Abstract
The Shastry-Sutherland lattice, one of the simplest systems with geometrical frustration, which has an exact eigenstate by putting singlets on diagonal bonds, can be realized in a group of layered compounds and raises both theoretical and experimental interest. Most of the previous studies on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice are focusing on the Heisenberg model. Here we opt for the Hubbard model to calculate phase diagrams over a wide range of interaction parameters and show the competing effects of interaction, frustration and temperature. At low temperature, frustration is shown to favor a paramagnetic metallic ground state, while interaction drives the system to an antiferromagnetic insulator phase. Between these two phases, there are an antiferromagnetic metal phase and a paramagnetic insulator phase (which should consist of a small plaquette phase and a dimer phase) resulting from the competition of the frustration and the interaction. Our results may shed light on more exhaustive studies about quantum phase transitions in geometrically frustrated systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The strongly correlated system with geometrical frustration is an important research area in condensed matter physics and has attracted enormous interests in recent years. Geometric frustration refers to the case where the geometry of a lattice conflicts with its inter-site interactions. It can be realized in antiferromagnetic Heisenberg models on certain lattices, such as triangular lattice1 and kagome lattice2, which host competing exchange interactions that can not be satisfied simultaneously. This can give rise to new possibilities for the ground state, including the usual antiferromagnetic order and many novel states, such as heavy Fermi liquid, spin liquid, spin glass and spin ice, which are poorly understood and thus actively studied3,4,5,6,7.
The Shastry-Sutherland lattice is one of geometrically frustrated systems and has been actively studied due to the magnetization plateaus in the presence of a magnetic field8,9,10,11,12,13,14 and its observation15,16,17,18,19,20. It was first proposed by Shastry and Sutherland21 as a theoretical toy model with the Heisenberg Hamiltonian where there are exchange interactions on the nearest bond as well as the diagonal bonds (see in Fig. 1 (b)). It is shown to have an exact eigenstate consisting of orthogonal singlet dimers on the diagonal bonds, which becomes the exact ground state of the system when frustration is strong. It is later found out that the Shastry-Sutherland lattice can be used to describe the magnetic properties of the compound SrCu2(BO3)28,22,23, in which the two dimensional magnetic linkage of the Cu2+ ions has a structure shown in Fig. 1 (a) and is topologically equivalent to Shastry-Sutherland lattice. Similar structures have also been found in other materials, such as Y b2Pt2Pb24 and RB4(R = La − Lu)25. Most of the theoretical and numerical studies on Shastry-Sutherland lattice so far have been focusing on Heisenberg model9,26,27,28, Ising model25, t − J model29,30 and t − J − V model31. However, there are few works about the Hubbard model and they are all mainly considering the possibility of superconductivity in a system doped away from half-filling32. In this report, we opt for the Hubbard model to investigate correlated electrons on this geometrically frustrated system, which reduces to the Heisenberg model in the large U limit at half-filling. Our study based on Hubbard model thus can provide phase diagrams that include a wider range of interaction parameters.
To understand this strongly correlated many-body system with geometrical frustration, we apply the cellular dynamical mean field theory (CDMFT) combined with the continuous time quantum Monte Carlo method (CTQMC). The CDMFT, which incorporates the short-range spatial correlations by mapping the lattice to a self-consistent embedded cluster in real space instead of a single site in dynamical mean field theory (DMFT)33, has been proved to be successful when applied to study strongly interacting systems with geometrical frustration34,35,36. The CTQMC, on the other hand, which is more accurate than the traditional quantum Monte Carlo method, is used as an impurity solver37,38. From the single-particle Green's function given by the CDMFT and CTQMC, the single-particle density of states and the double occupancy can be calculated, which are further used to identify the Mott metal-insulator transition. Due to the presence of frustration, magnetic order is another important aspect that we would like to address in this report, which can also be extracted from the single-particle Green's function. Then we obtain phase diagrams including the effect of interaction, frustration and temperature. At low temperature, apart from the antiferromagnetic insulator and paramagnetic metal phase that usually appear in a Mott transition, the competition between frustration and interaction gives rise to two other phases. One is an antiferromagnetic metal phase in the intermediate interaction region before the onset of the metal-insulator transition. The other one is a paramagnetic insulator phase at both large interactions and large frustrations and this non-magnetic insulator phase should consist of a small plaquette phase and a dimer phase.
