Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Lab-on-a-brain: Implantable micro-optical fluidic devices for neural cell analysis in vivo

Abstract

The high-resolution imaging of neural cells in vivo has brought about great progress in neuroscience research. Here, we report a novel experimental platform, where the intact brain of a living mouse can be studied with the aid of a surgically implanted micro-optical fluidic device; acting as an interface between neurons and the outer world. The newly developed device provides the functions required for the long-term and high-resolution observation of the fine structures of neurons by two-photon laser scanning microscopy and the microfluidic delivery of chemicals or drugs directly into the brain. A proof-of-concept experiment of single-synapse stimulation by two-photon uncaging of caged glutamate and observation of dendritic spine shrinkage over subsequent days demonstrated a promising use for the present technology.

Introduction

The availability of an experimental technique that can be used to investigate cell-cell communication in intact neural networks has provided a powerful key for understanding more about the brain. Recent advances in two-photon laser scanning microscopy (2PLSM) have enabled neural cells inside thick brain tissues to be observed with sub-cellular resolution1,2,3,4. An optical microscopic approach has several advantages over an electrophysiological approach, for example, 1) it is relatively less invasive, 2) spatial and temporal information can be simultaneously acquired, 3) neurons can be identified using a genetic approach, 4) optical techniques such as optogenetics or the uncaging of caged compounds can be applied.

Thus the analysis of neurons in the brain of a living animal by 2PLSM has been explored in an attempt to understand brain functions including higher functions such as learning and memory5,6. However, the in vivo imaging of neurons in living animals is not straightforward since the opacity of the skull bone usually prevents optical imaging. Even when the skull bone is surgically removed, the loss of brain fluids and bacterial infection at the exposed brain tissues are often critical problems. Therefore, in the last decade, extensive effort has been devoted to overcoming these technical issues and two surgical methods have been developed. One is the cranial-window method involving replacing the bone with a cover glass7,8,9,10 and the other is the thinned-skull method involving thinning the bone to the order of 10 μm11,12,13. Both methods can provide an optical path for microscopic imaging, prevent external infection and preserve the physiological conditions of the brain tissue. In particular, the thinned-skull method, which does not involve surgical dissection of skull bone, is less invasive.

Moreover, the combined use of the 2PSLM and photoresponsive compounds has been shown as an advanced approach for obtaining valuable insights into the dynamic activities of neurons14,15,16. Two-photon uncaging enables highly localized synapse stimulation, even at a single-spine level, via the photolytic release of caged neurotransmitters17,18,19. Noguchi et al. reported an extension of the two-photon uncaging in the study of neocortical pyramidal neurons of adult mice in vivo19. In their work, the chemical compounds were applied to the neocortex by partially covering the skull opening with a glass coverslip and by attaching a ring-shaped open chamber on the skull as a drug inlet reservoir. This method which is a modified version of the cranial window method was useful for in vivo two-photon uncaging, but can only be used for single-day experiment due to the inevitable risk of bacterial infection of the exposed brain.

In this paper, we propose a new experimental platform, called a “lab-on-a-brain”, formed by replacing a small part of the skull bone of a mouse with an implantable micro-optical fluidic device that enables both the long-term imaging of neurons in vivo and the delivery of chemicals into brain tissues. The drug delivery method mainly used in neuroscience is the cannula method, which is relatively invasive and sometimes obstructs microscopic observation. Thus, we attempted to achieve both optical observation and the delivery of various reagents with low tissue damage. The design, the fabrication process including sterilization and the method of installation of the implantable device are described in detail. To demonstrate the potential use of the implantable device, the time course of the formation and elimination of spines on the same dendrite was tracked in combination with 2PLSM for more than seven weeks. We also observed the spine shrinkage in vivo after two-photon uncaging stimulation for the first time. The spine shrinkage is considered as a structural correlate of the long-term depression of excitatory spine synapses20.

Results

Design and fabrication of the micro-optical fluidic device

Figures 1a and b show schematics of the implantable micro-optical fluidic device developed in this study. The device was designed to be implanted into a certain part of the skull bone to fill a drilled hole. The diameter of the imaging window was chosen to be 2.0 mm, which allows a focused and collected light beam to pass via a high-numerical-aperture (NA) objective lens of the 2PLSM system without any shielding or distortion of microscope images. To achieve high-resolution in vivo imaging, a small agarose gel disk was inserted in the gap between the imaging window and the brain surface to prevent pulsatile motion of the imaging site, which is caused by changes in blood pressure and by respiratory motion. Chemicals can be injected into the device via perfluorocarbon tubes and transported into the brain tissue by diffusion. Figure 1c shows the fabrication process of the implantable micro-optical fluidic device. As seen in the fourth assembly step, the device is mainly composed of three elements: a top glass disk, a bottom poly(dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) part having microstructures patterned by soft lithography and connection tubes for the chemical inlet and outlet. In addition, the device fabrication is followed by a sterilization step to prevent infection as described in the Methods section. Figure 1d shows the completed device. The main body was 2.7 mm in diameter and 450 μm in thickness. The device can deliver chemicals into the brain tissue at a rate of 10 μLmin−1 for 20 min (Supplementary Fig. S1a). In combination with numerical simulation, we can quantitatively predict and control the chemical concentration delivered into the imaged tissue region (Supplementary Figs. S1b and c, Supplementary Movie 1).

Figure 1
figure1

Design and fabrication process of the implantable micro-optical fluidic device.

(a) Schematic of a mouse implanted with the device. The exposed cortex can be observed through the device window. Chemicals can be introduced into the device via an inlet tube and removed via an outlet tube. (b) Schematic cross section of the mouse brain tissue and the implantable micro-optical fluidic device mounted on a mouse skull. Neurons in layers I–VI of the cerebral cortex of a mouse can be observed by 2PLSM. (c) Fabrication process of the implantable micro-optical fluidic device. (d) Photograph of the implantable microfluidic device. The main body of the device is 2.7 mm in diameter and 450 μm in thickness, to which two tubes for the inlet and outlet are connected. Scale bar, 5 mm. The schematic illustrations were drawn by H. T. using Adobe Illustrator software (CS6, Adobe Systems Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and the photograph was taken by H. T.

Device implantation on a mouse brain

The procedure of device implantation into the skull bone of a mouse is depicted in Fig. 2a. We named this low invasive surgery procedure “the systematic skull-dura removal (SSDR) method”, whose details are described in the Methods section. After device implantation, headgear for immobilizing a mouse head on a microscope stage was attached to the mouse and the mouse was housed in a standard cage, as shown in Fig. 2b. In the present study, the device was implanted over the primary visual cortex. The brain surface can be clearly observed through the imaging window of the device as shown in Fig. 2c.

Figure 2
figure2

Device implantation procedure and a mouse implanted with the device.

(a) Low invasive device implantation procedure with dura removal using enzymatic treatment. (b) Photograph of a living mouse with the headgear attached on its head. The micro-optical fluidic device was protected by placing it inside metal headgear with a detachable cover. (c) Close-up photograph of the implanted device after fixing it mechanically with dental cement. Scale bar, 2 mm. The schematic illustration was drawn by H. T. using Adobe Illustrator software and the photographs were taken by A. N.

From the assessment of expression levels of markers of injury/inflammation21, we confirmed that no recognizable damage or inflammation was induced in the brain of the mouse that underwent SSDR surgery (Supplementary Fig. S2).

Long-term observation of neurons in living mice by 2PLSM

Figure 3a shows a microscopy image of the brain tissue observed through the window of the implanted device. A high-resolution (<1 μm) microscopy image of neurons was successfully obtained by 2PLSM (see also Supplementary Movie 2). A spacer material with a suitable stiffness is important to suppress the motion of the brain surface without inducing the undesirable physical stimulation of inflammatory cells. Note that the high solute permeability of the gel is also a key property in delivering chemicals uniformly onto the brain surface. As a result, as shown in Fig. 3b, we could achieve long-term observation of the same neurons in the mouse brain by 2PLSM at intervals of several days for 53 days after the surgery. When bleeding from the dura mater and the inflammation of the brain were avoided, hardly any clouding on the imaging window was observed10. During the observation, no unnatural changes were observed in the shape of the dendrite. The turnover of synapse formation and elimination was comparable to that reported in a study using the thinned-skull method13, indicating the low invasiveness of the present method.

Figure 3
figure3

Long-term 2PLSM images of mouse primary visual cortex of a thy1 YFP-H line mouse implanted with the device.

(a) A low magnification image. Scale bar, 50 μm. (b) Time-lapse images of a dendrites of the cortex taken over 53 days. The same dendrite of a neuron was observed from the cortex of the mouse implanted with the device. Note that there are stable, newly formed and eliminated spines (indicated by white, yellow and magenta arrowheads, respectively). Scale bar, 5 μm. Representative data from 5 experiments.

Single-synapse stimulation by 2PUM

The implantable micro-optical fluidic device was applied to two-photon uncaging microscopy (2PUM) accompanied by the acute delivery of chemicals (Fig. 4a). As shown in Fig. 4b, two spine synapses on the same dendrite in the mouse brain were stimulated by uncaging MNI-glutamate at 2 Hz for 15 min, namely, the long-term depression (LTD) protocol was followed17,19. Figure 4b shows typical 2PSLM photographs of the dendrites before and after stimulation by glutamate uncaging. The changes in the spine head volume are plotted in Fig. 4c. The shrinkage of stimulated spine synapses occurred within 60 min and the elimination of the spines continued for two days after stimulation (Fig. 4b, spines indicated by arrows in the photoset of APV(−) and Fig. 4d). Importantly, we found that the shrinkage was induced even in the spines neighboring to stimulated ones within 60 min and two days later (Fig. 4d), as it was reported for brain slice preparations in vitro20,22.

Figure 4
figure4

Synapse stimulation by two-photon uncaging microscopy (2PUM).

(a) Reaction of photolytic release of MNI-glutamate. (b) 2PSLM photographs of the dendrite of a mouse before stimulation (−4 min) and 61 min and 2 days after uncaging. The photosets on the left- and right-hand sides show the results of APV(−) and APV(+) cases, respectively. Arrows indicate spine synapses stimulated by photo-uncaging. Stable, newly formed and eliminated spines are indicated by white, yellow and magenta numbers, respectively. Scale bar, 2 μm. (c) Time course of spine-head volume of the stimulated synapse. The plotted values correspond to the spines indicated by yellow circles in Fig. 4b. Stimulated spine synapses (APV(−)) showed apparent shrinkage within 1 h and their termination was confirmed by the observation 2 days after the stimulation. In contrast, a synapse stimulated in the presence of receptor antagonist (APV) did not show any shrinkage. (d) Average volume of spines subjected to the LTD protocol (17 spines, 4 dendrites, 4 mice), their neighbors within 3 μm (7 spines, 4 dendrites, 4 mice) and the spines subjected to the LTD protocol in the presence of APV (6 spines, 2 dendrites, 2 mice) evaluated 2 days after the stimulation experiment by photo-uncaging. Error bars, s.e.m.; *P < 0.05 by Steel's test; APV (−) stimulated and APV (−) neighbors versus APV(+) stimulated.

In contrast, no shrinkage of spine synapses was observed in the presence of NMDA receptor antagonist APV, which was used in a control experiment to verify the phototoxicity of laser irradiation (Fig. 4b, spines indicated with arrows in the photoset of APV (+) and Fig. 4d). Thus, the shrinkage of spines by photo-uncaging stimulation has been observed in vivo over 2 days for the first time. It is noteworthy that, unlike our device approach, conventional open-skull surgeries do not allow chronic focal application of chemicals and cannot study long-term effects.

Discussion

Microfluidic devices have already shown great potential for biological and medical studies in vitro23,24,25,26,27,28. The present study aimed to further extend the potential use of microfluidic technology to provide a revolutionary interface device for in vivo cellular research. The highest priority issue of the implant device is to minimize pain and distress to animals used for research. We need to pay careful attention not to induce immunological rejection due to the device implantation. The original purpose of in vivo imaging cannot be achieved when an immunological response disturbs the physiological state of cells under observation. In this study, we specifically developed our device for experimental studies using living mice. There are many reasons for using experimental mice in addition to their small size and ease of breeding29. The small size of the mouse brain makes it suitable for in vivo imaging of neurons since whole layers of the neocortex can be observed using 2PLSM. Moreover, various genetically engineered mice are now available for biological and medical research30,31,32,33,34. To reduce the pain and distress to mice, a technical challenge is to make the device as small as possible. In the previous literature, a pial window crown of 10 mm diameter for use in rats was reported35 and a glass window of 32 mm diameter was also reported for use in monkeys36. In contrast, the cranial window sizes for mice are limited to 2–4 mm in diameter10. Hence the introduction of microdevice technology is necessary to fulfill the requirements for downsizing without degrading functionality for optical observation and chemical delivery.

Next, we discuss the impact of long-term observation of the mouse brain in vivo. So far, there has been no means of performing long-term observation of a neuron or dendrite of a portion controlling the brain environment using a reagent since inserting cannula causes considerable injury of the tissue. Recently, controlling the flow of cerebrospinal fluid has been found to be important for the normal activity of the central nervous system and its failure may be a cause of various diseases including Alzheimer's disease37. Using our method, the brain environment can be readily modified with less brain damage.

Moreover, higher brain functions such as learning and memory are phenomena involving relatively long periods of time ranging from several days to a few months. Also, the long-term sequential analysis of neural cells and biochemical molecules is required to clarify the mechanisms and to develop therapeutic methods for intractable brain diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and Fragile X syndrome38,39. Our implantable micro-optical fluidic device is expected to open a door to such less-explored but important biological and medical research targets.

In summary, an implantable micro-optical fluidic device was developed, which enables both the long-term microscopic observation of neurons in a mouse brain and the delivery of chemicals into the brain tissue. The surgical scheme that was systematically developed for low invasive installation of the device enabled the physiological condition of the intact brain to be essentially preserved. Consequently, the long-term tracking of the same dendritic spines by 2PLSM over a period of weeks has become possible. Moreover, a proof-of-concept experiment involving 2PUM for single-synapse stimulation in a living brain was conducted as an example of an application of the present technique. The experimental “lab-on-a-brain” platform using an implantable micro-optical fluidic device is expected to contribute to the advancement of neuroscience and neurological medicine.

Methods

All experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Experiment Committee of School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo and all care of animals and experimental procedures were carried out in accordance with the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Department of Medicine, the University of Tokyo.

Device fabrication

The top glass disk of the device was fused silica glass (Sendai Sekiei Ltd., Sendai, Japan) of 2.7 mm diameter and 150 μm thickness. The bottom PDMS part was prepared by soft lithography40. To form a microchannel mold, a 225-μm-thick dry film photoresist (TMMF 2045, Tokyo Ohka Kogyo Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was laminated onto a glass substrate, exposed to UV light through a chrome photomask and developed. A PDMS prepolymer (Sylgard 184, Dow Corning Co., MI, USA) was cured at 85°C for 120 min on the microchannel mold and the slab of PDMS of 315 μm thickness was peeled off from the mold. Then, the PDMS sheet including microchannels of 200 μm width and 225 μm height was cut into a ring shape of 2.0 mm inner diameter and 2.7 mm outer diameter. Then, the PDMS ring and the top glass disk were bonded together by heating at 235°C for 150 min. Finally, two perfluorocarbon tubes of 200 μm outer diameter were connected to the PDMS ring to form the inlet and outlet of chemicals. After completing the fabrication process, the device was placed in a sterilization pouch (Fisher Scientific, PA, USA) and sterilized in a steam autoclave operated on a liquid cycle at 2 atm, 121°C for 20 min.

Surgical implantation

Implantation experiments using the SSDR method were performed as follows. The surgical procedure was performed carefully to avoid inflammatory reaction of the brain tissue. An adult mouse expressing GFP or YFP in a subset of neurons (Thy1 GFP-M or YFP-H line, >8 weeks old) was initially anesthetized by injecting a combination of ketamine and xylazine (Rompun, Bayer Health Care, Leverkusen, Germany). The headgear used for immobilizing a mouse on a microscope was attached to the mouse head. A 2.7-mm-diameter hole was carefully drilled into the skull exactly over the primary visual cortex (3.0 mm posterior, 2.5 mm lateral to bregma) using a dental drill. After the removal of the skull bone, the exposed dura mater was washed with artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) (125 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 1.25 mM NaH2PO4, 26 mM NaHCO3, 20 mM glucose, 2 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2, sterilized by filtration) including antibiotics (2 mg/mL chloramphenicol, 2500 U/mL polymyxin B sulfate and 0.25 mg/mL dexamethasone in ACSF)36. Then, the dura mater was treated with collagenase (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Osaka, Japan) that was immobilized on Sepharose beads (CNBr-activated sepharose 4B, GE Healthcare, U.K.). This enzymatic treatment facilitates the removal of the dura mater without damaging blood vessels, which can be digested by the enzyme. An agarose gel disk of 1.2 mm diameter and 300 μm thickness, which was sterilized by filtration during preparation, was placed under the device to suppress the pulsatile motion of the brain surface. Finally, the device filled with ACSF was placed in the skull hole and fixed using a resin-modified glass–ionomer cement (Fuji Lute BC, GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). After the operation, the mouse was housed in a standard cage with an auxiliary metal cover on the headgear to protect the implanted device.

In vivo two-photon imaging

The mouse was anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine, immobilized under the objective lens of a microscope while wearing the headgear and brain stereotaxis apparatus (SR-5M, Narishige Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and warmed to 37°C using a heating pad (FST-HPS, Fine Science Tools Inc., North Vancouver, Canada). In vivo imaging was performed using an upright microscope (BX61WI, FV1000, Olympus Co., Tokyo, Japan) equipped with Ti-sapphire lasers (Mai-Tai, Spectra Physics Inc., CA, USA). The laser was set at 950 nm for imaging YFP. A water-immersion objective lens (LUMPlanFI/IR NA 0.9 60×, Olympus) was used to observe neurons in the brain.

In vivo two-photon uncaging microscopy

A GFP-M line mouse with the device installed was anesthetized and immobilized onto a microscope. 20 mM of 4-methoxy-7-nitroindolinyl (MNI)-glutamate41 was flowed into the channel at a rate of 10 μL min−1 using a syringe pump and delivered into the brain tissue for ~30 min before uncaging and washed off with ACSF at a rate of 10 μL min−1 for ~10 min after the imaging session. Single spine synapses were stimulated by uncaging MNI-glutamate using a 720-nm-wavelength pulse laser. Repeated stimulation was performed by 2 Hz for 15 min, namely, the long-term depression (LTD) protocol was followed17,19. As a control, the stimulation was also performed in the presence of 50 μM D-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (D-APV), which is the N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) receptor antagonist. Spine head volumes were estimated from the total fluorescence intensity by summing the fluorescence values of stacked images of three-dimensional data, as previously reported17,19.

