Introduction

Transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have attracted a great deal of attention in recent years due to their great potential in various fields including microelectronics, flexible devices, lithium batteries, and optoelectronics1,2,3,4,5,6. Among two-dimensional (2D) TMDs, molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), which has a large band gap (1.8 eV), is a suitable material for 2D logic devices and integrated circuits. However, there are two crucial requirements for application in MoS2-based nanoelectronics: (i) the synthesis of large-area MoS2 nanosheets of high quality and (ii) reliable control of the carrier density in MoS2 nanosheets via chemical doping. In recent studies, mechanical and chemical exfoliation methods that utilize bulk MoS2 have been performed to obtain monolayer MoS27,8. However, these methods must be improved to enable the large-scale synthesis of monolayer MoS2 in order to apply them to flexible nanoelectronics. The synthesis of single-layer MoS2 by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) is suitable for large-scale growth of MoS2. In this process, MoS2 nanosheets have generally been obtained by sulfurization reactions of deposited molybdenum or molybdenum oxide9,10. Recently, various seeding promoters have been employed for the synthesis of large-scale MoS2 nanosheets11. However, obtaining a facile synthesis methodology for high-quality MoS2 nanosheets with a uniform thickness still remains as a challenge. In addition, many approaches for the chemical doping of MoS2 nanosheets have been reported in order to allow for the manipulation of the carrier density in MoS2; the various dopants that have been used include K atoms, Au nanoparticles (NPs), and aromatic molecules12,13,14,15,16,17.

In this study, we present a new approach for the simultaneous large-scale synthesis and doping of MoS2 nanosheets by applying metalloporphyrin layers as a seeding promoter layer. As shown in Fig. 1, a H2TPP thin layer was first formed on a SiO2 substrate by thermal evaporation. Subsequent metalation of the H2TPP films was carried out for the formation of different metalloporphyrins such as Al(III)-tetraphenyl porphyrin (Al(III)TPP) or Zn(II) meso-tetra(4-hydroxyphenyl) porphyrin (Zn(II)THPP). Here, the metallic atoms in metalloporphyrin were used as dopants for the MoS2 nanosheets. For the preparation of metalloporphyrins, including Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP, we utilized an alternative synthetic method consisting of the thermal evaporation of organic molecules and the metalation process for the formation of metalloporphyrin (Fig. S1 in the Supporting Information). Conventional thermal CVD (TCVD) was subsequently carried out for the simultaneous large-scale synthesis and doping of MoS2 nanosheets on the metalloporphyrin layers. These MoS2 nanosheets were transferred to arbitrary substrates such as SiO2 and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) substrates. Finally, Cr/Au electrodes were deposited onto the MoS2 nanosheets to complete the MoS2-based electrical devices.

Figure 1: Schematic of the synthesis process of metalloporphyrin and MoS2 nanosheets.
figure 1

The procedure utilizes a hybrid deposition system combining (a) thermal evaporation and (b) a metalation process. (c) Growth of MoS2 nanosheets on a seeding promoter layer. (d) The transfer of MoS2 films on metalloporphyrin toward target substrates. (e) The fabrication of the MoS2-based device.

Results

Preparation of Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP promoter layers

A hybrid deposition system that combines thermal evaporation and a metalation process was utilized for the synthesis of the metalloporphyrin promoter (Fig. S1 in the Supporting Information). Here, H2TPP was employed as the main organic source and trimethylaluminum (TMA) and diethylzinc (DEZ) were used as the precursors for the Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP promoters, respectively. In the case of the Al(III)TPP promoter, the formation mechanism of metalloporphyrin (i.e., Al(III)TPP) can be explained by a two-step reaction (Fig. S2(a) in the Supporting Information). In the first step, H2TPP molecules were evaporated on a solid substrate via thermal evaporation. Next, the TMA precursor was introduced into the reactor where it reacted with H2TPP; in this process, two pyrrolic nitrogen atoms in the center of H2TPP coordinated with an Al atom of TMA during metalation (H2TPP + Al(CH3)3 → Al(III)TPP (CH3) + 2CH4↑). Two methyl groups (−CH3) of TMA and the hydrogen of pyrrolic nitrogen combined to form methane (CH4) as a byproduct; this was removed by a purging process. Finally, the Al atom that was bonded with two pyrrolic nitrogens was coordinated by two iminic nitrogen atoms in the center of H2TPP. Thereafter, the thicknesses of the Al(III)TPP layers were controlled by repeating this two-step reaction (i.e., H2TPP evaporation and Al metalation). Importantly, the electrical properties of the MoS2 nanosheets can be easily and accurately controlled by adjusting the type and density of the dopants of the MoS2 layers. For the formation of the Zn(II)THPP promoter, the DEZ precursor reacts chemically with THPP molecules on the solid substrate via a gas phase metalation process. Here, four Zn atoms of DEZ interacted with hydroxyl groups on the meso position of porphyrin. Additionally, two pyrrolic and iminic nitrogen atoms in the center of the porphyrin molecule coordinated with a Zn atom of DEZ during the metalation process. Afterwards, vapor-phase ethyl groups in DEZ were eliminated completely in the form of C2H6 as byproducts. (THPP + 6Zn(CH2CH3)2 → Zn(II)THPP + 6C2H6↑) (Fig. 3S of the Supporting Information).

Figure 2: Large-scale growth of MoS2 nanosheets using Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP seeding promoters.
figure 2

(a) AFM images of the MoS2 films on metalloporphyrin (Al(III)TPP) as a function of Al(III)TPP thickness ((i) 2, (ii) 8, (iii) 16, and (iv) 24 nm). (v) Plots of the RMS roughness of the MoS2 films on the Al(III)TPP promoter as a function of the number of Al(III)TPP layers. (b) An SEM image of MoS2 nanosheets on metalloporphyrin promoters ((i) Al(III)TPP and (ii) Zn(II)THPP). The inset shows a photograph of MoS2 nanosheets. (c) Photograph of MoS2 nanosheets transferred onto a flexible substrate (PET) by PMMA-assisted wet transfer.

Figure 3: Raman characterization of MoS2 nanosheets.
figure 3

(a) Raman spectra of Al(III)TPP and MoS2 nanosheets on Al(III)TPP promoter layers before and after the PMMA-assisted wet transfer. (b) Raman A1g-E2g map of the MoS2 nanosheets on Al(III)TPP promoter layers. (c) Raman spectra of MoS2 films grown with various Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP thicknesses. (d) The difference between the A1g and E2g Raman modes of the MoS2 nanosheets as a function of Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP thickness.

CVD growth of MoS2 nanosheets on Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP promoter layers

Conventional TCVD was utilized for the simultaneous large-scale synthesis and doping of MoS2 nanosheets on metalloporphyrin promoter layers. Here, the thickness of the metalloporphyrin promoter layers was manipulated by adjusting the number of metalloporphyrin coating cycles to tune the carrier density of the MoS2 nanosheets. A metalloporphyrin promoter layer, on a solid substrate, was placed onto an alumina boat in the center of the reactor, as illustrated in Fig. S4 of the Supporting Information. A Mo solution was prepared by dissolving 0.1 M ammonium heptamolybdate in distilled water; this was subsequently spin-coated onto SiO2 substrates. Sulfur powder, which was used as the sulfur source, was located upstream in the reactor. MoS2 nanosheets were grown at 600 °C while introducing Ar gas for 5 min.

We investigated the evolution of the surface morphologies of MoS2 nanosheets formed on Al(III)TPP promoters with a variety of thicknesses (i.e., 2, 8, 16, and 24 nm thick), as shown in Fig. 2(a). As the Al(III)TPP thickness increased, the root mean square (RMS) roughness of the MoS2 nanosheets increased. The RMS roughness of the nanosheets was approximately 1.0 nm, indicating that our MoS2 nanosheets have an ultra-flat surface. As shown in Fig. 2(b), representative scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of MoS2 nanosheets grown on (i) Al(III)TPP and (ii) Zn(II)THPP promoter layers confirmed that continuous MoS2 nanosheets with a uniform thickness were synthesized on the promoter layers; this result is dissimilar from previous results, including the synthesis of triangular MoS2 flakes11. The photograph in the inset of Fig. 2(b) exhibits the excellent uniformity of the MoS2 nanosheets on (i) Al(III)TPP and (ii) Zn(II)THPP over large areas (4 × 4 cm2).