Results
The standard Hubbard model on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice can be written as
where is the creation (annihilation) operator; is the number operator; t1 (t2) is the nearest-neighbor (the diagonal) hopping energy as shown in Fig. 1(b). U is the Hubbard interaction strength. 〈ij〉1 (〈ij〉2) runs over the nearest-neighbor links (the diagonal links) on the lattice. We set t1 = 1.0 as the energy unit and t2 hence can be seen as a measure of the frustration strength. We focus on the half-filling case i.e. 〈n〉 = 1, which is realized by adjusting the chemical potential μ.
We shall start from the non-interacting case with U = 0. In this case, the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) can be partially diagonalized in momentum space as , where . The index i = 1, 2, 3, 4 in cik represent the four sites in each unit cell as illustrated in Fig. 1 (b) and k locates in the first Brillouin zone. t(k) is a 4 × 4 matrix that has a form,
The band dispersion is readily obtained by diagonalizing this matrix. A special case with t2 = 1.0 is shown in Fig. 1 (d), where there are four bands resulting from the four sub-lattices. We label them I II III and IV from top to bottom, among which band II and III touch at Γ point (k = (0, 0)). Band II has its minimum at Γ and two diagonals in the first Brillouin zone, which result in a Van Hove singularity right at half filling in the density of states as shown in Fig. 1(e). In addition, we show in Fig. 2 the evolution of the band dispersions along the high symmetry lines of the first Brillouin zone with respect to t2. It can be seen that there are several things in common for the dispersions at different t2's. For example, the band is a flat along the diagonal of the first Brillouin zone. Along the boundary of the first Brillouin zone, band I and II as well as band III and IV are degenerate. Besides, when t2 > 2.0, there is a gap opened between band II and III and the system becomes a band insulator at half-filling. As we are focusing on the Mott transition, we limit our studies to the case when t2 < 2.0 in this report.
Now we turn to the case when the Hubbard interaction is present (i.e. U > 0). A large U can induce a large energy cost when two electrons occupy the same site, leading to a decreasing double occupancy. Consequently, at half filling electrons tends to get localized with one electron per site and when U is large enough the system becomes an insulator with gap in the single-particle electron spectrum, known as the Mott metal-insulator transition. In order to identify the Mott transition of the Shastry-Sutherland lattice, we calculated the density of states (DOS) at different interaction strength by the maximum entropy method39 with different temperature and frustration. In Fig. 3(a), we show the DOS for T = 0.2, t2 = 1.0. It can be seen that when U = 7 a Fermi-liquid-like peak is found near Fermi energy, which splits to a pseudogap when U is increased to 8.540,41. When U increases up to the critical point U = 9.5 an obvious gap appears around the Fermi level which suggests the system undergoes a Mott transition from a metal to a Mott insulator. In Fig. 3(b) we plot the DOS at T = 0.1 with t2 = 1.0 and we can see that the transition point at T = 0.1 decreases to U = 8 compared with U = 9.5 when T = 0.2, which is because the decreasing of temperature suppresses the thermal fluctuations and makes the Mott transition easier. By comparing Figs. 3(b)–(d), it is found out that the critical interaction of Mott transition increases when the frustration becomes stronger.
The double occupancy Docc = 〈ni↑ni↓〉 represents the probability of two particles occupying the same site. The evolution of Docc as a function of U at different temperature is shown in Fig. 4. It can be seen that as U increases, Docc decreases monotonically to a small value, which is a characteristic feature of the Mott transition2, indicating that the system is almost singly occupied at large U. Meanwhile, Docc has no visible discontinuities at the critical points marked with arrows, suggesting that the Mott transition here is continuous. We also observe a natural decrease of the critical U when the temperature decreases, which suppresses the thermal fluctuations. Besides, the evolution of Docc as a function of the frustration strength for different U is shown in the inset of Fig. 4 and it can be seen that the double occupancy is increased with increasing t2 or decreasing U.
There is usually magnetic order developed along with the Mott metal-insulator transition. In order to investigate the formation of the magnetic order, we define a staggered magnetic order parameter as , where sign(i) = 1 if i = 1, 3 and sign(i) = −1 if i = 2, 4 as shown in Fig. 1(b). Fig. 5 shows the evolution of this staggered magnetic order parameter m and the single-particle gap ΔE as a function of U for T = 0.1, with t2 = 1.0. When U = 6 both the staggered magnetic order parameter and the single-particle gap vanish and the system is in a paramagnetic metal phase. When 6 < U < 8, the magnetic order forms while the single-particle excitation is still gapless, implying the system is in an antiferromagnetic metal phase. When U increases to 8, a gap opens and the system goes into an antiferromagnetic insulator phase. In the inset of Fig. 5, we also show the case when t2 = 1.4. There only exists the metal-insulator transition at U = 10 and all magnetic orders are suppressed due to strong frustration.
Carrying out the analysis above in a wide range of parameters, phase diagrams of interacting fermions on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice with respect to interaction, frustration and temperature are obtained in Figs. 6 and 7. We first show the effect of frustration t2 and interaction U at a low enough temperature T = 0.1 (see Fig. 6). When t2 = 0, the Shastry-Sutherland Lattice degenerates to a square lattice, which is unstable towards an antiferromagnetic phase for an arbitrarily small interaction due to the perfect nesting of the Fermi surface and the magnetic order is always accompanied by a Mott insulating gap36,42. In Fig. 6, the finite critical U which is around 2.9 when t2 = 0 is due to the finite temperature. In the presence of frustration, when U increases, instead of going directly into the antiferromagnetic insulator phase from the paramagnetic metal phase, the system first enters an antiferromagnetic metal phase, showing an important role that frustration plays in the formation of an antiferromagnetic metal43,44,45. When t2 > 1.3 the antiferromagnetic metal phase disappear and a paramagnetic insulator phase emerges for U > 9.5. The critical frustration t2 = 1.3 obtained here is consistent with the one obtained from the calculations of the two dimensional Heisenberg model on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice, beyond which the system was shown to consist of a small plaquette phase and a dimer phase26,46,47,48,49. We will return to this later in more details in the discussion part.
We also obtain phase diagrams showing the effects of thermal fluctuations at a fixed frustration strength t2 = 1.0, as illustrated in Fig. 7. The antiferromagnetic metal phase exists when T < 0.175 and a phase transition from antiferromagnetic metal to antiferromagnetic insulator is found when U is kept increasing. When temperature is high, magnetic orders are suppressed by thermal fluctuations and the system undergoes a transition from a paramagnetic metal phase to a paramagnetic insulator phase with increasing interaction. Additionally, we plot the phase digram with frustration up to 1.3 in the inset of Fig. 7. It is shown that due to the strong frustration, magnetic orders are totally suppressed even at low temperature; both the antiferromagnetic metal phase and the antiferromagnetic insulator phase disappears. When the interaction is increased, there is only a transition from a paramagnetic metal to a paramagnetic insulator.
Finally, we present in Fig. 8 the distribution of the spectral weight at zero frequency, for different U and t2 with T = 0.1. The location of the maxima of A(k, ω = 0) can be seen as the Fermi surface1. As showed in Fig. 8, when the interaction is small, the spectral function has sharp peaks at the center and along the two intersecting diagonals of the first Brillouin zone, which is weakly renormalized compared to the non-interaction case and exhibits a well-defined Fermi surface. With the increasing of the interaction, the peaks become lower and finally vanish when the Mott transition happens due to the localization of particles. The decreasing of the frustration also makes the Fermi surface shrink.
Discussion
As mentioned in the introduction part, most of the theoretical and numerical studies of Shastry-Sutherland lattice are focusing on localized spins based on the Heisenberg model, whose ground state phase diagram has two limiting behavior depending on the dimensionless parameter J/J′, where J is the exchange coupling constant along the nearest neighbour bonds and J′ the one along the additional diagonal bonds. In the limit , the ground state is an antiferromagnet with gapless magnetic excitations, while in the opposite limit , the exact ground state is proved to be a non-magnetic insulator where local spins form singlet dimers (see Fig. 6 (a3)) on the diagonal bonds. Between these two phases, a small window of an intermediate phase was also found50,51, which has been confirmed as a plaquette phase26,46,47,48,49.
In this report, we numerically investigate the Hubbard model on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice which takes the itinerancy of electrons into account. When U is large and overwhelms the effect of the kinetic energy, electrons get localized and the system reduces to the extensively studied antiferromagnetic Heisenberg model, which can thus serve as a benchmark of our calculations. As shown in Fig. 6, at large U limit, spins order antiferromagnetically when frustration (t2/t1) is small. When frustration goes large, magnetic orders are suppressed and the system becomes a non-magnetic (paramagnetic) insulator consistent with previous results for the Heisenberg model. The critical point in our calculation is around t2/t1 = 1.3, which, at large U limit, corresponds to J/J′ = (t1/t2)2 ≈ 0.6 for the Heisenberg model. This is close to previous results9,23,52,53,54, where the critical J/J′ between the Néel phase anf the non-magnetic phase is predicted to be around 0.7. According the the previous studies on Heisenberg model, this non-magnetic phase should consist of a small plaquette phase and a dimer phase26,46,47,48,49. In the intermediate coupling regime where the itinerancy of electrons need to be taken into account, there is an antiferromagnetic metal phase sandwiched by the paramagnetic metal phase and the antiferromagnetic insulator phase, due to the competition of the frustration and the interaction. Similar phenomenons have also been discussed for the Hubbard model on the frustrated triangular lattice55,56,57,58,59,60, where there are also intermediate phases between the usual antiferromagnetic insulator phase and paramagnetic metal phase, due to the geometrically frustrated lattice structure, such as a non-magnetic insulating phase, a superconducting phase and an insulating spin liquid phase.
In summary, by combining the cellular dynamical mean field theory with the continuous time quantum Monte Carlo method, we investigate the Hubbard model on Shastry-Sutherland lattice at half filling and obtain phase diagrams with respect to interaction, frustration and temperature. Our result shows that in the present of frustration an antiferromagnetic metal phase exists at low temperature between the paramagnetic metal phase and the antiferromagnetic insulator phase. When frustration goes beyond a critical value, magnetic orders are suppressed and Mott transition leads the system to a paramagnetic insulator, which should consist of a small plaquette phase and a dimer phase according to previous studies on Heisenberg model on Shastry-Sutherland lattice. We hope our study can provide a new perspective for the property of this lattice.
Methods
All calculations reported in this work are carried out by using the cellular dynamical mean field theory (CDMFT)34,35,36 and the continuous time quantum Monte Carlo method (CTQMC)37,38. In our work we map the original lattice onto a four-site effective cluster (see Fig. 1 (b)) embedded in a self-consistent medium. From an initialization of the self-energy Σ(iω), the effective medium g(iω) can be obtained via the coarse-grained Dyson equation,
where μ is the chemical potential and t(k) is the Fourier-transformed hopping matrix and k is summed over the reduced Brillouin zone.
