Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
This month, we launch a new collection of pieces that highlight ways to improve doctoral education and support graduate student trainees to their fullest potential.
Peer review for a narrative review article can be quite different from the process for an empirical manuscript. We demystify the aims of and procedures for peer review at Nature Reviews Psychology.
Two articles in Nature Reviews Psychology propose a resilience-based approach to mental health outcomes that shifts attention from a binary view of psychopathology to diversity.
All Nature Reviews Psychology articles are edited for clarity and consistency prior to publication. We encourage researchers to devote the same attention to precision when writing their empirical papers.
Two articles in Nature Reviews Psychology shift the focus of research on racial bias from individual-level biases to the systemic, structural and historic forces that shape them.
The editors of Nature Reviews Psychology routinely attend conferences to meet researchers and learn about trends and hot topics in the field. If you see one of us around, we’d love to chat!
The majority of content at Nature Reviews Psychology is invited by the editors. But we are open to (and welcome!) unsolicited proposals. Here are some tips for writing a great pitch.
Two Comments in this issue discuss how international efforts to make psychology more representative of the global population continue to privilege Western perspectives.
As we publish the first issue of Nature Reviews Psychology, we reflect on our ambitions to serve the entirety of psychological science and represent all psychological scientists.
