Abstract
We present experimental evidence for scale invariant behaviour of the excitation spectrum in phasefluctuating quasi1d Bose gases after a rapid change of the external trapping potential. Probing density correlations in free expansion, we find that the temperature of an initial thermal state scales with the spatial extension of the cloud as predicted by a model based on adiabatic rescaling of initial eigenmodes with conserved quasiparticle occupation numbers. Based on this result, we demonstrate that shortcuts to adiabaticity for the rapid expansion or compression of the gas do not induce additional heating.
Introduction
A systematic understanding of nonequilibrium dynamics in manybody quantum systems is a longstanding goal, with farreaching applicability for many different fields of physics. Ultracold atom experiments offer clean implementations of systems that are tunable, well isolated from the environment and theoretically tractable^{1,2}. In particular, the profound understanding available for the onedimensional (1d) Bose gas makes it an ideal test bed for quantum manybody dynamics^{3}.
Tunable parameters in the system's Hamiltonian allow the controlled preparation of nonequilibrium states^{4,5,6,7}. The identification of characteristic scaling laws is an important step for the concise description of the subsequent dynamical processes. Of particular importance are laws governing not only global parameters^{8,9,10} but ideally the full spectrum of excitations, as studied in recent experiments with 2d Bose^{11,12} or TonksGirardeau gases^{4,13}.
Recent work^{14} has shown that a general scaling property of manybody wavefunctions holds exactly for a broad class of systems, including the weakly interacting 1d Bose gas addressed in this Letter. The existence of such a scaling solution is a consequence of a dynamical symmetry of the underlying Hamiltonian. For an ultracold gas, fast changes of control parameters in the Hamiltonian generally lead to quasiparticle production and heating^{15}. The existence of a scaling solution for the full spectrum of quasiparticle modes implies that socalled shortcuts to adiabaticity (STA)^{16,17} can be engineered not only for the mean density profile of a 1d gas, but also for correlation properties of the system in certain regimes of interaction strength^{18,19}.
We show in this work that the scaling solutions for a true manybody wavefunction have their counterpart in the hydrodynamic regime of our experimental system. We bring our system out of equilibrium by rapidly changing its longitudinal confinement. The subsequent system evolution gives insight into the scaling properties of the gas. This allows us to study the regimes and limits of such a manipulation, with an emphasis on STA schemes. We furthermore demonstrate for the first time that STA schemes are valid for the secondorder correlation, and thereby the temperature, of weakly interacting 1d Bose gases.
Results and Discussion
In our experiments, we investigate the scaling solutions of hydrodynamic equations and how they can be applied for the rapid control of the complete wavefunction of a manybody quantum system.
We start with a single quasicondensate of several thousand ^{87}Rb atoms in an elongated trap on an atom chip^{20}. The initial temperatures are set between 50 nK and 150 nK and linear densities range between 50 atoms/μm and 200 atoms/μm. Axially, the cloud is deeply in the ThomasFermi regime. Radially, the gas is described by an interactionbroadened ground state wavefunction^{21,22,23}. For these parameters, both the chemical potential and the average thermal energy per particle fulfil the condition , where denotes the radial level spacing of the trap with frequency , so that scattering into radial excited states is strongly suppressed and an effective 1d system is realized^{24,20,25,21}. After evaporative cooling, we keep an RFshield 12 kHz above the trap bottom throughout our experiments to remove hot atoms. The cloud is probed by standard absorption imaging techniques after a 4 ms to 10 ms long phase of timeofflight expansion.
The geometry of the trap is governed by the current flow through a central Zshaped wire and two Ushaped control structures on the atom chip, as shown in figure 1(a). Panels (b)–(e) show two different trapping potentials calculated for currents tuned to A and A, as well as A and A. Varying and results in traps with axial confinement ranging from Hz to Hz, and radial confinement from Hz to Hz. A rapid change of the current ratio constitutes a quench of the trapping potential and induces excitations.
In our first set of experiments we probe the dynamical scaling of the phonon ensemble in the presence of an axial quadrupolemode collective excitation^{26} induced by such a quench. To this end, we employ a linear ramp from Hz to Hz, and from Hz to Hz, respectively, of duration τ. The ramps of the trapping potential were designed to avoid transverse excitations. We chose to maintain a constant transverse position to avoid inducing a corresponding sloshing of the cloud. The ramp duration was chosen to be longer than ms so that adiabaticity with respect to the change of transverse trap frequency is fulfilled. Axial dipole oscillations are suppressed by the symmetric arrangement of the control wires.
We probe phononic excitations in the quasicondensate using a thermometry scheme based on the analysis of density correlations in free expansion^{27,28}, as shown in the inset of figure 2(a). To extract the temperature we compare the measured density correlation functions with the results of a stochastic model^{29}. Our analysis accounts for the effects of the collective excitation on the free expansion (see methods section below), and for the finite resolution of our imaging system.
Figure 2 summarises our temperature measurements following a quench. We show data for ramp times of 10 and 30 ms and mean atom numbers of 11000 and 16000, compared to the behaviour expected from a scaling model building upon the results of Ref^{14}.
The scale invariance of the underlying Hamiltonian allows to calculate timedependent correlation functions: In the ThomasFermi regime, the density profile exhibits selfsimilar scaling described bywith a timedependent scale factor . Here, and denote the initial ThomasFermi radius and peak density, respectively, is the Heaviside function and z represents the axial coordinate. The scale factor obeys an Ermakovlike equation^{31}Using the rescaled meanfield density (1), we can write the linearised hydrodynamic equations for density and velocity fluctuations and , disregarding the quantum pressure term, asandTo solve these equations we introduce an ansatz of rescaled eigenmodes for density and phase fluctuations. This approach yields a set of uncoupled equations and hence no mixing of modes, finally predicting an adiabatic time evolution of the corresponding occupation numbers. For a thermal state, the initial phonon occupation numbers are given by a Bose distributionAdiabaticity results in a constant ratio . The spectrum at is given by^{32} with mode index l and initial sound velocity . For , it scales as , due to the timedependence of the sound velocity and radius . Hence, for an initial state in thermal equilibrium, we obtain the temperature scalingThe density correlations in free expansion that our thermometry scheme relies on are governed by the coherence function. For a thermal state with homogeneous density, as realised in the vicinity of the cloud center, it has the form^{20,32}:where denotes the density at time and the Boltzmann constant. Based on our model, the coherence function is expected to scale as
Figure 3 summarizes the first central result of our experiments: The inset shows absolute temperatures plotted against measured ThomasFermi radii. If the measured temperatures are scaled to the initial temperature and plotted against the scale parameter , the datasets collapse onto a single line. This illustrates a scaling behaviour that is universal in sense that it is independent of absolute temperature, density or quench time. To validate our results we furthermore performed numerical simulations based on a stochastic GrossPitaevskii equation (SGPE)^{33,34,35,36}, showing excellent agreement with the scaling model (fig. 3).
So far, we considered the dynamics induced by a linear ramp of the trapping potential. In the following, we demonstrate the conservation of phonon occupation numbers during shortcuts to adiabaticity^{31,18,17} for the rapid expansion and compression of a 1d quasiBEC. To implement these shortcuts, we make use of an optimal control approach that is in spirit similar to the method proposed in ref. 37. We numerically solve the timedependent 1d GPE with a suitable parametrisation of the trap which is subject to a global optimization procedure based on a genetic algorithm^{38,39}. The ramp speed is limited by the requirement of adiabaticity in the transverse degree of freedom. This constraint also guarantees that the gas remains in the 1d hydrodynamic regime, and that the interaction strength varies slowly with time. The properties of the ultracold gas therefore remain consistent with the conditions necessary for the validity of the microscopic scaling laws^{14} throughout the ramp.
The upper panel in figure 4 shows a comparison between simulation and experiment for a linear and a shortcut ramp performing a decompression within 30 ms from a trap with frequencies Hz and Hz to Hz and Hz. The subsequent dynamics is observed throughout a period of 170 ms, each picture taken after a short free expansion time of 5 ms, showing excellent agreement with simulations. It is interesting to note that our shortcut ramps are similar to theoretical results derived from a counterdiabatic driving method reported recently^{19}.
For the STA, we expect an adiabatic state change, defined by . The temperature measurements, corrected for the measured heating rate, are in good agreement with the adiabatic prediction of for the implemented decompression shortcut, confirming that there is no additional heating during the applied procedure.
Conclusion
In summary, we have characterised the temperature of the phonon ensemble in a breathing quasi1d Bose gas for different initial conditions, and used it to test the predicted dynamical scale invariance in the excitation spectrum of a quasi1d Bose gas. Following these scaling laws, we have experimentally demonstrated rapid adiabatic expansion and compression of a 1d Bose gas in the hydrodynamic regime, allowing fast transformation of the trapped cloud without additional heating.
Our work is only the beginning for studies of manybody scaling solutions and shortcuts to adiabaticity. The existence of scaling solutions has been proposed for a large class of cold atom systems^{14}. In principle, this opens up the interesting possibility to apply the techniques applied here to a variety of settings, such as fermionic systems or the 1d Bose gas with intermediate or strong interactions. We expect that studying the effect of quasiparticle interactions on the implementation of shortcuts to adiabaticity will shed new light on the complex manybody dynamics in these systems, in addition to providing novel tools for their controlled manipulation.
We expect that such extensions to studies in regimes of greater interaction strength, and to systems out of thermal equilibrium, will benefit from the tools presented in this work.
Methods
Condensate preparation and detection
We employ standard cooling and magnetic trapping techniques^{40} to prepare ultracold quasionedimensional samples of 87Rubidium atoms in the state on an atom chip^{20,41}. Atom chips feature microfabricated wire structures to create fields for atom trapping and manipulation^{42}. The structures used in our experiments are produced by masked vapor depositon of a 2 μm gold layer on a silicon substrate, with a width of both trapping and control wires of 200 μm. For detection, we employ resonant absorption imaging^{43} using a high quantumefficiency CCD camera (Andor iKonM 934 BRDD) and a diffractionlimited optical imaging system characterised by an Airy radius of 4.5 μm. The RF shield at 12 kHz above the bottom of the trap is used to limit the number of atoms in the thermal background cloud populating transverse excited states of the trap, which would otherwise adversely affect our thermometry scheme by reduction of interference contrast in free expansion.
Characterization of the breathing mode
We characterise the breathing mode excited by a linear trap frequency ramp from Hz to Hz, and Hz to Hz, respectively, in figure 5. As an example, the upper panel shows the time evolution of the cloud radius after a ramp with duration τ = 12.5 ms. Fitting data as presented here allows us to extract frequencies, damping rates and amplitudes of the breathing mode. The frequency is influenced by the total atom number in the trap, and is expected to vary with the axial trap frequency between in the 1d limit, and representing the elongated 3d regime^{26}. The amplitude strongly depends on the duration and shape of the trap frequency ramp. The lower panel in figure 5 shows a comparison of measured breathing amplitudes for different ramp times between 2 ms and 100 ms with results calculated with a 1d GrossPitaevskii equation (GPE), taking into account corrections to the interaction term relevant in the 1d/3d crossover regime^{44}, and shows good agreement in the chosen parameter range.
Thermometry
In this work we use the thermometry scheme proposed and demonstrated in ref. 28,27 based on the analysis of density correlations in freely expanding phasefluctuating quasi1d condensates and comparison with numerically calculated density profiles^{29}.
Breathing contributes a velocity field characterized by the derivative of the scale parameter , leading to an additional axial compression or expansion of the density profile during free expansion. This effect can be accounted for by an additional phase factorin the numerics, where b and are determined by fits to the measured breathing oscillations. The error on the temperature measurements is estimated by a bootstrapping method as outlined in ref. 30.
Derivation of the temperature scaling
The general conditions for the existence of a scaling solution are stated in reference^{14}. For the 1d Bose gas, they are fulfilled in the presence of contact interactions, as well as a harmonic, linear or vanishing axial trapping potential. Given that our system is a 1d quasicondensate, and the trapping potential is harmonic, we can derive the corresponding hydrodynamic scaling relations for correlation functions. Our starting point is the selfsimilar scaling of the density profile: denotes the Heaviside function, the initial ThomasFermi radius and b the scale parameter. Similar to the discussion of the corresponding equilibrium problem^{32}, a scaling solution in terms of eigenmodes for density and velocity fluctuations and can be formulated asandwith the Legendre polynomials , the interaction constant g, rescaled coordinates , and timedependent amplitudes and . denotes the frequency of the oscillation between the quadratures of the mode l. Correspondingly, the initial equilibrium spectrum scales asSubstituting and into the linearised Euler equationswhere we have disregarded the quantum pressure term, yieldsSince the characteristic inverse time scale of the breathing mode is small compared to the characteristic frequencies of the phonon modes with , we can average over rapid oscillations of and to reduce these expressions to and , and the phonon modes are expected to scale adiabatically. Then the initial number of phonons in a thermal state,is conserved, resulting inThis leads to the observed temperature scaling .
The decay of the coherence function of a quasicondensate is dominated by phase noise^{45}. We can express phase fluctuations in terms of velocity fluctuations using the relationwhere
Therefore the relation between initial and timedependent modes readsThe timedependent onebody reduced density matrix can be expressed aswithas well as and . Using , we can write the density matrix (20) in terms of the modes given in equation (19). Substituting and following the steps in reference^{45}, we find that near the cloud center, where the density is practically uniform and we can use trigonometric approximations for ^{46},with a coherence length . This corresponds to a transformation of the formas predicted in reference^{14}, with the difference that the spatial coordinates scale with instead of . This difference is a consequence of the the ThomasFermi approximation. In the hydrodynamic regime, scale invariance therefore holds even if the interaction strength is kept constant. In contrast, reference^{14} assumes a suitable tuning of the interaction constant, thereby yielding an exact solution valid for arbitrary values of the LiebLiniger parameter.
Heating
The temperature scaling satisfies the equationIn our experiment we observe heating during evolution times of several hundreds of milliseconds. We find that all our measurements are compatible with a linear increase of temperature over time, which can be represented by adding a constant heating term to the equation:This equation is solved by , with given by The integral can be calculated numerically and α corresponds to the regular heating rate in units of the initial temperature for constant b.
Finite temperature simulations
We solve a stochastic 1d GrossPitaevskii equation (SGPE)^{33,34,35,36} of the formwhereHere μ denotes an external chemical potential, and is a damping coefficient that is coupled to the δcorrelated noise term η via a fluctuationdissipation theorem:Repeated solution of the SGPE yields a set of independent wave functions representing a thermal state. We use this state as initial condition for propagation with a timedependent GrossPitaevskii Hamiltonian without any noise or damping terms. Such an approach has previously been applied to model condensate formation in atom chip traps^{47} and is very similar to other classical field methods based on stochastic sampling of initial conditions^{48,49}. The simulation results are analysed with the same procedures as the experimental data.
Change history
13 July 2015
A correction has been published and is appended to both the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.
References
 1.
Polkovnikov, A., Sengupta, K., Silva, A. & Vengalattore, M. Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863–883 (2011).
 2.
Rigol, M., Dunjko, V. & Olshanii, M. Thermalization and its mechanism for generic isolated quantum systems. Nature 452, 854–8 (2008).
 3.
Cazalilla, M. A., Citro, R., Giamarchi, T., Orignac, E. & Rigol, M. One dimensional bosons: From condensed matter systems to ultracold gases. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1405–1466 (2011).
 4.
Kinoshita, T., Wenger, T. & Weiss, D. S. A quantum Newton's cradle. Nature 440, 900–3 (2006).
 5.
Sadler, L. E., Higbie, J. M., Leslie, S. R., Vengalattore, M. & StamperKurn, D. M. Spontaneous symmetry breaking in a quenched ferromagnetic spinor BoseEinstein condensate. Nature 443, 312–5 (2006).
 6.
Cheneau, M. et al. Lightconelike spreading of correlations in a quantum manybody system. Nature 481, 484–487 (2012).
 7.
Gring, M. et al. Relaxation and prethermalization in an isolated quantum system. Science 337, 1318–1322 (2012).
 8.
Kagan, Y., Surkov, E. L. & Shlyapnikov, G. V. Evolution of a Bosecondensed gas under variations of the confining potential. Phys. Rev. A 54, R1753–R1756 (1996).
 9.
Castin, Y. & Dum, R. BoseEinstein Condensates in Time Dependent Traps. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5315–5319 (1996).
 10.
Chevy, F., Bretin, V., Rosenbusch, P., Madison, K. W. & Dalibard, J. Transverse Breathing Mode of an Elongated BoseEinstein Condensate. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 250402 (2002).
 11.
Pitaevskii, L. P. & Rosch, A. Breathing modes and hidden symmetry of trapped atoms in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. A 55, 853–856 (1997).
 12.
Hung, C.. L. Zhang, X., Gemelke, N. & Chin, C. Observation of scale invariance and universality in twodimensional Bose gases. Nature 470, 236–9 (2011).
 13.
Minguzzi, A. & Gangardt, D. M. Exact Coherent States of a Harmonically Confined TonksGirardeau Gas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 240404 (2005).
 14.
Gritsev, V., Barmettler, P. & Demler, E. Scaling approach to quantum nonequilibrium dynamics of manybody systems. New J. Phys. 12, 113005 (2010).
 15.
Fedichev, P. & Fischer, U. Cosmological quasiparticle production in harmonically trapped superfluid gases. Phys. Rev. A 69, 033602 (2004).
 16.
Chen, X., Ruschhaupt, A., Schmidt, S. & Muga, J. G. Shortcut to adiabaticity in harmonic traps. J. At. Mol. Sci. 1, 1–17 (2010).
 17.
Schaff, J.. F.., Capuzzi, P., Labeyrie, G. & Vignolo, P. Shortcuts to adiabaticity for trapped ultracold gases. New J. Phys. 13, 113017 (2011).
 18.
del Campo, A. Frictionless quantum quenches in ultracold gases: A quantumdynamical microscope. Phys. Rev. A 84, 4–7 (2011).
 19.
del Campo, A. Shortcuts to Adiabaticity by Counterdiabatic Driving. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 100502 (2013).
 20.
Reichel, J. & Vuletic, V. Atom Chips. Atom Chips (Wiley, 2010).
 21.
Salasnich, L., Parola, A. & Reatto, L. Effective wave equations for the dynamics of cigarshaped and diskshaped Bose condensates. Phys. Rev. A 65, 43614 (2002).
 22.
Krüger, P., Hofferberth, S., Mazets, I. E., Lesanovsky, I. & Schmiedmayer, J. Weakly Interacting Bose Gas in the OneDimensional Limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 265302 (2010).
 23.
Amerongen, A. H. V., Es, J. J. P. V., Wicke, P., Kheruntsyan, K. V. & Druten, N. J. V. YangYang Thermodynamics on an Atom Chip. Phys. Rev. Lett. 090402, 13–15 (2008).
 24.
Görlitz, A. et al. Realization of BoseEinstein Condensates in Lower Dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 130402 (2001).
 25.
Stringari, S. Dynamics of BoseEinstein condensed gases in highly deformed traps. Phys. Rev. A 58, 2385–2388 (1998).
 26.
Menotti, C. & Stringari, S. Collective oscillations of a onedimensional trapped BoseEinstein gas. Phys. Rev. A 66, 043610 (2002).
 27.
Manz, S. et al. Twopoint density correlations of quasicondensates in free expansion. Phys. Rev. A 81, 1–4 (2010).
 28.
Imambekov, A. et al. Density ripples in expanding lowdimensional gases as a probe of correlations. Phys. Rev. A 80, 1–14 (2009).
 29.
Stimming, H.. F.., Mauser, N. J., Schmiedmayer, J. & Mazets, I. E. Fluctuations and Stochastic Processes in OneDimensional ManyBody Quantum Systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 015301 (2010).
 30.
Kuhnert, M. et al. Multimode Dynamics and Emergence of a Characteristic Length Scale in a OneDimensional Quantum System. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 090405 (2013).
 31.
Chen, X., Lizuain, I., Ruschhaupt, A., GuéryOdelin, D. & Muga, J. G. Shortcut to Adiabatic Passage in Two and ThreeLevel Atoms. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 123003 (2010).
 32.
Petrov, D., Shlyapnikov, G. & Walraven, J. T. M. Regimes of Quantum Degeneracy in Trapped 1D Gases. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3745–3749 (2000).
 33.
Stoof, H. T. C. Coherent Versus Incoherent Dynamics During BoseEinstein Condensation in Atomic Gases. J. Low Temp. Phys. 114, 11–109 (1999).
 34.
