Axonal outgrowth inhibitors and scar formation are two major obstacles to central nervous system (CNS) repair. No target molecule that regulates both axonal growth and scarring has been identified. Here we identified collapsin response mediator protein 4 (CRMP4), a common mediator of inhibitory signals after neural injury, as a crucial factor that contributes to both axonal growth inhibition and scarring after spinal cord injury (SCI). We found increases in the inhibitory and toxic forms of CRMP4 in injured spinal cord. Notably, CRMP4 expression was evident in inflammatory cells as well as in neurons after spinal cord transection. Crmp4−/− mice displayed neuroprotection against SCI and reductions in inflammatory response and scar formation. This permissive environment for axonal growth due to CRMP4 deletion restored locomotor activity at an unusually early phase of healing. These results suggest that deletion of CRMP4 is a unique therapeutic strategy that overcomes two obstacles to CNS repair after SCI.
Injured adult mammalian central nervous system (CNS) has limited regenerative ability. Recovery after CNS injury is potently restricted by two main obstacles: axon growth inhibitors and scar formation1,2,3. Myelin-associated inhibitors (MAIs), expressed in myelin sheaths surrounding CNS axons, are non-permissive as substrates for neurite outgrowth4,5. Within the scar tissue at the lesion, extracellular molecules such as members of the chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan (CSPG) family2,6,7 and repulsive guidance molecule Semaphorin3A (Sema3A)8,9 become evident after injury and inhibit the regenerative responses of axons. Although numerous reports have suggested a number of target molecules for CNS repair after traumatic injury10, no target molecule that regulates both axonal growth and scarring has been identified.
Cytoskeletal dynamics is a key factor limiting the regenerative capacity of the CNS in terms of axon formation, inflammation and scarring11,12,13,14,15,16. Collapsin response mediator protein 4 (CRMP4) is one of the CRMP family of proteins that is highly expressed in the developing and adult nervous system among vertebrates and regulates aspects of neurite growth by their binding to the cytoskeleton17,18. Sema3A-induced phosphorylation of CRMP419,20 reduces its binding affinity for tubulin heterodimer and F-actin, resulting in cytoskeletal depolymerization21,22. We and another group have demonstrated that long-form CRMP423 (CRMP4b) is required for inhibitory responses to MAIs in vitro24,25,26. This suggests the possibility of CRMP4 involvement in CSPG-induced signaling because MAIs and CSPG inhibition share intracellular mechanisms through their common receptor NgR27. Moreover, injury-induced neuronal calpain activation produces a C-terminus-truncated form of CRMP4 (tCRMP4) that initiates neuronal cell death28,29. CRMP4 is therefore a common mediator of several inhibitory signaling pathways operating after traumatic injury. However, the role of CRMP4 following a traumatic CNS injury in vivo has never been examined.
Here we characterized CRMP4 as a unique factor that is responsible for both axonal growth inhibition and scar formation after SCI. We found an increase in phosphorylated CRMP4 (pCRMP4), CRMP4b and tCRMP4 in injured spinal cord. The Crmp4−/− mice recently generated by our group30 exhibited neuroprotective effects against SCI by suppressing depolymerization of microtubules, apoptosis and demyelination. Notably, CRMP4 expression was upregulated in activated microglia/macrophage and reactive astrocytes after SCI, consistent with an observed reduction of inflammatory responses and scarring upon CRMP4 deletion. This provided a permissive environment for the growth of spinal axons and improved locomotion after SCI. Our results suggest that an inactivation of Crmp4 is a potential therapeutic strategy that addresses two main obstacles to recovery after SCI.
Increased expression levels of CRMP4 after SCI
In this study, we examined the role of CRMP4 in recovery after SCI. We first analyzed the change of CRMP4 protein expression after dorsal transection of the mouse spinal cord. To examine the temporal changes in the protein levels of CRMP4 and its phosphorylated and truncated forms after SCI, we performed immunoblotting of the spinal cord tissues at several time points post SCI. We detected three bands around the 65-kDa CRMP4a isoform with anti-CRMP4 antibody (Fig. 1a). The total amount of CRMP4a and the protein level of the 58-kDa tCRMP4 (Fig. 1a; solid arrow) were increased in injured spinal cords (Fig. 1d,e). The upper of the three bands (Fig. 1a; solid arrowhead) was identified as part of phosphorylated CRMP4 where the antibody is specific to CRMP4 phosphorylated at Ser522 (Fig. 1b). It was upregulated in both the acute and the sub-chronic phases of injury (Fig. 1f). Moreover, the 75-kDa isoform of CRMP4 was identified as CRMP4b using a specific antibody (Fig. 1c). Levels of CRMP4b were distinctly higher in injured spinal cords, peaking 1 to 2 weeks post SCI (Fig. 1a,g). These results indicate that forms of CRMP4 that are toxic or inhibitory to axonal growth were induced by SCI with a unique time course.
Next, we examined which cell types expressed CRMP4 after SCI. A markedly increased CRMP4 expression level has been reported in spinal motoneurons in the mutant SOD1 mouse model31 and in adult sensory neurons after sciatic nerve injury32. We first conducted double immunostaining for neuronal marker and CRMP4 in cross sections of spinal cords. We detected CRMP4 expression and found that it was co-localized with Nissl-positive neuronal cell bodies and MAP2-positive dendrites and somata of motoneurons in the ventral horn of intact and injured spinal cords (Fig. 2a,b). The fraction of neurons expressing these levels of CRMP4 was significantly above background in Crmp4−/− spinal cords (Fig. 2a). To analyze CRMP4 protein expression in microglia/macrophages and reactive astrocytes before, during and after inflammatory responses to SCI, we double immunostained parasagittal sections of spinal cords for CRMP4 and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a marker for normal as well as reactive astrocytes, or OX-41, a marker for microglia/macrophages33. The CRMP4 staining signal was weak in both GFAP-positive and OX-41-positive cells in the gray matter of intact spinal cord (Fig. 2c,d; open arrowheads). However, CRMP4 immunoreactivity was remarkably enhanced in both types of glial cells adjacent to the lesion site and in the astroglial scar after SCI (Fig. 2c,d; solid arrowheads).