After getting t(k), we can obtain the cluster Green's function G(iω) by simulating the effective cluster model using CTQMC as the impurity solver. Using Dyson function Σ = g−1(iω) − G−1(iω) we renew the cluster self-energy Σ(iω) and complete the iteration. Here, g(iω), t(k), G(iω), Σ(iω) are all 4 × 4 matrices. We repeat this self-consistent iterative loop until the results are converged and in each iteration we take 107 Monte Carlo steps. The self-energy after 20 iterations is accurate to two decimal places for weak or intermediate interaction and one decimal place for strong interaction.
References
Parcollet, O., Biroli, G. & Kotliar, G. Cluster dynamical mean field analysis of the Mott transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 226402 (2004).
Ohashi, T., Kawakami, N. & Tsunetsugu, H. Mott transition in kagome lattice Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 066401 (2006).
Kondo, S., Johnston, D. C. et al. LiV2O4: A heavy Fermion transition metal oxide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3729 (1997).
Shimizu, Y., Miyagawa, K., Kanoda, K., Maesato, M. & Saito, G. Spin liquid state in an organic Mott insulator with a triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 107001 (2003).
Binder, K. & Young, A. P. Spin glasses: Experimental facts, theoretical concepts and open questions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 801 (1986).
Nisoli, C., Moessner, R. & Schiffer, P. Colloquium: Artificial spin ice: Designing and imaging magnetic frustration. Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1473–1490 (2013).
Shannon, N., Sikora, O., Pollmann, F., Penc, K. & Fulde, P. Quantum ice: q quantum Monte Carlo study. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 067204 (2012).
Kageyama, H. et al. Exact dimer ground state and quantized magnetization plateaus in the two-dimensional spin system SrCu2(BO3)2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3168 (1999).
Miyahara, S. & Ueda, K. Exact dimer ground state of the two dimensional Heisenberg spin system SrCu2(BO3)2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3701 (1999).
Momoi, T. & Totsuka, K. Magnetization plateaus of the Shastry-Sutherland model for SrCu2(BO3)2: Spin-density wave, supersolid and bound states. Phys. Rev. B. 62, 15067 (2000).
Miyahara, S., Becca, F. & Mila, F. Theory of spin-density profile and lattice distortion in the magnetization plateaus of SrCu2(BO3)2 . Phys. Rev. B. 68, 024401 (2003).
Dorier, J., Schmidt, K. P. & Mila, F. Theory of magnetization plateaux in the Shastry-Sutherland model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 250402 (2008).
Lou, J., Suzuki, T., Harada, K. & Kawashima, N. Study of the Shastry Sutherland model using multi-scale entanglement renormalization ansatz. arXiv: 1212. 1999 (2012).
Corboz, P. & Mila, F. Crystals of bound states in the magnetization plateaus of the Shastry-Sutherland model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 147203 (2014).
Onizuka, K. et al. 1/3 Magnetization plateau in SrCu2(BO3)2 - Stripe order of excited triplets. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 69, 1016 (2000).
Kodama, K., Takigawa, M., Horvatić, M., Berthier, C., Kageyama, H., Ueda, Y., Miyahara, S., Becca, F. & Mila, F. Magnetic superstructure in the two-dimensional quantum antiferromagnet SrCu2(BO3)2 . Sicence 298, 395 (2002).
Sebastian, S. E. et al. Fractalization drives crystalline states in a frustrated spin system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 20157 (2008).
Jaime, M. et al. Magnetostriction and magnetic texture to 100.75 Tesla in frustrated SrCu2(BO3)2 . Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 12404 (2012).
Takigawa, M. et al. Incomplete Devils staircase in the magnetization curve of SrCu2(BO3)2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 067210 (2013).
Matsuda, Y. H. et al. Magnetization of SrCu2(BO3)2 in Ultrahigh Magnetic Fields up to 118 T. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 137204 (2013).
Shastry, B. S. & Sutherland, B. Exact ground state of a quantum mechanical antiferromagnet. Physica B+C 108, 1069 (1981).
Smith, R. W. & Keszler, D. A. Synthesis, structure and properties of the orthoborate SrCu2(BO3)2 . Journal of Solid State Chemistry 93, 430 (1991).
Miyahara, S. & Ueda, K. Theory of the orthogonal dimer Heisenberg spin model for SrCu2(BO3)2 . Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 15, R327 (2003).
Kim, M. S. & Aronson, M. C. Spin liquids and antiferromagnetic order in the Shastry-Sutherland-Lattice compound Y b2Pt2Pb. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 017201 (2013).
Dublenych, Y. I. Ground states of the Ising model on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice and the origin of the fractional magnetization plateaus in rare-earth-metal tetraborides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 167202 (2012).
Koga, A. & Kawakami, N. Quantum phase transitions in the Shastry-Sutherland model for SrCu2(BO3)2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 4461 (2000).
Grechnev, A. Exact ground state of the Shastry-Sutherland lattice with classical Heisenberg spins. Phys. Rev. B 87, 144419 (2013).
Müller-Hartmann, E., Singh, R. R. P., Knetter, C. & Uhrig, G. S. Exact demonstration of magnetization plateaus and first-order dimer-neel phase transitions in a modified Shastry-Sutherland model for SrCu2(BO3)2 . Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1808 (2000).
Chung, C.-H. & Kim, Y. B. Competing orders and superconductivity in the doped Mott insulator on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207004 (2004).
Leung, P. W. & Cheng, Y. F. Absence of hole pairing in a simple tJ model on the Shastry-Sutherland Sutherland lattice. Phys. Rev. B. 69, 180403(R) (2004).
Yang, B.-J., Kim, Y. B., Yu, J. & Park, K. Doped valence-bond solid and superconductivity on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice. Phys. Rev. B. 77, 104507 (2008).
Kimura, T., Kuroki, K., Arita, R. & Aoki, H. Possibility of superconductivity in the repulsive Hubbard model on the Shastry-Sutherland lattice. Phys. Rev. B. 69, 054501 (2004).
Georges, A., Kotliar, G., Krauth, W. & Rozenberg, M. J. Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions. Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 13 (1996).
Kotliar, G., Savrasov, S. Y., Plsson, G. & Biroli, G. Cellular dynamical mean field approach to strongly correlated systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 186401 (2001).
Park, H., Haule, K. & Kotliar, G. Cluster Dynamical Mean Field Theory of the Mott Transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 186403 (2008).
Maier, T., Jarrell, M., Pruschke, T. & Hettler, M. H. Quantum cluster theories. Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1027 (2005).
Rubtsov, A. N., Savkin, V. V. & Lichtenstein, A. I. Continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo method for fermions. Phys. Rev. B 72, 035122 (2005).
Gull, E. et al. Continuous-time Monte Carlo methods for quantum impurity models. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 349 (2011).
Jarrell, M. & Gubernatis, J. E. Bayesian inference and the analytic continuation of imaginary-time quantum Monte Carlo data. Physics Reports 269, 133 (1996).
Huscroft, C., Jarrell, M., Maier, T., Moukouri, S. & Tahvildarzadeh, A. N. Pseudogaps in the 2D Hubbard Model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 139 (2001).
Imai, Y. & Kawakami, N. Spectral functions in itinerant electron systems with geometrical frustration. Phys. Rev. B 65, 233103 (2002).
Moukouri, S. & Jarrell, M. Absence of a Slater transition in the two-dimensional Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 167010 (2001).
Chitra, R. & Kotliar, G. Dynamical mean field theory of the antiferromagnetic metal to antiferromagnetic insulator transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 2386 (1999).
Duffy, D. & Moreo, A. Indications of a metallic antiferromagnetic phase in the two-dimensional U-t model. Phys. Rev. B 55, R676 (1997).
