Under high pressure, krypton, one of the most inert elements is predicted to become sufficiently reactive to form a new class of krypton compounds; krypton oxides. Using modern ab-initio evolutionary algorithms in combination with Density Functional Theory, we predict the existence of several thermodynamically stable Kr/O species at elevated pressures. In particular, our calculations indicate that at approx. 300 GPa the monoxide, KrO, should form spontaneously and remain thermo- and dynamically stable with respect to constituent elements and higher oxides. The monoxide is predicted to form non-molecular crystals with short Kr-O contacts, typical for genuine chemical bonds.
Ever since the successful isolation of argon1, followed by five other noble-gases, the six members of Group-18 were long considered very much unreactive, if not completely inert. Nonetheless, during the advent of quantum chemistry and the resulting rapid development of theoretical apparatus Pauling did predict possible formation of stable noble-gas compounds, in particular XeF6 and KrF62. It took another 30 years before Bartlett synthesized the first noble-gas compound, XePtF63. The very first synthesis of neutral krypton compound, the difluoride (KrF2), was reported soon-after, in 19634.
In 1992 Lundell and Kanttu studied simple molecular Kr2H+ using modern ab-initio methods, including effective core potential approach and all-electron methods5. In 2000, Lundell et al. investigated experimental formation of more complex, neutral krypton hydrides of the H-Kr-Y type (here Y is an electronegative fragment) in low-temperature matrices6. In 2002 Pettersson et al. reported formation of H-Kr-F in low-temperature Kr matrix via VUV photolysis of the HF precursor7. Later on, in 2003 Räsänen group reported first synthesis of neutral Kr-containing organic compounds, in the form of H-Kr-C=C-H, followed by an extensive ab-initio calculations8. Most recently Kameneva et al. studied in details the mechanism and kinetics of the processes leading to the formation of H-Kr-C=C-H in solid krypton matrices9. To date, a number of other krypton species have been identified, including van der Waals complexes10, numerous salts containing in particular KrF+ and Kr2F3+ cations11,12 and several complexes containing coordinated neutral F-Kr-F units13,14. For more information of krypton chemistry see Nabiev et al.15 and Grochala16.
Recent developments in the field of ultra-high pressures, in particular development of the diamond-anvil cell (DAC) techniques, allow for synthesis and detailed characterization of new species at unprecedentedly high pressures17. Nevertheless, while the DAC techniques are becoming increasingly available they are still far from routine and require a significant amount of expertise and experimental effort.
To date, very few krypton compound have been studied at high-pressure10. To the best of our knowledge no binary compound of krypton and oxygen have been previously investigated. In the absence of experimental data we applied modern computational techniques to explore the static phase diagram of the Kr–O2 system in a wide pressure range, from 10 to 500 GPa, searching for hitherto unknown krypton oxides. We analyzed the possibility of high-pressure formation and stabilization of four binary systems with variable oxygen content, including KrO, KrO2, KrO3 and KrO4. For each stoichiometry we performed an extensive search for the most stable structures combining several complementary approaches, including prototypical structures and the application of modern evolutionary algorithms based on purely chemical composition - with no experimental input required (for details see the SM)18,19.
Results and Discusion
At ambient pressure krypton freezes at 115.77 K to form a while crystalline solid with face-centered cubic (fcc) crystal structure. In our calculations already at slightly elevated pressure (P > 10 GPa) krypton adopts a hexagonal close-packed (hcp) structure and maintains it in the whole considered pressure range (10-500 GPa). In the case of oxygen, depending on the pressure applied, we used ε and ζ structures for reference20. Concerning the Kr-O2 mixture there are certain trends one might expect. While krypton remains unreactive at ambient conditions a substantial increase of pressure should bring all atoms, both Kr and O closer together, at least on average. Some Kr-O contacts should be more susceptible to compression thus inducing krypton-oxygen reactivity.
To identify thermodynamically stable binary compounds of krypton and oxygen we analyze a number of predefined Kr:O ratios (1:1, 1:2, 1:3 and 1:4) in a wide pressure range (P = 10-500 GPa). We analyze the relative stability of each of the considered stoichiometries by plotting the relative enthalpies of formation, calculated per atom, as function of oxygen content. The resulting tie-line plot is given in Fig. 1. Oxides which are stable with respect to disproportionation into other oxides and/or pure elements form a convex hull of energy with respect to relevant substrates. Note that even at 400 > P ≫ 200 GPa all of the studied oxides remain unstable with respect to disproportionation into pure elements.
The monoxide is the first to stabilize, at P ≃ 285 GPa and it remains the primary candidate for synthesis as it is the only stoichiometry thermodynamically stable not only with respect to pure elements but also with respect to disproportionation into other oxides. As the pressure increases, the relative enthalpy of formation of higher oxides, with the notable exception of KrO4, become less and less positive and eventually negative but it still remains substantially negative only for KrO. At the level of theory applied our calculations clearly indicate that at a sufficiently high pressure krypton oxide formation should be thermodynamically viable with the 1:1 stoichiometry clearly favored. With this in mind we now proceed with the detailed characterization of the predicted, most stable phases of KrO. In Fig. 2 we present the relative enthalpy of formation calculated for the four most competitive phases of KrO.
As the pressure increases, the relative enthalpies of formation of all the phases become negative. Phase A and D exhibit non-molecular character, Phase B is a mixture of atomic krypton and molecular oxygen and Phase C is a host-guest structure (see Fig. 3 for schematic illustration). The non-molecular Phase D stabilizes first, at approximately 285 GPa and remains the most stable KrO phase up to 500 GPa.
At low pressures Phase B is thermodynamically most stable although its relative enthalpy of formation with respect to bulk krypton and oxygen remains positive up to 340 GPa. This metastable, molecular phase consists of atomic krypton mixed with diatomic oxygen. Even at 300 GPa the oxygen molecule is clearly present with the O-O bond length equal to 1.235 Å (compare to 1.210 Å at ambient pressure). At the same time the shortest Kr-O contact distance is equal to 2.119 Å, indicating lack of significant chemical interaction.
At 285 GPa Phase D stabilizes. While it remains highly unstable at low pressure, upon stabilization it remains the most stable even at 500 GPa. Phase D lacks the molecular character. At 300 GPa the shortest O-O distance is 2.244 Å while the shortest Kr-O contact is only 1.807 Å indicating significant interaction between oxygen and the noble gas atoms. Structurally, Phase D consists of infinite \Kr ∕ O\Kr ∕ O\ zigzag chains with the ∠(Kr-O-Kr) = 84.35° (see Fig. 3 for illustration).
Phase A shares several similarities with phase D; it also lacks any molecular character and it is also constructed from infinite, albeit linear, -Kr-O-Kr-O- chains; within each such chain all Kr-O distances are equal. At 300 GPa the shortest O-O distance is now 2.455 Å while the shortest, intrachain Kr-O contacts are 1.863 Å.
Phase C is given for completeness. In contrast to the other phases it is as a host-guest-type structure in which each krypton atom is coordinated by eight oxygen atoms. At 300 GPa the eight Kr-O distances are 2.126 Å long and are comparable to Kr-O2 distance (2.119 Å) in the molecular Phase B – once again indicating lack of substantial Kr-O interactions.
Among the four discussed phases the shortest observed Kr-O distance (1.807 Å) is present in Phase D. Only a slightly longer distance is also present in Phase A (1.863 A). In both the phases the second shortest Kr-O contact is 2.185 and 2.126 Å respectively and it is nearly identical with the shortest Kr-O contact in Phase B and C (2.119 and 2.126 Å respectively) in which oxygen, either molecular or atomic, is expected to be chemically unbound.
Here we note that the shortest Kr-O contact in Phase D (1.807 Å) is only 13.6% longer than a single covalent bond estimated by Pyykkö and Atsumi (1.590 Å)21. The presence of such short directional contacts indicates genuine chemical bonding between krypton and oxygen and explains increased theromodynamical stability of Phase A and D.
Indeed, among the best structures for higher krypton oxides (KrOx, x = 2, 3, 4) we observed exclusively molecular crystals in which monoatomic krypton is mixed with molecular oxygen (see Fig. S1 for detail). For those oxygen-rich stoichiometries we find no evidence of short Kr-O bonding, even at 500 GPa.
Phonon calculations are of interest both as guarantors of dynamical stability and with respect to the information such calculations may yield on the ease, or difficulty, of motions in the structures considered. Our analysis reveals that all of the reported KrO phases are dynamically stable within the pressure range corresponding to their theromodynamical stability. For all the considered phases, except Phase C, we observed negative frequencies only at P ≪ 250 GPa. Phase C does stabilize dynamically but only at P ≫ 400 GPa; we thus neglect it in the further considerations. In Fig. 4 we present phonon analysis for Phases A, B and D performed consistently at P = 400 GPa (sufficiently high for all the phases to become thermodynamically stable).
For Phase A we observe no separate phonon branches. Visualization reveals numerous modes in which oxygen and krypton atom motion is always conjugated. Interestingly, we observe one particularly flat phonon band giving rise to sharp increase in the phonon density of states (PhDOS) at 600 cm−1. We identify this contribution as a mixture of stretching and bending modes of -O-Kr–O-. In case of Phase B a clearly separated phonon branch is located at ca. 1550 cm−1 corresponding to the stretching mode of the O2 molecules. For Phase D we observe two separate branches; the high energy branch (700–1000 cm−1) arises primarily due to oxygen contributions while the low energy branch (0–600 cm−1) arises due to krypton displacements.
We note that the higher oxides, in particular KrO2, are also dynamically stable upon theromodynamical stabilization. In case of the enthalpically best structures (see SM, Fig. S1) our vibrational analysis reveals presence of the stretching modes located at approx. 1550 cm−1 clearly indicating presence of the undissociated O2 molecules.
We analyze the conductive properties of the identified phases of KrO by calculating band structures and the corresponding electronic densities of states (DOS) for the ground state structures optimized at 300 GPa. Here, we note, that the Kohn–Sham formulation of DFT is well known to underestimate the width of electronic band gaps. While we did not try to correct for this, the study of the electronic structures is still likely to give us reliable, qualitative information about the insulating/semiconducting/metallic character of the considered krypton oxide phases. We here focus on the characterization of the three viable structures for 1:1 stoichiometry: Phase A, B and D.
The results are shown in Fig. 5. In all three cases analysis of the total DOS indicates significant accumulation of the occupied states below the Fermi level (Ef); only for Phase A the DOS remains non-zero at Fermi level and is indicative of metallic character. This metallic character is likely a derivative of the polymeric structure of Phase A composed of infinite linear -(Kr-O)n- chains. For the two other Phases, B and D, electronic gaps are observed, indicating that the two phases are most likely either insulating or, particularly in the case of Phase B, semi-conductive. In all three cases the valence band levels compose primarily from the p-orbitals of krypton and oxygen. The partitioning of the total densities of states along with the Mulliken and Hirshfeld analysis suggest significant charge transfer from krypton to oxygen atoms.
Altogether the results indicate that under pressure krypton loses its chemical inertness. In both the non-molecular phases (Phase A and D) krypton is expected to form genuine bonds with oxygen. To complete the description of the predicted oxides and to illustrate bonding in Kr-O we plot the electron density distribution function. For consistency we chose the same pressure and the same cut-off values for all three cases (300 GPa and 0.15 a0−3, respectively). The results are shown in Fig. 6.
Note the presence of significantly increased electron density between krypton and oxygen atoms. Similarly, in case of Phase B (the molecular one) electron density distribution provides clear evidence on the interstitial character of the guest oxygen molecules.
In summary, we predict that at high compression (P = 285 GPa) krypton monoxide stabilizes thermodynamically and forms spontaneously. At even higher pressures (P approx. 400 GPa) a di- and trioxide also stabilize. The monoxide is expected to remain the preferred stoichiometry both with respect to decomposition into pure elements and with respect to disproportionation into the higher oxides even at the highest of the considered pressures (up to 500 GPa). The most stable phase predicted for krypton monoxide is a non-molecular Phase D (Imma, Z = 2); in it krypton forms genuine chemical bonds with oxygen. At 300 GPa our calculations identify short Kr-O contacts in the order of 1.80 Å; within the range expected for covalent bonds.
We note that this prediction can be tested experimentally; in particular, within all the predicted stoichiometries and the corresponding phases, structure of the krypton framework is a clear departure from the high-pressure hcp structure of bulk krypton; should one try to synthesize the oxides, such dramatic symmetry change should help identify the resulting species.
All of the reported calculations were performed using spin non-polarized functional theory (DFT) with the Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof (PBE) parameterizations of the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) as implemented in the VASP code (ver. 4.6)22,23. The projector augmented wave (PAW)24,25 method was applied with PAW pseudo-potentials taken from the VASP archive. For the plane-wave basis-set expansion, an energy cut-off of 1000 eV was used. Valence electrons (Kr: 4s24p6; O: 2s22p4) have been treated explicitly, while standard VASP pseudopotentials were used for the description of core electrons.
The Γ-centered k-point mesh was generated for every structure in such a way that the spacing between the k-points was approximately 0.10 Å. Structures have been optimized using a conjugate-gradient algorithm with a convergence criterion of 10−7 eV. This ensured that in the optimized structures forces acting on the ions were in the order of 1 meV∙Å−1. The enthalpies derived from our calculations do not contain the zero-point-energy (ZPE) corrections. Contrary to the hydrogen-rich species, we expect those to be of little importance. For each stoichiometry we performed an extensive computational search for the most stable structures combining several complementary approaches: prototypical structures, purely random structure generation and evolutionary algorithms18,19. In our calculations we used up to Z = 4 formula units per unit cell.
Dynamical stability of the identified, enthalpically preferred structures has been assessed through phonon analysis within the harmonic approximation. Phonon dispersion curves were calculated using the finite-displacement method as implemented in the CASTEP code . We used sufficiently large super-cells, typically in the order of 3 × 3 × 3, or larger, in the interpolation of the force constants required for the accurate phonon calculations. Finally, we stress that the structures we consider are all ground state arrangements whereas the measurements are carried out at finite, typically close to room, temperatures.
How to cite this article: Zaleski-Ejgierd, P. and Lata, P. M. Krypton oxides under pressure. Sci. Rep. 6, 18938; doi: 10.1038/srep18938 (2016).
Rayleigh, L. & Ramsay, W. Argon, a New Constituent of the Atmosphere. Proc. R. Soc. 57, 265–287 (1894).
Pauling, L. The Formulas of Antimonic Acid and the Antimonates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 55, 1895–1900 (1933).
Bartlett, N. Xenon hexafluoroplatinate (V) Xe+[PtF6]−. Proc. Chem. Soc. 218, 197–236 (1962).
MacKenzie, D. R. Krypton Difluoride: Preparation and Handling. Science 141, 1171–1172 (1963).
Lundell, J. & Kunttu, H. Structure, spectra and stability of argon hydride ion (Ar2H+), krypton hydride ion (Kr2H+), xenon hydride ion (Xe2H+): an effective core potential approach. J. Phys. Chem. 96, 9774–9781 (1992).
Lundell, J., Khriachtchev, L., Pettersson, M. & Rasanen, M. Formation and characterization of neutral krypton and xenon hydrides in low-temperature matrices. Low Temp. Phys. 26, 680–690 (2000).
Pettersson, M., Khriachtchev, L., Lignel, A. & Gerber, R. B. HKrF in solid krypton. J. Chem. Phys. 116, 2508–2515 (2002).
Khriachtchev, L. et al. A Gate to Organokrypton Chemistry: HKrCCH. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 23, 6876–6877 (2003).
Kameneva, S. V., Kobzarenko, A. V. & Feldman, V. I. Kinetics and mechanism of the radiation-chemical synthesis of krypton hydrides in solid krypton matrices. Rad. Phys. Chem. 110, 17–23 (2015).
Kleppe, A. K., Amboage, M. & Jephcoat, A. P. New high-pressure van der Waals compound Kr(H2)4 discovered in the krypton-hydrogen binary system. Sci. Rep. 4, 4989 (2014).
Lehmann, J. F., Dixon, D. A. & Schrobilgen, G. J. X-ray Crystal Structures of α-KrF2, [KrF][MF6] (M = As, Sb, Bi), [Kr2F3][SbF6]·KrF2, [Kr2F3]2[SbF6]2·KrF2 and [Kr2F3][AsF6]·[KrF][AsF6]; Synthesis and Characterization of [Kr2F3][PF6]·nKrF2; and Theoretical Studies of KrF2, KrF+, Kr2F3+ and the [KrF][MF6] (M = P, As, Sb, Bi) Ion Pairs. Inorg. Chem. 40, 3002–3017 (2001).
Holloway, J. H. & Hope, E. G. Advances in Inorganic Chemistry. s.l. Academic Press., p. 57 (1998).
DeBackere, J. R., Mercier, H. P. A. & Schrobilgen, G. J. Noble-Gas Difluoride Complexes of Mercury(II): The Syntheses and Structures of Hg(OTeF5)2·1.5NgF2 (Ng = Xe, Kr) and Hg(OTeF5)2 . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136, 3888–3903 (2014).
Brock, D. S. et al. A Rare Example of a Krypton Difluoride Coordination Compound: [BrOF2][AsF6]·2KrF2 . J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 3533–3542 (2010).
Nabiev, S. S., Sokolov, V. B. & Chaivanov, B. B. Molecular and crystal structures of noble gas compounds. Rus. Chem. Rev. 83, 1135–1180 (2014).
Grochala, W. Atypical compounds of gases, which have been called ‘noble’. Chem. Soc. Rev. 36, 1632–1655 (2007).
Dubrovinsky, L. et al. Implementation of micro-ball nanodiamond anvils for high-pressure studies above 6 Mbar. Nat. Commun. 3, 1163 (2012).
Oganov, A. R. & Glass, C. W. Crystal structure prediction using ab initio evolutionary techniques: Principles and applications. J. Chem. Phys. 124, 244704 (2006).
Lyakhov, A. O. et al. New developments in evolutionary structure prediction algorithm USPEX. Comput. Phys. Commun. 184, 1172–1182 (2013).
Yanming, M., Oganov, A. R. & Glass, C. W. Structure of the metallic ζ-phase of oxygen and isosymmetric nature of the ε−ζ phase transition: Ab initio simulations. Phys. Rev. B. 76, 064101 (2007).
Pyykkö, P. & Atsumi, M. Molecular single-bond covalent radii for elements 1-118. Chem.–Eur. J. 15, 186–197 (2008).
Kresse, G. & Furthmuller, J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B. 54, 11169 (1996).
Blochl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 50, 17953 (1994).
Kresse, G. & Joubert, D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B. 59, 1758 (1999).
The grant UMO-2012/05/B/ST3/02467 of the Polish National Science Centre (NCN) is acknowledged.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Zaleski-Ejgierd, P., Lata, P. Krypton oxides under pressure. Sci Rep 6, 18938 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18938
Frontiers in Physics (2020)
Journal of the American Chemical Society (2019)
Squeezing All Elements in the Periodic Table: Electron Configuration and Electronegativity of the Atoms under Compression
Journal of the American Chemical Society (2019)
Communications Chemistry (2019)
Nature Communications (2018)