Abstract
Endemism is an important concept in biogeography and biodiversity conservation. China is one of the richest countries in biodiversity, with very high levels of plant endemism. In this study, we analysed the distribution patterns of diversity, the degree of differentiation and the endemicity of Chinese endemic seed plants using the floristic unit as a basic spatial analysis unit and 11 indices. The analysis was based on distribution data of 24,951 native seed plant species (excluding subspecies and varieties) and 12,980 Chinese endemic seed plant species, which were sourced from both specimen records and published references. The distribution patterns of Chinese endemic flora were generally consistent but disproportionate across China for diversity, degree of differentiation and endemicity. The South Hengduan Mountains Subregion had the highest values for all indices. At the regional level, both the Hengduan Mountains and the Central China regions were highest in diversity and degrees of differentiation. However, both the rate of local endemic to native species and the rate of local to Chinese endemic species were highest in the Taiwan Region and the South Taiwan Region. The Hengduan Mountains Region and the Central China Region are two key conservation priority areas for Chinese endemic seed plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The Chinese flora has long attracted the attention of botanists and biogeographers1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. China is one of the richest countries in terms of plant biodiversity9,10. The total number of vascular plant species in China is 31362 (Wu et al.11). The Chinese flora is also highly endemic12,13,14; a previous study found that endemic species account for 52.1% of all seed plant species8. China is also the only country in the world that supports vegetational continuity from tropical, to subtropical, temperate and boreal forests2,15. This continuous latitudinal gradient of forest vegetation, in combination with the many mountain ranges in China, presumably reduced rates of extinction during glaciations and increased rates of evolution and speciation for vascular plants2. China has attracted the attention of ecologists and conservationists because of the extraordinary richness of its flora16,17,18,19,20 and because it is among the countries with the highest numbers of threatened species in the world (Jenkins et al.21). Of the World Wildlife Fund’s Global 200 most Critical and Endangered Ecoregions, 17 are located in or intersect with China (Olson & Dinerstein22). Furthermore, of the 34 global biodiversity hotspots identified by Conservation International (Mittermeier et al.23), four either intersect with or are located within China. In total, 10 hotspot ecoregions24, 20 hotspots of endemic woody seed plant species20 and 8 hotspots of threatened plant species25 have been identified in China. By the end of 2014, China had established 2729 nature reserves26, but many were established opportunistically and do not fully represent and protect biodiversity priority areas27 or threatened plants28.
The flora in China is extremely rich and complex in species composition and distribution patterns. Thus, the regionalization of Chinese flora is also difficult and challenging. Wu was the first researcher to publish a comprehensive regionalization of Chinese flora based on pioneering works that had been published over decades. He classified Chinese flora into 2 kingdoms, 7 subkingdoms and 22 regions29. Subsequently, the regionalization of Chinese flora was updated and refined into 4 kingdoms, 7 subkingdoms, 24 regions and 49 subregions in total1.
As described previously, many studies of biodiversity conservation have been conducted across China. However, they primarily used an administrative unit, particularly at the provincial level, as the spatial unit for analysis rather than a natural geographic or floristic unit. It is better to identify conservation priority areas on the basis of a natural geographic or floristic unit because such classifications substantially reduce the influence of and definition by human factors. Therefore, using the floristic unit as the basic unit of spatial analysis, we examined the distribution patterns, diversification and degrees of differentiation of Chinese endemic seed plants and identified conservation priority areas across the country for conservation planning and future effective conservation actions.
Materials and Methods
Species data
Based on a previously published list of Chinese endemic seed plant species16, we compiled a data set of species distributions of Chinese endemic seed plants at the county level. The main sources used to compile the distribution dataset were as follows: (a) Flora of China11 and Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae30; (b) local flora, plant checklists and relevant monographs; (c) journal papers on plant taxonomy and distribution; and (d) specimens. Our research sources included 1044 flora, monographs, reports and theses; 516 papers; and 37 herbaria through the end of 2012. The references and herbaria are listed in Appendix A. The distribution data were extracted from the source data and compiled and unified to county level. Then, a geographic distribution database of Chinese endemic seed plant species was established. We compiled 789,004 records of 24,951 native seed plant species (excluding subspecies and varieties) with distribution information at the county level. Of these species, 12,980 (Appendix B) are endemic to China.
Floristic regions of China
We digitized the map of floristic regions of China1 using ArcGIS 9.331. The floristic regions of China were composed of 4 kingdoms, 7 subkingdoms, 24 regions and 49 subregions (Table 1 and Fig. 1). There are 9 regions without subregions. We used the floristic subregion as the basic unit for spatial analysis in this study. Thus, 58 spatial floristic units were examined (i.e., 49 subregions and 9 regions) (Table 1 and Fig. 1). Two of the 58 units — the Islands of East Guangdong along sea Subregion (IVG21b) and the Islands of South China Sea Subregion (IVG21e) — comprise multiple islands. We were unable to generate a checklist of plant species for these two units because high-precision species distribution data for them were not available. Therefore, 56 spatial floristic units were generated. We extracted centroids (latitude and longitude coordinates) for all counties using Data Management Tools in ArcGIS. These centroids were incorporated into 56 floristic units with Analysis Tools and records of the floristic units for each species were then obtained. Distribution information regarding the presence or absence of each species was documented for each floristic unit.
Data analysis
Measurement of species diversity was based on species richness, i.e., the number of species in each spatial unit32. Family diversity and genus diversity were calculated using family richness and genus richness, respectively, i.e., the number of families and genera in each spatial unit. In addition, the local endemic species (NLES) for each floristic unit were counted according to their distributions.
The degrees of differentiation among endemic flora were represented by differentiation indices, which included a species differentiation index (Ds)33, a genus differentiation index (Dg)33 and a species–family differentiation index (Dsf)34. The functions of the three indices are shown in Equations (1, 2, 3).
where Ds, Dg and Dsf are the species differentiation index, genus differentiation index and species–family differentiation index for a floristic unit, respectively and Ns is the number of species endemic in China in a floristic unit, Ng is the number of genera of endemic flora in China in a floristic unit and Nf is the number of families of endemic flora in China in a floristic unit.
Biodiversity conservation is closely associated with species distribution and biogeography. Generally, species that are confined to a limited area have an increased risk of extinction. Here, we calculated the weighted endemism35,36 for each floristic unit. The calculation of weighted endemism is shown in Equation (4).
where n is the number of species in a focal floristic unit and Wi is the weight of species i, which is the inverse of its range (i.e., the number of floristic units in which species i occurs).
Proportions of endemism were calculated to compare the distribution patterns of endemic flora in China. These proportions included the rate of Chinese endemic to native species (RCENS), the rate of local endemic to native species (RLENS) and the rate of local to Chinese endemic species (RLCES).
To summarize, the 11 indices were as follow: the number of species (Ns), the number of genera (Ng), the number of families (Nf), the number of local endemic species (NLES), the degree of species differentiation (Ds), the degree of genus differentiation (Dg), the degree of species–family differentiation (Dsf), weighted endemism (WE), the rate of Chinese endemic to native species (RCENS), the rate of local endemic to native species (RLENS) and the rate of local to Chinese endemic species (RLCES). These 11 indices were standardized by dividing their maxima and then summed to produce a total value. All floristic units were ranked according to their total value and conservation priority areas for Chinese endemic seed plants were identified according to each unit’s rank. The spatial floristic unit was used to prioritize conservation areas and the units with the highest total values were the tip-ranked areas because higher values were determined by greater endemic species richness and the degree of differentiation and endemism. In this study, the top eight floristic units were designated conservation priority areas.
Correlations between the values of indices and the geographic distance from focal floristic units to the centre floristic unit with the highest value for each index were identified using the Mantel test37. All calculations were carried out using the R statistical software package, version 3.2.238. All geographic distribution patterns of Chinese endemic flora were mapped using ArcGIS 9.3 software.
Results
Composition and distribution of Chinese endemic seed plant species
Families and genera of Chinese endemic seed plant species were unevenly distributed across the country. At the family level, the South Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14b) and the Central Yunnan Plateau Subregion (IIIE13a) contained the most families (Table 2 and Fig. 2a). These two subregions were followed by the Southeast Yunnan Subregion (IIIE13b), the Guizhou-Guangxi Border Subregion (IIID12a) and the Guizhou Plateau Subregion (IIIE13b). The South Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14b) and the Central Yunnan Plateau Subregion (IIIE13a) were the richest in genera of Chinese endemic seed plant species, with 813 and 785 genera, respectively (Table 2). These subregions were followed by the Guizhou Plateau Subregion (IIID10d), the Yunnan-Myanmar-Thailand Border Region (IVG23), the Sanjiang Valley Subregion (IIIE14a), the Guizhou-Guangxi Border Subregion (IIID12a), the Southeast Yunnan Subregion (IIIE13b), the Guangdong-Guangxi Mountain Subregion (IIID11d), the Sichuan-Hubei-Hunan Border Subregion (IIID10c) and the Beibu Gulf Region (IVG22) (Table 2 and Fig. 2b).
Chinese endemic seed plant species were also unevenly distributed across the country. The South Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14b) was the richest, with 5177 species of Chinese endemic seed plants, which was followed by the Central Yunnan Plateau Subregion (IIIE13a), with 3688 species (Table 2). The Pamir-Karakoram-Kunlun Subregion was the least rich in Chinese endemic species richness and has only 64 species (Table 2). At the region level, the distribution of Chinese endemic seed plants was concentrated mainly in the Hengduan Mountains Region (IIIE14), followed by the Yunnan Plateau Region (IIIE13), the Yunnan-Guizhou-Guangxi Border Region (IIID12), the Lingnan Mountains Region (IIID11), the Central China Region (IIID10), the Yunnan-Myanmar-Thailand Border Region (IVG23) and the Beibu Gulf Region (IVG22) (Fig. 2c).
The distribution patterns of Chinese endemic flora at family, genus and species levels across the country were generally consistent (Fig. 2a–c). The patterns were significantly correlated (P < 0.001) and all correlation coefficients were greater than 0.80. The South Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14b) and the Central Yunnan Plateau Subregion (IIIE13a), which bordered each other, were centres of Chinese endemic flora because they had the highest numbers of endemic taxa. The number of families, genera and species of Chinese endemic seed flora decreased with increasing distance from focal floristic units to the centre floristic unit with the highest value for each index (Fig. 2a–c), but the number of families and genera decreased significantly (P < 0.05).
Species differentiation
The degree of differentiation among endemic seed plant species was unevenly distributed across China (Fig. 2d–f). The highest species differentiation was in the South Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14b), with a value of 6.37, followed by the North Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14c), with a value of 5.56 (Table 2). The lowest degree of species differentiation was in the Tacheng and Yili Subregion, with a value of 1.24 (Table 2). The genus differentiation among Chinese endemic seed plant species was the highest (5.57) in the South Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14b) and the lowest (1.86) in the South Taiwan Region (IVG20). The pattern for the species–family differentiation index was similar to that observed for genus differentiation (Table 2).
Local endemic species and their endemicity
The spatial distribution patterns of Chinese endemic plant species, local endemic species and weighted endemism were significantly correlated (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3a–c) and all correlation coefficients were greater than 0.75. The South Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14b) was the richest in local endemic species, with a value of 429. The Yunnan-Myanmar-Thailand Border Subregion ranked second, with 194 local endemic species.
The endemic rates were also unevenly distributed across the country (Fig. 3d–f). The rate of Chinese endemic to native plant species (RCENS) was highest in the South Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14b) and the North Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14c). Both the rate of local endemic to native species (RLENS) and the rate of local to Chinese endemic species (RLCES) were the highest in the Taiwan Region (VG19) and the South Taiwan Region (IVG20). The rate of local to Chinese endemic species (RLCES) was also very high in the Altai Region (IA2) and the Pamir-Karakoram-Kunlun Subregion (IIIF17c), followed by the South Taiwan Region (IVG20).
Priority areas of floristic regions for Chinese endemic seed plant species
The South Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14b), the Central Yunnan Plateau Subregion (IIIE13a), the Sanjiang Valley Subregion (IIIE14a) and the North Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14c) had the highest total values of all floristic units (Fig. 4). These subregions, with the exception of the Central Yunnan Plateau Subregion (IIIE13a), are in the geographic space of the Hengduan Mountains Region (Table 1). The subregions that followed those with the highest values were the Guizhou Plateau Subregion (IIID10d), the Sichuan-Hubei-Hunan Border Subregion (IIID10c), the Qinling-Bashan Subregion (IIID10a) and the Taohe-Minshan Subregion (IIIE14d). Of these regions, the first three are in the Central China Region (Table 1) and the Taohe-Minshan Subregion is also in the Hengduan Mountains Region (Table 1).
Discussion
Species differentiation
The degree of species differentiation among Chinese endemic seed plants was unevenly distributed across the country. Although the degree of differentiation was not high in many parts of China, it was particularly high in the Hengduan Mountains12, which indicated that the Hengduan Mountains are the centre of differentiation for Chinese endemic seed plants39. This result is consistent with the hypothesis that Southwest China is the differentiation centre of the Chinese flora1,2,7. The Hengduan Mountains are the core part of Southwest China in terms of biological diversity and differentiation2. Therefore, the Hengduan Mountains are the centre of biological diversity and differentiation in China.
Endemicity
The rate of Chinese endemic to native plant species was highest in the South Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14b), followed by the North Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14c). Based on this result, endemicity of flora in the Hengduan Mountains is very high across China. However, the South Hengduan Mountains Subregion and the North Hengduan Mountains Subregion differ in endemicity. The terrain of China from west to east forms a flight of three steps, commonly called the “Geomorphological Three Steps”. The First Step mainly encompasses the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, north to the Kunlun, Aerhchin and Qilian mountains and east to Min, Qionglai, Daxue and Hengduan mountains. The Second Step lies between the Hengduan Mountains to the west and the Daxing’anling, Taihang, Funiu and Xuefeng mountains to the east, primarily including the Inner Mongolian Plateau, Loess Plateau, Qinling Mountains, Sichuan Basin and Yun-Gui Plateau. The Third Step covers the entire area east from the Second Step and includes the Northeast China Plain, North China Plain, Middle-lower Yangtze Plain, Jiangnan hills, Nanling Mountains, Guangdong and Guangxi hills, Zhejiang and Fujian hills as well as Taiwan and Hainan20. The floristic endemicity was higher in the south Hengduan Mountains than that in the North Hengduan Mountains Subregion, most likely because the Hengduan Mountains are topographically located along the border of the Second Step and the Third Step in China and the warm, moist airflows in summer occur primarily in the South Hengduan Mountains Subregion and have only a limited influence if they arrive in the North Hengduan Mountains Subregion. By contrast, the North Hengduan Mountains Subregion is often influenced by dry and cold airflows. The altitude range is mainly between 2000 and 3000 m in the South Hengduan Mountains Subregion, which is the altitude characterized by a rapid increase in the rate of Chinese endemic seed plants8.
The rate of local endemic to native plant species was highest in the Taiwan Region (IVG19) and the South Taiwan Region (IVG20), which indicates that the flora of Taiwan is distinctive. The rate of local to national endemic plant species was the highest in the Taiwan Region (IVG19), the South Taiwan Region (IVG20), the Altai Region (IA2) and the Pamir-Karakoram-Kunlun Subregion (III17c). This result shows that the island of Taiwan, the Altai Region (IA2) and the Pamir-Karakoram-Kunlun Subregion (III17c) have different flora that might be influenced by trans-boundary flora from neighbouring countries.
Conservation priority areas
The four top conservation priority areas were identified; the South Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14b), the Central Yunnan Plateau Subregion (IIIE13a), the Sanjiang Valley Subregion (IIIE14a) and the North Hengduan Mountains Subregion (IIIE14c). Most of these subregions are in the geographical terrain of the Hengduan Mountains. The Hengduan Mountains are rich in mountainous flora and are thus a key area for studies of the relationships among Laurasian, Gondwanian and Tethyan flora40. Vegetation with both horizontal and vertical replacement is markedly dominant in the Hengduan Mountains41,42. Moreover, new and old endemic plant species coexist, although the new endemic species are dominant in this region1,3. The flora of this region is divided into three geographical elements based on ancient geographical environments43: Boreal, Tethys and Gondwana. Studies of the trade-offs among these geographical elements over space and time are beneficial in clarifying the relationships between the development of flora and the movements of tectonic plates1. Conservation International listed the montane areas of Southwest China as one of the 34 global biodiversity hotspots23.
Three other top conservation priority areas were identified; the Guizhou Plateau Subregion (IIID10d), the Sichuan-Hubei-Hunan Border Subregion (IIID10c) and the Qinling-Bashan Subregion (IIID10a). These three subregions are in the Central China Region. The flora of this region comprises direct and nearly intact descendants of a Tertiary ancient flora1 for several reasons. First, the Ancient Central China region did not suffer transgression after Indosinian movement in the Triassic period44. Second, montane refuges that were widespread during the Pleistocene glacial period were less affected in this region. In the glacial periods throughout the glacial-interglacial cycles, some plants migrated between the north and south and between low and high elevations near the Hengduan Mountains44,45. Third, this region is completely surrounded by mountains and has an enclosed terrain that is complex and varied44. All of these factors are closely related to the preservation of old endemic species and to the differentiation of new endemic species1,12,46. Therefore, we suggest that more attention should be paid to this region for its protection. In our study, the conservation priority areas identified for Chinese endemic seed plants were highly consistent with the key flora of China that were identified in previous studies1. In addition, in this study, conservation priority areas were identified for the first time by using a floristic unit as the basic unit of spatial analysis across China. With this approach, the artificial impact of the unit of spatial analysis on the distribution patterns of species was substantially weakened because the bounded floristic subregion depended much more on natural factors than on human factors. Consequently, determination of conservation priority areas for Chinese endemic seed plants of the China flora is more credible when a floristic unit is the basic unit for spatial analysis.
Conclusion
The diversity and degrees of differentiation among Chinese endemic seed plants are unevenly distributed across the country. Both the Hengduan Mountains and Central China regions are diversity centres that also have the highest degrees of differentiation. Moreover, the Hengduan Mountains Region and the Central China Region are two key conservation priority areas for Chinese endemic seed plants based on diversity, degrees of differentiation and endemicity. In addition, the Taiwan Region, the Altai Region and the Pamir-Karakoram-Kunlun Subregion have unique endemic flora and greater attention should be paid to the flora of these regions or subregions in future conservation planning and actions.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Huang, J. et al. Diversity distribution patterns of Chinese endemic seed plant species and their implications for conservation planning. Sci. Rep. 6, 33913; doi: 10.1038/srep33913 (2016).
References
Wu, Z., Sun, H., Zhou, Z., Li, D. & Peng, H. Floristics of Seed Plants from China. (Science Press, 2011).
Axelrod, D. I., Al-Shehbaz, I. & Raven, P. H. History of the modern flora of China. in Floristic Characteristics and Diversity of East Asian Plants (eds Aoluo, Zhang & Sugong, Wu ) 43–55 (China Higher Education Press, 1996).
Lopez-Pujol, J., Zhang, F., Sun, H., Ying, T. & Ge, S. Centres of plant endemism in China: places for survival or for speciation? J. Biogeogr. 38, 1267–1280 (2011).
Qiu, Y., Fu, C. & Comes, H. P. Plant molecular phylogeography in China and adjacent regions: Tracing the genetic imprints of Quaternary climate and environmental change in the world’s most diverse temperate flora. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 59, 225–244 (2011).
Qian, H., Field, R., Zhang, J., Zhang, J. & Chen, S. Phylogenetic structure and ecological and evolutionary determinants of species richness for angiosperm trees in forest communities in China. J. Biogeogr. 43, 603–615, doi: 10.1111/jbi.12639 (2016).
Feng, G., Mao, L., Sandel, B., Swenson, N. G. & Svenning, J.-C. High plant endemism in China is partially linked to reduced glacial-interglacial climate change. J. Biogeogr. 43, 145–154, doi: 10.1111/jbi.12613 (2016).
Raven, P. H. & Axelrod, D. I. Angiosperm biogeography and past continental movements. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 61, 539–673 (1974).
Huang, J., Chen, J, Ying, J. & Ma, K. Features and distribution patterns of Chinese endemic seed plant species. J. Syst. Evol. 49, 81–94 (2011).
McNeely, J. A., Miller, K. R., Reid, W. V., Mittermeier, R. A. & Werner, T. B. Conserving the World’s Biological Diversity (IUCN, WRI, WWF, World Bank, 1990).
Mittermeier, R. A., Gil, P. R. & Mittermeier, C. G. Megadiversity Earth’s Biologically Wealthiest Nations (Conservation International (CI), 1997).
Wu, Z., Raven, P. H. & Hong, D. Flora of China. (Science Press and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, 1994–2012).
Editoral Committee of China’s Physical Geography. China’s Physical Geography: Phytogeography Vol. 1 (Science Press, 1983).
Fu, L., Feng, Z., Zhuang, J. & Ying, J. Species diversity, in Biodiversity in China: Status and Conservation Strategy (ed Lingzhi Chen) 31–99 (Science Press, 1993).
Ying, J. Species diversity and distribution pattern of seed plants in China. Biodiversity Science 9, 393–398 (2001).
Qian, H. et al. Large-scale phytogeographical patterns in East Asia in relation to latitudinal and climatic gradients. J. Biogeogr. 30, 129–141 (2003).
Huang, J., Ma, K. & Chen, B. Diversity and Geigraphic Distribution of Endemic Species of Seed Plants in China (China Higher Education Press, 2014).
Du, Y. et al. Phylogenetic constraints and trait correlates of flowering phenology in the angiosperm flora of China. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 24, 928–938, doi: 10.1111/geb.12303 (2015).
Wang, Z., Rahbek, C. & Fang, J. Effects of geographical extent on the determinants of woody plant diversity. Ecography 35, 1124–1133, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07786.x (2012).
Wang, Z., Fang, J., Tang, Z. & Shi, L. Geographical patterns in the beta diversity of China’s woody plants: the influence of space, environment and range size. Ecography 35, 1092–1102, doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.06988.x (2012).
Huang, J. et al. Identifying hotspots of endemic woody seed plant diversity in China. Divers. Distrib. 18, 673–688, doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00845.x (2012).
Jenkins, M., Green, R. E. & Madden, J. The challenge of measuring global change in wild nature: Are things getting better or worse? Conserv. Biol. 17, 20–23 (2003).
Olson, D. M. & Dinerstein, E. The global 200: A representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv. Biol. 12, 502–515 (1998).
Mittermeier, R. A. et al. Hotspots Revisited (The University of Chicago Press, 2005).
Tang, Z., Wang, Z., Zheng, C. & Fang, J. Biodiversity in China’s mountains. Front. Ecol. Environ. 4, 347–352, doi: 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)004[0347:BICM]2.0.CO;2 (2006).
Zhang, Y. & Ma, K. Geographic distribution patterns and status assessment of threatened plants in China. Biodivers. Conserv. 17, 1783–1798, doi: 10.1007/s10531-008-9384-6 (2008).
Ministry of Environment Protection the People’s Republic of China. The 2014 Report on the State of Environment in China (Beijing, 2015).
Wu, R. et al. Effectiveness of China’s nature reserves in representing ecological diversity. Front. Ecol. Environ. 9, 383–389, doi: 10.1890/100093 (2011).
Zhang, Z., He, J., Li, J. & Tang, Z. Distribution and conservation of threatened plants in China. Biol. Conserv. 192, 454–460, doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.10.019 (2015).
Wu, Z. The regionalization of Chinese flora. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 1, 1–22 (1979).
Editorial Committee of Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae (Science Press, 1959–2004).
ESRI. ArcGIS 9.3 . ESRI, Redlands, CA, USA; URL http://www.esri.com (2008).
Zhang, J. Numerical Ecology. (Science Press, 1995).
Zhou, L. & Ma, Y. Distribution patterns of rodent diversity in arid regions of West China. Biodiversity Science 10, 41–48 (2002).
Cao, W. Study on diversity and patterns of vascular plants in Changbaishan floristic region Ph. D thesis, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, (2004).
Crisp, M. D., Laffan, S., Linder, H. P. & Monro, A. Endemism in the Australian flora. J. Biogeogr. 28, 183–198 (2001).
Williams, P. H. & Humphries, C. J. Biodiversity, taxonomic relatedness and endemism in conservation. In Systematics and Conservation Evaluation (eds Forey, P. L., Humphries, C. J. & Vane-Wright, R. I. ) 269–287 (Clarendon Press, 1994).
Mantel, N. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27, 209–220 (1967).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL http://www.R-project.org. (2015).
Ying, J. & Zhang, Y. The Endemic Genera of Seed Plants of China. (Science Press, 1994).
Wu, Z. & Wu, S. A proposal for a new floristic kingdom (realm) – the E. Asiatic Kingdom, its delineation and characteristics, in Floristic Characteristics and Diversity of East Asian Plants (eds Aoluo, Zhang & Sugong, Wu ) 3–42 (China Higher Education Press, 1996).
Editorial Committee of China’s physical geography. China’s Physical Geography. Physiognomy. (Science Press, 1980).
Wu, Z. Vegetation of China. (Science Press, 1980).
Yin, H. The Palaeobiogeography of China. (Clarendon Press, 1994).
Latham, R. E. & Ricklefs, R. E. Continental comparisons of temperate-zone tree species diversity, in Species Diversity in Ecological Communities: Historical and Geographical Perspectives (eds Ricklefs, R. E. & Schluter, D. ) 294–314 (University of Chicago Press, 1993).
Hsu, J. Changes of the palaeoenvironment of Southern East Asia since the Late Tertiary. Centre of Asian Studies, the University of Hong Kong 419–425 (1984).
Ying, J. & Chen, M. Plant Geography of China. (Shanghai Science & Technology Press, 2011).
Acknowledgements
We are particularly grateful to the associate editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on the manuscript. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41471048), the National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant of the Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAFYBB2014MA005) and the National Nonprofit Institute Research Grant of the Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry (CAFIFEEP2015B02).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Jihong Huang, Jianhua Huang and K.M. designed the study. Jihong collected data. Jihong Huang and Jianhua Huang carried out the data analysis and wrote the manuscript. Jihong Huang, Jianhua Huang, K.M. and X.L. reviewed the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, J., Huang, J., Lu, X. et al. Diversity distribution patterns of Chinese endemic seed plant species and their implications for conservation planning. Sci Rep 6, 33913 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33913
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33913
This article is cited by
-
Fruiting character variability in wild individuals of Malania oleifera, a highly valued endemic species
Scientific Reports (2021)
-
Potential distributions of seven sympatric sclerophyllous oak species in Southwest China depend on climatic, non-climatic, and independent spatial drivers
Annals of Forest Science (2021)
-
The phenology of Ligustrum lucidum (Oleaceae): climatic niche conservatism as an important driver of species invasion in Araucaria forest
Biological Invasions (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.