Abstract
A major factor influencing compliance with walking orthoses following spinal cord damage, is the energy requirement associated with them. We compared ambulatory energy expenditure in subjects using the reciprocating gait orthosis (RGO) with and without functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the thigh muscles at self selected walking speeds. Five adult subjects (median age 34 years, range 24-37) with spinal cord lesions ranging from C2 (incomplete) to T6 volunteered to participate in this study. All subjects were successful RGO users (median use 5.7 years, range 4.1-7.3). Walking speed (m/s), ambulatory energy consumption (J/kg/s) and energy cost (J/kg/m) were derived from oxygen uptake determined using the Douglas bag technique. We anticipated that subjects walking with FES would either: (a) walk at the same speed but reduce their energy cost or (b) increase their walking speed for the same (or less) energy cost. Walking speed and energy cost remained unchanged in one subject. One subject increased his walking speed by 14.0% and increased his energy consumption by 8.4%. His energy cost remained unchanged. Three subjects increased their walking speeds (by 12.4, 12.7 and 6.8%), energy consumption (by 25.9, 20.4 and 18.4% respectively) and energy cost (by 11.6, 6.8 and 10.5% respectively). We did not find a substantial benefit, in terms of energy expenditure, from the hybrid system when walking continuously for 5 min. We suggest that the hybrid system may be of greater benefit during prolonged walking, although other limitations, inherent in the RGO itself, may prevent an increase in compliance. Repetition of walking speed tests supported the reliability of our results. Tests on comparably aged, able-bodied subjects showed that an increase in energy cost of up to 5.8% was within the biological variability of the subject and the error of the methodology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Marsolais E B, Kobetic R . Development of a practical electrical stimulation system for restoring gait in the paralysed patient. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1988; 233: 64–74.
Malezic M, Hesse S . Restoration of gait by functional electrical stimulation in paraplegic patients: a modified programme of treatment. Paraplegia 1995; 33: 126–131.
Solomonow M et al. The RGO generation II: muscle stimulation powered orthosis as a practical walking system for thoracic paraplegics. Orthopedics 1989; 12: 1309–1315.
McClelland M et al. Augmentation of the Oswestry Parawalker orthosis by means of surface electrical stimulation: gait analysis of three patients. Paraplegia 1987; 25: 32–38.
Marsolais E B, Edwards B G . Energy costs of walking and standing with functional neuromuscular stimulation and long leg braces. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 243–249.
Bernardi M et al. The efficiency of walking of paraplegic patients using a reciprocating gait orthosis. Paraplegia 1995; 33: 409–415.
Hirokawa S et al. Energy consumption in paraplegic ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and electrical stimulation of the thigh muscles. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 687–694.
Petrofsky J S, Smith J B . Physiologic costs of computer-controlled walking in persons with paraplegia using a reciprocating-gait orthosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 72: 890–896.
Isakov E, Douglas R, Berns P . Ambulation using the reciprocating gait orthosis and functional electrical stimulation. Paraplegia 1992; 30: 239–245.
Phillips C A, Hendershot D M . Functional electrical stimulation and reciprocating gait orthosis for ambulation exercise in a tetraplegic patient: a case study. Paraplegia 1991; 29: 268–276.
Sykes L, Edwards J, Powell E S, Ross E R S . The reciprocating gait orthosis (RGO): long term usage patterns. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76:779–783.
Nene A V, Patrick J H . Energy cost of paraplegic locomotion using the Parawalker-electrical stimulation ‘hybrid' orthosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 116–120.
Bromley I . Tetraplegia and paraplegia: a guide for physiotherapists. 3rd ed. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1985.
Astrand P, Rodahl K . Textbook of work physiology. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1977.
Thoumie P et al. Restoration of functional gait in paraplegic patients with the RGO-II hybrid orthosis. A multicentre controlled study. I. Clinical evaluation. Paraplegia 1995; 33: 647–653.
Stenberg J et al. Hemodynamic response to work with different muscle groups, sitting and supine. J Appl Physiol 1967: 22: 61–70.
Bevegard S, Freychuss U, Standell J . Circulatory adaptation to arm and leg exercise in supine and sitting position. J Appl Physiol 1966; 21: 37–46.
Davis G M et al. Cardiovascular responses to arm cranking and FNS-induced leg exercise in paraplegics. Am Phys Soc 1990; 69: 672–677.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sykes, L., Campbell, I., Powell, E. et al. Energy expenditure of walking for adult patients with spinal cord lesions using the reciprocating gait orthosis and functional electrical stimulation. Spinal Cord 34, 659–665 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.119
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1996.119
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Functional walking ability of paraplegic patients: comparison of functional electrical stimulation versus mechanical orthoses
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology (2013)
-
Prediction of gait outcome with the knee–ankle–foot orthosis with medial hip joint in patients with spinal cord injuries: a study using recursive partitioning analysis
Spinal Cord (2007)