Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Symptom dimensions of resting-state electroencephalographic functional connectivity in autism

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by social and communication deficits (SCDs), restricted and repetitive behaviors (RRBs) and fixated interests. Despite its prevalence, development of effective therapy for ASD is hindered by its symptomatic and neurophysiological heterogeneities. To comprehensively explore these heterogeneities, we developed a new analytical framework combining contrastive learning and sparse canonical correlation analysis that identifies symptom-linked resting-state electroencephalographic connectivity dimensions within 392 ASD samples. We present two dimensions with multivariate connectivity basis exhibiting significant correlations with SCD and RRB, confirm their robustness through cross-validation and demonstrate their conceptual generalizability using an independent dataset (n = 222). Specifically, the right inferior parietal lobe is the core region for RRB, while connectivity between the left angular gyrus and the right middle temporal gyrus show key contribution to SCD. These findings provide a promising avenue to parse ASD heterogeneity with high clinical translatability, paving the way for ASD treatment development and precision medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Flowchart of data-driven dissection of symptom-linked neurophysiological dimensions in individuals with ASD based on contrastive rsEEG FC features.
Fig. 2: Linked dimensions between contrastive rsEEG features and symptom traits in individuals with ASD.
Fig. 3: Signature alterations in rsEEG FC for ASD symptoms.
Fig. 4: Association between symptom-linked FC dimensions and behavioral traits in the independent HBN dataset.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the results in this study are available within this paper and its supplementary materials. The ABC-CT dataset is publicly available via the National Institute of Mental Health Data Archive at https://nda.nih.gov/edit_collection.html?id=2288. The HBN dataset was obtained from the Child Mind Institute Biobank. The EEG data of the HBN dataset are publicly available through the International Neuroimaging Data-sharing Initiative at http://fcon_1000.projects.nitrc.org/indi/cmi_healthy_brain_network. The phenotypical data of the HBN dataset can be accessed under a Data Usage Agreement with the Child Mind Institute Biobank, from the Longitudinal Online Research and Imaging System located at http://data.healthybrainnetwork.org/. The manuscript reflects the views of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the opinions or views of the Child Mind Institute.

Code availability

The cPCA step was implemented in Python (v.3.8.8) with a publicly available package (https://github.com/abidlabs/contrastive). The sCCA step was implemented in MATLAB (v.R2022a) using custom code. The statistical analyses were conducted in MATLAB with built-in functions. The code used in this study is available at https://github.com/Xiaoyu-Tong/Disorder-Specific-Symptom-Linked-rsEEG-FC-Dimension.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013).

  2. Zheng, S., Hume, K. A., Able, H., Bishop, S. L. & Boyd, B. A. Exploring developmental and behavioral heterogeneity among preschoolers with ASD: a cluster analysis on principal components. Autism Res. 13, 796–809 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. An, J. Y. & Claudianos, C. Genetic heterogeneity in autism: from single gene to a pathway perspective. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 68, 442–453 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong, S.-J. et al. Toward neurosubtypes in autism. Biol. Psychiatry 88, 111–128 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolfers, T. et al. From pattern classification to stratification: towards conceptualizing the heterogeneity of autism spectrum disorder. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 104, 240–254 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hus, V., Gotham, K. & Lord, C. Standardizing ADOS domain scores: separating severity of social affect and restricted and repetitive behaviors. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 44, 2400–2412 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kanne, S. M. et al. The Autism Impact Measure (AIM): initial development of a new tool for treatment outcome measurement. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 44, 168–179 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lord, C. et al. The autism diagnostic observation schedule–generic: a standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 30, 205–223 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Couteur, A, Lord, C & Rutter, M. Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised (Western Psychological Services, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Constantino, J.N. & Gruber, C.P. Social Responsiveness Scale: SRS-2 (Western Psychological Services, 2012).

  11. Bölte, S., Poustka, F. & Constantino, J. N. Assessing autistic traits: cross‐cultural validation of the social responsiveness scale (SRS). Autism Res. 1, 354–363 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Xia, C. H. et al. Linked dimensions of psychopathology and connectivity in functional brain networks. Nat. Commun. 9, 3003 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Buch, A. M. et al. Molecular and network-level mechanisms explaining individual differences in autism spectrum disorder. Nat. Neurosci. 26, 650–663 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aglinskas, A., Hartshorne, J. K. & Anzellotti, S. Contrastive machine learning reveals the structure of neuroanatomical variation within autism. Science 376, 1070–1074 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Abid, A., Zhang, M. J., Bagaria, V. K. & Zou, J. Exploring patterns enriched in a dataset with contrastive principal component analysis. Nat. Commun. 9, 2134 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Y. et al. Identification of psychiatric disorder subtypes from functional connectivity patterns in resting-state electroencephalography. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 309–323 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Y. et al. Machine learning-based identification of a psychotherapy-predictive electroencephalographic signature in PTSD. Nat. Mental Health 1, 284–294 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, W. et al. An electroencephalographic signature predicts antidepressant response in major depression. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 439–447 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Nentwich, M. et al. Functional connectivity of EEG is subject-specific, associated with phenotype, and different from fMRI. Neuroimage 218, 117001 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahjoory, K. et al. Consistency of EEG source localization and connectivity estimates. Neuroimage 152, 590–601 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McPartland, J. C. et al. The autism biomarkers consortium for clinical trials (ABC-CT): scientific context, study design, and progress toward biomarker qualification. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 14, 16 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Witten, D. M., Tibshirani, R. & Hastie, T. A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis. Biostatistics 10, 515–534 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sparrow, S. S. & Cicchetti, D. V. The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (Allyn & Bacon, 1989).

  24. Alexander, L. M. et al. An open resource for transdiagnostic research in pediatric mental health and learning disorders. Sci. Data 4, 170181 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bodfish, J. W., Symons, F. J., Parker, D. E. & Lewis, M. H. Varieties of repetitive behavior in autism: comparisons to mental retardation. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 30, 237–243 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hooker, J. L., Dow, D., Morgan, L., Schatschneider, C. & Wetherby, A. M. Psychometric analysis of the repetitive behavior scale‐revised using confirmatory factor analysis in children with autism. Autism Res. 12, 1399–1410 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Gabriels, R. L., Cuccaro, M. L., Hill, D. E., Ivers, B. J. & Goldson, E. Repetitive behaviors in autism: relationships with associated clinical features. Res. Dev. Disabil. 26, 169–181 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, J. et al. Resting state EEG abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders. J. Neurodev. Disord. 5, 24 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rafiee, F., Rezvani Habibabadi, R., Motaghi, M., Yousem, D. M. & Yousem, I. J. Brain MRI in autism spectrum disorder: narrative review and recent advances. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 55, 1613–1624 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kennedy, D. P. & Courchesne, E. The intrinsic functional organization of the brain is altered in autism. Neuroimage 39, 1877–1885 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Wang, Z. et al. Resting-state brain network dysfunctions associated with visuomotor impairments in autism spectrum disorder. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 13, 17 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Itahashi, T. et al. Alterations of local spontaneous brain activity and connectivity in adults with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. Mol. Autism 6, 30 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Yerys, B. E. et al. Neural correlates of set‐shifting in children with autism. Autism Res. 8, 386–397 (2015).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Xu, J. et al. Specific functional connectivity patterns of middle temporal gyrus subregions in children and adults with autism spectrum disorder. Autism Res. 13, 410–422 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Samson, F., Mottron, L., Soulières, I. & Zeffiro, T. A. Enhanced visual functioning in autism: an ALE meta‐analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 33, 1553–1581 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Watanabe, T. & Rees, G. Anatomical imbalance between cortical networks in autism. Sci. Rep. 6, 31114 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Puzzo, I., Cooper, N. R., Cantarella, S., Fitzgerald, P. B. & Russo, R. The effect of rTMS over the inferior parietal lobule on EEG sensorimotor reactivity differs according to self-reported traits of autism in typically developing individuals. Brain Res. 1541, 33–41 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Casanova, M. F., Buxhoeveden, D. P., Switala, A. E. & Roy, E. Minicolumnar pathology in autism. Neurology 58, 428–432 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Levitt, P. Disruption of interneuron development. Epilepsia 46, 22–28 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Klimesch, W., Sauseng, P. & Hanslmayr, S. EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition–timing hypothesis. Brain Res. Rev. 53, 63–88 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mathewson, K. E. et al. Pulsed out of awareness: EEG alpha oscillations represent a pulsed-inhibition of ongoing cortical processing. Front. Psychol. 2, 99 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Jensen, O. & Mazaheri, A. Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 4, 186 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Limousin, P. & Foltynie, T. Long-term outcomes of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 15, 234–242 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wagle Shukla, A. et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy in Parkinson disease: a meta-analysis. PM R 8, 356–366 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Casanova, M. F. et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) modulates event-related potential (ERP) indices of attention in autism. Transl. Neurosci. 3, 170–180 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sokhadze, E. M. et al. Prefrontal neuromodulation using rTMS improves error monitoring and correction function in autism. Appl. Psychophysiol. Biofeedback 37, 91–102 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Enticott, P. G. et al. A double-blind, randomized trial of deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for autism spectrum disorder. Brain Stimul. 7, 206–211 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Elliott, C. D. Differential Ability Scales, 2nd edn (The Psychological Corporation, 2007).

  49. Fox, M. D. & Greicius, M. Clinical applications of resting state functional connectivity. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4, 19 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Mullen, T. CleanLine: Tool/Resource Info. NITRC https://www .nitrc.org/projects/cleanline (2012).

  51. Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertrand, O. & Echallier, J. F. Spherical splines for scalp potential and current density mapping. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 72, 184–187 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bell, A. J. & Sejnowski, T. J. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 7, 1129–1159 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tadel, F., Baillet, S., Mosher, J. C., Pantazis, D. & Leahy, R. M. Brainstorm: a user-friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 879716 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Hauk, O. Keep it simple: a case for using classical minimum norm estimation in the analysis of EEG and MEG data. Neuroimage 21, 1612–1621 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gramfort, A., Papadopoulo, T., Olivi, E. & Clerc, M. OpenMEEG: opensource software for quasistatic bioelectromagnetics. Biomed. Eng. Online 9, 45 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage 62, 774–781 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Hipp, J. F., Hawellek, D. J., Corbetta, M., Siegel, M. & Engel, A. K. Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity. Nat. Neurosci. 15, 884–890 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Siems, M., Pape, A.-A., Hipp, J. F. & Siegel, M. Measuring the cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity with EEG and MEG. Neuroimage 129, 345–355 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Rolle, C. E. et al. Cortical connectivity moderators of antidepressant vs placebo treatment response in major depressive disorder: secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry 77, 397–408 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Kriegeskorte, N., Mur, M. & Bandettini, P. Representational similarity analysis-connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2, 4 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant nos. R21MH130956, R01MH129694 and R21AG080425 to Y.Z., grant R01MH110512 to H.X., grants K23MH114023 and R01MH125886 to G.A.F., grants. R37MH125829, R01EB022573, R01MH112847 and R01MH120482 to T.D.S., as well as Lehigh University FIG (FIGAWD35), CORE and Accelerator grants to Y.Z. Portions of this research were conducted on the Lehigh University’s Research Computing infrastructure, which is partially supported by a National Science Foundation award 2019035. This work was also supported in part by philanthropic funding and grants from the One Mind-Baszucki Brain Research Fund, the SEAL Future Foundation and the Brain and Behavior Research Foundation to G.A.F. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study, and the collection, management, analysis and interpretation of the data, nor were they involved in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

X.T. conceptualized and designed the work, wrote the code, analyzed and interpreted the data, and drafted and revised the manuscript. H.X., G.A.F. and K.Z. interpreted the data and refined the design of the work. T.D.S. interpreted the data and revised the manuscript. N.B.C. conceptualized the work and revised the manuscript. Y.Z. conceptualized and designed the work, oversaw the analysis and interpretation of the data, and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

G.A.F. received monetary compensation for consulting work for SynapseBio AI and owns equity in Alto Neuroscience. None of the other authors declare any competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Mental Health thanks Janine Bijsterbosch, Guillaume Dumas and the other, anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–10 and Table 1.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tong, X., Xie, H., Fonzo, G.A. et al. Symptom dimensions of resting-state electroencephalographic functional connectivity in autism. Nat. Mental Health 2, 287–298 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00195-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-023-00195-w

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing