Abstract
By clustering various ion channels and transporters, ankyrin-G (AnkG) configures the membrane-excitation platforms in neurons and cardiomyocytes. AnkG itself localizes to specific areas on the plasma membrane via s-palmitoylation of Cys. However, the structural mechanism by which AnkG anchors to the membrane is not understood. In this study, we solved the crystal structures of the reduced and oxidized forms of the AnkG s-palmitoylation domain and used multiple long-term coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations to analyze their membrane association. Here we report that the membrane anchoring of AnkG was facilitated by s-palmitoylation, defining a stable binding interface on the lipid membrane and that AnkG without s-palmitoylation also preferred to stay near the membrane but did not have a unique binding interface. This suggests that AnkG in the juxtamembrane region is primed to accept lipid modification at Cys and once that happens AnkG constitutes a rigid structural base upon which a membrane-excitation platform can be assembled.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The electrical activity in the heart and brain is based on the flux of ions across the cell membrane and is mediated by the activities of ion channels, pumps and exchangers. These ion transporting molecules are not distributed randomly in the plasma membrane, but are constrained to specific areas defined by scaffold proteins that bind multiple members of a signaling pathway, tethering them into complexes. One of the major extrasynaptic scaffold proteins is Ankyrin-G (AnkG, encoded by ANK3 gene), which localizes various ion channels, adhesion molecules and receptors by linking to the spectrin cytoskeleton1. AnkG has been detected in the axon initial segment2 and in nodes of Ranvier3, where it tethers voltage-gated ion channels4, as well as in the rod outer segment of the retina5, costameres in skeletal muscle6 and cardiac intercalated discs7 where it mediates formation of signaling complexes. Disorder of AnkG-mediated channel clustering within the heart induces arrhythmias such as Brugada syndrome8 and sinus node dysfunction7, while AnkG in the brain appears to be involved in bipolar disorder9 and autism spectrum disorder10.
The sites at which AnkG locates are not dependent on the distribution of its binding partners11,12,13, but on its palmitoylation14,15, as is also the case for other scaffold proteins16. Palmitoylation is the reversible covalent attachment of fatty acids to Cys, which enhances the hydrophobicity of proteins and appears to play a significant role in the subcellular trafficking of proteins to membrane compartments. Palmitoylation at the Cys (s-palmitoylation) in AnkG was recently shown to be a key determinant for its targeting to epithelial lateral membranes and neuronal axon initial segments15. Palmitoyltransferase DHHC5/8 is required for AnkG palmitoylation and for its localization at the lateral membranes of MDCK cells14. Although s-palmitoylation of synaptic scaffold proteins and their accompanying regulation (e.g., redox-regulation and s-nitrosylation) have been studied extensively with respect regulation of neurotransmission17,18,19,20,21, the study of ankyrin palmitoylation has only just begun and much remains unknown.
Ankyrin family proteins, ankyrin-R (AnkR, encoded by ANK1 gene), ankyrin-B (AnkB, encoded by ANK2 gene) and AnkG, all consist of four functional domains: a membrane-binding domain, a spectrin binding domain, a death domain that binds to proteins involved in apoptosis and a variable C-terminal regulatory domain1 (Fig. 1A). The membrane-binding domain consists of 24 tandem ankyrin repeats that bind to various types of ion channels and cell adhesion proteins (Fig. 1A). This domain also contains a conserved Cys within a loop structure between the 1st and 2nd repeats, which is reported to be the s-palmitoylation site in AnkG15 (Fig. 1A). There have been a few studies of the structural biology of the membrane-binding domain (e.g., the latter half segment of the membrane-binding domain of AnkR22 and the structure of the AnkB membrane-binding domain in complex with regulatory peptides23) but no studies of the structure of AnkG. Particularly desirable, given its impact on the distribution of signaling complexes, is a better understanding of the atomic structure of AnkG palmitoylation. Association of proteins with the plasma membrane via lipid modification has been studied using various cell biological assays, but the structural basis for the interaction remains largely unknown.
In the present study, we solved the crystal structure of the s-palmitoylation region of the AnkG membrane-binding domain and performed a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation of the membrane association of AnkG. Multiple long-term simulations shed light on the features of protein anchoring to the lipid membrane via palmitoylation.
Results
Structural conformation of the AnkG palmitoylation domain
The 33 amino acid residues that comprise each of the 24 ankyrin repeats in the AnkG membrane binding domain are aligned with great regularity (Fig. 1A and Supplementary Fig. S1). An exceptionally short sequence links the 5th repeat (R5) and R6, while an extra sequence exists between R6 and R7 and this pattern is well conserved among all three known ankyrins (AnkR, AnkB and AnkG) (Supplementary Fig. S1). The membrane-binding domain also contains a conserved cysteine residue (Cys70) within the loop structure between R1 and R2 (Supplementary Fig. S1), which is reportedly the s-palmitoylation site in AnkG. Ankyrin repeat domains are widely distributed among many types of proteins and a multiple sequence alignment focusing on the R1-R2 region of the ankyrin repeat domain is shown in Supplementary Fig. S2. Particularly interesting to us was the fact that the Cys residue within the loop structure between R1 and R2 is rare, making lipid anchoring at the head-section of the ankyrin repeat domain unique to AnkR, AnkB and AnkG.
We therefore expressed, purified and crystallized proteins consisting of the head-section of the membrane-binding domain (R1-R5) of rat AnkG. Screening yielded two AnkG (R1-R5) crystal forms, orthorhombic P21212 and monoclinic C121 (Supplementary Fig. S3A,B), which diffracted synchrotron X-rays to 1.62 Å and 1.83 Å, respectively (Table 1). The structure of the P21212 crystal was determined by molecular replacement using the R13-R17 segment of AnkR (PDB code #1N11)22 and an initial structural model was built and refined to an acceptable level (R/Rfree = 16.5/20.8%) (Table 1). Structural determination of the C121 crystal was achieved through molecular replacement using the initial AnkG (R1-R5) crystal structure, after which the resultant structure was refined (Table 1).
The structure of the P21212 crystal shows the typical ankyrin-repeat structure in which each repeat consists of 33 amino acid residues forming two anti-parallel α-helices and a loop ending in a β-hairpin (Fig. 1B). Cys70 is exposed on the protein surface and shows some side-chain flexibility observed as a dual-conformation (Fig. 1B), suggesting an s-acylation-prone structure. The electron density of an ion was observed on the inner side of the finger loop of R2 and it is thought to be Ca2+ from the crystallization buffer (Fig. 1B,C). The Ca2+ forms hydrogen bonds with water molecules and with T104 and N108 (Fig. 1C). In AnkB, these two residues are reportedly essential for recognition of regulatory peptides23. The AnkG structure was compared to the structures of AnkB in complex with its regulatory peptides: the auto-inhibitory segment (AS) and the voltage-gated Na+ channel (Nav) (Fig. 1D). The AnkG (R1-R5) structure aligns well with the first 5 ankyrin repeats of the complexed AnkB, with overall Cα-r.s.m.d.s of 0.795 Å (AnkG vs. AnkB-Nav) and 0.705 Å (AnkG vs. AnkB-AS), respectively (Fig. 1D). The loop structure showed local variation between AnkG and AnkB at the initial segment of the R2 loop (Cα-r.s.m.d.s of 2.108 Å, AnkG vs. AnkB-Nav; 2.228 Å, AnkG vs. AnkB-AS) and at the finger loops of R4 (Cα-r.s.m.d.s of 1.582 Å, AnkG vs. AnkB-Nav; 0.646 Å, AnkG vs. AnkB-AS); the association with the function was not solved.
The C121 crystal forms an oxidized dimer in which two ankyrin molecules are linked by a disulfide bond between the two Cys70 residues (Fig. 2). The R1 structures are unfolded in both molecules (Fig. 2), while the R2-R5 structures are very similar to the reduced form (Supplementary Fig. S3C,D). Ca2+ was not contained in the oxidized dimer (Fig. 2). Analytical gel filtration chromatography of AnkG showed that the two AnkG forms (oxidized/reduced) are switchable in solution (Supplementary Fig. S4B).
Although the AnkG structure is an apo-peptide, the arrangement of the side-chains in the inner groove, which interact with the regulatory peptides, show high similarity to those in complexed AnkB (Fig. 1D). The finger loop structure of R2 in AnkG, the Ca2+ binding pocket, also remained unaltered regardless of the redox condition (Supplementary Fig. S3C). We hence speculate that AnkB/G binds their binding partners with the lack of induced-fit of the structure.
MD simulations of the AnkG membrane interaction
The crystal structure alone does not provide a clear understanding of the mechanism by which AnkG associates with the membrane in terms of its dynamics or the precise structure of the interface. Therefore, to analyze the behavior of AnkG in the vicinity of the plasma membrane, we performed MD simulations using three AnkG-membrane systems. We used coarse-grained MD simulations to statistically evaluate the contribution of palmitoylation to the membrane association. Coarse-grained simulation enables us to perform long-term simulations at a lower computational cost than all-atom simulations because of fewer degrees of freedom. We first set up a simulation system involving an s-palmitoylated AnkG (R1-R5) and a lipid bilayer. The distance along the z-axis (difference between the z coordinates) of the centers of mass of the membrane and protein was 70 Å (see the Methods section for simulation details). One hundred runs of a 1-μs simulation were carried out using different initial orientations of the protein and the numbers of association events observed in these simulations were counted (Fig. 3B). The approach of AnkG to the lipid membrane was observed for all trajectories (Fig. 3B, blue cumulative line with open circles), but the ratio of trajectories in which the “contact” events were observed during the prior 10 ns (called as subtotal hereafter) was below 1.0, indicating that contacts were lost with some trajectories (Fig. 3B, blue subtotal line with filled circles). In 72 of the 100 trials, the palmitoylated AnkG was irreversibly anchored to the membrane by insertion of the acyl chain at Cys70 (Fig. 3B, red lines and Fig. S4A), but usually the palmitoylated AnkG made and lost contact with the membrane before insertion of the s-palmitoyl group (Supplementary Fig. S5A). During the simulation, the free exposure of the palmitate moiety was in a short period of time and in some case, it was sticking to the AnkG protein surface against the hydrophobic mismatch. Note that we defined each snapshot as a “contact” if the minimum distance between the membrane atoms and AnkG atoms was less than 6 Å and a trajectory with an insertion event of the s-palmitoylated AnkG was regarded as an inserted trajectory. See Materials and Methods for more details of the analysis.
