Abstract
Human mobility has been empirically observed to exhibit Lévy flightcharacteristics and behaviour with powerlaw distributed jump size. The fundamentalmechanisms behind this behaviour has not yet been fully explained. In thispaper, we propose to explain the Lévy walk behaviour observed in humanmobility patterns by decomposing them into different classes according tothe different transportation modes, such as Walk/Run, Bike, Train/Subway orCar/Taxi/Bus. Our analysis is based on two reallife GPS datasets containingapproximately 10 and 20 million GPS samples with transportation mode information.We show that human mobility can be modelled as a mixture of different transportationmodes and that these single movement patterns can be approximated by a lognormaldistribution rather than a powerlaw distribution. Then, we demonstrate thatthe mixture of the decomposed lognormal flight distributions associated witheach modality is a powerlaw distribution, providing an explanation to theemergence of Lévy Walk patterns that characterize human mobility patterns.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Understanding human mobility is crucial for epidemic control^{1,2,3,4},urban planning^{5,6}, traffic forecasting systems^{7,8}and, more recently, various mobile and network applications^{9,10,11,12,13}.Previous research has shown that trajectories in human mobility have statisticallysimilar features as Lévy Walks by studying the traces of bank notes^{14}, cell phone users' locations^{15} and GPS^{16,17,18,19}. According to the this model, human movement containsmany short flights and some long flights and these flights follow a powerlawdistribution.
Intuitively, these long flights and short flights reflect different transportationmodalities. Figure 1 shows a person's oneday tripwith three transportation modalities in Beijing based on the Geolife dataset(Table 1)^{20,21,22}. Starting fromthe bottom right corner of the figure, the person takes a taxi and then walksto the destination in the top left part. After two hours, the person takesthe subway to another location (bottom left) and spends five hours there.Then the journey continues and the person takes a taxi back to the originallocation (bottom right). The short flights are associated with walking andthe second shortdistance taxi trip, whereas the long flights are associatedwith the subway and the initial taxi trip. Based on this simple example, weobserve that the flight distribution of each transportation mode is different.
In this paper, we study human mobility with two large GPS datasets, theGeolife and Nokia MDC datasets (approximately 20 million and 10 million GPSsamples respectively), both containing transportation mode information suchas Walk/Run, Bike, Train/Subway or Car/Taxi/Bus. The four transportation modes(Walk/Run, Bike, Train/Subway and Car/Taxi/Bus) cover the most frequentlyused human mobility cases. First, we simplify the trajectories obtained fromthe datasets using a rectangular model, from which we obtain the flight length^{16}. Here a flight is the longest straightline trip from one pointto another without change of direction^{16,19}. One trail froman origin to a destination may include several different flights (Fig.1). Then, we determine the flight length distributions for differenttransportation modes. We fit the flight distribution of each transportationmode according to the Akaike information criteria^{23} in orderto find the best fit distribution.
We show that human movement exhibiting different transportation modalitiesis better fitted with the lognormal distribution rather than the powerlawdistribution. Finally, we demonstrate that the mixture of these transportationmode distributions is a powerlaw distribution based on two new findings:first, there is a significant positive correlation between consecutive flightsin the same transportation mode and second, the elapsed time in each transportationmode is exponentially distributed.
The contribution of this paper is twofold. First, we extract the distributionfunction of displacement with different transportation modes. This is importantfor many applications^{7,8,9,10,11}. For example, a populationweightedopportunities (PWO) model^{24} has been developed to predict humanmobility patterns in cities. They find that there is a relatively high mobilityat the city scale due to highly developed traffic systems inside cities. Ourresults significantly deepen the understanding of urban human mobilities withdifferent transportation modes. Second, we demonstrate that the mixture ofdifferent transportations can be approximated as a truncated Lévy Walk.This result is a step towards explaining the emergence of Lévy Walkpatterns in human mobility.
Results
Powerlaw fit for overall flight
First, we fit the flight length distribution of the Geolife and Nokia MDCdatasets regardless of transportation modes (see Methods section). We fittruncated powerlaw, lognormal, powerlaw and exponential distribution (see Supplementary Table S1). We find that the overall flight length(l) distributions fit a truncated powerlaw P(l) ∝ l^{α}e^{γl}with exponent α as 1.57 in the Geolife dataset (γ =0.00025) and 1.39 in the Nokia MDC dataset (γ = 0.00016) (Fig. 2), better than other alternatives such as powerlaw,lognormal or exponential. Figure 2 illustrates the PDFsand their best fitted distributions according to Akaike weights. The bestfitted distribution (truncated powerlaw) is represented as a solid line andthe rest are dotted lines. We use logarithm bins to remove tail noises^{16,25}. Our result is consistent with previous research (Refs. 14–19) and the exponent α is close totheir results.
