Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

High C3 photosynthetic capacity and high intrinsic water use efficiency underlies the high productivity of the bioenergy grass Arundo donax

Abstract

Arundo donax has attracted interest as a potential bioenergy crop due to a high apparent productivity. It uses C3 photosynthesis yet appears competitive with C4 grass biomass feedstock’s and grows in warm conditions where C4 species might be expected to be that productive. Despite this there has been no systematic study of leaf photosynthetic properties. This study determines photosynthetic and photorespiratory parameters for leaves in a natural stand of A. donax growing in southern Portugal. We hypothesise that A. donax has a high photosynthetic potential in high and low light, stomatal limitation to be small and intrinsic water use efficiency unusually low. High photosynthetic rates in A. donax resulted from a high capacity for both maximum Rubisco (Vc,max 117 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) and ribulose-1:5-bisphosphate limited carboxylation rate (Jmax 213 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1) under light-saturated conditions. Maximum quantum yield for light-limited CO2 assimilation was also high relative to other C3 species. Photorespiratory losses were similar to other C3 species under the conditions of measurement (25%), while stomatal limitation was high (0.25) resulting in a high intrinsic water use efficiency. Overall the photosynthetic capacity of A. donax is high compared to other C3 species and comparable to C4 bioenergy grasses.

Introduction

Giant reed (Arundo donax L.) has attracted interest as a potential bioenergy crop, due to a high apparent productivity and suitability as an accepted feedstock for cellulosic fuel production1. It is found throughout the Mediterranean climate zones of the world and has been cultivated in Asia, southern Europe and North Africa for over a thousand years. It is a rhizomatous perennial herbaceous grass that produces stems of ca. 2–3 cm diameter that may grow to heights of 3–6 m. It is found in moist grasslands and wetlands although it is able to thrive across a wide range of soil types, while also being tolerant of mild drought and salinity and is tolerant of water-logged soils2,3,4. In climates with warm winters it is evergreen but dies back in climates with freezing winter temperatures. Although there are related species within the genus, molecular analysis suggests that A. donax is monophyletic in origin and its spread has not involved hybridisation with the related species. These analyses also suggest that it originated in west Asia and then spread to the Mediterranean region5. The high productivity of A. donax is achieved in warm growing conditions despite the fact that it uses C3 photosynthesis, which might be expected to be a competitive disadvantage compared to C4 species under such growing conditions.

Side-by-side trials in central Italy over 11 years showed an average yield of above-ground dry biomass of 28.7 t ha−1 yr−1 for the highly productive C4 perennial grass Miscanthus x giganteus Deu et Greef, but 37.7 t ha−1 yr−1 for A. donax6. Although this appears a relatively low yield for M. x giganteus under irrigated conditions in the Mediterranean7, the reported yield for A. donax is high by any measure. A. donax in central and southern Italy showed average dry matter yield over 3 years of up to 74 t ha−1 yr−1, which exceeds the highest yields reported for M. x giganteus8. Similarly, in a multi-year study in Alabama A. donax achieved an average yield of 35.5 t ha−1 yr−1 compared to 23.5 t ha−1 yr−1 for switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)9. In a comparison with C4 sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) in northern Italy, light penetration into an A. donax canopy studied over a three year period was found to be 60% higher and the efficiency of conversion of intercepted radiation into biomass was ca. 60% higher. This might be explained by its more effective distribution of light through the canopy, if it is coupled with a similar efficiency of leaf photosynthesis10,11. However, yields may be considerably lower on marginal land. On a sandy loam with limited nutrient availability A. donax required three years to accumulate 20 t ha−1 and build a rhizome mass of 16 t ha−1 4, by contrast to M. x giganteus which has proved significantly more productive on marginal sites12. While M. x giganteus was found particularly vulnerable to damage by water-logging of soils during autumn and winter, A. donax appeared to thrive in these situations. This tolerance of water-logging also allows A. donax to spread along watercourses from rhizome fragments where M. x giganteus cannot13. Its ability to survive anaerobic soil may explain its ability to tolerate high levels of reduced ions of heavy metals14. A. donax is clearly a resilient, but also very productive species. However, there is little fundamental knowledge available on how it is able to realise this productivity. Understanding this demands knowledge of leaf photosynthesis as well as canopy microclimate.

Leaf photosynthetic rates of CO2 uptake (A) measured in A. donax growing on an estuary in S. Africa were between 20 and 37 μmol m−2 s−1 15. By combining modulated chlorophyll fluorescence and gas exchange, photorespiration was estimated to decrease A by 30%. Although water potential declined to −2.1 MPa around noon on sunny days, stomatal conductance (gs) and A changed little. Such low leaf water potential would normally be expected to at least cause partial stomatal closure in most species15. The rates of stomatal conductance reported are at the upper end of those found in other C3 species but not much greater than those of the productive C4 bioenergy grasses M. x giganteus and P. virgatum, as well as productive modern cultivars of maize (Zea mays L.)16,17.

