Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

π Berry phase and Zeeman splitting of Weyl semimetal TaP


The recent breakthrough in the discovery of Weyl fermions in monopnictide semimetals provides opportunities to explore the exotic properties of relativistic fermions in condensed matter. The chiral anomaly-induced negative magnetoresistance and π Berry phase are two fundamental transport properties associated with the topological characteristics of Weyl semimetals. Since monopnictide semimetals are multiple-band systems, resolving clear Berry phase for each Fermi pocket remains a challenge. Here we report the determination of Berry phases of multiple Fermi pockets of Weyl semimetal TaP through high field quantum transport measurements. We show our TaP single crystal has the signatures of a Weyl state, including light effective quasiparticle masses, ultrahigh carrier mobility, as well as negative longitudinal magnetoresistance. Furthermore, we have generalized the Lifshitz-Kosevich formula for multiple-band Shubnikov-de Haas (SdH) oscillations and extracted the Berry phases of π for multiple Fermi pockets in TaP through the direct fits of the modified LK formula to the SdH oscillations. In high fields, we also probed signatures of Zeeman splitting, from which the Landé g-factor is extracted.


In Dirac semimetals, the discrete band touching points near the Fermi level - the Dirac nodes - are protected from gap opening by crystalline symmetry. The linear energy band dispersion near Dirac nodes hosts Dirac fermions whose low energy physics can be described by Dirac equation. With lifting spin degeneracy by breaking either time-reversal or inversion symmetry, a Dirac node is expected to split to a pair of Weyl nodes with opposite chirality1,2. The conservation of chirality of such pairs of separated Weyl nodes in momentum space leads to their topological robustness against translational symmetry invariant perturbations1,2. Near Weyl nodes, electrons behave as Weyl fermions and result in exotic signatures in Weyl semimetal, such as surface Fermi arcs that connect Weyl nodes of opposite chirality3. Moreover, Weyl fermions in Weyl semimetals also manifest themselves with exotic signatures in electron transport, such as chiral anomaly-induced negative longitudinal magnetoresistance (Adler-Bell-Jackiw chiral anomaly) and Berry phase of π.

The recently proposed Weyl semimetal phase in transition metal monopnictides TX (T = Ta/Nb, X = As, P)1,2 has stimulated intensive interests. Unlike the proposed magnetic Weyl semimetals3,4,5, Weyl nodes appearing in TX is due to broken inversion symmetry1,2. Discontinuous surface Fermi arcs has been observed in photoemission spectroscopy studies on these materials6,7,8,9,10, confirming the existence of Weyl nodes. In addition, the Adler-Bell-Jackiw chiral anomaly, which is reflected as negative longitudinal magnetoresistance (MR)11,12,13, has also been observed in TaAs14,15,16, TaP17,18, NbAs19 and NbP20.

In additional to the chiral anomaly-induced negative MR, non-trivial Berry phase of π is another important characteristic which can be revealed in the transport measurements. Berry phase describes the additional geometrical phase factor acquired in the adiabatic evolution along a closed trajectory in the parameter space21. Such additional phase does not depend on the details of the temporal evolution and thus differs from the dynamical phase21,22. In condensed matter, the Berry phase is determined by the topological characteristics of the electron bands in the Brillouin zone22,23,24. A non-zero Berry phase reflects the existence of band touching point such as Dirac nodes and manifest itself in observable effects in quantum oscillations. The cyclotron motion (that is, closed trajectory in momentum space) of Dirac fermions under magnetic field B induces Berry phase that changes the phase of quantum oscillations. Generally, through mapping the Landau level (LL) fan diagram (nth LL index vs. 1/Bn, the inverse of the applied magnetic field), the Berry phase can be conveniently extracted from the intercept of the linear extrapolation of LL index to the zero of inverse field 1/B. Experimentally, a Berry phase of π arising from the linear band dispersion of a Dirac cone22,24 has been probed from the Shubnikov–de Haas (SdH) oscillations in both two dimensional (e.g. graphene25,26, topological insulators27,28 and SrMnBi229) and three dimensional (e.g. Cd3As230,31) Dirac fermion systems.

In Weyl semimetals, a similar linear band dispersion1,2,6,7,8,9,10 also generates a non-trivial Berry phase of π. However, unlike the well-established π Berry phase in Dirac systems as mentioned above25,26,27,28,29,30,31, the experimental determination of Berry phase using the LL fan diagram remains elusive for monopnictide Weyl semimetals. First, the identification of the integer LL indices is inconsistent among published works; both the resistivity minima19 and maxima14,15,16,20 have been used to assign the integer LL indices. Secondly, while all of these reports claim a non-trivial or π Berry phase, the intercept values obtained from the LL index plot, which are used to derive Berry phase, are diverse: 014,15 and −0.0816 for TaAs, 0.1219,32 for NbAs and 0.3220 for NbP. As for TaP, however, Berry phase remains unexplored in the earlier studies17,18. Indeed, the LL fan diagram technique may not be an efficient method to extract the precise value of Berry phase in these monopnictide Weyl semimetals. Unlike previously studied Dirac systems which display only single frequency in SdH oscillations25,26,27,28,29,30,31, monopnictide Weyl semimetals exhibit quantum oscillations with multiple frequencies due to the existence of multiple Fermi pockets1,2,6,7,8,9,10. Therefore the oscillation peaks may not accurately correspond to the LL indices due to wave superposition. In addition, if one oscillation frequency is close to another (which is commonly seen in these systems for some certain field orientations17,20,32), separating the individual peak requires high magnetic field which was not achieved in previous low field studies14,15,16,19,20.

In order to address these issues, we conducted systematic high field magnetotransport measurements on TaP single crystals up to 31 T. Our TaP crystal used in this study has superior quality, as demonstrated in the extremely large MR (1 × 106% at 1.6 K and 31 T, 300% at 300 K and 9 T) and ultra-high mobility (2.5 × 106 cm2/V s for hole-type carriers at 1.6 K). The availability of such high quality crystals allows us to probe intrinsic quantum transport properties of TaP. Instead of using the LL fan diagram technique to extract the Berry phase, we have generalized the Lifshitz-Kosevich (LK) formula33,34,35 and fitted the multi-frequency SdH oscillations in TaP. This approach is capable of revealing Berry phases for multiple Fermi pockets. Through this approach, we find that electrons from multiple Fermi pockets have π Berry phases accumulated along their cyclotron orbits, which agrees well with the nature of Weyl fermions. In high fields, we also observed Zeeman spin splitting, which enables us to extract the Landé g-factor for TaP for the first time.

Results and Discussions

Figure 1 shows the magnetotransport properties of TaP with magnetic field along the crystallographic [100] axis and perpendicular to the current direction. The zero-field resistivity of TaP displays metallic behavior, with residual resistivity ~1.2 μΩ cm at 2 K and the residual resistivity ratio (RRR) ρ(300 K)/ρ(2 K) ~65, implying high quality of our single crystals. Applying magnetic field perpendicular to the current direction (BI) induces extremely large MR and changes the temperature dependence of resistivity dramatically. A resistivity upturn appears when field B > 0.1 T, which becomes more significant with increasing magnetic field and develops to an insulting-like behavior in full temperature range when B > 3 T (Fig. 1a). Such “metal - to - insulator-like” evolution driven by magnetic field is also observed in WTe236 and consistent with pervious observations in TaP18 and other Weyl semimetals14,15,16,19,37,38.

Figure 1

Transport properties of TaP.

(a) Temperature dependence of resistivity under various magnetic field B from 0 to 14 T. The magnetic field is applied perpendicual to the current direction. Inset: image of a large TaP crystal. (b) Magnetoresistance Δρ /ρ0 = [ρ(B)–ρ(B = 0)]/ρ(B = 0) of TaP at various temperatures T. From bottom to top: T = 50, 40, 30, 20, 15, 12, 10, 7, 5, 3 and 1.6 K. Inset: Magnetoresistance at high temperatures. (c) Hall resistivity ρxy at various temperatures. The inset shows the ρxy at higer temperature from 60 K to 300 K (d) Temperature dependence the Hall coefficient RH.The inset shows the mobility extracted from the two-band model fitting (see text).

The extremely large MR can be better visualized in the field dependence of resistivity presented in Fig. 1b. At T = 1.6 K, the normalized MR Δρxx0 ( = [ρxx(B) − ρxx(B = 0)]/ρxx(B = 0)) reaches 3 × 105% at 9 T, larger than pervious observations in ref. 17. Further increasing field leads MR to reach 1 × 106% at 31 T without saturation and SdH oscillations become visible above 9 T. Even at room temperature, giant MR as large as 300% can be observed at B = 9 T (Fig. 1b, inset). It is surprising to observe such huge MR in a sample with RRR ~ 65, given that large MR is usually accompanied with RRR of a few hundreds or even thousands36,39,40. In fact, large MR with RRR less than 100 is commonly observed in monopnictide Weyl semimetals14,15,16,17,18,19,20,32,37,38, in contrast with Dirac semimetal Cd3As2 in which MR and RRR are more closely related41. In addition to the large magnitude, a linear field dependence for MR (MRB) is also widely reported in monopnictide Weyl semimetals14,15,16,18,19,20,37. In our TaP single crystals, following a conventional quadratic dependence in low fields, a similar linear MR is also observed from B = 3 T up to 16 T. Nevertheless, in the high field region which was not well explored in the previous studies, a power law dependence ~B0.65 is found to better describe the MR data, suggesting that additional transport mechanisms may occur in high field.

To further characterize the electronic properties of TaP, we have measured the Hall resistivity ρxy up to high fields. As shown in Fig. 1c, at low temperatures, the negative slop of linear field dependence of ρxy(B) in high field range indicates that the transport is dominated by electrons; whereas the appearance of the nonlinear curvature in low field region implies the involvement of hole-type carriers. Indeed, both the theoretical calculations1,2 and photoemission studies6,7,8,9,10 reveal both electron- and hole- Fermi surfaces in monopnictide Weyl semimetals. With increasing temperature, the hole-type carriers gradually dominate the transport above 150 K, as indicated by the positive slop of ρxy(B) at high field (Fig. 1c, inset). Such evolution leads to the sign change of Hall coefficient RH that was derived from the linear dependence of ρxy(B) at high field (Fig. 1d), consistent with the previous reports on monopnictide Weyl semimetals14,15,16,17,18,19,20,37,38.

From two-band model fitting42, we have obtained ultra-high mobility μe ~ 1.8 × 105 cm2/V s and μh ~ 2.5 × 106 cm2/V s at 1.6 K for electrons and holes respectively, as well as a nearly ideal electron and hole compensation with ne ~ 11.53 × 1018 cm−3 and nh ~ 11.50 × 1018 cm−3. The observed high mobility is larger than that in previous observations in TaP (e.g., μh ~ 9 × 104 cm2/Vs17 and 2 × 105 cm2/Vs18) and comparable to that of NbP–the largest mobility seen in the monopnictide Weyl semimetal family (e.g., 5 × 106 38 and 1 × 107 cm2/V s20, estimated by single band model). Such high mobility may be responsible for the rapid increase of resistivity with magnetic field as described by ρ ~ (μB)2, while the nearly ideal electron-hole compensation prevents the saturation of MR in high fields36. However, this simple classical model fails to interpret the linear and ~B0.65 dependence of MR at high fields, suggesting the involvement of other mechanisms such as quantum linear MR43 or plausible broken topological protection under magnetic field41.

In Weyl semimetals, the pair of Weyl nodes acts as source and drain of Berry flux, leading to a non-zero Berry curvature Ωp and causing an additional topological contribution to the Weyl fermions dynamics, which is proportional to the product of electric and magnetic field, i.e., (E·Bp12,13. As a consequence, non-orthogonal electric and magnetic field (E·B ≠ 0) can lead to charge transfer between two Weyl nodes with opposite chirality. Such violation of the chiral charge conservation is known as the Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly or chiral anomaly11,12,13 and results in negative MR that can take place in semiclassical regime12,13. As shown in Fig. 2a,b, with magnetic field aligned parallel to the current direction (B//I), we observed negative longitudinal MR above B = 0.5 T at 1.6 K, which can be quickly suppressed when the field orientation is deviated from the current (Fig. 2b), in agreement with the pervious observations in Weyl semimetals14,15,16,17,18,19. The positive MR below 0.5 T may be ascribed to weak antilocalization due to strong spin-orbit coupling. With increasing field above 4 T, the negative MR turns to be positive, which roughly increases with B2 and is accompanied by strong SdH oscillations. This suggests a dominating classical orbital MR at high fields which is probably induced by non-ideal parallel alignment between B and I, or Fermi surface anisotropy44. With the suppression of the classic MR by rising temperature, negative MR becomes more prominent and extends to high field up to 31 T, without any signature of saturation (see the bottom panel in Fig. 2a). Such results are consistent with the earlier low field experiments for TaP17 and provide the first direct observation of significant chiral anomaly contribution to transport at high fields. The strong negative MR at high temperatures suggests that Weyl fermions make more significant contributions in TaP as compared to other monopnictide Weyl semimetals. This is consistent with the recent photoemission study which found that four pairs of Weyl points are located at the Fermi energy10.

Figure 2

Chiral anomaly-induced negative MR in TaP.

(a) the longitudinal MR at 1.6–30 K (top panel) and 50–150 K(bottom panel). (b) longitudinal MR at 1.6 K at different field orientation. The inset shows the experiment setup. (c) Fitting of the magnetoconductivity σ(B) at different temperatures using Eq. 1 (see text). Data for different temperatures has been shifted for charlity. The inset shows the temperature dependence of Cw extracted form fitting (see text).

Generally, in the quantum limit where all electrons are condensed to the lowest Landau level (LL), only the LL = 0 chiral branch is occupied and the intra-node scattering is prohibited. Therefore, the longitudinal current (E//B) can be relaxed only via inter-node scattering between a pair of Weyl nodes, causing the enhanced negative MR11,12. Indeed, a previous study has found that the negative MR in TaP is enhanced upon cooling and persists up to 14 T17, in sharp contrast with our observations of the high field (>4 T) positive MR at 1.6 K (Fig. 2a). This can be understood in terms of the ultra-high mobility of our TaP single crystals (an order of magnitude larger than that in ref. 17), which gives rise to much stronger classical MR since MRμ2B2.

More quantitative information of Weyl fermions transport in TaP can be extracted through their B2-dependence of magnetoconductivity (MC)12,13. The total conductivity can be written as in parallel field, in which σ0 is the normal conductivity and the chiral anomaly contribution is thus to be σ0CwB2 11. In our sample, the presence of weak antilocalization leads to correction to normal conductivity, i.e., 45. With the consideration of the additional classic positive MR B2 45, the MC of TaP can be written as:

Similar to the previous reports, two classic MR terms are necessary to obtain the satisfactory fit15,17. As shown in Fig. 2c, the above equation fits the chiral anomaly induced positive MC (negative MR) very well for all measured temperatures, as shown by the black solid fitting curves in Fig. 2c. However, the high field negative MC (positive MR) at low temperatures cannot be simultaneously described by Eq. 1. Similar observation has also been reported in ref. 17. This can be understood in terms of approaching quantum limit at low temperatures, where the contribution from chiral anomaly becomes linearly dependent on B11,12,13.

From the fitting we have extracted the chiral anomaly contribution σw = σ0CwB2 11 at various temperatures. In principle, Cw is T-independent and the temperature variation of σw results from σ0(T) (μ(T)). As expected, Cw displays very weak temperature dependence, as shown in the inset of Fig. 2c.

In addition to the chiral anomaly induced negative MR, the Berry phase of π accumulated in the cyclotron motion of Weyl fermions is another fundamental topological property of Weyl semimetals, since that the Berry phase takes the value of 0 and π for parabolic and linear band dispersions, respectively24. The effect of this additional phase factor in SdH oscillation can be described by the Lifshitz-Kosevich (LK) formula which is developed for 3D system with arbitrary band dispersions33,34,35:

In Eq. 2, the hyperbolic and exponential terms describe the temperature and field damping of oscillation amplitude, which are determined by effective mass m* and Dingle temperature TD respectively. The oscillation frequency is described by the cosine term that contains a phase factor , in which and ϕB is Berry phase. The phase shift δ is determined by the dimensionality of Fermi surface and takes values 0 for 2D and ±1/8 for 3D cases. The additional phase factor φ, which is missing in the original LK formula33,34,35, is due to the relative phase between conductivity and resistivity oscillations, i.e. Δσ and Δρ46. Given that , when the longitudinal resistivity ρxx transverse (Hall) resistivity ρxy, the oscillation component of σxx obtained by taking the derivative is , indicating completely out-of- phase for Δσ and Δρ. In contrary, when ρxx ρxy, Δσ and Δρ are in phase since . Therefore, when σxx is maximized with lifting LL to Fermi energy, ρxx can display either minimum (ρxx ρxy) or maximum (ρxx ρxy), leading to an additional phase factor φ = 1/2 or 0, respectively, in the LK formula.

Based on the above analysis, resistivity exhibits maximum (ρxx ρxy) or minimum (ρxx ρxy) with the Fermi level successively reaching the nth LL. Therefore from Eq. 2 we can obtain the Lifshitz-Onsager quantization rule: (when ρxx ρxy) or (when ρxx ρxy). Such linear relation between 1/Bn and n allows the extraction of and consequently the Berry phase through the intercept of the LL fan diagram (in fact, the intercept is the phase factor γ – δ + φ in the LK formula), as seen in a variety of Dirac systems25,26,27,28,29,30,31. However, the LL fan diagram approach is less efficient in monopnictide Weyl semimetals due to multiple frequencies involved in oscillations as discussed above. In Fig. 3a we show the oscillatory component of resistivity Δρ for BI at various temperatures obtained by subtracting the smooth MR background (Δρ = ρ − ρbr). A clear splitting can be observed around 0.04 T−1 (B = 25 T), which disappears above 10 K (Fig. 3a, inset) and can be ascribed to Zeeman splitting and will be discussed later. Except for this feature, Δρ is, however, still not exactly periodic in 1/B. In fact, the fast Fourier transfer (FFT) of Δρ (Fig. 3b, inset) yields two major frequencies at Fα = 110 T and Fβ = 150 T with comparable amplitude (the high field splitting data is not included for FFT). The superposition of two oscillation waves could cause broadening and even shift of the oscillation extrema, making it is difficult to assign LL index. Similar situation also occurs for the case of B//I (Fig. 4a,b), in which major frequencies of Fγ = 18 T and Fη = 44 T can be resolved via FFT.

Figure 3

SdH oscillations when BI.

(a) The oscillation component of resistivity at different temperatures, obtained by Δρ = ρ − ρbr. The inset shows the Zeeman splitting of an oscillation peak at high field, which gradually merges with raising temperature. Data at different temperatures has been shifted for clarity. (b) The temperature dependence of FFT amplitude for Δρ/ρ (B = 0). The solid lines show the effective mass fitting according to the temperature damping term of the Lifshitz-Kosevich formula. The inset shows the FFT for Δρ/ρ(B = 0) at various temperatures. (c) Fitting of SdH oscillation at 1.6 K and 10 K to the generalized LK model. The 10 K data has been shifted for clarity. (d) Zeeman splitting of longitudinal (Δρxx) and Hall resistivity (Δρxy). Δρxy at different temperatures has been shifted for clarity.

Figure 4

SdH oscillations when B//I.

(a) The oscillation component of resistivity Δρ = ρ–ρbr at different temperatures. The inset shows the Zeeman splitting of an oscillation peak at high field, which gradually merges with raising temperature. Data at different temperatures has been shifted for clarity. (b) The temperature dependence of FFT amplitude for Δρ/ρ (B = 0). The solid lines show the effective mass fitting according to the temperature damping term of the Lifshitz-Kosevich formula. The inset shows the FFT for Δρ/ρ (B = 0) at various temperatures (1.6–50 K). (c) Fitting of SdH oscillations at 1.6 K and 10 K to the generalized LK model. The 10 K data has been shifted for clarity.

Similar multi-frequency problem also occurs in other monopnictide Weyl semimetals due to their multiple Fermi pockets. Most of earlier works focused on the “major” oscillation extrema and found the corresponding Berry phase for one Fermi pocket14,16,19,20. Another approach is to use the 2nd derivative of Δρ to separate oscillation peaks for different frequencies32. In those works14,16,19,20,32, a variety of quite different intercepts in LL fan diagram has been obtained as mentioned above. Such inconsistence may be associated with sample variation or, more likely, the uncertainty in identifying 1/Bn due to the superposition of oscillation peaks.

In TaP, Berry phase has not been explored in previous magnetotransport studies17,18. In order to extract the accurate Berry phase in TaP, instead of the LL fan diagram, we attempted to use the LK formula (Eq. 2) to fit the multi-frequency SdH oscillations directly. Given that we have observed two major frequencies for both BI and B//I, we can reasonably assume that the total resistivity ρ due to two Fermi pockets follows 1/ρ = 1/ρ1 + 1/ρ2. Taking the differential we can obtain , indicating that the resistivity oscillations are additive and the LK formula (Eq. 2) can be easily generalized for multi-frequency oscillations by linear superposition. To reduce the fitting parameters, the effective mass m* can be first extracted through the fit of the temperature dependence of the amplitude of FFT for Δρ/ρ0 to the thermal damping term in the LK formula, i.e., with 1/ being the average inverse field. The values of m* are considerably smaller for γ and η Fermi pockets (mγ = 0.04 m0 and mη = 0.08 m0, m0 is the free electron mass, Fig. 4b) than those of α and β Fermi pockets (mα = 0.26 m0 and mβ = 0.24 m0, Fig. 3b), consistent with the previous results17.

To avoid the influence from Zeeman splitting, during the fitting using the LK formula, we have fitted the SdH oscillations at 10 K where the Zeeman effect is minimized by the thermal broadening of LL (see insets of Figs 3a and 4a), as well as the low temperature (T = 1.6 K) data with the high field splitting being excluded. As shown in Figs 3c and 4c, the two-band LK formula reproduces the resistivity oscillations well. The phase shift γ – δ + φ =  extracted from fitting are 0.42(3) and 0.41(2) for α and β Fermi pockets probed when BI and 0.12(3) and 0.67(6) for η and γ Fermi pockets probed when B//I. Given that ρxx ρxy for both BI and B//Ixy = 0 for B//I) in our experiments, we take φ = 1/2 as discussed above. With this condition, the phase shift obtained from our two-band LK fits yields a Berry phase ϕB close to π for α, β and γ Fermi pockets (in particular, 0.91(±0.06)π, 0.93(±0.04)π and 0.91(±0.12)π for α, β and γ Fermi pockets respectively), as well as a trivial Berry phase near zero for the η Fermi pocket (0.1π). Any other trails with the fixed zero Berry phase cannot yield a better fit, confirming the existence of the non-zero Berry phase. Such a result is consistent with the linear band dispersion of Weyl fermions in TaP and previous LL fan diagram analyses for other monopnictide Weyl semimetals14,15,16,19,20,32, which revealed a non-trivial Berry phase for single Fermi pocket. Given the effectiveness of our two-band LK fit, the generalization of our approach would allow determination of Berry phases of any multiple band systems with relativistic fermions for which the LL fan diagram approach is less efficient as discussed above.

In addition to the Berry phase, with high field measurements we determined the Landé g-factor through Zeeman splitting for the first time. As stated above, we have observed peak splitting in high field oscillations (around 0.04 T−1 for BI and 0.047 T−1 for B//I, see Figs 3a and 4a). With raising temperature above 10 K, the splitting gradually merges to single peak (insets of Figs 3a and 4a), implying an origin of the Zeeman effect. Such splitting becomes more significant in the oscillation of Hall resistivity Δρxy and also weakens with raising temperature, as shown in Fig. 3d. Unfortunately, we are unable to separate electrons from different Fermi surfaces in SdH oscillations, but an average g-factor of 2–2.9 can be obtained for α and/or β Fermi pockets and 5.5–6.7 for η and/or γ Fermi pockets, following the method used in ref. 31.


In summary, we have preformed systematic high field magnetotransport measurements on high quality TaP single crystals, which display extremely large magnetoresistance and ultra-high mobility. We have found the chiral anomaly-induced negative MR can extend up to 31T at high temperatures, implying significant involvement of Weyl fermions in transport. More importantly, using the generalized two band LK formula, we have successfully determined the non-trival Berry phase very close to π for multiple Fermi pockets in TaP. Such results not only reveal the unexplored fundamental topological properties of TaP, but also provide an effective approach that can be generalized to other Weyl semimetals.

Note: In the preparation of the manuscript, we were aware of a high field measurement which revealed quantum phase transition in TaP47 and a low field magnetotrasport work which revealed a non-trivial Berry phase for a single Fermi pocket in TaP using LL fan diagram48.


Single crystal growth and characterization

The high quality TaP single crystals were synthesized using a chemical vapor transport technique. The stoichiometric mixture of Ta and P powder was sealed in a quartz tube with iodine as transport agent (20 mg/cm3). Convex polytopes-like single crystals with metallic luster as large as 4 mm × 2.5 mm × 2 mm (Fig. 1a, inset) can be obtained via the vapor transport growth with a temperature gradient from 950 °C to 850 °C. The composition and structure of TaP single crystals were checked by X-ray diffraction and Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer.

Magnetotransport measurements

Samples for transport measurements were polished to be plate-like with [100] surface. The magnetotransport measurements are performed using a 14 T Physics Property Measurement System at AMRI, UNO and the 31 T resistive magnets at National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NHMFL) in Tallahassee.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Hu, J. et al. π Berry phase and Zeeman splitting of Weyl semimetal TaP. Sci. Rep. 6, 18674; doi: 10.1038/srep18674 (2016).


  1. Weng, H., Fang, C., Fang, Z., Bernevig, B. A. & Dai, X. Weyl Semimetal Phase in Noncentrosymmetric Transition-Metal Monophosphides. Phys. Rev. X 5, 011029 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Huang, S.-M. et al. A Weyl Fermion semimetal with surface Fermi arcs in the transition metal monopnictide TaAs class. Nature Commun. 6, 7373 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wan, X., Turner, A. M., Vishwanath, A. & Savrasov, S. Y. Topological semimetal and Fermi-arc surface states in the electronic structure of pyrochlore iridates. Phys. Rev. B 83, 205101 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Borisenko, S. et al. Time-reversal symmetry breaking Weyl state in YbMnBi2 . arXiv:1507.04847 (2015).

  5. Bulmash, D., Liu, C.-X. & Qi, X.-L. Prediction of a Weyl semimetal in Hg1-x-yCdxMnyTe. Phys. Rev. B 89, 081106 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu, S.-Y. et al. Discovery of a Weyl Fermion semimetal and topological Fermi arcs. Science 349, 613–617 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lv, B. Q. et al. Experimental Discovery of Weyl Semimetal TaAs. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031013 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lv, B. Q. et al. Observation of Weyl nodes in TaAs. Nature Phys. 11, 724–727 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, L. et al. Discovery of a Weyl Semimetal in non-Centrosymmetric Compound TaAs. arXiv:1507.00521 (2015).

  10. Xu, N. et al. Observation of Weyl nodes and Fermi arcs in TaP. arXiv:1507.03983 (2015).

  11. Nielsen, H. B. & Ninomiya, M. The Adler-Bell-Jackiw anomaly and Weyl fermions in a crystal. Phys. Lett. B 130, 389–396 (1983).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Son, D. T. & Spivak, B. Z. Chiral anomaly and classical negative magnetoresistance of Weyl metals. Phys. Rev. B 88, 104412 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jho, Y.-S. & Kim, K.-S. Interplay between interaction and chiral anomaly: Anisotropy in the electrical resistivity of interacting Weyl metals. Phys. Rev. B 87, 205133 (2013).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang, C. et al. Tantalum Monoarsenide: an Exotic Compensated Semimetal. arXiv:1502.00251 (2015).

  15. Zhang, C. et al. Observation of the Adler-Bell-Jackiw chiral anomaly in a Weyl semimetal. arXiv:1503.02630 (2015).

  16. Huang, X. et al. Observation of the chiral anomaly induced negative magneto-resistance in 3D Weyl semi-metal TaAs. Phys. Rev. X 5, 031023 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Shekhar, C. et al. Large and unsaturated negative magnetoresistance induced by the chiral anomaly in the Weyl semimetal TaP.arXiv:1506.06577 (2015).

  18. Zhang, C. et al. Large Magnetoresistance over an Extended Temperature Regime in Monophosphides of Tantalum and Niobium. Phys. Rev. B 92, 041203(R) (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang, X., Liu, Y., Wang, Z., Zheng, Y. & Xu, Z.-A. Chiral anomaly induced negative magnetoresistance in topological Weyl semimetal NbAs. arXiv:1506.03190 (2015).

  20. Wang, Z. et al. Helicity protected ultrahigh mobility Weyl fermions in NbP. arXiv:1506.00924 (2015).

  21. Berry, M. V. Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiabatic Changes. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45–57 (1984).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mikitik, G. P. & Sharlai, Y. V. Manifestation of Berry’s Phase in Metal Physics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2147–2150 (1999).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xiao, D., Chang, M.-C. & Niu, Q. Berry phase effects on electronic properties. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1959–2007 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taskin, A. A. & Ando, Y. Berry phase of nonideal Dirac fermions in topological insulators. Phys. Rev. B 84, 035301 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197–200 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, Y., Tan, Y.-W., Stormer, H. L. & Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature 438, 201–204 (2005).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Qu, D.-X., Hor, Y. S., Xiong, J., Cava, R. J. & Ong, N. P. Quantum Oscillations and Hall Anomaly of Surface States in the Topological Insulator Bi2Te3 . Science 329, 821–824 (2010).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sacépé, B. et al. Gate-tuned normal and superconducting transport at the surface of a topological insulator. Nature Commun. 2, 575 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Park, J. et al. Anisotropic Dirac Fermions in a Bi Square Net of SrMnBi2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 126402 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. He, L. P. et al. Quantum Transport Evidence for the Three-Dimensional Dirac Semimetal Phase in Cd3As2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 246402 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Narayanan, A. et al. Linear Magnetoresistance Caused by Mobility Fluctuations in n-Doped Cd3As2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 117201 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Luo, Y. et al. A novel electron-hole compensation effect in NbAs. arXiv:1506.01751 (2015).

  33. Landwehr, G. & Rashba, E. I. in Landau Level Spectroscopy: Modern Problems in Condensed Matter Sciences Vol. 27.2 (North-Holland, 1991).

  34. Shoenberg, D. Magnetic Oscillations in Metals. (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984).

  35. Murakawa, H. et al. Detection of Berry’s Phase in a Bulk Rashba Semiconductor. Science 342, 1490–1493 (2013).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ali, M. N. et al. Large, non-saturating magnetoresistance in WTe2 . Nature 514, 205–208 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ghimire, N. J. et al. Magnetotransport of single crystalline NbAs. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 27, 152201 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Shekhar, C. et al. Extremely large magnetoresistance and ultrahigh mobility in the topological Weyl semimetal candidate NbP. Nature Phys. 11, 645–649 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Mun, E. et al. Magnetic field effects on transport properties of PtSn4 . Phys. Rev. B 85, 035135 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang, K., Graf, D., Li, L., Wang, L. & Petrovic, C. Anisotropic giant magnetoresistance in NbSb2 . Sci. Rep. 4, 7328 (2014).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Liang, T. et al. Ultrahigh mobility and giant magnetoresistance in the Dirac semimetal Cd3As2 . Nature Mater. 14, 280–284 (2015).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Hurd, C. M. The Hall Effect in Metals and Alloys. (Springer, 1972).

  43. Abrikosov, A. A. Quantum magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. B 58, 2788–2794 (1998).

    CAS  ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pal, H. K. & Maslov, D. L. Necessary and sufficient condition for longitudinal magnetoresistance. Phys. Rev. B 81, 214438 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kim, H.-J. et al. Dirac versus Weyl Fermions in Topological Insulators: Adler-Bell-Jackiw Anomaly in Transport Phenomena. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 24660 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Xiang, F.-X., Wang, X.-L., Veldhorst, M., Dou, S.-X. & Fuhrer, M. S. Observation of topological transition of Fermi surface from a spindle torus to a torus in bulk Rashba spin-split BiTeCl. Phys. Rev. B 92, 035123 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Zhang, C. et al. Quantum Phase Transitions in Weyl Semimetal Tantalum Monophosphide. arXiv:1507.06301(2015).

  48. Du, J. et al. Unsaturated both large positive and negative magnetoresistance in Weyl Semimetal TaP. arXiv:1507.05246 (2015).

Download references


The authors thank Prof. Congjun Wu at UCSD for helpful discussions. The work at Tulane is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under EPSCoR Grant No. DE-SC0012432 with additional support from the Louisiana Board of Regents (support for materials, travel to NHMFL and personnel) and the National Science Foundation under the NSF EPSCoR Cooperative Agreement No. EPS-1003897 with additional support from the Louisiana Board of Regents (support for personnel). The work at UNO is supported by the NSF under the NSF EPSCoR Cooperative Agreement No. EPS-1003897 with additional support from the Louisiana Board of Regents. The work at FSU and at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, is supported by the NSF grant No. DMR-1206267, the NSF Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1157490 and the State of Florida. DG also acknowledges support from grant DOE DE-NA0001979.

Author information




The single crystals used in this study was synthesized by J.H. and J.Y.L. The magnetotransport measurements in 14T PPMS was carried out by J.H., D.J.A., S.M.A.R., Z.Q.M. and L.S. The high field measurements at NHMFL were conducted J.H., D.G., S.M.A.R., I.C., L.S. and Z.Q.M. A.C, Y.W. and J.W. contributed to structure characterization and crystal quality examination. J.H., D.G., A.C. and Z.Q.M. conducted data analyses. J.H and Z.Q.M. wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to scientific discussions and read and commented on the manuscript. This project was supervised by Z.Q.M.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, J., Liu, J., Graf, D. et al. π Berry phase and Zeeman splitting of Weyl semimetal TaP. Sci Rep 6, 18674 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing