Correlative light and electron microscopy promises to combine molecular specificity with nanoscale imaging resolution. However, there are substantial technical challenges including reliable co-registration of optical and electron images and rapid optical signal degradation under electron beam irradiation. Here, we introduce a new approach to solve these problems: imaging of stable optical cathodoluminescence emitted in a scanning electron microscope by nanoparticles with controllable surface chemistry. We demonstrate well-correlated cathodoluminescence and secondary electron images using three species of semiconductor nanoparticles that contain defects providing stable, spectrally-distinguishable cathodoluminescence. We also demonstrate reliable surface functionalization of the particles. The results pave the way for the use of such nanoparticles for targeted labeling of surfaces to provide nanoscale mapping of molecular composition, indicated by cathodoluminescence colour, simultaneously acquired with structural electron images in a single instrument.
The correlation of light microscopy with electron microscopy offers considerable scope for new discovery and applications in the physical and life sciences by providing images with both molecular specificity and nanoscale spatial resolution1. However, such an approach also faces substantial technical challenges in the reliable and efficient co-registration of optical and electron images2,3,4. Here, we introduce a new means of overcoming these hurdles: the simultaneous acquisition in a scanning electron microscope (SEM) of secondary electron (SE) images that are spatially well-correlated with optical cathodoluminescence (CL) from robust nanoparticles (NPs) containing stable, spectrally-distinct luminescent defects and having controllable surface chemistry. We demonstrate well-correlated NP-CL and SE images with nanoscale resolution using three species of semiconductor NPs that provide stable CL in distinguishable colours at room temperature. We also show that CL-emitting NPs can be reliably surface-functionalized, which will ultimately enable targeted labeling of molecular constituents in thin sections or on surfaces to provide multi-colour nanoscale mapping of molecular composition, well-correlated with SE structural images.
The interaction of keV electrons with a solid can produce CL photons5, a phenomenon widely used for spatially-resolved characterization of semiconductors and insulators. For imaging biological samples, the potential of CL to provide molecular localization has been recognized for some time6. However, efforts to obtain nanoscale CL image resolution have been hindered by low photon count rates and rapid signal degradation due to the destruction of biomolecules and organic fluorophores under electron beam irradiation7,8. These problems may be overcome with correlated CL and SE imaging of surface-functionalizable NPs that emit stable, spectrally-distinct CL. The NPs can be conjugated to antibodies or other high-affinity ligands and used to stain EM-prepared tissue, either pre- or post-embedding, in analogy with well-established techniques for immunogold labeling9. The CL colour will enable identification and localization of multiple specific molecular targets in a sample labeled by NPs, while the correlated SE signal simultaneously provides high-resolution information about the cellular context. Similar methods could also be applied to the nanoscale characterization of complex, chemically active surfaces (e.g., biomaterials surfaces10, nanocatalysts11 or novel organic photovoltaic materials12). Furthermore, in conjunction with evolving techniques for wet electron microscopy13, NP-CL could provide multi-colour nanoscale particle tracking with applications in biology, colloid science and microfluidic device characterization.
Electrons incident on semiconductors undergo a series of elastic and inelastic scattering events, depositing energy in a roughly spherical volume with characteristic radius ~1 μm for typical material densities and electron beam energies ~10 keV13,14,15. Empirically, inelastic interactions generate an average number of electron-hole pairs per incident electron nEHP ≈ Ebeam/(3Egap), where Ebeam is the beam energy and Egap is the semiconductor bandgap energy. Electron-hole pairs recombine radiatively by direct, excitonic or impurity-assisted processes, or non-radiatively via phonon interactions or surface recombination. In particular, recombination at colour centers and other defects produces CL photons at highly characteristic wavelengths, with a spectrum and intensity controllable by doping or implantation. While much attention has been given to the CL properties of rare-earth-doped nanophosphors for application in particle detectors and display devices (e.g., see16,17,18), there have been few CL studies of well-dispersed NPs and of nanodiamonds in particular19.
Correlative imaging with spectrally distinct NPs
We investigated NP-CL properties and collected correlated CL and SE images using a field emission SEM (JEOL JSM-7001F) outfitted with a spectrally-selective, PMT-based CL detection system (Fig. 1a). We identified three types of semiconductor NPs that provide bright, stable CL with distinct emission spectra at room temperature (Fig. 1b): (i) Nanodiamonds containing nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers produce red CL at wavelength λ ~ 620 nm. These type 1b HPHT nanodiamonds have ~100 ppm nitrogen impurities and were irradiated with He ions and annealed to promote NV formation (purchased from Academia Sinica,Taiwan)20. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) measurements gave a mean particle size of 82 ± 22 nm in an aqueous suspension. (ii) Cerium-doped Lutetium-Aluminum Garnet (LuAG:Ce) nanophosphors produce green CL at λ ~ 510 nm (Boston Applied Technologies). DLS measurements gave a mean particle size of 37 ± 13 nm. (iii) Nanodiamonds with high concentrations of ‘band-A’ defects generate blue CL at λ ~ 420 nm. These type 1a natural nanodiamonds (Microdiamant AG) had a DLS-measured mean particle size of 48 ± 14 nm. The mechanism of ‘band-A’ CL generation in diamond films is commonly associated with physical defects such as dislocations and twinning in the diamond lattice21,22. We note that the CL spectra generated by all types of NPs studied here are qualitatively consistent with those of bulk samples and thin films containing the same defects. The good distinguishability of these emission spectra satisfies a key requirement for multi-color correlative imaging under e-beam excitation, which, unlike fluorescence excitation with colored light, is not fluorophore-specific.
Correlative NP-CL and SE imaging combines the best features of both multi-colour optical fluorescence and high-resolution electron microscopy. To illustrate this, we acquired SE and colour CL images with nanoscale resolution, simultaneously and in the same instrument, for each of the three types of NPs (Fig. 2). For comparison, we also imaged each sample region using a confocal fluorescence microscope. The SE images have high spatial resolution (limited by e-beam diffraction to approximately 5 nm for our geometry), but are effectively monochromatic. The confocal images show distinct colours in fluorescence (essentially the same colours as for CL), but with photon-diffraction-limited resolution (dFWHM ~ λ/(2 NA) ~ 200–300 nm), which is insufficient to resolve individual NPs. The NP-CL images, however, provide unique information, allowing both (i) spectral discrimination between NP species and (ii) image resolution of particles as small as ~30 nm. For many applications NP-CL will provide a considerable improvement over conventional EM techniques such as molecular labeling using gold nanoparticles, because the spectral distinguishability of the three NP markers allows spatial relationships between different molecular targets to be determined at nanoscale resolution. (Furthermore, the set of distinct NP-CL colours could be expanded by incorporating more than one type of defect in a NP, or by imaging at cryogenic temperatures to obtain narrower spectral lines23.) Importantly, while some progress has been made in the past by simultaneously marking distinct epitopes with different sizes24 or shapes25 of high electron-contrast NPs, the colour separation of NP-CL is unambiguous and therefore constitutes a better labeling strategy. But perhaps the greatest advantage of NP-CL imaging over previous approaches is that the CL signal can be ascertained at any resolution, whereas labeling with electron-scattering particles requires sufficient resolution to detect and/or discriminate between them. NP-CL is, in this respect, a truly multi-scale imaging technique.
Spatial resolution of NP-CL imaging
The limiting spatial resolution of NP-CL with scanning e-beam excitation is determined by the larger of either beam spot diameter or NP size. This is because the carrier recombination length in semiconductors like diamond is on the order of 100 nm to 1 μm at room temperature26; hence electron-hole pairs induced by the e-beam fill the entire NP volume and can excite CL from colour centers irrespective of its point of impact on the NP. The spatial resolution of the NP-CL imaging demonstrations presented here is set by NP size (>10 nm), rather than the diffraction-limited e-beam spot size (~5 nm). To quantify the fraction of NPs of each type that produce detectable rates of CL as a function of particle size, we collected and analyzed several sets of co-localized SE and CL nanoparticle images. Characteristic data for a sample of green-CL LuAG:Ce NPs are presented in Figs. 3a–b. A high degree of correspondence between the SE and CL images is clearly visible, although some of the smallest NPs were not detectable in CL at practical integration times (~90 μs / pixel). The halo-like effect visible around the larger particles in the CL image is attributed to high energy electrons that are scattered at low angles as the e-beam scans over nearby regions of the silicon substrate and pass into the NP volume to generate CL. (Its absence around smaller particles is likely due to their lower overall CL efficiency.) Size statistics obtained for a total sample of ~1100 green-CL NPs are shown in Fig. 3c, with black bars indicating the overall distribution of NP diameters (determined from SE images) and green bars representing the sub-population with detectable levels of green CL under our imaging conditions. This CL-bright fraction comprised ~0.42 of the total NP population, with a mean bright NP diameter of 54 ± 17 nm. Similar results were obtained for red-CL (blue-CL) NPs, with a bright fraction of ~0.27 (~0.29) and mean bright NP diameter of 81 ± 25 nm (77 ± 16 nm). We draw particular attention to the five NPs indicated by red boxes in the SE and CL images of Figs. 3a–b. These NPs have diameter ≤ 35 nm yet also generate strong CL (> 5σ above background). Such small, bright NPs can be selectively isolated and accumulated by centrifugal fractionation to provide NP-CL imaging resolution comparable to state-of-the-art super-resolution optical imaging with organic fluorophores27,28.
NPs have good CL stability
For bioimaging applications, the resistance of semiconductor NPs to damage under e-beam irradiation at keV energies is a key advantage compared to CL-emitting organic molecules. For each of the three types of semiconductor NPs, we demonstrated good luminescence stability by performing repeated CL imaging scans over a field of NPs deposited on a silicon wafer (Fig. 3d–e). Even after 10 full scans, corresponding to a total dose of approximately ~109 electrons for a 50 nm particle, the CL signal for each type of NP showed only minor (~ 20–30%) decrease. Furthermore, we found that this fractional CL signal decrease after 10 scans remained the same when the scan area was decreased by a factor of 4 while keeping the beam current and total exposure time fixed. These observations are consistent with hydrocarbon contamination of the sample surface29 (which empirically depends on total exposure time), rather than e-beam damage to the NPs (which should increase with total electron dose per unit area). In comparison, CL emission from typical organic compounds decays by an order of magnitude after an electron dose ~100 times smaller than we applied to the semiconductor NPs8.
Functionalization of NPs
Many of the applications we envision for correlated NP-CL and SE imaging will require targeted delivery of NPs to sites of interest, necessitating control over NP surface chemistry. Techniques for covalent functionalization of nanodiamonds have been demonstrated by a variety of groups30,31,32 and recent work on functionalization of YAG nanocrystals33 should be directly relevant to LuAG surfaces. As a proof of principle of NP surface functionalization while maintaining good CL properties, we used amine chemistry to bind antibodies tagged with a red fluorophore (Invitrogen Alexa-647) to blue-CL nanodiamonds. We then deposited a sample of these antibody-conjugated NPs onto a grid-etched silicon wafer and imaged the sample in optical fluorescence followed by cathodoluminescence (Fig. 4). These images show a high degree of spatial correlation, indicating that a large fraction (~0.71) of the NPs were successfully attached to fluorophore-tagged antibodies while still exhibiting good CL emission. Subsequent optical imaging showed almost no signal in the red channel due to degradation of the organic fluorophore under exposure to the electron beam, whereas the robust blue fluorescence was unchanged. A key challenge to be addressed in future work is the use of functionalized NPs for high-specificity labeling of antigens in embedded tissue or other molecular targets. Note that successful immmunostaining with colloidal gold particles as large as 30 nm has been reported34, suggesting that specific labeling may be possible with only minor improvements in cathodoluminescent NP size and brightness.
Our results demonstrate a new approach to correlative light and electron microscopy using colourcathodoluminescence (CL) from semiconductor nanoparticles (NPs), which can be controllably fabricated to contain spectrally distinct colour centers and defects that are stable under prolonged electron-beam exposure, have good spectral separation and can be surface-functionalized to enable labeling of specific molecules and structures on a wide range of samples. In the present operational regime, the NP-CL imaging resolution is set by particle size ~ 40–80 nm for the three types of NPs studied here. With optimized selection of small NPs having high defect concentration, we expect NP-CL imaging resolution ≤ 30 nm will soon be available. Resolution < 10 nm may eventually be realized through ongoing improvements in fabrication of small NPs with high defect concentration35,36. The speed and ease of colour NP-CL imaging will also be enhanced by optimization of CL optical collection efficiency and parallel imaging of different CL colours, e.g., with multiple CL detection paths or use of a broadband spectrograph.
We foresee applications of correlated NP-CL and SE imaging to nanoscale functional imaging in biological samples, e.g., in serial-SEM connectomics37, where multi-colour NP-CL could allow targeted identification of molecular markers such as neurotransmitter enzymes, postsynaptic receptor types, peptides and calcium binding proteins that differentiate classes of neurons and synapses and be correlated with nanoscale SE structural images of thin-slice (~30 nm) neural tissue. More generally, functionalized cathodoluminescent nanoparticles will provide a powerful new tool for correlative light and electron microscopy in the physical and life sciences, enabling both molecular localization and structural imaging at nanometer resolution, simultaneously and in a single instrument.
Nanoparticles (NPs) were suspended in water or ethanol at concentrations of 0.01–1 mg/ml. To reduce the effects of aggregation, green cathodoluminescent (CL) LuAG:Ce particles were ultrasonicated with a probe sonicator (Branson 450) at 120 W average power for 30 minutes fractionated by repeated centrifugation to remove agglomerates; this procedure was not necessary for the nanodiamond samples. Particle size distributions were then measured using a dynamic light scattering system (Delsa Nano C).
NP sample preparation for EM
NP samples for secondary electron (SE) and CL imaging were suspended in water or ethanol at densities of 0.01–1 g/ml, then drop-cast onto silicon wafer substrates. The substrates were first prepared by inscribing a series of 10 μm grids using reactive ion etching to facilitate image co-localization, followed by surface oxidation in air plasma. NPs were placed directly onto the bare wafers, with no additional surfactants or coatings. The data shown in Figs. 2 and 3 contain only one species of NP at a time; preparation of samples containing all three species is possible, but more challenging because of the need for additional surface treatment of the NPs to prevent aggregation between particles of different species.
SEM image collection and processing
All scanning electron microscope (SEM) data (except spectra shown in Fig. 1b – see below) were obtained using a JEOL JSM-7001F SEM, fitted with a KE Developments Centaurus CL detector. The CL detector consisted of a curved mirror, light guide, photomultiplier (Electron Tubes 9924B) and a variable interference filter for spectral selectivity, allowing greater photon throughput than is normally possible with grating-based CL detectors. Standard imaging conditions were 5 keV electron beam energy and 1.2 nA current. The beam was scanned with a pixel size of approximately 2 nm (except in the case of the smaller LuAG:Ce particles, for which a 1.3 nm pixel size was used) and a dwell time of 2.7 μs (90 μs) for SE (CL) images, enabling detection of CL from the smallest NPs in Fig. 3c. The beam current was measured with a standard Faraday cup and was multiplied by the pixel dwell time and inverse pixel size to obtain the total e− doses reported in Fig. 3d. Successive CL images were taken in each colour channel by turning off the beam between scans, disconnecting the photomultiplier and changing the interference filter in the optical detection path. Each CL image was associated with a simultaneously-collected SE image of the same field. SE signals were detected using a standard Everhart-Thornley detector29. CL photon detection rates were determined by digitally counting edges in the amplified output of the PMT in the Centaurus CL detector. Image processing consisted of applying a ~5 nm Gaussian blur (significantly smaller than the minimum observed bright particle diameter) to remove noise at high spatial frequencies, followed by thresholding and application of a blob-finding algorithm to determine NP coordinates and size. In cases where a blob was visible in one or more CL channels that corresponded spatially to an object in the SE image (i.e., a cathodoluminescent NP), the size of that NP was taken to be the mean FWHM diameter of the SE blob. The average intensity in each CL colour channel was then used to assign a colour to the NP.
STEM NP-CL spectroscopy
NP-CL emission spectra (shown in Fig. 1b) were collected using a JEOL 2011 microscope in scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) mode, fitted with a grating monochromator-based CL detector (Gatan MonoCL3)38. Samples were prepared by suspending NPs in distilled water or ethanol at a concentration of 1 mg / mL, then drop-casting onto lacy carbon TEM grids (Ted Pella 01883-F). Particles were first located and imaged in panchromatic mode with a scanning e-beam at 120 keV. Because of the high electron energy and correspondingly long penetration depth, strong CL signals were best observed from relatively large NPs (diameter ≥ 200 nm). The CL spectra were collected by fixing the beam position and scanning the grating with 50 μm slit width, giving ~0.6 nm wavelength resolution. Spectra collected at different beam positions in a given NP were repeatable, as were the spectra of different NPs in the same sample. STEM-CL spectra from these larger NPs were used in selecting interference filters for the different color channels in the SEM instrument used for NP-CL imaging.
The optical fluorescence images of the NPs shown in Fig. 2 (same samples as used in the SE and CL images in Fig. 2) were collected with a Zeiss LSM-710 beam-scanning confocal microscope, using a 0.95 NA, 100× magnification air objective. (Oil objectives afford somewhat higher resolution, but create complications due to etalon effects that arise when a coverslip is placed over the silicon substrate.) Blue nanodiamonds were excited at 405 nm (excitation intensity 80 MW/cm2) and their fluorescence was detected in the range 425–475 nm; the excitation beam was scanned with 5.2 nm pixel size and 100 μs dwell time. Green LuAG:Ce NPs were excited at 440 nm (intensity 36 MW/cm2) and detected at 480–630 nm, with 5.2 nm pixel size and 100 μs dwell time. Red nanodiamonds were excited at 561 nm (intensity 5 MW/cm2) and detected at 520–735 nm, with 5.2 nm pixel size and 25 μs dwell time. The fluorescence image of Alexa 647-tagged antibodies bound to blue nanodiamonds shown in Fig. 4a (same sample as used in the CL image in Fig. 4b) was obtained using a Zeiss LSM5 wide-field microscope and a 0.95 NA, 100× air objective, with excitation by a mercury vapor arc lamp (X-Cite series 120Q) and a Cy5 filter set (Chroma series 41008).
The nanodiamonds (from Microdiamant) shown in Fig.4 were cleaned with concentrated H2SO4 - HNO3 - POCl4 (1:1:1, vol/vol/vol) solution at 85°C for 3 days. After cleaning, the nanodiamonds (NDs) were functionalized with carboxyl groups by refluxing in 0.1 M NaOH aqueous solution at 90°C for 2 h and subsequently in 0.1 M HCl aqueous solution at 90°C for 2 h. The resulting oxidized NDs were separated by centrifugation, rinsed extensively and resuspended in deionized water. N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N'-ethyl-carbodiimide hydrochloric and N-hydroxysuccinimide were dissolved together in oxidized diamond suspension, followed by addition of poly-L-lysine (PLLs) (MW 30,000, Sigma) to the suspension. Then the resulting NDs were acrylated with succinic anhydride in order to generate terminal carboxyl acid groups. These carboxyl groups on NDs were converted into a reactive N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester intermediate using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDC) and NHS. Finally, the ND samples were covered for 2 h with a solution of the antibodies (1 mg/mL) in phosphate buffer at pH 7.4.
Modla, S. & Czymmek, K. J. Correlative microscopy: A powerful tool for exploring neurological cells and tissues. Micron 42, 773–792 (2011).
Bock, D. D. et al. Network anatomy and in vivo physiology of visual cortical neurons. Nature 471, 177–182 (2011).
Briggman, K. L., Helmstaedter, M. & Denk, W. Wiring speci_city in the direction-selectivity circuit of the retina. Nature 471, 183–188 (2011).
Micheva, K. D., Busse, B., Weiler, N. C., O'Rourke, N. & Smith, S. J. Single-synapse analysis of a diverse synapse population: Proteomic imaging methods and markers. Neuron 68, 639–653 (2010).
Parish, C. M. & Russell, P. E. Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics, vol. 147, chap. 1, Scanning Cathodoluminescence Microscopy, 2–135 (2007).
Hough, P. V., McKinney, W. R., Ledbeter, M. C., Pollack, R. E. & Moos, H. W. Identification of biological molecules in situ at high resolution via the fluorescence excited by a scanning electron beam. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 73, 317–321 (1976).
Kimura, E. et al. Cathodoluminescence imaging for identifying uptaken fluorescence materials in kupffer cells using scanning electron microscopy. Archives of Histology and Cytology 67, 263–270 (2004).
Niitsuma, J.-i., Oikawa, H., Kimura, E., Ushiki, T. & Sekiguchi, T. Cathodoluminescence investigation of organic materials. Journal of Electron Microscopy 54, 325–330 (2005).
Stirling, J. W. Immuno- and affinity probes for electron microscopy: a review of labeling and preparation techniques. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry 38, 145–157 (1990).
Merrett, K., Cornelius, R. M., McClung, W. G., Unsworth, L. D. & Sheardown, H. Surface analysis methods for characterizing polymeric biomaterials. Journal of Biomaterials Science – Polymer Edition 13, 593–621 (2002).
Li, Y. & Somorjai, G. A. Nanoscale advances in catalysis and energy applications. Nano Letters 10, 2289–2295 (2010).
Hains, A. W., Liang, Z., Woodhouse, M. A. & Gregg, B. A. Molecular semiconductors in organic photovoltaic cells. Chemical Reviews 110, 6689–6735 (2010).
Thiberge, S. et al. Scanning electron microscopy of cells and tissues under fully hydrated conditions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, 3346–3351 (2004).
Yacobi, B. G. & Holt, D. B. Cathodoluminescence scanning electron microscopy of semiconductors. Journal of Applied Physics 59, R1–R24 (1986).
Kanaya, K. & Okayama, S. Penetration and energy-loss theory of electrons in solid targets. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 5, 43 (1972).
Pankratov, V., Grigorjeva, L., Chernov, S., Chudoba, T. & Lojkowski, W. Luminescence properties and energy transfer processes in nanosized cerium doped YAG. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 55, 1509–1513 (2008).
Chang, H.-Y., Lee, H.-D., Wu, M.-L. & Lin, L.-J. Highly efficient cathodoluminescence of nanophosphors by solvothermal route. Journal of Luminescence 130, 969–975 (2010).
Wang, L., Yin, M., Guo, C. & Zhang, W. Synthesis and luminescent properties of Ce3+ doped LuAG nano-sized powders by mixed solvo-thermal method. Journal of Rare Earths 28, 16–21 (2010).
Tizei, L. H. G. & Kociak, M. Spectrally and spatially resolved cathodoluminescence of nanodiamonds: local variations of the NV0 emission properties. Nanotechnology 23, 175702 (2012).
Chang, Y.-R. et al. Mass production and dynamic imaging of fluorescent nanodiamonds. Nature Nanotechnology 3, 284–288 (2008).
Graham, R. J. & Ravi, K. V. Cathodoluminescence investigation of impurities and defects in single crystal diamond grown by the combustion flame method. Applied Physics Letters 60, 1310–1312 (1992).
Marinelli, M., Hatta, A., Ito, T., Hiraki, A. & Nishino, T. Band-a emission in synthetic diamond films: A systematic investigation. Applied Physics Letters 68, 1631–1633 (1996).
Watanabe, H., Kitamura, T., Nakashima, S. & Shikata, S. Cathodoluminescence characterization of a nitrogen-doped homoepitaxial diamond thin film. Journal of Applied Physics 105, 093529 (2009).
Wang, B.-L. & Larsson, L. I. Simultaneous demonstration of multiple antigens by indirect immunofluorescence or immunogold staining. Histochemistry and Cell Biology 83, 47–56 (1985).
Giepmans, B. N. G., Deerinck, T. J., Smarr, B. L., Jones, Y. Z. & Ellisman, M. H. Correlated light and electron microscopic imaging of multiple endogenous proteins using quantum dots. Nature Methods 2, 743–749 (2005).
Malinauskas, T. et al. Optical evaluation of carrier lifetime and diffusion length in synthetic diamonds. Diamond and Related Materials 17, 1212–1215 (2008).
Huang, B., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. Super-resolution fluorescence microscopy. Annual Review of Biochemistry 78, 993–1016 (2009).
Hell, S. W. Far-field optical nanoscopy. In Grslund A., et al. (eds.) Single Molecule Spectroscopy in Chemistry, Physics and Biology, vol. 96 of Springer Series in Chemical Physics, 365–398 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2010).
Reimer, L. Scanning Electron Microscopy: Physics of Image Formation and Microanalysis (Springer, New York, USA, 1998).
Fu, C.-C. et al. Characterization and application of single fluorescent nanodiamonds as cellular biomarkers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104, 727–732 (2007).
Krueger, A., Stegk, J., Liang, Y., Lu, L. & Jarre, G. Biotinylated nanodiamond: Simple and efficient functionalization of detonation diamond. Langmuir 24, 4200–4204 (2008).
Schrand, A. M., Hens, S. A. C. & Shenderova, O. A. Nanodiamond particles: Properties and perspectives for bioapplications. Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences 34, 18–74 (2009).
Sahraneshin, A. et al. Synthesis and morphology control of surface functionalized nanoscale yttrium aluminum garnet particles via supercritical hydrothermal method. Progress in Crystal Growth and Characterization of Materials - (2011).
Mahendrasingam, S., Wallam, C. A., & Hackney, C. M. Two approaches to double post-embedding immunogold labeling of freeze-substituted tissue embedded in low temperature Lowicryl HM20 resin. Brain Research Protocols 11, 134–141 (2003).
Smith, B. R. et al. Five-nanometer diamond with luminescent nitrogen-vacancy defect centers. Small 5, 1649–1653 (2009).
Tisler, J. et al. Fluorescence and spin properties of defects in single digit nanodiamonds. ACS Nano 3, 1959–1965 (2009).
Blow, N. Following the wires. Nature Methods 4, 975–981 (2007).
Lim, S. K. et al. Direct correlation between structural and optical properties of iii-v nitride nanowire heterostructures with nanoscale resolution. Nano Letters 9, 3940–3944 (2009).
This work was partially supported by the NSF and the Smithsonian Institution.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Glenn, D., Zhang, H., Kasthuri, N. et al. Correlative light and electron microscopy using cathodoluminescence from nanoparticles with distinguishable colours. Sci Rep 2, 865 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep00865
Preparation of silver-decorated Soluplus® nanoparticles and antibacterial activity towards S. epidermidis biofilms as characterized by STEM-CL spectroscopy
Materials Science and Engineering: C (2021)
Correlative cathodoluminescence electron microscopy bioimaging: towards single protein labelling with ultrastructural context
Heroes or Villains? How Nontraditional Luminescent Materials Do and Do Not Enhance Bioanalysis and Imaging
Chemistry of Materials (2020)
Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews (2019)
Production, surface modification and biomedical applications of nanodiamonds: A sparkling tool for theranostics
Materials Science and Engineering: C (2019)