Abstract
Prolactin (PRL) has numerous actions in mammalian biological systems including mammary development and biological processes. The aim of this study was to investigate the seasonal changes of prolactin receptor (PRLR) expression in the scented gland of muskrat during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. Histologically, glandular cells, interstitial cells and excretory tubules were identified in the scented glands in both seasons, whereas epithelial cells were sparse in the nonbreeding season. PRLR was observed in glandular cells of scented glands during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons with stronger immunostaining during the breeding season. Consistent with the immunohistochemical results, both the mean of protein and mRNA levels of PRLR were higher in the scented glands of the breeding season and relatively lower level in the nonbreeding season. In addition, differential seasonal changes were also detected in the expression profile of microRNAs (miRNAs) in the scented gland of muskrat. Besides, plasma PRL concentration was remarkably higher in the breeding season than that in the nonbreeding season. These results suggested that muskrat scented gland was the direct target organ of PRL and stronger expression of PRLR in scented glands during the breeding season indicated that PRL may directly regulate scented glandular function of the muskrats.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Prolactin (PRL) is mainly synthesized and secreted by the lactotrop cells of the pituitary1. Native PRL is secreted as a protein of approximately 23 kDa, cleavage of the full-length product by cathepsin D results in 16 kDa N-terminal PRL2. More than 300 separate actions have been reported in various vertebrates, including effects on water and salt balance, growth and development, endocrinology and metabolism, brain and behavior, reproduction and immune regulation and protection3,4,5,6. Circulating PRL is also detected in males, although it is present at lower levels than in females. In males, PRL is known to influence reproductive functions but the significance and mechanisms of PRL action in male organs and tissues are poorly understood.
PRL mediates its physiologic functions through the engagement of prolactin receptor (PRLR), a member of the cytokine receptor superfamily. PRLR is a transmembrane protein comprising an extracellular domain, a transmembrane domain and an intracellular domain. Multiple isoforms of membrane-bound PRLR resulting from alternative splicing of the primary transcript have been identified3. These different PRLR isoforms (short and long) differ in the length and composition of their cytoplasmic tail. Most of them are similar in their extracellular domain, but differ in the intracellular part7. Thus, multiple isoforms potentially can activate distinct intracellular signaling events. Generally, the most abundant PRLR is the long isoform, whereas other intermediate and short forms also exist. The long receptor isoform was studied in detail and specific functions of the other PRLR isoforms are relatively less investigated6. Upon ligand binding and sequential dimerisation, it activates multiple signaling systems including JAK2/STAT5, STAT3, MAPK p44/42 and PI3K pathways3,7,8,9,10. PRLR expression has been reported in a wide variety of cells and tissues. In male, experimental studies in animals and human suggest that PRL may via PRLR promote the function of the testis, prostate and reproductive accessory tissues11,12,13 and including the reproductive processes of species that breed seasonally such as golden hamsters, black bears (spring), sheep, rams and deer (autumn)14,15,16.
The muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus) is a medium-sized, semi-aquatic rodent that lives throughout North America, except in parts of the South where tidal fluctuation, periodic flooding, or drought limit their distribution17. The common name of the muskrat is derived from the conspicuous odor of secretions from paired perineal musk glands found beneath the skin at the ventral base of the tail18. The muskrat is a seasonal breeder with sexually active period of about 8 months from March to October. Increasing daylength of the breeding period is accompanied by increased release of pituitary gonadotrophins and marked testicular recrudescence, leading to enhanced testosterone production, spermatogenesis and pronounced testicular growth19. Additionally, to attract female muskrat during the breeding season, the males’ scented glands secrete musk (perfume substances), which is also a widely-used and costly ingredient in traditional Chinese medicine20. Our previous studies showed that as the target organ of androgens and estrogens, scented glands of the muskrats are capable of synthesizing androgens, estrogens as well as inhibins during the breeding season, which may play important autocrine or paracrine roles in mediating scented gland function17,21,22. Moreover, seasonal change of androgen receptor (AR) expression in scented glands during the breeding season and the nonbreeding season suggested that androgen may directly influence the glandular function19. Extensive studies have demonstrated that microRNAs (miRNAs) are important regulators of target gene expression at the post-transcriptional level and are involved in a broad range of biological processes such as metabolism, tissue morphogenesis, development, differentiation, reproduction and occurrence of several diseases23,24,25. Thus, miRNAs might also play an important role in regulating the development of scented gland of muskrat. However, up to date, the seasonal changes in the expression profile of miRNAs in the scented gland of muskrat during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons remain largely unknown. In this study, we investigated PRLR expression and localization as well as expression profile of miRNAs of the scented gland of muskrats during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons, to gain insight into the relationship of PRL and PRLR with regard to scented gland function of muskrats.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Twelve adult male muskrats were obtained in January (the nonbreeding season) and April (the breeding season) 2012 from Xichuan Wangnong Muskrat Breeding Farm, Beijing, China. All the animals were treated in accordance with the National Animal Welfare Legislation. All experimental procedures were approved by the Animal Ethic Committee at Experimental Center of Beijing Forestry University in accordance to the guidelines. Each pair of scented glands and testes was excised from the male muskrats after sacrifice. Weights and sizes of scented glands and testes were recorded after measured. One side of scented glands and testes were fixed immediately for 12 h in Bouin’s solution or 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.05 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS), pH 7.4 for histological and immunohistochemical observations; the other side of scented glands and testes were immediately stored at −80 °C for western blotting and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) detections. Blood samples were collected and centrifuged at 3000 g for 20 min to separate serum from blood cells, which were collected and stored at −20 °C for hormonal analysis.
Histology
The scented glandular and testicular samples were dehydrated in ethanol series and embedded in paraffin wax. Serial sections (4 μm) were mounted on slides coated with poly-L-lysine. Some sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE) for observations of general histology. The rest of the sections were processed for immunohistochemistry.
Immunohistochemistry
The serial sections of tests and scented glands were incubated with 10% normal goat serum to reduce background staining caused by the second antibody. The sections were then incubated with primary antibodies (1:1000) raised against PRLR (H-300) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) for 12 h under 4 °C. The sections were then incubated with a secondary antibody, goat anti-rabbit lgG conjugated with biotin and peroxidase with avidin, using a rabbit ExtrAvidin staining kit (Sigma, MO, USA), followed by visualizing with 30 mg 3,3-diaminobenzidine (Wako, Tokyo, Japan) solution in 150 ml of 0.05 mol Tris–HCl l−1 buffer, pH 7.6, plus 30 μl H2O2. To value the specificity of the polyclonal antibodies, PRLR antibody was performed in the mammary of muskrat, which are known to express the protein. Sections treated with pre-absorped primary antibodies were used as negative controls. The control sections were also treated with normal rabbit serum instead of the primary antisera.
Western blotting
Scented glandular tissue was divided into small pieces with a clean razor blade. The tissue was homogenized in a homogenizer containing 300 μl of 10 mg/ml PMSF stock and incubated on ice for 30 min to maintain the temperature at 4 °C throughout all the procedures. Following centrifugation at 12000 g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was collected. Protein extracts (25 μg) were mixed with an equal volume of 2× Laemmli sample buffer. Equal amounts of each sample were loaded and run on a 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS–PAGE) gel at 18 V/cm and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a wet transblotting apparatus (Bio-Rad, Richmond, CA, USA). Membranes were blocked with 3% albumin from bovine serum (BSA) for 1 h at room temperature. The membranes were washed and incubated with a 1:1000 PRLR primary antibody for 1 h. Secondary incubation of the membrane was then carried out using a 1:1000 dilution of goat anti-rabbit IgG tagged with horseradish peroxidase for 60 min. Finally, the membrane was colored with 10 mg 3,3-diaminobenzidine solution in 50 ml phosphate buffer (0.03 M) plus 3 μl H2O2. Antibodies pre-absorptions were also performed here as a negative control.
RT-PCR
The first-strand cDNA from total RNA (six samples for each season) was synthesized using StarScript II Reverse Transcriptase and Oligo (dT)18 by TIANScript RT Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The 20 μl of reaction mixture contained 3 μg of total RNA, 1 μl of Oligo (dT)18, 1 μl of 10 mM deoxy-ribonucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 4 μl of 250 Mm Tris–HCl (pH 8.3), 375 mM KCl and 15 mM MgCl2, 2 μl of 0.1 M dithiothreitol, 0.5 μl of RNase Inhibitor and 200 U of StarScript II enzyme. The 25 μl of reaction mixture contained 2 μl of first-strand cDNA, 0.5 μM each primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM dNTP, 20 mM Tris–HCl (pH 8.4) and 2.5 U of Taq polymerase (Tiangen, Beijing, China). The amplification was under the following condition: 94 °C for 3 min for the initial denaturation of the RNA/ cDNA hybrid, 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 51 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 1 min with a final extension of 10 min at 72 °C. The PRLR cDNA fragment was amplified by primers 5′-CGCTCTCCTGACAAGGAAAC -3′ and 5′-GGGACCATTTTACCCACAGA -3′. The primer set was intron spanning. The PCR product was electrophoresed in the 1% agarose gel and individual bands were visualized by ethidium bromide (EB) staining. Breast tissues of muskrat were used as positive control and water, instead of cDNA, was used as negative control. The housekeeping gene, Actb (the gene which encodes β-actin), was selected as the endogenous control. The bands were quantified using Quantity One software (Version 4.5, Bio-Rad Laboratories) and expression ratios were calculated.
MicroRNAs-sequencing and bioinformatic analysis
The small RNA (sRNA) libraries for the scented gland of muskrat from breeding season (named: SGB1) and nonbreeding season (named: SGNB2) were constructed from total RNAs using the Illumina Truseq Small RNA Preparation kit (RS-930–1012, Illumina Inc., USA) and were sequenced on the Illumina GAIIx platform following the vendor’s recommended protocol at Beijing Yuanquanyike Biological Technology Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). A proprietary pipeline script, ACGT101-miR v4.2 (LC Sciences, Houston, TX, USA), was utilized to analyze the sequencing data. The sRNAs were annotated by comparison with the deposited sequences in the NCBI GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and the Rfam11.0 databases (http://rfam.sanger.ac.uk/). The remaining sequences were used to BLAST search against miRBase (version 20, http://www.mirbase.org/) to identify known miRNAs. Potential novel miRNAs candidates were predicted by Mireap (version 0.2, http://sourceforge.net/projects/mireap/). Potential target genes regulated by miRNAs were predicted using the miRanda (version 3.3a, http://www.microrna.org/microrna/). R software was utilized to analyze the correlation between differential expression profile of miRNAs and their targeted genes. The biological functions of miRNA-targeted gene candidates were revealed by Gene Ontology enrichment (GO, http://www.geneontology.org/) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG, http://www.genome.jp/kegg/) analyses.
Hormone Assays
The plasma samples from each animal were analyzed by the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to detect the plasma PRL concentrations using the commercial Prolactin Rat ELISA Kit (CSB-E06881r).
Statistical analysis
Statistical comparisons were made with the Students t-test and One-way analysis of variance. A value of p < 0.05 was considered indication of statistical significance.
Results
Histology and Immunohistochemistry
Glandular cells, interstitial cells and epithelial cells of the excretory duct were observed in the scented glands of male muskrats both during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons (Fig. 1a,b), which was in accordance with our previous studies19,21. Glandular cells which secreted musk were the main cell type in the scented glands of male muskrat. During the nonbreeding season, epithelial cells were sparser and interstitial cells among glandular cells turned thicker than the breeding season. HE staining also revealed that all types of germ cells were shown in the breeding season in muskrat testes, while only spermatogonia and primary spermatocytes could be identified in the nonbreeding season (Fig. 1c,d). Immunolocalization for PRLR was detected in scented glands of muskrat in the breeding and nonbreeding seasons (Fig. 1e,f). Immunoreactivity for PRLR was present in glandular and epithelial cells during the breeding season (Fig. 1e), while only in glandular cells in the nonbreeding season (Fig. 1f). For positive control, PRLR was expressed in breast cells of the muskrat (Fig. 1g). The specificity of the antibody was confirmed, as a substantial decrease in immunostaining intensity was observed after pre-absorption with the specific recombinant proteins (Fig. 1e’), which is comparable to the negative control treated with normal rabbit serum instead of primary antisera (Fig. 1h).
Western Boltting and RT-PCR
The protein level of PRLR in scented gland of muskrats during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons was shown in Fig. 2a. A PRLR-positive band of 75 kDa was identified in protein extracted from scented gland during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. The intensity of PRLR in the breeding season was significantly higher than the nonbreeding season. Protein extracted from breast of the breeding season in the muskrat and the primary antibody pre-absorbed with an excessive amount of the antigen was used as positive control (PC) and negative control (NC), respectively (Fig. 2a, land PC). Meanwhile, the expression of mRNA of PRLR during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons was shown in Fig. 2b, which was generally in line with protein expression level. The mRNA extracted from the breast in the breeding season was used as a positive control (PC) (Fig. 2b, land PC). The results were normalized to β-actin (Actb) and primers specific for PRLR were used to amplify a RT-PCR product of 335 bp. Densitometric analysis revealed a significant increase in mRNA level during the breeding season as compared to the nonbreeding season. Compared with rat, mouse, bovine and human sequences, the PRLR cDNA nucleotide sequence identity was 86.04%, 84.33%, 81.25%, 74.93%.
Plasma level profile of PRL
The concentrations of prolactin in the plasma of muskrats during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons were measured by ELISA. There was a significant decrease of PRL concentration from the breeding season (3.624 ± 0.322 ng/ml in April, p > 0.05) to the nonbreeding season (0.564 ± 0.106 ng/ml in January, p < 0.01) (Fig. 2c).
Seasonal changes in expression profile of microRNAs
In total, 56,843,144 raw reads (for SGB1: 28,127,272 raw reads; for SGNB2: 28,715,872 raw reads) were obtained by high-throughput sequencing using Illumina GAIIx platform and 32,880,214 clean reads (for SGB1: 15,217,382 clean reads, 54.10%; for SGNB2: 17,662,832 clean reads, 61.50%) remained for the further sRNAs digitalization analyses. As shown in Fig. 3a,b, sRNAs were distributed in the 15–32 nt length. All of the clean reads are summarized as the following categories: sum, anno (annotated), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), small nuclear RNA (snRNA), miRNA, other, unann (unannotated) (Table 1, additional file 1: Table S1; Fig. 3c,d). As for SGB1, the miRNAs have 5,270,234 total reads and 48,428 unique reads, representing 45.65% of total reads and 12.30% of unique clean reads. As for SGNB2, the miRNAs have 7,178,426 total reads and 65,132 unique reads, representing 55.48% of total reads and 7.21% of unique clean reads. Our data indicated that miRNA expression is abundant in the scented gland of muskrat, as a total of 2,464 known miRNAs and 161 predicted novel miRNAs were detected in the two stages. MiRNAs-sequencing in the scented gland of muskrat collected from the breeding and nonbreeding seasons revealed seasonal changes in the expression profile of miRNAs. Of the sixteen differentially expressed miRNAs, five miRNAs was significantly down-regulated during the breeding season compared to the nonbreeding season, while expression of eleven miRNAs was significantly up-regulated (Table 2).
Bioinformatic prediction for regulation of biological functions by differential microRNAs expression
GO enrichment and KEGG pathway analyses were performed to investigate the regulation of biological functions by these differentially expressed miRNAs. Some miRNA-targeted gene candidates of these differential expressed miRNAs were enriched in related circadian rhythm and reproduction pathways, such as melanogenesis, MAPK, Notch, NF-kappa B, Wnt, Calcium signaling pathways (Additional file 2, Table S2; Additional file 3, Fig. S1; Additional file 4, Fig. S2). For instance, mmu-miR-1b-5p shows differential seasonal expressions in the scented gland of muskrat and its target gene candidates were predominantly enriched in circadian rhythm, retinol metabolism and melanogenesis (Additional file 5, Table S3). The miRNA-target gene prediction indicated that the PRL and PRLR genes might be regulated by the differential seasonal expressions of miRNAs, such as mmu-miR-1b–5p, mmu-miR-5119, rno-miR-144–5p (Additional file 6, Table S4).
Discussion
The present study was the first to investigate the expression and distribution patterns of PRLR in male muskrat scented glands during the breeding and nonbreeding season. Our results demonstrated that immunoreactivities of PRLR was higher in muskrat scented glands of the breeding season when compared to that in the nonbreeding season. The differential expression of the scented gland of muskrat between the breeding and nonbreeding seasons might be regulated by miRNAs, which are significant post-transcriptional regulators of miRNAs-target genes, such as PRL and PRLR gene. In addition, the expression patterns of PRLR in musk scented glands were correlated with the changes of plasma concentrations of PRL and the histological results. These findings suggest that PRLR may be involved in the regulation of seasonal changes in the scented glandular function of muskrat.
PRL acts at several levels of male reproduction in many mammals, playing a role in steroidogenesis and gametogenesis in the testis and influencing the reproductive tract, sexual behavior and seasonal breeding15. The release of PRL depends on the photoperiod, with long days being stimulatory and short days inhibitory. Seasonal changes for plasma PRL levels in the male muskrats were first observed in this study and it showed that plasma PRL concentrations were higher in the breeding season and lower in the nonbreeding season, which is not unique to the male muskrats. Other seasonal breeders, such as golden hamsters, Suffolk rams, black bears and polar bears, showed similar seasonal changes in circulating PRL concentration in accordance with the annual reproductive cycles. In male golden hamster, the increasing serum PRL concentration were observed during longer days, PRL acts at multiple levels of the hypothalamic-pituitary-testicular axis and both directly and indirectly regulate seasonal transitions between periods of full testicular activity and testicular quiescence15,26. In the young adult Suffolk rams, the spring increase in prolactin secretion could target both the testes and the hypothalamic-pituitary system and were involved in the seasonal regulation of sexual function27. In the black bear, serum PRL levels were lowest in the nonbreeding season (December) and increased gradually from January until May, coincided with testicular recrudescence and the onset of the breeding season and preceded peak testosterone concentrations, which were achieved in the breeding season28,29. Similar study in polar bears also showed that highest levels of PRL were measured in the breeding season and testes reached maximal size in this period30. In our previous study, scented glandular recrudescence and regression of the muskrats synchronized with testicular recrudescence and regression19, both of which corresponded with the change of PRL level, as revealed by the present study. These findings implied that the changes of scented glandular function of muskrats might be involved in role of PRL, which speculated that PRL might play a regulatory role in the scented gland function of muskrats.
PRLR expression has been reported in a wide variety of cells and tissues. In male, PRLR was expressed in the testes and in various male accessory glands include vas deferens, epididymis, prostates and seminal vesicles11,13,31, which demonstrated that these organs might be direct targets of PRL, suggesting multiple regulatory roles for PRL in male reproductive tract. The present study demonstrated for the first time the expression of the PRLR gene and protein in the scented glands of the male muskrats during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons. PRLR was shown to possess a cytoplasmic localization in glandular tissues in each examined period and its cellular distribution was found to be restricted to glandular cells. These findings suggested that PRL may be required for not only growth and differentiation of glandular tissues, but also the secretory process of the mature gland.
Seasonal changes in testicular function are not only involved changes in circulating PRL but also involved seasonal changes in testicular PRLR32. Previous studies have demonstrated the testicular PRLR expression increased during testicular recrudescence among several species with seasonal changes in reproduction28,32,33,34. In the hamster, testicular abundance of PRLR mRNA increased in the breed season, coincident with a significant increase in serum PRL concentrations33. This finding is consistent with other studies that demonstrated a positive relationship between PRLR mRNA and serum PRL concentrations and it suggested that PRL up-regulates its own receptor in the breeding season28,35,36. In addition, the histological results of scented glands also showed that epithelial cells, interstitial cells and a large number of glandular cells were observed in scented glands during the breeding season. These findings suggested that the rise in PRLR expression level in the breeding season might be an adaptation to intensified PRLR action. The multifunction of PRL may range from growth stimulation to the initiation and maintenance of musk synthesis. In this study, for the first time, we profiled the expression of miRNAs in the scented gland of muskrats during the breeding and nonbreeding seasons, which showed significant seasonal differences. This suggests that miRNAs are regulated throughout the seasonal cycle of the secretory musk gland and lay the foundation for further functional analysis of candidate miRNAs in this particular process. As seasonal variations in miRNA expression correlates to changes in PRL level, it would also be of interest to dissect the functions of miRNAs with regard to PRL regulation. The present study demonstrated the seasonal pattern of scented glandular PRLR profile regulated by miRNAs, mRNA and protein expression is correlated with PRL levels and mass of scented glands, which reached high levels in the breeding period with lower levels in the non-breeding period. PRL signaling pathway displays significant crosstalk with the AR signaling pathway in prostate function13. PRL could induce expression of AR and enhanced androgen action13,37,38. Our recent studies demonstrated that steroidogenic enzymes were immunolocalized in muskrat testes and scented glands during the breeding season, muskrat scented glands were capable of locally synthesizing androgen21. Moreover, muskrat scented glands was identified to be the direct target organ of androgen and stronger expression of AR in scented glands and higher levels of testosterone (T) were observed in the breeding season, which suggested that androgens may directly influence scented glandular function of the muskrats19. Indeed, previous studies have demonstrated a positive relationship between PRL and T production12,30,39,40. PRL could stimulate steroidogenesis not only by up-regulating luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) but also by increasing stores of esterfied cholesterol and increasing 3beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (3β-HSD) and 17β-HSD activity in the mouse41,42,43. Taking together, our results suggest that the cooperative action of PRL and androgen may be involved in the regulation of seasonal changes in the scented glands of muskrats. As evidence in breast and prostate tumors showed that tumors are capable of local secretion of PRL, which in turn favors the tumor development in an autocrine/paracrine mechanism44, future studies will investigate whether the scented gland of the muskrat synthesizes PRL.
In conclusion, the present study provided new evidence supporting that muskrat scented gland is a target organ of PRL. High PRL level and strong expression of PRLR in the scented gland during the breeding season may be associated with the expression of specific miRNAs. The data presented here links PRL to the musk gland, a typical exocrine gland, thus represent a valuable addition to the current awareness of the PRL function.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Cao, H. et al. Seasonal Expression of Prolactin Receptor in the Scented Gland of Male Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus). Sci. Rep. 5, 15036; doi: 10.1038/srep15036 (2015).
References
Freeman, M. E., Kanyicska, B., Lerant, A. & Nagy, G. Prolactin: structure, function and regulation of secretion. Physiol Rev 80, 1523–1631 (2000).
Clapp, C., Thebault, S. & Martinez de la Escalera, G. Role of prolactin and vasoinhibins in the regulation of vascular function in mammary gland. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 13, 55–67 (2008).
Bole-Feysot, C., Goffin, V., Edery, M., Binart, N. & Kelly, P. A. Prolactin (PRL) and its receptor: actions, signal transduction pathways and phenotypes observed in PRL receptor knockout mice. Endocr Rev 19, 225–268 (1998).
Bernichtein, S., Touraine, P. & Goffin, V. New concepts in prolactin biology. J Endocrinol 206, 1–11 (2010).
Bachelot, A. & Binart, N. Reproductive role of prolactin. Reproduction 133, 361–369 (2007).
Ben-Jonathan, N., LaPensee, C. R. & LaPensee, E. W. What can we learn from rodents about prolactin in humans? Endocr Rev 29, 1–41 (2008).
Clevenger, C. V., Furth, P. A., Hankinson, S. E. & Schuler, L. A. The role of prolactin in mammary carcinoma. Endocr Rev 24, 1–27 (2003).
Goffin, V., Binart, N., Touraine, P. & Kelly, P. A. Prolactin: the new biology of an old hormone. Annu Rev Physiol 64, 47–67 (2002).
Swaminathan, G., Varghese, B. & Fuchs, S. Y. Regulation of prolactin receptor levels and activity in breast cancer. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 13, 81–91 (2008).
Clevenger, C. V. Roles and regulation of stat family transcription factors in human breast cancer. Am J Pathol 165, 1449–1460 (2004).
Hair, W. M., Gubbay, O., Jabbour, H. N. & Lincoln, G. A. Prolactin receptor expression in human testis and accessory tissues: localization and function. Mol Hum Reprod 8, 606–611 (2002).
Sanford, L. M. & Baker, S. J. Prolactin regulation of testosterone secretion and testes growth in DLS rams at the onset of seasonal testicular recrudescence. Reproduction 139, 197–207 (2010).
Goffin, V., Hoang, D. T., Bogorad, R. L. & Nevalainen, M. T. Prolactin regulation of the prostate gland: a female player in a male game. Nat Rev Urol 8, 597–607 (2011).
Curlewis, J. D. Seasonal prolactin secretion and its role in seasonal reproduction: a review. Reprod Fertil Dev 4, 1–23 (1992).
Bartke, A. Prolactin in the male: 25 years later. J Androl 25, 661–666 (2004).
Santiago-Moreno, J. et al. Differences in reproductive pattern between wild and domestic rams are not associated with inter-specific annual variations in plasma prolactin and melatonin concentrations. Domest Anim Endocrinol 28, 416–429 (2005).
Lu, L. et al. Immunolocalization of androgen receptor, aromatase cytochrome P450, estrogen receptor alpha and estrogen receptor beta proteins during the breeding season in scent glands of muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus). Zoolog Sci 28, 727–732 (2011).
Dorp., V. New macrocyclle compounds for the secretions of the civet cat and the muskrat. Recuei 92, 9–15 (1973).
Lu, L. et al. Seasonal expression of androgen receptor in scented gland of muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus). Gen Comp Endocrinol 204, 1–7 (2014).
Chen, Y. et al. Hiatological observation on musk-secreting scented gland in muskrat. Chin J Zool 42, 91–95 (2007).
Li, Q. et al. Immunohistochemical evidence: testicular and scented glandular androgen synthesis in muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus) during the breeding season. Eur J Histochem 55, e32 (2011).
Ma, X. et al. Immunolocalization of inhibin/activin subunit proteins during the breeding season in testes and scented glands of muskrats (Ondatra zibethicus). J Vet Med Sci 73, 1199–1205 (2011).
Carrington, J. C. & Ambros, V. Role of microRNAs in plant and animal development. Science 301, 336–338 (2003).
Ambros, V. The functions of animal microRNAs. Nature 431, 350–355 (2004).
Kloosterman, W. P. & Plasterk, R. H. The diverse functions of microRNAs in animal development and disease. Dev Cell 11, 441–450 (2006).
Bartke, A. Role of prolactin in reproduction in male mammals. Fed Proc 39, 2577–2581 (1980).
Sanford, L. M. & Dickson, K. A. Prolactin regulation of testicular development and sexual behavior in yearling Suffolk rams. Small Ruminant Research 77, 1–10 (2008).
Howell-Skalla, L. A., Bunick, D., Nelson, R. A. & Bahr, J. M. Testicular recrudescence in the male black bear (Ursus americanus): changes in testicular luteinizing hormone-, follicle-stimulating hormone- and prolactin-receptor ribonucleic acid abundance and dependency on prolactin. Biol Reprod 63, 440–447 (2000).
Tsubota, T., Nelson, R. A., Thulin, J. D., Howell, L. & Bahr, J. M. Annual changes in serum concentrations of prolactin in captive male black bears (Ursus americanus). J Reprod Fertil 104, 187–191 (1995).
Howell-Skalla, L. A., Cattet, M. R., Ramsay, M. A. & Bahr, J. M. Seasonal changes in testicular size and serum LH, prolactin and testosterone concentrations in male polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Reproduction 123, 729–733 (2002).
Jabbour, H. N., Clarke, L. A., McNeilly, A. S., Edery, M. & Kelly, P. A. Is prolactin a gonadotrophic hormone in red deer (Cervus elaphus)? Pattern of expression of the prolactin receptor gene in the testis and epididymis. J Mol Endocrinol 20, 175–182 (1998).
Bartke, A., Klemcke, H. G., Amador, A. & Van Sickle, M. Photoperiod and regulation of gonadotropin receptors. Ann N Y Acad Sci 383, 122–134 (1982).
Klemcke, H. G., Bartke, A. & Borer, K. T. Regulation of testicular prolactin and luteinizing hormone receptors in golden hamsters. Endocrinology 114, 594–603 (1984).
Tsutsui, K., Kawashima, S., Masuda, A. & Oishi, T. Effects of photoperiod and temperature on the binding of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) to testicular preparations and plasma FSH concentration in the Djungarian hamster, Phodopus sungorus. Endocrinology 122, 1094–1102 (1988).
Klemcke, H. G., Bartke, A., Steger, R., Hodges, S. & Hogan, M. P. Prolactin (PRL), follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone are regulators of testicular PRL receptors in golden hamsters. Endocrinology 118, 773–782 (1986).
Douglas, D. A. et al. Luteotropic hormone receptors in the ovary of the mink (Mustela vison) during delayed implantation and early-postimplantation gestation. Biol Reprod 59, 571–578 (1998).
Prins, G. S. Prolactin influence on cytosol and nuclear androgen receptors in the ventral, dorsal and lateral lobes of the rat prostate. Endocrinology 120, 1457–1464 (1987).
Jones, R., Riding, P. R. & Parker, M. G. Effects of prolactin on testosterone-induced growth and protein synthesis in rat accessory sex glands. J Endocrinol 96, 407–416 (1983).
Bartke, A., Smith, M. S., Michael, S. D., Peron, F. G. & Dalterio, S. Effects of experimentally-induced chronic hyperprolactinemia on testosterone and gonadotropin levels in male rats and mice. Endocrinology 100, 182–186 (1977).
Regisford, E. G. & Katz, L. S. Effects of bromocriptine-induced hypoprolactinaemia on gonadotrophin secretion and testicular function in rams (Ovis aries) during two seasons. J Reprod Fertil 99, 529–537 (1993).
Munabi, A. K. et al. The effects of prolactin on rat testicular steroidogenic enzyme activities. Horm Metab Res 17, 47–48 (1985).
Gunasekar, P. G., Kumaran, B. & Govindarajulu, P. Prolactin and Leydig cell steroidogenic enzymes in the bonnet monkey (Macaca radiata). Int J Androl 11, 53–59 (1988).
Bartke, A. Effects of prolactin and luteinizing hormone on the cholesterol stores in the mouse testis. J Endocrinol 49, 317–324 (1971).
Bernichtein S. et al. New concepts in prolactin biology. J Endocrinol 206, 1–11 (2010).
Acknowledgements
This study is supported by a Grant-in-Aid from National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, No. J1103516; No. J1310005; No. 31201768) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (8142029).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.C. wrote this manuscript text; Q.W., Z.Y. and Y.H. designed the experiments; L.W. and L.L. collected material for study; H.C., L.L., X.S. and S.Z. carried out the experiments and analyzed the data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Cao, H., Wang, L., Zhang, S. et al. Seasonal Expression of Prolactin Receptor in the Scented Gland of Male Muskrat (Ondatra zibethicus). Sci Rep 5, 15036 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15036
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep15036
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.