Rozenberg, M. J., Kotliar, G. & Zhang, X. Y. Mott-Hubbard transition in infinite dimensions. II. Phys. Rev. B 49, 10181(1994).
Philippe, C. & Frédéric, M. Tensor network study of the Shastry-Sutherland model in zero magnetic field. Phys. Rev. B. 87, 115144 (2013).
Takushima, Y., Koga, A. & Kawakami, N. Competing spin-gap phases in a frustrated quantum spin system in two dimensions. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 70, 1369 (2001).
Chung, C. H., Marston, J. B. & Sachdev, S. Quantum phases of the Shastry-Sutherland antiferromagnet: Application to SrCu2(BO3)2 . Phys. Rev. B 64, 134407 (2001).
Läuchli, A., Wessel, S. & Sigrist, M. Phase diagram of the quadrumerized Shastry-Sutherland model. Phys. Rev. B 66, 014401 (2002).
Albrecht, M. & Mila, F. First-order transition between magnetic order and valence bond order in a 2D frustrated Heisenberg model. Europhys. Lett. 34, 145 (1996).
Zheng, W., Oitmaa, J. & Hamer, C. J. Phase diagram of the Shastry-Sutherland antiferromagnet. Phys. Rev. B 65, 014408 (2001).
Zheng, W. H., Hamer, C. J. & Oitmaa, J. Series expansions for a Heisenberg antiferromagnetic model for SrCu2(BO3)2 . Phys. Rev. B. 60, 6608 (1999).
Al Hajj, M. & Malrieu, J. Phase transitions in the Shastry-Sutherland lattice. Phys. Rev. B. 72, 094436 (2005).
Isacsson, A. & Syljuåsen, O. F. Variational treatment of the Shastry-Sutherland antiferromagnet using projected entangled pair states. Phys. Rev. E. 74, 026701 (2006).
Morita, H., Watanabe, S. & Imada, M. Nonmagnetic insulating states near the Mott transitions on lattices with geometrical frustration and implications for κ − (ET)2Cu2(CN)3 . J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 71, 2109 (2002).
Kyung, B. & Tremblay, A.-M. S. Mott transition, antiferromagnetism and d-Wave superconductivity in two-dimensional organic conductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 046402 (2006).
Sahebsara, P. & Sénéchal, D. Hubbard model on the triangular lattice: spiral order and spin liquid. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136402 (2008).
Tocchio, L. F., Becca, F., Parola, A. & Sorella, S. Role of backflow correlations for the nonmagnetic phase of the t − t′ Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. B. 78, 041101 (2008).
Yoshioka, T., Koga, A. & Kawakami, N. Quantum phase transitions in the Hubbard model on a triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 036401 (2009).
Yang, H.-Y., Läuchli, A. M., Mila, F. & Schmidt, K. P. Effective spin model for the spin-liquid phase of the Hubbard model on the triangular lattice. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 267204 (2010).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the NKBRSFC under grants Nos. 2011CB921502, 2012CB821305, NSFC under grants Nos. 61227902, 61378017, 11311120053.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
H.D.L. conceived the idea and designed the research and performed calculations. H.D.L., Y.H.C., H.F.L., H.S.T. and W.M.L. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of the results and prepared the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. The images in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the image credit; if the image is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder in order to reproduce the image. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, HD., Chen, YH., Lin, HF. et al. Antiferromagnetic Metal and Mott Transition on Shastry-Sutherland Lattice. Sci Rep 4, 4829 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04829
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04829
This article is cited by
-
Quantum phase transitions in two-dimensional strongly correlated fermion systems
Frontiers of Physics (2015)
-
Layer Anti-Ferromagnetism on Bilayer Honeycomb Lattice
Scientific Reports (2014)
-
Quantum magnetic phase transition in square-octagon lattice
Scientific Reports (2014)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.