The current drug development pipeline is time-consuming, costly and inefficient. To better model interactions between pharmaceuticals and human physiology and, thus, increase the likelihood of drug success in clinical trials, the effect of pharmacokinetic drug profiles on cellular behaviour should be tested early in drug development.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$99.00 per year
only $8.25 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Chi, L. H., Burrows, A. D. & Anderson, R. L. Can preclinical drug development help to predict adverse events in clinical trials? Drug Discov. Today 27, 257–268 (2022).
Sun, D., Gao, W., Hu, H. & Zhou, S. Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it? Acta Pharm. Sin. B 12, 3049–3062 (2022).
Guerrero, Y. A. et al. A microfluidic perfusion platform for in vitro analysis of drug pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) relationships. AAPS J. 22, 53 (2020).
Singh, D. et al. A microfluidic system that replicates pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles in vitro improves prediction of in vivo efficacy in preclinical models. PLOS Biol. 20, e3001624–e3001624 (2022).
Thiemicke, A. & Neuert, G. Rate thresholds in cell signaling have functional and phenotypic consequences in non-linear time-dependent environments. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 11, 1124874 (2023).
Lohasz, C. et al. A microphysiological cell-culturing system for pharmacokinetic drug exposure and high-resolution imaging of arrays of 3D microtissues. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 785851 (2021).
Petreus, T. et al. Tumour-on-chip microfluidic platform for assessment of drug pharmacokinetics and treatment response. Commun. Biol. 4, 1001 (2021).
Kolluri, S., Lin, J., Liu, R., Zhang, Y. & Zhang, W. Machine learning and artificial intelligence in pharmaceutical research and development: a review. AAPS J. 24, 19 (2022).
Jashnsaz, H. et al. Diverse cell stimulation kinetics identify predictive signal transduction models. iScience 23, 101565 (2020).
Thiemicke, A., Jashnsaz, H., Li, G. & Neuert, G. Generating kinetic environments to study dynamic cellular processes in single cells. Sci. Rep. 9, 10129 (2019).
Acknowledgements
G.N. is supported by National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01GM140240 and Vanderbilt Basic Science Dean’s Faculty Fellow Endowed Chair.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.S.L. and G.N. conceived the concept for the article and C.S.L. drafted the manuscript. G.N. critically reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
G.N. is a co-inventor of the pending patent WO2023220749A2. C.S.L. declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Related links
Modernization Act 2.0: https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/senate-bill/5002
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leasure, C.S., Neuert, G. Modelling patient drug exposure profiles in vitro to narrow the valley of death. Nat Rev Bioeng 2, 196–197 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-024-00160-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-024-00160-x