Abstract
Methyl salicylate (MeSA) is a volatile organic compound synthesized from salicylic acid (SA) a plant hormone that helps to fight against plant disease. Seed treatment with MeSA, is an encouraging method to the seed industry to produce more growth and yield. The aim of our study is to find out the growth, development and disease tolerance of rice seed treated with different concentrations of MeSA. Also the seed treatments were studied to determine whether they directly influenced seedling emergence and growth in rice (Oryza sativa L) cultivars ‘IR 20, IR 50, IR 64, ASD 16, ASD 19 and ADT 46’ under greenhouse condition. MeSA seed treatments at 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg/L significantly increased seedling emergence. Effects were stronger in IR 50, and IR 64 and the effects were dose dependent, although the relationship between dose and effect was not always linear. MeSA seed treated rice plant against bacterial blight were analyzed. Bacterial blight was more effectively controlled by the seed treated with 100 mg/L than others. These results suggest that seed treatment with MeSA alters plant physiology in ways that may be useful for crop production as well as protection.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Plants are one of the basic staple food, for all forms of life. We depend on plants for food and medicine, plant derivatives, regulation of the hydrologic cycle. Plants are essential to the balance of nature1. For more than half of the world’s population “Rice is life”. Rice is an economic crop for the farmers and major food staple for the world. Rice provides the main source of food energy for at least one third of the world’s population2,3,4. Rice is an essential part of the daily meal in Southern and Eastern parts of India and Asia. However most the rice plant are affected by the Bacterial blight caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae (Xoo) and it is one of the most important bacterial diseases of rice. Heavy yield losses due to X. oryzae was reported during last one decade3,5,6.
Seed germination is one of the early and vital stages in the plant life cycle. Improved germination of seeds is one process which can improve the economic success of crop by ultimately enhancing the yield. The process of seed germination may be regulated by external factors, including temperature, light, soil moisture and salinity, metal or mineral composition7,8.
Treatments of seed include applications of chemical agents, biological substances, or physical processes, to increase agricultural production. The seed treatment helps to protect seedlings from insects and disease which pose devastating consequences to crop production during critical growth stages. The application of treatments to seeds promotes stronger and healthier roots, leading to uniform seedling emergence, with improved crop performance9,10.
Seed priming is a method of pre-sowing treatments that exposes seeds to a certain solutions that allows partial hydration until the germination process begins11,12,13.Various seed priming techniques have been reported to enhance germination and allow for more uniform seed emergence, increasing nutrient reserves through increased physiological activities and increased yield in the crop14.
Various common methods utilized for priming seeds includes: hydro priming, (soaking in water); osmopriming (soaking seed in osmotic solutions); thermopriming (treatment of seed with low or high temperatures); solid matrix priming (treatment of seed with solid matrices); and bio priming (hydration using biological compounds)15. Halo priming (soaking seed in salt solutions), and priming with plant growth hormones are also performed along with thermo priming, and on-farm priming16.
The mechanism of rice seed priming techniques which uses plant growth regulators may enhance rice performance. Plant hormones or bio-stimulants are also known to improve plant population and increase productivity. Presoaking seeds with optimal concentrations of plant growth hormones, such as auxin (IAA), gibberellins (GA), abscisic acid, ethylene (ET), Salicylic acid (SA) and Jasmonic acid (JA) have been shown to benefit germination performance and yield of some crop species growth under both normal and stress conditions17,18,19. The effects of seed priming by soaking seeds of sorghum, rice, or wheat in water, are reported to enhance germination rates. Some strategies for more vigorous plants report improved seedling emergence under induced stress conditions20,21.
SA is a natural phenolic compound that plays a role in the regulation of physiological and biochemical processes. SA is chemically known as 2-hydroxy benzoic acid is a member of phenolic compounds, containing of an aromatic ring bearing a hydroxyl group which is synthesized by the plant22. These hydroxyl groups are involved in lignin biosynthesis; others serve as allelopathic compounds, regulate plant responses to abiotic stress and disease resistance by inducing antimicrobial defense compounds termed phytoalexins or by signaling defense activation23,24,25,26.
Exogenous application of SA act as potential antioxidant capacity inducers, also increase the levels of hydrogen peroxide in plants. These pathways also regulate many physiological processes in plants, such as increased germination rate, cell growth, stomatal opening, photosynthesis and ion uptake27. Methyl salicylate (MeSA) is a volatile organic compound which is synthesized from SA. MeSA is associated with induced resistance plant defense which has been used in effective disease control methods28,29,30.
Seed treatment with MeSA can be used to enhance rice seed germination and seedling growth. We studied the performance of rice seed priming with different concentrations of MeSA (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg/L). Variables assessed include: germination rate, growth of root and shoot heights (cm), biomass of fresh and dry weights of the shoots and roots (mg) disease incidence, mean lesion lengths, disease index and disease incidence of different rice varieties under greenhouse conditions.
Results
Germination responses after seed treatment with MeSA on rice seed in greenhouse condition
The seed pretreatment of different concentration of MeSA (i.e. 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg/L) had significant (P < 0.05) effects on the final germination percentage and germination rates (Figs 1 and 2). Treated seeds with MeSA had significantly higher percentage of germination than those in control. Treatment of ‘IR 20, IR 50, IR 64, ASD 16, ASD 19 and ADT 46’ rice varieties with MeSA increased the rate of seedling emergence (Fig. 1A–F). Emergence of rice varieties were more pronounced in all MeSA treatment with 100 mg/L concentration being statistically different with all other treatments. For example 80% germination was observed within 8 days in IR 20 rice varieties after seed treated with 100 mg/L. All the rice varieties treated with MeSA, had greater emergence values compared with control rice plant. In ‘IR 20’ 20% emergence, 40% emergence, 60% emergence and 80% emergence occurred earlier in MeSA treated plants than in control plants (20%-F4,30 = 3.08; P < 0.0031; 40%- F4,30 = 2.75; P < 0.046, 60%- F4,30 = 3.56; P < 0.08 and 80%- F4,25 = 5.10; P < 0.004) (Fig. 2A) there was a trend towards faster emergence with increased concentration seed treatment rates. The same developments were observed in rice variety ‘IR 50’ seedling emergence (20%-F4,30 = 2.62; P < 0.055; 40%- F4,30 = 3.24; P < 0.025, 60%- F4,30 = 2.65; P < 0.053 and 80%- F4,29 = 4.24; P < 0.008) (Fig. 2B).
Germination percentage was influenced by MeSA seed treatment, but influence was more pronounced in 100 mg/L than other treatments. Control seeds emerged at lower than 20% at 4 days. However most of the treated rice seeds germinated at 20%, except (IR 20 and ASD 19), at 4 days, being statistically significant. The same observation was noticed in rice varieties ‘IR 64’ (20%-F4,30 = 3.28; P < 0.024; 40%- F4,30 = 2.48; P < 0.065, 60%- F4,30 = 2.84; P < 0.041 and 80%- F4,26 = 2.33; P < 0.082) (Fig. 2C), ‘ASD 16’ (20%-F4,30 = 3.05; P < 0.032; 40%- F4,30 = 2.31; P < 0.081, 60%- F4,28 = 5.49; P < 0.002 and 80%- F4,13 = 2.95; P < 0.061) (Fig. 2D).
The germination rate of seeds was increased after treatment with MeSA in resistant rice varieties ASD 19 (20%-F4,30 = 3.06; P < 0.031; 40%- F4,30 = 3.80; P < 0.013, 60%- F4,28 = 5.61; P < 0.002 and 80%- F4,13 = 3.19; P < 0.049) (Fig. 2E) and ADT 46 (20%-F4,30 = 2.88; P < 0.040; 40%- F4,30 = 2.78; P < 0.045, 60%- F4,27 = 5.46; P < 0.002 and 80%- F4,11 = 3.17; P < 0.058) (Fig. 2F). Compared with control, the seeds showed greater germination rates when treated with MeSA. The germination rates were significantly greater when treated with MeSA at 100 mg/L.
Seed-priming treatments with MeSA significantly enhanced the seedling growth of rice compared with non-treated control. The greatest effect was observed from seed-coating treatments of 100 mg/L MeSA (Fig. 3). On average, seed priming treatments significantly increased the shoot length by 40.78% (F4,30 = 14.88; P < 0.0001), 24.31% (F4,30 = 17.05; P < 0.0001), 20.90%(F4,30 = 10.73; P < 0.0001), 35.34% (F4,30 = 7.30; P < 0.0001), 25.90% (F4,30 = 7.88; P < 0.0001) and 34.82% (F4,30 = 11.10; P < 0.001) for IR 20, IR 50, IR 64, ASD 16, ASD 19 and ADT 46 respectively compared with control. The same trend was also noticed in root length after treatment with 100 mg/L MeSA. For example 54.46% increased root length was observed in ASD 16 after treatment with 100 mg/L MeSA which was significantly different from control (F4, 30 = 11.25; P < 0.0001). Insignificant difference was observed between treatments of 75 and 100 mg/L MeSA.
Treatment of seeds with MeSA also improved root: shoot ratio of the rice seedlings under greenhouse condition. For ‘ASD 16’, the effect of MeSA seed treatment was significant for root: shoot ratio (F4,30 = 4.44; P < 0.006) (Fig. 4A). Interestingly, there was a non-linear response for IR 50 and IR 64, root: shoot ratios and they were not significant between 25–100 mg/L treatments (F4, 30 = 3.73; P < 1.00 and F4, 30 = 3.98; P < 1.00 for IR 50 and IR 64 respectively) (Fig. 4A). Further we have observed significant growth of root and shoot morphologically after seed were treated with MeSA (Fig. 4B).
All the seed treatments had significant effects on fresh and dry weight of shoot and root (Fig. 5). Shoot fresh weight significantly increased in seedlings raised from seeds treated with 75 and 100 mg/L MeSA. Maximum shoot fresh weight of 457.4 mg was attained in ASD 16 seeds treated with 100 mg/L MeSA after 20 days as compare to control (361.8 mg) (Fig. 5). However minimum shoot fresh weight of 270.66 mg was observed in control seeds of IR 50 after 20 days. Shoot and root fresh and dry weights of ‘IR 20, IR 50, IR 64, ASD 16, ASD 19 and ADT 46 treated and untreated plants are shown in Fig. 5A–X. Seed treatment with 100 mg/L MeSA significantly increased shoot fresh weights (F4,20 = 14.69, P < 0.0001-IR 20; F4,20 = 5.75, P < 0.003-IR 50; F4,20 = 7.69, P < 0.001-IR 64; F4,20 = 7.18, P < 0.001-ASD 16; F4,20 = 3.22, P < 0.035-ASD 19; F4,20 = 3.91, P < 0.017-ADT 46) and dry weights (F4,20 = 24.08, P < 0.0001-IR 20; F4,20 = 69.90, P < 0.0001-IR 50; F4,20 = 7.88, P < 0.001-IR 64; F4,20 = 29.06, P < 0.001-ASD 16; F4,20 = 7.60, P < 0.001-ASD 19; F4,20 = 13.31, P < 0.0001-ADT 46) at 22 days post treatment. The same linear growth pattern was observed both in fresh and dry weight of root after seed treatment with MeSA. In general, a positive relationship was observed between seed treatment concentration rate and root and shoot weights (Fig. 5).
Control of bacterial blight under greenhouse condition
The effect of MeSA seed treatment in suppressing bacterial blight disease was analyzed under greenhouse condition. Bacterial blight disease lesion length (mm) (Fig. 6) and Disease index (Fig. 7) was found to be significantly lower in 100 mg/L MeSA seed treated rice plant. However other lower seed treatments also found to be effective than control. The bacterial blight disease lesion length (mm) was 2.94 mm in control but the ADT 46 rice seed treated with 100 mg/L was inoculated with X. oryzae lesion length (mm) measured as 1.92 mm (F4,20 = 4.39, P < 0.01) (Fig. 6). However we did not observe any significant difference between control and 25 mg/L MeSA seed treated rice ADT 46 plant (F4,20 = 4.39, P < 0.93).
The same trend was observed in disease index. The disease index (DI) was higher in (39.2%) control IR 20 plant and the DI was significantly lower in IR 20 rice plant in which the seed was treated with 100 mg/L MeSA (26.40%) (F4,20 = 6.33, P < 0.002) (Fig. 7). Even though three rice varieties (i.e. ASD 16, ASD 19 and ADT 46) are resistant to bacterial blight disease, seed treatment with MeSA further enhance the resistant against the bacterial blight disease and it was proved by the disease index experiment.
Discussion
Treatment of seeds with MeSA increased rate of germination and rice growth. The amount of effect differed among rice varieties and effects were dose rate dependent. Also, effects appeared to be more pronounced at 75 and 100 mg/L seed treatments under normal greenhouse conditions. MeSA influences seed germination, seedling establishment, cell growth, respiration, stomatal closure, senescence-associated gene expression, basal thermotolerance, nodulation in legumes, and fruit yield25,31.
Most consistent response to MeSA seed treatment in this research was an increase in rate of emergence of seeds and biomass of the rice plants after sowing. The effect of MeSA was stronger both in ‘IR 20 and IR 50’ than other rice varieties, which produced higher seedling emergence rates (Kalaivani and Senthil-Nathanunpublished data).
This study shows that rice plant could be induced by exogenous application of the signaling compounds MeSA. The allelopathic potential of the root and shoot of rice thus increased after treatment with MeSA (Figs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). The same effect was observed in the rice strains IAC165 and Huajingxian32. In the present study MeSA treatment with 100 mg/L of rice seed showed enhanced effects on emergence and biomass of rice seedlings. Other studies have also shown that natural plant products can enhance defense system of plant along with protection from pest and diseases33,34,35. Further plant hormonal and other treatments enhanced seedling vigor as measured in longer shoot and root lengths, with increased fresh and dry weights. Accelerated cell division and enlargement of cell explain the production of vigorous seedlings by pre-sowing seed treatment with plant growth regulators16.
Several studies have shown impact of MeSA seed treatment on germination and early seedling growth. Enhanced germination, emergence and growth were recorded in wheat, Triticum aestivum L. when the seeds were subjected to pre-sowing seed-soaking treatment in salicylic acid36. 3 Senthil-Nathan et al.37 reported that neem treatment on rice resulted in increased production and diseases tolerance than control. Hayat et al.38 observed the grains of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. Raj-3077) were soaked in 0, 10−5, 10−4 and 10−3M aqueous solutions of seedlings possessed significantly greater leaf numbers, fresh and dry mass. The present finding gained support from these previous reports.
Shakirova et al.39 conclude that pre-sowing T. aestivum seed treatment with SA leads to an activation of germination and seedling growth. The enhancement results in the division of root apical cells which is an important contribution to the growth stimulating effect of SA. Shakirova36 has confirmed with field experiments. In the field, wheat plants pretreated with SA were characterized with increased size of ears, grain yield, indicating prolonged effect of pre-sowing treatment of seeds, which produced stimultative effect on the productivity of wheat, at harvest.
Rate of seedling emergence was increased approximately 25% at seed treatment with 75 and 100 mg/L MeSA. Emergence of ‘IR 20, IR 50 and ASD 16’ seedlings was significantly faster in MeSA treated seeds, but it is not linear with treatment doses. The percentage of emergence (20, 40, 60 and 80%) at the different seed treatment rates indicated that emergence increased with seed treatment concentration rate, with faster emergence from seeds treated with 100 mg/L MeSA. The increased percentage of emergence and biomass with increasing dose is probably due to increased SA in plant cells, as reported in other crops. For example, increased percentage of emergence and growth was observed by Singh and Usha40 and Dolatabadian et al.41 in wheat seeds, Tavares et al.28 in rice, Khodary42 in maize, Jadhav and Bhamburdekar43 and Szepesi et al.44 in tomato, Martin-Mex et al.45 in African violet, McCue et al.46 in pea seeds, Almeida et al.47 in wheat and barley seeds which revealed that MeSA accelerates germination greatly. Seed treatment with MeSA may help in the metabolic pentose phosphate pathway, benefiting the hydrolysis of reserves and increasing the availability of energy to the germination process and seedling emergence25.
Several reports were published in the last decade demonstrating the role of SA applied as seed soaking treatment on various physiological processes44,45,46,47. It was shown that the pre-soaking of pea seeds in SA had a beneficial effect on growth and photosynthesis48.
MeSA treatments produced measurable effects on root and shoot growth of rice seedling varieties. Gutierrez-Coronado et al.49 reported that foliar application of SA to the shoots of soybean plants positively affected the size of the root. Furthermore Sandoval-Yepiz50 reported similar findings with Tagetus erecta, using low concentrations (10−10 M) of SA. Increased shoot growth was observed in Clitoria sp. after application of salicylates51. A more in-depth study would be required to determine the specific modes of action of MeSA on non-linear growth of roots and shoots in different crops.
The increase observed in shoot and root weight when treated with MeSA, was dose dependent (75 and 100 mg/L). This response suggests that a greater portion of photosynthates was distributed to the roots than the shoots in seedlings developing from nontreated seeds as compared with seedlings developing from MeSA treated seeds25,36,52. The promoting effect of SA on the leaf area was attributed to its important roles on activating cell division, biosynthesis of organic foods, water uptake and stomatal resistance and tolerating water deficit better. In addition, mentioned that improving effect of SA on the ready availability of nutrients (i.e. N, P, K, Ca, and Mg) to the plant. Increased levels of mineral after treatment with SA were observed in maize53, tomato44 and cucumber54. These results are in support with many other researchers who reported an increased amount of nutrients in roots and shoot after treatments with SA27,55,56.
According to Stout et al.57 and Vazirimehr et al.27 plant seeds treated with SA have higher levels of amino acids, plant growth, ion uptake, transport enzyme activity and synthesis of plant hormones, that increase the plant responses to these proteins and these events provide significant increases in production and reduce time for the establishment of the crop field, being more tolerant against abiotic stresses. The data of the present study support the above hypothesis.
For more than two decades the plant hormone salicylic acid (SA) and its derivatives (MeSA) has been studied for its use to protect the plant. However, its systemic acquired signaling act in plants, particularly in defense against plant disease causing microbes, has only become more interest during last two decades31,57. Our research has clearly pointed out the MeSA has a potential to control the bacterial blight disease. Also seed treated with 100 mg/L has less blight lesion and diseases index. It was evident that SA and its derivatives act as a critical defense signal has come from analyses of plants in which endogenous SA levels were triggered or altered. It was proved in series of experiments in Arabidopsis (Transgenic tobacoo) expressing the bacterial nahG gene, encoding the SA-metabolizing enzyme salicylate hydroxylase31,58,59. In addition, endogenous SA levels increase in barley resisting infection by the bacterial pathogen P. syringae pv. syringae60. Also in rice homolog enhances resistance to the bacterial blight-causing X. oryzae61,62,63.
MeSA seed treatments (75 and 100 mg/L) significantly increased the emergence and early growth of rice plants. But the effect was non-linear across treatment concentrations and rice varieties. Further we conclude that use of MeSA in seed treatment has great potential for increasing uniform emergence, root and shoot length, root and shoot biomass. Thus, treatment of seeds with SA may produce favorable effects on rice growth. Also MeSA seed treatment has better protection against blight diseases.
Methods
Plant material and seed treatments
A commercial formulation of methyl salicylate (Methyl salicylate, Sigma-Aldrich) was used for all experiments. The rice varieties ‘IR 20, IR 50, IR 64, ASD 16, ASD 19 and ADT 46’ were used for this study. ‘IR 20, IR 50, IR 64’ are susceptible, conventional, semi-dwarf, long-grain aromatic variety with relatively high seedling vigor, whereas ‘ASD 16, ASD 19 and ADT 46’ are moderate resistance, conventional, semi-dwarf long grain variety with low seedling vigor. Rice were surface disinfected by immersing in 2% sodium hypochlorite for about two minutes and washed several times with sterilized water, then dried in sterilized filter paper.
Salicylate formulations and treatments consisted of increasing levels of 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100, mg/L of MeSA. A stock solution of MeSA 100 mg/L was used for successive dilutions in distilled water. The seeds were treated by applying 2 ml/kg of seed in each respective MeSA concentration according to methodology described by Tavares et al.28. The solution of MeSA with the different doses was directly placed at the bottom of the zip lock plastic bag. Then 250 g of seeds were added into each bag. They were agitated for 10 minutes. The seeds were spread out on clean paper and left to dry at room temperature for 24 hours. Treated seeds were used for further experiments.
Seed treatments under greenhouse conditions
‘IR 20, IR 50, IR 64, ASD 16, ASD 19 and ADT 46’ rice plants were grown by sowing five seeds of a single treatment rate (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg/L) in 0.5 L pots in a greenhouse. There were 7 pots (replicates) per treatment. The potting soil was composed of two parts of autoclaved silt loam soil with one part each of sand and peat moss. The experiment was conducted in early January and, as temperature regulation in the greenhouse was poor, temperatures fluctuated from 22° to 32 °C. Lighting was ambient, and pots were watered as needed.
Pots were observed daily for emergence of hypocotyls above the surface of the soil after sowing. The experiment was terminated after 12 days. For statistical analysis, days until 20%, 40% and 60% seedling emergence were calculated for each pot. At 12th day after sowing, all seedlings were removed from pots, counted, and cleaned with water. Maximum root length (cm/plant) shoot length (cm/plant), weight (both wet and dry weight in mg) for each plant were determined by using a ruler and monopan balance.
Germination was scored daily by counting emerging plant shoots. The experiment was terminated after 22 days. Percent emergence was calculated as in the greenhouse experiment. Roots and shoots were weighed after cleaning and patting dried with a paper towel. After taking fresh weights, plants were dried in an oven at 40 °C for two days and weighed.
Effect of MeSA seed treatment on the bacterial blight disease of rice under greenhouse conditions
Rice seed treated with MeSA were sown in earthen pots. The potting soil was composed of two parts of autoclaved silt loam soil with one part each of sand and peat moss and maintained under greenhouse conditions. Five replicates of five pots, each containing 5 plants, were maintained. X. oryzae inoculum was sub-cultured and grown individually in nutrient broth for 48 h and then centrifuged for 8000 × g for 15 m and then resuspended in sterile distilled water at 2 × 107CFU/ml. Inoculation was done on twenty-day old plant leaves by scissors-dip method30. In each pot, the number of plants showing symptoms was counted and lesion length was measured at 14 days post-inoculation. The values are represented as percent disease incidence (DI) (Formula 1) and mean lesion length (MLL) (Formula 2).
mean variance of disease index and disease incidence of five replications containing five plants in each pot were determined by Tukey-family error test (P < 0.05) by using Minitab®17
Statistical analysis
Treatment effects on the percentage of emergence, root and shoot weight, and root: shoot ratio, in rice plants were analyzed by analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA), and the treatment means were compared by Tukey-family error test (P < 0.05) by using Minitab®17 software package. The data on above said experiments were arcsine transformed (except percentage of emergence) before undergoing statistical analysis.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Kalaivani, K. et al. Effect of methyl salicylate (MeSA), an elicitor on growth, physiology and pathology of resistant and susceptible rice varieties. Sci. Rep. 6, 34498; doi: 10.1038/srep34498 (2016).
References
Larcher, W. Physiological plant ecology: ecophysiology and stress physiology of functional groups (Springer Science & Business Media, 2003).
Fresco, L. Rice is life. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 18, 249–253 (2005).
Senthil-Nathan, S. Biology, Behavioral and Population Dynamics of the Rice Leaffolder Complex: Dynamics of Insect Behavior (Scientific Publishers, Jodphur, pp. 156–167, 2011).
Senthil-Nathan, S., Kalaivani, K. & Murugan, K. Behavioural responses and changes in biology of rice leaffolder following treatment with a combination of bacterial toxin and botanical pesticides. Chemosphere 64, 1650–1658 (2006).
Niño‐Liu, D. O., Ronald, P. C. & Bogdanove, A. J. Xanthomonas oryzae pathovars: model pathogens of a model crop. Mol. Plant Pathol. 7, 303–324 (2006).
Nisha, S. et al. Effect of plant compounds on induced activities of defense-related enzymes and pathogenesis related protein in bacterial blight disease susceptible rice plant. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 80, 1–9 (2012).
Kuo, Y.-H., Rozan, P., Lambein, F., Frias, J. & Vidal-Valverde, C. Effects of different germination conditions on the contents of free protein and non-protein amino acids of commercial legumes. Food Chem. 86, 537–545 (2004).
Ghaderi-Far, F., Gherekhloo, J. & Alimagham, M. Influence of environmental factors on seed germination and seedling emergence of yellow sweet clover (Melilotus officinalis). Planta Daninha 28, 463–469 (2010).
Ling, L. et al. Effects of cold plasma treatment on seed germination and seedling growth of soybean. Sci. Rep. 4 (2014).
Bewley, J. D. & Black, M. Physiology and Biochemistry of Seeds in Relation to Germination: Volume 2: Viability, Dormancy, and Environmental Control (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012).
Maguire, J. D. Speed of germination-aid in selection and evaluation for seedling emergence and vigor. Crop Sci. 2, 176–177 (1962).
Heydecker, W., Higgins, J. & Gulliver, R. L. Accelerated germination by osmotic seed treatment. Nature 246, 42–44 (1973).
Harris, D. et al. On-farm seed priming in semi-arid agriculture: development and evaluation in maize, rice and chickpea in India using participatory methods. Exp. Agri. 35, 15–29 (1999).
Tian, Y. et al. Responses of seed germination, seedling growth, and seed yield traits to seed pretreatment in maize (Zea mays L.). Sci . World J. 1–8 (2014).
Jisha, K. C., Vijayakumari, K. & Puthur, J. T. Seed priming for abiotic stress tolerance: an overview. Acta Physiol. Planta 35, 381–396 (2013).
Ghassemi-Golezani, K., Aliloo, A. A., Valizadeh, M. & Moghaddam, M. Effects of different priming techniques on seed invigoration and seedling establishment of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). J. Food Agri. Env. 6, 222 (2008).
Reddy, M., Hynes, R. & Lazarovits, G. Relationship between in vitro growth inhibition of pathogens and suppression of preemergence damping-off and postemergence root rot of white bean seedlings in the greenhouse by bacteria. Can. J. Microbiol. 40, 113–119 (1994).
Senthil-Nathan, S., Kalaivani, K., Choi, M.-Y. & Paik, C.-H. Effects of jasmonic acid-induced resistance in rice on the plant brownhopper, Nilaparvata lugens Stål (Homoptera: Delphacidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 95, 77–84 (2009).
Jia, X., Meng, Q., Zeng, H., Wang, W. & Yin, H. Chitosan oligosaccharide induces resistance to Tobacco mosaic virus in Arabidopsis via the salicylic acid-mediated signalling pathway. Sci. Rep. 6 (2016).
Harris, D. et al. On-farm seed priming: using participatory methods to revive and refine a key technology. Agri. Sys. 69, 151–164 (2001).
Moghanibashi, M., Karimmojeni, H., Nikneshan, P. & Behrozi, D. Effect of hydropriming on seed germination indices of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under salt and drought conditions. Plant Knowl. J. 1, 10 (2012).
Santner, A. & Estelle, M. Recent advances and emerging trends in plant hormone signalling. Nature 459, 1071–1078 (2009).
Raskin, I. Role of salicylic acid in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 43, 439–463 (1992).
Humphreys, J. M. & Chapple, C. Rewriting the lignin roadmap. Curr. Opi. Plant Biol. 5, 224–229 (2002).
Yusuf, M., Hayat, S., Alyemeni, M. N., Fariduddin, Q. & Ahmad, A. In Salicylic Acid 15–30 (Springer, 2013).
Wiesel, L. et al. A transcriptional reference map of defence hormone responses in potato. Sci, Rep. 5 (2015).
Vazirimehr, M., Rigi, K. & Branch, Z. Effect of salicylic acid in agriculture. Int. J. Plant Anim. Environ. Sci. 4, 291–296 (2014)
Tavares, L. C., Rufino, C. A., Oliveira, S. d., Brunes, A. P. & Villela, F. A. Treatment of rice seeds with salicylic acid: seed physiological quality and yield. J. Seed Sci. 36, 352–356 (2014).
Tang, F., Fu, Y.-Y. & Ye, J.-R. The effect of methyl salicylate on the induction of direct and indirect plant defense mechanisms in poplar (Populus× euramericana ‘Nanlin 895’). J. Plant Inter. 10, 93–100 (2015).
Kauffman, H., Reddy, A., Hsieh, S. & Merca, S. Improved technique for evaluating resistance of rice varieties to Xanthomonas oryzae. Plant Dis. Rep. (1973).
Vlot, A. C., Dempsey, D. M. A. & Klessig, D. F. Salicylic acid, a multifaceted hormone to combat disease. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol. 47, 177–206 (2009).
Bi, H. H., Zeng, R. S., Su, L. M., An, M. & Luo, S. M. Rice allelopathy induced by methyl jasmonate and methyl salicylate. J. Chem. Ecol. 33, 1089–1103 (2007).
Senthil-Nathan, S. A review of biopesticides and their mode of action against insect pest’s. In Environmental Sustainability- Role of Green Technologies (Springer-Verlag, pp. 49–63, 2015).
Senthil-Nathan, S. Physiological and biochemical effect of Neem and other Meliaceae plants secondary metabolites against Lepidopteran insects. Front. Physiol. 4, 359 (2013).
Senthil-Nathan, S. Effects of Melia azedarach on nutritional physiology and enzyme activities of the rice leaffolder Cnaphalocrocis medinalis (Guenée) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 84, 98–108 (2006).
Shakirova, F. In Salicylic acid: a plant hormone 69–89 (Springer, 2007).
Senthil-Nathan, S. et al. Toxicity and physiological effects of neem pesticides applied to rice on the Nilaparvata lugens Stal, the brown planthopper. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 72, 1707–1713 (2009).
Hayat, S., Fariduddin, Q., Ali, B. & Ahmad, A. Effect of salicylic acid on growth and enzyme activities of wheat seedlings. Acta Agro. Hung. 53, 433–437 (2005).
Shakirova, F. M., Sakhabutdinova, A. R., Bezrukova, M. V., Fatkhutdinova, R. A. & Fatkhutdinova, D. R. Changes in the hormonal status of wheat seedlings induced by salicylic acid and salinity. Plant Sci. 164, 317–322 (2003).
Singh, B. & Usha, K. Salicylic acid induced physiological and biochemical changes in wheat seedlings under water stress. Plant Growth Regul. 39, 137–141 (2003).
Dolatabadian, A., Modarres Sanavy, S. A. M. & Sharifi, M. Effect of salicylic acid and salt on wheat seed germination. Acta Agri. Sca. Sec. B-Soil Plant Sci. 59, 456–464 (2009).
Khodary, S. E. Effect of salicylic acid on the growth, photosynthesis and carbohydrate metabolism in salt-stressed maize plants. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 6, 5–8 (2004).
Jadhav, S. & Bhamburdekar, S. Effect of salicylic acid on germination performance in groundnut. Int. J. Appl. Biol. Pharm. Technol. 2, 224–227 (2011).
Szepesi, A. et al. Role of salicylic acid pre-treatment on the acclimation of tomato plants to salt-and osmotic stress. Acta Biol. Szeg. 49, 123–125 (2005).
Martin-Mex, R., Villanueva-Couoh, E., Herrera-Campos, T. & Larqué-Saavedra, A. Positive effect of salicylates on the flowering of African violet. Sci. Hort. 103, 499–502 (2005).
McCue, P. et al. A model for enhanced pea seedling vigour following low pH and salicylic acid treatments. Proc. Biochem. 35, 603–613 (2000).
Almeida, A. S. et al. Physiological performance of wheat and barley seeds treated with bioactivator. Am. J. Exp. Agri 2, 90 (2012).
Wang, W. et al. Pre-sowing seed treatments in direct-seeded early rice: consequences for emergence, seedling growth and associated metabolic events under chilling stress. Sci. Rep. 6 (2016).
Gutiérrez-Coronado, M. A., Trejo-López, C. & Larqué-Saavedra, A. Effects of salicylic acid on the growth of roots and shoots in soybean. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 36, 563–565 (1998).
Sandoval-Yapiz, M. Reguladores de crecimiento XXIII: efecto del acido salicilico en la biomasa del cempazuchitl (Tagetes erecta), Tesis de Licenciatura Instituto Tecnologico Agropecuario, Conkal, Yucatan, Mexico (2004).
Martin-Mex, R. & Larqué-Saavedra, A. In 28th Annual Meeting Plant Growth Regulation Society of America, Miami Beach Florida, USA pp. 97–99 (2001).
Larqué-Saavedra, A. & Martin-Mex, R. In Salicylic Acid: A Plant Hormone. 15–23 (Springer, 2007).
Gunes, A. et al. Salicylic acid induced changes on some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress and mineral nutrition in maize (Zea mays L.) grown under salinity. J. Plant Physiol. 164, 728–736 (2007).
Yildirim, E., Turan, M. & Guvenc, I. Effect of foliar salicylic acid applications on growth, chlorophyll, and mineral content of cucumber grown under salt stress. J. Plant Nutr. 31, 593–612 (2008).
Shi, Q. & Zhu, Z. Effects of exogenous salicylic acid on manganese toxicity, element contents and antioxidative system in cucumber. Environ. Exp. Botany 63, 317–326 (2008).
Karlidag, H., Yildirim, E. & Turan, M. Salicylic acid ameliorates the adverse effect of salt stress on strawberry. Sci. Agri. 66, 180–187 (2009).
Stout, M. J., Thaler, J. S. & Thomma, B. P. Plant-mediated interactions between pathogenic microorganisms and herbivorous arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 51, 663–689 (2006).
Gaffney, T. et al. Requirement of salicylic acid for the induction of systemic acquired resistance. Science 261, 754–754 (1993).
Delaney, T. P., Uknes, S., Vernooij, B. & Friedrich, L. A central role of salicylic acid in plant disease resistance. Science 266, 1247 (1994).
Vallélian-Bindschedler, L., Métraux, J.-P. & Schweizer, P. Salicylic acid accumulation in barley is pathogen specific but not required for defense-gene activation. Mol. Plant-Microbe Inter. 11, 702–705 (1998).
Chern, M., Fitzgerald, H. A., Canlas, P. E., Navarre, D. A. & Ronald, P. C. Overexpression of a rice NPR1 homolog leads to constitutive activation of defense response and hypersensitivity to light. Mol. Plant-Microbe Inter. 18, 511–520 (2005).
Chern, M. S. et al. Evidence for a disease‐resistance pathway in rice similar to the NPR1‐mediated signaling pathway in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 27, 101–113 (2001).
Yuan, Y. et al. Functional analysis of rice NPR1‐like genes reveals that OsNPR1/NH1 is the rice orthologue conferring disease resistance with enhanced herbivore susceptibility. Plant Biotechnol. J. 5, 313–324 (2007).
Acknowledgements
Authors would thank authority of Sri Parasakthi College for Women and Sri Paramakalyani Centre for Environmental Sciences for providing facility to conduct the experiments. Authors would grateful to Dr.W.B. Hunter for his comments over the first draft of the manuscript. We thank. Prof. R.K. Murali Baskaran, Prof. S. Suresh and Dr. Ilanchezhian for generously providing seeds of rice varieties.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.K., M.M.K. and S.S.-N. designed the experiments; K.K. planted the rice and conducted the experiments, inoculated BB and sampled; K.K. carried out experiments and M.M.K. analyzed experimental results. K.K. interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript; S.S.-N. revised and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Kalaivani, K., Kalaiselvi, M. & Senthil-Nathan, S. Effect of methyl salicylate (MeSA), an elicitor on growth, physiology and pathology of resistant and susceptible rice varieties. Sci Rep 6, 34498 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34498
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep34498
This article is cited by
-
Physiological and biochemical alterations in Vigna rdiate L. triggered by sesame derived elicitors as defense mechanism against Rhizoctonia and Macrophomina infestation
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Role of Jasmonic and Salicylic Acid on Enzymatic Changes in the Root of Two Alyssum inflatum Náyr. Populations Exposed to Nickel Toxicity
Journal of Plant Growth Regulation (2023)
-
Seed priming: an emerging tool towards sustainable agriculture
Plant Growth Regulation (2022)
-
Effects of ultraviolet light and methyl salicylate on some phenological and agronomic and morphological characteristics of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology (2022)
-
Morpho-physiological alterations and resistance to Tetranychus urticae in strawberries plants treated with salicylic acid
Phytoparasitica (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.