References

  1. Denk, W., Strickler, J. H. & Webb, W. W. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science 248, 73–76 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zipfel, W. R., Williams, R. M. & Webb, W. W. Nonlinear magic: multiphoton microscopy in the biosciences. Nat. Biotechnol. 21, 1369–1377 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Helmchen, F. & Denk, W. Deep tissue two-photon microscopy. Nat. Methods 2, 932–940 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pittet, M. J. & Weissleder, R. Intravital imaging. Cell 147, 983–991 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kerr, J. N. & Denk, W. Imaging in vivo: watching the brain in action. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 195–205 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Holtmaat, A. & Svoboda, K. Experience-dependent structural synaptic plasticity in the mammalian brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 647–658 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Trachtenberg, J. T. et al. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex. Nature 420, 788–794 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holtmaat, A. J. G. D. et al. Transient and persistent dendritic spines in the neocortex in vivo. Neuron 45, 279–292 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mostany, R. & Portera-Cailliau, C. A craniotomy surgery procedure for chronic brain imaging. J. Vis. Exp. 12, e680 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holtmaat, A. et al. Long-term, high-resolution imaging in the mouse neocortex through a chronic cranial window. Nat. Protoc. 4, 1128–1144 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grutzendler, J., Kasthuri, N. & Gan, W. B. Long-term dendritic spine stability in the adult cortex. Nature 420, 812–816 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Xu, H. T., Pan, F., Yang, G. & Gan, W. B. Choice of cranial window type for in vivo imaging affects dendritic spine turnover in the cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 10, 549–551 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, G., Pan, F., Parkhurst, C. N., Grutzendler, J. & Gan, W. B. Thinned-skull cranial window technique for long-term imaging of the cortex in live mice. Nat. Protoc. 5, 201–208 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stosiek, C., Garaschuk, O., Holthoff, K. & Konnerth, A. In vivo two-photon calcium imaging of neuronal networks. PNAS 100, 7319–7324 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ohki, K., Chung, S., Ch'ng, Y. H., Kara, P. & Reid, R. C. Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex. Nature 433, 597–603 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grewe, B. F., Langer, D., Kasper, H., Kampa, B. M. & Helmchen, F. High-speed in vivo calcium imaging reveals neuronal network activity with near-millisecond precision. Nat. Methods. 7, 399–405 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Matsuzaki, M. et al. Dendritic spine geometry is critical for AMPA receptor expression in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 1086–1092 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsuzaki, M., Honkura, N., Ellis-Davies, G. C. R. & Kasai, H. Structural basis of long-term potentiation in single dendritic spines. Nature 429, 761–766 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Noguchi, J. et al. In vivo two-photon uncaging of glutamate revealing the structure–function relationships of dendritic spines in the neocortex of adult mice. J. Physiol. 589, 2447–2457 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hayama, T. et al. GABA promotes the competitive selection of dendritic spines by controlling local Ca2+ signaling. Nat. Neurosci. 16, 1409–1416 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Graeber, M. B. et al. The microglia/macrophage response in the neonatal rat facial nucleus following axotomy. Brain Res. 813, 241–253 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiegert, J. S. & Oertner, T. G. Long-term depression triggers the selective elimination of weakly integrated synapses. PNAS 110, E4510–E4519 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Huang, Y., Williams, J. C. & Johnson, S. M. Brain slice on a chip: opportunities and challenges of applying microfluidic technology to intact tissues. Lab Chip 12, 2103–2117 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Manz, A. et al. Micromachining of monocrystalline silicon and glass for chemical analysis systems A look into next century's technology or just a fashionable craze? Trends Anal. Chem. 10, 144–149 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Oki, A. et al. Development of healthcare chips checking life-style-related diseases. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 24, 837–843 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitesides, G. M. The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442, 368–373 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Akagi, T. & Ichiki, T. Cell electrophoresis on a chip: what can we know from the changes in electrophoretic mobility? Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 391, 2433–2441 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huh, D., Hamilton, G. A. & Ingber, D. E. From 3D cell culture to organs-on-chips. Trends Cell Biol. 21, 745–754 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoshiki, A. et al. The mouse resources at the RIKEN BioResource center. Exp. Anim. 58, 85–96 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hasan, M. T. et al. Functional fluorescent Ca2+ indicator proteins in transgenic mice under TET control. PLoS Biol. 2, e163 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, F., Aravanis, A. M., Adamantidis, A., de Lecea, L. & Deisseroth, K. Circuit-breakers: optical technologies for probing neural signals and systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 577–581 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Takao, K., Yamasaki, N. & Miyakawa, T. Impact of brain-behavior phenotypying of genetically-engineered mice on research of neuropsychiatric disorders. Neurosci. Res. 58, 124–132 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wallace, D. J. et al. Single-spike detection in vitro and in vivo with a genetic Ca2+ sensor. Nat. Methods 5, 797–804 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mank, M. et al. A genetically encoded calcium indicator for chronic in vivo two-photon imaging. Nat. Methods 5, 805–811 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jallo, J. et al. A chronic model to simultaneously measure intracranial pressure, cerebral blood flow and study the pial microvasculature. J. Neurosci. Meth. 75, 155–160 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Arieli, A., Grinvald, A. & Slovin, H. Dural substitute for long-term imaging of cortical activity in behaving monkeys and its clinical implications. J. Neurosci. Meth. 114, 119–133 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xie, L. et al. Sleep drives metabolite clearance from the adult brain. Science 342, 373–377 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Irwin, S. A., Galvez, R. & Greenough, W. T. Dendritic spine structural anomalies in fragile-X mental retardation syndrome. Cereb. Cortex 10, 1038–1044 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Jucker, M. & Walker, L. C. Self-propagation of pathogenic protein aggregates in neurodegenerative diseases. Nature 501, 45–51 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Xia, Y. & Whitesides, G. M. Soft lithography. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 28, 153–184 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kramer, R. H., Chambers, J. J. & Trauner, D. Photochemical tools for remote control of ion channels in excitable cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 1, 360–365 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Fellows (22-8063 to HT), for Scientific Research (C) (22510124 to TI) and for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas (26430005, 26111706 to JN) and Specially Promoted Area (21000009 to HK) and the Center for NanoBio Integration (Research and Development in a New Converting Field Based on Nanotechnology and Materials Science) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan. In addition, this work was supported by Research Grant from the Human Frontier Science Program to H.K.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

H.T. designed and conducted experiments, analyzed data and wrote the paper. A.N. designed and conducted experiments and analyzed data. J.N. and T.A. contributed to discussions. H.K. and T.I. contributed to discussions and supervised the project. All authors contributed to the editing of the paper.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary movie 1

Supplementary Information

Supplementary movie 2

Rights and permissions

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takehara, H., Nagaoka, A., Noguchi, J. et al. Lab-on-a-brain: Implantable micro-optical fluidic devices for neural cell analysis in vivo. Sci Rep 4, 6721 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06721

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing