Bacterioplankton and archaeaplankton communities play key roles in the biogeochemical processes of water, and they may be affected by many factors. In this study, we used high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing to profile planktonic bacterial and archaeal community compositions in the upper section of the tidal reach in Yangtze River. We found that the predominant bacterial phyla in this river section were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria, whereas the predominant archaeal classes were Halobacteria, Methanomicrobia, and unclassified Euryarchaeota. Additionally, the bacterial and archaeal community compositions, richnesses, functional profiles, and ordinations were affected by the spatial heterogeneity related to the concentration changes of sulphate or nitrate. Notably, the bacterial community was more sensitive than the archaeal community to changes in the spatial characteristics of this river section. These findings provide important insights into the distributions of bacterial and archaeal communities in natural water habitats.
Microorganisms present in water are key players in biogeochemical processes (e.g., nitrogen, sulphur, and carbon cycling) and are primary producers and consumers in these ecosystems. Furthermore, these microorganisms are major players in processes controlling water quality, particularly processes mediating the fate of pollution released to the water environment1. Although planktonic bacteria and archaea are the two most important groups of microorganisms in water, they have diverse evolutionary histories. Bacteria have long been recognised as having broad distributions throughout all environments around the globe. In contrast, archaea were once thought to inhabit primarily extreme environments, such as psychrophilic2 and hypersaline3 environments, deep-sea hydrothermal vents4, and hot springs5. However, with the emergence and application of modern molecular techniques, researchers have shown that both bacteria and archaea are widely distributed in many diverse environments6. Additionally, nonextremophilic archaea may also be important players in extant global biogeochemical cycles7, similar to bacteria. In addition, owing to the potential differences in the functional division of bacteria and archaea based on their diversities in the same environment8, these organisms may show different responses to a variety of habitats. Analysis of the responses of these organisms is critical for improving our understanding of the mass and energy fluxes of ecosystems.
The tidal reach area of a river is a complex habitat that can be affected by runoff, tide, and seasonal variations. Although the upper section of tidal reach can refer to the area from the tidal current limit to the tidal limit, where the tide had not arrived, the river can also be affected by the tidal wave. In one study, the tidal limit of Yangtze River was found to be located between Anqing (in the dry season) and Nanjing (in the wet season); however, the tidal current limit is located between Zhenjiang and Jiangxinsha (upstream of the Jingjiang location)9. In this area, the water-surface slope and natural flowing velocity are affected by the tidal wave; this influence decreases with the gradual weakening of the tidal wave from the tidal current limit to the tidal limit. Moreover, this effect could also modify the river bed in this river section by changing the natural conditions of sedimentation and erosion. Additionally, after the construction of the Three Gorges Dam (the largest hydropower station in the world) in mid-2006, the conditions of the tidal area have become even more complicated. The natural flowing velocity and natural conditions of sedimentation and erosion may be altered further owing to the combined effects of all factors, leading to distinct microbial communities within this habitat. Studies of changes in these microbial communities will improve our understanding of aquatic microbial ecology.
Many studies describing microbial communities have focused on water environments, such as estuaries10,11,12, rivers13,14, lakes15,16,17, and oceans18,19. Although researchers have also evaluated bacterioplankton communities within these water environments, few studies of planktonic archaeal communities in freshwater habitats have been performed, particularly in fluvial ecosystems20. Some other studies21,22,23,24 have reported variations in bacterioplankton and archaeaplankton communities across freshwater and ocean environments, demonstrating that spatial variability was greater than seasonal patterns of variation. In addition to habitat heterogeneity25, planktonic bacterial and archaeal communities can also respond to changes in many environmental factors in water, such as salinity26,27, dissolved organic matter (DOM)28, alkalinity29, temperature, and soluble reactive phosphorus (SRP)20. Moreover, temporal variation in the microbial community has been shown to be greater than spatial variation in the same habitat15,30,31. In the upper section of the tidal reach in Yangtze River, inherent spatial heterogeneity may exist due to the tidal wave, dynamic changes in the river itself, and artificial engineering, which may result in regular patterns of spatial distributions of bacterial and archaeal communities. However, no studies have yet examined these factors with high-depth coverage or made comparisons of the spatial distributions of archaeal and bacterial communities in this water environment.
Accordingly, in this study, we aimed to explore the bacterial and archaeal community structure compositions in this important water area in the Yangtze River and to investigate the response patterns of these microorganisms to the inherent spatial heterogeneity of the ecosystem. We established sampling sites between the Anqing and Jingjiang cities located in Anhui and Jiangsu provinces of China respectively, stretching across more than 400 km; this region included many economically developed cities, which could have affected the microbial community compositions and distributions. Our findings provide important insights into the distributions of bacterial and archaeal communities in natural water habitats.
Community structure, richness, and diversity of planktonic bacteria and archaea
After pyrosequencing and filtering operations, a total of 908,735 valid reads (465,311 for bacteria and 443,424 for archaea) and 3, 714 operational taxonomic units (OTUs; 987 for bacteria and 2,727 for archaea) were obtained from all water samples. All bacterial OTUs were assigned to 30 different phyla or groups, 76 classes or groups, and 377 genera or groups. The archaeal OTUs were assigned to four different phyla or groups, 23 classes or groups, and 80 genera or groups.
Among the 30 phyla or groups, Proteobacteria (39.95% ± 17.35% [mean ± standard deviation]), Firmicutes (21.54% ± 9.07%), and Actinobacteria (21.17% ± 7.25%) were the three predominant planktonic bacterial phyla identified in the upper section of the tidal reach of Yangtze River (Fig. 1A). The other three phyla, Bacteroidetes (5.01% ± 1.22%), Cyanobacteria (3.45% ± 1.97%), and Acidobacteria (2.93% ± 1.23%) also accounted for a relatively large proportion of the identified organisms. An additional comparison of five sampling sites showed that the bacterial composition of the Jingjiang location was significantly different from the other four locations at the phylum level. The relative mean abundance of Proteobacteria was highest in Jingjiang (p < 0.05), while the relative mean abundances of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes (p < 0.05), and Acidobacteria (p < 0.05) were lowest at this location. Moreover, the abundance of Proteobacteria was negatively correlated with the geographical distances between the sampling sites and mouth of the estuary (p < 0.05).
Although the classes within the phylum Proteobacteria generally play a key role in the biogeochemical cycles of water ecosystems, we focused on the distributions of these groups in this specific river section (Fig. 1B). The results showed that the two most abundant classes were Betaproteobacteria (23.61% ± 19.30%) and Gammaproteobacteria (11.37% ± 3.49%). Additionally, Alphaproteobacteria (3.91% ± 0.82%), Deltaproteobacteria (0.69% ± 0.20%), and Epsilonproteobacteria (0.09% ± 0.13%) were also present in this river section. Comparisons of these classes among the five sampling sites revealed that Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacteria showed significantly higher and lower abundance, respectively, at Jingjiang than at any other site (p < 0.05). These classes were also correlated negatively and positively, respectively, with the geographical distances between the sampling sites and the mouth of the estuary (p = 0.001, R2 = 0.614; p = 0.003, R2 = 0.499).
The four phyla or groups of planktonic archaea in this river section were Euryarchaeota (74.75% ± 4.96%), Thaumarchaeota (21.79% ± 4.33%), unclassified Archaea (2.91% ± 1.17%), and Crenarchaeota (0.55% ± 1.02%). The main communities of planktonic archaea at the class level are listed in Fig. 1A. The three predominant classes or groups were Halobacteria (40.07% ± 8.92%), Methanomicrobia (17.94% ± 9.04%), and unclassified Euryarchaeota (11.17% ± 6.28%). Additionally, the classes of miscellaneous Crenarchaeotic group (7.03% ± 3.47%), marine group I (5.12% ± 2.49%), Thermoplasmata (4.74% ± 1.89%), and unranked Thaumarchaeota (3.48% ± 1.88%) also covered a large proportion of the identified organisms. The relative mean abundance of unclassified Euryarchaeota, marine group I, and unranked Thaumarchaeota was highest at the Jingjiang location. Additionally, the relative mean abundances of marine group I (p = 0.047, R2 = 0.271) and unranked Thaumarchaeota (p = 0.014, R2 = 0.381) were negatively correlated with the distances between the sampling sites and the mouth of the estuary.
The richnesses of bacterial and archaeal communities were estimated by the Chao index, and the diversities of these communities were determining using the Shannon index (Table 1). We found that the Chao index value of the archaeal community at the Jingjiang location was significantly higher than that at other locations (p < 0.05). Additionally, regression analysis showed that the Chao index value of the archaeal community (p = 0.001, R2 = 0.588) was affected by the distances between the sampling sites and the mouth of the estuary. The Chao index value of the bacterial community in this river section was also negatively correlated with the distances between the sampling sites and the mouth of the estuary (p = 0.044, R2 = 0.276) to some extent.
Functional diversities in bacterial and archaeal communities
Bacterial and archaeal functional community profiles were examined, and their corresponding gene abundances are shown in Fig. 2A and B. We found that the gene abundances of all predicted functional groups in the bacterial community were all higher than those in the archaeal community by more than an order of magnitude. Additionally, there were significant differences in relative gene abundance for some main functional classifications between bacterial and archaeal communities; for example, the functions of “translation, ribosomal structure, and biogenesis”, “replication, recombination, and repair”, and “coenzyne transport and metabolism” were obviously increased in the archaeal community (relative abundances: 9.30% ± 1.08%, 6.41% ± 0.39%, and 5.67% ± 0.57%, respectively) compared with those in the bacterial community (relative abundances: 5.27% ± 0.17%, 5.20% ± 0.28%, and 4.04% ± 0.18%, respectively).
These findings demonstrated that the richness of an archaeal community could be affected by the distances between the sampling sites and the mouth of the estuary. Therefore, we next determined whether the functions of the bacterial and archaeal communities could be affected by this distance. Regression analysis results (Table 2) showed that most of the bacterial community function could be affected by the distances between the sampling sites and the mouth of the estuary. In contrast, only the archaeal community function of cytoskeleton (Z) could be affected by this parameter. The abundances of the OTUs corresponding to all functions tended to decrease as the distance from the mouth of the estuary increased.
Ordination of bacterial and archaeal communities and potential influencing factors
A nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) diagram of 15 samples based on Bray-Curtis similarity values of the bacterial community (Fig. 3A) showed that all samples were separated into three groups. Among these groups, most of the samples belonged to three sites in the upper regions of the area, i.e., Anqing, Tongling, and Wuhu, while samples from Nanjing and Jingjiang were distinct and distributed along the x-axis (the first NMDS dimension). The NMDS diagram of samples based on Bray-Curtis similarity values for the archaeal community (Fig. 3C) showed that only the group of samples from Jingjiang was distinct from the other samples, tending to be distributed along the x-axis. Thus, the ordinations of bacterial and archaeal communities were also somewhat related to the distances from the mouth of the estuary (Dongwangsha).
The distances from Dongwangsha were then selected as predictor variables, and the first NMDS dimensions of bacterial and archaeal similarities were set as the outcome variables for linear regression analysis. The results showed that the first dimension of the NMDS analysis of the bacterial community composition plotted against the distances indicated a predictable community response (R2 = 0.593 and p = 0.001; Fig. 3B), suggesting that the bacterial community could be affected by the distance from the mouth of the estuary. At the same time, the first dimension of NMDS analysis of archaeal community composition plotted against the distances also indicated a predictable community response (R2 = 0.454 and p = 0.006; Fig. 3D), suggesting that the archaeal community was also closely influenced by the distances from Dongwangsha. However, most of the communities could not be separated distinctly.
In order to investigate the additional physicochemical factors influencing the bacterial and archaeal communities in the upper section of the tidal reach of Yangtze River, physicochemical parameters, such as salinity, temperature, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, permanganate index, chlorophyll a, ammonia, nitrate, nitrite, cadmium, copper, lead, zinc, mercury, arsenic, oil, turbidity, fluorine, chlorine, sulphate, bromine, total organic carbon (TOC), total carbon (TC), and inorganic carbon (IC), were detected. However, because salinity could not be detected with the SYC1–2 salinity meter, it was excluded, and only the other physicochemical parameters were selected as outcome variables, with the distance from Dongwangsha set as the predictor variable for linear regression analysis (Table 3). The results showed that the distances from Dongwangsha were positively correlated with ammonia but negatively correlated with nitrate, sulphate, cadmium, lead, turbidity, chlorine, and bromine. Furthermore, we then performed regression analysis using these eight physicochemical parameters as the predictor variables and the NMDS1 values of the bacterial and archaeal communities as the outcome variables (Table 3). The results showed that among the eight parameters, nitrate and sulphate could significantly affect the distribution of the bacterial community, whereas only nitrate could significantly affect the distribution of the archaeal community. These parameters all exhibited negative correlations with the first dimensions of NMDS values of bacterial and archaeal communities.
Specific bacterial and archaeal taxa analyses
From the above studies, we found that the factor of distance from Dongwangsha may affect the bacterial and archaeal communities in the upper section of the tidal reach of Yangtze River by altering the concentrations of sulphate and nitrate in the water. Thus, we next aimed to obtain some specific bacterial and archaeal taxa from the various sampling sites and investigate whether these taxa were related to the distance from Dongwangsha and the two parameters identified above. For the archaeal community, only the Jingjiang location was specific for the genus Methanothermobacter. Three specific sampling sites and their specific bacterial taxa are shown in Fig. 4. Analysis of the specific bacterial taxa at Anqing showed that most organisms were related to recycling of sulphur (the family Halothiobacillaceae and subordinate genus Thiovirga; the order Hydrogenophilales, subordinate family Hydrogenophilaceae, and subordinate genus Thiobacillus; the order Desulfovibrionales, subordinate family Desulfomicrobiaceae, and subordinate genus Desulfomicrobium) and nitrogen (the family Gallionellaceae and subordinate genus Candidatus_Nitrotoga). Notably, nearly all taxa in subordinate relationships exhibited the same abundances. Next, the taxa with the lowest taxonomic levels (e.g., the genera Thiovirga, Thiobacillus, Desulfomicrobium, and Candidatus_Nitrotoga) were selected to investigate their relationships with the distance from Dongwangsha. The genus Desulfomicrobium was only present at the Anqing location, while the other three genera were all positively correlated with the distances between sampling sites and the mouth of the estuary (Thiovirga: p = 0.001, R2 = 0.594; Thiobacillus: p = 0.008, R2 = 0.429; Candidatus_Nitrotoga: p = 0.018, R2 = 0.358).
In this study, we reported the first high-depth coverage taxonomic survey of planktonic bacterial and archaeal communities in the upper section of the tidal reach of Yangtze River and the response patterns of these communities to the inherent spatial heterogeneity of the region.
Our findings showed that the predominant bacterial communities in this river section were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria, which were all once abundant in many of the freshwater lakes and reservoirs in China32 and exhibited high abundances in some other freshwater environments30,33,34,35. From these findings, we found that the bacterial communities in this section of Yangtze River exhibited a typical feature of freshwater populations. Additionally, although the bacterial community at the Jingjiang location, which was the nearest to the mouth of the estuary, was significantly different from that in other locations, the beta-Proteobacteria class, which is thought to be distributed primarily in freshwaters36,37, showed the highest relative abundance at this location. Thus, we concluded that the freshwater bacterial community structure in this river section was consistent with the results showing lack of salinity and with a previous report showing that this river section was within the upper reaches of the tidal current limit9. However, we also found that the predominant phylum of Proteobacteria was negatively correlated with the geographical distances between the sampling sites and the mouth of the estuary, indicating that the bacterial community compositions of this river section may be affected by some factors induced by inherent spatial heterogeneity.
Although bacterial communities have been studied extensively, studies of the archaeaplankton community in freshwater are relatively scarce. Nevertheless, previous studies have shown that the dominant archaeal communities were significantly diverse, even at the phylum level. The predominant archaeaplankton phylum in this river section was Euryarchaeota, which was consistent with the results of a study in the Jiulong River Watershed20 but different from the results of a study of the freshwater area of Pearl River24. The predominant phylum in the freshwater area of Pearl River was Thaumarchaeota, similar to that of Yellowstone Lake38. Additionally, the results of studies on planktonic archaeal communities in Taihu Lake in China and Vilar Lake in Spain15,39 showed that the dominant phyla were Crenarchaeota, Euryarchaeota, and Parvarchaeota (in decreasing order) for Taihu Lake and Crenarchaeota and Euryarchaeota (in decreasing order) for Vilar Lake.
The regression analysis in the present study showed that among the 11 main classes, only the relative abundances of marine group I and unranked Thaumarchaeota were negatively correlated with the distances between the sampling sites and the mouth of the estuary, similar to the response patterns of some bacterial populations. Additionally, the predominant bacterial phylum of Proteobacteria was negatively correlated with the geographical distances between the sampling sites and the mouth of the estuary, whereas only the classes of marine group I and unranked Thaumarchaeota, whose relative abundances were low, showed the same trend, indicating that the planktonic archaeal community was somewhat less sensitive to the changes in inherent heterogeneity associated with geographic distance. This finding was further supported by our functional diversity analysis. Moreover, our regression analysis showed that most of the function of the bacterial community was affected by the distances between the sampling sites and the mouth of the estuary; in contrast, only the archaeal function of cytoskeleton was affected. These findings may also be supported by analysis of the specific bacterial and archaeal taxa, where more sampling sites existed for more specific bacterial taxa than for archaeal taxa. Functional diversity analysis also showed that the gene abundances of all predictive functional groups in the bacterial community were higher than those in the archaeal community, suggesting that the bacterial community played a greater role than the archaeal community in this river section.
Interestingly, we found that Chao index values but not the Shannon index values of the bacterial and archaeal communities were negatively correlated with the geographical distances between the sampling sites and the mouth of estuary, suggesting that the effects may have occurred from a region below the river section. It is possible that some more adaptable marine bacterial and archaeal taxa may disperse, causing changes in the richness of the bacterial and archaeal communities in the upper section of the tidal reach of Yangtze River. However, these changes were not great enough to also cause changes in diversity.
Ordination analysis of bacterial and archaeal communities also provided evidence of the differences between sampling sites, where more sample groups from the same sites could be separated based on bacterial communities. This confirmed our results showing that the bacterial community was more sensitive than the archaeal community to the distances from the mouth of the estuary in the upper section of the tidal reach of Yangtze River.
Linear regression analysis indicated that the distance from the mouth of the estuary may affect the bacterial and archaeal communities by altering the concentrations of sulphate and nitrate. Additionally, evaluation of the linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe) showed that the Anqing location was specific for bacterial groups related to sulphur and nitrogen recycling. Accordingly, the abundances of these groups were positively correlated with the distance from the mouth of the estuary, supporting our above-mentioned conclusions. Moreover, the concentrations of sulphate and nitrate may be negatively correlated with the distance from the estuary owing to the accumulation of pollutants from cities along the riverside40. Thus, the spatial heterogeneity which made the structures of bacterioplankton and archaeaplankton communities all present some linear distribution features in the upper section of the tidal reach in Yangtze River was closely related to the concentration changes of sulphate and nitrate caused by the accumulation of pollutants from cities along the riverside. Nevertheless, some other parameters might also be factors affecting the spatial heterogeneity in this river section. Salinity, in particular, which was not detected in this study, might show slight changes along this river section, and affect the distribution of some bacterial and archaeal species in this river section. And because the tidal limit and tidal current limit are affected by the energy of the tide41, runoff, and topographical features of the river42, these factors are also likely to affect the spatial heterogeneity of this river section. Then, the responses of bacterial and archaeal communities in the upper section of the tidal reach of Yangtze River to variations in geographic distances from the mouth of the estuary could also be attributed to the mixed effects of the factors above. Importantly, additional physicochemical parameters not examined in this study may also be involved.
In summary, our results showed the bacterioplankton and archaeaplankton community’s compositions in the upper section of tidal reach in Yangze River generally presented the characteristics of their freshwater populations. However, the distributions of them in this river section were affected by spatial heterogeneity which was closely related to the concentration changes of sulphate and nitrate. In addition, the bacterioplankton community was more sensitive than the archaeaplankton community to changes in the spatial characteristics of this river section. However, owing to the fact that the physical-chemical parameters selected were not so much, then additional physicochemical parameters not examined in this study may also be involved affecting the distributions of bacterioplankton and archaeaplankton communities. In the future, if more targeted parameters are selected, and the method of metagenome sequencing is used for investigating the bacterioplankton and archaeaplankton communities in this river section, then more valuable results could be obtained.
The water samples were collected from five locations in the tidal reach of Yangtze River (Fig. 5) from August 25–28, 2015. ArcGIS 10.2 software (http://resources.arcgis.com/zh-cn/home/) was used to generate the map. The geographical position information (longitude and latitude coordinates) for these locations is listed in Table S1. The Dongwangsha site (N31.35°E121.58°) located in the estuary area was considered the starting point to calculate the distance between sampling sites and the mouth area of the estuary. A river cross-section was designated in each sampling location, and three repeated samplings were performed for each section. Five hundred millilitres of water was collected at each time at a depth of 100 cm below the surface and was filtered through a 0.2-μm (47-mm diameter) pore size hydrophilic polyethersulphone membrane to obtain microbe samples for our analysis. Samples were stored at −80 °C until use. At the end of the experiment, 15 samples were obtained from sampling locations at Anqing, Tongling, Wuhu, Nanjing, and Jingjiang.
DNA extraction, 16S rRNA gene amplification, and pyrosequencing analysis
DNA was extracted in duplicate from membrane filters using a PowerWater DNA Isolation Kit (MO BIO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The DNA was quantified and then stored at −20 °C until further use.
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify the V3–V4 hypervariable region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and the V3–V6 hypervariable region of the archaeal 16S rRNA gene. The primers used for bacterial 16S rRNA gene PCR amplification were 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′), and the primers for archaeal 16S rRNA gene PCR amplification were Arch344F (5′-ACGGGGYGCAGCAGGCGCGA-3′) and Arch915R (5′-GTGCTCCCCCGCCAATTCCT-3′). All primers contained barcodes for each sample43. The products from the three replicate amplifications of the bacterial or archaeal 16S rRNA gene were pooled and evaluated on 2% agarose gels (TBE buffer). Amplicons were purified with a DNA gel extraction kit (Axygen, China), quantified with a QuantiFluorTM-ST fluorometer (Promega, Madison, WI, USA), pooled at equimolar concentrations, and finally sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq PE300 platform at Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
The acquired sequences were filtered by evaluating the data quality and removing primers and barcodes using Trimmomatic and FLASH software. The filtering steps were performed as previously described30. Unique sequences were clustered into OTUs with similarities greater than 97%44 using the Usearch program (version 7.1; http://drive5.com/uparse). Sequences were then assigned to taxa using the Ribosomal Database Project classifier45 compared with the SILVA bacterial and archaeal database (version 119; http://www.arb-silva.de) at a 70% confidence level. We used the method of Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology (QIIME) to analyse the community richness (Chao 1 estimator: http://www.mothur.org/wiki/chao) and the community diversity (Shannon index: http://www.mothur.org/wiki/Shannon). NMD) was performed using R language.
PICRUSt software (Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States, version 1.0.0) was used to explore the functional profiles of our bacterial and archaeal community datasets46. The eggNOG database (evolutionary genealogy of genes: Non-supervised Orthologous Groups, version 4.5; http://eggnog.embl.de/) was used to annotate functional information47. The function abundance profile was created based on the abundance of all OTUs and their corresponding COG functional annotations.
We characterised microorganisms specific to different grouping types by the LEfSe method, which evaluated both statistical significance and biological relevance48.
Determination of physicochemical parameters
Total nitrogen and total phosphorus were measured using the alkaline potassium persulphate oxidation method. The potassium permanganate index (COD) was measured using the acidic potassium permanganate oxidation method. Cholorophyll a was measured with the ethanol extraction spectrophotometric method. Nessler colorimetric assays were used to measure the concentration of ammonia in water. The concentration of nitrite in water was measured with a DIONEX ICS 3000 Ion Chromatograph. The cadmium, copper, lead, zinc, and arsenic levels in water were measured with a Beifen-Ruili WFX-210 atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Mercury was measured with a LEEMAN Hydra AA mercury analyser. The oil in water was measured with a Varian Cary Eclipse Fluorescence Spectrophotometer. The salinity in water was measured with a Huguang (Shanghai, China) SYC1–2 salinity meter.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and linear regressions analysis with the “Enter” or “Stepwise” method were performed using SPSS 20.0 software. Results with p values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
How to cite this article: Fan, L. et al. Spatial distribution of planktonic bacterial and archaeal communities in the upper section of the tidal reach in Yangtze River. Sci. Rep. 6, 39147; doi: 10.1038/srep39147 (2016).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Hahn, M. W. The microbial diversity of inland waters. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17, 256–261 (2006).
Cavicchioli, R. Cold-adapted archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol 4, 331–343 (2006).
Ochsenreiter, T., Pfeifer, F. & Schleper, C. Diversity of Archaea in hypersaline environments characterized by molecular-phylogenetic and cultivation studies. Extremophiles 6, 267–274 (2002).
Miroshnichenko, M. L. Thermophilic Microbial Communities of Deep-Sea Hydrothermal Vents. Microbiology 73, 1–13 (2003).
Salvador, M., Figueras, C. G., De & González-Pastor, J. E. Diversity of Archaea in Icelandic hot springs based on 16S rRNA and chaperonin genes. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 77, 165–175 (2011).
Christa, S., German, J. & Melanie, J. Genomic studies of uncultivated archaea. Nat Rev Microbiol 3, 479–488 (2005).
Offre, P., Spang, A. & Schleper, C. Archaea in biogeochemical cycles. Annu Rev Microbiol 67, 437–457 (2013).
Aller, J. Y. & Kemp, P. F. Are Archaea inherently less diverse than Bacteria in the same environments? FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65, 74–87 (2008).
Han-Xing, X. U., Fan, L. F. & Ming-Jie, G. U. On tidal mark and tidal current mark in the Yangtze River. Port & Waterway Engineering 6, 15–20 (2012).
Kirchman, D. L., Dittel, A. I., Malmstrom, R. R. & Cottrell, M. T. Biogeography of major bacterial groups in the Delaware Estuary. Limnol Oceanogr 50, 1697–1706 (2005).
Jones, P. R., Cottrell, M. T., Kirchman, D. L. & Dexter, S. C. Bacterial community structure of biofilms on artificial surfaces in an estuary. Microb Ecol 53, 153–162 (2007).
Sakami, T. Seasonal and spatial variation of bacterial community structure in river-mouth areas of Gokasho bay, Japan. Microbes Environ 23, 277–284 (2008).
Angert, E. R. et al. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of a bacterial community in Sulphur River, Parker Cave, Kentucky. Am Mineral 83, 1583–1592 (1998).
Peixoto, J. C., Leomil, L., Souza, J. V., Peixoto, F. B. & Astolfi-Filho, S. Comparison of bacterial communities in the Solimões and Negro River tributaries of the Amazon River based on small subunit rRNA gene sequences. Genet Mol Res 10, 3783–3793 (2011).
Li, J. et al. Annual periodicity in planktonic bacterial and archaeal community composition of eutrophic Lake Taihu. Scientific Reports 5 (2015).
Karim, M. A. Bacterial status and pollution level in the water of Gulshan lake in Dhaka. Bangladesh Journal of Zoology 40, 165–173 (2012).
Liu, Y. et al. Bacterial Diversity of Freshwater Alpine Lake Puma Yumco on the Tibetan Plateau. Geomicrobiology 26, 131–145 (2009).
Pelin, Y. et al. Ecological structuring of bacterial and archaeal taxa in surface ocean waters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 81, 373–385 (2012).
Singh, S. K. et al. Response of bacterioplankton to iron fertilization of the Southern Ocean, Antarctica. Front Microbiol 6, 863 (2015).
Hu, A. et al. Archaeal community in a human-disturbed watershed in southeast China: diversity, distribution, and responses to environmental changes. Appl Microbiol Biot 1–14 (2016).
Fortunato, C. S. & Crump, B. C. Bacterioplankton community variation across river to ocean environmental gradients. Microb Ecol 62, 374–382 (2011).
Fortunato, C. S., Herfort, L., Zuber, P., Baptista, A. M. & Crump, B. C. Spatial variability overwhelms seasonal patterns in bacterioplankton communities across a river to ocean gradient. ISME J 6, 554–563 (2012).
Rappé, M. S., Vergin, K. & Giovannoni, S. J. Phylogenetic comparisons of a coastal bacterioplankton community with its counterparts in open ocean and freshwater systems. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 33, 219–232 (2000).
Jiwen, L., Shaolan, Y., Meixun, Z., Biyan, H. & Xiao-Hua, Z. Shifts in archaeaplankton community structure along ecological gradients of Pearl Estuary. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 90, 424–435 (2014).
Shade, A., Jones, S. E. & McMahon, K. D. The influence of habitat heterogeneity on freshwater bacterial community composition and dynamics. Environ Microbiol 10, 1057–1067 (2008).
Bordalo, A. A. Effects of salinity on bacterioplankton: field and microcosm experiments. J Appl Microbiol 75, 393–398 (2008).
Evangelisti, M., D’Amelia, D., Lallo, G. D., Thaller, M. C. & Migliore, L. The Relationship between Salinity and Bacterioplankton in Three Relic Coastal Ponds (Macchiatonda Wetland, Italy). Journal of Water Resource & Protection 05, 859–866 (2013).
Crump, B. C., Kling, G. W., Michele, B. & Hobbie, J. E. Bacterioplankton community shifts in an arctic lake correlate with seasonal changes in organic matter source. Appl Environ Microbiol 69, 2253–2268 (2003).
Bier, R. L., Voss, K. A. & Bernhardt, E. S. Bacterial community responses to a gradient of alkaline mountaintop mine drainage in Central Appalachian streams. Isme J 9 (2014).
Fan, L. M. et al. Bacterioplankton community analysis in tilapia ponds by Illumina high-throughput sequencing. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 32 (2016).
Boujelben, I. et al. Spatial and seasonal prokaryotic community dynamics in ponds of increasing salinity of Sfax solar saltern in Tunisia. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 101, 845–857 (2012).
Liu, L., Yang, J., Yu, Z. & Wilkinson, D. M. The biogeography of abundant and rare bacterioplankton in the lakes and reservoirs of China. Isme J 9 (2015).
GloCkner, F. O. et al. Comparative 16S rRNA analysis of lake bacterioplankton reveals globally distributed phylogenetic clusters including an abundant group of actinobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 5053–5065 (2000).
Staley, C. et al. Core functional traits of bacterial communities in the Upper Mississippi River show limited variation in response to land cover. Front Microbiol 5, 414 (2014).
Sánchez, L. M., Schiaffino, M. R., Pizarro, H. & Izaguirre, I. Periphytic and planktonic bacterial community structure in turbid and clear shallow lakes of the pampean plain (Argentina): A CARD-FISH approach. Lat Am J Aquat Res 43, 662–674 (2015).
Gl?Ckner, F. O., Fuchs, B. M. & Amann, R. Bacterioplankton compositions of lakes and oceans: a first comparison based on fluorescence in situ hybridization. Appl Environ Microbiol 65, 3721–3726 (1999).
Zwart, G., Crump, B. C., Agterveld, M., Hagen, F. & Han, S. K. Typical freshwater bacteria: an analysis of available 16S rRNA gene sequences from plankton of lakes and rivers. Aquat Microb Ecol 28, 141–155 (2002).
Kan, J. et al. Archaea in Yellowstone Lake. Isme J 5, 1784–1795 (2011).
Llirós, M., Casamayor, E. O. & Borrego, C. High archaeal richness in the water column of a freshwater sulfurous karstic lake along an interannual study. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 66, 331–342 (2008).
Dan, L. I., Deng, B., Zhang, G. S. & Zhang, Y. Y. Change characteristics of major ions and their influence factors in Yangtze Estuary in recent years. Journal of East China Normal University 30, 34–42 (2010).
Gerkema, T. Comment on “Internal-tide energy over topography” by S. M. Kelly et al. J Geophys Res 116 (2011).
Marinone, S. G. Effect of the topographic stress on the tide- and wind-induced residual currents in the Gulf of California. J Geophys Res 1031, 18437–18446 (1998).
Su, Y., Bian, G., Zhu, Z., Smidt, H. & Zhu, W. Early methanogenic colonisation in the faeces of Meishan and Yorkshire piglets as determined by pyrosequencing analysis. Archaea 2014, 547908–547908 (2014).
Stackebrandt, E. & Goebel, B. M. Taxonomic Note: A Place for DNA-DNA Reassociation and 16S rRNA Sequence Analysis in the Present Species Definition in Bacteriology. Int J Syst Bacteriol 846–849 (1994).
Luo, J. et al. Microbial community structures in a closed raw water distribution system biofilm as revealed by 454-pyrosequencing analysis and the effect of microbial biofilm communities on raw water quality. Bioresour Technol 148, 189–195 (2013).
Langille, M. G. I. et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31, 814–821 (2013).
Huertacepas, J. et al. eggNOG 4.5: a hierarchical orthology framework with improved functional annotations for eukaryotic, prokaryotic and viral sequences. Nucleic Acids Resh 44, D286–D293 (2015).
Ling, Z. et al. Impacts of infection with different toxigenic Clostridium difficile strains on faecal microbiota in children. Sci Rep 4, 7485–7485 (2013).
This research was supported by the Special Fund from Ministry of Agriculture of the China (Monitoring and assessment of fishery ecological environment in lower reaches of Yangtze River).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Fan, L., Song, C., Meng, S. et al. Spatial distribution of planktonic bacterial and archaeal communities in the upper section of the tidal reach in Yangtze River. Sci Rep 6, 39147 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39147
Spatiotemporal Analysis of the Water and Sediment Nile Microbial Community Along an Urban Metropolis
Microbial Ecology (2021)
Geomicrobiology Journal (2021)
Determinants of bacterioplankton structures in the typically turbid Weihe River and its clear tributaries from the northern foot of the Qinling Mountains
Ecological Indicators (2021)
Abundance, community structure and diversity of nitrifying bacterial enrichments from low and high saline brackishwater environments
Letters in Applied Microbiology (2021)
Planktonic Bacterial and Archaeal Communities in an Artificially Irrigated Estuarine Wetland: Diversity, Distribution, and Responses to Environmental Parameters