Suppressed microtubule destabilization of axons in injured Crmp4−/− spinal cords
Given the increased expression of forms of CRMP4 inhibitory to axonal outgrowth observed after SCI, we next analyzed the effect of loss of function of CRMP4 on microtubule polymerization in injured axons in the acute phase of SCI. A previous study has shown that polymerized microtubule levels in white matter axons were decreased at 2 h post SCI34. We conducted immunostaining with anti-Glu-tubulin antibody to measure the polymerized forms of microtubules after SCI. In intact spinal cord, Glu-tubulin was present in a line along the Tuj1-positive axons in the white matter both in control Crmp4+/+ mice and in Crmp4−/− mice (Fig. 3a; arrowheads). At 2 h post SCI, the control mice showed a 50.7% reduction in the relative length of Glu-tubulin-positive axons in the dorsal white matter about 3 mm rostral to the injury site (Fig. 3b; open arrowheads). However, this decrease of microtubule polymerization in injured axons was reduced to 22.8% in Crmp4−/− mice (Fig. 3b, arrowheads; P < 0.05 compared with Fig. 3c, SCI 2 h control). This result indicates that deletion of CRMP4 contributes to stabilizing microtubules in the acute phase of SCI.
CRMP4 in glial cells contributes to inflammatory response and scarring
To clarify the role of CRMP4 upregulation in activated microglia/macrophage and reactive astrocytes (Fig. 2c,d), we next assessed the degree of inflammation in Crmp4−/− mice after traumatic injury, which induces secondary tissue damage and scarring35.
First, we utilized a non-traumatic inflammation model to clarify the role of CRMP4 in the inflammatory response. Microinjections of Zymosan A into lateral white matter of thoracic spinal cord caused marked activation of Iba1-positive microglia/macrophages and GFAP-positive astrocytes at 3 days post injection in control mice (Supplementary Fig. S1a). These activations were undetectable around a PBS injection site, indicating that micropipette insertion was non-traumatic. In contrast, Crmp4−/− exhibited dramatic reduction in the area of inflammatory activation throughout the Zymosan A injection site (P < 0.05 compared with control mice, Supplementary Fig. S1a–c). Additionally, the protein expression level of Tumor necrosis factor αlπηα (TNFα) was elevated in Zymosan A-injected spinal cord of control mice when compared with PBS-injected control mice (P < 0.05, Supplementary Fig. S1d,e). This increase was significantly reduced by deletion of CRMP4 (P < 0.05 compared with Zymosan A-injected control mice, Supplementary Fig. S1d,e).
We next examined inflammatory responses in the spinal cord after SCI. Microglia/macrophage and astrocytes exhibit small, compact somata bearing many long, thin, ramified processes in their resting state. However, activated microglia/macrophage and reactive astrocytes demonstrate marked cellular hypertrophy and retraction of cytoplasmic processes36,37. At 1 week post SCI, microglia in the dorsal horn of control spinal cords at 1.5 mm caudal to lesion epicenter exhibited an activated phenotype (Fig. 4a). In contrast, Crmp4−/− mice showed moderate expression of resident microglia exhibiting the quiescent or resting type morphology in both white and gray matter of spinal cord (Fig. 4b). The numbers of Iba1-positive cells and activated Iba1-positive cells in dorsal horn of Crmp4−/− spinal cord were decreased 13.7% and 72.1%, respectively, when compared to control spinal cord (Fig. 4g, P < 0.05; Fig. 4h, P < 0.001). GFAP-positive astroglia demonstrating a swollen hypertrophic appearance were distributed throughout both white and gray matter in injured control spinal cords (Fig. 4c). Although CRMP4 deletion had no effect on levels of such astroglial morphology in the dorsal horn of injured spinal cord (Fig. 4d), Crmp4−/− spinal cord exhibited 23.6% reduction in immunoreactivity of GFAP in the dorsal horn when compared with control spinal cord (Fig. 4i, P < 0.05). These results indicate that the activation of microglia/macrophage and astrocytes observed in Crmp4+/+ mice after injury was minimal in Crmp4−/− mice.
Third, we assessed scar formation after SCI in Crmp4−/− mice. The lesion scar in traumatic SCI consists of a fibrous scar at the lesion core surrounded by a glial scar2. We observed a collagen IV-positive fibrous scar around the lesion epicenter in control spinal cord at 1 week post SCI (Fig. 4e). However, in Crmp4−/− spinal cords, an 85.4% reduction in collagen IV-positive scar was observed (Fig. 4f,j, P < 0.05 compared with control mice,). These findings indicate that CRMP4 deletion prevents scarring by moderating inflammatory responses after SCI.
Neuroprotection at the lesion site in transected Crmp4−/− spinal cord
Extensive inflammation-induced tissue injury causes impaired CNS function because of delayed secondary neuronal damage, such as neuronal loss and demyelination38,39. Additionally, it has been suggested that the calpain-mediated C-terminus truncation product of CRMP4 (tCRMP4) is associated with neuronal apoptosis after neurotoxin treatment28. To analyze the effect of CRMP4 deletion on cell survival in lesioned spinal cords, we performed the TUNEL assay (terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick end labeling) to detect apoptosis in both groups at 1 week post injury, a time point corresponding to the peak of secondary apoptosis at the lesion site40. Crmp4−/− mice showed 68.7%, 70.9%, 63.4% and 67.5% reductions in the number of TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells at 1 mm rostral to, 1 and 2 mm caudal to and central to the lesion epicenter, respectively (P < 0.05 compared with control mice, Fig. 5a,b). Next, to examine the effect of CRMP4 deletion on tissue loss after SCI, we performed Nissl and myelin staining in serial cross sections through the lesion epicenter at 1 and 4 weeks post transection. Although differences in spinal tissue volume were not observed between Crmp4−/− spinal cord and control one at 1 week post SCI (Supplementary Fig. S2a, S3a), CRMP4 deletion resulted in tissue sparing around the lesion epicenter at 4 weeks post traumatic injury (Supplementary Fig. S2b, S3b). The Crmp4−/− spinal cord exhibited increased neuronal cell survival (Fig. 5c), spared white matter area and reduced demyelination when compared with control spinal cords at 4 weeks post SCI (Fig. 5d). These results suggest that CRMP4 deletion has a neuroprotective effect on cells at the lesion site after SCI, thereby creating a permissive environment for the regrowth of axons in the injured spinal cord.
Deletion of CRMP4 enhances axonal growth in injured spinal cord
To further characterize the role of CRMP4 in limiting axonal growth in vivo, we performed immunohistochemical analyses of spinal cords after injury, avoiding the sections of the control spinal cords that had large cavitations, to obtain a clearer histological comparison with sections of Crmp4−/− spinal cords. We detected an increased density of growth-associated protein 43 (GAP43)-positive regenerating or sprouting axons caudal to the lesion site in Crmp4−/− mice at 18 days post SCI, while almost no expression of GAP43 in axons within and caudal to the injury site was observed in control mice (Fig. 6a). To examine which type of spinal fibers are GAP43-positive, we conducted immunostaining of GAP43 in cross sections caudal to injury site (Supplementary Fig. S4). In control mice, GAP43-positive fibers were observed only in the dorsal horn (arrowheads), which are ascending tracts from dorsal root ganglion. In contrast, Crmp4−/− spinal cords exhibited clear signals of GAP43 at the location of descending corticospinal tract (CST) fibers (arrows) as well as ascending tracts in the dorsal horn (arrowheads). To confirm the elevated axonal growth, we also performed immunoblotting analysis with anti-GAP43 antibody using tissue samples from intact and injured spinal cords of both groups. We detected GAP43 protein expression in the spinal cords of both groups at 18 days post SCI, but not in the intact spinal cord. We observed a significantly higher level of GAP43 protein in Crmp4−/− spinal tissue than in controls (Fig. 6b,c).
In this study, we utilized a 1.5-mm-depth near-complete dorsal transection model41 to sever the whole gray matter of the spinal cord and a group of defined pathways, including raphespinal and CST axons and all their branches, leading to hindlimb paralysis. The serotonergic (that is, 5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]-positive) raphespinal system contributes to locomotor circuitry and can be assessed in an anterograde fashion by simple immunohistology, since it is the only source of serotonergic input to the adult spinal cord. In control mice with dorsally transected spinal cords, 5-HT-immunoreactive fibers were observed as a few subsets caudal to the lesion site, at 4 weeks post SCI (Fig. 6d). However, in Crmp4−/− transected spinal tissue, a high density of 5-HT-positive fibers was detectable in parasagittal sections on the far side of the lesion (caudal to the epicenter). Crmp4−/− spinal cord exhibited 147.8% increase in immunoreactivity of 5-HT within 1–2 mm caudal to injury site when compared to controls (Fig. 6f, P < 0.05). Cross sections of spinal cord at a level 4 mm caudal to a complete transaction were also examined for 5-HT-positive profiles (Fig. 6e). As previously reported42, the highest density of innervations was in the ventral horn and was observed in both groups rostral to the lesion site. 5-HT fiber density at 3 mm rostral to lesion was not different between genotypes (Fig. 6e). Although the length of serotonergic fiber at the 4-mm-caudal level was essentially undetectable in injured control spinal cord, a significant proportion of raphespinal fibers were observed in the ventral horn of the distal cord following injury in Crmp4−/− mice (Fig. 6e).
To examine whether deletion of CRMP4 induces CST growth, we used a yellow fluorescent protein (YFP)-expressing mouse line (YFP-H)43. In this transgenic mouse, corticospinal neurons in layer V of the cerebral cortex and their projecting axons in the spinal cord are strongly YFP-positive, with relatively weak YFP signal in some ascending dorsal column axons from dorsal root ganglion neurons, projections in the lateral and ventral columns and motoneurons43. Because of its strong YFP signal in CST, this mouse line was used for evaluation of recovery from SCI44. To summarize the pattern of CST fiber growth rostral and caudal to the injury, we reconstructed all the serial microscopic images from parasagittal sections that included YFP-positive CST fibers. Proximal to the lesion at 4 weeks post SCI, the main CST appears as a tight bundle of fibers, with the labeled fibers neither entering nor growing beyond the lesion site in sagittal sections from control mice (Fig. 6g; solid arrowheads, 6g′,g″). In addition, the control mice exhibited almost no fibers in normal CST locations 3 mm caudal to the lesion site (Fig. 6h; open arrowheads). In contrast, significant numbers of YFP-positive fibers growing into the lesion scar and along cysts were observed in injured Crmp4−/− spinal cord (Fig. 6g; solid arrow, 6g′,g″). Moreover, we observed a higher density of YFP-positive main CST axons presenting in their normal position 3 mm caudal to the lesion in Crmp4−/− mice when compared to control mice (Fig. 6h; solid arrow, Fig. 6i, P < 0.05). Taken together, the evidence shows that deletion of CRMP4 enhanced axonal regrowth or sprouting after near-complete transection of the spinal cord.
Locomotor recovery in Crmp4−/− mice after SCI
To examine behavioral function in Crmp4−/− mice after SCI, we used the Basso Mouse Scale for locomotion (BMS)45 to assess hindlimb motor function. In all the mice used in this study, hindlimb movement was abolished immediately after near-complete transection. At 4 weeks post SCI, hindlimb paralysis showed slight recovery in control mice (average BMS score: 1.57 ± 0.32, mean ± S.E.M., Fig. 7a,b), in agreement with results from a previous study using a near-complete-transection model in wild-type mice41. In contrast, the Crmp4−/− mice had a significantly higher BMS score (5.29 ± 0.31, mean ± S.E.M., Fig. 4a,c; Supplementary Movie 1). Notably, due to neuroprotection and reduced scar formation with CRMP4 deletion, many of these mice could move all joints of the hindlimbs freely and could support their own weight around 1 week post SCI, which is considered early for the recovery phase of an injury (Fig. 4a,d).
The hypothesis that CRMP4 contributes to the limitation of recovery after adult CNS trauma is supported by several major findings from this study on Crmp4−/− mice. First, the expression levels of pCRMP4, tCRMP4 and CRMP4b, which are suggested to contribute considerably to limiting axonal growth and to promoting cell death, are significantly increased at the lesion site in spinal cord (Fig. 1). Second, increased CRMP4 expression in activated microglia/macrophages and reactive astrocytes might contribute to secondary injury, including inflammation and scarring after spinal cord lesion (Fig. 2, 4, Supplementary Fig. S1). Third, the deletion of CRMP4 has neuroprotective effects including preservation of microtubule polymerization, cell survival, delayed demyelination and tissue sparing. This leads to axonal growth and behavioral recovery after SCI (Fig. 3, 5, 6, 7, Supplementary Fig. S2, S3). Although cytoskeletal dynamics is commonly involved in several axon-inhibitory responses as well as in the key glial processes during inflammation and scarring11,12,13,14, no target molecule has been characterized for the missing link between axon formation and scarring. The current study demonstrates that CRMP4 is a uniquely potent factor for preventing axonal regrowth after SCI through its inhibitory and toxic effects on neurons as well as through its inflammatory effects on reactive astrocytes and microglia/macrophages.
There are several possible explanations for the evident functional recovery at an early stage after SCI in Crmp4−/− mice (Fig. 7). First, CRMP4 deletion could diminish the convergent signals from post SCI extracellular inhibitory factors in controlling cytoskeletal dynamics in axons. The involvement of CRMP4 in axonal inhibitory responses in vitro has been previously described24,25,26. For instance, we have shown that Myelin-associated glycoprotein-induced growth cone collapse and axonal outgrowth inhibition are significantly reduced in cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons from Crmp4−/− mice24. Moreover, a previous in vitro study demonstrated that CRMP4b physically and functionally interacts with RhoA in a MAI-dependent manner, leading to inhibition of neurite outgrowth25. However, the role of CRMP4 in CNS injuries in vivo was until now largely unknown. Here, we detect immunoreactivity for CRMP4 co-localized with a neuronal marker in intact and injured spinal cord (Fig. 2a,b), supported by previous studies showing CRMP4 expression in motoneurons in the mutant SOD1 mouse model31 and after sciatic nerve injury32. Moreover, we observe that CRMP4b protein expression is increased in injured axons at 2 h post SCI and that deletion of CRMP4 restored microtubule polymerization at this time point (Fig. 1a,g, Fig. 3). A previous report showed that RhoA was activated in neurons and glial cells in the white matter surrounding the injury site at the same time point post SCI46. Our findings thus support an inhibitory function for the RhoA-CRMP4b complex in the injured spinal cord. Moreover, Sema3A-induced phosphorylation of CRMP4 induces failure of axonal formation and elongation via disruption of CRMP4 binding to microtubules and actin19,21. It has been reported that Wallerian degeneration is mediated by CRMP phosphorylation47. We detected elevation of CRMP4 phosphorylation levels after SCI (Fig. 1a,b,f); it is thus possible that phosphorylated forms of CRMP4 also contribute to cytoskeletal degradation during axonal degeneration after SCI. Indeed, Crmp4−/− exhibited a suppression of microtubule destabilization and white matter degeneration after spinal cord transection (Fig. 3, 5d, Supplementary Fig. S2). Additionally, our preliminary experiment showed the reduction of inhibitory response to CSPG in Crmp4−/− cultured dorsal root ganglion neurons when compared to Crmp4+/+ control (unpublished observation by R.T, J. N. and T. O.). These results imply that in this study, CRMP4 deletion contributes to axonal extension by blocking its mediation of MAIs, Sema3A and CSPG-induced growth cone collapse pathways.
Next, CRMP4 deletion had neuroprotective effects on neurons after traumatic lesion, such as decreased apoptosis and neuron loss (Fig. 5a–c), leading to sparing of tissue (Supplementary Fig. S2, S3). Calpain is activated in injured spinal cord from a few minutes to several hours post SCI and is found to induce cell death in motor neurons48,49. Activated calpain truncates CRMP4 at the C-terminus and produces a 58-kDa form called tCRMP4. The latter induces neuronal apoptosis after both in vitro neurotoxin treatment and in vivo acute traumatic brain injury28,29. We detected immediate upregulation of tCRMP4 post SCI (Fig. 1a,e) and observed a significant decrease in the number of apoptotic cells and neurons lost after spinal cord transection in the mutant (Fig. 5a–c), suggesting that deletion of tCRMP4 suppresses cell death after SCI.
Finally, we observed an early functional recovery in the mutant possibly due to reduced acute inflammatory responses and inhibition of scarring (Fig. 4 and Supplementary Fig. 1). Activation of microglia/macrophages, which causes production of proinflammatory cytokines and neurotoxic molecules, is implicated in secondary injury35. Reactive astrocytes are the major cellular component of the glial scar, considered a physical and chemical barrier to CNS regeneration and producing several classes of growth inhibiting molecules2. It has been reported that the overexpression of intrinsic anti-inflammatory molecule induced locomotor recovery within 1–2 weeks after SCI, which is an early phase of injury50. The initiation of inflammatory processes might be triggered by the release of toxic molecules from degenerating axons51,52. Therefore, the reduction of the inflammatory response at 1 week post SCI in Crmp4−/− (Fig. 4a–d) may have been caused by suppression of microtubule disassembly leading to reduction of axonal degeneration in a non-cell autonomous manner. Nevertheless, a recent in vitro study demonstrated that CRMP4 mediates the migratory and phagocytic capability of activated microglia via CRMP binding to F-actin53. We observed a dramatic reduction of non-traumatic inflammation in Crmp4−/− spinal cord (Supplementary Fig. S1) and an upregulation of CRMP4 in activated microglia/macrophages and reactive astrocytes after SCI (Fig. 2c,d), suggesting the possibility that CRMP4 deletion suppresses inflammation in a cell-autonomous manner in vivo. Although further investigation is needed to clarify the molecular mechanisms of the role of CRMP4 in inflammation, our results strongly suggest that a marked reduction of inflammation in this model due to deletion of CRMP4 (Fig. 4a–d, Supplementary Fig. S1), leading to drastic inhibition of scar formation (Fig. 4e–g), contributes to early locomotor recovery post SCI (Fig. 7).
We observed that deletion of CRMP4 enhanced immunoreactivities to GAP43 and 5-HT far caudal to the lesion epicenter, suggesting long-distance regrowth, or sprouting of serotonergic raphespinal fibers (Fig. 6a–e). We also identified CST axons using YFP-H mice43 where CSTs are clearly visualized as previously described44. While YFP-positive main dorsal CSTs disappeared within and caudal to the lesion site at 4 weeks post SCI in control mice, the genetic deletion of Crmp4 promoted extensive regrowth or sprouting of a subset of CST axons within and into the distal (caudal) side of the lesion site (Fig. 6f,g). Distally, we observed more apparent YFP signals at the normal position of the main dorsal CST in Crmp4−/− mice than in the controls (Fig. 6g), suggesting that these results were due to sprouting of neighboring spared axon terminals rather than regeneration of transected axons. This conclusion seems to be strongly supported by the observed massive decrease of microtubule destabilization (Fig. 3), the decrease in secondary tissue injuries (Fig. 4,5a,5b) and the sparing of tissue (Fig. 5c,d, Supplementary Fig. S2, S3). However, it is particularly challenging to distinguish regeneration from sprouting and to detect inadvertently spared axons, because the CST axons descend in several different tracts3. Combinatorial modulations of both intrinsic neuronal mechanisms and extrinsic mechanisms after CNS injuries are required for long-distance axonal regeneration or sprouting and marked functional recovery after SCI10,54. Our results showed that the significant early locomotor recovery and long-distance axonal regrowth or sprouting caused by CRMP4 deletion were achieved by reducing cytoskeletal destabilization in axons and by reducing inflammatory responses, the latter leading to limited scar formation.
From a clinical perspective, it is desirable to target molecules with minimal side effects. For instance, the high lethality of Sema3A−/− mice raises concerns over possible strong side effects of targeting Sema3A55. CRMP4 has been shown to be highly expressed in the nervous system20. Our present results show expression of CRMP4 in neurons, activated microglia/macrophages and reactive astrocytes, but not in these cells in a resting state. Moreover, we observe that mice lacking CRMP4 show no gross changes in body growth or fertility. These data suggest that altering CRMP4 expression may have minimal side effects on other organs when compared to targeting ubiquitous molecules such as RhoA. Thus, CRMP4 could be a candidate target in the development of neuroregenerative medicines. A peptide construct that expresses the unique N-terminal domain of CRMP4b (C4RIP– CRMP4b–RhoA inhibitory peptide) would be advantageous for use in the complex inhibitory environment prevailing after CNS injury in vivo25,26. While the therapeutic potential of stem/progenitor cells in cell replacement strategies for SCI has been reported56, numerous obstacles presented by the surrounding environment, such as secondary tissue damage and the expression of inhibitory molecules associated with scarring, still need to be overcome. Therefore, future directions should focus on the concurrent regulation of CRMP4 and other treatments/therapeutic modalities such as cell transplantation or neurotrophic factors57.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that deletion of a single protein—CRMP4—resulted in the reduction of axonal outgrowth inhibition in neurons, inflammatory responses of glia and scarring responses of glia, thereby promoting axonal growth and functional recovery after SCI. CRMP4 may be a possible therapeutic target for the treatment of human patients with SCI.
The mice used in the experiments were housed in accordance with the technical protocols for animal experiments approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Waseda University (2013-A085). Crmp4−/− mice were generated and maintained in 129/Sv × C57BL/6J hybrid background as previously described30. The control Crmp4+/+ mice and Crmp4−/− mice were obtained by intercrossing Crmp4+/− mice and their offspring. YFP-H mice (Jackson laboratory, ME, USA)43 were crossed with Crmp4−/− mice for the analysis of corticospinal tract axons. All the experimenters were blinded to the genotype and treatment condition.
All surgical procedures and postoperative care were performed in accordance with guidelines of Waseda University. Mice (6–9 weeks old) were utilized for all experiments. Mice were deeply anesthetized with 2–4% isoflurane (DS Pharma Animal Health) using an inhalation anesthesia apparatus (KN-1071 NARCOBIT-E (II), Natsume Seisakusho). Laminectomies were performed at 7–8th thoracic spinal cord levels (T7–T8), exposing the spinal cord. A 1.5-mm-deep near-complete dorsal transection41 was performed at T7–T8 using a pair of microscissors (NAPOX® MB-50-15, Natsume Seisakusho) and the tip of a 28-gauge needle to sever dorsal white matter, all the gray matter, the 5-HT-positive raphespinal tract and the main dorsal CST. The skin on the back was closed with a nylon stitch (USP4-0, JIS No. 2, Natsume Seisakusho). After the operation, the mice were kept warm, placed on beds of sawdust and given manual bladder evacuation once per day. Food was provided on the cage floor and the mice had no difficulty, accessing water. The mice that showed 0–1 points of BMS score at 1 day after SCI were used for the following experiments and analyses.
The tissue sampling and Western blotting were performed as previously described9,58 with some modifications. A 3-mm length of spinal cord tissue centered on the injury site or injection site were dissected out at 2 and 24 h after SCI from male and female WT C57BL/6J mice and at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 14 weeks after SCI from female WT C57BL/6J mice and intact female WT C57BL/6J mice (n = 3 mice for each time point). The tissue samples were homogenized in lysis buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4, 1% Nonidet P-40, proteinase inhibitor (Complete proteinase inhibitor cocktail, 11 873 580 001, Roche) and phosphatase inhibitor (PhosphoStop, 04 906 845 001, Roche)] as previously described (Ohshima et al., 2007). The homogenates were centrifuged at 1,200 rpm for 15 minutes (min) at 4 degrees. The supernatants were assayed for protein concentration using Bio-Rad Protein Assay Dye Reagent Concentrate (500-0006, Bio-Rad Laboratories) and a spectrophotometer (Gene Quant 1300, GE Healthcare). The proteins were separated on 12.5% or 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-PAGE gels and then transferred to Immobilon®-P Transfer Membranes (IPVH07850, Millipore). After the transfer, the membranes were placed in tris-buffered saline (TBS) with 0.05% Polyoxyethylene (20) Sorbitan Monolaurate (Tween 20) (166-21115, Wako) (0.05% TBST) containing 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (A7906, Sigma-Aldrich) overnight (O/N) at 4 degrees to block nonspecific binding. The blots were incubated for 1 h with following primary antibodies: anti-CRMP4 (rabbit IgG, 1:1000, AB5454, Millipore), anti-CRMP4b (rabbit IgG, kindly provided by Dr. Quinn), anti-phosphorylated (at Ser 522) CRMP4 (rabbit IgG, 1:1000)30, anti-α-tubulin (rabbit IgG, 1:1000, T6199, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-GAP43 (rabbit IgG, 1:1000, ab16053, Abcam), anti-β-tubulin (rabbit IgG, 1:1000, T8328, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-TNFα (rabbit IgG, AB2148P, Millipore), diluted in blocking buffer at room temperature (RT). The membranes were then washed in 0.05% TBST three times for 10 min and incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (1:10,000, sc-2005 or sc-2004, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at RT for 1 h. After washing in 0.05% TBST three times for 10 min, the membranes were developed using a color substrate. (Pierce® Western Blotting Substrate Plus, NCI32132JP, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The reaction was stopped by washing each membrane with TBS. Tubulin was detected in parallel as loading controls. The membranes were scanned with a Luminescent Image Analyzer (LAS-3000, Fujifilm) and the resulting digital images were quantified and normalized relative to tubulin level for each sample using the ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).
The mice were perfused after injury with ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS solution. A 15-mm length of spinal cord centered on the injury site or injection site was dissected out and postfixed O/N in the same fixative. Then the spinal cord was soaked in a succession of solutions at 4 degrees O/N (PBS, 10% sucrose and 20% sucrose, respectively) and embedded in a 2:1 mixture of Tissue Tek® optimal cutting temperature (OCT) compound (4583, Sakura Finetek) and 20% sucrose for cryostat sectioning (30 μm) on a Cryostat (CM1860, Leica). The sections were mounted on MAS-coated glass slides (S9441, Matsunami) and stored at −20 degrees until further analysis. We performed immunofluorescence staining was performed as previously described (Ohshima et al., 2007). Prior to staining, tissue sections were dried in air for 1 h and washed in PBS for 30 min followed by permeabilizing and blocking with 3% normal horse serum (HS, S-2000, Vector Laboratories) diluted with 0.1% Polyoxyethylene (10) Octylphenyl Esther (Triton X-100, 169-21105, Wako)/PBS (PBST) for 1 h. Incubation at 4 degrees O/N was carried out with the following primary antibodies; anti-CRMP4 (rabbit IgG, 1:200, AB5454, Millipore), anti-MAP2 (mouse IgG, 1:200, MAB3418, Millipore), anti-detyrosinated α-tubulin (Glu-tubulin) (rabbit IgG, 1:500, ab24622, Abcam), anti-neuron-specific class III β-tubulin (Tuj1, mouse IgG, 1:1000, MMS-435P, Covance), anti-GFAP (mouse IgG, 1:400, G3893, Sigma-Aldrich), anti-OX-41 (mouse IgG, 1:200, MAB1407P, Millipore), anti-Iba1 (rabbit IgG, 1:500, 019-19741, Wako) and anti-GFAP (rabbit IgG, 1:500, Z0334, Dako) antibodies. After being washed in 0.01% PBST (three times, 10 min), sections were incubated with the secondary antibodies [Alexa Fluor® 488 or 568 goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) or Alexa Fluor® 594 goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L), 1:1000, A11008, A11011, A11005, Invitrogen and NeuroTrace® 530/615 red fluorescent Nissl stain, 1:250, N-21482, Molecular Probes] in 0.01% PBST for 1 h at RT. Finally, the slides were washed three times for 10 min in 0.01% PBST and once in PBS for 1 min before being dried and coverslipped. For immunostaining with anti-GAP43 (rabbit IgG, 1:200, ab16053, Abcam) and anti-collagen IV antibody (1:200, ab19808, Abcam), the sections were blocked with 5% HS in PBS for 1 h and permeabilized with 0.2% Tween 20 in PBS four times for 5 min and 5% HS in 0.1% PBST for 1 h. For immunostaining with anti-5-HT (rabbit IgG, 1:4000, 20080, Immunostar), tissue sections were washed in high-salt buffer (HSB; 500 mM NaCl, 9.2 mM NaH2PO4, 12.5 mM Na2HPO4) three times for 10 min and blocked with 5% HS diluted with 0.3% Triton X-100 in HSB. After primary and secondary antibody reaction, the slides were washed three times for 10 min with HSB. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) using Apop Tag Red (S7165, Millipore) was performed to detect apoptotic cells in the transected spinal cord, following manufacturer's protocol. FluoroMyelin™ Red Fluorescent Myelin Stain (F34652, Molecular Probes) was used to reveal myelin distributions in the transected spinal cord, following manufacturer's protocol. Nuclear staining was performed with anti-fade mounting media Vectorshield® Mounting Medium for Fluorescence with DAPI (H-1200, Vector Laboratories) in identical sections. Images were visualized using microscopy (BX51, Olympus and BZ 8100, Keyence) and confocal fluorescence microscopy (FV-1000, Olympus).
Quantification for immunohistochemistry
To analyze Glu-tubulin distribution in the axons, we measured the length of Glu-tubulin-positive and Tuj1-positive fibers in each section of the spinal cords as previously described in detail34. Briefly, the area of dorsal white matter in the rostral and caudal stump, ~3 mm rostrally from the injury site, was studied. The average length of a subset of fibers was calculated and the data was normalized to the percentage of control. For each experimental condition, four random images from each of the three independent sections from three mice were captured and 3 sections containing at least 20 axons per mouse were analyzed. The lesion volume was delineated by its bounding surface, which is defined by a series of closed contours in the serial sections. For the quantification, 2–4 serial cross sections taken every 300 μm or serial parasagittal sections taken every 180 μm sections were analyzed as previously described59 with some modifications. The areas of the microglial and astroglial activation, collagen IV-positive scar and the immunoreactivity of GFAP and 5-HTwas quantified with NIH ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health). For analysis of inflammatory responses after SCI, images of cross sections at 1.5 mm caudal to lesion site were analyzed. Zymosan A-induced inflammatory responses were examined 750 μm rostral and caudal to the injection site. Counts of the numbers of TUNEL-positive apoptotic cells with DAPI-positive nuclei were performed within areas both 2.5 mm rostral and 2.5 mm caudal to the epicenter of injury. Quantification of 5-HT immunoreactivity was analyzed within 1–2 mm caudal to lesion epicenter of parasagittal sections.
Non-traumatic intraspinal microinjection of Zymosan A was performed as previously described60. Briefly, 50 nL Zymosan A (12.5 mg/ml, 273-01491, Wako) or 0.1 M PBS were injected into the lateral funiculi of spinal cords 1–1.2 mm lateral to the spinal cord midline and 0.5–0.7 mm deep at the level of T7/8. Injections were carried out over 5 min using calibrated pressure ejection (Harvard Apparatus, Pump 11 Elite Syringe Pumps). Mice were sacrificed at 3 days after injection and then analyzed.
Hindlimb motor function was evaluated 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after injury (n = 7 per group) using the locomotor rating of the Basso Mouse Scale (BMS) as previously described in detail45. This scale ranges from 0, indicating complete paralysis, to 9, indicating normal movement of the hindlimbs. A team of two experienced examiners evaluated each animal for 3–5 min and assigned a score based on a defined method where performance of the left and right hindlimbs was averaged.
