Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Research sharing, ethics and public benefit

Other areas of biomedical research should emulate new standards from the International Society for Stem Cell Research highlighting the importance of sharing materials, data and research rights, and requiring fair global access to resulting diagnostics and therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Daley, G.Q. et al. Science 315, 603–604 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. http://www.isscr.org/guidelines/ (accessed March 2007).

  3. http://ori.dhhs.gov/education/ (accessed November 2006).

  4. Office of Science and Technology Policy. Fed Reg 65, 76260–76264 (2000).

  5. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps_2003/NIHGPS_Part7.htm#_Toc54600131 (accessed March 2007).

  6. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-03–032.html (accessed March 2007).

  7. http://www.nih.gov/news/researchtools/index.htm (accessed March 2007).

  8. Department of Health and Human Services, the National Institutes of Health. Fed. Reg. 64, 72090–72096 (1999).

  9. Duke University v. Madey, 307 F.3d 1331, 64 U.S.P.Q 2d 1737 (Fed. Cir. 2002).

  10. Avorn, J. N. Engl. J. Med. 355, 2169–2171 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Merton, R.K. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blumenthal, D. et al. Acad. Med. 81, 137–145 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jasanoff, S. Designs on Nature (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2005).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Marshall, E. Science 248, 952–957 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Blumenthal, D., Campbell, E.G., Anderson, M.S., Causino, N. & Louis, K.S. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 277, 1224–1228 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Campbell, E.G. et al. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 287, 473–481 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grushcow, J. Univ. Chicago J. Legal Stud. 33, 59–84 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh, J.P., Cho, C. & Cohen, W.M. Science 309, 2002–2003 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vogeli, C. et al. Acad. Med. 81, 128–136 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Committee on Intellectual Property Rights in Genomic and Protein Research and Innovation. National Research Council. Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation and Public Health (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 2006). http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=11487#toc (accessed March 2007).

  21. 45 CFR 46.111(a)(2); 21 CFR 456.111(a)(2).

  22. Taylor, P.L. Sci. Eng. Ethics 11, 589–616 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. http://www.kentlaw.edu/honorsscholars/projects.html (accessed March 2007).

  24. Greenberg et al. v. Miami Children's Hospital Research Institute, 264 F.Supp.2d 1064 (S.D Fla. 2003).

  25. Moore v. Regents of the University of California. 51 Cal. 3d 134 (1990).

  26. National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects. Fed. Reg. 44, 23192–23197 (1979).

  27. Childress, J.F., Meslin, E.M. & Shapiro, H.T. Belmont Revisited: Ethical Principles for Research with Human Subjects (Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Emanuel, E.J., Wendler, D. & Grady, C. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 283, 2701–2711 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Cho, M.K., Illangasekare, S., Weaver, M.A., Leonard, D.G.B. & Merz, J.F. J. Mol. Diagn. 5, 3–8 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zoloth, L. Am. J. Bioeth. 2, 3–11 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuhn, V.T. Am. J. Bioeth. 2, 1–2 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Porter, G., Denning, C., Plomer, A., Sinden, J. & Torremans, P. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 653–655 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Loring, J.F. & Campbell, C. Science 311, 1716–1717 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. http://www.wicell.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=166&Itemid=170www.wicell.org (accessed March 2007).

  35. Taymor, K.S., Scott, C.T. & Greely, H.T. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 411–413 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wadman, M. Nature 435, 272–273 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges the review and comments of Insoo Hyun and George Q. Daley on earlier versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Taylor, P. Research sharing, ethics and public benefit. Nat Biotechnol 25, 398–401 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0407-398

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0407-398

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing