Introduction

The biology underlying RNAi is still only partially understood. Bacteria engineered to express dsRNA homologous to C. elegans genes can induce RNAi when fed to the animals1; transgenic plants engineered to express dsRNA against genes of plant-parasitic nematodes kill these nematodes when used as hosts2. Why any animal, or indeed C. elegans in particular, should respond to environmental dsRNA, is an exciting question that remains unanswered. We recently discussed some potential roles of environmental RNAi in animal to animal communication (“social RNA”)3.

Environmental RNAi in C. elegans is a multi-step process (Fig. 1a). First, dsRNA molecules from food are taken up by intestinal cells, a process that requires the dsRNA transporter SID-24. dsRNA and/or RNAi intermediates can move between cells and tissues of the animal, a phenomenon referred to as systemic RNAi, which requires SID-1 RNA channel and other protein factors5,6. Within cells dsRNA is processed by the DICER endonuclease (DCR-1)/RDE-4 complex, which generates short dsRNA7,8,9. Either of the strands of the short dsRNA, the 1° siRNA, is incorporated into the Argonaute protein RDE-110,11 and finds its target through primary sequence complementarity (Watson-Crick base-pairing). Upon target recognition, the RDE-1/1° siRNA complex recruits RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRPs) to generate 2° siRNAs, also known as 22G-RNAs12. 22G-RNAs associate with a different class of Argonaute proteins (WAGOs) and form the active RNAi effector complex. 22G-RNAs lead to gene silencing at both the post-transcriptional and transcriptional level13,14. Due to the RdRP amplification step, 22G-RNAs are highly abundant and are a key signature of RNAi in C. elegans (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1
figure 1

C. elegans exogenous RNAi pathway.

(a) Extracellular long dsRNA is taken up by the intestinal cells through SID-2 RNA transporter. Intracellular long dsRNAs are processed into short dsRNAs by the DICER/RDE-4 complex. Either of the strands of the short dsRNA can become the primary siRNA. Primary siRNAs form a complex with the Argonaute protein RDE-1 and find target sequences by sequence complementarity. Recruitment of RNA dependent RNA polymerase generates secondary siRNAs (22G-RNAs). (b) Different cloning strategies can differentiate between the primary and secondary siRNAs depending on their 5′ phosphate state.

C. elegans is a common animal model and the standard food source in the laboratory is E. coli. In nature C. elegans is associated with soil and decaying organic matter and is likely a generalist feeding on microorganisms such as bacteria15. Curiously, the E. coli stress-induced non-coding RNA OxyS16 has a 17 nucleotides (nt) region complementary to the sequence of the che-2 gene of C. elegans17 (Fig. 2). Recently, Liu et al.17 reported that the OxyS non-coding RNA causes down-regulation of the che-2 mRNA in C. elegans when expressed in the E. coli food. According to the genetic analysis of Liu et al.17, OxyS-dependent down-regulation of che-2 requires some of the components of the RNAi and miRNA pathways in C. elegans. Specifically, dcr-1 and rde-4, essential for long dsRNA processing during RNAi8,9, rde-1, the 1° siRNA binding Argonaute11,18 and alg-1, a microRNA (miRNA) pathway gene10, were all reported to be required for che-2 mRNA regulation17. Surprisingly, the systemic RNAi genes sid-15 and sid-24 were found to be dispensible17. The authors concluded that the OxyS RNA elicits an RNAi response in C. elegans that results in gene expression changes and behavioral responses.

Figure 2
figure 2

E. coli OxyS non-coding RNA.

Nucleotides complementary to the C. elegans che-2 gene are highlighted in red.

Results

To test this hypothesis directly, we fed three different E. coli strains to C. elegans either for one or three generations: an OxyS over-expressing strain (AZ121), an OxyS deletion strain (GS035) and the common C. elegans food strain (HB101). We isolated total RNA from young adult stage animals and prepared 5′ independent small RNA libraries which enables the sequencing of both 1° and 2° siRNAs12 (Fig. 1b). We then mapped the small RNA reads against the OxyS non-coding RNA. We did not detect any small RNAs mapping to the OxyS RNA in animals fed with either the OxyS deletion strain or the HB101 E. coli strain (data not shown). In animals fed with the AZ121 strain, small RNAs mapping to the OxyS RNA show a peak at 21–22 nt both in one or three generation fed animals (Fig. 3, top two panels). However, these small RNAs map exclusively to the 3′ region of the OxyS RNA. We did not detect any small RNAs mapping to the region of the OxyS RNA that is predicted to share sequence similarity to the che-2 mRNA (Fig. 3, bottom two panels). To test whether Dicer activity was involved in the generation of these small RNAs, we repeated the feeding experiment using rde-4 mutant animals (Fig. 3, top and bottom third panels). Small RNA reads from rde-4 mutants showed a very similar pattern to those from wild-type animals with abundant 21–22 nt RNAs mapping exclusively to the 3′ region of the OxyS RNA. These results indicate that the DCR-1/RDE-4 complex is not required for the generation of these 21–22 nt small RNAs which originate from the OxyS RNA. Next, we checked for 22G-RNAs, which are the effectors of C. elegans RNAi pathway. We did not observe any 22G-RNAs mapping either against the OxyS RNA or the che-2 mRNA in our 5′ independent small RNA libraries, thus suggesting that there is no small RNA mediated silencing of che-2. Consistently, we also did not observe any down-regulation of the che-2 mRNA upon AZ121 feeding (Fig. 4).