Statistical differences between two groups were calculated with an unpaired two-tailed Student's t test. Behavioral analysis was performed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the rest of the data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett's or Tukey's post-hoc multiple-comparison test as appropriate to the design. The variance similarity between two samples was confirmed using F-test. All analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism software version 6.0b.
Yiu, G. & He, Z. Glial inhibition of CNS axon regeneration. Nat Rev Neurosci 7, 617–27 (2006).
Silver, J. & Miller, J. H. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci 5, 146–56 (2004).
Tuszynski, M. H. & Steward, O. Concepts and methods for the study of axonal regeneration in the CNS. Neuron 74, 777–91 (2012).
Filbin, M. T. Myelin-associated inhibitors of axonal regeneration in the adult mammalian CNS. Nat Rev Neurosci 4, 703–13 (2003).
Lee, J. K. & Zheng, B. Role of myelin-associated inhibitors in axonal repair after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 235, 33–42 (2012).
Bradbury, E. J. et al. Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 416, 636–40 (2002).
Bradbury, E. J. & Carter, L. M. Manipulating the glial scar: Chondroitinase ABC as a therapy for spinal cord injury. Brain Res Bull 84, 306–316 (2011).
Winter, F. De. et al. Injury-Induced Class 3 Semaphorin Expression in the Rat Spinal Cord.Exp Neurol 175, 61–75 (2002).
Kaneko, S. et al. A selective Sema3A inhibitor enhances regenerative responses and functional recovery of the injured spinal cord. Nat Med 12, 1380–1389 (2006).
Liu, K., Tedeschi, A., Park, K. K. & He, Z. Neuronal Intrinsic Mechanisms of Axon Regeneration. Annu Rev Neurosci 34, 131–152 (2011).
Hellal, F. et al. Microtubule stabilization reduces scarring and causes axon regeneration after spinal cord injury. Science 331, 928–31 (2011).
Westermann, S. & Weber, K. Post-translational modifications regulate microtubule function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4, 938 (2003).
Fournier, A. E., Takizawa, B. T. & Strittmatter, S. M. Rho kinase inhibition enhances axonal regeneration in the injured CNS. J Neurosci 23, 1416–23 (2003).
Renault-Mihara, F. et al. Beneficial compaction of spinal cord lesion by migrating astrocytes through glycogen synthase kinase-3 inhibition. EMBO Mol Med 3, 682–96 (2011).
Witte, H., Neukirchen, D. & Bradke, F. Microtubule stabilization specifies initial neuronal polarization. J Cell Biol 180, 619–32 (2008).
Ertürk, A., Hellal, F., Enes, J. & Bradke, F. Disorganized microtubules underlie the formation of retraction bulbs and the failure of axonal regeneration. J Neurosci 27, 9169–80 (2007).
Goshima, Y., Nakamura, F., Strittmatter, P. & Strittmatter, S. M. Collapsin-induced growth cone collapse mediated by an intracellular protein related to UNC-33. Nature 376, 509–514 (1995).
Wang, L. H. & Strittmatter, S. M. A family of rat CRMP genes is differentially expressed in the nervous system. J Neurosci 16, 6197–207 (1996).
Cole, A. R. et al. Distinct Priming Kinases Contribute to Differential Regulation of Collapsin Response Mediator Proteins by Glycogen Synthase kinase-3 in vivo. J Biol Chem 281, 16591–16598 (2006).
Yamashita, N. & Goshima, Y. Collapsin response mediator proteins regulate neuronal development and plasticity by switching their phosphorylation status. Mol Neurobiol 45, 234–46 (2012).
Fukata, Y. et al. CRMP-2 binds to tubulin heterodimers to promote microtubule assembly. Nat Cell Biol 4, 583–91 (2002).
Rosslenbroich, V. et al. Collapsin response mediator protein-4 regulates F-actin bundling. Exp Cell Res 310, 434–44 (2005).
Yuasa-Kawada, J. et al. Axonal morphogenesis controlled by antagonistic roles of two CRMP subtypes in microtubule organization. Eur J Neurosci 17, 2329–2343 (2003).
Nagai, J., Goshima, Y. & Ohshima, T. CRMP4 mediates MAG-induced inhibition of axonal outgrowth and protection against Vincristine-induced axonal degeneration. Neurosci Lett 519, 56–61 (2012).
Alabed, Y. Z., Pool, M., Ong Tone, S. & Fournier, A. E. Identification of CRMP4 as a convergent regulator of axon outgrowth inhibition. J Neurosci 27, 1702–11 (2007).
Alabed, Y. Z., Pool, M., Ong Tone, S., Sutherland, C. & Fournier, A. E. GSK3 beta regulates myelin-dependent axon outgrowth inhibition through CRMP4. J Neurosci 30, 5635–43 (2010).
Dickendesher, T. L. et al. NgR1 and NgR3 are receptors for chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans. Nat Neurosci 15, 703–712 (2012).
Zhang, Z. et al. Calpain-Mediated Collapsin Response Mediator Protein-1, -2, And -4 Proteolysis after Neurotoxic And Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma 24, 460–472 (2007).
Liu, W. et al. Calpain-truncated CRMP-3 and -4 contribute to potassium deprivation-induced apoptosis of cerebellar granule neurons. Proteomics 9, 3712–28 (2009).
Niisato, E. et al. CRMP4 suppresses apical dendrite bifurcation of CA1 pyramidal neurons in the mouse hippocampus. Dev Neurobiol 72, 1447–57 (2012).
Duplan, L. et al. Collapsin response mediator protein 4a (CRMP4a) is upregulated in motoneurons of mutant SOD1 mice and can trigger motoneuron axonal degeneration and cell death. J Neurosci 30, 785–96 (2010).
Jang, S. Y. et al. Injury-induced CRMP4 expression in adult sensory neurons; a possible target gene for ciliary neurotrophic factor. Neurosci Lett 485, 37–42 (2010).
Tumosa, N. & Baker, J. R. Microglia in the nerve fiber layer of the cat retina: detection of postnatal changes by a new monoclonal antibody. Vis Neurosci 13, 671–82 (1996).
Mimura, F. et al. Myelin-associated glycoprotein inhibits microtubule assembly by a Rho-kinase-dependent mechanism. J Biol Chem 281, 15970–9 (2006).
Fitch, M. T., Doller, C., Combs, C. K., Landreth, G. E. & Silver, J. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of glial scarring and progressive cavitation: in vivo and in vitro analysis of inflammation-induced secondary injury after CNS trauma. J Neurosci 19, 8182–98 (1999).
Hains, B. C. & Waxman, S. G. Activated Microglia Contribute to the Maintenance of Chronic Pain after Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurosci 26, 4308–4317 (2006).
Zhang, F. et al. Selective activation of microglia in spinal cord but not higher cortical regions following nerve injury in adult mouse. Mol Pain 4, 1–16 (2008).
Okada, S. et al. Conditional ablation of Stat3 or Socs3 discloses a dual role for reactive astrocytes after spinal cord injury. Nat Med 12, 829–834 (2006).
Herrmann, J. E. et al. STAT3 is a Critical Regulator of Astrogliosis and Scar Formation after Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurosci 28, 7231–7243 (2008).
Liu, X. Z. et al. Neuronal and Glial Apoptosis after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurosci 17, 5395–5406 (1997).
Hill, R. L. et al. Anatomical and Functional Outcomes following a Precise, Graded, Dorsal Laceration Spinal Cord Injury in C57BL/6 Mice. J Neurotrauma 15, 1–15 (2009).
Kim, J. -E., Liu, B. P., Park, J. H. & Strittmatter, S. M. Nogo-66 receptor prevents raphespinal and rubrospinal axon regeneration and limits functional recovery from spinal cord injury. Neuron 44, 439–51 (2004).
Feng, G. et al. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron 28, 41–51 (2000).
Carter, L. M. et al. The yellow fluorescent protein (YFP-H) mouse reveals neuroprotection as a novel mechanism underlying chondroitinase ABC-mediated repair after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 28, 14107–20 (2008).
Basso, D. M. et al. Basso Mouse Scale for Locomotion Detects Differences in Recovery after Spinal Cord Injury in Five Common Mouse Strains. J Neurotrauma 23, 635–659 (2006).
Dubreuil, C. I., Winton, M. J. & McKerracher, L. Rho activation patterns after spinal cord injury and the role of activated Rho in apoptosis in the central nervous system. J Cell Biol 162, 233–43 (2003).
Wakatsuki, S., Saitoh, F. & Araki, T. ZNRF1 promotes Wallerian degeneration by degrading AKT to induce GSK3B-dependent CRMP2 phosphorylation. Nat Cell Biol 13, 1415–23 (2011).
Banik, N. L., Hogan, E. L., Powers, J. M. & Smith, K. P. Proteolytic enzymes in experimental spinal cord injury. J Neurol Sci 73, 245–56 (1986).
Springer, J. E., Azbill, R. D., Kennedy, S. E., George, J. & Geddes, J. W. Rapid calpain I activation and cytoskeletal protein degradation following traumatic spinal cord injury: attenuation with riluzole pretreatment. J Neurochem 69, 1592–600 (1997).
Ghasemlou, N. et al. Beneficial effects of secretory leukocyte protease inhibitor after spinal cord injury. Brain 133, 126–38 (2010).
Mcdonald, J. W., Althomsons, S. P., Hyrc, K. L., Choi, D. & Goldberg, M. P. Oligodendrocytes from forebrain are highly vulnerable to AMPA/kainate receptor-mediated excitotoxicity. Nat Med 4, 291–297 (1998).
Beattie, M. S., Farooqui, A. A. & Bresnahan, J. C. Review of Current Evidence for Apoptosis After Spinal Cord Injury. J Neurotrauma 17, 915–925 (2000).
Manivannan, J., Tay, S. S. W., Ling, E. & Dheen, S. T. Dihydropyrimidinase-like 3 regulates the inflammatory response of activated microglia. Neuroscience 253, 40–54 (2013).
Takeuchi, K. et al. Chondroitin sulphate N-acetylgalactosaminyl-transferase-1 inhibits recovery from neural injury. Nat Commun 4, 2740 (2013).
Taniguchi, M. et al. Disruption of semaphorin III/D gene causes severe abnormality in peripheral nerve projection. Neuron 19, 519–30 (1997).
Nori, S. et al. Grafted human-induced pluripotent stem-cell-derived neurospheres promote motor functional recovery after spinal cord injury in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108, 16825–30 (2011).
Cai, D., Shen, Y., De Bellard, M., Tang, S. & Filbin, M. T. Prior exposure to neurotrophins blocks inhibition of axonal regeneration by MAG and myelin via a cAMP-dependent mechanism. Neuron 22, 89–101 (1999).
Ohshima, T. et al. Cdk5 is required for multipolar-to-bipolar transition during radial neuronal migration and proper dendrite development of pyramidal neurons in the cerebral cortex. Development 134, 2273–82 (2007).
Park, S. et al. Thiazolidinedione class of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ agonists prevents neuronal damage, motor dysfunction, myelin loss, neuropathic pain and inflammation after spinal cord. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 320, 1002–1012 (2007).
Popovich, P. G. et al. The neuropathological and behavioral consequences of intraspinal microglial/macrophage activation. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 61, 623–33 (2002).
We thank Dr. Christopher Quinn for providing anti-CRMP4b antibody and Dr. Joshua Sanes for providing GFP-M mice. This work was supported by grants from Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Fellows (J.N.), Global COE for Practical Chemical Wisdom Research Grant for Research Assistant (J.N.), JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26430043 (T.O.) and Waseda University Grant for Special Research Projects (2013B-171 to T.O.).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Movie 1
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Nagai, J., Kitamura, Y., Owada, K. et al. Crmp4 deletion promotes recovery from spinal cord injury by neuroprotection and limited scar formation. Sci Rep 5, 8269 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08269
This article is cited by
Neuroprotective Effects of Oxymatrine via Triggering Autophagy and Inhibiting Apoptosis Following Spinal Cord Injury in Rats
Molecular Neurobiology (2023)
An increase in Semaphorin 3A biases the axonal direction and induces an aberrant dendritic arborization in an in vitro model of human neural progenitor differentiation
Cell & Bioscience (2022)
Pericyte Biology in the Optic Nerve and Retina
Current Tissue Microenvironment Reports (2022)
Loss of Collapsin Response Mediator Protein 4 Attenuates 6-Hydroxydopamine-Induced Impairments in a Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease
Neurochemical Research (2020)
Human CRMP4 mutation and disrupted Crmp4 expression in mice are associated with ASD characteristics and sexual dimorphism
Scientific Reports (2017)
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.