Contemporary Jews retain a genetic imprint from their Near Eastern ancestry, but obtained substantial genetic components from their neighboring populations during their history. Whether they received any genetic contribution from the Far East remains unknown, but frequent communication with the Chinese has been observed since the Silk Road period. To address this issue, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation from 55,595 Eurasians are analyzed. The existence of some eastern Eurasian haplotypes in eastern Ashkenazi Jews supports an East Asian genetic contribution, likely from Chinese. Further evidence indicates that this connection can be attributed to a gene flow event that occurred less than 1.4 kilo-years ago (kya), which falls within the time frame of the Silk Road scenario and fits well with historical records and archaeological discoveries. This observed genetic contribution from Chinese to Ashkenazi Jews demonstrates that the historical exchange between Ashkenazim and the Far East was not confined to the cultural sphere but also extended to an exchange of genes.
Consistent with their displaced ethno-history since the ancient Northern Kingdom of Israel was invaded and occupied by the Neo-Assyrian Empire1, contemporary Jews, including Ashkenazi Jews, Sephardic Jews, North African Jews and Middle Eastern Jews2, retain a genetic imprint of their Near Eastern ancestry, but have received a substantial contribution, to a variable extent, from their neighboring populations such as Europeans, Near Easterners and North Africans2,3,4,5,6,7,8. However, it has hitherto remained unclear whether Jews received any genetic contribution from populations outside western Eurasia. Intriguingly, frequent communication has been observed between Jews and Chinese since the early centuries of the Common Era, plausibly initiated by the Silk Road. For instance, Hebrew letters and prayers in the 8th century from ancient Jewish merchants were found in the northwestern region of China9. Some unearthed pottery figurines from the Tang Dynasty (618–907AD) have Semitic characteristics9 and synagogues were recorded in the epigraphy from the Ming (1368–1644AD) and Qing Dynasties (1644–1912AD)9,10. Nonetheless, such connections, as revealed by the archaeological discoveries and historical records, have been confined to economic and cultural exchanges; so far, no direct evidence of a genetic contribution from Chinese into Jews has been reported.
To address the issue of whether Jews received any genetic contribution from the Far East and thus shed more light on their ethno-origins, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variation (mainly from the control region of the molecule, plus some coding-region variants) of 1,930 Jews and 21,191 East Asians, retrieved from previous studies as well as our unpublished data, were considered and analyzed, with especial attention to pinpointing eastern Eurasian haplogroups in Jews (Supplementary Table S1). Then, mtDNA control region variants of an additional 32,474 Eurasian individuals were analyzed to gain further insights into the phylogeographic distribution of M33c (Supplementary Table S1), so that the total number of Eurasian mtDNAs considered here was 55,595. Our results do reveal a direct genetic connection, as manifested by the sharing of some Eastern Eurasian haplogroups e.g. N9a, A and M33c, between Jews and Chinese. Further analyses, including phylogeny reconstruction with the aid of new mtDNA genomes, confirm that this connection was established at least by a founder lineage M33c2. The differentiation time of this lineage is estimated to ~1.4 kilo-years ago (kya), which fits well with the historical records and, most importantly, indicates that the exchange between Jews and the Far East was not confined to culture but also extended to the demic.
Results and Discussion
Our analysis of the mtDNA variation in a total of 23,121 individuals from East Asian populations and Jews reveals that mtDNAs of four Ashkenazi Jewish individuals can be allocated into eastern Eurasian haplogroups A and N9a, suggesting that Ashkenazi Jews received a genetic contribution from East Asia (Table 1). Intriguingly, our results also disclose that 14 eastern Ashkenazi Jews belong to haplogroup M33c (Table 1), for which sister clusters, M33a, M33b and M33d, are prevalent in the Indian Subcontinent and thus most plausibly trace their origins there11,12.
To achieve further insight into the phylogeographic distribution of M33c, mtDNA variants (mainly from the control region) of an additional 32,474 Eurasian individuals were analyzed, so that the total number of Eurasian mtDNAs considered here was 55,595. As shown in Table 1, besides the 14 Ashkenazi Jewish M33c lineages, an additional 38 M33c mtDNAs (with the specific control-region motif showing transitions at positions 16111, 16223, 16235 and 16362) were pinpointed, among which 34 are from China, 2 from Vietnam and 1 from Thailand, with the remaining individual most likely from Europe but with ambiguous ancestry. Thus, despite the restricted distribution of M33a, M33b and M33d in South Asia, it is most likely that M33c originated, or at least differentiated, in eastern Asia. This notion receives clear support from the median network, in which virtually all of the diversity of this haplogroup is observed in China (Figure 1).