Figure 3
figure 3

E. coli strain AZ121 with constitutive OxyS non-coding RNA expression does not induce RNAi in C. elegans upon feeding.

Small RNAs from one or three generation fed C. elegans larvae and the small RNAs from E. coli AZ121 (constitutive OxyS expression strain) are mapped onto the OxyS RNA. Upper panels show the size and nucleotide distribution of mapped reads. Lower panels show the frequency of mapped reads along the OxyS non-coding RNA. Colored bars indicate the genomic, mature and che-2 complementary sequences of the OxyS RNA.

Figure 4
figure 4

che-2 mRNA is not down-regulated upon OxyS RNA feeding.

Relative fold-change of che-2 mRNA in animals fed with either the constitutive OxyS expression strain (E. coli AZ121) or the ΔOxyS (E. coli GS035). Fold-change is calculated relative to the che-2 mRNA levels in animals fed with the wild type E. coli strain HB101.

Given the lack of engagement of the RNAi pathway, we speculated that the small RNAs mapping to the OxyS RNA might be generated by the bacteria and not by C. elegans. To test this we sequenced the small RNAs from the E.coli strains alone. In the AZ121 strain, we detected a very similar pattern of 21–22 nt small RNAs, mostly mapping to the 3′ end of the OxyS RNA and more abundant than the reads detected from the sequenced animals (Fig. 3, rightmost panels). Thus small RNAs arising from the OxyS RNA are made within the bacteria and are not generated by the C. elegans RNAi pathway. We believe that these small RNAs are likely degradation products of the OxyS RNA and do not enter the RNAi pathway. We also mapped all the small RNAs to the E. coli genome to make sure that the OxyS RNA is expressed (Fig. 5). In AZ121 strain, small RNA reads mapping to the OxyS RNA can be detected in abundance (Fig. 5, top panel red line). In contrast, GS035 strain has no reads mapping to the OxyS RNA.

Figure 5
figure 5

small RNA reads mapping to the E. coli genome.

Small RNA sequencing reads from animals fed with either E. coli AZ121 (upper panel) or E. coli GS035 (lower panel) are mapped to the E. coli genome in windows of 5,000 bases. Red bar in the upper panel highlights the reads mapping to the OxyS transcript. There were no reads mapping to the OxyS transcript in the ΔOxyS GS035 strain (lower panel).

Discussion

Here we show that small RNA sequencing can efficiently be used to elucidate possible regulatory roles of non-coding RNAs in C. elegans. Our analysis of the OxyS RNA as a trigger for RNAi in C. elegans clearly shows that OxyS non-coding RNA does not enter the canonical RNAi pathway in C. elegans upon feeding. We suggest that the previously described phenotypes in C. elegans upon OxyS non-coding RNA feeding17 are more likely to be caused by the differences within the bacterial strains. It is known that different bacteria can affect the physiology of the nematodes with respect to foraging, metabolism and ageing19,20. It remains possible that RNA produced by different bacteria in nature enters the C. elegans RNAi pathway; however, our results suggest that sequencing of the small RNA populations in C. elegans is essential to confirm this. We conclude that the biology of environmental RNAi remains to be discovered.

Methods

E. coli HB101, AZ121 and GS035 strains were grown in LB media containing no antibiotics, ampicillin (100 µg/ml) or chloramphenicol (25 µg/ml) respectively (OD595 = 0.6–0.8). Cultures were centrifuged and the re-suspended pellets were seeded onto NGM plates. For one generation feeding experiments, animals were placed on the seeded NGM plates and allowed to grow until young adult stage. For three generation feeding experiments, L1 larval stage animals were placed on the seeded NGM plates and allowed to grow for three generations. Total RNA from harvested animals was isolated using the TriSure reagent (Bioline). Small RNA sequencing libraries of C. elegans were prepared using the NEBNext Multiplex Small RNA Library Prep set (NEB) and the small RNA sequencing libraries of E. coli are prepared using the TruSeq Small RNA set (Illumina). Libraries were either sequenced on a MiSeq or a HiSeq 1500 machine (Illumina). Data analysis was performed as previously described21. Small RNA-seq data is available through NCBI-GEO with accession number GSE64990. qRT-PCR is performed with primers described in Liu et al17. OxyS RNA structure is determined using the Mfold web server22.