Abstract
In this work, we study the diffusion of nanodroplets on smooth surfaces through molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and theoretical analyses. Molecular dynamics simulations show that nanodroplet surface diffusion is different from that of single molecules and solid particles. The dependence of nanodroplet diffusion coefficient on temperature undergoes a transition from linear to nonlinear as the surface wettability is weakened due to the coupling of temperature and surface energy. We also develop a simple relation for the diffusion coefficient by using the contact angle and contact radius of the droplet. It works well for a wide range of surface wettabilities and different sized nanodroplets, as confirmed by MD simulations.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The dynamics of nanodroplets on surfaces is of great importance in a variety of areas, including the thermal management of micro-electronic devices1,2, fabrication of self-cleaning surfaces3,4, nanomaterial synthesis5,6,7 and the design of miniaturized chemical reactors8,9. In many applications, the diffusivity of nanodroplets plays a critical role because it determines the coalescence and growth rates of droplets on surfaces, which are essential for water harvesting through surface condensation and droplet-based heat dissipation techniques10,11,12,13. Understanding the surface diffusion of nanodroplets is also critical for non-mechanical droplet movement control, which is affected by surface properties10,14,15. Unfortunately, nanodroplet surface diffusion is rather complex and is not well understood because it strongly depends on surface properties and temperature, which change the shape (e.g. contact angle) of the droplets.
Previous work on surface diffusion is mainly concerned with the random motion of single molecules, clusters and solid nanoparticles16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24. For single molecules, theoretical analyses can be achieved by treating their motions as a series of hops from an adsorption site to another, which are mainly determined by the molecule-surface interaction potential, energy loss during hops and temperature17,25. These factors are expected to be important for nanodroplets. However, the treatment of hopping transport for single molecules does not present the diffusion physics and may not work for nanodroplets. The diffusion of solid nanoparticles on surfaces is generally considered as a combination of rolling, sliding and sticking motions20,21,22,23,24. Although studies show that liquid nanodroplets may behave like solid particles, which can roll and slide on surfaces26,27, nanodroplet diffusion on surfaces is more similar to the Brownian motion of colloidal nanoparticles10,28 in terms of diffusion mechanism because the friction at the droplet-surface interface plays a dominant role. Recently, some work shows that nanodroplets could diffuse very fast on vibrating graphene29 and carbon nanotube30 surfaces due to propagating ripples generated on the surfaces, where the shape of the droplets is a minor issue. On smooth surfaces, however, the shape change of droplets may greatly influence the diffusion. Moreover, the contact angle and contact area of droplets can be easily affected by external parameters, such as temperature and surface energy. These issues make the theoretical analysis challenging and leave nanodroplet surface diffusion poorly understood.
In this report, we investigate the diffusion of water nanodroplets on smooth surfaces through molecular dynamics (MD) simulations and theoretical analyses. The diffusion coefficient is calculated at different temperatures and surface wettabilities. The relationship between the diffusion coefficient D and temperature is found to depend on the surface wettability. The dependence of D on temperature changes from linear to nonlinear as the surface wettability is reduced. This is different from molecular surface diffusion. Furthermore, an expression for the diffusion coefficient is proposed, which is confirmed by MD simulations.
Molecular Dynamics Simulations
Molecular dynamics simulations are conducted using the LAMMPS package31. The simulation system consists of a water nanodroplet and a layer of graphene supported on a substrate, as illustrated in Fig. 1. The graphene is used to ensure a smooth surface. It is also of great interest as an emerging nanomaterial in the studies of droplet-surface interactions23,32. The SPC/E model33 and the AIREBO potential34 are employed to simulate water molecules and graphene, respectively. The SHAKE algorithm is used to maintain the HOH angles and O–H bonds in water molecules. Each oxygen and hydrogen atom in water molecules carry a point charge q equal to −0.8476e and 0.4238e, respectively. The interaction between a pair of water molecules, a and b, is calculated using the combined Lennard-Jones (LJ) and Coulomb potential35,36
where and Å are the binding energy and collision diameter for oxygen atoms, is the distance between the oxygen atoms of the two interacting water molecules, C is Coulomb’s constant and the subscripts i and j represent the ith and jth atom (H or O) of water molecules a and b, respectively. The substrate is described by the embedded atom method potential and the parameters for silver are used37. The interactions among water, graphene and the substrate are described by the LJ potential and the LJ parameters are obtained using the Lorentz-Berthelot mixing rule based on self-interacting parameters35,38. The LJ binding energy for graphene-water interaction is fixed as K, while that for droplet-substrate interaction is varied to consider the effect of surface wettability.