Duine, R. & Stoof, H. Stochastic dynamics of a trapped BoseEinstein condensate. Phys. Rev. A 65, 013603 (2001).
 35.
Gardiner, C., Anglin, J. & Fudge, T. The stochastic GrossPitaevskii equation. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, 1555–1582 (2002).
 36.
Cockburn, S. P., Gallucci, D. & Proukakis, N. P. Quantitative study of quasionedimensional Bose gas experiments via the stochastic GrossPitaevskii equation. Phys. Rev. A 84, 023613 (2011).
 37.
Caneva, T., Calarco, T. & Montangero, S. Chopped randombasis quantum optimization. Phys. Rev. A 84, 022326 (2011).
 38.
Holland, J. H. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence. A Bradford book (M.I.T.P., 1992).
 39.
Rohringer, W. et al. Stochastic optimization of a cold atom experiment using a genetic algorithm. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 264101 (2008).
 40.
Wildermuth, S. et al. Optimized magnetooptical trap for experiments with ultracold atoms near surfaces. Phys. Rev. A 69, 030901 (2004).
 41.
Folman, R. et al. Controlling cold atoms using nanofabricated surfaces: atom chips. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4749–52 (2000).
 42.
Groth, S. et al. Atom chips: Fabrication and thermal properties. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2980 (2004).
 43.
Smith, D. A. et al. Absorption imaging of ultracold atoms on atom chips. Opt. Express 19, 8471–85 (2011).
 44.
Gerbier, F. Quasi1D BoseEinstein condensates in the dimensional crossover regime. Europhys. Lett. 66, 771–777 (2004).
 45.
Mora, C. & Castin, Y. Extension of Bogoliubov theory to quasicondensates. Phys. Rev. A 67, 053615 (2003).
 46.
Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, vol. 55 of National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series (For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing OfficeWashington, D.C., 1964).
 47.
Proukakis, N., Schmiedmayer, J. & Stoof, H. Quasicondensate growth on an atom chip. Phys. Rev. A 73, 053603 (2006).
 48.
Sinatra, A., Lobo, C. & Castin, Y. The truncated Wigner method for Bosecondensed gases: limits of validity and applications. J. Phys. B At. Mol. Opt. Phys. 35, 3599–3631 (2002).
 49.
Witkowska, E., Gajda, M. & Rzazewski, K. Monte Carlo method, classical fields and Bose statistics. Opt. Commun. 283, 671–675 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to M. Wilzbach, D. Heine and B. Hessmo for initial work building the experimental apparatus. We thank JF. Schaff, N. Proukakis, P. Grišins and B. Rauer for fruitful discussions. This work was supported by the Austrian FWF through the Wittgenstein Prize, the FFG project PLATON, the Doctoral Programme CoQuS (W1210), and the EU through the projects QuantumRelax (ERCADG320975) and SIQS. I.E.M. acknowledges the financial support from the FWF (project P22590N16).
Author information
Affiliations
Vienna Center for Quantum Science and Technology, Atominstitut, TU Wien, 1020 Vienna, Austria
 W. Rohringer
 , D. Fischer
 , F. Steiner
 , I. E. Mazets
 , J. Schmiedmayer
 & M. Trupke
Ioffe PhysicalTechnical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
 I. E. Mazets
Wolfgang Pauli Institute, 1090 Vienna, Austria
 I. E. Mazets
Authors
Search for W. Rohringer in:
Search for D. Fischer in:
Search for F. Steiner in:
Search for I. E. Mazets in:
Search for J. Schmiedmayer in:
Search for M. Trupke in:
Contributions
W.R. and D.F. performed the experiments and analysed the data. F.S. contributed to building the experiment and provided help with the data analysis. I.E.M. provided important advice for the execution of the scaling measurements and developed the theoretical model. W.R. devised the optimal control scheme and performed numerical simulations. J.S. and M.T. provided scientific guidance and funding for the experiment. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and the writing of the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Corresponding author
Correspondence to W. Rohringer.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Further reading

1.
Journal of Low Temperature Physics (2018)

2.
Journal of Low Temperature Physics (2018)

3.
Scientific Reports (2016)

4.
Shortcut to adiabatic control of soliton matter waves by tunable interaction
Scientific Reports (2016)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.