Articles in 2020

Filter By:

  • The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has disrupted health care worldwide. Patients with cancer seem to be particularly susceptible to morbidities and mortality from this novel disease. No COVID-19-specific therapy currently seems to offer a survival benefit to this unique patient population. Furthermore, the global effects on routine cancer care will likely be felt for decades to come.

    • Leora Horn
    • Marina Garassino
    Comment
  • Despite the introduction of novel therapies, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Randomized controlled trials of low-dose CT-based lung cancer screening in high-risk populations have shown a reduction in mortality. The authors of this Review discuss these studies and present the Screening Planning and Implementation RAtionale for Lung cancer (SPIRAL), a framework to define the scope of future implementation research on lung cancer screening.

    • Matthijs Oudkerk
    • ShiYuan Liu
    • John K. Field
    Review Article
  • Tumour-associated antigens are an attractive therapeutic target in immuno-oncology. Here, the exploratory analyses of T cell responses and preliminary clinical outcomes of the Lipo-MERIT trial of a melanoma vaccine are discussed in the context of prior efforts to harness the immunogenicity of such antigens for antitumour immunity.

    • Anjali Rohatgi
    • John M. Kirkwood
    News & Views
  • Despite several major therapeutic advances, multiple myeloma (MM) remains largely incurable, indicating a need for novel therapies. Thus, considerable research interest exists in chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells targeting BCMA, which is almost universally expressed on MM cells. In this Review, the authors describe the clinical experience with anti-BCMA CAR T cells and discuss several new directions of future research that might prolong the responses of patients receiving these therapies.

    • Lekha Mikkilineni
    • James N. Kochenderfer
    Review Article
  • Technological advances have enabled the analysis of whole genomes, leading to the identification of causal factors that present new opportunities to prevent cancer. The authors of this Review discuss relevant findings in cancer genetics and genomics from the perspective of global cancer prevention and present a conceptual framework for the translation of such findings into clinical practice and evidence-based policies.

    • Ophira Ginsburg
    • Patricia Ashton-Prolla
    • Paul Brennan
    Review Article
  • A role for extracellular vesicles and particles (EVPs) as cancer biomarkers has been elusive. A mass spectrometry-based comparative analysis of EVPs from individuals with or without cancer has now enabled the identification of tumour-associated protein profiles in EVPs in plasma and paired tumour tissues, validating the role of EVPs as a novel liquid biopsy approach in cancer diagnosis.

    • Theresa L. Whiteside
    News & Views
  • Natural killer (NK) cells have an innate potential to kill cancerous cells and considerable effort is being focused on innovative approaches to leverage these cells for cancer therapy. Herein, the authors discuss the variety of NK cell-based therapies that are being developed for the treatment of diverse cancers and identify future avenues for NK cell therapy research.

    • Jacob A. Myers
    • Jeffrey S. Miller
    Review Article
  • Genotyping is recommended for all patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC), both to enable patients to receive targeted therapies and to avoid therapies they are unlikely to benefit from. However, obtaining tumour biopsy material for genotyping is often challenging and is unfeasible in some patients, indicating the need to incorporate liquid biopsy approaches. In this Perspective, the authors provide guidance on how analysis of ctDNA from liquid biopsy samples in patients with metastatic NSCLC prior to first-line therapy has the potential to extend the benefits of genotyping to virtually all patients.

    • Charu Aggarwal
    • Christian D. Rolfo
    • David R. Gandara
    Perspective
  • Tumour budding is hypothesized to reflect the invasive and metastatic capacities of cancers and is accordingly associated with unfavourable patient outcomes. Herein, Lugli and colleagues describe the pathobiological characteristics of this phenomenon, including its associations with epithelial–mesenchymal transition and features of the tumour microenvironment, and review the evidence demonstrating the value of tumour budding as a prognostic biomarker across various solid cancers.

    • Alessandro Lugli
    • Inti Zlobec
    • Iris D. Nagtegaal
    Review Article
  • The number of adults aged ≥65 years with cancer is rapidly growing; these individuals continue to have worse outcomes than younger adults with cancer. The authors of this Review summarize the unique challenges of treating older adults with cancer owing to competing health and ageing-related conditions, and describe the current guidelines as well as investigational studies underway to improve the outcomes of these patients.

    • Sindhuja Kadambi
    • Kah Poh Loh
    • Supriya Mohile
    Review Article
  • Single-arm phase II trials can provide compelling results that facilitate the approval of a new therapy. Designing and interpreting single-arm studies based on four principles — instinct, comparative analysis, statistical soundness and like-for-like comparisons — can provide indications as to which drugs are most likely to provide improved therapeutic options for patients.

    • Robert H. Glassman
    • Grace Kim
    • Marc J. Kahn
    Comment
  • The possible uses of artificial intelligence (AI) in radiation oncology are diverse and wide ranging. Herein, the authors discuss the potential applications of AI at each step of the radiation oncology workflow, which might improve the efficiency and overall quality of radiation therapy for patients with cancer. The authors also describe the associated challenges and provide their perspective on how AI platforms might change the roles of radiation oncology medical professionals.

    • Elizabeth Huynh
    • Ahmed Hosny
    • Raymond H. Mak
    Perspective