Abstract
Two fundamental laser physics phenomena  dissipative soliton and polarisation of light are recently merged to the concept of vector dissipative soliton (VDS), viz. train of short pulses with specific state of polarisation (SOP) and shape defined by an interplay between anisotropy, gain/loss, dispersion and nonlinearity. Emergence of VDSs is both of the fundamental scientific interest and is also a promising technique for control of dynamic SOPs important for numerous applications from nanooptics to high capacity fibre optic communications. Using specially designed and developed fast polarimeter, we present here the first experimental results on SOP evolution of vector soliton molecules with periodic polarisation switching between two and three SOPs and superposition of polarisation switching with SOP precessing. The underlying physics presents an interplay between linear and circular birefringence of a laser cavity along with light induced anisotropy caused by polarisation hole burning.
Introduction
Soliton is a stable selfreinforcing solitary wave that maintains its shape while it travels and interacts with other solitons. This fundamental concept in mathematics and physics was firstly introduced by Norman Zabusky and Martin Kruskal in 1965 and since then has spread all around such fields of science as physics of plasma, optics, laser physics, biology, field theory, chemistry, hydrodynamics and many other fields^{1}. In modelocked lasers (MLLs), the concept of dissipative solitons (DS) is used to describe a train of short pulses with specific shape defined by a complex interplay and balance between the effects of gain/loss, dispersion and nonlinearity^{1,2}. With increased gain in active medium, the fundamental soliton becomes unstable and more complex waveforms can appear, viz. multipulsing^{3,4}, harmonic mode locking^{5}, bound states (BSs)^{1,2,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18} and soliton rain^{1,19}. The bound states originate from balance of repulsive and attractive forces between solitons caused by Kerr nonlinearity and dispersion that can result in tightly BSs in terms of fixed and discrete separations and phase differences of 0, π, or ±π/2. The tightly BS solitons have been experimentally observed in nonlinear polarization rotation, figureofeight, carbon nanotubes (CNT) and graphene based mode locked fibre lasers^{8,9,10,11,12,16,17,18}. In addition, various types of different bound states have been studied theoretically and experimentally including vibrating bound states, oscillating bound states^{2,13}, bound states with flipping and independently evolving phase^{14,15}. Stable bound states – soliton molecules can be used for coding and transmission of information in highlevel modulation formats when multiple bits are transmitted per clock period, increasing capacity of communication channels beyond binary coding limits^{20,21,22,23,24}.
Recently, the vector nature of dissipative solitons has been exploited to reveal polarisation dynamics of DSs or socalled vector dissipative solitons (VDSs)^{4,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34}.The stability of VDSs at the different time scales from femtosecond to microseconds is an important issue to be addressed for increased resolution in metrology^{35}, spectroscopy^{36} and suppressed phase noise in high speed fibre optic communication^{37}. In addition, there is a considerable interest in achieving high flexibility in generation and control of the dynamic SOPs in the context of trapping and manipulation of atoms and nanoparticles^{38,39,40}, control of magnetization^{41} and secure communications^{42}. In our previous publications we have already studied experimentally the conditions for emerging and suppression of VDSs for fundamental and multipulse regimes, viz. VDSs with SOPs locked, pulsetopulse polarisation switched and cyclically evolving^{4,33,34}. In this work we study for the first time SOP dynamics for vector dissipative soliton molecules. Among the aforementioned applications of controllable SOP dynamics, vector soliton molecules are of a special high interest for telecommunications applications in the context of increased capacity in fibre optic telecommunications based on polarisation division multiplexing (PDM) quadrature phase shift keying (PDMQPSK), polarisation switched QPSK (PSQPSK)^{43} and modified coded hybrid subscriber/amplitude/phase/polarisation (HSAPP) modulation schemes^{44}.
In this paper, we present the first experimental results on SOP evolution of tightly BSs – vector soliton molecules with fixed delay and phase differences of π/2 and π along with interleaved BSs with phase differences π/2 and π. Unlike polarisation dynamics of vector solitons on the Poincaré sphere demonstrated by Akhmediev, SotoCrespo^{26} and Komarov et al.^{45}, we study experimentally how polarisation hole burning in an active medium^{46,47,48,49} contributes to the polarisation dynamics. All results are obtained based on inline polarimeter (OFS TruePhase IPLM) optimised for highspeed operation^{50,51,52}.
Results
Tightly bound solitons – soliton molecules
Bound state solitons pulse separation and a phase shift can be determined using optical spectra analysis. When twosoliton bound state has pulse separation τ and a phase shift φ, the amplitude of BS can be found as f(t) + f(t + τ)exp(iφ) and the corresponding optical spectrum can be presented as follows^{18}:
Here F(ν) = FFT(f(t)). The results for different phase shifts are shown in Fig. 1 (a–d). As follows from Fig. 1(a–d), optical spectrum is modulated with the frequency Δν = 1/τ, symmetry of spectrum is phase shift dependent and the spectral power in minima is close to zero. In some experiments a loss of contrast in the spectral fringes was associated with socalled vibrating solitons where pulse separation is oscillating^{13}. However, when the MLL can support interleaving of two twopulse bound states with different phase shifts (0 and −π/2 or π and π/2) based on harmonic mode locking at doubled frequency, the contrast of fringes is also reduced as shown in Fig. 1 (e, f). For MLLs with anomalous dispersion, pulse shape is a hyperbolicsecantsquared giving a timebandwidth product of 0.315. So pulse width ΔT and pulse separation τ can be estimated from an optical spectrum as
Here n = 1.44 is a refractive index of silica fibre, λ is the central wavelength in optical spectrum, c is the speed of light and N is the number of minima in optical spectrum. The obtained metrics will be used further to identify soliton molecules (tightly bound state solitons) in terms of pulse separation and phase shifts.
Experimental setup and results
The ring cavity fibre laser (total cavity length of 7.83 m) shown in Fig. 2 includes high concentration erbium doped fibre (2 m of LIEKKI™ Er808/125), single mode (SM) fibre with anomalous dispersion, polarisation controllers (POCs), a wavelength division multiplexing (WDM) coupler, an optical isolator (OISO), a fast (370 fs relaxation time) saturable absorber in the form of carbon nanotubes (CNT) doped polymer film and an output coupler. The cavity is pumped via 980/1550 WDM by a 976 nm laser diode (LD) with a maximum current of about 355 mA which provides 170 mW of optical power^{33,34}. The laser output is analysed with the help of the optical spectrum analyser (ANDO AQ6317B) and the inline polarimeter (OFS TruePhase IPLM with resolution of 2 ns and the number of samples was 10 M)^{51,52}. IPLM measured the normalized Stokes parameters s_{1}, s_{2}, s_{3} and degree of polarization (DOP) which are related to the output powers of two linearly crosspolarized SOPs and and phase difference between them Δφ as follows:
optimised for the highspeed operation; for further details see below in Methods. In this experiment, pump current was about 300 mA and the incavity and pump polarisation controllers have been tuned to obtain the polarisation attractors shown in Figs. 3,4,5,6. Fig. 3(a) shows a spectrum of tightly twopulse bound state soliton with phase shift of π according to Fig. 1 (b). The corresponding pulse train with the period of 38.9 ns is collected from four polarimeter detectors is shown in insert to Fig. 3 (a). The polarisation dynamics shown in Fig. 3(b–d) take the form of polarisation switching between two SOPs with period equal to two pulse round trips in the laser cavity. DOP oscillations around the value of 90% have also been observed (Fig. 3 (b)). In view of detector integration time (2 ns) being longer than the pulse separation (2 ps), high value of DOP indicates that bound solitons have the same SOP otherwise DOP will be close to zero for the case of orthogonal SOPs. The total laser power (S_{0} in Fig. 3(b)) is constant within ±5% precision. Pulse width and pulse separation have been found from Fig. 3 (a) as 370 fs and 1.5 ps. Contrast of spectral fringes in Fig. 3 (a) is high and the pulse separation is less than five pulse widths, therefore BS is a tightly bound soliton with fixed phase shift and pulse separation^{7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18}. Fig. 4 shows the other type of polarisation dynamics of bound state soliton. The spectrum in Fig. 4 (a) is similar to the previous one shown in Fig. 3(a) and so BS is a tightly bound soliton with fixed phase shift of π and pulse separation of 1.5 ps^{7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18}. In this case, the variations of the total laser power were less than 5% (Fig. 4 (b)). DOP oscillates around the value of 80% with the period equal to three cavity round trips (Fig. 4 (b)). Stokes parameters s_{1}, s_{2}, s_{3} oscillate with the lowest, intermediate and highest values corresponding to each of the localized SOPs shown in Fig. 4 (d). Spectra in Figs. 3 (a) and 4 (a) demonstrate the presence of slight asymmetry. It can be caused by hopping between π and −π/2shifted bound states that arises from changing the erbium gain spectrum under longterm fluctuations of ambient temperature^{18}. High contrast of spectral fringes and small asymmetry of spectrum indicates that lifetime in πshifted BS is much longer than lifetime in −π/2shifted BS. Otherwise, the spectrum takes the form shown in Fig. 5 (a), i.e. it is close to the −π/2shifted tightly BS with pulse width of 370 fs and pulse separation of 1.5 ps. Output power and DOP oscillations with two periods of 3 and 20 round trips as shown in Fig. 5 (b). SOP evolution takes the form of superposition of switching between three SOPs with a precession of these SOPs along a circle trajectory located on Poincaré sphere with the periods of 3 and 20 round trips (Fig. 5 (c, d)).
There are two scenarios resulting in bound state with pulse width of 740 fs and pulse separation of 1.5 ps shown in Fig. 6 (a–d). The first one presents a harmonically mode locked vibrating BS with the period of half round trip (insert to Fig. 6 (a))^{13}. As follows from Fig. 6 (a), insert and Fig. 1 (e), the second scenario is an interleaving of independent tightly bound states with phase shifts of π/2 and π resulting in the same type of harmonic mode locking. The SOPs of two interleaved BSs can be slightly different and so we observe superposition of the SOP switching with precession along the cyclic trajectory on the Poincaré sphere with the period of 14 round trips (Fig. 6 (c, d)).
Discussion
As shown by Akhmediev, SotoCrespo^{26} and Komarov et al.^{45}, the eigenstates for a fibre with the linear birefringence and circular birefringence can be found as follows (Fig. 7 (a)):
Here S_{0} = const and α is determined by the ratio of linear to circular birefringence strength. In our case, the linear and circular birefringenceis are controlled by the incavity polarisation controller. The rate of excitation migration is very high in LIEKKI™ Er808/125 used herein due to the high concentration of erbium ions and so the anisotropy induced by pump light is supressed^{46,47}. Polarisation hole burning^{46,47,48,49} changes the active medium anisotropy (both linear and circular) and so pulse SOP is located on a circle as shown in Fig. 7 (a). If pulsetopulse power is constant and the beat length in the anisotropic cavity is equal to the round trip distance then the pulse SOP is fixed and so vector soliton is polarisation locked^{33,34} (Fig. 7 (b)). In the case of round trip distance being equal to half or third of beat length, the SOP is reproduced in two (Fig. 7 (b)) or three (Fig. 7 (c)) round trips; therefore, polarisation switching takes the forms shown in Figs. 3 (d) and 4 (d). The depth of the hole in the orientational distribution of inversion is proportional to the laser power and so with periodic oscillations of the output power (Fig. 5 (b)) light induced anisotropy in an active medium will be periodically modulated^{46,47,48,49}. In this case, if the round trip is equal to the one third of beat length then SOP after three round trips will deviate slightly from the initial one as shown in Figs. 5 (d) and 7 (d) and can be reproduced only for the period of pulse power oscillations (Fig. 5 (d)). The same holds true for the case of two interleaved BSs with slightly different SOPs that results in superposition of the SOP switching with precession along the cyclic trajectory on the Poincaré sphere with the period of 14 round trips (Fig. 6 (c, d)).
Thus, optimisation of inline polarimeter (OFS TruePhase IPLM) for the highspeed pulsetopulse SOP measurements operation allowed us to reveal new types of vector soliton molecules shown in Figs. 3–6. By unveiling the origin of new types of unique states of polarisation evolving on very complex trajectories, our experimental studies can find applications in the context of design of new types of lasers with controlled dynamical states of polarisation and increased capacity in fibre optic telecommunications based on polarisation division multiplexing (PDM) quadrature phase shift keying (PDMQPSK), polarisation switched QPSK (PSQPSK)^{43} and modified coded hybrid subscriber/amplitude/phase/polarisation (HSAPP) modulation schemes^{44}. The obtained results can also find applications in nanooptics (trapping and manipulation of nanoparticle and atoms^{17,18,19}) and spintronics (vector control of magnetization^{25}).
Methods
Polarimeter principle of operation and design
Conceptually, the most straight forward solution for polarimetry is to measure Stokes vector directly [P, P_{h}P_{v}, P_{45}P_{135}, P_{r}P_{l}], where P is the total signal power and P_{h}, P_{v}, P_{45}, P_{135}, P_{r}, P_{l} are powers measured after ideal horizontal, vertical, 45, 135, right circular, left circular polarizers respectively. However, the practical realization is difficult as a large number of high quality polarizers and waveplates are required^{50}.
An alternative solution is to use 4 polarisation sensitive detectors to measure the light in the direction of 4 noncoplanar Stokes vectors, ideally forming a tetrahedron^{51,52}. Then, the Stokes vector S can be calculated by multiplying a 4 × 4 calibration matrix C to the 4 × 1 detector vector D
where C_{ij} are the elements of the calibration matrix, S_{i} are the Stokes parameters and D_{i} are the powers measured by each detector. This approach requires no moving parts and minimizes the number of required detectors. This configuration was realized in the OFS TruePhase IPLM polarimeter^{51,52}.
The schematic diagram of IPLM polarimeter and its principle of operation are shown in Fig. 8 (a) and (b) respectively. Four fibre Bragg gratings are written in the core of OFS TruePhase polarisation maintaining (HiBi) fibre. The gratings have a 45° blaze angle with respect to the fibre axis. The longitudinal period of the grating along the fibre is roughly 1.07 μm so that core light at 1.55 μm is phase matched to orthogonally scattered light. The 45° blaze angle ensures a highly directional orthogonal scattering with the maximum strength. The orthogonal scattering geometry also provides the polarisation sensitivity. As the induced dipoles are aligned orthogonally to the scattering direction, the strength of the light polarized parallel to the plane of scatter is minimal. Since the interaction length between the intracore light and the orthogonally propagating light is on the order of the core diameter, the scattering is insensitive to wavelength over tens of nanometers. Hence, these gratings act as broadband, highly polarisation sensitive optical taps with the intensity of the scattered light proportional to a projection of the signal polarisation onto the polarisation state defined by the grating.
The first grating is aligned to the HiBi axis of the fibre (the onaxis grating) and 3 other gratings are rotated by 53° with respect to the HiBi axis (the offaxis gratings). The distance between onaxis and offaxis gratings is arbitrary, however it should be minimized in order to reduce the overall birefringence of the device. The separation between 3 offaxis gratings is 1/3 of the fibre beat length (4.8 mm/3 in this case). The 53° rotation between gratings result in 106° angle in Stokes space between the light scattered by the onaxis and the offaxis gratings. The separation between the offaxis gratings of 1/3 of the beat length results in 120° angular rotation about the HiBi axis in Stokes space. Thus, the onaxis grating scatters linearly vertically polarized light and the offaxis gratings project the light onto the circle parallel to the equator with the 120° separation between the light scattered by each of the offaxis gratings, forming a tetrahedron in the Stokes space as shown in Fig. 8b. This configuration gives the best noise performance of the polarimeter and also results in the lowest PDL of the device^{51}. In this polarimeter all gratings are 300 μm long and have strength of approximately 1% and the bandwidth of more than 200 nm. The fibre was glued on top of 4 InP 300 μm wide photodetectors using index matching epoxy. The device has an insertion loss of less than 0.5 dB and polarisation dependent loss (PDL) less than 0.1 dB. The detectors and grating assembly (polarimeter optical head) is packaged in a highspeed package with SMA connectors for each detector. The photodiode biasing circuit was optimised to obtain the maximal electrical bandwidth of the device, which was characterized using a lightwave network analyser by launching modulated light and measuring the frequency response of each detector. The resultant 3 dB electrical bandwidth was 550 MHz with a variation of bandwidth from detector to detector of ±20 MHz and a frequency response difference less than 0.7 dB corresponding to a maximum frequency dependent degree of polarisation (DOP) error of around ±4%.
As discussed earlier, in order to convert detectors values into Stokes vector components, a 4 × 4 calibration matrix is required. One way to compute a polarimeter calibration matrix is to launch 4 known nondegenerate SOPs and compute the C matrix as:
where C_{ij} are the elements of the calibration matrix, S_{ij} are the Stokes vectors and D_{ij} are the measured scattered powers. Although, this technique is relatively simple and robust, it requires another calibrated reference polarimeter or generator of known SOPs, i.e. referenced procedure. A more attractive alternative is a referencefree calibration procedure. Such a calibration procedure relies on the imposition of a constraint on the input signals used to perform the calibration. The simplest and most robust constraint is to use signals with DOP = 1. This condition is relatively easy to verify in narrow linewidth lasers and can be transported over long lengths of fibre without significant degradation. The calibration matrix of the polarimeter is then adjusted so that measurements made at the polarimeter match the constraint on the input polarisations. While this procedure can be effective, a more accurate calibration may be obtained if power is also measured. The referencefree calibration procedure requires several polarisation states to be launched into the device. For each of these, the detector values D_{ij} and power P_{j} are measured, so, the 4 × N matrix of detector values and N power values are obtained. The calibration then has two steps. Firstly, the top row of the calibration matrix is fit to the measured power data P_{j}. The power is the same as S_{0} and is determined by the top row of the calibration matrix.
Thus, the first row C_{0n} must be adjusted to minimize
where are the measured power values. The elements of the first row of C can then be computed through a matrix multiplication:
where
where N_{data} is the total number of data points.
At this stage the first row of the calibration matrix is determined and will be treated as a constant. It contains the power scaling factors relating the detector voltages to the measured power. It also reflects any residual PDL in the optical path between the detectors and the power measurement. The lower 12 elements of C are then adjusted to minimize the DOP difference for all calibration SOPs. This can be accomplished with a nonlinear least squares fitting routine that minimizes Q:
Q is related to (DOP^{2} − 1)^{2} and is an internal metric of the accuracy of the calibration.
Since this is a nonlinear least squares fit, it is useful to obtain an appropriate first guess that is as accurate as possible. For this purpose, the ideal calibration matrix for a polarimeter that measures projections onto a tetrahedron on the Poincare sphere is used. This matrix assumes perfect polarizers and unity gains:
where η is an average scale factor equal to the average of the first row.
The resulting solution for C is still degenerate under Stokes rotations. However, such rotations are not important for measurement of power, DOP and differential changes of the SOP. If an absolute reference is required, it may be obtained in several ways. One of the simplest references is to adjust the HiBi axis of our polarimeter fibre, as detector number one is onaxis and represents a projection onto S_{1}.
To measure fast changes of the SOP of the laser, four detector voltages were recorded simultaneously using an oscilloscope (Tektronix DPO7254). The data collected from the oscilloscope was filtered with a Hanning filter and the Stokes parameters were calculated for each laser pulse.