In summary, A. donax achieves and exceeds the productivities normally associated with C4 perennial grasses in warm climates. For a plant which forms a high leaf area index (LAI) monocultures in nature and as a crop, it would be expected to have a high photosynthetic capacity at both high and low light intensity under warm conditions. The high photosynthetic capacity is needed in the context of a dense canopy where shaded leaves need to achieve high efficiency, as well as those in full sun and where all leaves need to be efficient under the low light conditions of dawn, dusk and cloudy days. Yet it is a C3 species, growing in warm conditions where only a C4 species might be expected to be photosynthetically efficient18. The limited published data suggests that A. donax may indeed have high light-saturated leaf photosynthetic rates, which may also be supported by high leaf conductances. High leaf conductances will allow a higher CO2 concentration at ribulose-1:5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), so increasing the rate of carboxylation and decreasing photorespiration, but at the expense of water loss and water use efficiency19.

To better define the photosynthetic capacity of A. donax and understand how this may explain its high productivity this study aimed to define key in vivo properties. These were: Jmax, the maximum whole chain electron transport rate supporting ribulose-1:5-bisphosphate (RuBP) regeneration, Vc,max the maximum rate of carboxylation that can be supported by Rubisco, the light-saturated rate of CO2 assimilation (Asat) and the maximum quantum yield of CO2 assimilation (ΦCO2,max) defined by the initial slope of the response of A to absorbed photon flux (αI). Concurrent measurement of water vapour flux and modulated chlorophyll fluorescence were used to determine gs, stomatal limitation to CO2 uptake (l), intercellular CO2 concentration (ci) and the whole chain electron transport rate (J). These parameters were determined for leaves in a natural stand of A. donax growing in a dry valley in S. Portugal. These are used to test the hypotheses that A. donax has a high photosynthetic potential in both high and low light, that stomatal limitation may be unusually small and thus intrinsic leaf water use efficiency poor. The in vivo measures: Jmax, Vc,max, Asat and ΦCO2,max, are key to parameterization of the steady-state biochemical model of C3 photosynthesis20 which underlies most models of crop and ecosystem productivity21. This study therefore also serves as a key resource for parameterizing production models of this emerging crop.

Materials and Methods

Field location

The study was undertaken on a naturally occurring A. donax stand located at Quinta de São Pedro - Centro de estudos (Armadas, 2815–786 Sobreda, Portugal 38°38′40.6″N 9°11′34.5″W, altitude 85 m). A mixed 5 acre site with a disturbed dry valley community of annuals, patches of native macchia and scrub, pine woodland, introduced Acacia woodland and a few planted ornamentals on a Cambisol soils22.

Meteorological assessment

Relative humidity, air temperature and irradiance were measured over the sampling period using a Weather Station (WS-GP2 with GP2 Data Logger, Delta-T Devices Ltd, Cambridge, UK) (Fig. S1). Relative Humidity and air temperature were used to calculate vapour pressure deficit (VPD), as a virtual channel within the GP2. Soil temperature and soil water content were measured within the stand over the sampling period using soil moisture sensors (SM300 with GP2 Data Logger, Delta-T Devices Ltd, Cambridge, UK).

Stomatal Conductance and In situ Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Measurements of stomatal conductance were made with a diffusion porometer (AP4, Delta-T Devices Ltd, Cambridge, UK). All measurements of conductance and photosynthesis were made on the most recently expanded leaf, as judged by ligule emergences. Readings were taken on several leaves, locating the porometer at three points along each leaf: 1) the base just above the ligule, 2) the midpoint between ligule to tip; and 3) the area just below the leaf tip. Both the adaxial and abaxial surfaces were measured at these points at midday and mid-afternoon following the procedures of Monteith23 and Potter24. Modulated chlorophyll fluorescence was monitored to estimate the operating efficiency of PSII (Fq′/Fm′)25,26 on fully emerged leaves at midday and late afternoon using a fluorometer (MONITORING-PAM, Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany) (Fig. S1).

Photosynthetic intercellular-CO2 response curves

Leaves were sampled pre-dawn from the A. donax stand. Leaves were excised just above the ligule and immediately re-cut under water and then kept in cool low-light conditions (20 °C and 20 μmol m−2 s−2) until use. The response of net leaf CO2 uptake rate (A) to external CO2 concentration (ca) was assessed on five different leaves. Leaves were placed in the leaf cuvette of a portable open gas exchange system (LCPro-SD with 6.25 cm2 cuvette; ADC BioScientific Ltd. Herts, England; or LI6400XT with 6 cm2 cuvette; LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA). Air temperature was controlled at 25 oC, leaf temperature 27 oC and VPD at 0.96 kPa. To fully induce photosynthesis before measurements commenced, leaves were first allowed to equilibrate at a photon flux (I) of 500 μmol m−2 s−1 and reference ca of 400 μmol mol−1 until A had reached a stable value, the I was then increase to 1500 μmol m−2 s−1. When A had reached a stable value at I = 1500 μmol m−2 s−1 ca was then changed to the following levels in sequence, 300, 250, 200, 150, 100, 50, 400, 600, 900, 1200 and 1500 μmol mol−1. The leaf remained at each level until a stable A could be determined. Potential Rubisco carboxylation (Vc,max) and electron transport through photosystem II (Jmax) were determined from the responses of Asat to ci. For each leaf values of A located above the transition between Rubisco-limited and RuBP- or electron transport-limited photosynthesis in the A/ci response were used to solve for Jmax using the equations representing RuBP regeneration-limited A20. Values were temperature adjusted to 25 oC using the temperature response equations of Bernacchi et al. (2001)27 for the Rubisco-limited and Bernacchi et al. (2003)28 for the RuBP regeneration limited portions of the A vs ci curves. Stomatal limitation (l) at the current ambient ca of 400 μmol mol−1 was derived using the method outlined in Long and Bernacchi (2003)29.

Photosynthetic light response curves

Sampling and measurements of A vs. I were performed in parallel with A vs. ci curves. Leaves were placed in the leaf cuvette of an integrated open gas exchange system and modulated chlorophyll fluorometer (GFS-3000FL, LED-Array/PAM-Fluorometer 3055-FL and 3080-O2 Oxygen sensor. Heinz Walz GmbH, Effeltrich, Germany). Leaves were adapted to an incident photon flux of 1500 μmol m−2 s−1 prior to measurements with the [CO2] at 400 μmol mol−1 and leaf temperature controlled at 25 oC. The VPD of the air entering the gas exchange system was maintained between 0.8 and 1.1 kPa. Photosynthetic light response curves were then obtained at ambient (21%) and low (2%) oxygen concentrations. Photon flux was varied in a step-wise manner, either starting from the photon flux at which photosynthesis had been induced, after a steady-state A was obtained or alternating between different photon fluxes, in each case waiting for a steady-state to be obtained. Photon flux levels were 2000, 1500, 1000, 700, 500, 350, 250, 150, 75, 45 μmol m−2 s−1. At each light level, once a new steady state was reached gas exchange rates were recorded. Simultaneously, Fq′/Fm′ was determined via modulated chlorophyll fluorescence and application of a saturating flash as previously described25,26,30.

The light response of CO2 assimilation rate is described by a four-parameter non-rectangular hyperbola, according to Marshall and Biscoe31:

where A is the CO2 assimilation rate (μmol m−2 s−1), Φmax is the apparent maximum quantum yield (mol CO2 (mol photons)−1), I is the incident photon flux (μmol m−2 s−1), Asat is the CO2 assimilation rate at saturating photon flux (μmol m−2 s−1), θ is the curve convexity (dimensionless) and Rd is mitochondrial respiration in the light (μmol m−2 s−1). The light compensation point (LCP) was determined as the incident photon flux (I) where A = 0 as predicted from the fitted curve.

The quantum yield of CO2 assimilation, ΦCO2, was determined according to Genty30:

where A is corrected for respiratory loss (Rd) and divided by the absorbed photon flux (αI), with α as the leaf absorbance. The method used to determine absorbance under the chamber lighting conditions is described later.

The parameters ΦCO2 and Fq′/Fm′ have been shown to be linearly related under conditions where photorespiration is suppressed30,32,33. Under ambient (21%) and low (2%) oxygen atmosphere, the relationship can be used to assess the possible operation of electron acceptors other than CO2, e.g. photorespiration or active oxygen production, which are manifest as an increased Fq′/Fm′ relative to its corresponding ΦCO234.

The relation of the quantum yield of CO2 assimilation (ФCO2) after Valentini35 to the operating efficiency of PSII (Fq′/Fm′) under non-photorespiratory conditions can be described as a linear relationship30, where b is the y axis intercept and k is the slope of the relationship between Fq′/Fm′ and ФCO2:

Assuming 4 electrons are necessary for the fixation of a CO2 molecule, this can be expressed as:

where Φe− is the quantum yield of total electron flow, which can be rewritten as:

This relationship is assumed to hold in the presence and in the absence of photorespiration, where in the presence of photorespiration it can be used to calculate the total electron flow, which is the sum of electron flow to the reactions of carboxylation (JC) and oxygenation (JO)35:

JC can be calculated by assuming 4 electrons are needed per CO2 for carboxylation:

where Rp is the amount of CO2 released by photorespiration. JO can be calculated by assuming that 8 electrons are needed per CO2 released in photorespiration:

Combining the equations for JT, JC and JO then gives:

Leaf transmission and reflectance

Immediately following completion of the gas exchange measurements leaf absorbance (α) was measured from 400 to 700 nm, with a dual-channel spectrometer and integrating spheres (SpectroClip-JAZ-TR, Ocean Optics, Oxford, UK). Six spectral measurements of leaf transmittance and reflectance were made per leaf. The average transmittance (τ) and reflectance (R) for each leaf was used to determine α = (1 − R − τ). Total absorbance for the PAR spectrum was calculated. Total absorbed light was also calculated by combining the percentage of actinic light emitted by the blue (470 nm) and red (640 nm) LEDs in the leaf gas exchange chamber with α for the peak wavelength of the two LED types36. The apparent maximum quantum yield (Φmax) was then recalculated to give the maximum absolute quantum yield, i.e. the net number of CO2 molecules absorbed by the leaf per photon absorbed:

Intrinsic leaf water use efficiency

Intrinsic leaf water use efficiency (LWUE) was calculated from gas exchange of CO2 and H2O as the ratio of CO2 assimilation (A) over stomatal conductance (gs) under 21% O2 at photon fluxes of 1000 and 2000 μmol m−2 s−1. Contrary to the water use efficiency calculated from A over transpiration (E)37, A/gs is considered to be more realistic and comparable between studies, as it is not influenced by changes in leaf to air VPD in the leaf chamber38.

Results

The light response of A. donax for A at high and low O2 showed an increase of A when O2 was lowered, compared to that at 21% O2, indicating the reduction of A in air due to photorespiration (Fig. 1a). At both O2 concentrations, A did not reach a plateau, even at high photon flux. Both the light response of gs and ci were lowered when O2 concentration was reduced (Fig. 1b). The response of gs to light largely scaled with A, while ci reached a plateau above a photon flux of 600 μmol m−2 s−1. From the response of A to light, parameters were derived (Table 1). The CO2 assimilation rate at saturating photon flux (Asat) was remarkably high at both ambient (30.19 +/−0.32 μmol m−2 s−1) and low O2 concentration (34.86 +/−1.2 μmol m−2 s−1) whereas the predicted values of A at infinite photon flux density as described by the fitted hyperbola were 38.11 +/−0.56 μmol m−2 s−1 at ambient O2 and 43.45 +/−2.08 μmol m−2 s−1 at low O2 concentration. The maximum quantum yield of CO2 assimilation (ΦCO2,max) at ambient and low O2 level was found to be 0.056 (+/−0.0029) and 0.072 (+/−0.0045) respectively, mol CO2 (mol absorbed photons)α1. The intrinsic leaf water use efficiency (A/gs) (LWUE) was 62.9 (+/−2.38) μmol mol−1 at sub-saturating photon flux (1000 μmol m−2 s−1) and 66.0 (+/−1.97) μmol mol−1 at near-saturating photon flux (2000 μmol m−2 s−1).

Table 1 Parameters derived from photosynthetic light response curves calculated with incident (I) and absorbed photon flux (αI); replication and conditions of measurement as given in Fig. 1.
Figure 1
figure1

(a) Light response of assimilation rate for fully emerged A. donax leaves measured at 21% oxygen (closed symbols) and 2% oxygen (open symbols). (b) ci (triangle) and gs (square) at a ca of 400 μmol mol−1, leaf temperature of 25 °C and VPD of between 0.8 and 1.1 kPa (values are means and standard errors, for 5 different plants).

Under 21% O2, the electron flow to oxygenation reactions of Rubisco (JO) and the rate of CO2 production by photorespiration (Rp) increased with photon flux, until a plateau was reached at a photon flux of 1000 μmol m−2 s−1 (Fig. 2.). However, the electron flow to carboxylation (JC) increased further with increasing photon flux and did not appear to reach a plateau (Fig. 2). It was estimated that ca. 25% of electron flow is accounted for by JO under saturating light intensity. The ratio of CO2 production by photorespiration, Rp, to assimilation (Asat) was 0.216.

Figure 2
figure2

Electron flow to the reaction of carboxylation (JC) (open circle) and oxygenation (JO) (closed circle) and the rate of CO2 production by photorespiration (Rp) (closed triangle) for fully emerged A. donax leaves.

Values are corrected for leaf absorbance, 0.89 (±4.47 × 10−3) and are calculated from light response of assimilation rate at a ca of 400 μmol mol−1, leaf temperature of 25 °C and VPD of between 0.8 and 1.1 kPa. (Values are means and standard errors, for 5 different plants).

Total leaf absorbance from 400 nm to 700 nm was 0.87 (+/− 4.0 × 10−3, n = 6). Total leaf absorbance at the peak emitting wavelengths of red (640 nm) and blue (470 nm) was 0.89 (S.E. +/4.47 × 10−3, n = 6) and used to calculate Fq′/Fm′ against the quantum yield of CO2 assimilation (ФCO2) on an absorbed light basis. The relation between Fq/Fm′ and ФCO2 under high and low O2 showed significant positive correlations (Fig. 3). The difference in slope of the relation, representing the apparent electron demand to assimilate one CO2, at ambient and low O2 concentration can be attributed to the presence or absence of photorespiration.

Figure 3
figure3

Relationship between operating efficiency of PSII (Fq′/Fm′) and quantum yield of CO2 assimilation (ФCO2) for A. donax calculated from light response of assimilation rate, measured at 21% oxygen (closed circle) and 2% oxygen (open circle) and both at a ca of 400 μmol mol−1, leaf temperature of 25 °C and VPD of between 0.8 and 1.1 kPa.

Values are corrected for leaf absorbance, 0.89 (±4.47 × 10−3), (values are means and standard errors, for 5 different plants).

The response of A to ci for A. donax leaves at saturating light intensity was determined at ambient O2 concentration (Fig. 4). Subsequently, parameters were derived to describe the A/ci response and the stomatal limitation (Table 2). The maximum velocity of carboxylation by Rubisco (Vc,max), was 117.8 μmol m−2 s−1 and the maximum rate of electron transport (Jmax) was 213.7 μmol m−2 s−1. The CO2 compensation point, Γ, was 44.2 μmol mol−1 and the limitation to A imposed by stomata and leaf boundary layer, l, was 0.25 (Table 2).

Table 2 Parameters derived from photosynthetic intracellular CO2 (ci) response curves; replication and conditions of measurement as given in Fig. 4.
Figure 4
figure4

A vs ci response for A. donax.

A′; the supply function of the estimated limitation placed on A by the stomata and leaf boundary layer; A′′ the supply function in the absence of any limitation to diffusion of CO2 from the atmosphere to the site of carboxylation. Observations were measured at 21% oxygen on fully emerged leaves at a I of 1500 μmol m−2 s−1, leaf temperature of 25 °C and VPD of 0.96 (0.01) kPa and gs 0.404 (0.016) mol m−2 s−1. (Values are means and standard errors, for 5 different plants).

Soil water content between 20 cm and 40 cm soil depth averaged 0.14 m3 m−3 (+/− 0.01) across the sampling area over the sampling period, with an average soil temperature of 21 oC (+/− 0.9). Stomatal conductance of A. donax, measured on ad- and abaxial surfaces of leaves on three different positions along the leaf blade, were highest at noon (12:00) and declined in the afternoon (16:00, Table 3). The highest stomatal conductance was observed in the middle of the leaf at both time points and both surfaces. The greatest decline in stomatal conductance between noon and afternoon was observed in the middle of the leaf, on both adaxial and abaxial surfaces (Table 3). Even though there was a great decline in stomatal conductance, the operating efficiency of PSII (Fq/Fm′) at noon and in the afternoon in the field did not decrease as much (Table 3). This implies that stomatal conductance was still not greatly limiting for photosynthesis during the afternoon.

Table 3 Stomatal conductance (mmol m2 s¹) at mid and late afternoon, on abaxial and adaxial leaf surfaces with measurements along the leaf surface from the stem to the leaf tip.

Discussion

Light-saturated capacity for photosynthetic CO2 uptake is determined by the maximum rate of carboxylation (Vc,max) and the maximum rate of electron transport, (Jmax), depending on the inter-cellular CO2 concentration (ci)20. Averaged across 109 C3 species, Vc,max was 64 μmol m−2 s−1 and Jmax 134 μmol m−2 s−1 39, this compares to values found here for A. donax of 117.8 and 213.7 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1, respectively, which are almost double the C3 average. These values are for a natural and unfertilized stand. Typically in C3 crops these values will increase with nitrogen status40. However, the values found here for A. donax are high even compared to fertilized or N-fixing productive crops: Phalaris arundinacae (83.9 and 150.6 μmol m−2 s−1)41, Triticum aestivum (59 and 139 μmol m−2 s−1)40, Oryza sativa (91 and 190 μmol m−2 s−1 42, Helianthus annuus (29 and Heinz walz μmol m−2 s−1)43, Glycine max (83 and 160 μmol m−2 s−1)44 and Phaseolus vulgaris (88 and 178 μmol m−2 s−1)45. This highlights the high light-saturated maximum photosynthetic capacity of A. donax. Compared to other tall grass species considered as bioenergy sources, A. donax shows high A in full sunlight. Figure 1 shows an average A of 30.2 μmol m−2 s−1 at 25 °C, this compares to values at this temperature of 28 μmol m−2 s−1 for M. x giganteus46, 24 μmol m−2 s−1 in field grown stands of Panicum virgatum (switchgrass)16 and 22 μmol m−2 s−1 for the C3 bioenergy grass, Phalaris arundinacea (Reed canary grass)47.

Is this A achieved by lower losses to photorespiration in A. donax? If we assume “average” Rubisco kinetic properties as described by Brooks and Farquhar48 for spinach, then the CO2 photosynthetic compensation point (Γ*) would be 42.5 μmol mol−1 at 25 °C. Using this value, with the measured dark respiratory rate (Rd) of 2 μmol m−2 s−1, average A of 30.19 μmol m−2 s−1 and ci of 255 μmol m−2 s−1 at a photon flux of 2000 μmol m−2 s−1 (Fig. 1), the photorespiratory rate of CO2 release (Rp) would be 6.3 μmol m−2 s−1, following the equations of Farquhar et al.20. This calculated rate, based on properties of spinach, is very close to the rate derived here for A. donax by combining fluorescence and gas exchange measurements (Fig. 2) via the equations of Valentini et al.35. This suggests that as a proportion of net photosynthesis, photorespiratory loss of carbon is just as great in A. donax as in other C3 species.

Is the rate of CO2 assimilation in limiting light high in A. donax? Light limited photosynthesis is determined by the efficiency with which the leaf can absorb incident light (α) and the maximum absolute quantum yield of CO2 assimilation (ΦCO2,max), i.e. the initial slope of the response of A to I, corrected for absorptance (α). The value is therefore the maximum ratio of net absorbed CO2 molecules to absorbed photons. The ΦCO2,max determined for A. donax here in normal air at 25 °C was 0.056 mol mol−1. Osborne and Garrett49 similarly measured ΦCO2,max by combining gas exchange and integrating sphere measurements across a range of C3 herbage grasses and cereals, covering different ploidy levels and cultivars in normal air and at 25 °C. They reported an average ΦCO2,max of 0.051, with a range of 0.047 to 0.055 across these C3 grasses. So this does place the values here for A. donax at the upper end of this range and 8% higher than the average. The realized efficiency of light limited photosynthesis will be the product of ΦCO2,max and the absorptance of the leaf (α). In surveying a wide range of healthy leaves of C3 species from tropical to polar habitats, Long et al.50, found an average α of 0.80 and a range across species from 0.65 to 0.90, similarly measured in an integrating sphere. By comparison, the α for A. donax of 0.89 therefore appears at the upper end of this range and 14% higher above the average. The product of the indicated above average ΦCO2,max and α therefore represents a 24% increase in CO2 uptake per unit incident light, under light-limiting conditions.

Does A. donax achieve high photosynthetic rates by minimizing stomatal limitation? The stomatal limitation imposed on photosynthesis, l, for A. donax found in this study (0.25 or 25%) was higher than for other C3 plants, which varied from 0.137 to 0.21751,52,53,54. This indicates that A. donax does not achieve its high photosynthetic rates through a high stomatal conductance. Indeed ci/ca at full sunlight (2000 μmol m−2 s−1) as a measure of the balance between stomatal conductance and assimilation was 0.64. This is almost 11% less than the average ci/ca of 0.72 for a range of C3 species19. A lower ci/ca requires a lower stomatal conductance relative to the photosynthetic rate, indicating a higher leaf level water use efficiency for a given leaf-air water vapour pressure deficit than the average for C3 species. So, while stomatal conductance may appear high (Fig. 1b), the low values of l and ci/ca in fact show that conductance is low relative to the high rates of leaf CO2 uptakes for a C3 plant. Nevertheless its high light-saturated and light-limited photosynthetic rates can still only be achieved at the expense of considerable transpiration. The relatively high stomatal conductance maintained into the late afternoon (Table 3) suggests that the plant may be able to tap deep water resources even in its native Mediterranean in the late summer. The LWUE of A. donax in this study (62.9 to 66.0 μmol mol−1) was higher than generally found for herbaceous species (43 μmol mol−1) and more similar to LWUE found for evergreen shrubs and deciduous trees (64 and 66 μmol mol−1, respectively)55. However, the LWUE of A. donax was still much lower than for C4 species such as Miscanthus and switchgrass (115 and 107 μmol mol−1)16. The high productivity of A. donax does resemble and exceeds that of C4 plants, however its LWUE is much lower and clearly C3-like. This supports the notion that, as discussed above, A. donax is able to achieve its high photosynthetic rates with substantial transpiration, but is still more efficient than most C3 species. This is interesting when considering the diversity of habitat distribution that A. donax is found in, which ranges from very wet loam to relatively dry sandy soils.

Overall this study has found that the photosynthetic capacity of A. donax in full sunlight is high compared to other C3 species and comparable to C4 bioenergy grasses. This is not the result of lower photorespiratory rates, but rather a high capacity for both RuBP-limited and RuBP-saturated photosynthesis, as evidenced by values of both Vc,max and Jmax that are near double the average for C3 species. High photosynthetic rates were not achieved through a high stomatal conductance, in fact stomatal limitation was found to be greater not less than in other C3 species. Light-limited photosynthesis, which will determine carbon uptake during periods of low light flux, around dawn and dusk and during heavy cloud, as well as in the lower canopy may be aided by relatively high maximum quantum yields of CO2 assimilation and high leaf absorptances.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Webster, R. J. et al. High C3 photosynthetic capacity and high intrinsic water use efficiency underlies the high productivity of the bioenergy grass Arundo donax. Sci. Rep. 6, 20694; doi: 10.1038/srep20694 (2016).

References

  1. EPA. Supplemental Final Rule for New Qualifying Renewable Fuels under the RFS Program. Environ. Prot. Agency - Off. Transp. Air Qual. (2013).

  2. Lewandowski, I., Scurlock, J. M. O., Lindvall, E. & Christou, M. The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe. Biomass and Bioenergy 25, 335–361 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pilu, R. Giant reed (Arundo donax L.): A weed plant or a promising energy crop? African J. Biotechnol. 11, 9163–9174 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Di Nasso, N., Roncucci, N. & Bonari, E. Seasonal Dynamics of Aboveground and Belowground Biomass and Nutrient Accumulation and Remobilization in Giant Reed (Arundo donax L.): A Three-Year Study on Marginal Land. BioEnergy Res. 6, 725–736 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mariani, C. et al. Origin, diffusion and reproduction of the giant reed (Arundo donax L.): a promising weedy energy crop. Ann. Appl. Biol. 157, 191–202 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Angelini, L. G., Ceccarini, L., Nassi o Di Nasso, N. & Bonari, E. Comparison of Arundo donax L. and Miscanthus x giganteus in a long-term field experiment in Central Italy: Analysis of productive characteristics and energy balance. Biomass and Bioenergy 33, 635–643 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heaton, E. A quantitative review comparing the yields of two candidate C4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water. Biomass and Bioenergy 27, 21–30 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Borin, M. et al. Biomass production and N balance of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) under high water and N input in Mediterranean environments. Eur. J. Agron. 51, 117–119 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ping, H., Bransby, D. I. & van Santen, E. Long-term biomass yields of giant reed, mimosa and switchgrass in Alabama. Biofuels, Bioprod. Biorefining 8, 59–66 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ceotto, E. et al. Comparing solar radiation interception and use efficiency for the energy crops giant reed (Arundo donax L.) and sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). F. Crop. Res. 149, 159–166 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Drewry, D. T., Kumar, P. & Long, S. P. Simultaneous improvement in productivity, water use and albedo through crop structural modification. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20, 1955–67 (2014).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arundale, R. et al. Yields of Miscanthus × giganteus and Panicum virgatum decline with stand age in the Midwestern USA. Glob. Chang. Biol. - Bioenergy 6, 1–13 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mann, J. J., Kyser, G. B., Barney, J. N. & DiTomaso, J. M. Assessment of Aboveground and Belowground Vegetative Fragments as Propagules in the Bioenergy Crops Arundo donax and Miscanthus × giganteus. bioenerg 6, 688–698 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Papazoglou, E. G., Karantounias, G. A., Vemmos, S. N. & Bouranis, D. L. Photosynthesis and growth responses of giant reed (Arundo donax L.) to the heavy metals Cd and Ni. In Environ. Int. 31, 243–249 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rossa, B., Tuffers, A. V., Naidoo, G. & Willert, D. J. Von. Arundo donax L. (Poaceae) - a C3 Species with Unusually High Photosynthetic Capacity. Bot. Acta 111, 216–221 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dohleman, F. G., Heaton, E. A., Leakey, A. D. B. & Long, S. P. Does greater leaf-level photosynthesis explain the larger solar energy conversion efficiency of Miscanthus relative to switchgrass? Plant. Cell Environ. 32, 1525–37 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dohleman, F. G. & Long, S. P. More productive than maize in the Midwest. How does Miscanthus do it? Plant Physiol. Preview, 109.139162 (2009).

  18. Long, S. P. & Spence, A. K. Toward cool C4 crops. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 701–22 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Long, S. P., Ainsworth, E. A., Rogers, A. & Ort, D. R. Rising Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide: Plants FACE the Future. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 55, 591–628 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Farquhar, G. D., Caemmerer, S., Von & Berry, J. A. A Biochemical Model of Photosynthetic CO2 Assimilation in Leaves of C3 Species. Planta 149, 78–90 (1980).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, D. et al. A physiological and biophysical model of coppice willow (Salix spp.) production yields for the contiguous USA in current and future climate scenarios. Plant. Cell Environ. 38, 1850–1865 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. ISRIC. (2014). at<www.isric.org>.

  23. Monteith, J. L., Campbell, G. S. & Potter, E. A. Theory and performance of a dynamic diffusion porometer. Agric. For. Meteorol. 44, 27–38 (1988).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Potter, L., Bingham, M. G., Baker, M. G. & Long, S. P. The potential of two perennial C4 grasses and a perennial C4 sedge as ligno-cellulosic fuel crops in N. W. Europe crop establishment and yields in E. England. Ann. Bot. 76, 513–520 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Baker, N. R. Chlorophyll Fluorescence: A Probe of Photosynthesis In Vivo. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 89–113 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Murchie, E. H. & Lawson, T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 3983–98 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernacchi, C. J., Singsaas, E. L., Pimentel, C., Portis Jr., A. R. & Long, S. P. Improved temperature response functions for models of Rubisco-limited photosynthesis. Plant, Cell Environ. 24, 253–259 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bernacchi, C. J., Pimentel, C. & Long, S. P. In vivo temperature response functions of parameters required to model RuBP-limited photosynthesis. Plant. Cell Environ. 26, 1419–1430 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Long, S. P. & Bernacchi, C. J. Gas exchange measurements, what can they tell us about the underlying limitations to photosynthesis? Procedures and sources of error. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 2393–2401 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Genty, B., Briantais, J.-M. & Baker, N. R. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 990, 87–92 (1989).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Marshall, B. & Biscoe, P. V. A Model for C3 Leaves Describing the Dependence of Net Photosynthesis on Irradiance. J. Exp. Bot. 31, 29–39 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Genty, B., Harbinson, J. & Baker, N. Relative quantum efficiencies of the two photosystems of leaves in photorespiratory and non-respiratory conditions. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 28, 1–10 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Edwards, G. E. & Baker, N. R. Can CO2 assimilation in maize leaves be predicted accurately from chlorophyll fluorescence analysis? Photosynth. Res. 37, 89–102 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Lawson, T. et al. C3 photosynthesis in the desert plant Rhazya stricta is fully functional at high temperatures and light intensities. New Phytol. 201, 862–873 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Valentini, R., Epron, D., Angelis, P. D. E., Matteucci, G. & Dreyer, E. In situ estimation of net CO2 assimilation, photosynthetic electron flow and photorespiration in Turkey oak (Q. cerris L.) leaves: diurnal cycles under different levels of water supply. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 631–640 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Naidu, S. L. & Long, S. P. Potential mechanisms of low temperature tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthus x giganteus: an in vivo analysis. Planta 220, 145–155 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Penman, H. L. & Schofield, R. K. Some physical aspects of assimilation and transpiration. in Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol 5, 115–129 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Bacon, M. Water use efficiency in plant biology. (John Wiley & Sons, 2009).

  39. Wullschleger, S. D. Biochemical Limitations to Carbon Assimilation in C3 Plants—A Retrospective Analysis of the A/Ci Curves from 109 Species. J. Exp. Bot. 44, 907–920 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Evans, J. R. & Farquhar, G. D. InModel. Crop Photosynth. Biochem. to canopy ( Boote, K. & Loomis, R. ) 1–15 (American Society of Agronomy, Inc, 1991).

  41. He, Z., Bentley, L. P. & Holaday, A. S. Greater seasonal carbon gain across a broad temperature range contributes to the invasive potential of Phalaris arundinacea (Poaceae; reed canary grass) over the native sedge Carex stricta (Cyperaceae). Am. J. Bot. 98, 20–30 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ziska, L. H. & Teramura, A. H. CO2 Enhancement of Growth and Photosynthesis in Rice (Oryza sativa): Modification by Increased Ultraviolet-B Radiation. Plant Physiol. 99, 473–481 (1992).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Siebke, K. et al. Control of photosynthesis in leaves as revealed by rapid gas exchange and measurements of the assimilatory force FA. Planta 182, 513–522 (1990).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Harley, P. C. & Sharkey, T. D. An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2: Reversed O2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate reentry into the chloroplast. Photosynth. Res. 27, 169–178 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Sage, R. F., Sharkey, T. D. & Seemann, J. R. Acclimation of Photosynthesis to Elevated CO2 in Five C3 Species. Plant Physiol. 89, 590–596 (1989).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Naidu, S. L., Moose, S. P., Al-Shoaibi, A. K., Raines, C. A. & Long, S. P. Cold Tolerance of C4 photosynthesis in Miscanthus x giganteus: Adaptation in Amounts and Sequence of C4 Photosynthetic Enzymes. 132, 1688–1697 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Ge, Z. M. et al. Acclimation of photosynthesis in a boreal grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) under different temperature, CO2 and soil water regimes. Photosynthetica 50, 141–151 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Brooks, A. & Farquhar, G. D. Effect of temperature on the CO2/O2 specificity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase and the rate of respiration in the light. Planta 165, 397–406 (1985).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Osborne, B. A. & Garrett, M. K. Quantum yields for CO2 uptake in some diploid and tetraploid plant species. Plant. Cell Environ. 6, 135–144 (1983).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Long, S. P., Postl, W. F. & Bolhàr-Nordenkampf, H. R. Quantum yields for uptake of carbon-dioxide in C-3 vascular plants of contrasting habitats and taxonomic groupings. Planta 189, 226–234 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Maroco, J. P., Rodrigues, M. L., Lopes, C. & Chaves, M. M. Limitations to leaf photosynthesis in field-grown grapevine under drought - metabolic and modelling approaches. Funct. Plant Biol. 29, 451 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bernacchi, C. J., Morgan, P. B., Ort, D. R. & Long, S. P. The growth of soybean under free air [CO2] enrichment (FACE) stimulates photosynthesis while decreasing in vivo Rubisco capacity. Planta 220, 434–446 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Ripley, B. S., Gilbert, M. E., Ibrahim, D. G. & Osborne, C. P. Drought constraints on C4 photosynthesis: Stomatal and metabolic limitations in C3 and C4 subspecies of Alloteropsis semialata. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 1351–1363 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hu, L., Wang, Z. & Huang, B. Diffusion limitations and metabolic factors associated with inhibition and recovery of photosynthesis from drought stress in a C3 perennial grass species. Physiol. Plant. 139, 93–106 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Medrano, H., Flexas, J. & Galmés, J. Variability in water use efficiency at the leaf level among Mediterranean plants with different growth forms. Plant Soil 317, 17–29 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Society of Experimental Biology Plant Environmental Physiology Group (PEPg) Techniques Workshop, Lisbon 2014 for bringing the authors together. This was also made possibly by financial support from NERC Advanced training award; NE/M006395/1, the British Ecology Society and the Journal of Experimental Botany. We also thank ADC BioScientific Ltd, Decagon Devices, Delta-T Devices Ltd, Dynamax Inc., LI-COR Biosciences UK Ltd, Ocean Optics and Heinz Walz GmbH for providing equipment and site manager, Benjamin Richter, of Quinta de São Pedro Study Centre, Lisbon, Portugal, for logistical support.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

R.W. and S.D. conceived and designed the study. R.W., S.D., S.L., J.K., J.M., A.L., K.S., T.D., T.L., T.P. and S.B. all contributed to data collection and analysis. R.W. and S.D. produced the final analysis. R.W., S.D. and S.L. primarily led manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed the final manuscript.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Webster, R., Driever, S., Kromdijk, J. et al. High C3 photosynthetic capacity and high intrinsic water use efficiency underlies the high productivity of the bioenergy grass Arundo donax. Sci Rep 6, 20694 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20694

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing