Article | Open Access | Published:

Palladium-catalyzed direct arylation and cyclization of o-iodobiaryls to a library of tetraphenylenes

Scientific Reports volume 6, Article number: 33131 (2016) | Download Citation

Abstract

Aryl–aryl bond formation constitutes one of the most important subjects in organic synthesis. The recent developments in direct arylation reactions forming aryl–aryl bond have emerged as very attractive alternatives to traditional cross-coupling reactions. Here, we describe a general palladium-catalyzed direct arylation and cyclization of o-iodobiaryls to build a library of tetraphenylenes. This transformation represents one of the very few examples of C-H activation process that involves simultaneous formation of two aryl–aryl bonds. Oxygen plays a vital role by ensuring high reactivity, with air as the promoter furnished the best results. We anticipate this ligand-free and aerobic catalytic system will simplify the synthesis of tetraphenylenes as many of the reported methods involve use of preformed organometallic reagents and will lead to the discovery of highly efficient new direct arylation process.

Introduction

Over the past decade, a number of methods have been developed for the synthesis of biaryl compounds1. The classical method involves the reaction of organometallic nucleophiles with a wide range of organo(pseudo)halides in presence of transition-metal catalysis2. Synthesis of such compounds without the aid of organometallics have drawn tremendous attention to the chemist. Substitution of the preactivated species with a simple arene as a nucleophile has become the most widely used mode of attack (Fig. 1, a-1)3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. The most atom economic and attractive alternative is the dehydrogenative coupling of two aryl C–H bonds, neither of which requires preactivation of substrates (Fig. 1, a-2)14,15,16,17,18. Most recently, Weix et al. also developed reductive coupling of aryl bromides with aryl triflates via a multimetallic catalyzed process (Fig. 1, a-3)19. As a result of significant progress in biaryl synthesis, these green and efficient protocols have been applied extensively, particularly in construction and arylation of π-conjugated molecules with high selectivity20.

Figure 1: The attempted synthesis of tetraphenylene inspired from modern aryl-aryl bond construction.
Figure 1

(a) Transition-metal-catalyzed coupling reactions without the aid of organometallic reagents. (b) Known progress toward tetraphenylene synthesis. (c) New route to tetraphenylene construction.

Flexible π-conjugated skeletons are the focus of considerable interest due to their dynamic molecular motions that can exhibit interesting molecule-based functions21,22,23. Tetraphenylene is one of the classical flexible π-conjugated molecules, in which four benzene rings are ortho-annelated to form an eight-membered ring at the center of the molecule (Fig. 1b)24. This unique structure characterizes tetraphenylene and their derivatives to be employed as liquid crystals25, molecular devices26, blue organic light-emitting diodes27, chiral ligands28,29 and key building blocks30. Traditional methods involving homocoupling of Grignard, zinc or lithium reagents derived from 2,2′-dihalobiaryls in presence of stoichiometric CuCl or NiCl2 provides the tetraphenylenes in low to moderate yields31,32. Additionally, dimerization of diphenylene33, [2 + 2 + 2] cycloaddition34 and Ullmann coupling35,36 reactions were optional methods to synthesize the tetraphenylene frameworks. In spite of these highly important pioneering studies, approaches based on C–H activation process in a general manner via transition-metal catalysis have remained underdeveloped. As part of our continuous effort on developing direct arylation procedure37,38, we decided to tackle a new synthetic route to simplify the synthesis of the eight-membered π-conjugated compounds. Here we have reported the first example of dual aryl-aryl bond formation to build a series of tetraphenylenes by a palladium-catalyzed direct arylation and cyclization process (Fig. 1c). Notably, a protocol has been developed that enables the use of readily accessible 2-iodobiaryls as the starting materials directly, which previously required the use of 2,2′-dihalobiaryls as the precursors39.

Results and Discussion

Initially we have evaluated the homo-coupling and cyclization of commercially available o-iodobiaryl (1a) (Fig. 2). By employing catalytic Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), 10 mol% of Davephos as the ligand and 2.0 equiv of Cs2CO3 as the base in DMF at 100 °C under argon, we indeed observed trace amount of 2aa in GC-MS and crude 1H NMR (entry 1). Gratifyingly, the yield could be improved up to 40% by switching the base to KHCO3 and NaHCO3 (entry 2–3). Surprisingly, removal of the ligand maintained the similar reactivity and afforded the desired product in 39% yield (entry 4). This result indicated that the ligand might not be a driving force for this transformation. After extensive optimization, we have observed that the reaction atmosphere has an important effect and dioxygen atmosphere could significantly improve the yield (65%, entry 5). Notably, air atmosphere was superior for the process (entry 6)40,41,42. In addition, raising the reaction temperature to 130 °C under air, the desired product 2a was isolated in maximum yield (86%, entry 7). The use of 2-bromo-1,1′-biphenyl (1a’) and [1,1′-biphenyl]-2-yl trifluoromethanesulfonate (1a”) as the substrates provided lower yield of the desired product 2aa (entries 8–9). Investigation with other palladium sources also exhibited inferior results (entries 10−12). Lowering of catalyst loading did not alter efficacy of the process (entry 13). Control experiments revealed that palladium and base were crucial for the transformation (entries 14−15). Finally, a light off experiment verified that the reaction was not promoted via superoxide radical pathway by visible-light irradiation (entry 16).

Figure 2: Reaction optimization.
Figure 2

Reaction conditions: 1a (0.4 mmol), [Pd] (5 mol %), ligand (10 mol %), base (2.4 equiv), Solvent (2 mL), 130 °C, 36 h, in air. *1H NMR yield using CH2Br2 as internal standard. Isolated yield. In duck.

With the optimum conditions in hand, we have extended the scope of this cyclization process (Fig. 3). 2-iodo-4,4′-dimethyl-1,1′-biphenyl (1b) afforded the desired product 2,7,10,15-tetramethyltetraphenylene (2bb, entry 1) in 72% yield. An interesting phenomenon is that 2-iodo-3′,5-dimethyl-1,1′-biphenyl (1c), an isomeric structure of 1b also yield the same product 2bb in 80% yield (Entry 2), due to its D2 symmetry structure. This result also indicated that the C-H activation position occurs at less sterically hindered position. It has been shown for a number of tetraphenylenes with bulky alkyl substituents show special optical, electrochemical and solution-state aggregation behaviour43. In the present investigation, we found that the substrate 1d also worked effectively to provide bulky substituted tetraphenylene 2dd (entry 3). Considering that the multi-methoxy substituted tetraphenylenes have been suggested to be potential applicant in the field of host-guest chemistry, molecular devices and liquid crystal meterials, we have synthesized the substrate 1e and tested. Gratifyingly, the desired product 2ee was obtained in 68% yield (entry 4). Moreover, a very electron-rich N2,N2,N7,N7,N10,N10,N15,N15-octamethyltetraphenylene-2,7,10,15-tetraamine (2ff, entry 5) was isolated in in 65% yield under the reaction condition. Large aromatic conjugated tetraphenylene 2gg (entry 6), possessing special optical properties44 could also be generated from the p-quaterphenyl iodide 1g. Electron-deficient substrate nitro (1h, entry 7) were also compatible for this process, albeit much lower reactivity. In addition, multi-substituted o-iodobiaryl 1i reacted smoothly under the optimal conditions, affording the corresponding octamethyltetraphenylene2ii in good yield (entry 8).

Figure 3: Substrate scope of homo-coupling and cyclization of o-iodobiaryls.
Figure 3

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), NaHCO3 (2.4 equiv), DMF (2 mL), 130 °C, 36 h, in air; The yields shown reflect the average of two isolation experiments.

Differently ring substituted o-iodobiaryls were also tested to generate a novel synthetic entry to the mixed tetraphenylene derivatives in Fig. 4. The coupling of 2-iodo-4′-methoxy-1,1′-biphenyl (1j) under the standard conditions provided the regioisomeric tetraphenylenes 2jj and 3jj (1:1) and were collected in 66% combined yield as they were inseparable. Recrystallization of the mixture afforded 3jj as a single isomer and it was characterized by X-ray crystal structure analysis (Fig. 4a). Subsequently we have carried out coupling of the isomers 1-(2-iodophenyl)naphthalene (1k) and 2-iodo-1-phenylnaphthalene (1k’). Both isomers produced mixed tetraphenylene derivatives with different selectivity (Fig. 4b). The isomers 2kk and 3kk were separated by column chromatography on silica and subsequently each isomer was subjected to recrystallization and finally confirmed via X-ray crystal structure analysis.

Figure 4: Synthesis, isolation and structural characterization of tetraphenylenes via homo-coupling and cyclization of unsymmetrical o-iodobiphenyls.
Figure 4

Reaction conditions: 1 (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), NaHCO3 (2.4 equiv), DMF (2 mL), 130 °C, 36 h, in air.

To deliver structures with greater synthetic value, we sought to develop the cross-coupling of two different o-iodobiaryls (Fig. 5). The 2-iodobiphenyl (1a) was reacted with 1j to synthesize the cross-coupled product, 2-methoxytetraphenylene (2aj) as main product in 46% yield. The byproducts involving the homo-coupling product of 1a and 1j can then be removed easily by column chromatography. Additionally, we have synthesized 2,7-dimethoxytetraphenylene (2ae) and 2,7,10-trimethoxytetraphenylene (2ej) under the same reaction conditions. In combination with homo- and cross-coupling, tetraphenylenes with mono- to tetra-substituted methoxy groups can be generated easily.

Figure 5: Synthesis, isolation and structural characterization of mono-, di-, tri-methoxy substituted tetraphenylenes via cross-coupling and cyclization of o-iodobiphenyls.
Figure 5

Reaction conditions: (a) 1a (0.4 mmol), 1j (0.2 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), NaHCO3 (2.4 equiv), DMF (2 mL), 130 °C, 36 h, in air; (b) 1a (0.4 mmol), 1e (0.2 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), NaHCO3 (2.4 equiv), DMF (2 mL), 130 °C, 36 h, in air; (c) Method A: 1e (0.4 mmol), 1j (0.2 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), NaHCO3 (2.4 equiv), DMF (2 mL), 130 °C, 36 h, in air; Method B: 1e (0.2 mmol), 1j (0.4 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), NaHCO3 (2.4 equiv), DMF (2 mL), 130 °C, 36 h, in air.

A major benefit of this mild cyclization procedure is its amenability to gram-scale applications (Fig. 6). Under the standard conditions, gram-scale synthesis of 2ee without notable erosion of yield proved the practicality of this new method. Synthetic utility of the tetraphenylenes derivatives also increases the importance of these classes of compounds. The demethylation of 2ee with boron tribromide generated tetraphenylene-2,7,10,15-tetraol (3ee, 82%), which can be readily converted into the triflate 4ee in presence of triflic anhydride and pyridine. Both the structures 3ee and 4ee were confirmed by X-ray crystal structure analysis. Using tetraphenylene-2,7,10,15-tetrayl tetrakis(trifluoromethanesulfonate) (4ee), a range of useful tetraphenylene derivatives can be prepared (58, Fig. 6) by palladium catalyst. Methoxycarbonylation of 4ee with methanol in CO atmosphere (1 atm) proceeded smoothly to afford ester 5 in 71% yield. Notably, the free carboxylic acid 6 was also directly accessible in 85% yield in the absence of methanol using the same reaction condition. In addition, palladium-catalyzed Sonogashira and Heck Coupling of 4ee with phenylacetylene and methyl acrylate afforded π-extended tetraphenylenes, 78 respectively in excellent yields. With a wide variety of these functionalized tetraphenylenes in hand, we can predict boldly that they have potential applications in many chemistry and material field such as rapid construction of a class of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs)45.

Figure 6: Gram-scale transformation and diversification of 2ee.
Figure 6

Reaction conditions: 1e (10.3 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), NaHCO3 (2.4 equiv), DMF (50 mL), 130 °C, 36 h, in air; (a) BBr3, DCM, −78 °C to rt; (b) Tf2O, Py, DCM, 0 °C to rt; (c) Pd(OAc)2 (20 mol%), dppf (80 mol%), KOAc (16.0 equiv), DMSO/MeOH, CO (1 atm), 60 °C; (d) Pd(OAc)2 (20 mol%), dppf (80 mol%), KOAc (16.0 equiv), DMSO, CO (1 atm), 60 °C; (e) Pd(OAc)2 (12 mol%), PPh3 (48 mol%), Phenylacetylene (6.0 equiv), K3PO4 (4.8 equiv), DMSO, 80 °C; (f) Pd(OAc)2 (20 mol%), dppp (22 mol%), Methyl acrylate (40.0 equiv), Et3N (8.0 equiv), DMF, 115 °C.

Mechanism

Several transition-metal complexes including Ni46, Pt47 and Pd48 can catalyze the formation of tetraphenylene from biphenylene (9) via C-C bond cleavage. Based on these results, initially we thought that compound 9 might be the key intermediate in this transformation. As shown in Fig. 7, oxidative addition of 1a to a Pd(0) species appears to trigger the reaction to afford the intermediate A, which undergoes activation of a neighboring C-H bond to produce a five membered palladacycle B49. This intermediate has the possibility to undergo reductive elimination forming a biphenylene product 9. According to the literature, the Pd(0) can catalyze the dimerization of 9 via intermediate D50 and E to produce the final product 2aa (pathway A). However, when substrate 9 was subjected to our standard conditions, the corresponding product 2aa was not observed (Fig. 7b, left). This clearly rules out the possibility of the pathway A. The second possible pathway is the oxidative addition of palladacycle B with another substrate molecule to generate C, which can undergo a second C-H activation providing the spiropalladacycle D. Finally, two successive reductive elimination of D generates the product 2aa and the Pd(0) species (pathway B). The third possibility involves reductive eliminationof C to form an intermediate D’ ahead of the second C-H activation. Due to the configuration of D’, the second C-H activation can occur at the remote position to formintermediate E, which the convert to the tetraphenylene 2aa. To find out the best possible intermediate D or D’, we employed compound 10 under the standard conditions and did not observe the desired cyclization product 2aa (Fig. 7b, right). This demonstrates that intermediate D’ can’t undergo remote C-H activation to form the product. Considering these results, we have proposed pathway B to be the most favorable at the current stage. In view of the active role of oxygen molecule in the present transformation, mores studies are required to fully elucidate the reaction pathway. Notably, employing two iodoarene substrates such as o-iodobiphenyl (1a) and 1-iodo-4-methylbenzene (11) in our catalytic system, the cross-coupling and cyclization product 1251 was formed in 13% yield via intermediate C’ along with 65% yield of homo-coupling product 2aa (Fig. 7c). This transformation between two different aryl electrophiles can further prove that the pathway B is reasonable and the discovery of new transformation based on this chemistry is feasible.

Figure 7: Proposed mechanism and the supporting mechanistic studies.
Figure 7

(a) Proposed mechanism. (b) Mechanistic experiments. (c) Cross-coupling reaction. Reaction conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 11 (0.2 mmol), Pd(OAc)2 (5 mol%), NaHCO3 (2.4 equiv), DMF (2 mL), 130 °C, 36 h, in air.

Conclusion

In combination with the known modes for aryl–aryl bond formation, we have now reported an efficient method to build two aryl–aryl bonds simultaneously via direct C–H arylations. This reaction sequence involves rupture of two C-H bonds and two C-I bonds, as well as the formation of an eight-membered ring. This palladium-catalyzed reaction represents as one of the few efficient methods for the formation of flexible π-expanded cyclooctatetraenes. Undoubtedly, this development will help both synthetic and material chemists making this direct arylation as a valuable tool for easy synthesis of various tetraphenylenes. In addition, more than ten structures of tetraphenylene derivatives were observed by X-ray crystal analysis. All these compounds show the saddle-shaped structures wherein the central cyclooctatetraene (COT) parties display the tub conformation (see the supporting information). In the laboratory, more investigations are going on to get insight the reaction mechanism and to apply this type of reactivity profile in other processes.

Methods

General procedure for tetraphenylene synthesis

To a 10 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a magnetic stir bar was charged with Pd(OAc)2 (2.3 mg, 0.01 mol, 5 mol%), o-iodobiaryls (0.40 mmol, 2.0 equiv), NaHCO3 (40 mg, 0.48 mmol, 2.4 equiv) and 2 mL DMF. Then the mixture was stirred at 130 °C under air for 36 h. After cooling to room temperature, the solvent was removed under reduce pressure. The crude product was further purified by column chromatography on silica gel. Full experimental details and characterization of new compounds can be found in the Supplementary Methods.

Data Availability

Crystallographic data for the structural analysis of the compounds have been deposited with the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre, under CCDC no. 1491922 (2aa), 1491929 (2bb), 1491930 (2dd), 1491931 (2ee), 1491932 (2hh), 1491937 (2ii), 1491938 (3jj), 1491939 (2kk), 1491940 (3kk), 1491941 (2ae), 1491942 (3ee), and 1491948 (4ee). These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Zhu, C. et al. Palladium-catalyzed direct arylation and cyclization of o-iodobiaryls to a library of tetraphenylenes. Sci. Rep. 6, 33131; doi: 10.1038/srep33131 (2016).

References

  1. 1.

    , & Metal-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions and More. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim (2014).

  2. 2.

    , & Advances in Transition Metal (Pd, Ni, Fe)-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling Reactions Using Alkyl-organometallics as Reaction Partners. Chem. Rev. 111, 1417–1492 (2011).

  3. 3.

    , & Aryl-aryl bond formation by transition-metal-catalyzed direct arylation. Chem. Rev. 107, 174–238 (2007).

  4. 4.

    , & Recent advances in direct arylation via palladium-catalyzed aromatic C-H activation. Synlett 7, 949–957 (2008).

  5. 5.

    & A meta-selective copper-catalyzed C–H bond arylation. Science 323, 1593–1597 (2009).

  6. 6.

    & Recent advances in aryl–aryl bond formation by direct arylation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 2447–2464 (2009).

  7. 7.

    , & Transition-metal-catalyzed direct arylation of (hetero)arenes by C-H bond cleavage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 9792–9826 (2009).

  8. 8.

    , , , & Transition metal-catalyzed C-H activation reactions: diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 3242–3272 (2009).

  9. 9.

    , , & Weak coordination as a powerful means for developing broadly useful C–H functionalization reactions. Acc. Chem. Res. 45, 788–802 (2012).

  10. 10.

    & Palladium-catalyzed ligand-directed C–H functionalization reactions. Chem. Rev. 110, 1147–1169 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Carboxylate-assisted transition-metal-catalyzed C−H bond functionalizations: mechanism and scope. Chem. Rev. 111, 1315–1345 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Carboxylate-assisted ruthenium-catalyzed alkyne annulations by C–H/Het–H bond functionalizations. Acc. Chem. Res. 47, 281–295 (2014).

  13. 13.

    & C–H bond activation enables the rapid construction and late-stage diversification of functional molecules. Nature Chem. 5, 369–375 (2013).

  14. 14.

    & The catalytic cross-coupling of unactivated arenes. Science 316, 1172–1175 (2007).

  15. 15.

    & Catalytic dehydrogenative cross-coupling: forming carbon-carbon bonds by oxidizing two carbon-hydrogen bonds. Chem. Rev. 111, 1215–1292 (2011).

  16. 16.

    & Palladium-catalyzed selective dehydrogenative cross-couplings of heteroarenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 50, 7479–7481 (2011).

  17. 17.

    , & Cp*Rh-catalyzed C–H activations: versatile dehydrogenative cross-couplings of CSP 2 C–H positions with olefins, alkynes, and arenes. Aldrichimica Acta 45, 31–41 (2012).

  18. 18.

    Cross-dehydrogenative-coupling (CDC): explore C-C bond formations beyond functional group transformations. Acc. Chem. Res. 42, 335–344 (2009).

  19. 19.

    , & Multimetallic catalysed cross-coupling of arylbromides with aryl triflates. Nature 524, 454–457 (2015).

  20. 20.

    , & Synthesis of extended π-systems through C–H activation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 2–18 (2014).

  21. 21.

    , & Corannulene bowl-to-bowl inversion is rapid at room temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 1920–1921 (1992).

  22. 22.

    , , & Structure/energy correlation of bowl depth and inversion barrier in corannulene derivatives:  combined experimental and quantum mechanical analysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 517–525 (2001).

  23. 23.

    , & Synthesis of sumanene, a fullerene fragment. Science 301, 1878–1878 (2003).

  24. 24.

    , & Benzcyclooctatetraenes. Part III. Diphenylene and tetraphenylene. J. Chem. Soc. 326–327 (1943).

  25. 25.

    , , & Anomalous odd–even effects in columnar and smectic phases of discotic tetraphenylenes. ChemPhysChem 10, 1291−1298 (2009).

  26. 26.

    , , & A redox-controlled molecular switch based on the reversible C−C bond formation in octamethoxytetraphenylene. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39, 809−812 (2000).

  27. 27.

    et al. Organic light-emitting diodes from symmetrical and unsymmetrical π-extended tetraoxa[8]circulenes. Chem. Eur. J 16, 13030−13034 (2010).

  28. 28.

    et al. Chiral Rodlike Platinum Complexes, Double Helical Chains, and Potential Asymmetric Hydrogenation Ligand Based on “Linear” Building Blocks: 1,8,9,16-Tetrahydroxytetraphenylene and 1,8,9,16-Tetrakis(diphenylphosphino)tetraphenylene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 9603–9611 (2005).

  29. 29.

    & Asymmetric synthesis of chiral tetraphenylenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 49, 672–674 (2010).

  30. 30.

    , & Synthesis, structural analysis, and properties of [8]circulenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7791–7794 (2013).

  31. 31.

    et al. Synthesis of biphenylenes and tetraphenylenes using copper-catalyzed coupling of arylzinc intermediates. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 159–165 (2001).

  32. 32.

    , , & D2-symmetric dimer of 1,1′-binaphthyl and Its chiral π-conjugated carbodianion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 122, 3351–3357 (2000).

  33. 33.

    , , & The structure of “cyclopropane platinous chloride”. J. Chem. Soc. 738–742 (1961).

  34. 34.

    , , , & Catalytic enantioselective synthesis of chiral tetraphenylenes: consecutive inter- and intramolecular cycloadditions of two triynes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 8066–8069 (2009).

  35. 35.

    , , & Octafunctionalized biphenylenes: molecular precursors for isomeric graphene nanostructures. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 53, 1538–1542 (2014).

  36. 36.

    , & Palladium-catalyzed double Ullmann reaction: an approach towards tetraphenylenes. Asian J. Org. Chem. 5, 74–81 (2016).

  37. 37.

    et al. Iridium(III)-catalyzed direct arylation of C-H bonds with diaryliodonium salts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 12231–12240 (2015).

  38. 38.

    , , , & Palladium-catalyzed C–H arylation of indoles at the C7-position. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 495–498 (2016).

  39. 39.

    & Conversion of 2-iodobiaryls into 2,2′-diiodobiaryls via oxidation-iodination sequences: a versatile route to Ladder-type heterofluorenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54, 8736–8739 (2015).

  40. 40.

    , , & Recent advances in transition-metal catalyzed reactions using molecular oxygen as the oxidant, Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 3381–3430 (2012).

  41. 41.

    , , & Mild metal-catalyzed C–H activation: examples and concepts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, doi: 10.1039/c6cs00075d (2016).

  42. 42.

    , , & Towards mild metal-catalyzed C–H bond activation. Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 4740–4761 (2011).

  43. 43.

    et al. Tetra-tert-butyltetraoxa[8]circulene and its unusual aggregation behavior. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 6320–6325 (2011).

  44. 44.

    , , , & Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by cyclo-dehydrogenation and skeletal rearrangement of oligophenylenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 36, 1607–1610 (1997).

  45. 45.

    , & Introduction to metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Rev. 112, 673–674 (2012).

  46. 46.

    , , , & Organic chemistry of subvalent transition complexes. 9. oxidative addition of nickel(0) complexes to carbon-carbon bonds in biphenylene: formation of nickelole and 1,2-dinickelecin intermediates. Organometallics 4, 224–231 (1985).

  47. 47.

    , & Mechanistic investigation of catalytic carbon-carbon bond activation and formation by platinum and palladium phosphine complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 120, 2843–2853 (1998).

  48. 48.

    , & Intercepting palladacycles derived by C-H insertion. A mechanism-driven entry to heterocyclic tetraphenylenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 694–695 (2006).

  49. 49.

    & 1, 4-Migration of rhodium and palladium in catalytic organometallic reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 7512–7517 (2005).

  50. 50.

    , , & Organopalladium(IV) chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39, 712–733 (2010).

  51. 51.

    , & Synthesis of fused polycyclic aromatics by palladium-catalyzed annulation of arynes using 2-halobiaryls. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 15716–15717 (2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the “1000-Youth Talents Plan”, the “Jiangsu Specially-Appointed Professor Plan”, NSF of China (Grant 21402086, 21401099), and NSF of Jiangsu Province (Grant BK20140594) for financial support. This work was also supported by a Project Funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. State Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210093, China

    • Chendan Zhu
    • , Yue Zhao
    • , Di Wang
    • , Wei-Yin Sun
    •  & Zhuangzhi Shi

Authors

  1. Search for Chendan Zhu in:

  2. Search for Yue Zhao in:

  3. Search for Di Wang in:

  4. Search for Wei-Yin Sun in:

  5. Search for Zhuangzhi Shi in:

Contributions

C.Z. and D.W. performed the experiments. Y.Z. performed the crystallographic studies. Z.S. conceived the concept, directed the project and wrote the paper. C.Z., W.-Y.S. and Z.S. discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhuangzhi Shi.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33131

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.