To shed light on the phylogeny within haplogroup M33c, 11 mtDNAs, covering the widest range of internal variation within the haplogroup, were chosen for whole-mtDNA genome sequencing. In good agreement with the previous result13, the resulting phylogenetic tree (Figure 2), incorporating five previously reported mtDNA genomes13,14,15 as well as one whose information was released online (A Genetic Genealogy Community; http://eng.molgen.org), confirms that M33c is defined by mutations at positions 3316, 4079, 5894, 8227, 8848, 16111 and 16235. Of note is that five clades within M33c appear respectively characterized by diagnostic coding-region variant(s) and these are named M33c1 to M33c5 here. With the exception of M33c2, all the samples in these clades are from China. The likely origin of M33 in South Asia and the restriction to China of M33c, dating to 10 kya according to the estimation based on whole-mtDNA genome, implies some dispersal from South to East Asia in the immediate postglacial.
Intriguingly, sub-haplogroup M33c2 (defined by three additional coding-region variants at positions 4182, 4577 and 7364) consists of three different haplotypes (one seen in three Ashkenazi Jews, another in a single Chinese individual and the third in the likely European with unknown ethnicity). Although there is no control-region variant in the defining motif of M33c2, multiple lines of evidence suggest that the pinpointed 14 Ashkenazi Jewish M33c mtDNAs most likely all belong to this clade: (1) all of the 14 mtDNAs share an identical control-region motif (Table 1); (2) the three completely sequenced Ashkenazi Jewish mtDNAs with this motif (EU148486, Bel 1 and Forum 1) belong to M33c2 (Figure 2); (3) M33c shows a virtually exclusive distribution in Ashkenazi Jews in western Eurasia, even though 55,595 mtDNAs have been checked (Table 1 and Supplementary Table S1). Thus, it is plausible that the unknown European individual (JQ702003) was in fact from a Jewish population or had Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry.
Age estimates for M33c2 are similar whether based either on the whole genome or on the control region alone (Table 2) and the age of ~1.4 kya fits well with the medieval operation of the Silk Road. We note that this is an upper bound for the gene flow event during which the lineage was assimilated into the Ashkenazim; it is the age of the subclade overall, which most likely arose within China and indeed there is no variation at all within the Jewish lineages, suggesting a very recent event. If we assume that the unidentified European lineage belongs within the Ashkenazi diversity, we can date the Ashkenazi subclade itself more specifically to about 640 years ago – around 1350AD. This in turn would then provide a minimum point estimate for the age of the gene flow event (although the range taking account of errors in the estimates is of course much wider).
The ancient Silk Road was an important transportation hub connecting China and the Mediterranean region from the Han Dynasty (206BC–220AD) onwards and there are likely to have been Jewish merchants at the eastern end of the Silk Road from the early centuries AD. Moreover, Jewish merchants in Europe, referred to as Radhanites, were involved in trade between west and east as early as the ninth century16. It has been suggested, on the basis of contrasts between patterns of mtDNA and Y-chromosome variation17, that such merchants may have formed the nucleus for a number of extant Jewish communities.
Ashkenazi origins are controversial18. According to recent archaeological evidence, the Jewish community of Cologne, mentioned by Emperor Constantine in 321AD, existed in the city continuously until they had to leave in 1423–1424AD19. This suggests that Ashkenazi Jewry may date to Roman times, possibly originating in Italy, which is also suggested by analysis of mtDNA8 and autosomal data20. An early eastern European Ashkenazi origin from Italy (first millennium and earlier) would also agree with the finding that an origin mainly from Germany21 or another central or western European country18 during the late Middle Ages, is demographically not possible. Recent work also suggests a sizable Jewish presence in eastern Germany (the Danube region, rather than the Rhineland) prior to the expansion in Poland between 1500 and 1650AD22. The M33c2 mtDNAs are confined to eastern European Ashkenazim in the present database (the single unknown example is of likely East European ancestry14), suggesting that these groups had contacts to the east to the extent that they mediated female gene flow.
Extensive genetic admixture has been observed in populations residing around the ancient Silk Road region23,24. Our currently observed genetic imprint echoes the previously observed ancient communications between Jews and Chinese and, most significantly, implies that such historical exchanges were not confined to the cultural realm but involved gene flow. This unexpected ancient genetic connection between Ashkenazi Jews and the Far East, as witnessed at least by mtDNA haplogroup M33c2, provides the first evidence for a significant genetic contribution from Chinese to eastern European Ashkenazi Jews that was most likely mediated by the Silk Road between around 640 and 1400 years ago. Although the involvement of male Jewish traders has been suggested before17, our results, focusing on the female line of descent, specifically point to the involvement also of women. Well-resolved evidence from the male-specific part of the Y chromosome and from the autosomes would help to further illustrate the rather complex, pan-Eurasian ethno-history of Jews.
mtDNA Data collection and mining
mtDNA variation (mainly from control region) of 23,121 East Asians and Jews, retrieved from previous studies as well as our unpublished data, were considered and analyzed, with especial attention to pinpointing the eastern Eurasian haplogroups in Jews. Then, additional 32,474 individuals were analyzed to gain further insights into the phylogeographic distribution of M33c, leading the total number of Eurasian mtDNAs considered here to 55,595. The study project was approved by the Ethics Committee at Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Each participant was informed about the study and provided informed consent. All mtDNAs collected and considered in the present study were first allocated to haplogroups, based mainly on their control-region motifs, which were then further confirmed by typing specific coding-region variation according to the PhyloTree (mtDNA tree Build 1625; http://www.phylotree.org/).
DNA amplification and sequencing
For haplogroups of interest, special attention was paid to the intrinsic phylogeny reconstructed on entire mitogenome information. In this way, entire mitogenomes for 11 selected representatives from haplogroup M33c were amplified, sequenced and dealt with as described elsewhere13,26. The sequencing outputs were edited and aligned by Lasergene (DNAStar Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, USA) and compared with the revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (rCRS)27.
The median-joining network of M33c was constructed manually28 and then confirmed using Network 4.612 (http://www.fluxus-engineering.com/sharenet.htm). The most parsimonious phylogenetic tree (Figure 2) was reconstructed by hand as carried out previously13,26. The coalescence ages were estimated by the ρ ± σ method29,30 and maximum likelihood (ML) analysis. Recently corrected calibrated mutation rates31 were adopted in the ρ statistic and the ML analysis.
Josephus, F. The Antiquities of the Jews (Echo Library, 2006).
Ostrer, H. A genetic profile of contemporary Jewish populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2, 891–898 (2001).
Behar, D. M. et al. The genome-wide structure of the Jewish people. Nature 466, 238–242 (2010).
Atzmon, G. et al. Abraham's children in the genome era: major Jewish diaspora populations comprise distinct genetic clusters with shared Middle Eastern Ancestry. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 86, 850–859 (2010).
Kopelman, N. et al. Genomic microsatellites identify shared Jewish ancestry intermediate between Middle Eastern and European populations. BMC Genet. 10, 80 (2009).
Need, A. C., Kasperavičiūtė, D., Cirulli, E. T. & Goldstein, D. B. A genome-wide genetic signature of Jewish ancestry perfectly separates individuals with and without full Jewish ancestry in a large random sample of European Americans. Genome Biol. 10, R7 (2009).
Behar, D. M. et al. The matrilineal ancestry of Ashkenazi Jewry: portrait of a recent founder event. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 78, 487–497 (2006).
Costa, M. D. et al. A substantial prehistoric European ancestry amongst Ashkenazi maternal lineages. Nat. Commun. 4, 2543 (2013).
Pan, G. The Jews in China (China Intercontinental Press, 2007).
Shapiro, S. Jews in old China: Studies by Chinese Scholars (Hippocrene Books, 2001).
Sun, C. et al. The dazzling array of basal branches in the mtDNA macrohaplogroup M from India as inferred from complete genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 23, 683–690 (2006).
Chandrasekar, A. et al. Updating phylogeny of mitochondrial DNA macrohaplogroup m in India: dispersal of modern human in South Asian corridor. PLoS ONE 4, e7447 (2009).
Kong, Q. P. et al. Large-scale mtDNA screening reveals a surprising matrilineal complexity in East Asia and its implications to the peopling of the region. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 513–522 (2011).
Behar, D. M. et al. A “Copernican” reassessment of the human mitochondrial DNA tree from its root. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 90, 675–684 (2012).
Zheng, H. X. et al. Major population expansion of East Asians began before Neolithic Time: Evidence of mtDNA genomes. PLoS ONE 6, e25835 (2011).
McCormick, M. Origins of the European Economy: Communications and Commerce AD 300–900 688–693 (Cambridge University Press, 2002).
Goldstein, D. B. Jacob's Legacy: A Genetic View of Jewish History. (Yale University Press, 2008).
van Straten, J. The Origin of Ashkenazi Jewry: The Controversy Unraveled. (New York: Walter de Gruyter & Co, 2011).
