Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by social and communication deficits (SCDs), restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRBs) and fixated interests. Despite its prevalence, development of effective therapy for ASD is hindered by its symptomatic and neurophysiological heterogeneities. To comprehensively explore these heterogeneities, we developed a new analytical framework combining contrastive learning and sparse canonical correlation analysis that identifies symptom-linked resting-state electroencephalographic connectivity dimensions within 392 ASD samples. We present two dimensions with multivariate connectivity basis exhibiting significant correlations with SCD and RRB, confirm their robustness through cross-validation and demonstrate their conceptual generalizability using an independent dataset (n = 222). Specifically, the right inferior parietal lobe is the core region for RRB, while connectivity between the left angular gyrus and the right middle temporal gyrus show key contribution to SCD. These findings provide a promising avenue to parse ASD heterogeneity with high clinical translatability, paving the way for ASD treatment development and precision medicine.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$59.00 per year
only $4.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data supporting the results in this study are available within this paper and its supplementary materials. The ABC-CT dataset is publicly available via the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive at https://nda.nih.gov/edit_collection.html?id=2288. The HBN dataset was obtained from the Child Mind Institute Biobank. The EEG data of the HBN dataset are publicly available through the International Neuroimaging Data-sharing Initiative at http://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/cmi_healthy_brain_network. The phenotypical data of the HBN dataset can be accessed under a Data Usage Agreement with the Child Mind Institute Biobank, from the Longitudinal Online Research and Imaging System located at http://data.healthybrainnetwork.org/. The manuscript reflects the views of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the Child Mind Institute.
Code availability
The cPCA step was implemented in Python (v.3.8.8) with a publicly available package (https://github.com/abidlabs/contrastive). The sCCA step was implemented in MATLAB (v.R2022a) using custom code. The statistical analyses were conducted in MATLAB with built-in functions. The code used in this study is available at https://github.com/Xiaoyu-Tong/Disorder-Specific-Symptom-Linked-rsEEG-FC-Dimension.
References
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013).
Zheng, S., Hume, K. A., Able, H., Bishop, S. L. & Boyd, B. A. Exploring developmental and behavioral heterogeneity among preschoolers with ASD: a cluster analysis on principal components. Autism Res. 13, 796–809 (2020).
An, J. Y. & Claudianos, C. Genetic heterogeneity in autism: from single gene to a pathway perspective. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 68, 442–453 (2016).
Hong, S.-J. et al. Toward neurosubtypes in autism. Biol. Psychiatry 88, 111–128 (2020).
Wolfers, T. et al. From pattern classification to stratification: towards conceptualizing the heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 104, 240–254 (2019).
Hus, V., Gotham, K. & Lord, C. Standardizing ADOS domain scores: separating severity of social affect and restricted and repetitive behaviors. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 44, 2400–2412 (2014).
Kanne, S. M. et al. The Autism Impact Measure (AIM): initial development of a new tool for treatment outcome measurement. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 44, 168–179 (2014).
Lord, C. et al. The autism diagnostic observation schedule–generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 30, 205–223 (2000).
Le Couteur, A, Lord, C & Rutter, M. Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (Western Psychological Services, 2003).
Constantino, J.N. & Gruber, C.P. Social Responsiveness Scale: SRS-2 (Western Psychological Services, 2012).
Bölte, S., Poustka, F. & Constantino, J. N. Assessing autistic traits: cross‐cultural validation of the social responsiveness scale (SRS). Autism Res. 1, 354–363 (2008).
Xia, C. H. et al. Linked dimensions of psychopathology and connectivity in functional brain networks. Nat. Commun. 9, 3003 (2018).
Buch, A. M. et al. Molecular and network-level mechanisms explaining individual differences in autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 650–663 (2023).
Aglinskas, A., Hartshorne, J. K. & Anzellotti, S. Contrastive machine learning reveals the structure of neuroanatomical variation within autism. Science 376, 1070–1074 (2022).
Abid, A., Zhang, M. J., Bagaria, V. K. & Zou, J. Exploring patterns enriched in a dataset with contrastive principal component analysis. Nat. Commun. 9, 2134 (2018).
Zhang, Y. et al. Identification of psychiatric disorder subtypes from functional connectivity patterns in resting-state electroencephalography. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 309–323 (2021).
Zhang, Y. et al. Machine learning-based identification of a psychotherapy-predictive electroencephalographic signature in PTSD. Nat. Mental Health 1, 284–294 (2023).
Wu, W. et al. An electroencephalographic signature predicts antidepressant response in major depression. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 439–447 (2020).
Nentwich, M. et al. Functional connectivity of EEG is subject-specific, associated with phenotype, and different from fMRI. Neuroimage 218, 117001 (2020).
Mahjoory, K. et al. Consistency of EEG source localization and connectivity estimates. Neuroimage 152, 590–601 (2017).
McPartland, J. C. et al. The autism biomarkers consortium for clinical trials (ABC-CT): scientific context, study design, and progress toward biomarker qualification. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 14, 16 (2020).
Witten, D. M., Tibshirani, R. & Hastie, T. A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis. Biostatistics 10, 515–534 (2009).
Sparrow, S. S. & Cicchetti, D. V. The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (Allyn & Bacon, 1989).
Alexander, L. M. et al. An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders. Sci. Data 4, 170181 (2017).
Bodfish, J. W., Symons, F. J., Parker, D. E. & Lewis, M. H. Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: comparisons to mental retardation. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 30, 237–243 (2000).
Hooker, J. L., Dow, D., Morgan, L., Schatschneider, C. & Wetherby, A. M. Psychometric analysis of the repetitive behavior scale‐revised using confirmatory factor analysis in children with autism. Autism Res. 12, 1399–1410 (2019).
Gabriels, R. L., Cuccaro, M. L., Hill, D. E., Ivers, B. J. & Goldson, E. Repetitive behaviors in autism: relationships with associated clinical features. Res. Dev. Disabil. 26, 169–181 (2005).
Wang, J. et al. Resting state EEG abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders. J. Neurodev. Disord. 5, 24 (2013).
Rafiee, F., Rezvani Habibabadi, R., Motaghi, M., Yousem, D. M. & Yousem, I. J. Brain MRI in autism spectrum disorder: narrative review and recent advances. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 55, 1613–1624 (2022).
Kennedy, D. P. & Courchesne, E. The intrinsic functional organization of the brain is altered in autism. Neuroimage 39, 1877–1885 (2008).
Wang, Z. et al. Resting-state brain network dysfunctions associated with visuomotor impairments in autism spectrum disorder. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 13, 17 (2019).
Itahashi, T. et al. Alterations of local spontaneous brain activity and connectivity in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Mol. Autism 6, 30 (2015).
Yerys, B. E. et al. Neural correlates of set‐shifting in children with autism. Autism Res. 8, 386–397 (2015).
Xu, J. et al. Specific functional connectivity patterns of middle temporal gyrus subregions in children and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 13, 410–422 (2020).
Samson, F., Mottron, L., Soulières, I. & Zeffiro, T. A. Enhanced visual functioning in autism: an ALE meta‐analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 1553–1581 (2012).
Watanabe, T. & Rees, G. Anatomical imbalance between cortical networks in autism. Sci. Rep. 6, 31114 (2016).
Puzzo, I., Cooper, N. R., Cantarella, S., Fitzgerald, P. B. & Russo, R. The effect of rTMS over the inferior parietal lobule on EEG sensorimotor reactivity differs according to self-reported traits of autism in typically developing individuals. Brain Res. 1541, 33–41 (2013).
Casanova, M. F., Buxhoeveden, D. P., Switala, A. E. & Roy, E. Minicolumnar pathology in autism. Neurology 58, 428–432 (2002).
Levitt, P. Disruption of interneuron development. Epilepsia 46, 22–28 (2005).
Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P. & Hanslmayr, S. EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition–timing hypothesis. Brain Res. Rev. 53, 63–88 (2007).
Mathewson, K. E. et al. Pulsed out of awareness: EEG alpha oscillations represent a pulsed-inhibition of ongoing cortical processing. Front. Psychol. 2, 99 (2011).
Jensen, O. & Mazaheri, A. Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4, 186 (2010).
Limousin, P. & Foltynie, T. Long-term outcomes of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 234–242 (2019).
Wagle Shukla, A. et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy in Parkinson disease: a meta-analysis. PM R 8, 356–366 (2016).
Casanova, M. F. et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) modulates event-related potential (ERP) indices of attention in autism. Transl. Neurosci. 3, 170–180 (2012).
Sokhadze, E. M. et al. Prefrontal neuromodulation using rTMS improves error monitoring and correction function in autism. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 37, 91–102 (2012).
Enticott, P. G. et al. A double-blind, randomized trial of deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for autism spectrum disorder. Brain Stimul. 7, 206–211 (2014).
Elliott, C. D. Differential Ability Scales, 2nd edn (The Psychological Corporation, 2007).
Fox, M. D. & Greicius, M. Clinical applications of resting state functional connectivity. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4, 19 (2010).
Mullen, T. CleanLine: Tool/Resource Info. NITRC https://www .nitrc.org/projects/cleanline (2012).
Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O. & Echallier, J. F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72, 184–187 (1989).
Bell, A. J. & Sejnowski, T. J. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 7, 1129–1159 (1995).
Tadel, F., Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., Pantazis, D. & Leahy, R. M. Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 879716 (2011).
Hauk, O. Keep it simple: a case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data. Neuroimage 21, 1612–1621 (2004).
Gramfort, A., Papadopoulo, T., Olivi, E. & Clerc, M. OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics. Biomed. Eng. Online 9, 45 (2010).
Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774–781 (2012).
Hipp, J. F., Hawellek, D. J., Corbetta, M., Siegel, M. & Engel, A. K. Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 884–890 (2012).
Siems, M., Pape, A.-A., Hipp, J. F. & Siegel, M. Measuring the cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity with EEG and MEG. Neuroimage 129, 345–355 (2016).
Rolle, C. E. et al. Cortical connectivity moderators of antidepressant vs placebo treatment response in major depressive disorder: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 77, 397–408 (2020).
Kriegeskorte, N., Mur, M. & Bandettini, P. Representational similarity analysis-connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2, 4 (2008).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant nos. R21MH130956, R01MH129694 and R21AG080425 to Y.Z., grant R01MH110512 to H.X., grants K23MH114023 and R01MH125886 to G.A.F., grants. R37MH125829, R01EB022573, R01MH112847 and R01MH120482 to T.D.S., as well as Lehigh University FIG (FIGAWD35), CORE and Accelerator grants to Y.Z. Portions of this research were conducted on the Lehigh University’s Research Computing infrastructure, which is partially supported by a National Science Foundation award 2019035. This work was also supported in part by philanthropic funding and grants from the One Mind-Baszucki Brain Research Fund, the SEAL Future Foundation and the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation to G.A.F. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study, and the collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data, nor were they involved in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
X.T. conceptualized and designed the work, wrote the code, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted and revised the manuscript. H.X., G.A.F. and K.Z. interpreted the data and refined the design of the work. T.D.S. interpreted the data and revised the manuscript. N.B.C. conceptualized the work and revised the manuscript. Y.Z. conceptualized and designed the work, oversaw the analysis and interpretation of the data, and revised the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
G.A.F. received monetary compensation for consulting work for SynapseBio AI and owns equity in Alto Neuroscience. None of the other authors declare any competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Mental Health thanks Janine Bijsterbosch, Guillaume Dumas and the other, anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figs. 1–10 and Table 1.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Tong, X., Xie, H., Fonzo, G.A. et al. Symptom dimensions of resting-state electroencephalographic functional connectivity in autism. Nat. Mental Health 2, 287–298 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00195-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00195-w