).
Atug, F. et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children. J. Urol. 174, 1440–1442 (2005).
Mufarrij, P. W. et al. Robotic dismembered pyeloplasty: a 6-year, multi-institutional experience. J. Urol. 180, 1391–1396 (2008).
Assimos, D. G. et al. Postoperative anatrophic nephrolithotomy bleeding. J. Urol. 135, 1153–1156 (1986).
Assimos, D. G. Anatrophic nephrolithotomy. Urology 57, 161–165 (2001).
Woodhouse, C. R. et al. The place of extended pyelolithotomy (Gil-Vernet Operation) in the management of renal staghorn calculi. Br. J. Urol. 53, 520–523 (1981).
Kaouk, J. H. et al. Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy: feasibility study in a chronic porcine model. J. Urol. 169, 691–696 (2003).
Deger, S. et al. Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy. Scand. J. Urol. Nephrol. 38, 263–265 (2004).
Zhou, L. et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy for large staghorn calculi. Int. J. Urol. 18, 126–129 (2011).
Simforoosh, N. et al. Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy for management of staghorn renal calculi. J. Laparoendosc. Adv. Surg. Tech. A 23, 306–310 (2013).
Giedelman, C. et al. Laparoscopic anatrophic nephrolithotomy: developments of the technique in the era of minimally invasive surgery. J. Endourol. 26, 444–450 (2012).
Ghani, K. R. et al. Robot-assisted anatrophic nephrolithotomy with renal hypothermia for managing staghorn calculi. J. Endourol. 27, 1393–1398 (2013).
King, S. A. Klaassen, Z. & Madi, R. Robot-assisted anatrophic nephrolithotomy: description of technique and early results. J. Endourol. 28, 325–329 (2014).
Gaur, D. D. et al. Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: technical considerations and long-term follow-up. BJU Int. 89, 339–343 (2002).
Simforoosh, N. et al. Laparoscopic management of ureteral calculi: a report of 123 cases. Urol. J. 4, 138–141 (2007).
Basiri, A. et al. Retrograde, antegrade, and laparoscopic approaches for the management of large, proximal ureteral stones: a randomized clinical trial. J. Endourol. 22, 2677–2680 (2008).
Kumar, A. et al. A prospective randomized comparison between laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones >2 cm: a single-center experience. J. Endourol. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0791 (2014).
Dogra, P. N. et al. Lower ureteral stones revisited: expanding the horizons of robotics. Urology 82, 95–99 (2013).
Raj, G. V. et al. Percutaneous management of calculi within horseshoe kidneys. J. Urol. 170, 48–51 (2003).
Tan, Y. K., Cha, D. Y. & Gupta, M. Management of stones in abnormal situations. Urol. Clin. North Am. 40, 79–97 (2013).
Drach, G. W. et al. Report of the United States cooperative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J. Urol. 135, 1127–1133 (1986).
Sheir, K. Z. et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in anomalous kidneys: 11-year experience with two second-generation lithotripters. Urology 62, 10–16 (2003).
Talic, R. F. Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy monotherapy in renal pelvic ectopia. Urology 48, 857–861 (1996).
Atis, G. et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery in patients with horseshoe kidneys. Urolithiasis 41, 79–83 (2013).
Molimard, B. et al. Flexible ureterorenoscopy with holmium laser in horseshoe kidneys. Urology 76, 1334–1337 (2010).
Weizer, A. Z. et al. Ureteroscopic management of renal calculi in anomalous kidneys. Urology 65, 265–269 (2005).
Miller, N. L. et al. The presence of horseshoe kidney does not affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J. Endourol. 22, 1219–1225 (2008).
Watterson, J. D. et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy of a pelvic kidney: a posterior approach through the greater sciatic foramen. J. Urol. 166, 209–210 (2001).
Matlaga, B. R. et al. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy for ectopic kidneys: over, around, or through. Urology 67, 513–517 (2006).
Zafar, F. S. & Lingeman, J. E. Value of laparoscopy in the management of calculi complicating renal malformations. J. Endourol. 10, 379–383 (1996).
El-Kappany, H. A. et al. Combination of laparoscopy and nephroscopy for treatment of stones in pelvic ectopic kidneys. J. Endourol. 21, 1131–1136 (2007).
Elbahnasy, A. M. et al. Laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in selected patients with ectopic pelvic kidney: a feasible minimally invasive treatment option. J. Endourol. 25, 985–989 (2011).
Bozkurt, I. H., Cirakoglu, A. & Ozer, S. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy in an ectopic pelvic kidney. JSLS 16, 325–328 (2012).
Nayyar, R., Singh, P. & Gupta, N. P. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty with stone removal in an ectopic pelvic kidney. JSLS 14, 130–132 (2010).
Khairy-Salem, H., el-Ghoneimy, M. & el-Atrebi, M. Semirigid ureteroscopy in management of large proximal ureteral calculi: is there still a role in developing countries? Urology 77, 1064–1068 (2011).
Watterson, J. D., Soon, S. & Jana, K. Access related complications during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: urology versus radiology at a single academic institution. J. Urol. 176, 142–145 (2006).
Hohwu, L. et al. A short-term cost-effectiveness study comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J. Med. Econ. 14, 403–409 (2011).
Wright, J. D. et al. Robotically assisted vs laparoscopic hysterectomy among women with benign gynecologic disease. JAMA 309, 689–698 (2013).
Thompson, R. H. et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur. Urol. 58, 340–345 (2010).
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank the National Institutes of Health for its support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors made substantial contributions to discussion of content, wrote the article and reviewed and edited the manuscript before submission. M.S.B. researched data for the article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
J.E.L. has participated in, lectured for and is a consultant and advisor to Lumenis™ and Boston Scientific and has also been involved in a scientific study run by Boston Scientific. He is an owner and medical director of Beck Analytical and an owner of and investor in Midwest Mobile Lithotripsy and Midstate Mobile Lithotripsy. M.S.B. declares no competing interests.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Borofsky, M., Lingeman, J. The role of open and laparoscopic stone surgery in the modern era of endourology. Nat Rev Urol 12, 392–400 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.141
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.141
This article is cited by
-
Combination laparoscopy and nephrolithotomy technique in the same session in patients with complete staghorn stones and poor performance status: case series in a single center with long-term follow-up
World Journal of Urology (2022)
-
Integration and utilization of modern technologies in nephrolithiasis research
Nature Reviews Urology (2016)