Schütte, S. & Gechter, M. Köln: archäologische zone Jüdisches Museum: von der Ausgrabung zum Museum-Kölner Archäologie zwischen Rathaus und Praetorium: Ergebnisse und Materialien 2006–2011. (Jüdisches Museum, 2011).
Behar, D. M. et al. No evidence fom genome-wide data of a Khazar origin for the Ashekanzi Jews. (Hum. Biol., in press) (2013).
van Straten, J. Early modern Polish Jewry: The Rhineland hypothesis revisited. Hist. Method. 40, 39–50 (2007).
King, R. D. Migration and linguistics as illustrated by Yiddish. In Reconstructing languages and cultures, Polomé P. C., & Winter W., eds. ed. 419–439 (Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1992).
Comas, D. et al. Trading genes along the silk road: mtDNA sequences and the origin of central Asian populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63, 1824–1838 (1998).
Yao, Y. G., Kong, Q. P., Wang, C. Y., Zhu, C. L. & Zhang, Y. P. Different matrilineal contributions to genetic structure of ethnic groups in the Silk Road region in China. Mol. Biol. Evol. 21, 2265–2280 (2004).
van Oven, M. & Kayser, M. Updated comprehensive phylogenetic tree of global human mitochondrial DNA variation. Hum. Mutat. 30, E386–E394 (2009).
Kong, Q. P. et al. Updating the East Asian mtDNA phylogeny: a prerequisite for the identification of pathogenic mutations. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15, 2076–2086 (2006).
Andrews, R. M. et al. Reanalysis and revision of the Cambridge reference sequence for human mitochondrial DNA. Nat. Genet. 23, 147–147 (1999).
Bandelt, H.-J., Macaulay, V. & Richards, M. Median networks: speedy construction and greedy reduction, one simulation and two case studies from human mtDNA. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 16, 8–28 (2000).
Forster, P., Harding, R., Torroni, A. & Bandelt, H.-J. Origin and evolution of Native American mtDNA variation: a reappraisal. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 59, 935 (1996).
Saillard, J., Forster, P., Lynnerup, N., Bandelt, H.-J. & Nørby, S. mtDNA variation among Greenland Eskimos: the edge of the Beringian expansion. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 67, 718–726 (2000).
Soares, P. et al. Correcting for purifying selection: an improved human mitochondrial molecular clock. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 84, 740–759 (2009).
Brandstätter, A. et al. Mitochondrial DNA control region variation in Ashkenazi Jews from Hungary. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2, e4–e6 (2008).
Zhang, W. et al. A matrilineal genetic legacy from the Last Glacial Maximum confers susceptibility to schizophrenia in Han Chinese. J. Genet. Genomics 41, 397–407 (2014).
Chen, F. et al. Analysis of mitochondrial DNA polymorphisms in Guangdong Han Chinese. Forensic Sci Int Genet 2, 150–153 (2008).
Gan, R. J. et al. Pinghua population as an exception of Han Chinese's coherent genetic structure. J. Hum. Genet. 53, 303–313 (2008).
Irwin, J. A. et al. Mitochondrial control region sequences from a Vietnamese population sample. Int. J. Legal Med. 122, 257–259 (2008).
Li, H. et al. Mitochondrial DNA diversity and population differentiation in southern East Asia. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 134, 481–488 (2007).
Peng, M. S. et al. Tracing the Austronesian footprint in Mainland Southeast Asia: a perspective from mitochondrial DNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 27, 2417–2430 (2010).
Wang, W. Z. et al. Tracing the origins of Hakka and Chaoshanese by mitochondrial DNA analysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 141, 124–130 (2010).
Wen, B. et al. Analyses of genetic structure of Tibeto-Burman populations reveals sex-biased admixture in southern Tibeto-Burmans. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 74, 856–865 (2004).
Wen, B. et al. Genetic structure of Hmong-Mien speaking populations in East Asia as revealed by mtDNA lineages. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 725–734 (2005).
Yao, Y. G., Kong, Q. P., Bandelt, H.-J., Kivisild, T. & Zhang, Y.-P. Phylogeographic differentiation of mitochondrial DNA in Han Chinese. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 70, 635–651 (2002).
Kampuansai, J. et al. Mitochondrial DNA Variation of Tai Speaking Peoples in Northern Thailand. ScienceAsia 33, 443–448 (2007).
We thank Dr. Pedro Soares for his help in time estimation. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81272309, 31123005, 31322029) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Tian, JY., Wang, HW., Li, YC. et al. A genetic contribution from the Far East into Ashkenazi Jews via the ancient Silk Road. Sci Rep 5, 8377 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08377
Scientific Reports (2020)
Journal of Human Genetics (2016)