Published online 9 December 2009 | Nature | doi:10.1038/news.2009.1133


Fear memories erased without drugs

A temporal twist to a therapeutic technique could block old terrors.

fearFear memories can be erased immediately after recall.iStockphoto

Fearful memories can be wiped out for at least a year using a drug-free technique, according to a study done in the United States.

The technique exploits the way that human brains store and recall memories. When a long-term memory is recalled, it goes through a brief period of vulnerability, after which it must be stored anew to be remembered again. While the memory is in its fragile state, it can be modified or disrupted.

Studies in animals1 have used drugs to interfere with this reconsolidation process, stirring hope for therapies to blunt the haunting memories associated with conditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder. These experiments have helped to understand reconsolidation, but most of the drugs used are toxic to humans — although a study done earlier this year in humans used a drug that can treat high blood pressure, called propranolol2.

Now, psychologist Elizabeth Phelps and her colleagues at New York University have developed a way to interfere with fear memories in humans using a behavioural technique, and the results last for at least a year. The results are published in Nature3.

"We took advantage of a long history of research in animal models that tells us about this process," says Phelps. "Now we can do interventions in humans in a way that's more sophisticated, and possibly take it to the clinic."

Timing is everything

Humans struggling with horrific memories are often treated with a psychotherapeutic technique called extinction therapy, in which the patient is repeatedly exposed to whatever conjures up the memory — such as snakes or a gunshot — and gradually learns that the stimulus is safe. But while getting back on the horse has some success, the old memories are still stored in the brain and often strike again.

“It's going to take a lot more understanding of exactly when, how and where this works to create something clinically useful.”

Elizabeth Phelps
New York University

The authors tweaked the timing of extinction therapy so they could take advantage of the fragile reconsolidation period — a window of malleability that opens about three minutes after the memory is reactivated, but closes a few hours later.

The authors showed people coloured squares and gave them mild electric shocks to the wrist after a certain colour appeared (see video). After training, the coloured squares that had been paired with the shock incited fear in the volunteers, which experimenters measured as changes in skin conductance — an indication of sweat-gland activity.

The next day the authors began the modified extinction training. First they called up the fear memory by showing the coloured square. Ten minutes later, while the memory was in its vulnerable state, they repeatedly showed the coloured square again without shocking the volunteers. A day later the fear response to the coloured square was gone, suggesting that the reconsolidation process had been blocked. The fear showed no sign of returning even a year later.

Meanwhile, people who got the extinction training 6 hours — instead of 10 minutes — after the reminder, or who got no reminder at all, still showed a significant fear response the next day and the next year.

From bench to battlefield?

How well these lab-based findings would translate to the clinic remains unclear, as a mild shock to the wrist is a far cry from the battlefields of Iraq.

Co-author Joseph LeDoux acknowledges that "there is a huge gap between fear in the lab and post-traumatic stress disorder" but that "the stuff we study is relevant because the [brain] circuits are proven to overlap".

Cognitive scientist Lynn Nadel at the University of Arizona in Tucson is cautious for a different reason. "We know that [fear] extinction tends to be context specific," he says. "If you're using extinction on someone with post-traumatic stress disorder from the war, they might feel safe if they have a flashback in the laboratory but not in the real world."


Merel Kindt, the lead author of the study that used propranolol to block fear memories and a psychologist at the University of Amsterdam, was surprised that the authors used skin conductance as the only measure of fear, she says, as it is not specific to fear — it also indicates arousal, for instance.

Phelps agrees that the technique is not ready for prime time. "It's really intriguing, but it's going to take a lot more understanding of exactly when, how and where this works to create something that's really going to be clinically useful," she said. "We just barely understand this." 


If you find something abusive or inappropriate or which does not otherwise comply with our Terms or Community Guidelines, please select the relevant 'Report this comment' link.

Comments on this thread are vetted after posting.

  • #60054

    This paper does not offer any breakthrough at all, it only shows that the effect of the reconsolidation treatment in fear conditioning correlates with changes in the activation of some brain areas (amygdala mainly). I think both things (that learning can be reduced depending on reconsolidation, and that the level of fear correlates with the activation of the amygdala) have been shown in humans before, and this is just a logical connection of the two ideas. We know something more after this experiment, but it is far from a breakthrough, and the paper has many flaws -for example, contrary to what it is stated in the paper changes in activation correlate with levels of learning, but it does not imply that those brain areas encode memories per se, they might for example be involved in the expression of that fear.

Commenting is now closed.