Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
Here's hoping that a proposed shakeup of US regulations will mean that new biotech products avoid AquaAdvantage salmon's two-decade upstream struggle to regulatory approval.
Smear campaigns against those speaking out against scaremongering on genetically modified (GM) crops highlight why support for scientists involved in public outreach is so important.
Maximizing the clinical impact of immune profiling will require dedicated immune monitoring facilities and community standards for handling patient samples.
Even if human research and clinical practice find a way to integrate personal health data, uptake will remain limited unless people are incentivized to participate.
No matter where you look in biopharmaceutical boardrooms, gender bias is evident. Is it so difficult to actually acknowledge this pernicious bias and actively discourage all-male boards?
Nature Biotechnology supports recent calls for public engagement concerning the risks and benefits of genome editing in the human germline, particularly given our poor knowledge of what we should change in the human genome.
European politicians' decision to kick the can of genetically modified (GM) crop approvals down to national governments may accelerate adoption in the short term, but foreshadows legal battles down the road.
Despite recent progress, only a fraction of the drug industry's shelved compounds are shared with the research community. Could online collaborative research offer a solution?