References
Akhmediev, N. & Ankiewicz, A. Solitons, Nonlinear Pulses and Beams. (Chapman and Hall, London, 1979).
Grelu, Ph. & Akhmediev, N. Dissipative solitons for modelocked lasers. Nature Photon. 26, 84–92 (2012).
Li, F., Wai, P. K. A. & Kutz, J. N. Geometrical description of the onset of multipulsing in modelocked laser cavities. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 2068–2077 (2010).
Williams, M. O., Shlizerman, E. & Kutz, J. N. The multipulsing transition in modelocked lasers: a lowdimensional approach using waveguide arrays. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 27, 2471–2481 (2010).
Grudinin, B. & Gray, S. Passive harmonic mode locking in soliton fiber lasers. JOSA B 14, 144–154 (1997).
Malomed, B. A. BoundStates of Envelope Solitons. Phys. Rev. E 47, 2874–2880 (1993).
Akhmediev, N. N., Ankiewicz, A. & SotoCrespo, J. M. Multisoliton solutions of the complex GinzburgLandau equation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4047–4051 (1997).
Akhmediev, N. N., Ankiewicz, A. & SotoCrespo, J. M. Stable soliton pairs in optical transmission lines and fiber lasers. JOSA B 15, 515–523 (1998).
Grelu, Ph. Belhache, F., Gutty, F. & SotoCrespo, J. M. Phaselocked soliton pairs in a stretchedpulse fiber laser. Opt. Lett. 27, 966–968 (2002).
Seong, N. H. & Kim, D. Y. Experimental observation of stable bound solitons in a figureeight fiber laser. Opt. Lett. 27, 1321–1323 (2002).
Tang, D. Y., Zhao, B., Zhao, L. M. & Tam, H. Y. Soliton interaction in a fiber ring laser. Phys. Rev. E 72, 016616 1–10 (2005).
Zhao, B., Tang, D. Y., Shum, P., Guo, X., Lu, C. & Tam, H. Y. Bound twinpulse solitons in a fiber ring laser. Phys. Rev. E 70, 067602 1–4 (2004).
SotoCrespo, J. M., Grelu, Ph., Akhmediev, N. & Devine, N. Soliton complexes in dissipative systems: Vibrating, shaking and mixed soliton pairs. Phys. Rev. E 75, 01613 1–9 (2007).
Zavyalov, A., Iliew, R., Egorov, O. & Lederer, F. Dissipative soliton molecules with independently evolving or flipping phases in modelocked fiber lasers. Phys. Rev. A 80, 043829 1–8 (2009).
Ortac, B., Zavyalov, A., Nielsen, C. K., Egorov, O. & Iliew, R. et al. Observation of soliton molecules with independently evolving phase in a modelocked fiber laser. Opt. Lett. 35, 1578–1580 (2010).
Wu, X., Tang, D. Y., Luan, X. N. & Zhang, Q. Bound states of solitons in a fiber laser mode locked with carbon nanotube saturable absorber. Opt. Commun. 284, 3615–3618 (2011).
Li, X. L., Zhang, S. M., Meng, Y. C., Hao, Y. P. & Li, H. F. et al. Observation of soliton bound states in a graphene mode locked erbiumdoped fiber laser. Laser Physics 22, 774–777 (2012).
Gui, L. L., Xiao, X. S. & Yang, C. X. Observation of various bound solitons in a carbonnanotubebased erbium fiber laser. JOSA B 30, 158–164 (2013).
Chouli, S. & Grelu, Ph. Soliton rains in a fiber laser: An experimental study. Phys. Rev. A 81, 063829 1–10 (2010).
Rohrmann, P., Hause, A. & Mitschke, F. Solitons Beyond Binary: Possibility of FibreOptic Transmission of Two Bits per Clock Period. Sci Rep. 2, 866 (2012).
Mitschke, F. Compounds of FiberOptic Solitons. Dissipative Solitons II, Akhmediev N. (Ed.), Springer (2007).
Hause, A., Hartwig, H., Seifert, B., Stolz, H., Böhm, M. & Mitschke, F. Phase structure of soliton molecules. Physical Review A 75, 063836 1–7 (2007).
Mezentsev, V. K. & Turitsyn, S. K. New class of solitons in fibers near the zerodispersion point. Sov. J. Quantum Electron. 21, 555–557 (1991).
Mezentsev, V. K. & Turitsyn, S. K. Novel type of solitons in optical fibers. Sov. Lightwave Communications 1, 263–270 (1991).
Haus, J. W., Shaulov, G., Kuzin, E. A. & SanchezMondragon, J. Vector soliton fiber lasers. Opt. Lett. 24, 376–378 (1999).
Akhmediev, N. & SotoCrespo, J. M. Dynamics of solitonlike pulse propagation in birefringent optical fibers. Phys. Rev. E. 49, 5742–5754 (1994).
Collings, B. C., Cundiff, S. T., Akhmediev, N. N., SotoCrespo, J. M. & Bergman, K. et al. Polarizationlocked temporal vector solitons in a fiber laser: experiment. JOSA B 17, 354–365 (2000).
Barad, Y. & Silberberg, Y. Polarization Evolution and Polarization Instability of Solitons in Birefringent Optical Fibers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3290–3293 (1997).
Silberberg, Y. & Barad, Y. Rotating Vector Solitary Waves in Isotropic Fibers. Opt. Lett. 20, 246–248 (1995).
Zhang, H., Tang, D. Y., Zhao, L. M. & Tam, H. Y. Induced solitons formed by cross polarization coupling in a birefringent cavity fiber laser. Opt Lett 33, 2317–2319 (2008).
Zhao, L. M., Tang, D. Y., Zhang, H. & Wu, X. Polarization rotation locking of vector solitons in a fiber ring laser. Opt. Express 16, 10053–10058 (2008).
Tang, D. Y., Zhang, H., Zhao, L. M. & Wu, X. Observation of HighOrder PolarizationLocked Vector Solitons in a Fiber Laser. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 153904 1–4 (2008).
Mou, Ch., Sergeyev, S. V., Rozhin, A. & Turitsyn, S. K. Allfiber polarization locked vector soliton laser using carbon nanotubes. Opt. Lett. 36, 3831–3833 (2011).
Sergeyev, S. V., Mou, Ch., Rozhin, A. & Turitsyn, S. K. Vector Solitons with Locked and Precessing States of Polarization. Opt. Express 20, 27434–27440 (2012).
Udem, Th., Holzwarth, R. & Hänsch, T. W. Optical frequency metrology. Nature 416, 233–237 (2002).
Mandon, J., Guelachvili, G. & Picqué, N. Fourier transform spectroscopy with a laser frequency comb. Nature Photon. 25, 99–102 (2009).
Hillerkuss, D., Schmogrow, R., Schellinger, T., Jordan, M. & Winter, M. et al. 26 Tbit s^{−1} 21 linerate superchannel transmission utilizing alloptical fast Fourier transform processing. Nature Photon. 5, 364–371 (2011).
Jiang, Y., Narushima, T. & Okamoto, H. Nonlinear optical effects in trapping nanoparticles with femtosecond pulses. Nature Phys. 6, 1005–1009 (2010).
Tong, L., Miljkovic, V. D. & Käll, M. Alignment, Rotation and Spinning of Single Plasmonic Nanoparticles and Nanowires Using Polarization Dependent Optical Forces. Nano Lett. 10, 268–273 (2010).
Spanner, M., Davitt, K. M. & Ivanova, M. Yu. Stability of angular confinement and rotational acceleration of a diatomic molecule in an optical centrifuge. J. Chem Phys. 115, 8403–8410 (2001).
Kanda, N., Higuchi, T., Shimizu, H., Konishi, K., Yoshioka, K. et al. The vectorial control of magnetization by light. Nature Comm. 2, 362; 10.1038/ncoms1366 (2011).
Van Wiggeren, G. D. & Roy, R. Communication with Dynamically Fluctuating States of Light Polarization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 097903 1–4 (2002).
Serena, P., Rossi, N. & Bononi, A. PDMiRZQPSK vs. PSQPSK at 100 Gbit/s over dispersionmanaged links. Opt. Express 20, 7895–7900 (2012).
Batshon, H. G., Djordjevic, I., Xu, L. & Wang, T. Modified hybrid subcarrier/amplitude/phase/polarization LDPCcoded modulation for 400 Gb/s optical transmission and beyond. Opt. Express 18, 14108–14113 (2010).
Komarov, A., Komarov, K., Meshcheriakov, D., Amrani, F. & Sanchez, F. Polarization dynamics in nonlinear anisotropic fibers. Phys. Rev. A 82, 013813 1–14 (2010).
Sergeyev, S. Interplay of an Anisotropy and Orientational Relaxation Processes in Luminescence and Lasing of Dyes. Handbook of advanced electronic and photonic materials: Nalwa H. S. (ed.), Vol. 7, 247–276 (Academic Press, San Diego, USA, 2001).
Sergeyev, S. V. Spontaneous Light Polarization Symmetry Breaking for an anisotropic ring cavity dye laser. Phys. Rev. A 59, 3909–3917 (1999).
Zeghlache, H. & Boulnois, A. Polarization instability in lasers. I. Model and steady states of neodymiumdoped fiber lasers. Phys. Rev. A 52, 4229–4242 (1995).
Leners, R. & Stéphan, G. Rate equation analysis of a multimode bipolarization Nd^{3+} doped fibre laser. Quantum. Semiclass. Opt. 7, 757–794 (1995).
Azzam, R. M. A. Inline lightsaving photopolarimeter and its fiberoptic analog. Opt. Lett 12, 568–560 (1987).
Mikhailov, V., Dunn, S. & Westbrook, P. S. Robust remote calibration of fiber polarimeters. Proceedings of Optical Fiber Communication Conference OFC2011, Los Angeles, California, United States, 2011 March 6–10, Optical paper OWC4 (2011).
Westbrook, P. S., Reyes, P. & Ging, J. Optimized inline fiber polarimeter taps for PMD and polarization monitoring. Proceedings of National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference NFOEC2002, Dallas, Texas, USA, 2002 September 15–19, Vol 3, pp. 1960–196 (2002).
Acknowledgements
Support of the ERC, EPSRC (project UNLOC, EP/J017582/1), grant of the Russian Ministry of Education and Science Federation (agreement N11.519.11.4001), European Research Council (ULTRALASER) and FP7PEOPLE2012 IAPP (project GRIFFON, No 324391) is acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.V.S. initialised work and made a major contribution to the interpretation of results and manuscript writing; V.M., B.R. and P.S.W. contributed to the description of fast polarimeter; V. Ts. made experiments with polarimeter, Ch. Mou developed a mode locked laser; CNT films has been manufactured by A.R.; S.K.T. participated in the analysis and interpretation of the results; all authors contributed to the manuscript writing and reviewed the manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercialNoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/byncnd/3.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Tsatourian, V., Sergeyev, S., Mou, C. et al. Polarisation Dynamics of Vector Soliton Molecules in Mode Locked Fibre Laser. Sci Rep 3, 3154 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03154
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03154
Further reading

Spontaneous symmetry breaking of dissipative optical solitons in a twocomponent Kerr resonator
Nature Communications (2021)

Revealing the nature of morphological changes in carbon nanotubepolymer saturable absorber under highpower laser irradiation
Scientific Reports (2018)

Route towards extreme optical pulsation in linear cavity ultrafast fibre lasers
Scientific Reports (2018)

DoubleWall Carbon Nanotube Hybrid ModeLocker in Tmdoped Fibre Laser: A Novel Mechanism for Robust BoundState Solitons Generation
Scientific Reports (2017)

Groupvelocitylocked vector soliton molecules in fiber lasers
Scientific Reports (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.