Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

The scientific narrative around new food technologies needs to change

The scientific narrative around food biotechnologies, such as genetically modified crops, is ineffective at predicting their role in the development and change of agricultural practices and food. Here, we suggest placing the scientific discussion of new food technologies in the context of the political and economic forces that shape agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Gao, C. Genome engineering for crop improvement and future agriculture. Cell 184, 1621–1635 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Klümper, W. & Qaim, M. A Meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PloS ONE 9, e111629 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Glover, D. Exploring the resilience of Bt cotton’s ‘pro-poor success story’. Dev. Change 41, 955–981 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schnurr, M. A. & Dowd-Uribe, B. Anticipating farmer outcomes of three genetically modified staple crops in sub-Saharan Africa: insights from farming systems research. J. Rural Stud. 88, 377–387 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stone, G. D. The Agricultural Dilemma: How Not to Feed the World (Routledge, 2022).

  6. Soleri, D. et al. Testing assumptions underlying economic research on transgenic food crops for Third World farmers: evidence from Cuba, Guatemala and Mexico. Ecol. Econ. 67, 667–682 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rock, J. S. et al. Beyond the Genome: Genetically Modified Crops in Africa and the Implications for Genome Editing. Dev. Change 54, 117–142 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Clapp, J. The problem with growing corporate concentration and power in the global food system. Nat. Food 2, 404–408 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Glenna, L. L. Are intellectual property policies for gene‐edited crops fit for purpose? The perspectives of German scientists. Plants, People, Planet https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12750 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ely, A., Van Zwanenberg, P. & Stirling, A. Broadening out and opening up technology assessment: Approaches to enhance international development, co-ordination and democratisation. Research Policy 43, 505–518 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Larsson and P. Svensson for reviewing an earlier draft of this article, and C. Tarring for her detailed proofreading.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

K.F. conceptualized and drafted the initial article. K.F. and J.S.R. researched, edited and wrote subsequent drafts.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klara Fischer.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fischer, K., Rock, J.S. The scientific narrative around new food technologies needs to change. Nat Rev Bioeng 1, 786–787 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-023-00128-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-023-00128-3

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing