Main

A. De Jongh, F. M. D. Oosterink, Y. R. van Rood and I. H. A. Aartman

commentary

This fascinating piece of work addresses the concern that individuals with the symptoms of Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD) will be attracted to aesthetic dental treatment with potentially poor outcomes. As I have argued elsewhere there is a need for caution in assigning psychiatric labels.1 There are two central diagnostic features of BDD; the first is preoccupation with appearance, and the second is clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning arising from the preoccupation. Such impairment may be significant. In individuals with diagnosed BDD, 27% have been housebound at some point in the disorder, some 78% have thoughts of suicide, and one sixth and one third of cases have attempted suicide.2

There is a danger in arguing that a desire to seek treatment in individuals with preoccupations with their appearance is irrational. Whilst a preoccupation with appearance may not be rational (either in an individual with BDD or a person with no psychological difficulties), it is rational to seek treatment if you think you have a problem. The individual is simply arguing from a false tenet.

Finally there is a debate about the likelihood of an individual with BDD attending for cosmetic treatment. A recent review of BDD suggested that in patients attending for cosmetic or reconstructive surgery or dermatology, the prevalence is likely to be between 7 to 15%3 For dentistry there are very few data, but it has been suggested that since the level of intervention in dentistry is minimal compared to surgical treatment that it may not be perceived as sufficiently 'dramatic' to attract individuals with BDD. Clearly more research is needed and careful consideration of how to assess and manage individuals with BDD in dentistry. An excellent introduction to this is provided by Cunningham and Feinman.4