In addition, we also applied a poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA)-assisted wet transfer method for the fabrication of MoS2-based flexible devices18. Figure 2(c) shows a photograph of MoS2 nanosheets transferred onto polyethylene terephthalate (PET). Here, PMMA was spin-coated onto the MoS2 surface, and a PMMA-coated MoS2/SiO2 substrate was placed in 4 M NaOH in DI water. After the SiO2 layer was completely etched away, the PMMA-coated MoS2 nanosheets were transferred to the target substrates. Finally, the PMMA layer was eliminated by rinsing with acetone, and the remaining MoS2 nanosheets were rinsed with DI water. Raman spectroscopy confirmed that the transferred MoS2 nanosheets on the target substrate were stable under these transferring and etching processes. It should be noted that our method allows us to synthesize large-scale, two-dimensional MoS2 nanosheets with uniform thickness.

Raman characterization of MoS2 nanosheets on Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP layers

Raman spectroscopy, which is a powerful nondestructive characterization tool, was utilized to study the crystalline structures of the MoS2 nanosheets grown on metalloporphyrin. In the Raman spectra of the MoS2 sheets on the initial substrate and the transferred MoS2 film, two prominent peaks at ~408 cm−1 and ~386 cm−1, which originated from the out-of-plane vibration mode (A1g mode) of sulfur atoms and the in-plane vibration mode (E2g mode) of molybdenum and sulfur atoms, respectively, were observed. These peaks were also present after the transfer process onto the desired substrate (Fig. 3(a)), indicating that the MoS2 nanosheets were stable during the wet transfer processes (including wet-etching and the removal of PMMA). In addition, the number of MoS2 layers can be identified by analyzing the energy difference between the A1g and E2g modes10. Figure 3(b) shows the uniformity of MoS2 layers on the Al(III)TPP promoter, as evaluated by Raman mapping. Here, Raman maps of A1g-E2g confirmed the excellent uniformity of the number of layers. Figure 3(c,d) show the Raman spectra and the energy difference of the A1g and E2g modes for MoS2 nanosheets on Al(III)TPP (or Zn(II)THPP) promoter layers as a function of the number of coating cycles, respectively. These results indicate that bilayer MoS2 nanosheets were synthesized with 2–20 nm of the Al(III)TPP (or 0–3.5 nm Zn(II)THPP) promoter and monolayer MoS2 was obtained with 24–28 nm of the Al(III)TPP (or 5.25–10.5 nm Zn(II)THPP) promoter. Remarkably, this result showed that mono- and bi-layer MoS2 nanosheets were fabricated by adjusting the thickness of the Al(III)TPP (or Zn(II)THPP) promoter layers. The UV-Vis absorption spectra of the MoS2 nanosheets that were transferred onto PET revealed two prominent absorption peaks (A1 and B1 exciton transitions) at 655 nm (1.89 eV) and 610 nm (2.03 eV), which is similar to the results of a previous study19. The intensity of these two peaks decreased as the number of coating cycles of Al(III)TPP promoter layers increased, indicating that the layer number of MoS2 sheets decreased when using a promoter layer with a thickness between 20 and 30 nm (S5 in the Supporting Information). This result is in good agreement with the Raman analysis shown in Fig. S5 in the Supporting Information.

Electrical properties of MoS2 nanosheets synthesized on Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP promoters

In order to characterize the electrical properties of the MoS2 nanosheets synthesized on metalloporphyrin promoters with various thicknesses, MoS2-based devices were fabricated via conventional microfabrication processes (e.g., photo-lithography) and thermal evaporation was used to make the electrodes. Here, the MoS2 channel length and width were 100 and 40 mm, respectively, and Cr/Au was used as the source and drain electrodes. The output characteristics (IDS-VDS) of the nanoscale devices made with MoS2 on Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP, with various thicknesses, were measured as a function of the number of coating cycles. These results demonstrate that the electrical conductivity of MoS2 gradually increases as the thickness of the Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP promoters increases, as shown in Fig. 4(a). Figure 4(b) also shows the extracted resistance of the MoS2 nanosheets grown on Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP promoters with various thicknesses. These results indicate that the resistance of MoS2 nanosheets remains unchanged when a promoter layer above a specific thickness is used during the growth processes. Additionally, an electrical double-layer transistor based on MoS2 on metalloporphyrin was demonstrated by using 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium (BmimPF6) as an ionic liquid gate20,21. Here, the length and width of the channel between the Cr/Au electrodes were 100 and 40 μm, respectively. Figure 4(c) shows the representative transfer characteristics (IDS-VG) at VDS = 1 V for MoS2-based transistors grown on metalloporphyrin. To analyze the doping effect caused by the metalloporphyrin promoter, MoS2 sheets grown on metalloporphyrin layers with different thickness were prepared. In the case of a MoS2 layer on a metal-free p-THPP promoter, n-type semiconducting behavior with an on-off ratio of 102 and a threshold voltage of about 0.5 V was observed, as shown in Fig. 4(c). When using metalloporphyrin promoters, such as Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP, the on-off ratio decreased. For example, MoS2-based transistors on 28-nm-thick Al(III)TPP and 10.5-nm-thick Zn(II)THPP promoters exhibited metallic behavior, which confirmed the doping effect of metalloporphyrin. However, as shown in Figure S9 in Supporting Information, the electron mobility of the MoS2-based transistors decreased as increasing promoter thickness, since the dopant of metalloporphyrin produced impurity scattering in the MoS2 nanosheets.

Figure 4: Electrical properties of MoS2 nanosheets synthesized on metalloporphyrin promoters.
figure 4

(a) Output characteristics (IDS-VDS) of MoS2 nanosheets grown on (i) Al(III)TPP and (ii) Zn(II)THPP promoters with various thicknesses; these were mediated by adjusting the number of coating cycles. (b) The extracted resistance of MoS2 nanosheets as a function of the thickness of (i) Al(III)TPP and (ii) Zn(III)THPP promoters. (c) Transfer characteristics (IDS-VG) of MoS2 nanosheets grown on (i) Al(III)TPP and (ii) Zn(II)THPP promoters with various thicknesses (mediated).

Discussion

X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of MoS2 nanosheets synthesized on Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP promoter layers

In order to analyze the mechanism that causes the increase of MoS2 nanosheets on the metalloporphyrin, XPS was utilized. First, we prepared MoS2 sheets on the Al(III)TPP promoter with various thicknesses. Figure 5(a–c) exhibit the Mo 3d, S 2p, and Al 2p core level spectra obtained from MoS2 nanosheets synthesized on Al(III)TPP promoter layers with various thicknesses, which were obtained by adjusting the number of coating cycles. Interestingly, the Mo 3d and S 2p peaks shifted to higher binding energies whereas the Al 2p peak shifted to a lower binding energy as the thickness of the Al(III)TPP promoter layer was increased (Fig. 5(d)). This behavior can be understood in terms of the effect of n-type doping of the Al nanoparticles (AlNPs) extracted from the Al(III)TPP promoter; this effect originates from electron charge transfer from Al (4.08 eV) to MoS2 (4.7 eV), which is induced by differences in the work function22,23. When the TCVD was heated to the target temperature during MoS2 synthesis, the thickness of the Al(III)TPP promoter layers decreased because of thermal evaporation. In this process, the carbon component was partially evaporated, whereas Al remained, as shown in Fig. S6 in the Supporting Information. This result was supported by the fact that the intensity of the Al 2p peak obtained from Al(III)TPP increased and the intensity of the C 1s peak decreased after annealing at 900 °C, as shown in Fig. S6 in the Supporting Information. Consequently, the remaining AlNPs electrically interacted with the upper MoS2 nanosheets and acted as n-type dopants. Furthermore, no noticeable change in the binding energy of the C 1s peak was observed, as shown in Fig. S7 of the Supporting Information. This indicates that there is no electrical interaction between the thinned Al(III)TPP promoter layers and the MoS2 nanosheets. Furthermore, in the case of the Zn(II)THPP promoter, the XPS results also indicated that the conductance increase in MoS2 nanosheets resulted from the doping effect of Zn nanoparticles. This is similar to what occurred in Al(III)TPP (Fig. S8 in the Supporting Information).

Figure 5: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of MoS2 nanosheets synthesized on Al(III)TPP promoter layers.
figure 5

(a) Mo 3d, (b) S 2p, and (c) Al 2p core level spectra of MoS2 nanosheets using Al(III)TPP promoters with various thicknesses (2–28 nm). (d) The binding energy shifts (ΔEB) of Mo 3d, S 2p, and Al 2p of MoS2 nanosheets as a function of Al(III)TPP thickness.

In summary, we demonstrated an innovative method for the simultaneous large-scale synthesis and doping of MoS2 nanosheets using metalloporphyrin promoters such as Al(III)TPP and Zn(II)THPP. We first prepared metalloporphyrin promoters using a hybrid deposition system that utilized thermal evaporation and metalation. The structural and electrical characteristics of MoS2 nanosheets on metalloporphyrin promoters with various thicknesses were systematically investigated. In addition, the effect of n-type doping of metallic nanoparticles extracted from the promoter was explored through XPS analysis. Our facile approach may pave the way for the large-scale synthesis of high-quality MoS2 nanosheets and the fabrication of MoS2 nanosheets with controlled electrical conductivity for advanced two-dimensional nanoelectronic applications.

Methods

Preparation of the Al(III)TPP (or Zn(II)THPP) promoter layer

Al(III)TPP (or Zn(II)THPP) thin films used as a promoter layer were formed on SiO2 (300 nm)/Si (100) using a hybrid deposition system that combined thermal evaporation and ALD, as depicted in Fig. 2a. The following growth process was implemented. First, the sample was placed on a rotatable holder in the main chamber. Then, 5, 10, 15, 20-tetraphenylporphyrin (H2TPP) (or 5, 10, 15, 20-​tetrakis(4-​hydroxyphenyl)-21H, 23H-porphyrin (THPP)) was deposited on the SiO2 surface by opening the main gate valve and facing the sample downward. After the deposition of 0.35-nm-thick H2TPP (or THPP) films, the main gate valve was closed and the sample holder was rotated upward. Al(III)TPP (or Zn(II)THPP) films were formed onto the monolayer H2TPP (or THPP) films by introducing trimethyl aluminum (TMA) (or diethyl zinc (DEZ)) under 1.3 × 10−1 Torr for 5 s (or 1.4 × 10−1 Torr for 40 s). Finally, a purge process was conducted by flowing liquid nitrogen gas at 500 sccm for 30 s. Al(III)TPP (or Zn(II)THPP) films were eventually formed by repeating this growth cycle. The thicknesses of the Al(III)TPP (or Zn(II)THPP) films were controlled by adjusting the number of coating cycles from 5 to 70 cycles (or from 0 to 30 cycles).

CVD growth of MoS2 nanosheets on Al(III)TPP (or Zn(II)THPP) promoter layers

The Mo solution was prepared by dissolving 0.1 M ammonium heptamolybdate (Fluca, 99%) in 10 mL of distilled water. This solution was subsequently coated onto UV-treated SiO2 (300 nm) substrates by spin-coating at 2000 rpm for 30 s. 0.1 g of sulfur powder (SAMCHUN, 98.0%), which was used as the sulfur source, was located upstream in the reactor. The distance between the sulfur and Mo sources was 19 cm. AlNP (or ZnNP)-doped MoS2 nanosheets were synthesized at 600 °C under ~1 Torr while introducing Ar (500 sccm) for 5 min.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Kim, S. J. et al. Large-scale Growth and Simultaneous Doping of Molybdenum Disulfide Nanosheets. Sci. Rep. 6, 24054; doi: 10.1038/srep24054 (2016).