Simulations are performed in canonical (N, V, T) ensembles, where the temperature is controlled by a Nosé-Hoover thermostat. The lengths of the simulation cell in the x, y and z directions are 17.7, 19.6 and 20 nm, respectively. Periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) are applied in all the directions. Droplets containing 596 and 1168 water molecules are considered, for which the dimensions of the simulation cell are sufficiently large such that the interaction between the droplet and its periodic images caused by PBCs does not affect the motion of the droplet39. The cut-off distance is set to be 1.4 nm and 1 nm for the LJ and short range Coulomb potentials, respectively. Particle-Particle Particle-Mesh (PPPM) method is applied to account for the long range Coulombic force. The time step is set as 2 fs. There are four layers of atoms in the substrate. The atoms in the bottom layer of the substrate are fixed, while those in the other three layers are free to vibrate. The net force on graphene caused by the initialization is removed to keep graphene stationary. The system is relaxed for 300 ps, which is followed by data collection for at least 30 ns. Six simulations with different initial conditions are used to obtain the error bars for the diffusion coefficient.
Result and Discussion
The diffusion of a nanodroplet containing 1168 water molecules (n = 1168) is studied first by changing the temperature T and droplet-substrate binding energy , which governs the surface wettability. The diffusion coefficient D of the droplet in the x-y plane is obtained by calculating the mean square displacement (MSD) of the center-of-mass (COM) of the droplet,
where t is time, is the position of the COM of the droplet at time t in the x-y plane and denotes the ensemble average. Figure 2 shows D as a function of T at different values in a wide range. It is seen that the dependence of D on T is greatly affected by the droplet-surface interaction strength. At large values, i.e. high surface energy and strong droplet-surface interaction, D increases linearly with increasing T. However, the dependence of D on T trends to be nonlinear as the interaction is weakened (the surface becomes less wetting), which is different from the surface diffusion of single molecules17.
The general explanation for the diffusion behaviors in Fig. 2 lies in the roles of temperature and , which measures the droplet-surface interaction strength. As is increased, the friction at the interface is enhanced, which grows to be the dominant factor and reduces the diffusion coefficient at a given temperature, as indicated in Fig. 2. The effects of temperature are two folds. A high temperature on one hand enhances the mobility of the droplet, on the other hand, increases the friction between the droplet and surface due to the enhanced thermal motions of water molecules and substrate atoms, which strengthen the droplet-surface interaction and the enlarged contact area when the temperature is raised, as will be discussed later. The contact area change is special for nanodroplets and makes the diffusion nontrivial. The linear increase of D in Fig. 2 for K is mainly due to the enhanced mobility of the droplet as T is increased because the friction caused by T, in this case, is insignificant compared with that due to the strong water-surface interaction. At small values, however, the droplet-surface interaction is relatively weak and the temperature induced friction is apt to be important, which counteracts the mobility enhancement as T is raised. This is why the diffusion coefficient levels off as T is increased.
The coupled effects of temperature and droplet-surface interactions on the diffusion coefficient bring inconvenience in practical applications, where a simple expression for D is desired. To rephrase the results and develop a simple relation for D, it is preferred to employ the droplet contact angle θ and contact radius rB (the radius of the contact area), which are two key parameters for describing droplet motions. The contact angle can be obtained based on the density distribution of the droplet at equilibrium. Figure 3(a) depicts the density contours of the droplet at room temperature, which can be used to determine the contact angle θ (Fig. 3(b)). It is also seen that the shape of the droplet can be approximated as a spherical cap32,40 and the contact radius rB can be calculated as based on the radius of the sphere, 41, where V is the volume of the droplet, as illustrated in Fig. 3(b). Figure 4 shows θ and rB of the droplet as a function of temperature at different values. Generally, the contact angle decreases and the contact radius increases with increasing temperature for a given value. This is because the surface tension of water droplets decreases as temperature is raised, which reduces the contact angle according to the Young-Laplace equation42. At a constant temperature, the contact angle is reduced and the contact radius is increased as the droplet-surface interaction is strengthened because the surface becomes more wetting at larger values43.
Theories for molecular surface diffusion and particle transport in fluids suggest that diffusion coefficients are mainly determined by T and friction coefficient γ17,44. To be in line with previous transport theories and for the ease of practical applications, a simple expression similar to Einstein’s relation is desired for nanodroplet diffusion if the friction coefficient could be properly defined,
where k is the Boltzmann constant. According to the Green-Kubo correlation formula45,46,47, γ can be calculated as
where is the total lateral force acting on the droplet by the surface at time t. The force correlation term in Eq. (4) can be approximated as46
where τ is the relaxation time of the total lateral force, when , . τ depends on the mean square force and is related to the relaxation of the surface tension, which is independent of the viscosity of the fluid48, indicating that τ is insensitive to temperature. Furthermore, we have calculated τ for different surface properties through MD simulations and found that τ remains unchanged even if the droplet-surface interaction is varied in a wide range, as shown in Table 1. Therefore, it is reasonable to treat τ as a constant. Generally, should be proportional to the contact area. However, for nanodroplets, is mainly determined by the lateral force on the droplet around the contact line because the motions of water molecules at the interface are largely governed by the contact line and the surface tension close to the contact line is much larger than that at the interior part48. The mean area around the contact line is , where λ is the radial fluctuation of the contact line and is roughly a constant. Hence, is proportional to the contact radius rB. In addition, is also affected by temperature due to the thermal motion of water molecules and surface atoms and a linear dependence of on temperature has been suggested for small droplets49. Considering that , the friction coefficient γ in Eq. (4) can be written as
Droplet-surface LJ binding energy is a microscopic parameter, which is not suitable for characterizing droplet dynamics. Practically, contact angle θ is widely used for describing droplet motions and it is desired to represent using θ. It has been shown that 50,51,52, with which, it is obtained that
Equation (7) suggests a general relation for the surface diffusion of nanodroplets. Figure 5(a) plots as a function of kT for the results in Fig. 2. It is seen that all the data roughly fall on the same straight line, which confirms the simple expression in Eq. (7). To further verify the Eq. (7), the diffusion coefficient of a droplet containing 596 water molecules is also calculated by changing the temperature for different surface wettabilities. As expected, the general dependence of D on T agrees very well with Eq. (7), as shown in Fig. 5(b). A linear fit for all the data in Fig. 5(a,b), as shown in the inset of Fig. 5(b), gives an expression for the diffusion coefficient
where is a constant and . The unit of α is the same as viscosity. However, α is independent of droplet size and temperature. in Eq. (8) can be viewed as an ad hoc temperature, which might be related to the freezing point of water nanodroplets, below which droplets become solid particles and Eq. (8) is invalid.
It is noted that Eq. (8) is obtained by assuming that the fluctuations in the lateral force are mainly from molecules around the contact line, which is valid for small droplets. For sufficiently large droplets, the thermal motion of droplet molecules in the interior of the contact area may also contribute to the force correlation function. Hence, there might be a critical droplet size, beyond which Eq. (7) is inaccurate. This critical size is beyond the scope of current work and will be explored in the future. It is worth mentioning that approaches zero as the contact angle is close to 180o, which is a singular point for Eq. (8). Actually, recent investigations53,54,55 showed that the relation, , breaks down when the surface is superhydrophobic, where Eq. (7) is invalid.
Conclusions
In summary, we have investigated the diffusion of water nanodroplets on supported graphene surfaces through MD simulations. A simple relation for the diffusion coefficient has been developed on the basis of theoretical analyses, which is confirmed by MD simulations.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Li, C. et al. A Relation for Nanodroplet Diffusion on Smooth Surfaces. Sci. Rep. 6, 26488; doi: 10.1038/srep26488 (2016).
References
Boreyko, J. B. & Chen, C. Self-Propelled Dropwise Condensate on Superhydrophobic Surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 184501 (2009).
Leach, R. N., Stevens, F., Langford, S. C. & Dickinson, J. T. Dropwise Condensation: Experiments and Simulations of Nucleation and Growth of Water Drops in a Cooling System. Langmuir 22, 8864–8872 (2006).
Blossey, R. Self-cleaning Surfaces-Virtual Realities. Nat. Mater. 2, 301–306 (2003).
Deng, X., Mammen, L., Butt, H. J. & Vollmer, D. Candle Soot as a Template for a Transparent Robust Superamphiphobic Coating. Science 335, 67–70 (2012).
Xu, W., Leeladhar, R., Tsai, Y., Yang, E. & Choi, C. Evaporative Self-assembly of Nanowires on Superhydrophobic Surfaces of Nanotip Latching Structures. App. Phys. Lett. 98, 073101 (2011).
Hannon, J. B., Kodambaka, S., Ross, F. M. & Tromp, R. M. The Influence of the Surface Migration of Gold on the Growth of Silicon Nanowires. Nature 440, 69–71 (2006).
Einax, M., Dieterich, W. & Maass, P. Colloquium: Cluster Growth on Surfaces: Densities, Size Distributions and Morphologies. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 921–939 (2013).
Yao, X. et al. Running Droplet of Interfacial Chemical Reaction Flow. Soft Matter 8, 5988–5991 (2012).
Fallah-Araghi, A. et al. Enhanced Chemical Synthesis at Soft Interfaces: A Universal Reaction-Adsorption Mechanism in Microcompartments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 028301 (2014).
Daniel, S., Chaudhury, M. K. & Chen, J. C. Fast Drop Movements Resulting from the Phase Change on a Gradient Surface. Science 291, 633–636 (2001).
Miljkovic, N., Enright, R. & Wang, E. N. Effect of Droplet Morphology on Growth Dynamics and Heat Transfer during Condensation on Superhydrophobic Nanostructured Surfaces. ACS Nano 6, 1776–1785 (2012).
Zheng, Y. et al. Directional Water Collection on Wetted Spider Silk. Nature 463, 640–643 (2010).
Andrews, H. G., Eccles, E. A., Schofield, W. C. E. & Badyal, J. P. S. Three-Dimensional Hierarchical Structures for Fog Harvesting. Langmuir 27, 3798–3802 (2011).
Hernández, S. C. et al. Chemical Gradients on Graphene to Drive Droplet Motion. ACS Nano 7, 4746–4755 (2013).
Xu, L., Li, Z. G. & Yao, S. H. Directional Motion of Evaporating Droplets on Gradient Surfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 064101 (2012).
Ala-Nissila, T., Ferrando, R. & Ying, S. C. Collective and Single Particle Diffusion on Surfaces. Adv. Phys. 51, 949–1078 (2002).
Li, C., Huang, B., Cao, L. & Li, Z. Molecular Diffusion on Surfaces in the Weak Friction Limit. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 214906 (2014).
Hedgeland, H. et al. Measurement of Single-Molecule Frictional Dissipation in a Prototypical Nanoscale System. Nat. Phys. 5, 561–564 (2009).
Kim, M., Anthony, S. M. & Granick, S. Activated Surface Diffusion in a Simple Colloid System. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 178303 (2009).
Maruyama, Y. & Murakami, J. Truncated Lèvy Walk of a Nanocluster Bound Weakly to an Atomically Flat Surface: Crossover from Superdiffusion to Normal Diffusion. Phys. Rev. B 67, 085406 (2003).
Alkis, A., Krause, J. L., Fry, J. N. & Cheng, H.-P. Dynamics of Ag Clusters on Complex Surfaces: Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Phys. Rev. B 79, 121402(R) (2009).
Ryu, J. H., Seo, D. H., Kim, D. H. & Lee, H. M. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the Diffusion and Rotation of Pt Nanoclusters Supported on Graphite. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 503–507 (2009).
Guerra, R., Tartaglino, U., Vanossi, A. & Tosatti, E. Ballistic Nanofriction. Nat. Mater. 9, 634–637 (2010).
Förster, G. D. & Rabilloud, F. Adsorption of Metal Nanoparticles on Carbon Substrates and Epitaxial Graphene: Assessing Models for Dispersion Forces. Phys. Rev. B 91, 245433 (2015).
Kramers, H. A. Brownian Motion in a Field of Force and the Diffusion Model of Chemical Reactions, Physica 7, 284–304 (1940).
Celestini, F. Diffusion of a Liquid Nanoparticle on a Disordered Substrate. Phys. Rev. B 70, 115402 (2004).
Ho, T. A., Papavassiliou, D. V., Lee, L. L. & Striolo, A. Liquid Water Can Slip on a Hydrophilic Surface. PNAS 108, 16170–16175 (2011).
Li, Z. G. & Wang, H. Drag Force, Diffusion Coefficient and Electric Mobility of Small Particles. I. Theory Applicable to the Free-Molecule Regime. Phys. Rev. E, 68, 061206 (2003).
Ma, M., Tocci, G., Michaelides, A. & Aeppli, G. Fast Diffusion of Water Nanodroplets on Graphene. Nat. Mater. 15, 66–71 (2016).
Russell, J. T., Wang, B. & Král, P. Nanodroplet Transport on Vibrated Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 353–357 (2012).
Plimpton, S. Fast Parallel Algorithms for Short-Range Molecular Dynamics. J. Comp. Phys. 117, 1–19 (1995).
Raj, R., Maroo, S. C. & Wang, E. N. Wettability of Graphene. Nano Lett. 13, 1509–1515 (2013).
Berendsen, H. J. C., Grigera, J. R. & Straatsma, T. P. The Missing Term in Effective Pair Potentials. J. Phys. Chem. 91, 6269–6271 (1987).
Stuart, S. J., Tutein, A. B. & Harrison, J. A. A Reactive Potential for Hydrocarbons with Intermolecular Interactions. J. Chem. Phys. 112, 6472–6486 (2000).
Gao, X., Zhao, T. & Li, Z. Effects of Ions on the Diffusion Coefficient of Water in Carbon Nanotubes, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 054311 (2014).
Heinz, H., Vaia, R. A., Farmer, B. L. & Naik, R. R. Accurate Simulation of Surfaces and Interfaces of Face-Centered Cubic Metals Using 12-6 and 9-6 Lennard-Jones Potentials, J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 17281–17290 (2008).
Daw, M. S. & Baskes, M. I. Semiempirical, Quantum Mechanical Calculation of Hydrogen Embrittlement in Metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1285 (1983).
Liu, C. & Li, Z. Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Composite Nanochannels as Nanopumps Driven by Symmetric Temperature Gradients. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 174501 (2010).
Li, Z. Critical Particle Size Where the Stokes-Einstein Relation Breaks Down. Phys. Rev. E 80, 061204 (2009).
Weijs, J. H., Marchand, A., Andreotti, B., Lohse, D. & Snoeijer, J. H. Origin of Line Tension for a Lennard-Jones Nanodroplet. Phys. Fluids 23, 022001 (2011).
Hung, S. W., Hsiao, P. Y., Chen, C. P. & Chieng, C. C. Wettability of Graphene-Coated Surface: Free Energy Investigations Using Molecular Dynamics Simulation, J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 8103–8111 (2015).
Stokes, R. J. & Evans, D. F. Fundamentals of Interfacial Engineering (Wiley-VCH, New York 1997).
Mo, J. M. et al. Fluid Infiltration Pressure for Hydrophobic Nanochannels. Phys. Rev. E 91, 033022 (2015).
Li, Z. G. & Wang, H. Drag Force, Diffusion Coefficient and Electric Mobility of Small Particles. II. Application. Phys. Rev. E 68, 061207 (2003).
Huang, D. M., Sendner, C., Horinek, D., Netz, R. R. & Bocquet, L. Water Slippage Versus Contact Angle: A Quasiuniversal Relationship. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 226101 (2008).
Kudo, R. The Fluctuation-Dissipation Theorem. Rep. Prog. Phys. 29, 255–284 (1966).
Bocquet, L. & Barrat, J. On the Green-Kubo Relationship for the Liquid-Solid Friction Coefficient. J. Chem. Phys. 139, 044704 (2013).
Lukyanov, A. V. & Likhtman, A. E. Relaxation of Surface Tension in the Liquid-Solid Interfaces of Lennard-Jones Liquids. Langmuir 29, 13996–14000 (2013).
Morgado, R., Oliveira, A. F., Batrouni, G. G. & Hansen, A. Relation between Anomalous and Normal Diffusion in System with Memory. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 100601 (2002).
Sendner, C., Horinek, d ., Bocquet, L. & Netz, R. R. Interfacial Water at Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Surfaces: Slip, Viscosity and Diffusion. Langmuir 25, 10768–10781 (2009).
Sedlmerer, F. et al. Water at Polar and Nonpolar Solid Walls. Bointerphases 3, FC23–FC39 (2008).
Machlin, E. S. On Interfacial Tension at a Rigid Apolar Wall-Water Interface, Langmuir 28, 16729–16732 (2012).
Kumar, V. & Errington, J. R. Wetting Behavior of Water near Nonpolar Surfaces, J. Phys. Chem. C 117, 23017–23026 (2013).
Evans, R. & Wilding, N. B. Quantifying Density Fluctuations in Water at a Hydrophobic Surface: Evidence for Critical Drying. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 016103 (2015).
Leroy, F. & Müller-Plathe, F. Dry-Surface Simulation Method for the Determination of the Work of Adhesion of Solid-Liquid Interfaces. Langmuir 31, 8335–8345 (2015).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region under Grant No. 615312. C.L. was partly supported by a Postgraduate Scholarship through the Energy Program at HKUST.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.L. and J.H. performed molecular dynamics simulations. C.L. conducted theoretical analysis and analyzed data. Z.L. conceived the work and wrote the manuscript. All the authors discussed and approved the results and conclusions of this report.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Li, C., Huang, J. & Li, Z. A Relation for Nanodroplet Diffusion on Smooth Surfaces. Sci Rep 6, 26488 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26488
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep26488
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.