We show the Akaike weights for all fitted distributions in the SupplementaryTable S2. The Akaike weight is a value between 0 and 1. The larger itis, the better the distribution is fitted^{23,25}. The Akaikeweights of the powerlaw distributions regardless of transportation modesare 1.0000 in both datasets. The pvalue is less than 0.01 in all our tests,which means that our results are very strong in terms of statistical significance.Note that here the differences between fitted distributions are not remarkableas shown in the Fig. 2, especially between the truncatedpowerlaw and the lognormal distribution. We use the loglikelihood ratio tofurther compare these two candidate distributions. The loglikelihood ratiois positive if the data is more likely in the powerlaw distribution, andnegative if the data is more likely in the lognormal distribution. The loglikelihoodratio is 1279.98 and 3279.82 (with the significance value p < 0.01)in the Geolife and the NokiaMDC datasets respectively, indicating that thedata is much better fitted with the truncated powerlaw distribution.
Lognormal fit for single transportation mode
However, the distribution of flight lengths in each single transportationmode is not well fitted with the powerlaw distribution. Instead, they arebetter fitted with the lognormal distribution (see SupplementaryTable S2). All the segments of each transportation flight length arebest approximated by the lognormal distribution with different parameters.In Fig. 3 and Supplementary Fig. S1,we represent the flight length distributions of Walk/Run, Bike, Subway/Trainand Car/Taxi/Bus in the Geolife and the Nokia MDC dataset correspondingly.The best fitted distribution (lognormal) is represented as a solid line andthe rest are dotted lines.
Table 2 shows the fitted parameter for all thedistributions (α in the truncated powerlaw, μ and σin the lognormal). We can easily find that the μ is increasingover these transportation modes (Walk/Run, Bike, Car/Taxi/Bus and Subway/Train),identifying an increasing average distance. Compared to Walk/Run, Bike orCar/Taxi/Bus, the flight distribution in Subway/Train mode is more rightskewed,which means that people usually travel to a more distant location by Subway/Train.
It must be noted that our findings for the Car/Taxi/Bus mode are differentfrom these recent research results^{26,27}, which also investigatedthe case of a single transportation mode and found that the scaling of humanmobility is exponential by examining taxi GPS datasets. The differences aremainly because few people tend to travel a long distance by taxi due to economicconsiderations. So the displacements in their results decay faster than thosemeasured in our Car/Taxi/Bus mode cases.
Mechanisms behind the powerlaw pattern
We characterize the mechanism of the powerlaw pattern with Lévyflights by mixing the lognormal distributions of the transportation modes.Previous research has shown that a mixture of lognormal distributions basedon an exponential distribution is a powerlaw distribution^{30,31,32,33}.Based on their findings, we demonstrate that the reason that human movementfollows the Lévy Walk pattern is due to the mixture of the transportationmodes they take.
We demonstrate that the mixture of the lognormal distributions of differenttransportation modes (Walk/Run, Bike, Train/Subway or Car/Taxi/Bus) is a powerlawdistribution given two new findings: first, we define the change rate as therelative change of length between two consecutive flights with the same transportmode. The change rate in the same transportation mode is small over time.Second, the elapsed time between different transportation modes is exponentiallydistributed.
Lognormal in the same transportation mode
Let us consider a generic flight l_{t}. The flight lengthat next interval of time l_{t}_{+1}, given the changerate c_{t}_{+1}, is
It has been found that the change rate c_{t} in the sametransportation mode is small over time^{9,22}. The change rate c_{t}reflects the correlation between two consecutive displacements in one trip.To obtain the pattern of correlation between consecutive displacements ineach transportation mode, we plot the flight length point (l_{t}, l_{t}_{+1})from the GeoLife dataset (Fig. 4). Here l_{t}represents the tth flight length and l_{t}_{+1}represents the t + 1th flight length in a consecutive trajectory inone transportation mode^{34}. Figure 4 showsthe density of flight lengths correlation in Car/Taxi/Bus, Walk/Run, Subway/Trainand Bike correspondingly. (l_{t}, l_{t}_{+1})are posited near the diagonal line, which identifies a clear positive correlation.Similar results are also found in the Nokia MDC dataset (see SupplementaryFig. S2).
We use the Pearson correlation coefficient to quantify the strength ofthe correlation between two consecutive flights in one transportation mode^{35}. The value of Pearson correlation coefficient r is shownin the Supplementary Table S3. The p value is lessthan 0.01 in all the cases, identifying very strong statistical significances. ris positive in each transportation mode and ranges from 0.3640 to 0.6445,which means that there is a significant positive correlation between consecutiveflights in the same transportation mode and the change rate c_{t}in the same transportation mode between two time steps is small.
The difference c_{t} in the same transportation mode betweentwo time steps is small due to a small difference l_{t}_{+1} − l_{t}in consecutive flights. We sum all the contributions as follows:
We plot the change rate samples c_{t} of the Car/Taxi/Busmode from the Geolife dataset as an example in SupplementaryFig. S3. We observe that the change rate c_{t} fluctuatesin an uncorrelated fashion from one time interval to the other in one transportationmode due to the unpredictable character of the change rate. The Pearson correlationcoefficient accepts the findings at the 0.03–0.13 level with pvalueless than 0.05 (see Supplementary Table S4). By the CentralLimit Theorem, the sum of the change rate c_{t} is normallydistributed with the mean μT and the variance σ^{2}T,where μ and σ^{2} are the mean and varianceof the change rate c_{t} and T is the elapsed time.Then we can assert that for every time step t, the logarithm of lis also normally distributed with a mean μt and variance σ^{2}t ^{36}. Note here that l_{T} is the length of the flightat the time T after T intervals of elapsed time. In the sametransportation mode, the distribution of the flight length with the same changerate mean is lognormal, its density is given by
whichcorresponds to our findings that in each single transportation mode the flightlength is lognormal distributed.
Transportation mode elapsed time
We define elapsed time as the time spent in a particular transportationmode; we found that it is exponentially distributed. For example, the trajectorysamples shown in Fig. 1 contain six trajectories withthree different transportation modes, (taxi, walk, subway, walk, taxi, walk).Thus the elapsed time also consists of six samples (t_{taxi}_{1}, t_{walk}_{1}, t_{subway}_{1}, t_{walk}_{2}, t_{taxi}_{2}, t_{walk}_{3}).The elapsed time t is weighted exponentially between the differenttransportation modes (see Supplementary Fig. S4). Similarresults are also reported in Refs. 26, 37. The exponentially weighted time interval is mainlydue to a large portion of Walk/Run flight intervals. Walk/Run is usually aconnecting mode between different transportation modes (e.g., the trajectorysamples shown in Fig. 1) and Walk/Run usually takesmuch shorter time than any other modes. Thus the elapsed time decays exponentially.For example, 87.93% of the walk flight distance connecting other transportationmodes is within 500 meters and the travelling time is within 5 minutes inthe Geolife dataset.
Mixture of the transportation modes
Given these lognormal distributions P_{singlemode}(l)in each transportation mode and the exponential elapsed time t betweendifferent modes, we make use of mixtures of distributions. We obtain the overallhuman mobility probability by considering that the distribution of flightlength is determined by the time t, the transportation mode changerate c_{t} mean μ and variance σ^{2}.We obtain the distribution of single transportation mode distribution withthe time t, the change rate mean μ and variance σ^{2}fixed. We then compute the mixture over the distribution of t since tis exponentially distributed over different transportation modes with an exponentialparameter λ. If the distribution of l, p(l, t),depends on the parameter t. t is also distributed accordingto its own distribution r(t). Then the distribution of l, p(l)is given by . Here the t in p(l, t)is the same as the t in the r(t). r(t)is the exponential distribution of elapsed time t with an exponentialparameter λ.
So the mixture (overall flight length P_{overall}(l))of these lognormal distributions in one transportation mode given an exponentialelapsed time (with an exponent λ) between each transportation modeis
which can be calculated to give
where the power law exponent α′ is determined by ^{31,32,33}. The calculation to obtain α′is given in Supplementary Note 1. If we substitute theparameters presented in Table 2, we will get the α′= 1.55 in the Geolife dataset, which is close to the original parameter α= 1.57 and α′ = 1.40 in the Nokia MDC dataset, which isclose to the original parameter α = 1.39. The result verifies thatthe mixture of these correlated lognormal distributed flights in one transportationmode given an exponential elapsed time between different modes is a truncatedpowerlaw distribution.
Discussion
Previous research suggests that it might be the underlying road networkthat governs the Lévy flight human mobility, by exploring the humanmobility and examining taxi traces in one city in Sweden^{19}.To verify their hypothesis, we use a road network dataset of Beijing containing433,391 roads with 171,504 conjunctions and plot the road length distribution^{16,28,29}. As shown in Supplementary Fig. S5,the road length distribution is very different to our powerlaw fit in flightsdistribution regardless of transportation modes. The α in roadlength distribution is 3.4, much larger than our previous findings α= 1.57 in the Geolife and α = 1.39 in the Nokia MDC. Thus the underlyingstreet network cannot fully explain the Lévy flight in human mobility.This is mainly due to the fact that it does not consider many long flightscaused by metro or train and people do not always turn even if they arriveat a conjunction of a road. Thus the flight length tails in the human mobilityshould be much larger than those in the road networks.
Methods
Data Sets
We use two large reallife GPS trajectory datasets in our work, the Geolifedataset^{20} and the Nokia MDC dataset^{38}. The keyinformation provided by these two datasets is summarized in Table1. We extract the following information from the dataset: flight lengthsand their corresponding transportation modes.
Geolife^{20,21,22} is a public dataset with 182 users'GPS trajectory over five years (from April 2007 to August 2012) gathered mainlyin Beijing, China. This dataset contains over 24 million GPS samples witha total distance of 1,292,951 kilometers and a total of 50,176 hours.It includes not only daily life routines such as going to work and back homein Beijing, but also some leisure and sports activities, such as sightseeing,and walking in other cities. The transportation mode information in this datasetis manually logged by the participants.
The Nokia MDC dataset^{38} is a public dataset from Nokia ResearchSwitzerland that aims to study smartphone user behaviour. The dataset containsextensive smartphone data of two hundred volunteers in the Lake Geneva regionover one and a half years (from September 2009 to April 2011). This datasetcontains 11 million data points and the corresponding transportation modes.
Obtaining Transportation Mode and The Corresponding Flight Length
We categorize human mobility into four different kinds of transportationmodality: Walk/Run, Car/Bus/Taxi, Subway/Train and Bike. The four transportationmodes cover the most frequently used human mobility cases. To the best ofour knowledge, this article is the first work that examines the flight distributionwith all kinds of transportation modes in both urban and intercity environments.In the Geolife dataset, users have labelled their trajectories with transportationmodes, such as driving, taking a bus or a train, riding a bike and walking.There is a label file storing the transportation mode labels in each user'sfolder, from which we can obtain the ground truth transportation mode eachuser is taking and the corresponding timestamps. Similar to the Geolife dataset,there is also a file storing the transportation mode with an activity ID inthe Nokia MDC dataset. We treat the transportation mode information in thesetwo datasets as the ground truth.
In order to obtain the flight distribution in each transportation mode,we need to extract the flights. We define a flight as the longest straightlinetrip from one point to another without change of direction^{16,19}.One trail from an original to a destination may include several differentflights (Fig. 1). In order to mitigate GPS errors, werecompute a position by averaging samples (latitude, longitude) every minute.Since people do not necessarily move in perfect straight lines, we need toallow some margin of error in defining the ‘straight’ line. Weuse a rectangular model to simplify the trajectory and obtain the flight length:when we draw a straight line between the first point and the last point, thesampled positions between these two endpoints are at a distance less than10 meters from the line. The same trajectory simplification mechanism hasbeen used in other articles which investigates the Lévy walk natureof human mobility^{16}. We map the flight length with transportationmodes according to timestamp in the Geolife dataset and activity ID in theNokia MDC dataset and obtain the final (transportation mode, flight length)patterns. We obtain 202,702 and 224,723 flights with transportation mode knowledgein the Geolife and Nokia MDC dataset, respectively.
Identifying the Scale Range
To fit a heavy tailed distribution such as a powerlaw distribution, weneed to determine what portion of the data to fit (x_{min})and the scaling parameter (α). We use the methods from Refs. 30, 39 to determine x_{min}and α. We create a powerlaw fit starting from each value in thedataset. Then we select the one that results in the minimal KolmogorovSmirnovdistance, between the data and the fit, as the optimal value of x_{min}.After that, the scaling parameter α in the powerlaw distributionis given by
where x_{i}are the observed values of x_{i} > x_{min}and n is number of samples.
Akaike weights
We use Akaike weights to choose the best fitted distribution. An Akaikeweight is a normalized distribution selection criterion^{23}.Its value is between 0 and 1. The larger the value is, the better the distributionis fitted.
Akaike's information criterion (AIC) is used in combination with Maximumlikelihood estimation (MLE). MLE finds an estimator of that maximizes the likelihood function of one distribution. AIC is used to describe the bestfitting one among all fitted distributions,
HereK is the number of estimable parameters in the approximating model.
After determining the AIC value of each fitted distribution, we normalizethese values as follows. First of all, we extract the difference between differentAIC values called Δ_{i},
Then Akaike weights W_{i} are calculated as follows,
References
Ni, S. & Weng, W. Impact of travel patterns on epidemic dynamics in heterogeneous spatial metapopulation networks. Physical Review E 79, 016111 (2009).
Balcan, D. & Vespignani, A. Phase transitions in contagion processes mediated by recurrent mobility patterns. Nat Phys 7, 7 (2011).
Belik, V., Geisel, T. & Brockmann, D. Natural human mobility patterns and spatial spread of infectious diseases. Phys. Rev. X 1, 011001 (2011).
Colizza, V., Barrat, A., Barthelemy, M., Valleron, A.J. & Vespignani, A. Modeling the worldwide spread of pandemic influenza: baseline case and containment interventions. PLoS Med 4, e13 (2007).
Zheng, Y., Liu, Y., Yuan, J. & Xie, X. Urban computing with taxicabs. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp), Beijing, China. ACM. (2011 September).
Yuan, J., Zheng, Y. & Xie, X. Discovering regions of different functions in a city using human mobility and pois. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), San Diego, USA. ACM. (2012 August).
Jung, W.S., Wang, F. & Stanley, H. E. Gravity model in the korean highway. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 81, 48005 (2008).
Goh, S., Lee, K., Park, J. S. & Choi, M. Y. Modification of the gravity model and application to the metropolitan seoul subway system. Phys. Rev. E 86, 026102 (2012).
Hemminki, S., Nurmi, P. & Tarkoma, S. Accelerometerbased transportation mode detection on smartphones. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems (SenSys), Roma, Italy. ACM. (2013 November).
Zheng, Y., Chen, Y., Li, Q., Xie, X. & Ma, W.Y. Understanding transportation modes based on gps data for web applications. TWEB 4 (2010).
Zheng, Y., Liu, L., Wang, L. & Xie, X. Learning transportation mode from raw gps data for geographic applications on the web. In: Proceedings of the 17th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), Beijing, China. ACM. (2008 April).
Hui, P., Lindgren, A. & Crowcroft, J. Empirical evaluation of hybrid opportunistic networks. In: Proceedings of The 1st International Conference on COMunication Systems and NETworks(COMSNETS), Bangalore, India. IEEE. (2009 January).
Rao, W., Zhao, K., Hui, P., Zhang, Y. & Tarkoma, S. Towards maximizing timely content delivery in delay tolerant networks. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing 99, 1 (2014).
Brockmann, D., Hufnagel, L. & Geisel, T. The scaling laws of human travel. Nature 439, 462–465 (2006).
Gonzalez, M. C., Hidalgo, C. A. & Barabasi, A.L. Understanding individual human mobility patterns. Nature 453, 779–782 (2008).
Rhee, I. et al. On the levywalk nature of human mobility. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 19, 630–643 (2011).
Yan, X., Han, X., Wang, B. & Zhou, T. Diversity of individual mobility patterns and emergence of aggregated scaling laws. Sci. Rep. 3, 2678; 10.1038/srep02678 (2013).
Han, X.P., Hao, Q., Wang, B.H. & Zhou, T. Origin of the scaling law in human mobility: hierarchy of traffic systems. Phys. Rev. E 83, 036117 (2011).
Jiang, B., Yin, J. & Zhao, S. Characterizing the human mobility pattern in a large street network. Phys. Rev. E 80, 021136 (2009).
Zheng, Y., Xie, X. & Ma, W.Y. Geolife: a collaborative social networking service among user, location and trajectory. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 33, 32–39 (2010).
Zheng, Y., Zhang, L., Xie, X. & Ma, W.Y. Mining interesting locations and travel sequences from gps trajectories. In: Proceedings of the 18th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW), Madrid, Spain. ACM. (2009 April).
Zheng, Y., Li, Q., Chen, Y., Xie, X. & Ma, W.Y. Understanding mobility based on gps data. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp), Orlando, USA. ACM. (2008 September).
Burnham, K. & Anderson, D. Model Selection and MultiModel Inference: A Practical InformationTheoretic Approach. (Springer, 2010).
Yan, XY., Zhao, C., Fan, Y., Di, Z. & Wang, W.X. Universal predictability of mobility patterns in cities. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140834; 10.1098/rsif.2014.0834 (2014).
Alstott, J., Bullmore, E. & Plenz, D. Powerlaw: a python package for analysis of heavytailed distributions. PLoS ONE 9, e85777; 10.1371/journal.pone.0085777 (2014).
Liang, X., Zhao, J., Dong, L. & Xu, K. Unraveling the origin of exponential law in intraurban human mobility. Sci. Rep. 3, 2983; 10.1038/srep02983 (2013).
Liang, X., Zheng, X., Lv, W., Zhu, T. & Xu, K. The scaling of human mobility by taxis is exponential. Physica A 391, 2135–2144 (2012).
Yuan, N. J. & Zheng, Y. Segmentation of urban areas using road networks. Technical Report (2012). Available at: http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/168518/mapsegmentation.pdf. (Accessed: 22nd January 2015).
Song, R., Sun, W., Zheng, B. & Zheng, Y. Press: A novel framework of trajectory compression in road networks. In: Proceedings of The 40th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases (VLDB), Hangzhou, China. IEEE. (2014 September).
Newman, M. E. J. Power laws, pareto distributions and zipf's law. Contemporary Physics 46, 323 (2005).
Huberman, B. A. & Adamic, L. A. The nature of markets in the world wide web. Quarterly Journal of Economic Commerce. 10.2139/ssrn.166108 (2000).
Huberman, B. A. & Adamic, L. A. Evolutionary dynamics of the world wide web. arXiv:condmat/9901071 (1999).
Mitzenmacher, M. A brief history of generative models for power law and lognormal distributions. Internet Mathematics 1, 226–251 (2004).
Wang, X.W., Han, X.P. & Wang, B.H. Correlations and scaling laws in human mobility. PLoS ONE 9, e84954; 10.1371/journal.pone.0084954 (2014).
Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd edn (Routledge, 1988).
Ross, S. M. Stochastic Processes. 2nd edn (Wiley, New York, 1995).
Zhu, H. et al. Recognizing exponential intercontact time in vanets. In: Proceedings of The 29th IEEE Conference on Computer Communications (INFOCOM), Berlin, Germany. IEEE. (2010 March).
Kiukkonen, N., Blom, J., Dousse, O., GaticaPerez, D. & Laurila, J. Towards rich mobile phone datasets: Lausanne data collection campaign. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Pervasive Services (ICPS), Berlin, Germany. ACM. (2010 July).
Clauset, A., Shalizi, C. & Newman, M. Powerlaw distributions in empirical data. SIAM Review 51, 661–703 (2009).
Acknowledgements
The research at the University of Helsinki was supported by the DIGILEInternet of Things research program, ESENS project funded by Tekes and EITICT Labs. Mirco Musolesi would like to acknowledge the support of EPSRC throughthe grants “Trajectories of Depression” (P/L006340/1) and “TheUncertainty of Identity: Linking Spatiotemporal Information Between Virtualand Real Worlds” (EP/J005266/1). Weixiong Rao's work is partiallysupported by Shanghai Science and Technology Commission (15ZR1443000) andIBM Faculty award 2014. We thank Petteri Nurmi for discussions and feedbackon the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.Z., M.M., P.H., W.R. and S.T. designed the research based on the initialidea by K.Z. and S.T. K.Z. executed the experiments guided by M.M., P.H.,W.R. and S.T. K.Z. and S.T. performed statistical analyses and prepared thefigures. K.Z., M.M., P.H., W.R. and S.T. wrote the manuscript. All authorsreviewed the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensedunder a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The imagesor other third party material in this article are included in the article'sCreative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; ifthe material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users willneed to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce thematerial. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Zhao, K., Musolesi, M., Hui, P. et al. Explaining the powerlaw distribution of human mobility through transportationmodality decomposition. Sci Rep 5, 9136 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09136
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09136
This article is cited by

Potential fields and fluctuationdissipation relations derived from human flow in urban areas modeled by a network of electric circuits
Scientific Reports (2022)

The Influence of Activities and SocioEconomic/Demographic Factors on the Acceptable Distance in an Indian Scenario
Transportation in Developing Economies (2021)

Simulations of Lévy Walk
Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series B (2021)

Universal scaling laws of collective human flow patterns in urban regions
Scientific Reports (2020)

Partial Correlation between Spatial and Temporal Regularities of Human Mobility
Scientific Reports (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.