Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain
the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in
Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles
and JavaScript.
The Editors at Communications Psychology, Communications Medicine, Nature Communications, and Scientific Reports invite submissions investigating behavioural change in the context of health.
The question of how individuals may bridge the intention-action gap, from desiring a healthier lifestyle to achieving better health outcomes, is of significant practical concern. Beyond the individual level, we are interested in research that addresses how messaging, structural barriers, and choice architecture can benefit population health or act to its detriment.
This curated Collection will bring together research from a range of disciplines, including psychology, epidemiology, behavioural economics, and public health that addresses the question through field-specific methods, including experimental and observational studies. The aim of the Collection is to span from the individual to societal level to bring together insights of theoretical or practical relevance to create synergies from different approaches.
Each participating journal will apply its standard editorial criteria, including for scope and advance, to the submissions received within the Collection. Authors can choose which journal to submit to based on their own preference. The targeted journal will evaluate the submission for suitability for peer-review at the journal and, where submissions are out of scope but likely suitable for another participating journal, express a recommendation to the authors.
This Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3.
The Covid pandemic has yielded new insights into psychological vaccine acceptance factors. This knowledge serves as a basis for behavioral and communication interventions that can increase vaccination readiness for other diseases.
Understanding collective behaviour is an important aspect of managing the pandemic response. Here the authors show in a large global study that participants that reported identifying more strongly with their nation reported greater engagement in public health behaviours and support for public health policies in the context of the pandemic.
The authors show that accurate information about descriptive norms can increase intentions to accept a vaccine for COVID-19. They show that these effects are largely consistent in the 23 included countries and are concentrated among people who were otherwise uncertain about accepting a vaccine.
Understanding factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine uptake in an evolving pandemic context is important for future vaccine campaigns. Here, the authors investigate the main drivers of vaccine hesitancy in Hong Kong at different stages of the pandemic, where uptake was initially low despite high availability.
Oyake et al. survey patients with neurological and orthopedic disorders undergoing inpatient rehabilitation and the medical practitioners treating them about motivational factors. Whilst there are some differences, the most frequent motivational factors are shared across both patients and medical practitioners.
Koher et al. use Bayesian analysis to evaluate the usefulness of survey responses compared to mobility data as a tool to monitor the effects of lockdown as a disease mitigation strategy. Self-reported contacts during lockdown better predict future hospitalizations than mobility data.