The proximity of AnkG to the membrane was also analyzed by calculating the “contact probability” for each residue (Fig. 3C). The contact probabilities for the snapshots before the insertion event (Fig. 3C, red line) were low (<~0.2) and distributed randomly over residues located on the protein surface (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. S6). This suggests AnkG has no specific interaction with the membrane before anchoring. On the other hand, once a palmitoylation anchor was inserted into a membrane, only the specific residues contributing to the interaction surface had high contact probabilities, which is indicative of the importance of the palmitoylation of AnkG for stable contact with the membrane.
In 10 trials, similar contacts between non-palmitoylated AnkG and a lipid bilayer were observed. The time course of contact events is summarized in Fig. 4A. In all 10 trajectories, a non-palmitoylated AnkG moved to the membrane surface and made and lost contact with the membrane in various styles with different interfaces (Fig. 4A). But without the palmitic acyl chain, the AnkG could not anchor to the membrane or retain a specific binding interface (Fig. 4A).
Dimeric AnkG with a disulfide bond at Cys70 was also analyzed with a system expanded along the z-axis in consideration of the doubled size of the AnkG molecule (Fig. 4B). In 16 trials the dimeric AnkG moved to the membrane surface and made and lost contact in a manner similar to non-palmitoylated AnkG (Fig. 4A). Contact probabilities for interaction between each residue and the membrane in both non-palmitoylated and dimeric AnkG were low for all residues and showed a pattern similar to that observed with contact of palmitoylated AnkG (Fig. 4C), indicating non-specific contacts of the protein with the membrane. Thus s-palmitoylation was the key determinant of AnkG anchorage to the membrane via a defined binding interface, though AnkG showed a tendency to make contact with the membrane regardless of the palmitoylation.
The structure of the membrane-anchored palmitoylated AnkG (R1-R5) was examined in more detail by running a full-atom MD simulation. A major coarse-grained conformation was converted to a fine-grained (all-atom) structure using a modified backward.py script24 and the side-chain conformations were relaxed in a 5-ns simulation with position restraints on the backbone atoms (Fig. 5A). To elucidate the interactions, side-chains contributing to the membrane binding were mapped on the structure and several important residues in the loop fingers were highlighted (Fig. 5B). The overall orientation (Fig. 5A) and binding interface (Fig. 5B) indicate that the structure around the palmitoylated Cys and loop fingers of R1-R3 comprise the binding interface. This suggests the membrane association via s-palmitoylation is almost accomplished with the head region of the ankyrin repeats (R1-R5). The loop finger structures and side-chain orientation exhibit the flexibility to interact with the membrane phospholipid head groups, which was not apparent from the crystal structure (Fig. 5C). Thus AnkG orients to the membrane due to the hydrophobic insertion of the palmitoyl acyl chain into the lipid core and to the hydrophilic interactions around the loop fingers at the membrane boundary.
Discussion
In this study, we used X-ray crystallography and MD simulation to analyze the association of AnkG with a membrane via s-palmitoylation. Our crystal structure analysis highlighted some of the structural features of AnkG and its regulation. First, the AnkG structure is an apo-peptide, but shows high similarity to the peptide-binding structures of AnkB down to the side-chain arrangement in the inner groove (Fig. 1D). This is estimated to be the lack of induced-fit to peptides, suggesting low ligand-specificity, which may confer the capacity to accommodate target proteins with diverse sequences25. Second, the AnkG structure includes Ca2+ that interacts with T104 and N108 (Fig. 1C), two residues that are reportedly essential for recognition of Nav and AS, two AnkB regulatory peptides23. This suggests Ca2+ may serve as a regulatory molecule competing with Nav and AS. This is noteworthy as Ca2+ channels are concentrated in the axon initial segment (AIS)26 and it has been hypothesized that Ca2+ serves as a trigger for the activity-dependent relocation of AIS components, including AnkG and Nav27,28. Third, the two forms of the AnkG structure, oxidized and reduced, are switchable (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. S4B). Several examples of redox-regulated scaffold proteins have been reported. For example, PICK1, which controls the trafficking of various channels and receptors, switches to a dimeric form through oxidation, thereby abolishing its membrane binding capacity21. Although the redox-regulation of AnkG has not yet been demonstrated, its structure may provide clues to ankyrin’s redox-dependent regulation in physiological and pathological situations such as oxidative stress and ischemia.
Coarse-grained MD simulations showed that AnkG tends to move to the lipid membrane irrespective of its palmitoylation (Figs 3 and 4). AnkG has no specific stable contacts but stayed near the membrane surface while presenting different interfaces (Figs 3 and 4 and supplementary Fig. S6). The palmitoyltransferases DHHC5 and DHHC8 assume vital roles in AnkG palmitoylation and thus its localization at the plasma membrane14. DHHCs are membrane proteins with an active cytoplasmic catalytic domain and its catalytic center is located only about 20 residues away from the transmembrane segment. This implies they are able to palmitoylate proteins in the juxtramembrane region, which also suggests that the initial arrangement of our MD simulation with palmitoylated AnkG fits the distance from the membrane. Since the existence of free-floating palmitoylated AnkG remains incompletely understood, the process of membrane insertion is speculative. However, our simulation analysis of the palmitoylated AnkG (Fig. 3) yielded valuable information: (1) irreversibility of the membrane insertion of palmitoylated AnkG and (2) highlight of the membrane-interacting residues of palmitoylated AnkG when inserted. In addition, the membrane preference of AnkG indicated by MD simulations (Figs 3 and 4) may increase the likelihood of its palmitoylation by the DHHC membrane proteins. The protein palmitoylation event shows variable reversibility, i.e. s-palmitoylation appears rapidly reversible in cells18,29,30, while irreversible palmitoylations are also reported31,32. Palmitoylation of AnkR reportedly shows reversible nature33. Although the present study did not assess the reversibility of AnkG palmitoylation, regardless of any potential reversible nature, AnkG may be primed to accept the Cys modification in the juxtamembrane region; once that happens, AnkG becomes a rigid structural base for a membrane-excitation platform. The palmitoylation of another protein, PSD-95, reportedly arises on the Golgi or plasma membrane, depending on the trafficking of DHHC proteins and plays important roles in the activity-dependent relocalization of AMPA receptors in the neuronal synapse17,34. In that context, the subcellular spatial and temporal distribution of AnkG palmitoylation merits further study.
MD simulations also present a membrane-adherent form of palmitoylated AnkG (Fig. 5). Although the structure contained only part of the AnkG molecule (Fig. 5A), it revealed some key residues clustered on the palmitoylation plane that comprised the binding interface (Fig. 5B) and also showed a dynamic interaction between side-chains and polar headgroups of the phospholipids (Fig. 5C), which could not be observed in the frozen crystal structure. Lys105 and Lys106 in the finger loop of R2 were highlighted as the major residues interacting with the membrane (Fig. 5B,C) and are also reportedly critical residues binding with Nav35. This is noteworthy as it suggests there may be collaboration/competition between membrane anchoring and Nav tethering within axon initial segments. To obtain an image of the full-repeat orientation of AnkG along the membrane, we tried to fit the structure of AnkB (R1-R24) onto the membrane-adherent AnkG form (R1-R5) but failed due to steric hindrance from the membrane in the tail region of the repeat (R18-R24). We speculate that to achieve an ideal balance, the ankyrin repeat structure is somewhat flexible, which has been proposed previously36,37. This appears particularly important in the R5-R6 region, perhaps due to the irregular amino acid sequence (Supplementary Fig. 1). In fact, a recently reported AnkB structure (R1-R9, PDB code: #4RLY) showed an inversion of the repeat structure at the connection between R5 and R623.
A number of physiological functions derived from lipid modification of proteins have been proposed38. Understanding the structural mechanism by which these proteins associate with the membrane via lipid modification has grown increasingly important. The structural dynamics approach used in this study should be widely applicable to investigations of protein anchoring to lipid membranes. A uniform phospholipid (POPE) bilayer was used in our simulation system, while the plasma membrane consists of multiple components of lipids. Minor components of membrane lipids such as phosphoinositols and cholesterols may possibly affect the protein binding. If the membrane lipid composition in the AnkG anchoring region will become clear in the future, simulation analyses with mixed membrane lipids will generate further outcomes to understand the mechanism.
Methods
Molecular cloning
We used a rat AnkG clone (270 kDa) for all experiments in this study. DNA corresponding to the first five ankyrin repeats of the membrane binding domain (R1-R5: residues 38–200) was amplified by PCR and ligated into a pCold (Takara Bio Inc., Japan)-derived vector, in which an original cleavage site for the Factor Xa protease was replaced with a Tobacco Etch Virus (TEV) protease cleavage site. The resultant construct encodes a protein that has only two extra residues, Gly-Thr, at the N-terminus after the TEV cleavage.
Protein expression and purification
AnkG (R1-R5) proteins were expressed in E.coli [BL21(DE3)pLysS] grown in 2YT media at 16 °C and induced with 0.4 mM IPTG for 20 h. Cells were harvested by centrifugation, after which the cell pellets were lysed by sonication in lysis buffer (10 mM K2HPO4, pH 7.3, 250 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM β-ME, 1 mM PMSF) and the insoluble material was removed by centrifugation. The remaining soluble fraction, which contained His-tagged AnkG proteins, was applied to a 20 ml HisPrep FF (GE Healthcare Japan, Japan) nickel-charged column and eluted using 500 mM imidazole on an ÄKTA-purifier system (GE Healthcare Japan, Japan). After desalting the imidazole, the His-tagged proteins were cleaved using TEV protease (~300 μM for 24 h at 4 °C). AnkG proteins were collected in the flow-through from the Hisprep nickel column and extended into a superdex200 gel-filtration column (GE Healthcare Japan, Japan). The purified proteins were then further concentrated through buffer exchange using an Amicon centrifugal filter (Merck Millipore Corp., USA) to 10 mg/mL [dissolved in 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5)] and were then used for the crystallization step.
Crystallization, data collection and structure determination
AnkG (R1-R5) crystals were grown on crystal screening plates at 20 °C using sitting-drop vapor diffusion. Crystals of the reduced form of AnkG grew from 1:1 mixtures of protein solution and reservoir solution containing 50 mM CaCl2, 100 mM Bis-Tris (pH 7.0), 30% w/v PEG550 MME (Index #26, Hamptom Research, USA) (Fig. 1). Crystals of the oxidized form of AnkG grew from 1:1 mixtures of protein solution and reservoir solution containing 10 mM MgCl2-hexahydrate, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1.6 M (NH4)2SO4 (Natrix #26, Hamptom Research, USA) (Fig. 2). For data collection, the crystals were transferred to 20–25% PEG200 cryoprotectant and flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen. Data were collected at BL44XU SPring-8 (Hyogo, JAPAN), which is equipped with a MX-225HE CCD detector (Rayonix, USA) and is financially supported by Academia Sinica and the National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center (Taiwan, ROC). The crystal of the reduced form belonged to the P21212 space group and diffracted X-rays to 1.62 Å, while the crystal of the oxidized form belonged to the C121 space group and diffracted X-rays to 1.83 Å.
All data were processed using HKL2000 (HKL Research Inc., USA). The primary structure of the reduced form of ANKG (R1-R5) was solved by molecular replacement with Phaser39 using the AnkR membrane binding domain structure as a template (1N11, residues 637–791) and an initial structural model was built using the program Arp/Warp40. The initial structure was then used as a template in the molecular replacement for determination of the oxidized structure and a model was successfully built using Arp/Warp, despite the unfolded structure of the 1st repeat (Fig. 2A). The P21212 space group asymmetric unit of the reduced form contained two molecules, while the C121 space group asymmetric unit of the oxidized form contained one dimeric molecule. Model buildings were done in Coot41. We were able to assemble 158 residues in each of the two chains of the reduced form and 134 residues in each two chains in the structure of the oxidized form. All models were refined using REFMAC542 and TLS parameters were included when the oxidized structure was refined (Table 1).
The structural comparison and superposition of AnkG (40–194) and AnkB (2030–2184; PDB code #4RLV and #4RLY) were carried out using lsqkab in the CCP4 suite and the r.m.s.d. was calculated (Fig. 1D). To compare the fine-grained model structure with the crystal structure (reduced form), we superposed the helical body structures (two of the five anti-parallel α-helices) and determined the structural deviation of the loop fingers (Fig. 5). The structures of the reduced and oxidized form of AnkG were also compared in the range of residues 68–194 (Supplementary Fig. S3). The initial segment of R2 (residues 95–100), the finger loop of R4 (residues 168–175) and the finger loop of R2 (residues 100–110) were also analyzed for structural comparisons (Fig. 1D and Supplementary Fig. S3). Surface areas of the structure models were calculated using areaimol in the CCP4 suite (Supplementary Fig. S6).
Gel-filtration analysis of the redox-dependent dimerization
The molecular weights of the purified oxidized/reduced proteins were determined as described previously21,43,44. Purified AnkG (R1-R5) proteins (0.5 mg/mL) were incubated first with 100 μM H2O2 for 1 h or 4 h at 4 °C and then with 5 mM DTT for 1 h at 4 °C after the oxidation. Protein solutions (100 μL each) were then passed through a superdex200 gel-filtration column (GE Healthcare Japan, Japan) equilibrated with the loading buffer (250 mM KCl, 10 mM K2HPO4 [pH 7.3]) on an ÄKTA-purifier system (GE Healthcare Japan, Japan) at 4 °C and a flow rate of 0.5 ml min−1. Eluates were monitored at 280 nm and the molecular weights and stoichiometry of the proteins were analyzed on the basis of the elusion peaks using six standard protein molecular mass markers (GE Healthcare Japan, Japan) (Fig. 2C).
Molecular dynamics simulation
All MD simulations were performed using the GROMACS software package version 4.6.545. We performed coarse-grained MD simulations of three systems, palmitoylated-AnkG, nonpalmitoylated-AnkG and AnkG dimer, using Martini force field46,47,48 (ver. 2.2 for amino acids and ver. 2.0 for lipids and ions) to analyze the behavior of AnkG around a membrane. Force field parameters for the s-palmitoylated Cys were created by replacing the Cys side-chain atom with the palmitoyl acyl chain. All three systems consisted of a protein (AnkG), a lipid bilayer composed of 410 1-palmitoyl–2-oleoyl-phosphatidylethanolamine (POPE) molecules, water molecules and ions. The sizes of the systems were approximately 11 × 11 × 17 nm3, 11 × 11 × 17 nm3 and 11 × 11 × 20 nm3, respectively. The periodic boundary condition was applied to all simulations. By changing the protein arrangement, we prepared 100, 10 and 16 initial structures for the palmitoylated-AnkG, nonpalmitoylated-AnkG and AnkG dimer systems, respectively. Coarse-grained protein structures were constructed based on the X-ray structures using the martinize.py script and an elastic network model was combined with the Martini model to preserve their tertiary structures. The lower and upper elastic bond cut-off values were set to 0.5 and 0.9 nm, respectively and the elastic bond force constant was set to 5000 kJ.mol−1.nm−2. We minimized the energy of these systems, equilibrated them with position restraints for the backbone atoms and then performed 1-μs production runs with a time step of 25 fs in NPT ensemble (310 K, 1 bar) using the V-rescale thermostat49 and Berendsen barostat50. The electrostatic interactions were calculated using the particle mesh Ewald (PME) method51,52.
All trajectories were analyzed with an interval of 2 ns (i.e., 500 snapshots for each 1-μs simulation). We regarded a snapshot as a “contact” if the minimum distance between membrane atoms and AnkG atoms was less than 6 Å. An “Insertion event” was defined as the first time interaction between the membrane and Cys70 of AnkG was observed in three successive snapshots and trajectories with an “insertion event” were regarded as “inserted.” Contact probability between the membrane and AnkG was defined as the probability of being located in the vicinity of the lipid bilayer and the probability was calculated for each residue as the ratio of snapshots in which there was interaction between the residue and atoms in a lipid head-group; i.e., C1A, C1B, NH3 and PO4 in a Martini force field, during the trajectories after an “insertion event” or the first “contact” between AnkG and the membrane.
We also performed fine-grained (all-atom) MD simulations to analyze the interaction between the lipid bilayer and AnkG in the atomic level (Fig. 5). A typical conformation of AnkG anchoring to the POPE membrane was selected and solvated with ~3.5 k water molecules and ~150 mM NaCl in a rectangular box. The simulations were done using a periodic boundary condition and the electrostatic interactions were treated using the PME method. CHARMM36 force field53 was applied to the amino acids, lipid molecules and ions and the TIP3P model54 was applied to the water molecules. Parameters for the s-palmitoylated Cys were created by combining the force field parameters of the Cys residue in CHARMM36 with those of the palmitoyl acyl chain in the lipids. All bonds were constrained by the LINCS algorithm55. We did the energy minimization of the entire system and then gradually increased the system’s temperature using the V-rescale thermostat with position restraints for heavy atoms in the protein. A 5-ns production run with a time step of 2 fs in the NPT ensemble was performed with position restraints for backbone atoms in the protein to relax the side-chain conformations. The temperature and pressure of the system were controlled at 310 K and 1 bar using a Nose-Hoover thermostat56,57 and Parrinello-Rahman barostat58,59, respectively.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Fujiwara, Y. et al. Structural basis for the membrane association of ankyrinG via palmitoylation. Sci. Rep. 6, 23981; doi: 10.1038/srep23981 (2016).
References
Bennett, V. & Lorenzo, D. N. Spectrin- and ankyrin-based membrane domains and the evolution of vertebrates. Curr Top Membr 72, 1–37, 10.1016/B978-0-12-417027-8.00001-5 (2013).
Zhou, D. et al. AnkyrinG is required for clustering of voltage-gated Na channels at axon initial segments and for normal action potential firing. J Cell Biol 143, 1295–1304 (1998).
Jenkins, S. M. & Bennett, V. Developing nodes of Ranvier are defined by ankyrin-G clustering and are independent of paranodal axoglial adhesion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 2303–2308, 10.1073/pnas.042601799 (2002).
Pan, Z. et al. A Common Ankyrin-G-Based Mechanism Retains KCNQ and NaV Channels at Electrically Active Domains of the Axon. Journal of Neuroscience 26, 2599–2613, 10.1523/jneurosci.4314-05.2006 (2006).
Kizhatil, K., Baker, S. A., Arshavsky, V. Y. & Bennett, V. Ankyrin-G promotes cyclic nucleotide-gated channel transport to rod photoreceptor sensory cilia. Science 323, 1614–1617, 10.1126/science.1169789 (2009).
Ayalon, G., Davis, J. Q., Scotland, P. B. & Bennett, V. An ankyrin-based mechanism for functional organization of dystrophin and dystroglycan. Cell 135, 1189–1200, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.10.018 (2008).
Makara, M. A. et al. Ankyrin-G coordinates intercalated disc signaling platform to regulate cardiac excitability in vivo. Circ Res 115, 929–938, 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.305154 (2014).
Mohler, P. J. et al. Nav1.5 E1053K mutation causing Brugada syndrome blocks binding to ankyrin-G and expression of Nav1.5 on the surface of cardiomyocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101, 17533–17538, 10.1073/pnas.0403711101 (2004).
Ferreira, M. A. et al. Collaborative genome-wide association analysis supports a role for ANK3 and CACNA1C in bipolar disorder. Nat Genet 40, 1056–1058, 10.1038/ng.209 (2008).
Iqbal, Z. et al. Homozygous and heterozygous disruptions of ANK3: at the crossroads of neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders. Hum Mol Genet 22, 1960–1970, 10.1093/hmg/ddt043 (2013).
Boiko, T. et al. Ankyrin-Dependent and -Independent Mechanisms Orchestrate Axonal Compartmentalization of L1 Family Members Neurofascin and L1/Neuron-Glia Cell Adhesion Molecule. Journal of Neuroscience 27, 590–603, 10.1523/jneurosci.4302-06.2007 (2007).
Dzhashiashvili, Y. et al. Nodes of Ranvier and axon initial segments are ankyrin G-dependent domains that assemble by distinct mechanisms. The Journal of Cell Biology 177, 857–870, 10.1083/jcb.200612012 (2007).
Hedstrom, K. L. et al. Neurofascin assembles a specialized extracellular matrix at the axon initial segment. The Journal of Cell Biology 178, 875–886, 10.1083/jcb.200705119 (2007).
He, M., Abdi, K. M. & Bennett, V. Ankyrin-G palmitoylation and betaII-spectrin binding to phosphoinositide lipids drive lateral membrane assembly. J Cell Biol 206, 273–288, 10.1083/jcb.201401016 (2014).
He, M., Jenkins, P. & Bennett, V. Cysteine 70 of ankyrin-G is S-palmitoylated and is required for function of ankyrin-G in membrane domain assembly. The Journal of biological chemistry 287, 43995–44005, 10.1074/jbc.M112.417501 (2012).
Dejanovic, B. et al. Palmitoylation of gephyrin controls receptor clustering and plasticity of GABAergic synapses. Plos Biol 12, e1001908, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001908 (2014).
Dalva, M. B. Neuronal activity moves protein palmitoylation into the synapse. The Journal of Cell Biology 186, 7–9, 10.1083/jcb.200906101 (2009).
Fukata, Y. et al. Local palmitoylation cycles define activity-regulated postsynaptic subdomains. The Journal of Cell Biology 202, 145–161, 10.1083/jcb.201302071 (2013).
Ho, G. P. et al. S-nitrosylation and S-palmitoylation reciprocally regulate synaptic targeting of PSD-95. Neuron 71, 131–141, 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.033 (2011).
Linder, M. E. & Deschenes, R. J. Palmitoylation: policing protein stability and traffic. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 8, 74–84, 10.1038/nrm2084 (2007).
Shi, Y. et al. Redox-regulated lipid membrane binding of the PICK1 PDZ domain. Biochemistry 49, 4432–4439, 10.1021/bi100269t (2010).
Michaely, P., Tomchick, D. R., Machius, M. & Anderson, R. G. Crystal structure of a 12 ANK repeat stack from human ankyrinR. EMBO J 21, 6387–6396 (2002).
Wang, C. et al. Structural basis of diverse membrane target recognitions by ankyrins. Elife 3, e04353, 10.7554/eLife.04353 (2014).
Wassenaar, T. A., Pluhackova, K., Böckmann, R. A., Marrink, S. J. & Tieleman, D. P. Going Backward: A Flexible Geometric Approach to Reverse Transformation from Coarse Grained to Atomistic Models. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 10, 676–690, 10.1021/ct400617g (2014).
Bennett, V. & Chen, L. Ankyrins and cellular targeting of diverse membrane proteins to physiological sites. Current Opinion in Cell Biology 13, 61–67, 10.1016/s0955-0674(00)00175-7 (2001).
Bender, K. J. & Trussell, L. O. Axon initial segment Ca2+ channels influence action potential generation and timing. Neuron 61, 259–271, 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.12.004 (2009).
Grubb, M. S. & Burrone, J. Activity-dependent relocation of the axon initial segment fine-tunes neuronal excitability. Nature 465, 1070–1074, 10.1038/nature09160 (2010).
Kuba, H., Oichi, Y. & Ohmori, H. Presynaptic activity regulates Na(+) channel distribution at the axon initial segment. Nature 465, 1075–1078, 10.1038/nature09087 (2010).
Martin, B. R., Wang, C., Adibekian, A., Tully, S. E. & Cravatt, B. F. Global profiling of dynamic protein palmitoylation. Nature Methods 9, 84–89, 10.1038/nmeth.1769 (2011).
Rocks, O. et al. The Palmitoylation Machinery Is a Spatially Organizing System for Peripheral Membrane Proteins. Cell 141, 458–471, 10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.007 (2010).
Kang, R. et al. Neural palmitoyl-proteomics reveals dynamic synaptic palmitoylation. Nature 456, 904–909, 10.1038/nature07605 (2008).
Parat, M. O. & Fox, P. L. Palmitoylation of caveolin-1 in endothelial cells is post-translational but irreversible. The Journal of biological chemistry 276, 15776–15782, 10.1074/jbc.M006722200 (2001).
Staufenbiel, M. Ankyrin-bound fatty acid turns over rapidly at the erythrocyte plasma membrane. Molecular and cellular biology 7, 2981–2984 (1987).
Yokoi, N., Fukata, M. & Fukata, Y. Synaptic Plasticity Regulated by Protein–Protein Interactions and Posttranslational Modifications. 297, 1–43, 10.1016/b978-0-12-394308-8.00001-7 (2012).
Xu, M. & Cooper, E. C. An Ankyrin-G N-terminal Gate and Protein Kinase CK2 Dually Regulate Binding of Voltage-gated Sodium and KCNQ2/3 Potassium Channels. Journal of Biological Chemistry 290, 16619–16632, 10.1074/jbc.M115.638932 (2015).
Cheng, C. Y., Jarymowycz, V. A., Cortajarena, A. L., Regan, L. & Stone, M. J. Repeat Motions and Backbone Flexibility in Designed Proteins with Different Numbers of Identical Consensus Tetratricopeptide Repeats†. Biochemistry 45, 12175–12183, 10.1021/bi060819a (2006).
Lee, G. et al. Nanospring behaviour of ankyrin repeats. Nature 440, 246–249, 10.1038/nature04437 (2006).
Resh, M. D. Fatty acylation of proteins: new insights into membrane targeting of myristoylated and palmitoylated proteins. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 1451, 1–16, 10.1016/s0167-4889(99)00075-0 (1999).
Storoni, L. C., McCoy, A. J. & Read, R. J. Likelihood-enhanced fast rotation functions. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 60, 432–438 (2004).
Perrakis, A., Morris, R. & Lamzin, V. S. Automated protein model building combined with iterative structure refinement. Nat Struct Biol 6, 458–463 (1999).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 486–501 (2010).
Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A. & Dodson, E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 53, 240–255 (1997).
Fujiwara, Y. et al. Gating of the designed trimeric/tetrameric voltage-gated H+ channel. The Journal of physiology 591, 627–640, 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.243006 (2013).
Fujiwara, Y., Takeshita, K., Nakagawa, A. & Okamura, Y. Structural characteristics of the redox-sensing coiled coil in the voltage-gated H+ channel. The Journal of biological chemistry 288, 17968–17975, 10.1074/jbc.M113.459024 (2013).
Hess, B., Kutzner, C., van der Spoel, D. & Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced and Scalable Molecular Simulation. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 4, 435–447, 10.1021/ct700301q (2008).
Marrink, S. J., de Vries, A. H. & Mark, A. E. Coarse Grained Model for Semiquantitative Lipid Simulations. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 108, 750–760, 10.1021/jp036508g (2004).
Monticelli, L. et al. The MARTINI Coarse-Grained Force Field: Extension to Proteins. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 4, 819–834, 10.1021/ct700324x (2008).
de Jong, D. H. et al. Improved Parameters for the Martini Coarse-Grained Protein Force Field. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 9, 687–697, 10.1021/ct300646g (2013).
Bussi, G., Donadio, D. & Parrinello, M. Canonical sampling through velocity rescaling. The Journal of Chemical Physics 126, 014101, 10.1063/1.2408420 (2007).
Berendsen, H. J. C., Postma, J. P. M., van Gunsteren, W. F., DiNola, A. & Haak, J. R. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. The Journal of Chemical Physics 81, 3684–3690, 10.1063/1.448118 (1984).
Darden, T., York, D. & Pedersen, L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics 98, 10089–10092, 10.1063/1.464397 (1993).
Essmann, U. et al. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. The Journal of Chemical Physics 103, 8577–8593, 10.1063/1.470117 (1995).
Klauda, J. B. et al. Update of the CHARMM All-Atom Additive Force Field for Lipids: Validation on Six Lipid Types. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 114, 7830–7843, 10.1021/jp101759q (2010).
Jorgensen, W. L., Chandrasekhar, J., Madura, J. D., Impey, R. W. & Klein, M. L. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. The Journal of Chemical Physics 79, 926–935, 10.1063/1.445869 (1983).
Hess, B., Bekker, H., Berendsen, H. J. C. & Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: A linear constraint solver for molecular simulations. Journal of Computational Chemistry 18, 1463–1472, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199709)18:12 < 1463::AID-JCC4 > 3.0.CO; 2-H (1997).
Hoover, W. G. Canonical dynamics: Equilibrium phase-space distributions. Physical Review A 31, 1695–1697 (1985).
Nosé, S. A molecular dynamics method for simulations in the canonical ensemble. Molecular Physics 52, 255–268, 10.1080/00268978400101201 (1984).
Parrinello, M. & Rahman, A. Polymorphic transitions in single crystals: A new molecular dynamics method. Journal of Applied Physics 52, 7182–7190, 10.1063/1.328693 (1981).
Nosé, S. & Klein, M. L. Constant pressure molecular dynamics for molecular systems. Molecular Physics 50, 1055–1076, 10.1080/00268978300102851 (1983).
Acknowledgements
Rat Ankyrin-G clone was kindly gifted from Dr. Vann Bennett (Duke Univ.). This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI #24689012) and grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation and the Takeda Science Foundation to Y.F. and also by a “HD-Physiology” Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (KAKENHI #22136005) to K.K. This work was partially supported by the Platform for Drug Discovery, Informatics and Structural Life Science to K.K. from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan. This work is supported by CREST, JST and PRESTO, JST.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.F., H.X.K., M.S. and K.K. designed the experiments; Y.F. and M.K. performed the crystal structure analysis and the protein biochemical analysis; K.T. and A.N. assisted with crystallization and the beamline experiments; H.X.K., M.S. and K.K. performed the molecular dynamics simulation analysis; Y.O. supported the conduction of research from a neuroscience view; Y.F., H.X.K., M.S. and K.K. wrote the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Fujiwara, Y., Kondo, H., Shirota, M. et al. Structural basis for the membrane association of ankyrinG via palmitoylation. Sci Rep 6, 23981 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23981
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23981
This article is cited by
-
Roles and mechanisms of ankyrin-G in neuropsychiatric disorders
Experimental & Molecular Medicine (2022)
-
Roles of palmitoylation in structural long-term synaptic plasticity
Molecular Brain (2021)
-
Coronavirus envelope protein: current knowledge
Virology Journal (2019)
-
Structure of the thermo-sensitive TRP channel TRP1 from the alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Nature Communications (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.