Abstract
This study was designed to compare changes in strength after spinal cord injury (SCI) with the use of a hand held myometer to the manual muscle test (MMT). Eighty-eight C4-C8 Frankel A-D tetraplegie subjects were tested at various times up to 2 years post-SCI. Elbow flexor strength on successive examinations were grouped according to their early and later MMT scores (3.5 with no change in MMT, 3.5 to 4.0, and 3.5 to 4.5; 4.0 with no change in MMT, 4.0 to 4.5, and 4.0 to 5.0; 4.5 with no change in MMT, and 4.5 to 5.0). For each group, later myometric measurements (MYO) were expressed as percents of their earlier MYO and were anlayzed using paired Students t-tests. Later MYO were 116, 205, 232% (P>0.05, P<0.002, P<0.05) of their earlier MYO for groups 3.5 with no change in the MMT, 3.5 to 4.0, and 3.5 to 4.5 respectively. Later MYO were 140, 139, 191% (P<0.05, P<0.02, P<0.0001) of their earlier MYO for groups 4.0 with no change in MMT, 4.0 to 4.5, and 4.0 to 5.0 respectively. Later MYO were 127 and 126% (P<0.01, P<0.02) of their earlier MYO for groups 4.5 with no change in MMT and 4.5 to 5.0 respectively. In conclusion the hand held myometer detected changes in muscle strength not detected by the MMT.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Aitkens S et al. Relationship of manual muscle testing to objective strength measurements. Muscle Nerve 1989; 12: 173–177.
Medical Research Council. Aids to the investigation of peripheral nerve injuries. War Memorandum No 7, 2nd ed. HMSO, London, 1943.
Marino M, Nicholas J A, Gleim G W . The efficacy of manual assessment of muscle strength using a new device. Am J Sports Med 1982; 10: 360–364.
Mendell J R, Florence J . Manual muscle testing. Muscle Nerve 1990; 13:S16–S20.
Brooke M H et al. Clinical trial in Duchenne dystrophy: the design of the protocol. Muscle Nerve 1981; 4: 186–197.
Daniels L, Worthingham C . Muscle Testing Techniques of Manual Examination. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, 1972.
Kendall H O, Kendall F P, Wadsworth G E . Muscle, Testing and Function. 2nd ed. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, 1971.
Schwartz S, Cohen M E, Herbison G J, Shah A . Relationship between two measures of upper extremity strength: manual muscle test compared to hand held myometry. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992; 73: 1063–1065.
van der Ploeg R J O, Oosterhuis H J G H, Reuvekamp J . Measuring muscle strength. J Neurol 1984; 231: 200–203.
Beasley W C . Quantitative muscle testing: principles and applications to research and clinical services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1961; 42: 398–425.
Frankel H L, Hancock D O, Hystop G . The value of postural reduction in the initial management of closed injuries to the spine with paraplegia and tetraplegia. Paraplegia 1969; 7: 179–192.
Cohen M E, Sheehan T P, Herbison G J . Content validity and reliability of the International Standard for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. Top Spinal Cord Injury Rehabil, in press.
American Spinal Cord Injury Association. Standards for neurological classification of spinal injury patients. Chicago, 1989.
Brunnstrom F, Dennen M . Round Table on muscle testing. Annual conference of American Physical Therapy Associations. Federation of Crippled and Disabled, Inc. New York: pp. 1–12, 1931.
Scott O M, Goddard C, Dubowitz V . Quantitation of muscle strength in children: A prospective study in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy. Muscle Nerve 1982; 5: 291–301.
Waters R L, Adkins R H, Yakura J S, Sie I . Motor and sensory recovery following complete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74:242–247.
Marciello M et al. Wrist strength measured by myometry as an indicator of functional independence. J Neurotrauma 1994; 12: 99–105.
Bohannon R W . Hand held myometry. J Neurol Neurosurg Pyschiatry 1992; 55:982.
Moxley R T 3rd . Evaluation of neuromuscular function in inflammatory myopathy. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 1994; 20: 827–843.
Hesselmans L F et al. Evaluation of electrophysiological and clinical tests in an exploratory trial of Org 2766 in motor neuron disease. Neuromuscul Disorders 1993; 3: 319–325.
van der Ploeg R J, Fidler V, Oosterhuis H J . Hand held myometry: reference values. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1991; 54: 244–247.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herbison, G., Isaac, Z., Cohen, M. et al. Strength post-spinal cord injury: myometer vs manual muscle test. Spinal Cord 34, 543–548 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.98
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.98
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Robot-aided assessment of lower extremity functions: a review
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation (2016)
-
An outpatient low-intensity locomotor training programme for paediatric chronic incomplete spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord (2013)
-
How do C6/C7 tetraplegic patients grasp balls of different sizes and weights? Impact of surgical musculo-tendinous transfers
Spinal Cord (2007)
-
Physical capacity in wheelchair-dependent persons with a spinal cord injury: a critical review of the literature
Spinal Cord (2006)
-
Upper extremity musculoskeletal pain during and after rehabilitation in wheelchair-using persons with a spinal cord injury
Spinal Cord (2006)